Loading...
VOL 009 (04-08-1991 to 11-12-1991)0 • REGULAR APRIL TERM HELD APRIL 8, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 8th day of April, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: The Reverend Douglas E. Thomas, Rector of the Grace Episcopal Church led the Court in prayer. Judge Hartzog, led the Pledge of Allegiance. GCRPC DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE ADVISORY COMMITTEE The resignation of Don Bridges as a member of the GCRPC Drug and Alcohol Abuse Advisory Committee was presented to the Court for consideration. The name of Judy O'Neill was presented to the Court to consider as a replacement, by Judge Hartzog. Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn to accept the resignation of Don Bridges and to appoint Judy O'Neill to the GCRPC Drug and Alcohol Abuse Advisory Committee to fill that vacancy. Motion carried. TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM -MAGNOLIA BEACH Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried to authorize Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission, Grant Administrator, to request qualifications and/or proposals for engineering services for Texas Community Development Program project of wastewater improvement at Magnolia Beach. TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM -MAGNOLIA BEACH Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried to authorize the signatures of the County Judge, County Auditor and Sherry Mc Clellan and appoint Mark Donalson fair housing and labor standards officer for Texas Community Development Program project of wastewater improvements at Magnolia Beach. CALHOUN COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL Jerry Stanley appeared before the Court to ask them to a member to the Arts Council. The court took no action. Judge Hartzog asked that Jerry and Dianne Stanley be commended for calling to volunteer during the Carbide emergency. i 2 3 4 GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY - PERMITS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk, and carried, that Calhoun County grant a permit to GBRA to install facilities as shown on the following instruments with the understanding that by the usage of such permit GBRA agrees that such facilities and the installation, maintenance and usage thereof shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions set out in the original contract between GBRA and Calhoun County dated Mar. 21, 1972 and recorded in Vol. R, Page 307 of the Commissioners' Court Minutes of Calhoun County, Texas and that GBRA agrees to be bound by all such terms and provisions. SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 3/27/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Gary Giessel C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D 18 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19 2686 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: r Date Signature Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • • • 2 1 Q3 m m a t I 'I^ 3 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION • CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 3/14/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Bobby Orr C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20A E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2681 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering:_ Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: • Date Signature 747 • Baker M. C.Hooker 836 • F E. Sewell 771 • C. E Stubbs 763 • 1671 Allen Pogel J. Boxko a ( J. C. Walloce 662 • o 1 • 684 E Peitsch 831 • •` �j & H. Hirsch e P C. Boethel 694 • 4� S3Nz Equipment Co. r1 ' John Teel • 1606 O L 10849 G. A. Selby ,I O I • 1666 t' Loihom Thomas A ET /3 Ty /z>e . i F852 Hindman Hockermi 16 814 F Shot ter SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION • CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: /26/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Abraham Kennedy C. Number of Connections Wanted: One. D. Map Sheet Number: D18 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2687 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line• 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as Date submitted: Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: • Date Signature No y � ' j O i a�A N N m N g I: I •� I NO �Iro W- -a I I w'J io I I; MGr H L'VE x. Dw c 515 Ir m• rii O 29 irfll A%raharn �lenne�7 i9 -a607 PT 1) / 8 n u vi SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION • CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: March 20, 1991 B. Name Of Customer Requesting Service: Dale M. Schroeder C. Number of Connections Wanted: 3 D. Map Sheet Number: D19A E. Customer Number to be assigned: #19-2683, T9-2684, 19-2685 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: • Date Signature R I • d°i �U zoOV - qTP g rN 0 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION • CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/4/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Burley R,. Melton C. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: D1A E. Customer Number to be assigned: #21-2436 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: • Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installatidn completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans"; Operations: Date Signature • Engineering: Date Signature WRAOE IMDER MAres/ iivf OL'TAIL NFw 4 1"E \ \\ J De 1 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 2/14/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service; Philip Wehmeyer C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D-2 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 11-2682 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature • • Engineering: • Date Signature orni ; Unda�roun Ts/epiaont Cob/e 6a' 60re 4 12940 Chain -Link Fence 0 �v p 1226 P �o / 1263f Loyy / Pe/(�n�t✓ /1 Nav RO 4;O21z 1/nease 0 COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY REPORTS The County Treasurer presented her monthly and quarterly reports and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that said reports be approved. CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS STATEMENT OF BALANCES Balance Balance 1/l/91 Receipts Disbursements 3/31/91 General Road & Bridge General $ 1,693,725 1,439,290 $4,311,586 195,564 $1,249,403 775,200 $ 4,755.908 859,654 • Road & Bridge Precinct 1 93,509 102,903 89,544 106,868 Road & Bridge Precinct 2 63,578 85,088 59,996 88,670 Road & Bridge Precinct 3 199,635 79,888 34,706 244,817 Road & Bridge Precinct 4 175,455 163,631 132,168 206,918 FIo-Lateral Road 800,232 458,443 204,751 1,053,924 Road Maintenance Precinct 1 59,895 1,179 -o- 61,074 Road Maintenance Precinct 4 9,273 187 -o- 9,460 Lateral Road Precinct 1 3,695 70 -0- 3,765 Lateral Road Precinct 2 3,695 70 -o- 3,765 ." Lateral Road Precinct 3 3,695 70 -o- 3,765 Lateral Road Precinct 4 3,695 70 -o- 3,765 Flood Control Precinct 1 74,247 1,466 74 75,639 Flood Control Precinct 2 854 17 -o- 871 Flood Control Precinct 3 11,892 239 -o- 12,131 Flood Control Precinct 4 1,118 17 -o- 1,135 Sanitary Landfill 270,769 56,211 49,902 277,078 Sanitary Landfill Replacement 78,609 1,453 -o- 80,062 Airport Maintenance 18,457 17,801 14,806 21,452 Bank Franchise Tax 89,856 1,772 -o- 91,628 Law Library 548 3,114 3,586 76 Library Gift -Memorial 127 -o--o- 127 Voter Registration 4,664 87 -o- 4,751 Fine & Court Costs Holding 12,930 9,402 -o- 22,332 Donations 25,932 2,517 79 28,370 Grants 12,111 540 3,408 9,243 Juvenile Probation 3,213 39,750 21,447 21,516 District Court - Inprest Jury 3,025 861 1,364 2,522 County Court - Imprest Jury 1,007 2,405 2,694 718 Excess Sales Tax Revenue 461,453 9,093 -o- 470,546 • Capital Project - Hospital 508,014 10,010 -o- 518,024 Capital Project - New Library Bldg. 50,285 899 24,802 26,382 Library Cert. of Oblig. Constr. 74,997 1,125 75,566 556 Library Cert. of Oblig. Int & Skg 3,069 60,268 41,845 21,492 General Oblig. Bonds Ilosp, Constr. 7,262,364 159,793 197,882 7,224,275 General Oblig. Bonds Int & Skg 39,685 740 75 40,350 Hospital Operating 266,940 1,723,447 1,702,187 288,200 Hospital EMS Sinking 3,111 60 -o- 3,171 Hospital Memorial 239 20 -o- 259 Indigent Healthcare 1,693 101,679 101,545 1,827 Totals 513,830,581 $7,603,535 54,787,030 516,647,086 We the undersigned County Judge and Commissioners in and for Calhoun County, Texas, hereby certify that we have this date made an examination of the County Treasurer's quarterly report, filed with us on this _J2�- day of _ 1991, and have found the same to be correct and in dude order. -_ Y WITNESS OUR HANDS, officially, this ey o: 1991. I low d g, tt�y Judge n' Zero eL , ormussroner Precinct No. 1 Helen S hhj/Conmissioner Precinct No. 3 anley ' m Commissioner Pct. No. 2 OscarCa r oner Pct. 4 SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, County Judge and County CoMissioners of said • Calhoun County, each respectively, on this _ day of 1991. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authorit FILED FO y 14 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Claims totaling $652,899.68 were presented by the County Auditor for payment and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that said claims be approved for payment. • JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER r L J C1 Keith Rudeseal with the Texas Juvenile Probation Center, Jack Whitlow, Criminal District Attorney, Judge Clarence Stevenson and Judge Michael Fricke appreared before the Court with their ideas on the feasibility of a regional juvenile detention center in Calhoun County. No action was.taken. THE COURT RECESSED. REGULAR APRIL TERM HELD APRIL 9, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 9th day of April, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 1:00 P.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court , within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT RECORDS WORKSHOP A workshop was held for all elected officials and department heads with Harriet Roberts, a representative from the Texas State Library and Archives Commissioner . Ms. Roberts ex- plained the TExas Local Government Records Law and the procedures that should be followed. No action was taken. THE COURT RECESSED UNTIL FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1991. REGULAR APRIL TERM HELD APRIL 12, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 12th day of April, 1991 there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner,Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner,Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner,Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner,Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: County Judge Hartzog led the opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLE -EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Henry J. Barber appeared before the Court and announed the Calhoun County Emergency Medical Services had received a Grant for $55,000.00 from M.G. and Lillie A. Johnson Foundation for the purchase of a Rescue truck- First Responder Unit for the Calhoun County EMS. He requested the Court authorize the advertisement for bids. Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for bids and that bids be opened May 13, 1991. Motion carried. r • • C J A . C • • !u f avd. �Zizrrb 7,7 ®w� ,/ nine�c .�.r`:s ✓emu ,� 4l16' April 11, 1991 e Calhoun County Emergency Medical Services ATTN: H. J. BARBER 216 E. Mahan Street Port Lavaca, TX 77979 Dear Mr. Barber: The Board of Trustees of the M. G. and Lillie A. Johnson Foundation, Inc. has received and reviewed your grant request at its April 3, 1991 board meeting. Your request has been approved for the amount of $55,000.00. These funds are to be used for the purchase a Rescue Truck -First Responder Unit for the Calhoun County EMS. Please advise accordingly when the funds are expended for the purpose as stated in the grant proposal. Any other use of these funds must have the prior approval of the Board of Trustees. The Foundation appreciates the opportunity to assist with the needs of your organization. Sincerely, 1( Robert Halepeska Executive Vice President RH/ck Enclosure CERTIFIED MAIL .tom 51P/575-7970 17 • PORT LAVACA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE CHIEF'S OFFICE 1501 W. AUSTIN PORT LAVACA, TX 77979 (512) 552-3241 OR 552-5617 April 5, 1991 Honorable Howard Hartzog 211 S. Ann St. Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Sir, At the request of Mr. Henry Barber, I am writing in regards to • the specialty vehicle that EMS has been awarded a grant for. The Port Lavaca Fire Department and Calhoun County EMS continuously work together to improve our emergency response delivery. I, along with Mr. Barber, feel that by having this equipment in a backup capacity would greatly improve our emergency capabilities. Both departments are in complete agreement on the implementation of this equipment. /Sincerely, ./JJ/J(� V w � A C.R. Stringham Chief 1r u Calhoun O'Ount7 Emergency Medical Services 216 E. Mahan Street • Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 (512)552-1140 April 5, 1991 Honorable Howard Hartzog 211 S. Ann St. Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Sir, Calhoun County EMS applied for and has been awarded a grant for a multipurpose rescue vehichle and equipment. The primary use of this vehichle will be dedicated to EMS response. This unit will also carry rescue equipment to be utilized as backup for the Port Lavaca Fire Department. Chief Ray Stringham and I are both in agreement that this equipment will be a major asset to both Calhoun County EMS and the Port Lavaca Fire Department. The purpose of requesting a grant for this equipment was two —fold: 1. The equipment is needed, expensive and may not be obtainable • through the normal bugetary process. 2. We feel that the equipment will demonstrate its value over the next year without a major expense to the EMS budget. This vehicle will have the capability of carrying equipment that would ordinarily have to be brought to the scene in someones private car, causing a considerable delay in treating the patient. Calhoun County EMS has the policy of identifying future equipment needs and taking steps to squire that equipment prior to a incident rather than after the fact. This policy has well been demonstrated by the Vertical Rescue equipment, Dive equipment and the Disaster Trailer. All of this equipment was available prior to the need and was demonstrated to be of great value. We are extremely greatful to the Johnson foundation for making these funds available to us. If you have any questions regarding this equipment or EMS in general, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, H.J. arber • Director '19 Calhoun COunt-7 EM argOn-07 Uedical Services 216 E. Mahan Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 (512)552-1140 MEMORANDUM To : Port Lavaca Fire Department From : Calhoun County EMS Subj : EMS Grant Date : 04/08/91 As some of you may have heard, we have received a grant for a rescue truck. We hope to be able to acquire a set of Hurst rescue equipment with this vehicle. In order to alleviate any concerns about EMS entering into the rescue business, let me say that we are in the patient'care business. We will continue to support the fire departments rescue operation by assisting in any way we can. Thus the Hurst equipment is only a backup for the Fire Department. By • having this equipment on our unit we are able to have a second set of equipment on every 10-50. We fully expect the Fire Department to be responsible for the operation of this equipment. EMS in turn agrees to cross train our people in the event we are needed to assist. This is comparable to your ECA's and EMT's training in the event we need your assistance. The Fire Chief and I both feel that this is an opportunity to good to pass up. We feel that this vehicle and the equipment carried will benefit both departments. If you have any questions feel free to contact me. H.J a. Zr.J EMS Director. 0 AMBULANCE -PORT O'CONNOR Motion was made by Commissioner Belk and carried, that the old used as a back-up when the new further order of the Court. COMMISSIONER .PCT.4- PICK-UPS Hahn, seconded by Commissioner ambulance at Port O'Connoer be ambulance is received, until Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula to authorize County Auditor to advertise for bids for two pick-ups for Precinct 4. There • being no second Commissioner Mikula amended his motion. Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that since it is not necessary to advertise for bids under the Emergency statute -County Purchasing Act of 1985, Sec. 4a2 when there is a public health hazard; that Commissioner of Precinct 4 be authorized to purchase two pick-ups used primarily for spraying of mosquitoes. CALHOUN COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL- APPOINTMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that Merilou Russell be appointed to the Calhoun County Arts Council by acclamation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the minutes of the Commissioners' Court meetings of March 7th, March 11, March 15th and March 28th, 1991 be approved. tan ey a, ommis ion ,Pct.2 Oscar F. Hahn,COmmissioner,PCt.4 voward G. tzog, aj ounty Ju ge art ne Paul,County Clerk SHERIFF -EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS CONSOLE This item was considered and re -set for April 30, 1991 agenda. No action was taken. SOUTH CENTRAL CALHOUN COUNTY WATER CONSTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. ONE - LEASE AND CONTRACT AGREEMENT Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Lease and Contract Agreement with South Central Water Control and Improvement District No. One be approved and authorized the County Judge to sign the contract subject to the approval of South Central Water Control and Improvement District No. One. • MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MIKULA, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BELK AND CARRIED, that at the completion of Phase II of the Magnolia Beach Waste water project , the County Auditor, and Commissioner Belk report to Commissioners' Court the actual cash and in -kind expendi- tures from Calhoun County and should subject cash contributions exceed $25,000.00 then Commissioners Court will request that South Central Calhoun County Water Control and Improvement District No.l re-imburse Calhoun County the amount in excess of $25,000.00, with subject amount being re-imbursed within a reasonable period of time. 21 • BOARD OF DIRECTORS' MEETING The South Central Calhoun County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 held a special meeting of its Board of Directors on March 12 1 1991, at 10:00 a.m., in the Precinct No. 1 warehouse, also known as the Magnolia Beach Fire Department Building, Magnolia Beach, Calhoun County, Texas. All members of the Board of Directors were present. The president, Barbara Tipton, stated that the purpose of the meeting was to review and execute the Lease Contract by and between the COUNTY OF CALHOUN and the SOUTH CENTRAL CALHOUN COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1. After discussion and review of the Lease Contract, and the report of the president that the same was prepared by the District's attorney, Lawrence A. Dio, in conjunction with the County's attorney, Jack Whitlow, and after several conferences and meetings with the Judge, Commissioner's Court, and Leroy Belk, it was agreed the District should execute the Lease _ Contract. • Motion was made by Clarence Raven and seconded by Kirby Martin , that the president and the secre- tary be authorized to execute the Lease Contract pertaining to the Waste Water Project as prepared by the District's attorney, Lawrence A. Dio. Motion was seconded and passed unanimously. Being there no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ARBARA TIPTON, PRESIDENT The above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Board of Directors' Meeting held in the Precinct No. I ware- house, also known as the Magnolia Beach Fire Department Build- ing, Magnolia Beach, Calhoun County, Texas, on March 12 1991, at 10:00 a.m. SECRETARY • 22 • • • LEASE AND CONTRACT AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS } } KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF CALHOUN } This Lease and Contract Agreement made this 12th day of April, 1991, byp and between the COUNTY OF CALHOUN, TEXAS, acting under, by and through Resolution of the Commis- sioners' Court of Calhoun County, Texas, hereinafter term- ed COUNTY, and the SOUTH CENTRAL CALHOUN COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, acting by and through its Board of Directors under vote of'Resolution approved by the Board of Directors, with offices in Magnolia Beach, Calhoun County, Texas, hereinafter termed DISTRICT. R E C I T A L S: COUNTY and DISTRICT acknowledge that each party is a government body in Calhoun County, Texas, and that the COUNTY is the owner of all the property situated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which property is situated in the jurisdictional limits of Calhoun County and in the boundaries and territorial area of the DISTRICT. The DISTRICT being a government body created under Section 59 of Article 16 of the Constitution of Texas and Chapter 51 of the Texas Water Code, having powers in jurisdiction thereby granted, including any and all amendments thereto. The COUNTY and the DISTRICT agree that this Lease and Contract Agreement is for the general good and public welfare of those citizens and property owners residing within the boundaries and the territorial limits of the DISTRICT, and property situated therein, although the owners of same may not live within the DISTRICT or the COUNTY, and that the use of said facilities (Exhibit "A"), hereby leased and contracted, service the health and general public welfare of the DISTRICT. SECTION ONE PROPERTY LEASED COUNTY hereby leases and contracts with the DISTRICT all of the property situated on Exhibit "A", both per- sonal and real, located in the boundaries and territorial jurisdiction limits of the DISTRICT. The DISTRICT is an organized governmental body located in the boundaries and territorial and jurisdictional limits of the COUNTY. The COUNTY and DISTRICT have identified and executed the Exhibit "A" attached to this Lease and Contract Agreement and have incorporated the same herein for all purposes and it is made a part hereof. Page 1 23 • It being understood that certain streets and roadways of the COUNTY set out in Exhibit "A" are part of the pro- perties used and to be used by the DISTRICT. These streets and roadways are necessary in the operation of the waste water treatment plant and the need of waste water collection lines for the services to the property owners and inhabitants of the boundaries and territorial limits of the DISTRICT. In this respect the DISTRICT receives a permissive use only from the COUNTY in the operation of said waste water collection lines on the streets and road- ways set out in Exhibit "A" or any additional streets or roads added to Exhibit "A" in the future. The DISTRICT does not and shall not receive any more than a permissive use in the operation of the DISTRICT'S lines in the streets and roadways, which includes right to go in and on the property for said purposes of maintaining, repair- ing and replacing the same. The COUNTY retaining any and all other rights, title, legal and equitable, in said streets and roadway easement areas which the DISTRICT will operate its waste water collection lines. Any collection lines damaged in the course of COUNTY maintenance of county roads and streets is to be repaired or replaced by the DISTRICT. Any expense of relocation of collection lines at request of the COUNTY is to be the responsibility of the DISTRICT. SECTION TWO • TERM The term of this Lease and Contract Agreement shall be for 10 years commencing on the 1st day of May, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of April, 2001. As used herein the expression term hereof refers to the initial term and to any renewals thereof hereinafter provided or may be by reason of extension and renewal agreed to by the COUNTY and the DISTRICT. SECTION THREE CONSIDERATION The COUNTY acknowledges that the DISTRICT has been operating the wa*te water plant and collection lines for the benefit of the citizens, property and property owners situated in the boundaries and territorial limits of the DISTRICT. The COUNTY and the DISTRICT further acknowledge that previous consideration has been received in the construction of the plant and the property used in relationship therein from grants received by the agencies of the State of Texas and an additional contribution of in kind services or cash of matching funds by the COUNTY of NINETY THOUSAND AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($90,000.00) in the health and general welfare to the general public. The COUNTY and the DISTRICT further acknowledge there is a second part of the operation of the waste water plant • services to be installed in the future and a grant has been approved from the Texas Department of Commerce Page 2 (Community Project) of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($250,000.00). The COUNTY has agreed to pa a maximum of TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($25,000.00) in matching funds of in kind services or • cash towards the construction of the second phase of the improvements within the boundaries and territorial limits of the DISTRICT. The DISTRICT agrees to pay to the COUNTY, TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($2,500.00) per year, for a period of Ten (10) years, as consideration rental for the property set out in Exhibit "A". The first TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($2,500.00) payment shall be due one year after construction has been completed and an additional TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($2,500.00) shall be due each year there- after until the entire matching funds of TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($25,000.00) has been paid. Should the DISTRICT become insolvent, or cease to exist, or fail to meet the terms and conditions of this Lease and Contract Agreement, or fail to meet it's financial obligation to the COUNTY, or the taxpayers of the DISTRICT, as specified in this Lease and Contract Agreement, then it is hereby agreed, by all parties, that COUNTY has no responsibility or obligation for the con- tinued operation or maintenance of the waste water treatment facilities. At the end of the term of this Lease and Contract Agree- ment, or whenever the DISTRICT satisfies it's financial obligation to the COUNTY, whichever comes first, then the COUNTY will transfer ownership to the DISTRICT of the waste water treatment plant, any real property on which the waste water treatment plant is situated, and the waste water treatment plant's supporting facilities. SECTION FOUR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS DISTRICT acknowledges that the property situated in Ex- hibit "A" is in the DISTRICT'S possession and that the same is in a good state of condition. The DISTRICT acknowledges further that it has been in the operation of the plant and the facilities (Exhibit "A") and the service to the citizens, property and property owners of the DISTRICT and has been in possession of the funds, which funds are used in the operation and management of the DISTRICT in the waste water plant properties (Ex- hibit "A"). The DISTRICT. acknowledges that it shall be responsible for all expenses in maintaining, repairing and replacing said property and further to be responsible for any and all insurance, liability and the operation of said properties. The DISTRICT is and shall be an independent operator and is not an agent, joint venturer or repre- sentative of the COUNTY nor are its employees agents or employees of the COUNTY. Page 3 • 25 n LJ The DISTRICT shall be responsible for its own auditing, legal, records and books, the filing of all necessary reports, obtaining permits from environmental agencies whether the same be state or federal, and shall comply with all statutory requirements governing said districts under the Texas Water Code and amendments thereto. The DISTRICT shall furnish an annual report of its funds and its operations to the COUNTY. SECTION FIVE ASSIGNMENT DISTRICT acknowledges that no part of this Lease and Contract Agreement is assignable nor may the same be deligated by contract, lease or sublease to third parties without the express written consent of the COUNTY. SECTION SIX WARRANTIES The COUNTY and DISTRICT agree that the COUNTY is not in the waste water business or operation, and COUNTY makes no warranties, expressed or implied, as to any property covered in this Lease and Contract Agreement and assumes no responsibility for its condition. DIS- • TRICT takes said property "as is" and shall be responsible for maintenance, repair and replacement of the same, in- cluding any and all other property which may be constructed by the COUNTY on the second phase of the waste water treatment plant services being placed within the boundaries and territorial area of the DISTRICT under the present grant received from the Texas Department of Com- merce for TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($250,000.00) and the matching funds of in kind services or cash of the COUNTY. SECTION SEVEN INDEMNIFICATION DISTRICT agrees to indemnify and save harmless COUNTY from and against,all claims for damages to property or injury to persons caused by the operation and the manage- ment and control of the properties situated in Exhibit "A" and any futute improvements situated thereon all properties used in relation thereto. The DISTRICT agrees to save, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY against the claims and damages of any and all persons using the said premises, suffered or claimed to have been suffered by any alledged condition of said property. DISTRICT further agrees to save, indemnify and hold harmless, COUNTY from and against any and all claims which may arise, from whatsoever cause, by any of the agents, invitees, servants or employees of DISTRICT. The DISTRICT hereby agrees to carry the following insurance • policies, and include Calhoun County as an additional insured, and must furnish the County Judge a certificate of insurance for each policy. Page 4 26 Subject policies must be furnished as long as this Lease and Contract Agreement is in effect. • 1. Physical Damage Coverage on the waste water treatment plant providing coverage for fire, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief and flood insurance. 2. Workmen's Compensation Coverage for all DISTRICT employees. 3. General Liability Coverage for the premises and maintenance and operation of the DISTRICT with limits of liability coverage conforming to the Texas Tort Claims Act. e 4. Automobile Liability Insurance with limits of liability coverage conforming to the Texas Tort Claims Act. SECTION EIGHT RESTORATION In the event any part or all of the structure and im- provements should be damaged or destroyed by wind, storm or flood, it is agreed that the COUNTY shall have no obligation to restore the same. The restoration of any and all improvements so destroyed shall be the responsi- bility of the DISTRICT to restore same. The COUNTY and DISTRICT agree that in the event of such • a catastrophe where the improvements are rendered partially or totally useless, the DISTRICT has the res- ponsibility to restore subject improvements. Any expansion or upgrading, for whatever reason, of the waste water treatment facilities and/or collection lines is to be the responsibility of the DISTRICT. SECTION NINE SEVERABILITY This Lease and Contract Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties and it may not be modified or terminated, except as provided herein or by other written agreement. If any provision herein is invalid, it shall be considered deleted herefrom and shall not invalidate the remaining provisions. Should any legal expense be accrued, due to the COUNTY'S association with the DISTRICT, for whatever reason, including this Lease and Contract Agreement, the DISTRICT hereby agrees to bear all legal expense, including any judgments, fines or administrative action against the COUNTY. Page 5 ! " M SECTION TEN TEXAS LAW GOVERNS This Lease and Contract Agreement is executed in Texas and all rights and liabilities hereon shall be determined in accordance with the laws of Texas. WITNESS OUR HANDS this the /DZI-'q' day of , 1991. COUNTY OF TIWN, TE By: CC-ou6tJf1dg)6 SOUTH CENTRAL CALHOUN COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 �c y `y 1 .- ATTEST: pcuj- Marlere Pau , County C erc '11ar0ara Tipton, Prers'Ident ATTEST: Se retary, 46uth Central Calhoun County Water Control and Improvement District No.1 n Page 6 • is • EM !11�� , L;II.d e' V ~ ut ILI 5K IV K. 20 .. 5.17 _ ... .r t Tl +IA 22s 1431 ... �'.' ••, /°t,1h:i �j�Y I $It IRS FOR .Is/ ADD IT/ON TO ALAMO b£AC/L PRS FOR MAGNOLIA PALMS SURD/VISION RS FOR ID AODIT/ON 4i,l ie 1437.., F 14.37 I'''�q ""�(,J. .�+`'R5 FOR /r/ ADO/T/ON 7D TURP£N ADD/7/ow ., 1 !{.•,r ��`. "'„d. Mz.� 1RS FOR UNDERNILL SUBDIVISION • 4 _ - I ..��';: ,.\jY. d\,. 6j �55 ', @;w .r .0 xou,l 6RS FOR /sl ADDITION TD UNDERNILL SUVDIV/SI( •!: .1' ` _ \. ���• (C._'ti,�• t x Ica 7RS FOR Pod ADDITION TO UNDERNILL SUDDIVISI.' 1437.. 13.5 «i •1"''�"'~• !� \' DRS FOR 4M A IL ADO/T/ON TO UNDERNL SUDO/VLSI L'� S'. \ ORS FOR A/A DOq/0 N TO UNOfNI//(L SOROIV_/S/C �y^y!: ! s BAY 13.7 125.E _AIALLORY Isl ADDITION 12D7 .e ry • .� 1H. «J..d �• SEE ;1/ECT IRS oI A-235 �' tll lr /(III'N 12.49. IL23• i A+ A �. 13.36. .e 1437 200 023...I R92.,. 921.. 20,18.1. 1390«. 1437.. U16., IU23 .. 40 ... �1309 .,. � 1 1428.,. 12;//.,. 1991c Ii9 l:33 CJ 920 AC. PIP BRI S/DE BEACH SEE IRS OF A-28 i INxIAN YD/N) I �AfALt ORY 20d ADDITION SEE Sl/EET IRS of A-235 I - III .� N MIL IS SUBD �i SEE SIIEET 6RS«A-20 r f l 7 O O, IF AC. BAY57DE 8£ALN IUV - FjDO/T/ON - SEE 2RS OF A-28 �� �i8y/ear Bg a \MATAGORDA 7 BAY 29 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED -COUNTY Claims totaling $110,959.22 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Judge Hartzog and carried, that said claims be approved for payment • ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL Claims totaling $1,765.54 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Judge Hartzog and carried, that said claims be approved for payment. THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL APRIL TERM HELD APRIL 30, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I • I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 30th day of April, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner,Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner,Pct. 2 Helen J.''Smith Commissioner,Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner,Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: County Judge Howard G. Hartzog led the opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. BUDGET AMENDMENTS -GENERAL FUND, BANK FRANCHISE TAX FUND - SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT • Motion made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that funds of $35,627.00 be transferred from the Bank Franchise Fund to the Sheriff's Dept. to pay benefits for one deputy for 1991, and that $32,000.00 be transferred from deputies salaries to Capital outlay to buy a radio console for the Sheriff's Dept. V.V BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Sheriff's Department • (Department making this request) Date: 4-15-91 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account ---Account Name ---Amount-------Reason O1 45-40 4303 Law Enforcement Deputies 35,627. To pay for salary and (new) 01 90�.00 9137 Transfer from Bank benefits of one deputy Franchise Tax Fund (35,627) for 1991. (new) 37 90-00 9201 Transfer to General - Fund 35,627 Net change in total budget---0--- Net increase Gen.Fund Budget for this department is: $ 35,627 Net increase Bank Franchise Other remarks/justification: Tax Fund Budget I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested un Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): E 31 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Sheriff's Department (Department making this request) Date: 4/15/91 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year. following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount Reason (new) 01 45-40 7605 Radio Console 32,000. To finance the purchase 01 45-40 4303 Law Enforcement Deputies (32,000.) of radio console. • Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: $---0--- I understand that my budget cannot be amended as r uested nt'1 Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • • BIDS AND PROPOSALS -FUEL FOR MONTH OF MAY The following bids were received for fuel for the month of May and after reviewing said bids a motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the low bid of Thomas Petroleum Company be accepted. FUEL IIID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/Mo. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ glq X 2800 = $ 0202 ''2v PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ pg-9 X 3000 = $/�o��� •mod DIESEL FUEL $ 0q X 2500 = $ TOTAL BID PRICE $ l S S �2.70 •THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING MAY 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH ;PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES [QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: Ivr n //Cf y-r- . CO. ADDRESS (/' "n• �✓�1/�w� 2_ /I7 CITY, STATE, ZIP ,N4L)o_ E A _ '179GZ. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:_��_ _ TITLE DATE • • FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE DIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICEL,AL,LON Y APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ .795 Y . 2800 = $ 2k (eo0 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $_B-15- Y 3000 = $ e 85.E 0 DIESEL FUEL $.(ni X 2500 = $ OOb TOTAL BID PRICE THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING MAY 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING • DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: �g�j�� CO. ADDRESS �G �1u CITY, SPATE, ZIP r77%p '70 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:iCJ TITLE -av Oihit:, DATE 2 i • FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER T11E FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GILLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL ppp GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE. $% X 2800 = $ .2 -2 -2 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ y X 3000 = $ z 57- l-Z•0 DIESEL FUEL $ 6 X 2500 = $�" TOTAL BID PRICE $ > 7S,Z'p THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING MAY 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. • NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE E f -e' !-ro. 35 ENGINEERING SERVICES -MAGNOLIA BEACH PROJECT Proposals were received from Urban Engineering, South West Engineers, Inc., John D. Mercer & Associates, Testingeers, Inc., G & W. Engineers, Inc., and Balusek, Frankson & Assoc. A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that this item be tabled until May 13th and that a committee consisting of Commissioner Belk, a representative from Golden Crescent Council fo Governments, and from South Central Calhoun County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 consider these proposals and choose a qualified engineers' services. JUDGES GAVEL Judge Hartzog asked that the following letter be entered into the Commissioners' Court minutes due to the historical value of the gavel he received from Robert Whitehead. �Sq -k-" -'C� dL- - , &W, a o� aa�Az. 1J w o-/-,) QN,.c� aL F�lnB �� ch� • 36 CONSTABLE - PRECINCT NO. FIVE - RADIO a Motion made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the radio that belonged to Constable, Pet. 5 be declared as salvage and accept John Taylor, Jr.'s letter stating he would remove the radio for the salvage rights. Eme/gencyManagemeM (S12) 5514400 211 S. Ann S&VO Room 108 PM Lavaca, Texas 77979 CALHOUN COUNTY Bu17d)ng Department Floodplain AdmiAdministration(512) 553 4455 (512) 5534455 DATE: APRIL 25, 1991 TO: JUDGE HARTZOG & COMMISSIONERS COURT FROM: W. R. ZWERSCHKE r SUBJ: REQUEST TO SALVAGE' RADIO EQUIPMENT • I am writing in response to the removal of radio equipment from the van of John E. Taylor, ex -constable of Precinct 5. This equipment is in very bad shape and will not be worth the labor of removal. I would suggest that it be declared as salvage equipment and be disposed of. Please see attached correspondence.. There is also several other very old, obsolete, pieces of equipment that is of no workable value or worth repairing. I would like to ask the court to look at this old equipment for disposal in the same manner. • 0 W.R. Zwmd*e 3'7 Calhoun County Communications 2l1 So. Ann St. Pori: Lavaca Texas 77979 Opril 2:3, 1991 Emergency Management Department Rm. 108 Taylor Enterprises FCC 8 PG-10-22639 Rt. 1 Box 146 Edna Texas 77957 Ref: Motorola Radio in Pct. 5 Constables Van in Port O'Connor This letter is in response to conversation with the Calhoun County Emergency Management Coordinator regarding the removal of the radio from the past Constable's van in Port O'Connor. The radio, due to it's age and condition, is beyond economical repair for reuse as a vital communications device in a communications critical envirnnment. This causes the value of the radio to be essentially nil e:;cept for salvage purposes for parts. In ❑rder that the County's need to have the radio removed from the van, and my need for parts may be mutually met, I would be willing to go to Port O'Connor to remove the radio, in a manner and at a time suitable t❑ the vehicle owner, in exchange for the radio and associated parts in the van. Sincerely yours, John E. Taylor Jr. ppR 2 A 1991 • • • VETERANS LAND BOARD COUNTY COMMITTEE • Motion made by Judge Hartzog, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, to accept the resignation of Curtis Foester and appoint Ted Wilson to fill the vacancy of Veteran Land Board Committee. • • ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER Motion made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the matter of appointing an Animal Control Officer be tabled indefinitely. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED -COUNTY Claims totaling $164,574.26 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula, and carried, that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- HOSPITAL Claims totaling $437,445.91 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn, and carried, that said claims be approved for payment BUDGET AMENDMENTS- ROAD & BRIDGE GENERAL FUND -VARIOUS GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTS -WORKER'S COMP. -PORT O'CONNOR AMBULANCE SERVICE Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the following Budget Amendments be approved. 39 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST • To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: `P Q & Q ntn c. ,Vt (Department making this request) Date: I request an amendment to the 9/ I budget for the following line year items in my department: Amendment G_L_A_Qcc_�ount� Amou�n%t/__-_ Reason_ry f),S' ( {)u��`f���'vW (_#__'\ ___Acicount_Name___ ___ _ {n'_�__f, �l E Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: $ — 0, I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. '' // w ((��ypp�� Signature of official/department head: PA&IJ LI GAAC,� b ru Date of Commissioners' Court approval: �c9x) Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • i' • 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEBT To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: JhAJt9WV 1JRIVA J A7UAtiI (Department making this request) Date: Og - C),-,-q I I request an amendment to the 111 G II budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account-#- ---Account Name Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: Amendment ---Amount - -----Reason 11-7, PJ I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. II II D (� Signature of official/department head: I AoO(1lolA L Date of Commissioners' Court approval: J Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 41 • BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST 11 To: CalhounCountyCounty Commissioners' Court C� From: 11An CRJ �Jfi M CA . � 1� (Department making this request) Date: LI-30-91 (, I request an amendment to the I Ibudget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount Reason F11-Stic�G-52�o cL I _ � NO4 Pt\J vracep., f Net change in total budget for this department is: $ Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval.is obtained. o Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 0 42 • CA is 1 2 3 4 3 6. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IQ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Motion by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the bill from Memorial Medical Center for $626.40 for hepatitis vaccine for members of Port O'Connor Ambulance Service be approved. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED-REXCO Motion by Commissiner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk, and carried to authorized Judge Hartzog to negotiate with Rexco as to final payment of bill as to information furnished by the County Auditor. BIDS AND PROPOSALS- MEMORIAL HOSPITAL -EXPANSION The following bids for the expansion of Memorial Medical Center were opened at 2:00 P.M. A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the awarding of the.bids be tabled until May 13th,1991, and the award be made at that time based on the architects recommendation. DOCUMENT AC - FORM FOR BIDDING PROPOSAL LUMP SJ,M CONTRACT Submitted Byt OoNsIRUCTION SUPERVISORS, INC. _ Addresst _413Q Bg lairs Boulevard City, State, Zips Jkaton,.Texas _77079 Telephones — Date: April 30, 1,991 T0: The Honorable Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Calhoun County Commissioner's Court- • CO my courthouse 211 south Ann Street Pot Lavaca, Texas 77979 PROJECTS Phbee I - Addition and Renovations .. Memorial Medical Center Hospital PoYt Lavaca, Texas ARCHITECT/ENGINEERt I Page Southerland Page 7211 Regency Square Boulevard Suite 202 Houston, Texas 77036 Having carefully examiped the Instructions to Bidders, the .. General Conditions of the Contract, the Supplementary Conditions,. the Specifications and.Drawings, and the Supplementary Contract Documents, as weal as the premises of the project and the condi- S;•'`:'. " tiona affecting the work including the availability of materials and labor, this 'Bidder hereby proposes to furnish all labor, material and equipment, to construct the project in accordance with the Contract Documents at the prices stated below. These prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the Work required under the Contract Documents. This Bidder acknowledges the receipt of Addendum No. 1 through AddendumS No..i4 issued during the time of bl Un9 and has included alll revisions described within this Bid. 489450 " AddenduIm No. 3, 4/25/91. 43 Y 1 BASE BID: 2 3 For all work described in the Plans and Specifications, including 4 all general construction work, mechanical and electrical'work, 5 this Bidder agrees to perform all, this work for the sum of: 6 7 9 t J DOLLARS ($ -=4 . 10 I . 11 ALTERNATE BIDS: 12 13 14 Alternate-BidlNo. 1:: If the addition of the Physical Therapy/ 15 Cardiology structure; is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: 16 17 18 19 I DOLLARS ($20 21 I A 22 Alternate Bid No. 2: if the addition of the Business Office 23 structure is cce.tod, to the Base Bid ADD: 2425 26 27 _ I DOLLARS ($ �oT/YYJ. j• 28 29 30 Alternate Bid No. 3:' If the substitution of modified bitumen 31 in lieu of coal tar1roofing is accepted, including adjustment 32 of roof slopes to meet manufacturer's standards, from the Base 33 Bid 889 3435 ✓��� 36 37 _ DOLLARS 36 - - — 39 Alternate Bid No. 4: If the addition of standby chilled water 40 pump and condenser :Dater pump is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: 41 42-- 43 `44 -'--- i DOLLARS 45 ($�=)• 46 Alternate Bid No. If the addition of 2-1/2" asphalt 47 concrete in 1 eu of.5" crused limestone is used, from the Base 48 Bid X087 :50 ' 49 51 52 I _ DOLLARS ($ ��� DO ). 53 AC-2 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 • U • 1. 2 3 `. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3I 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Of Alternate Bid If hospital sine " DEDUCTts " Of This Bidder a " connection wi " Conditions, A " 1. Changes 0_6: If the substitution of a pre-engineered ydrauLic elevator is accepted,from the Base Bid }. DOLLARS tea that charges for overhead and profit in authorized changes in the Work (General icle 12), shall be as follows; result in a net increased coat: f, of a. Cost for labor and material provided by the General * Contractor's own forces shall Include a maximum " Gene'ral Cohtractor markup of _10 __% overhead and 4 profit. b. Cost for labor and material provided by Subcontrac- tors shall include a maximum General contractort� markup of 10 4 overhead and 5 profit:. �4 2. Changes that result in a net decreased coati a. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by the General Contractor's own forces shall .include credits for General Contractor markup of 0 4 . is over overhead 'a'nd 04 profit, t b. Credit for labor and material to have been provided is by Subcontractors shall include credits for General Contractor markup of O_T8 overhead and 0__8 profit. -' Upon receipt of 'notf6e of acceptance of this Bid, this Bidder agrees to execute the formal Contract within ten (10) days and deliver the regyired Performance and Payment Bonds, each in the amount of 1001 of the Contract Sum, to the Owner for the faithful performance of Contract. :' this rvytd4, This Bidder further aq'rees that the attached cashier's check, certified check'or Bidder's Bond in an amount which represents the sum of five'(5) percent of the highest.total bid, is the d s amount of liquidated damages which the Owner will sustain by the failure of the undersigned to execute and deliver the above -named Agreement and Bonds,' nd if the undersigned defaults in the Agreement arjd Boris within ten (10) days of written`notiTica - J, tion of the award of (2ontract to him, the check shall become the property of the;Ownee,' or the Bidder's Bond shall become subject to forfeiture tq the owner. f. ,.,. I 489450 " Addendim No. 3, 4/25/91 ,4p 45, I This Bidder here�y agrees to commence work under this contract on 2 or before a date to be specified in the "Notice to Proceed* 3 issued by Owner �nd to fully complete the project within _ 545—_ 4 calendar days. 5 6 The Contractor further agrees to pay, as liquidated damages, the 7 sum of ONE THOUOND DOLLARS ($1000.00) for each consecutive 8 calendar day thereafter that the work remains incomplete, as. 9 hereinafter prov}ded in the General Conditions or Supplementary 10 Conditions. 1 11 12 The Bidder further agrees that this proposal shall remain in 13 effect for a per}od of sixty (60) days from the date of bid 14 opening. I 15 0ONSMUCTION SUPERVISORS, INC. 16 Bidder: 17 18 By; 19 20 �. 21 4130 6P)Iaire Boulevard tea+ 22 23 ���1tS�p��_ IPYHC %7025 24Business Address 25 26 If Bidder is a corporation, 27 complete the following: 28 29 ATTESTS 30 31 32 Notary I 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ~' 40 Corporate Seal c , 41 42 43 44 END OF DOCUMENT AC AC-4 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 • 46 DOCUMENT AC - FORM FOR BIDDING 4 PROPOSAL LUMP SUM CONTRACT • 5 6 FLINTCO, INC._ 7 Submitted By: — 8 2391_N_ E. Loop 410- 9 Address: 10 ntonio Texas 78217—__----- 11 City, State, Zip: San A __— oni ------ 12 512) 650-3128_ 13 Telephone: 14 15 Dates April 30, 1991 16 11 The Honorable Howard G. Hartzog 18 TO: 19 County Judge 20 Calhoun County Commissioner's Court 21 County Courthouse 22 211 South Ann Street 23 Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 24 25 26 PROJECT: Phase I 27 Addition and Renovations 28 Memorial Medical Center Hospital 29 port Lavaca, Texas 30 31 Page •32 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Page Southerlande Boulevard 33 7211 Regency Square 34 Suite 202 35 Houston, Texas 77036 36 37 3gg 34 Having carefully examined the Instructions to Bidders, the 40 General Conditions of the Contract, the Supplementary Conditions, 41 the Specificatigns and Drawings, and the Supplementary Contract 42 Documents, as wpil as the premises of the project and the condi- 43 tions affecting the work including the availability of materials 44 and labor, this.Bidder hereby proposes to furnish all labor, 45 material and egUipment to construct the project in accordance 46 with the Contract Documents at the prices stated below. These 47 prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the Work 48 required under the Contract Documents. 49 1 50 This Bidder acknowledges the sreceipt sued of Addendum meNo. 6i�Lng and 51 through Addendum No. —4__ 52 has included all revisions described within this Bid. 53 AC-1 • 489450 " Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 47 BASE BID: For all work described in the Plans and specifications, including all general construction work, mechanical and electrical work, this Bidder agrees to perform all this work for the sum of ALTERNATE BIDS: Alternate Bid No. 1: If the addition of the Physical Therapy/ Cardin ogy structure is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: DOLLARS Alternate Bid No. 2: If the addition of the Business office structure is zccepted, to the Base Bid ADDS LARS ( $_(31-122z2 > • Alternate Bid No. 3: If the substitution of modified bitumen in lieu of coal tar roofing is accepted, including adjustment of roof slope$ to meet manufacturer's standards, from the Base Bid 1 y%)) DOLLARS ($��0-�---) Alternate Bid.No. 4s If the addition of standby chilled water pump and condgnser water pump is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: OU-- _��h (-P��",7-- - DOLLARS ($ /�i3�0—�___)• Alternate Bid No. 5: If the addition of 2-1/2" asphalt concrete in lieu of 5" crused limestone is used, from the Base Bid AM AC-2 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 ,10 .- C DOLLARS ($ ) • 11 • Is • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2§ 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 * Alternate Bid No. 6: If the substitution of a pre-engineered * hospital size hydraulic elevator is accepted from the Base Bid * DEDUCTOV �j * - - ---- _ DOLLARS * This Bidder states that charges for overhead and profit in * connection with authorized changes in the Work (General * Conditions, Article 12), shall be as follows: * 1. Changes that result in a net increased cost:' * a. Cost for labor and material provided by the General * Contractor's own forces shall include a maximum * General Contractor markup of 10 _8 overhead and * ` 5 _8 profit. b. Cost, for labor and material provided by Subcontrac- tors; shall include a maximum General Contractor markup of 5 _8 overhead and 5 8 profit. 2. Changes that result in a net decreased costa a. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by the General Contractor's own forces shall include credits for General Contractor markup of 0 8 overhead and 0 -_% profit. b. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by Subcontractors shall include credits for General Contractor markup of 0 8 overhead and—a-._-8 profit. Upon receipt of notice of acceptance of this Bid, this Bidder agrees to execute the formal Contract within ten (10) days and deliver the required Performance and Payment Bonds, each in the amount of 100% of the Contract Sum, to the Owner for the faithful performance of this Contract. This Bidder further agrees that the attached cashier's check, certified check or Bidder's Bond in an amount which represents the sum of five (5) percent of the highest total bid, is the amount of liquidated damages which the Owner will sustain by the failure of the rndersigned to execute and deliver the above -named Agreement and Bonds, and if the undersigned defaults in executing the Agreement and Bonds within ten (10) days of written notifica- tion of the award of Contract to him, the check shall become the property of the Owner, or the Bidder's Bond shall become subject to forfeiture to the Owner. AC-3 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 This Bidder hereby agrees to commence work under this contract on or before a date to be specified in the "Notice to Proceed" issued by Owner and to fully complete the project within 41311 calendar days. The Contractor further agrees to pay, as liquidated damages, the sum of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00) for each consecutive calendar day thereafter that the work remains incomplete, as hereinafter provided in the General Conditions or Supplementary Conditions. The Bidder further agrees that this proposal shall remain in effect for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of bid opening. Bidder: FLINTCO, INC. By: ROBERT E. ROHMER, JR. --Vice President 2391 N. E. Loop 410 #401 S.A., TX Business Address - 7187I7 If Bidder is a dorporation, complete the following: ATTESTt M. Sue Smith �vV • Notary Expires 5-31-92 . 'M7Ycnrr.'is^wnsxym::09J1-921� Corporate Seal END OF DOCUMENT AC AC-4 • 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 50 • • • KC KEEPER COMPANY INC. 11111 HICHMOND, SUITE 250 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77092-6601 DOCUMENT AC - FORM FOR BIDDING PROPOSAL LUMP SUM CONTRACT • ,BUILDERS 713/784-0991 FAX 719/7eo-5611 submitted By: Keeper Company, Inc.. Address: 11111 Richmond, Suite 250 City, state, zip: Houston, Texas 77082-6601. Telephone: 713/784-0991 _-_.____ Date: ' April 30, 1991 TO: The Honorable Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Calhoun County Commissioner's Court County Courthouse 211 South Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 PROJECT: Phase I Addition and Renovations t:emorial Medical Center Hospital Port Lavaca, Texas ARCHITECT/ENGINfiER: Page lg l RegencySquareBoulevard Suite 202 Houston, Texas 77036 Having carefully examined the Instructions to Bidders, the General Conditions of the Contract, the Supplementary Conditions, the Specifications and Drawings, and the supplementary Contract Documents, as well as the premises of the project and the condi- tions affecting the work including the availability of materials and labor, this Bidder hereby proposes to furnish all labor, material and equipment to construct the project in accordance with the Contract Documents at the prices stated below. These prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the work required under the Contract Documents. 1 This Bidder Addendum 4s the issuedidurin Addendum timeNo. of bldding and through Addendum 170. 9 has included al)_ revisions described within this Bid. 51 KC 1 • BASE BID: For all work described in the Plans and Specifications, including all general construction work, mechanical and electrical work, this Bidder agrees 'to perform all this work for the sum of F j JE 1"�ll. t_10 I.i �1 U fz {-[)NOi :i� Cat{Ti�W J �HOUSfIw.� w0 Alo I U •-- ---------- -- ---- DOLLARS ($ 558a)oo0.0D __). ALTERNATE BIDS: Alternate Bid.No. 1: if the addition of the Physical Therapy/ Cardiology st#ucture is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: �laP rtun)ORED Ci(,M7YTN6`)51w6 AY00 N'01160 ----- -($ J t�D, O 047 , O O Alternate Bid.No. 2: If the addition of the Business Office • structure is 4ccepted, to the Base Bid ADD: IJiuETY E1Cn(fi T1�DuSAr)D �H E NOKEQ_ANO No (00----- DOLLARS Alternate Bid No. 3; If the substitution of modified bitumen in-11eu o£ co l tar roofing is accepted, including adjustment of roof slopes to meet manufacturer's standards, from the Base Bid -DEQU+ • rtk11 S� �HG�US%�NO i�I/J£ iJL)A)0 ZG-0 AND &)b II DO ---- ------ ---- ---- ---- DOLLARS ($ 3p Li op, ) . Alternate Bid. No. 4: If the addition of standby chilled water pump and condenser water pump is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: E(.E-460 �140uStZrv! �%i—NE ��10lZED F?G� Ate/ _Mo��oa-- DOLLARS ($ Alternate Bid.No. 5: If the addition of 2-1/2" asphalt conarete in /�l�ieu of 5" crused limestone is used, from the Base Nb Bid DE . eli: DA, • Two "TNaU5f D ONE- �AJN DPP f"JL N�01 u o-------- J_— _-_-- _ DOLLARS ($ � (Q� • �� __-) . 52 KCI * Alternate Bid Ho. 6: I£ the substitution of a pre-engineered * hospital size pydraulic elevator is accepted from the Base Bid • * DEDUCTt ----- *-----DOLLARS ($� 5 q Q7 .Ob * This Bidder states that charges for overhead and profit in * connection with authorized changes in the Work (General * Conditions, Article 12), shall be as follows: * 1, Changes'that result in a net increased cost% * a. Cost for labor and material provided by the General * Contractor's own forces shall include a maximum * General Contractor markup of /0 8 overhead and * S 8 profit. b. Cost for labor and material provided by Subcontrac- tor4 shall include a maximum Gener 3 Contractor markup of i0 _8 overhead and 5 8 profit. 2. Changes that result in a net decreased cost: a. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by the General Contractor's own forces shall include credits for Gener 1 Contractor markup of a 8 overhead and 0 § profit. - • b. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by Subcontractors shall include credits for Gei al Contractor markup of C 8 overhead and profit. Upon receipt of'notice of acceptance of this Bid, this Bidder agrees to execute the formal Contract within ten (10) days and deliver the regUired Performance and Payment Bonds, each in the amount of 100% �E the Contract Sum, to the Owner for the faithful performance of this Contract. This Bidder further agrees that the attached cashier's check, certified check' or Bidder's Bond in an amount which represents the sum of five (5) percent of the highest total bid, is the amount of liquidated damages which the Owner will sustain by the failure of the undersigned to execute and deliver the -above -named Agreement and Bonds, and if the undersigned defaults in executing the Agreement and Bonds within ten (10) days of written notifica- tion of the awa)cd of Contract to him, the check shall become the property of the owner, or the Bidder's Bond shall become subject to forfeiture to the Owner. is 53 KC 1 This Bidder hereby agrees to commence work under this, contract on or before a date to be specified in the "Notice to Proceed" issued by Owner and to fully complete the project within calendar days. — The Contractor further agrees to pay, as liquidated damages; the sum of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00) for each consecutive calendar day thereafter that the work remains incomplete, as hereinafter provided in the General Conditions or Supplementary Conditions. The Bidder further agrees that this proposal shall remainin effect for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of bid opening. Bidder: Keep ompa y n . By: Ronald AB is 11111 Richmond, Suite 250 Houston, Texas 77082-6601 ___^ • Business Address If Bidder is a corporation, complleet'e the following: ATT ST: otary Corporate/;Seel, • 54 • • • n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 36 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 DOCUMv:1J1' A,_ - FVitM FOR BIDDING. PROPOSAL LUMP SUM CONPRACT SUbmltted Byt Andress: City, State, Zip: jeIophone: Date: DON_ KRUEGER CONSTRUCTION_ CO.. ----P-o Box--3613------------_._....----_.... --- - -- _,___ 512-573-5291 ___April 30L 1991 ._____,____ TO: The Honorable Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Calhoun County Commissioner's Court County Courthouse 211 South Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 PROJECTt Phase I Addition and Renovations Memorial.Medical Center Hospital Port Lavaca, Texas ARCHI`PECT/ENGINE'rlR: Page Southerland Page 7211 Regency Square Boulevard Suite 202 Houston, Texas 77036 Having carefully examined the Instructions to Bidders, the General Conditions of the Contract, the Supplementary Conditions; the Specifications and Drawings, and the Supplementary Contract Documents, as w€11 as the premises of the project and the condi- tions affecting the work including the availability of materials and labor, this Bidder hereby proposes to furnish all labor, material and equipment to construct the project In accordance with the Contract Documents at the.prices stated below. These prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the work required under the Contract Documents. This Bidder acknowledges the receipt of Addendum No. through Addendum No. 4 issued during the time of bidding and has included all revisions described within this Bid. AC-1 48'j450 e A,I i.�r,•Jmrk No. i, 4/ 2'r/9.1 55 astsrs�a BASE BID: For all work described in the Plans and Specifications, including all general construction work, mechanical and electrical work, this Bidder agrees to perform all this work for the sum of - DOLLARS ($ S 0,30 ON ) . ------------------- --- ALTERNATE BIDS: Alternate Bid No. It if the addition of the Physical Therapy/ Cardiology structure is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: DOLLARS ($--Z00660_._.. ..-._). Alternate Bid No. 2: If the addition of the Business Office structure is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: ------..------------ --- — DOLLARS ($_gpjdo ) . Alternate Bid No. 3: If the substitution of modified bitumen in lieu of_coal tar roofing is accepted, including adjustment of roof slopes to meet manufacturer's standards, from the Base Did Dom: - /NJ—����'— ---D-- - ---- — - ---- --------------- DOLLARS Alternate Bid No. 4: If the addition of standby chilled water pump and condenser water pump is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: -----� (S6/��Q D --- ---- -- ----- ------------- DOLLARS ($_JZOdd _) Alternate Bid No. 5: If the addition of 2-1/2" asphalt concrete in lieu of 5" crused limestone is used, from the Base Bid eaw4eAtAOD ( DOLr.ARs AC-2 489450 " Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 • 56 I * Alternate_ Bid No. 6: If the substitution of a pre-engineered 2 * hospital size hydraulic- elevator is accepted from the Base Bid 3 * DEDUCT: �- ly� a— • 5 ------ - "� /�bY 4Nd 1 l- -------- — -- -- 6 7 x DOLT.ANS ($I�SV.D_.----. ---) 8 9 * This Bidder states that charges for overhead and profit in 10 * connection with authorized changes in the Work (General 11 * Conditions, Article 12), shall be as follows: 12 13 * 1. Changes that result in a net increased cost: 14 15 * a. Cost for labor and material provided by the General 16 " Contractor's own forces shall include a maximum 17 * General Contractor markup of _�O _8 overhead and 18 x $ 8 profit. 19 20 b. Cost for labor and material provided by Subcontrac- 21 tors shall include a maximum General Contractor 22 markup of 38 overhead and 5 ,_% profit. 23 24 2. Changes that result_ in a net ,decreased cost: 25 26 a. Credit for labor and material to have been provided 27 by the General Contractor's own forces shall include 28 credits for General Contractor markup of 29 overhead and B profit. • 30 31 b. Credit for labor and material to have been provided 32 by Subcontractors shall include credits for General 33 Contractor markup of _0__8 overhead and 34 profit. 35 36 Upon receipt of notice of acceptance of this Bid, this Bidder 37 agrees to execute the formal Contract within ten (10) days and 38 deliver the required Performance and Payment Bonds, each in the 39 amount of 100% of the Contract Sum, to the Owner for the faithful 40 performance of this Contract. 41 42 This Bidder further agrees that the attached cashier's check, 43 certified check or Bidder's Bond in an amount which represents 44 the sum of five'(5) percent of the highest total bid, is the 45 amount of liquidated damages which the Owner will sustain. by the deliver the above -named 46 failure of the dndersigned to execute and Bonds, and if the undersigned defaults in executing 47 48 Agreement and the Agreement and Bends within ten (10) days of written notifica- 49 tion of the award of Contract to him, the check shall become the become subject 50 property of the Owner, or the Bidder's Bond shall 51 to forfeiture to the owner. 52 0 AC-3 489450 " Ad.let;-1 m No. 3, 4/25,/91 57 This Bidder hereby agrees to commence work under this contract on or before a date to be specified in the "Notice to Proceed" issued by Owner and to fully complete the project within 41C70 calendar days. The Contractor further agrees to pay, as liquidated damages, the Sum of ONE, THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00) for each consecutive calendar day thereafter that the work remains incomplete, as hereinafter provided in the General Conditions or Supplementary Conditions. The Bidder further agrees that this proposal shall remain in effect fcr a period of sixty (60) days from the date of bid opening. Bidder: - DON_RRUEGER By: DONALD R. KRUEGER, PRE I ENT 205•PROFIT DRIVE VICTOR_ . IA -TEXAS Business Address If Bidder is a dorporation, complete the following: END OF DOCUMENT AC • AC-4 489450 " Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 I DOCUMENT AC - FORM FOR BIDDING 2 3 PROPOSAL LUMP SUM CONTRACT •4 5 6 7 Submitted By: Aliner-Dederick Constructors Inc- 6 - 9 Address: P.O. Box 130215 10 11 City, State, Zip: Houston, TX 77219 12 13 Telephone: 7131529-3001 14 15 Date: April 30 7991 16 17 18 TO: The Honorable Howard G. Hartzog 19 County Judge 20 Calhoun County Commissioner's Court 21 County Courthouse 22 211 South Ann Street 23 Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 24 25 26 PROJECT: Phase I 27 Addition and Renovations 28 Memorial Medical Center Hospital 29 Port Lavaca,.Texas 30 31 • 32, ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Page Southerland Page 33 7211 Regency Square Boulevard 34 Suite 202 35 Houston, Texas 77036 36 37 38 39 Having carefully examined the Instructions to Bidders, the 40 General Conditions of the Contract, the Supplementary Conditions, 41 the Specifications and Drawings, and the Supplementary Contract 42 Documents, as well as the premises of the project and the condi- 43 tions affecting the -work including the availability of materials 44 and labor, this Bipder hereby proposes to furnish all labor, 45 material and equipment to construct the project in accordance 46 with the Contract Documents at the prices stated below. These 47 prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the Work 48 required under the Contract Documents 49 50 This Bidder acknowledges the receipt of Addendum No. 1 51 through Addendum No. 4 issued during the time of b diding and: 52 has included all revisions described within this Bid. 53 AC-1 • 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 BASE BID: For all work described in the Plans and Specifications, including all general construction work, mechanical and electrical work, this Bidder agrees to perform all this work for the sum of DOLLARS ( $ ,S S/ Z OdD �`) • ALTERNATE BIDS: Alternate Bid No. 1: If the addition of the Physical Therapy/ Cardiology structure is /� accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: -1 U n 6 1,14 • 1-10 A DOLLARS ($ a S d. Daa Alternate Bid No. 2: If the addition of the Business Office structure is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: DOLLARS ($_ l V Z ,0Da ) . Alternate Bid No. 3: If the substitution of modified bitumen in lieu of coal tar roofing is acceptd, including adjustment of roof slopes to meet manufacturer's standards, from the Base Bid *DAD n DOLLARS ($_9SDmJ ) . Alternate Bid No. 4: If the addition of standby chilled water pump and condenser water pump is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: DOLLARS "Alternate No. 5: If the addition of 2-1/2" asphalt concrete in lieu of 5" crushed limestone is used, from the base bid BF&blel�: /#,b DOLLARS(2(JBO!� ) "Alternate Bid No. 6: If 'the substitution of a pre-engineered hospital size hydraulic elevator is accepted from the Base Bid DEDUCT: � _ DOLLARS ( $ 00' RC - 2 • • . "Tnis bidder staces that cnarges toc overhead and profit in connection with authorized changes In the Work (General Condition, Article 12), shall be as follows: 1. Changes that result in a net increased costt I a. Cost for labor and material provided by the General Contractor's own forces shall include a maximum General Contractor • markup of overhead and 6 _i _ profi,:." 2 b. Cost for labor and material provided by Subcontrac- 3 tors shall include a maximum General Contractor 4 markup of 8 overhead and �g profit. 5 6 2. Changes that result in a net decreased cost: 7 8 a. Credit for labor and material to have been provided 9 by the General Contractor's own forces shall include 10 credits for General Contractor markup of 11 overhead and profit. 12 ,�g 13 b. Credit for labor and material to have been provided 14 by Subcontractors shall include credits for General 15 Contractor markup of _�_8 overhead and 16 profit. _(�8 17 18 Upon receipt of notice of acceptance of this Bid, this Bidder 19 agrees to execute the formal Contract within ten (10) days and 20 deliver the required Performance and Payment Bonds, each in the 21 amount of 100% of the Contract Sum, to the Owner for the faithful 22 performance of this Contract. 23 •24 25 This Bidder further agrees that the attached cashier's check, certified check or Bidder's Bond in an amount which represents 26 the sum of five (5) percent of the highest total bid, is the 27 amount of liquidated damages which the Owner will sustain by the 28 failure of the undersigned to execute and deliver the above -named 29 Agreement and Bonds, and if the undersigned defaults in executing 30 the Agreement and Bonds within ten (10) days of written notifica- 31 tion of the award of Contract to him, the check shall become the 32 property of the Owner, or the Bidder's Bond shall become subject 33 to forfeiture to the Owner. 34 35 This Bidder hereby'agrees to commence work under this contract on 36 or before a date to be specified in the "Notice to Proceed' 37 issued by Owner and to fully complete the project within 455 38 calendar days. 39 4-0 The Contractor further agrees to-pay,.as liquidated _damages, 41 tthe sum of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00) for each consecutive 42 calendar day thereafter that the.work remains incomplete, as 43 hereinafter provided in the General Conditions or Supplementary 44 Conditions. 45 • AC-3 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 The Bidder further agrees that this proposal shall remain in effect for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of bid opening. Bidder: M' er- dI et rectors ..Tn By: -YyiM Stoever If Bidder is a corporation, complete the following: ATTEST: 489450 STANLEY F. PAR NolM Pubflc STATE OF TEXAS President P.O. Box 130215, Houston, TX 77219 Business Address END OF DOCUMENT AC AC-4 ,` .. o. .' C fflltl Corporate Seal • • 62 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 0, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 DOCUMENT AC - FORM FOR BIDDING PROPOSAL LUMP SUM CONTRACT Submitted By: Spaw-Glass Inc. Address: 13430 Northwest Freeway, Suite 400 City, State, Zip: Houston, Texas 77040 Z Telephone: (713) 895-0505 Date: April 30, 1991 TO: The Honorable Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Calhoun County Commissioner's Court County Courthouse 211 South Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 PROJECT: Phase I Addition and Renovations Memorial Medical Center Hospital Port Lavaca, Texas ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Page Southerland Page 7211 Regency Square Boulevard Suite 202 Houston, Texas 77036 Having carefully examined the Instructions to Bidders, the General Conditions of the Contract, the Supplementary Conditions, the Specifications and Drawings, and the Supplementary Contract Documents, as well as the premises of the project and the condi- tions affecting the work including the availability of materials and labor, this Bidder hereby proposes to furnish all labor, material and equipment to construct the project in accordance with the Contract Documents at the prices stated below. These prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the Work required under the Contract Documents. This Bidder acknowledges the receipt of Addendum No. One through Addendum No. Four issued during the time of bidding and has included all revisions described within this Bid. AC-1 •-489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 63 ti 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 BASE BID: For all work described in the Plans and Specifications, including all general construction work, mechanical and electrical work, this Bidder agrees to perform all this work for''/the sum of DOLLARS ( $_ O��S 060 ) . ALTERNATE BIDS: Alternate Bid No. 1: If the addition of the Physical Therapy/ Cardiology structure is accepted,.to the Base Bid ADD: DOLLARS:mr�riii • rr •�r Alternate Bid No. 2: If the addition of the Business Office structure is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: DOLLARS ($ IQZ3 0 a ) . r Alternate 'Bid No. 3: If the substitution of modified bitumen in lieu of coal tar roofing is accepted, including adjustment of roof slopes to meet manufacturer's standards, from the Base DOLLARS ($ os)q)(no, ). Alternate Bid No. 4: If the addition of standby chilled water pump and condenser water pump is accepted, to the Base Bid ADD: is _ n e . /) It DOLLARS ($ Is-,000 ). Alternate Bid No. 5: If the addition of 2-1/2" asphalt concrete in lieu of 5" crused limestone is used, from the Base Bid DEDUCT: AC-2 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 DOLLARS ($ • �J 01 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 * Alternate Bid No. 6: If the substitution of a pre-engineered * hospital size hydraulic elevator is accepted from the Base Bid * DEDUCT: M * DOLLARS ($ 6 QQ0, ) * This Bidder states that charges for overhead and profit in * connection with authorized changes in -the Work (General * Conditions, Article 12), shall be as.follows: * 1. Changes that result in a net increased cost: * a. Cost for labor and material provided by the General * Contractor's own forces shall include a maximum * General Contractor markup of _10 % overhead and * /6_8 profit. , b. Cost for labor and material provided by Subcontrac- tors shall include a maximum General Contractor markup of /4_$ overhead and 5' B profit. 2. Changes that result in a net decreased cost: a. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by the General Contractor's own forces shall include credits for General Contractor markup of 6_g ;overhead and _ % profit. b. Credit for labor and material to have been provided by Subcontractors shall include credits for General Contractor markup of _% overhead and _% profit. Upon receipt of notice._gf._acceptance of this Bid, this Bidder agrees to execute the formal Contract within ten (10) days and deliver the required Performance and Payment Bonds, each in the amount of 100% of the Contract Sum, to the Owner for the faithful performance of this Contract. This Bidder further agrees that the attached cashier's check, certified check or Bidder's Bond in an amount which represents the sum of five (5) percent of the highest total bid, is the amount of liquidated damages which the Owner will sustain by the failure of the undersigned to execute and deliver the above -named Agreement and Bonds, and if the undersigned defaults in executing the Agreement and Bonds within ten (10) days of written notifica- tion of the award of Contract to him, the check shall become the property of the Owner, or the Bidder's Bond shall become subject to forfeiture to the Owner. AC-3 • -� 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 65 1 This Bidder hereby agrees to commence work under this contract on 2 or before a date to be specified in the "Notice to Proceed" 3 issued by Owner and to fully complete the project within 4 calendar days. 5 6 The Contractor further agrees to pay, as liquidated damages, the 7 sum of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00) for each consecutive 8 calendar day thereafter that the work remains incomplete, as 9 hereinafter provided in the General Conditions or Supplementary 10 Conditions. 11 12 The Bidder further agrees that this proposal shall remain in 13 effect for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of bid 14 opening. 15 16 Bidder: Spaw-Glass Inc. 17 18 By: 4b�bdL`' 19 To Matl, Senior Vice President 20 21 13430 Northwest Freeway, Suite 400 22 23 Houston, Texas 77040 24 Business Address 25 - 26 If ..Bidder is a corporation, • 27 completP"the following: 28 29 AT ST 30 31 y 32 ;'Nb ry, Jonise Winkelman 33 34 ... My commission expires 7/25/91 35 36 37 38 3940 Corpora ;Xe_ Seal 41 42 43 44 END OF DOCUMENT AC r -I L J AC-4 489450 * Addendum No. 3, 4/25/91 MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER PHASE I ADDITION AND RENOVATION APRIL 30, 1991 PORT LAVACA, TEXAS PSP PROJECT NO. 489450 TABULATION OF BIDS I 1 CONfRACPOR l BFW , CONSTRUCTION l FLINTCO , KEEPER CO. �KR�ER CONST. MINER-DEDERICK I SPAW GLASSSUPE1 R SOBS n o- ---------------------------------------------------------------- RECEIPT OF 4 ADDENDA None F X X X X ----------------------- X ' X 9 BID SECURITY Re1'ance Sedgwick , Fidelity fi Aetna Casualt�y�StMParineFSZeler.Inst.ofl Deposit s--- ----5�--------------------- _3i C c �— — --------------I-----11 j BASE BID ----------I------------- --------`---5 --------,James--51----- 00 -- $5,422,000 0I 00 5,350,00000 00 5,582 -000 — 15,030 60000 --, 5,514 00000 ,________ 15 235 00000 ._--- _---_-_ C - ----------- -- ALTERNATE BID NO. 1 I Addition of P.T. & cardiology „ I 00 250,000 00 220,000 00 380,000 I 00 200,000, I 00 259,000 00 200,000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALTERNATE BID NO. 2 1 Addition of business office. „ 00 142,000 00 — 134,000 00 _____98,300 I 00 98,000__-_-- 00 ----A--0---_--- f I 00 00 -- 0-- --- - -- _-_� ALTERNATE BID No.-3 - - - -_ - ADD ADD ADD A ADD l ADD ADD l Substitution of modified bitumen. 00 000 00 29, 000------- 00 30, 900 00 000--------------- 00 00 000 ---------------- - --- - -- - -28, ----- --_--30' ---_-29_ _,___ ALTERNATE BID NO. 4 l Addition of standby chilled cater condenser &grater pumpsl - ---------------------------------- l 14,0000014,300OO11980 ( 00 1.___12,000'0 17,00000 _ 18 00000 ALTERNATE BID NO. 5 Sub. of ADD ADD ADD ADD I ADD ADD 2-1/2" asphalt concrete base ` in lieu of 5" crushed 2,000. p� 00 16,700 00 2,100 00 2,500 00 limestone. _--2,000 _ — __0 -- — — ALTERNATE BID No. 6 —`I Deduct Deduct Deduct `Deduct— Deduct l I Deduct l Deduct Substitution of pre- l 00 1,500 1, 00 1,576 00 1,500 00 1,900_—� 00 I engineered elevator. —1,000 i------------------------------- jTOTAL wiTH ALL ALTERNATES -------------------------------------- 5,856,500001 5,762.40000 66,103 70400 5 371 000001 5 941 60000 �5 604,00000 REGULAR MAY TERM HELD MAY 13, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 13th day of May, A.D. 1991,.there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., • a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner,Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner,Pct. 2 Helen J.Smith Commissioner,Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner,Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Following the invocation by Ms.Shelby Rowan, Diaconal Minister of First United Methodist Church, Judge Hartzog led the Pledge of Allegiance. BIDS AND PROPOSALS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLE Bids were opened for the emergency response vehicle for Emergency Medical Services. Henry Barber will look over the bids and report back to the Court Friday as to his recommendation. The Court took no action. 0 • FIRST RESPONSE, INC. 4766 Hlghway 42. r1lenwood. GA 30049 • Georgia 404-361-3310 / FAX 404-361-2671 May 10, 1991 Calhoun County Auditor Courthouse 211 South Ann Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Attention: Mr. B.W. Comiskey, Jr. Re: Rescue Truck Bid Dear Mr. Comiskey, First Response, Inc. is most pleased to participate in your bid for a new Rescue Truck and auxiliary rescue _ equipment. We have closely reviewed your specifications .. and feel rbidexceed asyour followsrequirements with only minorexceptions, Our 1991/1992 CHEVROLET C-3500 CAB CHASSIS FIRST RESPONSE RESCUE TRUCK PER SPECIFICATIONS PRICE FOB PORT LAVACA, TEXAS: $ 73,860.00 TERMS: NET UPON DELIVERY DELIVERY: 90 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF ORDERED CHASSIS IF EXTENDED CAB CHASSIS IS SELECTED ADD $ 1,500.00 TO BASE PRICE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS CHASSIS IS ONLY RATED AT 10,000 GVWR. First Response, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to serve you and looks forward to receive your order. Sincerely, Spa Oe. ---- James Olson General Manager JO/cc �swi TAYLOR MADE AMBULANCES 3704 Medallion Place 1-800-468-1310 Newport, AR 72112 1-501-523-9560 May 10, 1991 •B. H. Comiskey, Jr. County Auditor — Calhoun County 211 S. Ann — County Courthouse Port Lavaca, TX 77979 Dear Mr. Comiskey, Taylor Made Ambulances appreciates this opportunity to bid on your rescue vehicle requirements and is pleased to submit the following bid for your consideration. A new 1991 ylor Made Rescu Vehicle per your specifications with our listed exception for $54,670.00 FO Port Lavaca, TX. We estimate a 60 to 90, day delive of chassis. Taylor Made Ambulances is a full line ambulance manufacturer and not a dealer or distributor. We are bidding factory direct which eliminates the middle man thus providing you with the best possible price and service. We maintain over $400,000.00 in parts inventory and provide factory field technicians to service you before and after the sale. Taylor Made Ambulances has had the pleasure of constructing the last three ambulances purchased by Calhoun County and is excited about the possiblity of constructing another vehicle for the EMS. You are a valued customer and we hope to continue this working relationship well into the future. • Again, thank you for this opportunity to bid on your rescue vehicle needs. We look forward to a positive outcome. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 800-468-1310. Respectfully yours, Joseph M. Taylor Vice President Taylor Made Ambulances 0 • _ OPTION 1. Standard 1 ton Chassis in liew of extended cab. List differ in cost. THERE WILL BE A $770.00 DIFFERENCE IN PRICE SHOULD YOU OPT FOR THE STANDARD 1 TON CHASSIS RATHER THAN 991E EXTENDIiD CA11 CIIASSLS. Ulllt ISLll PRICE FOR THE STANDARD CHASSIS IS $53,900.00 FOB PORT LAVACA, 'I'X. AO TAYLOR MADE AMBULANCES • • • 3704 Medallion Place Newport, AR 72112 EXCEPTIONS ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM — SHALL BE OUR STANDARD ELECTRICAL COUNTY IS CURRENTLY OPERATING THREE TAYLOR AND IS FAMILIAR WITH OUR ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, 1-800-468.1310 1-501.523-9560 SYSTEM. CALHOUN MADE AMBULANCES BODY AND DOOR CONSTRUCTION: COMPARTMENTATION SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED, HOWEVER, THE BODY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER OUR STANDARD METHOD. THE COMPARTMENT DOORS SHALL ALSO BE PER OUR STANDARD CONSTRUCTION METHODS. AS STATED ABOVE, CALHOUN COUNTY IS CURRENTLY OPERATING THREE OF OUR VEHICLES AND IS FAMILIAR WITH OUR CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES. FIRST AID SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT PHONE 307-2a5-1083 MAY 10, 1991 '=-v ECKER FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. B.H. COMISKEY, JR. C.P.A. COUNTY AUDITOR CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS 211 S. ANN - COUNTY COURTHOUSE PORT LAVACA, TX 77979 TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT EXTINGUISHERS 1717 EASY YELLOWSTONE CASPER, WYOMING 82601 We propose to furnish (1) BECKER RESCUE VEHICLE MOUNTED on a 1991 GMC 2x4 Extended Crew Cab, 10,000 GVW 454 V8 AUTO CHASSIS per the attached specifications. Delivery to be in approximately 45-60 days AFTER RECEIPT OF CHASSIS. TOTAL PRICE FOB CASPER, WY: NET CASH DUE UPON DELIVERY. QUOTE IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS. TAXES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED. ACCEPTED BY: TITLE: $77,039.00 NO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, BY ) p, /�z�( for B CKER FIRE EQ 81 SE WYOMING BLVD CASPER, WY 82609 (307) 265-1083 FAX (307) 266-4416 • • '72 EXCEPTION TO BID BECKER FIRE EQUIPMENT ELECTS TO TO EXCEPTION TO THE CHASSIS GVW PER YOUR SPECIFICATION. YOUR SPECIFICATION REQUIRES 11,000 GVW. • WE WILL OFFER 10,000 GVW. OPTION TO BID 1. STANDARD 1 TON CHASSIS IN LIEU OF EXTENDED CAB. IF YOU ELECT TO TAKE THIS OPTION YOU MAY DEDUCT A TOTAL OF $1,000.00 FROM THE TOTAL BID QUOTATION LISTED ON OUR COVER LETTER. • C L. 13 NEEL Assoc., INC. P.O. Box 20126 Waco, Texas 76702-0126 May 10, 1991 Mr. B.A. Comiskey, Jr. CPA County Auditor Calhoun County Courthouse 211 S. Ann Port Lavace, TX 77979 512-553-4610 Ref: Rescue Vehicle Dear Mr. Comiskey: S Neel Fire Protection Apparatus, Inc. submits a quote'of'$56987s00 for the Rescue Vehicle - No Exceptions. Hurst "Jaws of Life^ equipment and generator bidiseparately. ; Prices are good for 60 days. i Terms - Net'upon"delivery. Training and delivery included. Radio equipment to be purchased from vendors listed Chass Is - GMC Delivery approximately 150-175 days ARO Discount of $1500.00 for payment of chassis upon delivery to Neel Assoc. - MSO to County. Similar units in Service: Scenic Loop VFD Amarillo, TX Waskom VFD Euless, TX Hurst, TX Woodway, TX (Medicine Rescue) Livingston, TX Wortham VFD Lease purchase financing Is available at favorable terms, with as little as no down payment. Your favorable consideration will be appreciated. Yours truly, G -e nick Gen. Mgr. GL/th- l' • • FT M-, ❑aZme1, PeAce & Safety Gquipmenl (817) 799-9176 1 (800) 433-3402 24 IIR. PAX LING (817) 799-9248 NEEL Assoc., INC. P.O. sox 20126 Waco, Texas 76702-0126 • HURST EQUIPMENT AND GENERATOR 326 w/ 16' hose 4GBS w/ 16' hose Manifold JL16B Paladin w/ 16' hose Omni 11 w/16' hose 60 Ram w/ 16' hose $4985.00 ea (l, $2925. 00 $;324.00 ea t $3490.00 ea i? B" $2595.00 ea $1789.00 eat DELIVERY AND INSTRUCTION INCLUDED l - 5000 watt Honda Generator $2160.00" • 1 - 5000 watt Hale Generator $2100.00" "if Purchased with our Truck DELIVERY AND INSTRUCTION INCLUDED fire, llazmal. Police d Safely Equipment (817) 799-9176 1 (800) 433-3402 24 I111. FAX LINE (917) 799-9248 F 75 TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM -MAGNOLIA BEACH The sub -committee appointed to review the proposals of engineers for their services reported they recommended the following: 1.Testingeer,Inc. 2.Balusek-Frankson 3.G & W Engineers Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that they approve the recommendations of the sub -committee. GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY -PERMITS A motion was made by Commissioner, Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried, that Calhoun County grant a permit to GBRA to install facilities as shown on the following instruments with the understanding that by the usage of such permit GBRA agrees that such facilities and the installation, maintenance and usage thereof shall be subject to all of the terms and pro- visions set out in the original contract between GBRA and Calhoun County dated March 21, 1972 and recorded in Vol. R, Page 307 of the Commissioners' Court Minutes of Calhoun County, Texas and that GBRA agrees to be bound by all such terms and provisions. 2" /d-T/i /`} T/4 1 a Z WE Z D >o yofch Line ow V�_ /yh i SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: May 8, 1991 • B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Port 0' Connor well site C. Number of Connections Wanted: D. Map Sheet Number: D19A and 18 E. Customer Number to be assigned: F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • ELECTRICAL WATER ELECTRICAL 6" F -R L 0 - WELL SI-4 V I. li mil M • • • SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/9/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Kay Hessong C. Number of Connections Wanted: 1 D. Map Sheet Number: D20B 8 20D E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2688 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 79 QQ c3a CP op to C 0 M A'DXAXNY � .. A. H �6;3 0 DISTRIBUTION, ,SYSTEM 'LAYOUT WATER ."DISTRIBUTION.. SYSTEM ..CALHOUN COUNTY TEXAS m 61 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) • A. DATE: 4/16/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Ricki C.McKinney C'. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: 020C E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2689 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: 'Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 81 z&g9 O jRck+_C - �1c Sao-a�$9 Nt020c. D m -4 m m m Irn 15th 14th I?th 0 3 , 3 m rn -i m m -I r 0 82 • E SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/16/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Larry Robison & Mark Phillips C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D19C and 19B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2690 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 100 i FILLMORE AVE. .rrr�r�rrr�ri.� i TAYLOR AVE. ul III . 100 Date: 3/ 73 waa�� r 687 E.T.Rice J II�7 M .lA. Coffey NATIONAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS 0 • SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/17/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Thomas W. Taggart C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2691 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 85 z4 n Y a r 5 Ito m ago SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/18/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Hugh A. Hawes C,. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2693 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 0� 628. - 0 L153Au �{ ap'a693 �WASHINGTON BLVD------� 0 3 0 • A A N � W SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) • A. DATE: 4-18-91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Hugh A. Hawes C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2692 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 89 a�� s+rz'c 6F'7r i -----� U LJ A s H-1 nl GToni Fi� r W r w C 0 d U Cohen oM o 0 ' s7 S o n eiw o' 727 C� me Donob CL G F Hol:heuser I t p D LA D P ' n p , 0 0 � ' t� o o v y �— Ti ocn t ` '.. SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY.RURAL HATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/24/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Henry Hutyra C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D19A and 20A E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2694 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 0 91, a- �I 14th nl D 2, a(,94 gI 7490 4 E Trott _ I I 13th i 1664 • Wharton Bones W. Klaus • 646 l` fa 8J. E 3Caoiness 9 II ii ehry N-u�,-a 19-- qq- P,19(� qW r I / " /60' 1 , m Z Z. i!.837 �! A. T. Dincons �)2 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/29/91 • B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: John A. Davenport Jr. C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20D E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2695 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: Please refer to 1st form -- #2302 is being relocated out of the alley at this time to serve #26975 TT is applicafiion). 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 93 J. A. Bishop q o-% 24 Wallace Co. Inc. 602 94 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 5/3/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Jeff I. Coats • C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20 A E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2696 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • ® ® 1-7I 781 • ti P Meier 3 • A M O I M. E Caarre" • 758 6S6 •,7 Ao i . J. T Monfgi I FN • ZIo+oO IgS� 1 l L� a ' 49671 O A. Smejkal ion - - a all e Z 4 ei®- jj J. Pickerson 110848 J �i J U Branch 789011 I) C. W Cammack 7250 I loTN �I z W M. Hicks 701 • II 1i 96 ' "• • • • SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 4/8/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service• John J. Michalec C. Number of Connections Wanted: one b. Map Sheet Number: D18 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2697 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature a MW i V� W ri "t :-I 2/87' a ---- j I: I John (Y11 Cha Le e- �9 a�9 7 I' D Is • w MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER- CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried, that as per the recommenda- tion of Page, Southerland, Page Architects, the construction bid for Phase I, expansion of Memorial Medical Center, be awarded to the low bidder of Don Krueger Construction Co. • of Victoria,Texas and that the contract award be for the following: Base bid: $5,030,000.00 Alternate No. l(Addition of Physical therapy & cardiology) 200,000.00 Alternate No. 2 (Addition of Business office) 98,000.00 Alternate No. 4(Addition of stand-by chilled water pump & condenser water pump) 12,000.00 Contract Award Amount $5,340,000.00 and that the County Judge be authorized to execute the construction contract. PLEASE FIND COPY OF CONTRACT IN VOLUME 10 PAGE 331 CONTRACT FOR OFFICE SPACE- AG BUILDING A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn that the contract with The State of Texas Acting by and through the State Purchasing and General Service Commission for office space at the Agricultural Building, for the benefit of the Texas Department of Health, and the County Judge be authorized to sign the contract. Motion carried. • State Lease 501-6664-E3-PORT LAVACA Negotiated Contract for Space This agreement is entered into by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the State Purchasing and General Services Commission (hereinafter referred to as State), for the benefit of the Texas Department of Health, and the County of Calhoun (hereinafter referred to as County), pursuant to the authority granted by Section 6.05 of Article 601b, Texas Civil Statutes. I. The County agrees to provide to the State approximately 316 square feet of office space in the Agricultural Building, Room 7, County Road 101, Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas. The -premises shall be used by the State for the administration of programs and delivery of services pursuant to State Law. The County will provide and pay for all utilities (except i telephone) for the necessary operation of the occupying agency. The County shall also provide janitorial services for the space occupied by the State. II. This lease contract is made and entered into in accordance with the provisions of Article 601b, Sections 6 & 7, and Article 8309g, Texas Civil Statutes, and is made contingent upon the continuation of federally funded programs or upon the availability of State funds appropriated by the Legislature to cover the full term and cost of this lease. The State agrees to pay Lessor not more than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per month during the term of the lease. IV. The term of this lease shall be for 40 mon1.lis commencing on the 1st day of January, 1990 and ending on the 31st day of December 1993, unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided. Upon mutual agreement of both parties in writing, this lease may be extended for an additional term of up to 48 months under the same terms and conditions. 0; 1AN Page 2 State Lease 501-6664-E3-PORT LAVACA • V. The County agrees to provide all maintenance required for the general upkeep of the exterior of the building, and ground maintenance. VI. This lease shall comply with Category C accessiblility requirements as described on the attached "Minimum Requirements for Accessibilitity for the Handicapped for those Privately -Owned Buildings and Facilities leased by State Agencies, Under the Provisions of Article 601b, Texas Civil Statutes". Lessor: Lessee: Calhoun County The State of Texas Acting by and through the Acting by and through the Calhoun County Commission s Court State Purchasing and General Service Commission P By: By: / (el/i'i:-casti�5� t . Norman Donelson County Judge Acting State Lease Officer • Date: May 13, 1991 ND:ALF:mn Attachment • 101 I I IN IN"NI itI(III IIt EMI:\'1'S FOR ACCF.351111 I.ITI FOR 'I IIt: II.%NIsl(-31'1'I.D [OR Ilionic PRIt AI'ELN-MAM:1) lit11.D1\I:S %N)/ FAC 11.11 It I I.ASFD III S I IF AG F,SCI E.S. I NIJER I III, 1'RO s ISIONS OF ARIICI-E 6011), ITCS The proasums of the tau were coined to funher the Pdiq of site Sure Of Texas In encourage ad promote the rehabilitation of luendmapprd in disabled cnimin. d ou nog. im119r is pnstblr. mAm'c•gn bane,, rn:ooumeseJ by aged. handicapped or disnhlyd Pennm. -hose ahthty in engage m gainful rctupmions or In achtese not personal independence is nadlassh restricted when such persons 'annnt rcadih u.e pubic buildings. It is she intent of Iheu requirements In make all buildings and facilities leased by sure agencio accessbte In. and functional for, else phy>iolla handicupprJ. m, Through and unhm ihmr dour, unhout loss of function, spat or facilities. These standards and •p ,uwariom shall he aJheud to in all buildings leased or sensed in whole or in pan lot use by the state under any lease or rental agreement entered into on or after tannin 1. 1972. 10 such extent as Is not contraindicated by federal law us below the Power of the atau'+ uguluions, mere mndards shall also apply to buildings or facilities leased or rented far use by site state through partial or Total use m federal funds. If it is determined b, the State Purchasing and General Services Commision that full complianu with Accessibility forme physically handicapped is "applicable. them shall be substantial compliance w ids all sections relited to ingress and egress so the building or facility To the maximum extent considered aPpmpeiue, N'here it is delimited by the Commission than an exception of compliance with the ace",ibifp for the phy-catty handicapped applies, such determination shall be W forth in the eyalostion. ALL STATE AGENCY LEASES WILL BE GROUPED IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES (A) FULL COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (B) COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS RELATING TO INGRESS AND EGRESS (C) COMPLIANCE NOT REQUIRED CATEGORIES A. B. and C HAZARDS - Hazardous conditions such as open mtdtoles, unsecured access panels. grainµ, Jury hanging objects, or pmtrudtng ob,ucl,,, should be avoided. CATEGORIES A and B - IN ADDITION TO ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS SITE DEVELOPVENT tA) Entrances - Wheelchair access to at least one prime entrance is required. If it lent one prmtar. entrance is not at ground level. proper ramps or other mechanical devices to schieve accessi iliN is required. (B) Parking - If parking spices are included In the beau agreement. an appropriate number (minimum of one) shall be soluble for whm Ichai, nun. Such spaces nWi be a lull 12 fen 'lot uacmpl parallel parking). shall he accessible and toeveNem to die facility, end shall be identified for on by individuate with physical disabilities. Appropriate identification On not be blocked when a vehicle it parked in Ind spat. Curb beaks or ramp mum be provided H neenury for accembdity to the faNiry. (q Approach - Each walk necemry to approach an accessible primary enmiue times designatedparking parking end passenger loading mines shall be a criminuws esignals surface, ram Imertupmr by naps sir abrupt than(" in level and should be as great eS inches wide. Any such walk with a gradient in excess of 6% shall be comidemd a rasp. RA,IIPS - When ramps ire required to insure access day mot, Confmm W ties fWbwinµ (A) Minimum width of aS inches unless otherwise approved by me Commissim. (By Slope must he oo Vessel than 8.33% Of 1-fail rise in a 12-fret inn was the mximme, m without a rut platform Io be 30 fat. Slopes exceeding 1:12 No shoe tamps are pemmeg with Commbsion approved. ICI Ramps old, a inn of six fen or more mull hove handrails on tech side ed appmximalaly 32 inches, and extend at lease 11 inches beyond the lop and bosom. Ramps of Ins than sits feel in Tinged dal not require Aandraih except where drO"If hazards care. The design of a Itandmil +hid be +moods and allow for in any grip. If handrail, tie mnsnud djKem in a or a will. a minimum of bed inch clearance must De hodim.ased. (D) Shall have a surface that is ex ip. (E) Shall have level landings at the top and broom deed are at lease 601nehn in least with a width 1u permit sufficient area for adequate marauverabdiry in a whencbalr. (i.e. Whin degree swing one onto the landing. a 60 inch depth with a 24 inch so muvrnbJiry crommce a Mike side of door is sufficient.) ENTRANCES AND DOORS (AI Entrance doors ad chore to essigmble spaces dtould have minimum sine Openinµ of 32 inches: howevet. Iwo-fom. cilia -inch Boon am acceptable if they suing 90 sanddegrees or moee swill allow straight line passage. If double leaf doors are provided. than in Intel ice dull be a minMum of sxo-foot. etShnimhes in widen. (B) Thresholds shall not be raised thou man 3nt imh above end [vet of the none go salter chile. Thrcehokts helueen I14 inch and 3/e inch shall have beveled edge+. CORRIDORS - hfinimum consider width is 43lrecbm+ Short Puugawsys may be 36 lionera wide swap when they lead to door and or odor wren where maauverinS clauanet is required. STAIRS - Steps connecting keels ran accessible by elevator, Or other mnhnl"1 lift devices, shell comply As follows: (A) Have uniform rise, heights and tad depths. IB) Nainµ should we be abmpt or project mom due 1 H inch". A When them and four or more steps in a mries they +hail here at leul oat Ism" did Is gripped red saunters a minimum of 12 im as and the sop ies batons ricer, tie eta b an cue" stud would crate a battered (cement and be parallel top adb theking mfka). When haMnBl arc mounted djuu, b IX em wail wham, a minimum d 1 N each m rsaue moat be minion. FLOORS - Flooes on a given slaty mum be of a cotnnww level theaShaut ad have a surface end is ro -liP. Change in levels between 'i high mill R Inch shall base beveled exists. Change, to kvels greater stun ff inch still Comply with rump crir"u. PUBLIC TELEPHONT S - If coinopenrd elephmn an mvided, at leap one Accessible m r shall be marred w that she upper mua mail (loin slat. did a handuq is oo highea dean N (a) inch" from the time. ``�� (m) Thk mexknum height my tr mended in 34 Inch" if them is a dear floor arm of sufficient else kraiinauly 3 feel by 3 fees) in fund of the Resume chat will Palmer a side appeouh with ELEVATORS.Whc envies occupy spa local float in a mule- lory Wilding, all Passenger class u follows: (A) SIWI have s minimum dear dam width of 3 (B) Shall h n, a minimum in,tJe am of one tau d I., than SI Inches. (C) All eIXWo1 devices must be within ill (a) Intl location of control, as each dot a person in a rl A mxhm height of 34 inch" is acceptable to- (D) Shall bare mixed or incised lento and some Refer to Ideneifica ion for the Blind for ipecifv IE) Shall have at least on, hadrut nwue,,4 ss apt Boor. There maill he a minimum of I16 inch cla sam he isccli the wall and the Md. IDENTI7CATION FOR THE BLIND - R"mtostn shag he. identifying fumr". Specific urn which are intended m be accessible illthe blind may are be required Io here appropriate identification. (A) Raised or imasd linen and.'or members shall be at Insist 3/8 Inch but oo mare than 2 Inches In height with a minimum relief of 1/32 inch. Ireland cNracun shall have a minimum was width of 'a inch. (01 Door (raoml Identification should be placed an die with on the handle side. approximately 60 inches above the floor. WARNING SIGNALS - If emergenc) warring eigub exact. they shag be bosh audible and vasud. (A) If Tome an exhaust, devices suitable for emgeary, w'am all may be required As special eandiiiou of ON modes t. (a) Exit lights or signs shoobA ba mBkd As identify call roues and doom. SPECIAL USE AREAS - All usu and noregriwr which art kumude4 foe me by the Occupying allermy- most be Accelrible and ucwmodedng an wheelchair At Such Amu my' Include. but ere nes Bmited to: specator ems: lemma hills; la6aamriu: libraries: stadia -visual control mosrn; housing; and cmfmee room. CATEGORY A - IN ADDITION TO ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS TOILET ROOMS - It is essential rhal sen appropriate ammberOfeager roues, in accordance with the mare tad me Of a apeN(ate buldthg or (acuity. bat made Kasaable to, and usable by On Physically lan0{oppd (A) Toilet romm, slsall live duties in accordance wish above specificatios, W shall Wvc imanior space as smsim b allo , mKw: of Wastelands is rhcelchein. (BI Tad" soots that cosmic culls shag have a kends oat sold dos: (1) had a minimum 32 inch amward opening don: (1) it a minimum of 36 inch ride tad m ku dull 16 imbn dap. A minimum of 66 lecher, In"is preferred; OI hn 1 weer 910111 mmred wide she sea 17 b )9 IKM Bun the Boot: (4) ban at lean two re-bo ngBy nbmied gob boa 3) Its 36 "an above the Boa. Grab bars min be I Y an 1 H inches in cabide diaaeue ridi 1 H imnha closer Inewom Mils and .0113. (C) The bind mama should love a ken one levaay mmmd with a 29to 31 inch clearance uaderaadn. mnbrd from site floor b bosom dapros. Srndeed lsmwy hei t k acceptable who bike rgrwn space ad taifgmalks ri0 es line a rbakbaeme b. mate al ma spproacA. At Inn 60 IKhea Kfmi it- hgrg k -asked fha such an of. IDI Wheal urbals ge era. 1. sir lean as shell is c dal optic{ d tin boil i h am, than 17 incMa Ran The /lo. In wine e,cUnd wale as from can love 11 trills if the I. 1. aemubk water clout she dal tee eacemo 11 inches (solo she Roor u sin lop of me bowl. (E) An appropriate member of rowel dor. At it shelves ad ualu mull be roomed ro hither mho 46 re) irchec from Use Dar. At kau oat mina aNl tr mwnsd b vial the bosom I, tw hither don M inches from dal Ilhor. WATER FOUMAINS- Where mmer gmedaim and M.Wd, aTimagesseemumbra but ken one IAYI have had-operad consols within us7'reach da permits=a wheelchair and mud have An UP -from spout wo higheron b36 miles hmo she Bea. Div amaiibk waste dispeming means my be accepted wader «rain comolled tadidcmn SWITCHES AND COMROLS - Sriwb" and calmots whieh are himm ed to be operable by site mugm far imaging a—MW use shall be loobd m hiStrcmm IS (e) inches flan she Boa. This spates is subject to inspection by doe Sue Pusclwky and Gesnal Senicn Commission (tar complua nwins data eccmihdier reWirem m u coquild by Ankle 601b. V.T.C.S. r� U • • 102 FLOOD INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD -APPOINTMENTS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn and seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that Erwin Hermes and James Dworaczyk who are presently serving on the Board be re -appointed. CALHOUN COUNTY AIRPORT- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -APPOINTMENTS • A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that John Winder and Alvin Hahn who are presently serving on the board, be re -appointed. Commissioner Hahn abstained. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT BOARD -APPOINTMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that Henry Barber be re- appointed to the Emergency Communications District Board. BIDS & PROPOSALS - LIBRARY - COPIER A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk, and carried that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for bids for a copier for the new library with the bid opening to be June 10t h,_1991.___ BIDS & PROPOSALS- PICK-UP - PCT. 1 • A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for bids for a new pick-up truck for Precinct No. 1, with bid opening to be June 10, 1991. PORT O'CONNOR FIRE STATION -ADDITION After some discussion Commissioner Hahn agreed to. head.. a committee to further study the addition to the Port O'Connor Fire Station and to give a report to the Court May 31, 1991. No action was taken. - MOVE TO OLD LIBRARY BUILDING Marian Rhodes appeared in behalf of the Calhoun County Historical Commission requesting some repairs be made to the old Library building before the contents of the museum are moved over, that a telephone be left there, that they extend the hours to include Saturday morning. Judge Hartzog requested they make a list of the things needed and present it to the court for their consideration. isNo action was taken. COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT The County Treasurer presented her monthly report and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried, that said report be approved. 1. 103 PORT O'CONNOR AMBULANCE - EOUIPMENT • Commissioner Hahn informed the Court that $2,091.50 would be needed or equipment for the new ambulance for Port O'Connor. No action was taken. TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT The Tax Assessor -Collector presented her monthly report for March, and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried, that said report be approved. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED -COUNTY Claims totaling $257,948.76 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL • Claims totaling $2,070.69 for the Hospital Indigent Health- care Fund were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same a Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that said claims be approved for payment. BUDGET AMENDMENT - SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried, that the following Budget Amendment be approved. • FDA BUDGET AMENDMEN-r REOUEST III l-o! Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From- /��1�� > !j i �//O� v(A�,.0 l.(.tre"/Le°t• n LfJ . �eu/Oh—r`Y�� (Department making this request) Date! J -/3 - 9/ I request an amendment to the /0 91 __ budget for the (year) following line items in my department! Amendment uL Account H Account Hama Amount Reason Y Yi'YYYYYYM1M1M1M1 YYYYFY".Y YNYYYYYNY"Y M1YgqYYNYYYYYYYY NYM1Y YNY'YYYM1YY YYYM1 YM1 CU-</S -VD S(vU/ uGicE SuPPLI[ S oCj SO0.0 6 0VE,C'.WsJ 0/-<IS _I/p-6e Iql "/e/SO1&4A/CC-"t L,Arl. Net change In total budget for • this department ins Other remarl<s/justification: is # 'CT mvavmvamavmram -1'OL1cC .SuFPt./ES flecou ,JT QVr--2 D2Awj i 1 understand that my budget cannot be amended as reques Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature or of head: Date of Commis5ionq,{As' approval! Date posted to General Ledger account(s)t THE COURT RECESSED UNTIL FRIDAY, MAY IT, 1991 AT 10:00 A.M. REGULAR MAY TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I HELD MAY 17, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 17th day of May, A.D, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 whereupon the following proceedings were had: The opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance were led by Judge Hartzog. EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLE Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court accept the recommendation of Henry Barber and accept the bid of Taylor Made Ambulances, the low bidder, in the amount of $54,670.00. UTILITY EASEMENT- GTE - PCT. 3 & PCT 4 Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried, that a permit be granted to General Telephone Co. to bury cable in Pct. 3 & Pct.4, at the following locations, and authorize the County Judge to sign. r� u • • -06 MC 600647 ED-135 (REV.1-88) • ® GTE Southwest Incorporated NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION LINE INSTALLATION DATE May 6, 1991 TO THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY ATTENTION COUNTY JUDGE: Hp4tard G. Hartzog Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Formal notice is hereby given that GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED will construct a communication line within the right-of-way of a County Road in CALHOUN County, PALACIOS, TEXAS as follows: Beginning approximately 7,795' south of the Jackson and Calhoun County Line, GTE proposes to place a buried cable along Schicke Point Road. The new cable will be placed 8' west of the east right-of-way and extend for an approximate distance of 6,342' south to Hughes Street. Beginning approximately 1,248' east of the northeast corner of the intersection of Schicke Point Road and E. Cedar Lane, GTE proposes to place a buried cable along E. •Cedar Lane. The new cable will be placed 4' south of the north right-of-way and extend for an approximate distance of 848' east. All road crossings will be bored and conduit placed. Cable depth will be 36" below natural ground. The location and description ottaMe� Sketck- p f this ine an associated appurtenances is more fully shown by three (3) copies of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the County Road right-of-way in accordance with governing laws. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is expressly understood that tender of this notice by the GTE Southwest Incorporated does not constitute a waiver, surrender, abandonment or impairment of any property rights, franchise, easement, license, authority, permission, privilege or right now granted by law or may be granted in the future and any provision or provisions so construed shall be null and void. Construction of this line will begin on or after July 2, 1991 . GTE M iT INC7PORATED SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP Address P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTCM, TEXAS 512/387-6037 107 CONCURRED • TO: GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED ATTENTION: DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 The Commissioner's Court of CALHOUN County offers no objections to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed buried communications line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated May 6, 1991 except as noted below. It is further intended that the Commissioner's Court may require the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30) days written notice. • The installation shall not damage any part of the County Road and adjacent property owners. Please notify ,telephone Commissioner of Precinct No. jkfa_�_, forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line, in order that we may have a representative present. Commissioner's Court of County, Texas, acting herein by and through the County Judge and all the Commissioners pursuant to resolution passed on the day of , 19 q 1 , and duly recorded in the Minute Book of the Commissioner's Court of County, Texas. OUNTY JUDGE 1�8 IL 1.1L. O� 11, F FRANCITASI --F LA %�ARD -B-L E SS I W As FIELD: v WAR6\. LWR D ZONE 4 ... M FIELD ZONE -3 INSET VWEPHAVAt A K' us ;r-A4 CARA C.6 m GAS Ed cop..KN 51 49 f IS INSET arw . . . . . . . . . . 7-�, w I I MAT OAS A. —El CA Club It chic" WORK LXATIM X 11�"MA ll rim Su I 109 _ _couury _ COUNT4 14UG14ES ARKA ouLF COAST TAXI. gDsa1 r DLd DAT[/�-91 DRAIMR BY DLC DA7[_w--1q1 APPROVE CY�OATI T"•91 - - REVISED Uy DA+E SCALE N0� 4' EXISTING CMLE NEW O-ABLE �• E. CEDAR LN. iTr ® Southwest pTM GILMUUN LWUN/7-NUi BURIED MOLE 1 1 w. D. Ro. 6 E MC 600660 ED-172(REV.1.88) 110 MC 600647 ED-135 (REV.1-88) CJ • ® GTE Southwest NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION Incorporated LINE INSTALLATION DATE 04-29-91 TO THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY ATTENTION COUNTY JUDGE: Howard G. Hartzoo Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Formal notice is hereby given that GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED will construct a communication line within the right-of-way of a County Road in CAL110UN County, -_ SEADRIFT,_TEXAS,— as follows: Beginning at GTE Station 15+45 which is located approximately 409' west of the intersection of Hwy 185 and Pine Street, GTE proposes to place a buried conr.unications cable. The cable will be placed 5' south of the south right-of-way on Pine Street then east to Station 17+29 where a cable will break off and go south on a paved city street. This cable will be placed 3' east of the west right-of-way to Station 6+22. From Station 17+29 on Pine Street, we will bore the paved road and place one 4" PVC pipe for 35'. We will continue to Station 19+54 where it junctions on State Hwy 185. All private drives will be open cut and all right-of-way would be restored to original condition. All cable will have a minimum cover of 36". See Attached Sketch. The location and description of this line and associated appurtenances is more fully shown by three (3) copies of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the County Road right-of-way in accordance with governing laws. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is expressly understood that tender of this notice by the GTE Southwest Incorporated does not constitute a waiver, surrender, abandonment or impairment of any property rights, franchise, easement, license, authority, permission, privilege or right now granted by law or may be granted in the future and any provision or provisions so construed shall be null and void. Construction of this line will begin on or after June 17, 19_91 GTE SOUTH ES INCORPOR TED By DAVID J. C:USTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP Address P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 783 • 512/387-6037 III CONCURRED TO: GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED ATTENTION: DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP P. O. BOX 1112 R0BST0[9N, TEXAS 78380 The Commissioner's Court of CMIOUN County offers no objections to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed buried communications line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated 04-29-91 except as noted below. It is further intended that the Commissioner's Court may require the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30 0 days written notice. The installation shall not damage any part of the County Road and adjacent property owners. Please notify , telephone Commissioner of Precinct No. ' forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line, in order that we may have a representative present. Commissioner's Court of County, Texas, acting herein by and through the County Judge and all the Commissioners pursuant to resolution passed on the —1.7a day of , 19 91 and duly recorded in the Minute Book of the Commissioner's Court of ect_� County, Texas. 112 _ '�.STP.FiiCS Ester �' aoa.� eo.e�rvi coru� Q.Q AID 3 6r& e LL MC 600647 ED-135 (REV.1.88( ® GTE Southwest NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION Incorporated LINE INSTALLATION TO THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF CALHOUN DATE May 7, 1991 COUNTY ATTENTION COUNTY JUDGE: Howard G. Hartzno Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas Formal notice is hereby given that GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED will construct a communication line within the right-of-way of a County Road in CAIMIN County, SEADRIFP TEXAS as follows: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE AND SKETCH. The location and description of this line and associated appurtenances is more fully shown by three (3) copies of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the County Road right-of-way in accordance with governing laws. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is expressly understood that tender of this notice by the GTE Southwest Incorporated does not constitute a waiver, surrender, abandonment or impairment of any property rights, franchise, easement, license, authority, permission, privilege or right now granted by law or may be granted in the future and any provision or provisions so construed shall be null and void. Construction of this line will begin on or after June 19 91 • GTE SOUTHV�E$fi INCORp.(3RATED By DAVID J. CUSI'ER SENIOR ENGINEER — OSP Address P. 0. BOX 1112 • ROBSTOM, TEXAS 78380 512/387-6037 ,_ 114 • CALHOUN COUNTY NARRATIVE MAY 7, 1991 PERMIT - GATES RD. Beginning at GTE Station 29 + 79 which is located at the northeast corner of Gates Road and State Highway 185, GTE proposes to place a buried communications cable. From Station 29 + 79, the cable will be placed 3.5' south of the north right-of-way. The proposed cable will be placed east along Gates Road to GTE Station 49 + 93 where it will tie into our existing cable. Beginning again at GTE Station 54 + 51, we will again place a cable on the same 3.5' right-of-way alignment. At Station 58 + 67, we will backhoe the dry creek bed and place one 4" PVC pipe for the distance of 140'. We will maintain a minimum of 48" of cover through the creek bed. At Station 76 + 58 we will bore Braun Road and place one 4" PVC pipe for a distance of 60'. At GTE station 77 + 83, we will bore south under Gates Road and place one 4" PVC pipe for a distance of 30', we will place a communica- tions cable south across the right of way of gates road for 100' where we will tie into our existing cable. This new cable will be placed 7' west of the right-of-way of Loop Road. From Station 77 + 83 located along the north right-of-way of Gates Road, our main feeder cable will continue east at the 3.5' right-of-way alignment. • At Station 88 + 54, we will place a buried cable north 7' east of the west right-of-way of Wooldridge to Station 24 + 75. From Station 88 + 54 located along the north right-of-way of Gates Road, we will continue east with our main cable route to Station 88 + 78 where we will bore Wooldridge Rd. we will place PVC pipe under Wooldridge Rd. for a distance of 60'. From this point our cable will continue east to Station 106 + 24 where we will backhoe through the creek bed and place one 4" PVC pipe for 160'. This PVC pipe will have a minimum cover of 48". At Station 107 + 99, we will cross south under Gates Road to Station 108 + 46. At this crossing, we will utilize our existing 2" galvanized pipe. From Station 108 + 46, our cable will be placed towards the east to Station 117 + 65, where we will tie into our existing cable. Through this stretch of cable beginning at Station 108 + 46, our cable will be placed 3.5' north of the south right-of-way. All new cable will have a minimum cover of 36" depth unless otherwise noted: All right of way will be restored to original condition and all private drives will be open cut. • .. 115 CONCURRED TO: GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED ATTENTION; DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 The Commissioner's Court of CALHOUN County offers no objections to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed buried communications line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated May 7, 1991 except as noted below. It is further intended that the Commissioner's Court may require the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30) days written notice. The installation shall not damage any part of the County Road and adjacent property owners. Please notify telephone i Commissioner of Precinct No. , forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line, in order that we may have a representative present. Commissioner's Court of (1,A114c"t) County, Texas, acting herein by and through the County Judge and all the Commissioners pursuant to resolution passed on the �l --- 14 day of/ , 19 / 1 and duly recorded in the Minute Book of the Commissioner's Court of • 116 • PLATS OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY SEADRIFT, TEXAS PAGES 117 & 118 • • 117 • • • 118 • • TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT -CONTRACT Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the County enter into a contract with Testingeers for all basic services for Texas Community Development Project not to exceed $16,900.00, and the County Judge be authorized to sign•the contract. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the minutes of the April 8th, 9th, 12th and 30th Commissioners Court meetings be approved. Leroy B 1k, Commis ion Pct.l Oscar Ha n,Commissioner Pct. Rw w d G.5az-og--,Co4rfty Judge Marltene Paul, County Clerk APPRAISERS -CHOCOLATE BAYOU PARK Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula that Raulie Irwin, Jr. and Gail Parker be accepted as appraisers for the Chocolate Bayou Park for a fee not to exceed $500.00 each per parcel, there being eight parcels for a total of $4000.00 for each appraiser, for a total of $8000.00. MEDICAL RECORDS BUILDING -ASBESTOS DISPOSAL Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner and carried that the County Judge be authorized to contract for the removal and disposal of asbestos from the Memorial Medical Records building on the premises of Memorial Medical Center for a fee not to exceed $5,000.00. TAX ASSESSOR -COPIER Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the County Tax Assessor be authorized to pay for a new copier in the amount of $2495.00 from the Voter Registration Fund. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Claims totaling $100,469.13 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was • made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried, that said claims be approved. THE COURT ADJOURNED. 119 SPECIAL MAY TERM HELD MAY 21, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I • BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 21st day of May, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 9:00 A.M. a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Stanley Mikula Commissioner Pet. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk Leroy Belk, Commissioner, Pct. 1 was not present. whereupon the following proceedings were held: The meeting was opened in the Commissioners' Courtroom and due to the size of the attendance, was recessed for five minutes and re -convened in the District Courtroom , Courtroom A. Judge Hartzog led the opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. Judge Hartzog asked that the following transcript of the proceedings by Kirsten W. Eppinger, Certified Shorthand Reporter for the State • of Texas be entered into -the Commissioners' Court minutes. 0, 120 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 • 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • HEARING BEFORE THE CALHOUN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Tuesday, May 21, 1991 1 121 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Tuesday, May 21, 1991 (Commencing at 9:03 a.m.) JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: This meeting will reconvene. I would like for everyone to rise for prayer, please. (Prayer & Pledge of Allegiance.) JUDGE IiOWARD IiARTZOG: Let the record show that Commissioner Hahn, Commissioner Mikula and Commissioner Smith is present. Commissioner Belk is not present. The subject matter of this meeting is as follows: To consider and take necessary action after hearing report relative to cattle grazing on Matagorda Island. The style in which this report and fact finding mission of this court will be done is as follows. We will hear a presentation from U.S. Fish & Wildlife 2 122 C • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 M EJ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Service, Mr. Brent Giezentanner and others. We will then hear a presentation by Dr. Sam Beasom with the Welder Wildlife Refuge. I will then allow Mr. Joe Hawes to make comments that he would like to make. Then I will allow an opportunity for Dr. Beasom and Brent Giezentanner to discuss the issues. After they have discussed their issues then the County Commissioners if they have any questions for the participants then I will allow questions from the floor from the audience but they must be directed to the Commissioners Court and then whoever will have an opportunity to answer both sides to answer his question. So at this time I would like to call on Brent Giezentanner with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to make his presentation. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Do we need to identify our position? JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: As it relates the subject at hand cattle grazing on Matagorda Island and your position so the court reporter can get your information. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: As I outlined in my letter to you which I assume you received by now I did not intend to come in here and debate the biology of the issue of cattle grazing. I think that has been 3 123 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 fairly well outlined in the Compatibility Determination which Iprepared and which I also presented to the all members of this Court and to the grazing permittee some time ago. I do want to give you a rundown on where we are on the administrative parts of the decision and the things that have transpired to date and let you know what's going on in that arena. A little history. On March 2, 1990 I notified Mr. Hawes that I was not going to renew his grazing permit for Matagorda Island because I determined that it was incompatible for the purposes for which that area was established. In other words, for the benefit of Migratory Birds and Endangered Species in that letter to Mr. Hawes on March 2, 1990. I should back up a little further and point out that Mr. Hawes' current permit that he had had expired on December 31, 1989. And the action to not renew a permit was not a revoking of a permit or privilege it was simply a decision on our part to not renew an annual permit for grazing on the island. We offered Mr. Hawes a rather extensive exhaustive appeal process so that the decision I made could be reviewed by several levels within the Fish & Wildlife Service and Mr. Hawes did take advantage of 0 124 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 that appeals process resulting in three levels of appeal. His first level of appeal was to me. I reviewed the additional information he provided and I denied his appeal. He then appealed to my supervisor's boss, Assistant Regional Director Joe Mazonni, who reviewed the information. He denied the appeal and it was elevated then to the regional director of the Fish & Wildlife Service in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Mr. Hawes and his lawyers requested that the regional director recuse himself -- in other words, excuse himself from making the final decision on the appeal due to some previous involvement that the regional director may have had in discussions on the whole grazing issue on Matagorda. And the regional director did remove himself from the the process and elevated the appeals to the Washington level and the final decision was assigned to the Deputy Director of the Fish & Wildlife Service, Richard Smith. Richard Smith came out to Victoria, Texas and heard Mr. Hawes' final appeal on November 16. On January 7 he issued his final decision in accordance with the laws that the Refuge Administration Act and other laws that apply to the operation of the National Wildlife Refuge System and my decision to terminate 5 125 1 2 3 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the grazing activity on Matagorda were upheld by the Washington office. And by letter of January 7, 1991 Mr. Hawes was notified that he would have 90 days to remove his cattle from the island. He appealed that decision -- he appealed the 90 days, requested an additional 90 days which.was granted and his grazing permit then was extended until July 7 the purpose of giving him adequate time to remove his livestock from the island. Which means it will be some 18 months since his actual permit expired until Mr. Hawes is to have his cattle off of the Matagorda Island. We are in that waiting period for the July 7 at this time. I have advised Mr. Hawes on some five or six occasions that we have relocation systems available if he would like to avail himself of those systems. The federal government can pick up and the taxpayers can pick up the tab for most of the expense of relocating his livestock off of Matagorda Island. I have not heard from Mr. Hawes at this point as to whether he wants to take advantage of that. Perhaps I will be hearing pretty soon because we need to get moving pretty soon on that if we are to be able to help him. Because we sincerely do want to do what we can to alleviate as much of the trauma of this decision as possible because we fully recognize that this has a E 126 r� • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 severe impact on his operation on his livelihood. It also has an impact on him and his family emotionally. And we want to do what we can to lessen that as much as we can and still live up to the law that we are charged with which is to manage the National Wildlife Refuge System within the confines of compatibility as laid out by Congress. Now I provided members of this Court, I believe, the final decision that was reached by Deputy Director Smith and I also provided County Judge, Judge Hartzog with copies of the director's testimony before Congress on march 21 which reaffirms the decision and points out some of the legalities that we are required to deal with in operation of a National Wildlife Refuge System and we believe that the law is fairly clear in this matter. It does not give us much option or any option to allow uses on National Wildlife Refuges that we believe in our biological opinion are in conflict with the resources that we are supposed be managing. I recognize that there is a debate regarding the biology of this issue. Our position is that we can demonstrate harm occurring to the island from the cattle grazing and that when that harm is demonstrated then we have no choice but to disallow the activity 7 127 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 when we are dealing with things such as granting a grazing privilege to a private individual on public lands. And that's basically our position. And later on I will be happy to answer any questions -- specific questions that people may have. I question in my mind whether there is a lot of merit in going into a great deal of detail on the biology of the matter because I believe the sides are very well polarized on this issue and I question whether anything useful will come out of those discussions. But I will be happy to answer any specific questions on that matter. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Mr. Giezentanner, you mention that you can demonstrate harm for an operation that is continued for some 150 years and some time past. I think that given that this is precisely the question that we are here to try to develop some information on, for the purpose of developing a comprehensive record for the purpose of having the information before the public so that they can be allowed to make some sort of determination based on some of the facts that can be presented as to an issue which is in dispute. It is quite clear that the federal government has one position and generally folks from Washington take different positions. But 0 128 • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 LIU 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 it is also clear that there are people here who have different positions. Now would you like to have any of your other papers that you have delivered to this court entered into the record at this time? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I would like to have all of the documents that I presented to you in that letter. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Now this letter is your letter dated May 16, 1991. Would you like to read this letter for these purposes or would you like to just submit it by title? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I can submit it by title. That's fine. I have no objection to reading it if you would like it read into the record but -- this is going to be a rather lengthy meeting as it is I assume. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: The purpose is to try to have some sort of basis for decisions. We have got a number of very lengthy documents that talk about this and talk about that biological determination. Yet the biology in itself is somewhat in dispute which is why we have different sides to this situation. And I think that it would be important for the people gathered here because basically what people understand the people of this county, the people of this state, P 129 2 3 4 5 C 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 is simply what is happening in our backyard and how does it relate to the biology and the ecology of what's going on? As we can see, people make determinations but what are they making these determinations on that affect our lives and the lives of people we know? It is clearly important that we have some sorts of information so that we can feel very comfortable with the decisions that are made. Especially when it is a situation where there are facts which are in dispute and biologists will say one thing and biologists will say another thing and people then as our system of government has come down to the fact that the people are allowed to make decisions after hearing some of the facts. This is part of the guarantees that were guaranteed us by the Constitution. A situation of the people by the people and for the people and somehow in this whole process the people of Calhoun County have simply been dealt out and are trying to at least get a handle on what facts are being really put in evidence with regard to the biology of cattle grazing, an activity which has gone on for 150 years. What would you like them to respond to? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Perhaps I should read 10 130 11 • I the letter into the record if you don't mind. I would 2 like to preface this by saying that I'm paid by the 3 federal government and all the taxpayers of the 4 country to be a land manager. I was hired because of 5 my particular qualifications to do that job and I feel 6 like I am very well qualified and there's a paragraph 7 in this letter to that effect. That's what you are 8 paying me for. It is not a decision where in a sense 9 what goes on on a refuge is an outright democracy. It 10 is not going to be a majority rules decision on what 11 happens on a National Wildlife Refuge because Congress • 12 has but the same very strict specific guidelines on me 13 as a Wildlife Refuge manager that says what I can and 14 can't allow on a National Wildlife Refuge. So what 15 the public may want in a particular area may not be 16 what Congress says we can allow. And I want to make 17 sure that that is clear on this issue here. Majority 18 doesn't necessarily rule because majority already 19 ruled when Congress was elected and they passed 20 certain laws that says this is how we have to operate. 21 Okay. I will read the letter in its entirety. 22 "The Regional Realty Office has advised me that 23 the revenue sharing checks were mailed from 24 Albuquerque yesterday. I expect to receive them in • 25 Saturday's mail and I will deliver them to probably 131 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the Commissioners' Court in the May 21, 1991 special session discussed below." Excuse me, I need to put my glasses on. "Copies of the enclosed Compatibility Determination were previously provided last year to each member of the Commissioners' Court and to your predecessor, Judge Hernandez. In case you don't have a personal copy, I thought you might like one. This report documents the decision I made to not renew Mr. Hawes' permit and provides biological and background information in support of the decision. Since the document has already been provided to the court and it provides a summary of the information I used to make the decision, I have serious reservations whether a 'debate' on the merits of the issue will serve any useful purpose. I believe that Mr. Hawes, the commissioners and I have all clearly stated our positions on the matter and I doubt that presenting the biology of the issue yet again will change anyone's mind. There is too much emotion affecting each person's position for there to be much benefit from saying it all over again. Therefore, I plan to restrict my participation in the May 21, 1991 meeting to providing you with information on the status of the action. I will of course be happy to answer any 12 132 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • 13 specific questions you and or the court may have about the matter. "Enclosed are copies of the final decision on Mr. Hawes' appeal (I believe the commissioners already have copies of this document) and five copies (for you and each commissioner) of the testimony presented to Congress on March 21, 1991 by the director of the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, John Turner, regarding secondary uses of the National Wildlife Refuge System. This testimony discusses how the Fish & Wildlife Service plans to resolve the problem of incompatible uses on refuges that were identified in previous Congressional and General Accounting Office studies and reports. In addition, I have enclosed a single copy for you of the September 1989, GAO Report to Congress (blue cover) on incompatible uses and a single copy of the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service's response to Congress. I would appreciate your sharing these reports with the commissioners. The last items in the stack are copies of two letters from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund stating their position on the issue of grazing on Matagorda Island. As you can see from these documents, the law is clear regarding the responsibilities placed on me as a Refuge Manager, for denying activities on refuges that are not compatible. 133 1 In fact, I must be able to demonstrate clearly that an 2 activity is not harmful before I can permit it to 3 occur. I cannot demonstrate this on Matagorda Island 4 regarding the grazing because harm is clearly 5 occurring. The issue of compatibility is especially 6 important when considering the granting of special 7 economic priviledges to private individuals on public 8 lands, lands that belong to all citizens of the 9 nation. 10 "The decision I made to end the grazing on 11 Matagorda Island was not done arbitrarily nor was it a 12 personal attack on the Hawes family or their heritage. 13 Unfortunately it has appeared to have that effect on 14 them personally, and I sincerely regret that the 15 decision I had to make has had such an adverse impact 16 on them. However, I feel the decision is a sound one. 17 It is based on my own personal observations on what I 18 have read and studied on input from many others in the 19 wildlife profession, and on my 25+ years of experience 20 in managing or assisting in the management of some 50 21 National wildlife Refuges throughout the southwest and 22 Hawaii. You may not be aware of the fact that I have 23 a Master of Science degree in [wildlife Management, and 24 my Master's thesis was largely based on research I 25 conducted to determine the effects of three 14 134 15 • 1 intensities of grazing on migratory bird populations 2 on the prairies of Colorado. I have also attended 3 grazing workshops and Holistic Resource Management 4 shortcourse (Savory Grazing Method). I believe I am 5 well qualified to make the decisions regarding the 6 effects of the grazing program on Matagorda Island. 7 Some parts of my job are easier and more pleasant than 8 others. This certainly has not been one of the 9 pleasant aspects, not only from the prespective of the 10 controversy and extra work it has generated and the 11 personal attacks I have endured, but from the personal 12 feelings and regret I have about the trauma this has • 13 caused the Hawes family. However, I firmly believe 14 that I made the correct decision for the long-term 15 good of the island. I wish you were able to agree. 16 "I appreciate your committment to conduct the May 17 21, 1991, meeting in a manner that allows all parties 18 to present their information fairly. I am willing to 19 participate so long as that fairness is enforced. 20 Quite frankly, that has not always occurred in the 21 past when I appeared before the Court. It has made it 22 very difficult for me to present information so that 23 fully informed decisions can be made by our elected 24 representatives. We may not agree on some issues; we 25 obviously disagree on the issue of Matagorda Island • 35 2 3 4 5 6 7 n 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I 24 25 grazing. However, as a Calhoun County taxpayer as well as a government employee, it is much easier for me to understand and respect informed decisions than it is to understand or accept decisions that are made devoid of input or fact or based solely on emotion or political expediency. "It is unfortunate that the emotion that naturally surrounds the Hawes family as pioneering Calhoun County residents, has made it so difficult for people to see or understand the biology of the issue. Equally sad is the fact that this emotion has prevented many citizens and officials from looking beyond the grazing issue to see what we are trying to do to protect the island for the future and yet make it accessible for all of the generations to come. I hope that the May 21, 1991 meeting will be productive for all concerned." JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay, Would you for the purpose the court reporter would you identify that document? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: This is my letter to Judge Hartzog dated, I believe, May 16. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Could you mark this. 16 136 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Exhibit No. 1 marked for (identification. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: And I am going through all these documents and then it can be introduced that this is the package that you sent me and then I'll get their remark on it. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Would you identify these documents? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: This is the Compatibility Determination that I wrote. It was signed off on by myself and the Albuquerque Regional Office persons. I have to look up the date. It was the document that was transmitted with my March 2 letter to Mr. Hawes advising him that I was terminating his grazing activity. And it is dated March -- excuse me, February 28, 1990 and was signed off on by my Albuqueruqe Regional Office on March 1, 1990. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Exhibit No. 2 to be marked. (Exhibit No. 2 marked for (identification. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: There's a large body of 17 137 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 other documentation that I can provide to the court if you would like having to do with all the different layers of Mr. Hawes' appeal, his letters to us, our letters back to him that got us up to the next document that I believe you are ready to hand me which is the final decision. This next is the January 7 final decision by the Deputy Director of the Fish & Wildlife Service, Richard Smith. His notice to Mr. Hawes of the denial of the final denial of his appeal which terminated Mr. Hawes' appeals process in the administrative appeals process itself. That was the final. (Exhibit No. 3 marked for (identification. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The next item is my letter of May 14 to Mr. Hawes reminding him for -- I'm not sure exactly how many times -- but reminding him again of our offer of relocation assistance to help him with the cost of getting the cattle off the island. (Exhibit No. 4 marked for (identification. B3 138 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15' 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The next item is the Director of the Fish & Wildlife Service John Turner's testimony on March 21, 1991 before the subcommittee -- excuse me, before the Subcommittee on Fisheries & Wildlife Conservation and the Environment House Committee On Merchant Marine and Fisheries regarding secondary uses on Units of the National Wildlife Refuge System and there is a direct reference in this article to the Matagorda Island decision. (Exhibit No. 5 marked for (identification. COMMISSIONER MIKULA: What does that reference say to the Matagorda Island decision? You said there was a direct reference? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It is on Page 3 or 4, Mr. Mikula -- 3 or 4. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: When a refuge manager considers whether to permit a use on a refuge he should consider whether it is consistent with the Refuge System Administration Act. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Those are direct reference to Matagorda. I think they are quoting from the final decision. This next report is a GAO report 19 139 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 RCED-89-196 dated September of 1969 NaLional Wildlife Refuges Continuing Problems With Incompatible Uses Call for Bold Action. This is a Report to Congressional Requesters by the General Accounting Office. (Exhibit No. 6 marked for (identification. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The next -- let's see, I'm sorry. This is duplication of the other item, I believe. This is a duplication of the item just prior to the GAO report. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: So we don't need to enter it. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I don't believe so. I didn't realize I sent you two. That is where my good copy went I guess. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The next item is the US Fish & Wildlife response submitted by the Compatibility Task Group of the US Fish & wildlife Service dated June 19, 1990 to Congress. This is a report to the director which was subsequently submitted to Congress on a review of secondary uses occurring on National Wildlife Refuges in response to 140 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 congressional request for this information review. (Exhibit No. 7 marked for (identification. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The next item is a December 17 letter to Richard Smith from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc. in Denver, Colorado in support of the decision to terminate the cattle grazing on Matagorda Island due to its incompatibility with refuge purposes. (Exhibit No. 8 marked for (identification. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: And the next item is a December 18, 1990 letter from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc, to Secretary Lujan and Director John Turner -- did I say secretary -- I mean Secretary of the Interior Director John Turner of the Fish & wildlife Service. Notice of Violation of the Endangered Species Act and a 60 day notice of intent to suit if we don't follow through with the decision. 141 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Exhibit No. 9 marked for (identification. MR. BREI7T GIEZENTANNER: I might add there is a lot of information as you can see from the box that I brought in today that has been generated based on this issue. I did not attempt to give you everything. My copy machine is getting old and broken down. So I would be happy though to provide any other documents that the court might request and our files are open for anyone's inspection. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Mr. Giezentanner do you have anything else for this phase of discussion? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Not at this time. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: At this time I would like to recognize Dr. Sam Beasom with the Caesar Kleberg Welder Wildlife Refuge, Texas A&I University. So Dr. Beasom, as you know, we are here to discuss cattle grazing on Matagorda Island. Would you then give us your position as to cattle grazing, sir, and your qualifications? DR. SAM BEASOM: I'm director of the Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute and one of the missions of our research program is to develop grazing management strategies that are beneficial to wildlife 22 142 LJ • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 species. We have done a number of studies in this area over the past eight years. I have become interested in the Matagorda Island situation because of what I consider some problems with the biological determinations of grazing compatibility on Matagorda Island and that's a subject which I would like to address here this morning. And I would like to begin by emphasizing my appreciation to the difficult decision that the Fish & Wildlife Service has had to render in this regard and the -- I have to commend them for the processes that they carried out in evaluating public inputs and personally I do -- I still have some question as to the biological -- biological nature of the decision -- the ultimate decision that was rendered and I would like to address some of that here this morning principally relating to the grazing compatibility statement on Matagorda Island some of the objectives as outlined in the statement particularly Nos. 1, 2, 3. The first one is Goal and Objective Developed for Matagorda Island Refuge and Management Plan to protect and conserve the population and habitats of Matagorda Island's threatened and endangered species, especailly the whooping crane population; No. 2, to preserve the 143 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 natural ecosystem of a coastal barrier island community; and No. 3, is to encourage natural diversity of fish and wildlife speices within the refuge. I question the biology supporting these decisions principally with the compatibility of grazing and whooping Cranes. The determination was that grazing and whooping cranes are incompatible. This is based principally on a thesis by Howard Emory Hunt from Texas A & M University. It was done on the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. From a scientific standpoint I can point out a number of interpretational flaws within that particular study. I can make the determination from that same study that grazing would be beneficial to whooping cranes. Biologically those information -- that determination can be made from the same set of data from which was determined grazing and whooping cranes are incompatible. Secondly, it is questioned in the compatibility statement that grazing is not a natural component of the barrier island community. The coastal prairie grasslands are a part of the Great Plains grasslands which is described by Victor Shelford. The northern temperate grasslands -- the northern temperate 24 1 144 25 • 1 grasslands were evolved under the presence of grazing 2 pressure by large herbivores in particularly the bison 3 and pronghorn antelope. And Shelford indicates that 4 both of those animals had great impact on the 5 ecosystems. He indicates there were estimated numbers 6 of bison and pristene kinds was roughly 45 million. 7 Roughly similar numbers of pronghorn antelope. The 8 coastal prairie grasslands had bison and pronghorn 9 antelope. They were a part of the grasses that --. 10 they were part of the influenced factors under which 11 the grasses in the area evolved. 12 The grasses on Matagorda Island of course • 13 originated on the mainland which had the presence of 14 these large herbivores. The argument has been raised 15 that the bison were not present on the island 16 therefore their grazing is not a natural part of the 17 island. But the communities of grasses that are on 18 the island evolved on the mainland which did have the 19 bison. It is arguable whether or not the bison were 20 on the island but from the biological standpoint it 21 appears that it is immaterial whether bison were on 22 the island because the plants that were on the island 23 evolved where the bison had their influence. 24 It has been stated also that in prairie • 25 ecosystems that evolved under the influence of 145 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 grazing -- of large grazing herbivores that large grazing herbivores are a natural part of those communities. And too there's research that has shown that to eliminate grazing from a system of which it is a natural part should be considered a disturbance factor as much as grazing would be considered a disturbance factor where cattle or large herbviores never were. So it certainly can be argued that grazing is a part of the natural ecosystem that occurs on Matagorda Island. The third point in the compatability statement about encouraging natural diversity of fish and wildlife species; the literature has a lot of -- several references to the fact that grazing can impart a large degree of natural diversity into ecosystems. That point cannot be argued. One thing we need to try to clarify can be is an understanding of differential grazing pressures. Unfortunately, in most instances when grazing is referred to as a factor whether it be a disturbance factor or natural factor or whatever on landscapes generally it is referred to as grazing is an interpretation from situations that were where over grazing occurred. I'm not trying to make a biological argument that 26 146 27 • 1 livestock grazing or any kind of grazing whether it 2 even be from bison were never detrimental. Grazing is 3 a definite impactor to grassland systems. It has 4 differing impacts, however, according to the grazing 5 intensity that is imparted. Under natural systems 6 bison in their grazing activities would differentially 7 assert very heavy grazing pressure in instances where 8 the herds were. When they moved on those areas would 9 recover. Bison occurred in different size herds and 10 there was different amounts of grazing pressure that 11 were required by bison. This can relate to back to 12 grazing intensity. • 13 14 The intensity of grazing is the primary influence of the impact of grazing on grassland communities. 15 For example, if you had a sample grassland of 100 16 acres with -- in a natural system, for example, where 17 you had one bison grazing on 100 acres and compared 18 that to a system where there were 100 bison grazing on 19 100 acres quite obviously there would be tremendously 20 different impacts to the grassland and other 21 communities that occurred thereon. 22 And this is one of the primary areas that needs 23 to be clarified when grazing is talked about is to 24 reference different -- the levels of grazing that are 25 actually talked about. • 147 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 And this particular point raises considerable question with the grazing study that was done on the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge because there were by -- not"by design but by happenstance there were two different levels of grazing pressure in this study that was carried out on Aransas National wildlife Refuge and this resulted from -- there was three different pastures involved in the grazing study and there was two herds of cattle each of which had 150 animals. The three pastures differed in size. Two of them were the same size and one was considerably larger. So the stocking rates were 50 percent higher on one -- on the two smaller pastures, 50 percent lower on the larger pastures. Conclusions that are rendered from the study discounts the effects that occurred or didn't occur in the pasture that represented the lesser intensity of grazing. The conculsions that are drawn are drawn from the intensive levels of grazing. And even at that, the conclusions are certainly questionable. The data are highly variable and I strongly question that the conclusions that are rendered do not necessarily rely from total data sent as represented thereby. These are the main points of question from a biological standpoint that I would like to raise and O • • E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 as a scientist and biologist and a researcher I think there are certainly biological -- there's room for more biological interpretation of what has -- what grazing can do to this grassland system and to some of the endangered species that occur thereon and threatend species. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Dr. Beasom, you have sent to me a couple of information. One is a letter on the need to evaluate grazing compatibility on Matagorda Island. Would you like to read this letter for the court and have this entered into your records on this? (Exhibit No. 10 marked for (identification. DR. SAM BEASOM: "The Need to Evaluate Grazing Compatibility on Matagorda Island. "Present plans of the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service call for the elimination of grazing by cattle on the Matagorda Island because it may be detrimental to the general ecology of the island and to selected species of plants and animals. Although overgrazing may be detrimental, it is very likely that there is some lower level of grazing that is beneficial, or at 29 149 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 least not harmful. "After all, all of the vegetation on the island evolved under the infulence of grazing by large herbivores (bison), and it is a law of Nature that wild, living things are.at their healthiest state when they occur within that particular set of influencing factors under which they evolved. It can be argued that bison never occurred on the island, but that is a moot issue because the plants occupying the island originated on the mainland. "It has been argued that cattle are detrimental to whooping cranes and waterfowl and a grazing study on the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge is cited as supporting evidence. Unfortunately, however, this study -- is scientifically incomplete and inconclusive. The conclusions derived do not fully represent the data available. For example, the study apparently was inadvertently designed so that 2 different stocking rates of cattle were involved, one relatively light and one relatively heavy. (The heavy one twice the density of the light). The conclusions, which basically denigrate grazing are apparently drawn only from the more heavily grazed area. Even given this apparent oversight, the data only weakly support the conclusions. An evaluation of the data from the 30 150 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 31 more lightly grazed areas fail to substantiate the reported negative impacts of grazing. "Furthermore, to conclude that any livestock grazing is detrimental to whooping cranes and waterfowl is counter to common sense. Whooping cranes have expanded their distribution to include Matagorda Island and have increased their numbers thereon with the presence of grazing. Also, waterfowl abound in grazed areas on the island during the winter. More importantly, both whooping cranes and the kinds of waterfowl that winter on Matagorda Island are natural parts of the prairie grassland ecosystems. As such, they too had to evolve under the presence of grazing by large herbivores. If they were incompatible with. grazed systems one would expect they would not have successfully evolved. "It also has been argued that grazing is detrimental to the general well-being of Matagorda Island because the trampling and denudation of the foredunes will allow them to blow away, thus compromising the integrity of the island itself. While it can be argued that severe grazing pressure could result in dune destabilization, it is a fact that the past 100 - 150 years of grazing by cattle has not caused any apparent geological deterioration on 151 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the island. On the contrary, Matagorda is one of only two barrier islands that is actually increasing in size. As further emphasis, Hurricane Carla in 1961 was very destructive to Matagorda Island, carving away large sections of topsoil and vegetation and leaving extensive expanses of low, flat, bare sand. Subsequently, the foredunes and higher ground toward the center of the island re -developed and re -vegetated (while the island was being grazed). "In the absence of biological data with which to objectively determine the relative merits of grazing to the island and its total complex of flora and fauna, a comprehensive research program should be developed. Without research we would not have been able to determine that grazing is a critical habitat management tool for the endangered Attwater's Prairie Chicken. Similarly, there may be other species for which grazing is important. To act with responsible stewardship for all natural resources on the island would be to mandate that a thorough evaluation be conducted. If such an evaluation demonstrates that cattle grazing is incompatible with the island's geological integrity, vegetation, and wildlife then so be it, but at least there would be an objective basis for a decision on the matter. If the two are 32 • • • 152 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 33 compatible, however, it would be a win - win - situation for humans and the natural world." JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Thank you, Doctor. Would you look at this paper that you wrote July 12, 1990 and identify it for us, please, sir? DR. SAM BEASOM: This is a letter I wrote to Mr. Bill Hawthorne in Albuquerque with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service as my response to this biological interpretation and in response to the grazing compatibility statement that was developed for Matagorda Island. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Can we have that marked and entered? (Exhibit No. 11 marked for (identification. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Mr. Giezentanner, you have a copy of that? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I have a copy of that. It is also a part, I believe, of the final hearing record that was submitted in Mr. Hawes' final appeal on November 16 as is another document arguing the points in that letter. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Dr. Beasom, do you 153 34 1 have any other points that you want to make at this 2 time? Before-- what I want to do next is if you're 3 finished with the presentation I'm going to get Mr. 4 Joe Hawes to give us a history of cattle grazing on 5 the island and his interpretation of the present 6 cattle grazing situation. But before I do that I want 7 to see if you have got anymore -- before we get into 8 more of the discussion phase of this given that these 9 are some of the points that we want to discuss. 10 DR. SAM BEASOM: No. As long as we are going to 11 have further discussion later. 12 JUDGE IiOWARD HARTZOG: Yes. But basically I'm 13 trying to get the positions defined and outlined 14 first. So at this time I would like to call upon Joe 15 Hawes representing the Hawes family to discuss the 16 history of cattle grazing on Matagorda Island and what 17 the present situation with regard to cattle grazing is 18 on Matagorda Island. 19 MR. HAWES: First of all, I'm Joe Hawes. Great 20 grandson of one of the first pioneers in this area 21 Judge H. V1. Hawes that came down from Kentucky in 1839 22 and established a business on Matagorda Island. We 23 are supposed to stick mostly to the grazing. He 24 established grazing on Matagorda Island, of course, 25 and perservered through hurricanes and storms, being • • i 154 • r L_J r � U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 35 burned out in the Civil War, more Hurricanes had destroyed his home again. we survived all these hardships until the federal government saw fit to condemn our property November 8, 1940 for the stated military purpose. We were given ten days to remove all livestock and personal belongings from Matagorda Island. The Wynne interest who had purchased property on the other end of Matagorda Island in the mid-30's as soon as we had to remove all of our livestock when the property was condemned the Wynne interest grazed cattle entirely. including the Matagorda Island all during the World War II. All of us of age were practically in the service in World War II and at a hearing in Victoria February 6, 1941 General Gerald C. Brandt who was a spokesman for the government assured the people that when the land was no longer needed for military purposes they would get their land back. This -- mysteriously this document disappeared from the federal records. Even though we have depositions and affadavits from numerous people that were there at the hearing the document is gone from the federal files. There is still being searches for this document both in the Washington archives by Senator Gramm and 155 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 others trying to find these documents that are gone from the federal files. I have had a standing offer of $1000.00 to any clerk that can find these documents for some thirty something years. So far no success. We came back to Matagorda Island after World War II since we knew we was going to get our land back. They finally had a public hearing and agreed to lease us half of our former lands that were taken. The Wynne interest was given leases on the other half of our lands even though none of their lands were condemned and taken. They were given an over flight lease two years after our land was taken which gave them full use of their land all during the war and after. We were given this preferential grazing lease and it continued on up until the Air Force abandoned the base in 1975. Then the Interior Department was given the status of operating this lease. And it immediately went from five year leases to one year permits. And it was not constrictive at first but it became more so as the Interior gained control of this land. Texas in the negotiations over the Matagorda Island, Texas was the number one contender in that they were offered some 12,000 some acres of it and the Interior was going to take the rest. But Texas and Texans were sold down 36 � 156 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 37 the river by Governor Clements who was under the , Secretary of Defense that was instrumental in removing the Air Force. And one of the signers of the agreement that gave all of this to the Interior Department, Bob Armstrong, the Land Commissioner, who was a very good friend of the Wynnes especially Gordon Wynne, the legal arm of Mr. Toddie L. Wynne, who offered them -- offered to give them -- donate all of the state Permanent School Fund Lands around us this property even in the early 1970's. Mr. Andrew Sansom who is now head of Texas Parks & Wildlife who then was a special assistant to the Secretary of Interior who was instrumental in removing the Air Force from the island and who quoted Mr. Armstrong the Land Commissioner was offering to donate that land even then. And, of course, Mr. Perry Bass who is part owner of St. Joseph Island next to Matagorda Island also a personal friend of Governor Clements. These three names Governor Clements, Mr. Perry Bass, and Bob Armstrong are on the document that made this deal with the Interior Department that put some 25,000 acres of Texas Permanent School Fund Lands in the Refuge System including all of the public Gulf Beach and a 1,000 feet offshore up to the Wynne fence line. This new MOA calls for adding all the rest of 157 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the public Gulf Beach some 11 miles and a 1,000 feet offshore which makes over 26,000 acres of land that will be of Texas Permanent School Fund Lands that will be in the Refuge System tied up for 100 years. The people of Texas were given a bad deal any way you look at it. This is all of the Gulf Beach in Calhoun County and all of the Gulf Beach on Matagorda Island and all the bayshore marshlands. The marshlands where the whooping cranes do stay. They don't stay on the high land. They stay on the marshland. They are not on Matagorda Island they are on marshland, the Texas owned marshland. Texas has the power to hold all of the aces. But they were sold down the river and are being sold down the river. Now the Interior has strengthend its hand by eliminating Texas completely to where they have absolute control over the whole thing with Texas being given a subordinate role of entertaining the public and spending the money. And it is a disgrace, really to Texas that something like that could happen. The grazing end -- I'm going to get back to the grazing end. This is a decision of a refuge manager, his own decision by his own words and I want to give an example of managing the refuge which they brag about. They have had the 50 year celebration and they m 158 39 • 1 pat each other on the back about how good they are at 2 forseeing and managing wildlife. They have what they 3 call down there a narrative report that is filled out 4 by the refuge manager every year for the operation 5 that happened in that year. These figures are taken 6 directly from their narrative report that's every 7 year. This should be real interesting to a lot of 8 environmental organizations, wildlife organizations 9 and people that are really concerned about wildlife. 10 They have by their own records, and I want you to note 11 that the coyotes killed is separated. This is not 12 involved here. But by 1965, they have killed 357 red • 13 wolves killed on Aransas Refuge; 306 adults, 6 pups 14 and 45 unborn red wolves. Probably the biggest 15 concentration in the country of red wolves. •They have 16 killed 183 bobcats; 158 adults and 25 unborn. In 1965 17 report, the last red wolf killed then quote from their 18 book. "Rigidly protected red wolf and Bobcat." The 19 1972 report Page 10, quote, "There have been no 20 confirmed sightings of wolves for two years and a 21 dismal fact looms larger than ever the red wolf has 22 gone from Aransas." 23 I want you to stop and think about that. These 24 are the people that are there to protect something -- 25 keep something like that from happening. They are • 159 1 2 3 4 5 F*3 r7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 highly endangered and they claim there are none in the wild now. In 1986, Page 83, this is their own books on the Attwater Prairie Chicken Che 'i'atton Unit managed for the Prairie Chicken. "The Tatton Unit supported a peak population of 96 -- 96 chickens in 1977." Now they have been managed down to zero. This is management? The 1988, 1989 and 1990 reports are missing. They are not even there. The whooping cranes -- there are some of them disappeared their only job down here is to count them and keep track of them and some -- for some reason, some have disappeared they don't have any idea where they went. This is the same management that is saying that cattle on the upper Matagorda Island nowhere within five miles of the nearest whooping crane ever are incompatible with wildlife purposes. Also, in this narrative report of 1941 the refuge manager and an assistant.attend the U.S. Governments -- U.S. Condemnation Civil Action 55 hearing in Victoria with General Brandt was spokesman for the government told the Matagorda Island owners they would get their land back when no longer needed for military purposes the stated purposes for which taken. This hearing was in Victoria, Texas in M 160 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 February 6, 1941. According to the refuge records a report of the meeting was filed. Well, naturally I was interested in seeing the report of that meeting. So I asked Mr. Giezentanner about that. He says that it may have been lost in a 1961 hurricane at the refuge where they did lose some records or it may have been stored in Jim Clark's house on Matagorda Island that burned. Far fetched, if you ask me. Incidentally, the records of this court hearing disappeared from the federal records. Well, we know that. But what I'.m trying to imply is, you can be well educated and still use very poor judgment. And in my opinion eliminating cattle off Matagorda Island is poor judgment. Matagorda Island is in the shape it's in after being grazed continuously for some 151 years. It has not subsided. The Gulf beach has accrued. In fact, it is one of the few islands up and down the coast that has. And there's no plant or anything that's not on mainland. As far as the buffalo I don't always agree with anyone, of course, Mr. Giezentanner or maybe Dr. Beasom, but if it wasn't for the intracoastal canal I can wade on Matagorda Island right now and not be over this deep water. And they used to bring cattle off at 41 161 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the blackjacks and refuge. There's no reason why buffalo wouldn't walk across there just like deer and coyote and all do now and hogs. So there's no reason that anything wasn't on mainland was on Matagorda Island and really the question of whether it was or not really has nothing to do with livestock grazing on Matagorda Island. And to me it was a poor decision. It was aimed at severing the only ties the early families have left to Matagorda Island was to -- we're automatically a thorn in their side and this is eliminating our last hold to Matagorda Island and that's why it is not the money end of it, it is not the cattle end of it but it is a part history that is disappearing. They could care less about history I tell you that. My great-grandfather was born in 1798 and is buried over there. My father was born down by Panther Point in 1878. In other words, we have been tied to that island all this period of time and up until not too long ago, of course, I figured the taking was because of the Wynne interest associating maybe with President Roosevelt and all. And the Air Force higher ups seeing a place for a permanent playground for their hunting and fishing and so forth. Of course, now the fact that the refuge manager 42 • • • 162 43 • 1 and the assistants would go to a hearing in Victoria 2 that had nothing to do with them makes me think that 3 maybe even then there was some plans in the future for 4 acquisition of Matagorda Island. 5 In fact, in 1972, they were directed to declare 6 319 acres on.Salario Bayou which is on the upper end 7 of this island as excess. The Air Force says it is 8 not excess and they wouldn't do it. They were 9 directed directly by President Richard M. Nixon, "You 10 will declare it excess" so they had to. But we were 11 successful in going to Washington and stopping the • 12 acquisition of that. And like I said, in some 13 probably article in the papers we actually made them 14 so mad in Washington they started telling the truth. 15 That was the gateway to Matagorda Island where the 16 causeway would have to be built. That also would set 17 a precedence on the final acquisition of the rest of 18 Matagorda Island. That's the reason they wanted the 19 319 acres on Salario Bayou. Their quoted reason "for 20 the protection of the whooping crane" which of course 21 was 37 miles from there. But I just wanted to give a 22 little background to show that this is not a new -- 23 something that is not cattle grazing even. But 24 Calhoun County is going to suffer the brunt of this I • 25 guarantee you. 163 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Mr. Hawes, if I may stop you for the moment and just for the purposes of the record. How many cattle do you currently graze on Matagorda Island? MR. JOE HAWES: Approximately 525 head more or less. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: 525 head. Okay. Historically speaking how many cattle and how many acres have you been allowed to graze? MR. JOE HAWES: Well, before it was condemned, of course, we would run cattle up in the thousand because the land we didn't own we leased. And in one year when they put in this grazing program on that map it shows it very plain but in one year they forced us to move the cattle where they said move them. They stuffed them up in the corner where they couldn't even get to the gulf beach to get away t rom the insects. They stood there in the corner starved them to death. In one year they tripled their grazing fees and cut our cattle herd in half. In one year they run our grazing weights -- I mean our selling weights of calves 40 to 60 pounds off and our calf crop from 80 percent down to 30 percent in one year. Now that's financially disasterous and it don't make sense. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: What I need to know is, 44 164 0 N 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 9 10 11 12 13 • 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • okay, you say you have about 500 cattle on there now. How many acres are you allowed to graze this number of cattle in? I'm looking at the stocking rate I guess is what I'm asking. MR. JOE HAWES: Well, it is about -- they really they look at a map. They don't look at the ground. They think cattle can graze water, they can graze sand, but they can't. And out of that grazing area they call good all the way to Salario Bayou and really it's cut off by water. And it's not so. So we are actually grazing about 6400 acres. In other words, about 1/17 of the refuge. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Go on with the rest of your statement. I just wanted to get that in there. TAR. JOE HAWES: Well, I want to emphasize that Mr. Giezentanner is just a player in the game of sewing up Matagorda Island for the Refuge System. He is just one of them. He's the fall man probably but the decision even though he says the decision is his, it was not his. The whooping crane and cattle is a joke. Their incompatibility to cattle is a joke. Here not long ago Mr. Jimmy Rathcamp pulled his last cattle off the refuge and you might not even know it but three whooping cranes came with him to the Wollsey place and stayed with them over two weeks. 45 165 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 46 You probably didn't know that. And the Wollsey place is on the end of Hynes Bay and now has been purchased by Parks & Wildlife and also the Zarsky place adjoining that. The originally -- the 19,000 acres of the Guadalupe watershed was going to be -- trying to be acquired -- was marked.for acquisition by the Interior Department. But the high level of the Interior Department still with them said that Texas Parks & Wildlife said, "Let them buy it. They have plenty of money." So they are in the process of starting to acquire it. They acquired the Wollsey place, the Zarsky place and all the way up to between the bottom of the barge canal and Mission Bay to Highway 35 so far and still working on it they have plenty money, the Parks & Wildlife. And so they are procuring it instead of the Interior Department. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Do you have anything more that you want to add at this time before we get into discussion phase? There are some other entries that I would like to make before we get into the discussion phase? MR. JOE HAWES: The stated purpose and the only purpose that he can judge that the cattle were not compatible for the -- other than the purpose for which 166 C� • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 47 acquired that property we are talking about I will quote it exactly from his own thing: "Is to provide habitat for migratory birds, endangered species and other wildlife." That's it. Nothing about the ecology or gulf beach, sand or nothing else. That is it. Of course, the property wasn't acquired for that. It was acquired for military purpose in war time use. But when they -- the interior took control of that the process was absolutely illegal. So they had to get an act of Congress to ratify this agreement. It was not legal and by Congress ratifying it it says in effect even though this wasn't done correctly we agree to it anyhow which overpowers all other means. I left one important figure out of these things. One of them is our Land Commissioner, Garry Mauro. Garry Mauro says he's not against cattle grazing per se but he is going along with the Refuge of course. And he has no documentation whatsoever to support his theory of cattle grazing being harmful to wildlife. He had said he did. He had biologists report and he would send me copies, he never -- finally I confronted Spencer Reid. Spencer Reid said he doesn't have any copies. And of course we feel real strong that as land commissioner his willingness to put 26,000 acres and tie them up for 100 years the refuge says 167 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 including the public gulf beach and a thousand feet offshore should stir up any Texan. One more thing, if you look outside this very courthouse you will see the name of Colonel Edwin Hugh Hawes who died in combat. And it should be an absolute insult to anybody that has ever been in the service to think that while these people were in the service that their lands were being acquired for other purposes than as stated and with no intent of ever that land going back to them. On one end of them Matagorda Peninsula which was acquired under the identical Civil Action-55 was paid a lease and given their land back. And on the other end was the barbed wire fence owned by a millionaire, Toddie Lee Wynne, whose land was not taken. There's something wrong and there's something real wrong when a higher official refused to even look at it. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Thank you, Mr. Hawes. You made mention to two people. One, who is Andrew Sansom the Executive Director of Parks & Wildlife and the other is Garry Mauro the Texas Land Commissioner. I have statements -- letters from both them that I would like to read into the records at this time. This is a letter dated May 15, 1991 addressed to the Honorable Howard G. Hartzog. • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "Dear Judge Hartzog: As you are aware, we are currently operating Matagorda Island State Park and Wildlife Management Area under the Five Year Plan, 1989-1994 as approved by the Texas Parks & Wildlife Commission. This plan, as as well as the new Memorandum of Agreement currently pending approval by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service recommends removal of cattle grazing from the island. However, the option to resume grazing is included in both documents for future consideration. If I can provide additional information please let me know." And then he goes on to write me a personal note about that he's interested in putting road material on the island. I would also like to enter this into the record and to mention that in conversations with Andrew Sansom he indicated to me that he could not come out in favor of cattle grazing but he personally had no objection to that. So will you enter this and mark for identification. (Exhibit No. 12 marked for (identification. JUDGE. HOWARD HARTZOG: The next document I would like to read is a letter dated May 20, 1991 addressed to County Judge of Calhoun County from Garry Mauro, 49 169 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Texas Land Commissioner. "Dear Judge Hartzog: I'm pleased that you enjoyed the Coastal Management Seminar of Corpus Christi. "In response to your question about my position on grazing on Matagorda Island, I recognize that there are respected biologists on both sides of the issue of impacts and benefits of grazing on the wildlife refuge. I think that it would be useful to have the grazing impact studied in depth to evaluate the benefits and constraints of grazing as a management tool for barrier islands. "The island is still being operated under the agreement that was consummated in 1982. The consent of all the parties to the agreement is required to approve the particular management plan for the island. Although I am not opposed to grazing per se, I have concurred with the discontinuance of grazing on the island under the current five-year plan. "Grazing remains a management option in a future five-year plan submitted under the current agreement. Furthermore, we have maintained grazing as a management option in the proposed agreement that would bring the south end of the island into the cooperative agreement. If grazing is authorized under a future a 170 51 • 1 five-year plan, or under a plan authorized by the 2 proposed agreement, I feel the Hawes family should be 3 given the first right of refusal on the grazing. 4 "I would be happy to discuss this with you if you 5 have any concerns with my position on the grazing 6 issue. Sincerely, Garry Mauro Texas Land 7 Commissioner." Please mark for identification. 8 9 (Exhibit No. 13 marked for 10 (identification. 11 12 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: I would also like to enter • 13 into this something which is already in the 14 Commissioners Court records but for the purpose of 15 this hearing to enter into the record the Resolution 16 On Matagorda Island with regard to the Comprehensive 17 Management Plan - Memorandum of Agreement which also 18 speaks of grazing. 19 "WHEREAS, the United States Department of 20 Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, State of Texas 21 General Land Office and Parks & Wildlife Service, are 22 proposing a Comprehensive Management Plan - Memorandum 23 of Agreement for the management of Matagorda Island, 24 and 25 "WHEREAS, in the proposed Comprehensive • 171 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Management Plan - Memorandum of Agreement and Co -Operative Agreement between the Fish & Wildlife Service and the Nature Conservancy, dated May 1990, Pages 9 & 10, state, 'no causeway, highway, bridge, ferry, public airport, or similar mode of transportation providing motorized vehicle or aircraft access to the island will be permitted, except for administrative and management purposes for authorized personnel' "WHEREAS, Matagorda Island presently is inaccessible to the general public other than by conventional water borne transportation, and "WHEREAS, the Calhoun County Commissioners Court desires to see that all its citizens through improved accessibility to the northeast end of Matagorda Island have the opportunity to enjoy the recreational and historical aspects of Matagorda Island, and "WHEREAS, because of this inaccessibility to Matagorda island and other than by conventional water borne transportation, the Calhoun County Commissioners Court does hereby call upon the United States Department of Interior (Fish & Wildlife Service), and the State of Texas (Texas Parks & Wildlife Service and General Land Office), as owners of Matagorda Island for the citizens of the.United States of America, to 52 172 53 • to Matagorda 1 significantly improve the accessibility 2 Island so the general public will have the opportunity 3 to enjoy the recreational and historical aspects of 4 Matagorda Island and 5 "WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Management 6 Plan does not adequately address the question of 7 improved accessibility for the general public to 8 Matagorda Island, and 9 "WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Management 10 Plan totally eliminates cattle grazing, as a range 11 management tool from all of Matagorda Island, and 12 "WHEREAS, the Nature Conservancy is not a • 13 governmental entity and therefore should not a party 14 to the Comprehensive Management Plan Co -Operative 15 Agreement and therefore, tenancy at the Wynne Lodge on 16 Matagorda Island should be terminated. 17 "NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the 18 Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, does 19 hereby request the following from the United States of 20 America and the State of Texas to: 21 "(1) Allow Calhoun County, Texas, through its 22 governing court, the Commissioners Court 23 administrative action, as per Disclaimer and 24 Reservation of Civil Action No. 70-V-14 styled United • 25 States of America, Plaintiff vs. 17,499.11 acres of 173 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 land, more or less, situated in Calhoun County, Texas and the State of Texas, et al, Defendants, to set aside a National Historical Shrine to be constituted. by the acreage on Matagorda Island some two miles northeast of the Matagorda Air Force Base, fronting on the Gulf of Mexico and the Pass Cavallo, with a connecting causeway and highway easements to Port O'Connor, Texas. In accordance therewith, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, does hereby respectfully request that the reservation of administrative action be granted. . "(2) Delete prohibition clauses on vehicular access to Matagorda Island as found on Pages 9 & 10 of the Comprehensive Management Plan and the Co -Operative Agreement. Calhoun County, Texas is interested in the entire Matagorda Island; however, the area of the island of most interest for improved accessibility would be the abandoned Matagorda Air Force base and the properties northeast thereof. Vehicular accessibility on that portion of Matagorda Island would be restricted to certain types of vehicles and to the highway easements and designated parking areas. This area represents approximately six miles of Matagorda Island which is 38 miles in length. Also, this area is not a critical habitat area. 54 174 • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "(3) Authorize an independent biological and ecological study to determine the effects, if any, of cattle grazing as a range management tool, and until such time as a study is completed, the present grazing lease be continued in effect. "(4) Avoid using fire as a range management tool until the independent cattle grazing study is completed. According to the wording in the Comprehensive Management Plan, the basic objective of Matagorda Island as a wildlife refuge area is to support the National Migratory Bird program and to enforce the Endangered Species Act. Using fire as a range management tool would endanger, disturb, and threaten the lives, of the Texas Horned Toad Lizard and the milksnake, among other endangered species, and therefore, the U.S. Wildlife Service would be in violation of the Endangered Species Act. "(5) Provide for assurance to the general public that hunting and fishing will not be restricted or eliminated, other than by enforcement of the standard game and fish regulations, within the area defined on Matagorda Island Map #5 as the Whooping Crane Critical Habitat, specifically the bays and estuary area included therein. "(6) Include Calhoun County, Texas as a party to 55 175 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 any agreement involving the surface land management of any part of Matagorda Island because of the heretofore mentioned request for administrative action as per - Item #1 of this Resolution and that the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, must ratify any proposed agreement prior to subject agreement being in effect. "(7) To set aside the implementation of the proposed Comprehensive Management Plan or any future plan, including the discontinuation of cattle grazing until such time as these issues or resolved with the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, and furthermore, until such time as proper investigation hearings, if any, of Matagorda Island issue for condemnation of the land for military purposes until the present time, are completed. "(8) Respectfully request that United States Congressman Greg Laughlin, State Senator Kenneth Armbrister, and State Representative Steve Holzheauser, vigorouslyoppose the proposed Comprehensive Management Plan in the present form unless the requests of the Calhoun County Commissioners Court, as outlined in this Resolution, are approved by Federal and State authorities, and the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas. 56 V6 E • is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 57 "This resolution is to be presented to the public hearing, June 20, 1990, by the Calhoun County Judge as being the position of Calhoun County, Texas. Certified copies of this Resolution are being .sent to the following:. The Honorable George Bush. The Honorable William Clements. The Honorable Manuel Lujan, Jr. The Honorable Phil Gramm. The Honorable Lloyd Bentsen. The Honorable Greg Laughlin. The Honorable Garry Mauro. The Honorable Charles D. Travis. The Honorable Kenneth Armbrister. The Honorable Steve Holzheauser. The Honorable Curtis Tunnell. The Honorable George Fred Rhodes. Constance Harriman, Assistant Secretary United States Fish a Wildlife Service. The Honorable H. Tati Santiesteban, State Senator The Honorable Robert Saunders, State Representative. Mr. Arnold Oliver. "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas supports 177 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the above resolution: "PASSED AND APPROVED by the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas on June 15, 1990 and signed - by all commissioners. I would like to enter this into the record." (Exhibit No. 14 marked for (identification. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: We have also had a request from Mr. Preston Stofer as a director and a member of the Land Use and Environment Committee of the Texas and Southwestern Cattlemen's Association and a member of the Private Lands and Environmental Management Committee of the National Cattlemen's Association. "Dear Judge Hartzog: I would like to attend the hearing concerning grazing on Matagorda Island but I have a previous commitment and will not be able to do SO. However, being a Director and member of the Land Use and the Environment Committee of the Texas and Southwestern,Cattleman's Association and a member of the Private Lands and Environmental Management Committee of the National cattlemen's association, I am very interested in this issue. "Would you please enter the enclosed article k 178 • 1 2 3 4 5 • • 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Grazing Saves Endangered orchid into the proceedings on May 21, 1991." And I have here a copy of Grazing Saves Endangered Orchid. This comes from the National Cattlemen's Magazine Environment Issue.and I'll go ahead and read this: Grazing Saves Endangered Orchid by Kay Ann Ishmael. "Although cattle grazing is being attacked by . activists in the name of preserving the environment, grazing actually has improved the environment for the Ute Ladies Tresses, a threatened orchid located on property owned by the Boulder, Colorado Open Space Program. "The Orchid, dating from the Pleistocene epoch 2.5 million to 3 million years ago, is found in only three locations in the world -- small patches in Utah, Nevada and Colorado. Colorado's population is the largest consisting of several thousand plants located on 650 acres owned by Boulder Open Space and leased to Hogan Brothers Ranches. The Iiogan brothers graze and hay the area where the orchid lives. "When the orchid, Spiranthes diluvialis, was discovered in 1984, people wanted us to get the cows out,' says Maria Ryan, agricultural research assistant for the Open Space Program. 'We took the cows out for 59 179 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 one year, reimbursed the Hogans and didn't lease the land. We went back to count a year later, and there were only about 560 plants there. We got the cows back and went back to haying.' "Several thousand Ute Ladies Tresses are now located in the pasture, and research is being conducted on the population by leading researchers and botanists because other existing populations are too small and too fragile to work with. '"We know nothing about the life cycle, genetics or habitat requirements -of the plant,' Ryan says, 'except that it lived, thrived and propagated with traditional agricultural practices." I think the point of this being by Preston Stofer is that there are some benefits derived from cattle grazing. Please mark this in the record. (Exhibit No. 15 marked for (identification. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Again at this time We go into open discussion. I would like to ask if the commissioners of this Commissioners Court would like to make any statements. Commissioner Hahn, you indicated that you would like to make a statement. m • • 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: Yes, sir. I would like to address -- I understand that we are talking about taking the grazing away and using controlled burning instead of grazing on Matagorda Island. Now the Horned Toad is an endangered species. And in 1934 I was 10 years old and we moved from Blackman in Calhoun County to Westhoff and the farm we moved on had a lot of horney toads on it. So being curious, the 10 year old curious kid -- why I played with the horney toad and the only defense they had if you aggravated them was to get up on all fours, raise their head up, open their mouth and hiss at you. And if you got them mad enough they would even try to spit at you. And that was their only defense to being aggravated or scared. So that spring I had planted some corn, helped daddy plant some corn and so I was fooling around and I was supposed to go rolling. We had an old wooden roller with an old mule in front of it. I was in a hurry because I was late so I trotted down to the turning roads sandy land and I ran over one of the horney toads. So I stopped the mule and got out and went over there and he was kind of halfway covered up with sand and he jumped up and I reached down to get him and he jumped up and hissed at me and took off. 61 181 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 W M So that fall, when the corn was through planting -- harvesting the corn. The wives too -- while we burnt the cornfield it had grass on it and corn stalks. And the reason this sticks out in my mind from way back there was that after it burnt off there was a flash fire and here -- and it burnt from the south to the north and here this little horney toad was standing up on all four legs with his head up, his mouth open and the flash fire had killed him. He was still standing there. That was his only defense to fire. So I'm saying that if you use burning, there's a lot of the horney toads on Matagorda Island. And Judge, you, Stanley -- Commissioner Mikula and our late commissioner Mr. Royce Smith and myself were on a tour of Matagorda Island. And on the paved road there were a lot of horney toads that we drove down. And sooner or later whenever you drive down that road with Mr. Giezentanner who drives down probably every so often, one of the horney toads is going to zig when he should have zagged and he's going to get runned over. And he's not going to -- when that vehicle drives over him on that paved road he's not going to get up and hiss at you and run off. He's going to be dead. And whoever sets fire to burning off the island 182 • C J �J 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 63 which is normally -- at the time when we were over there they had an accumulation of about four years of mountain grazing and they were planning on burning it off. And it is quite a bit of debris whenever you have grass that's over 6 or 7 foot tall and it falls down and nothing grazes it. Accumulated over four years that's going to be a hot fire. And whenever he burns that thing off with all of those horney toads in there he's not going to be standing up on all fours he's going to be burned up because that's going to be a hot fire. Now answer me. Whenever somebody drives over one of those horney toads and kills them or somebody burns him up, the person that sets fire to that thing is just as guilty or is driving that vehicle is just as guilty of destroying an endangered species as the man to occasions that men have taken a shotgun and killed a whooping crane. Now are we going to take Mr. Giezentanner if he's the one or whoever is driving that automobile, are we going to take him in front of a federal judge and are we going to find him guilty of killing an endangered species? Or whoever gives the order to strike that match to burn off that grass and he kills some horney toads are we going to get him arrested and take him to 183 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 federal court and her. I think he is just -- they are just as guilty as the man who took the shotgun and shot the crane. And therefore, I think that grazing is much more compatible to endangered species like the horney toad than fire. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Thank you, sir. Commissioner Smith? COMMISSIONER SMITH: Nothing. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Commissioner Mikula? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Yes. Judge, I have a few comments I would like to make. I would like to read some information that -- from some biologists concerning the Comprehensive Management Plan for the Island. This is a memo that was directed to Dwight Williford who is head of the Park Master Planning. It was from Don B. Frels who is a a Regional Director of Wildlife Region IV and Dennis Brown who is the Area Manager Biologist. And I will not read the entire report just merely a portion of the transmittal memo. And it points out that they had just received the Comprehension Management Plan on Friday night March 9. The memo is dated March 11 and they were asked to give their opinion of it and they did not have adequate time. They also point out that Wildlife Biologist, David Mabie, who had conducted significant 64 • C_J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 65 research on Matagorda Island, was not available as well as Wildlife Biologist C.D. Stutzenbaker, who is a wetlands wildlife specialist. However, those people did agree with what I'm going to read to you and that is that we disagree with minimal tool management. Which is -- minimal tool management would be using fire as a range management tool since it is highly likely this concept will adversely affect the majority of wildlife species utilizing the upland flats. we also disagree with the reduction and manner of hunter and fisherman opportunity while recommending the spending of large sums of money attract non -consumptive users. And then Bobby Alexander on March 14, 1990 he added a postscript which indicated he was in concurrence. And one of the things pointed out in this is what Commissioner Hahn mentioned about the Texas horned toad lizard which is on the threatened species list for the State of Texas. The Category II on the endangered species. Isn't that right? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's correct. They are not on the endangered species list as a threatened or endangered species on the Federal list. But it is a Category II. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But you do have to 185 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 recognize the Texas -- MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: And then this is a memo that was directed to Bobby Alexander from Don Frels, Dennis Brown, David Mabie, Charles Stutzenbaker and this is dated December 3, 1989. And I will read this. "It is our understanding that the decision to remove livestock grazing as a wildlife management tool for Matagorda Island was determined at the Executive level as the most politically expedient alternative at this time. Under the circumstances this is understandable and we want to assure that you this will receive support from the field staff. However, we are dismayed by numerous ecological, biological and philosophical comments expressed in Mr. Clark's memo which is attached. Also, similar statements by various individuals associated with the Sierra and Audubon Clubs and with the Department must be challenged." And then later in the memo it mentions, "Our comments pertaining to Mr. Clark's memorandum are based on our accumulative experience as wildlife biologists at Matagorda Island for 47 years and on the Texas coastal prairie for 79 years. Mr. Clark's M. IN 11 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 experience level at Matagorda Island approaches approximately two years." Now these memos, I believe, were -- these biologists' evaluation of the compatibility of grazing and the management plan in general I think were probably after you had already made your decision to remove the cattle from the island. And then also I don't know if any of you saw this but in the April 19-21 the Houston Post U.S.A Weekend, the headline is "Garth Day Roundup. Are Cowboys Killing the West?" And the article is titled "Are Cowboys Killing The West?" by Jim Robbins. And I will just read a brief portion'of that: "Local and national environmental groups say that cattle have annihilated these wide-open spaces and that grazing has done more damage than any other activity. The whole show has been subsidized by U.S. taxpayers to the tune of $150 million each year. The anti -ranching battle cry is: 'Cattle -Free by 193' And the subject of the article is Catron County, New Mexico and then it also touches on an area in Arizona where the Federal Government is eliminating cattle grazing from Federal property as a range management tool." And apparently the trend is nationwide. It is 67 187 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 0" 21 22 23 24 25 M. not based on any sound biological reasoning, it is strictly politically motivated and the slogan is: "Cattle Free by '93." I called Catron County and received copies of ordinances.that their Commissioners Court had passed concerning this issue as well as some other information. And in this packet is "When Your Public Lands Aren't Public Anymore. Who Loses?" And it is an organization that's entitled "People for the West!" out of Pueblo, Colorado. And so the point is that apparently the trend nationwide is to remove cattle as a range management tool from all of your Federal property. And speaking of Matagorda Island apparently the trend is there as well. Also, I would like to read this is an Action Alert from the Sierra Club dated July 24, 1990. I will not read the entire alert. This one particular paragraph the subject is a proposed new Management Plan for Matagorda Island. "The Sierra Club has been working for nearly ten years to remove the cattle from the island. The decision has already been made to remove the cattle in September unless Congressman Laughlin succeeds in his efforts to alter this decision." So, Mr. Giezentanner, you refer to the Sierra • • • 1 071 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1W Club on defense on numerous occasions in your presentation and then in reading this and in what's happening out west and particularly Matagorda Island although you have the credentials to sign the report I think it is pretty obvious that your decision was influenced by the Sierra Club and not by the biological and ecological data and that the decision to remove the cattle was in fact made years ago. Probably prior to you being reassigned as the manager of the Aransas National wildlife Refuge. And then this pertains to the south end of the island and it deviates a little bit from the grazing issue but on the south end of the island where the Wynne Lodge is located that property was purchased by the Federal Government in 1986 by the Texas Nature Conservancy and Andrew Sansom who is now the State Parks & Wildlife Director -- Texas Parks & Wildlife Director was an employee of the Texas Nature Conservancy at that time and not only helped orchestrate that but also wrote the -- authored the report in 1972 or 1975 when he was at that time -- and Mr. Hawes referred to that -- an assistant to the Secretary of Interior. And, of course, now Sansom is with the Parks & Wildlife Department. But the Nature Conservancy purchased the land, UO 1 2 3 4 5 C 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 sold it to the Federal Government, retained a tenancy role and for $1,000.00 per person you can go spend the weekend at the Wynne Lodge. And that's the area where if you see any whooping cranes at all you will probably see them in that area. But if you have $1,000.00 you can use the island. But cattle grazing is incompatible. And then let me just r--ad according to Mr. Giezentanner's findings. Let me just read this one article that was in the Victoria Advocate. Actually, it was a letter to the editor Sunday morning February 1.0, 1991, "Grazing Cattle and Wildlife." And this letter was from Wesley T. Vivion from Victoria. "Editor, The Advocate: The Matagorda Island situation gives me cause for concern. I cannot understand why cattle grazing and wildlife are not compatible. I have been around this area for a long time; I have experienced first-hand the mutual benefit of both: I worked at the Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation from 1957-79. 11(1) I worked with Dr. Clarence Cottom, who was the.number one biologist of the nation. He managed the wildlife program while I looked after the cattle. I never once heard him say that livestock was harmful to wildlife. There were plenty of both on that property. The only thing that hurt the wildlife were 70 :190 • r� U 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 71 the wild hogs. They tore up the turkey and quail nests. Eventually the hogs were trapped and moved. 11(2) I was a frequent visitor to the Aransas Wildlife Refuge beginning in 1940. I observed the combination grazing with wildlife protective measures: the burning of the salt grass was done so the cattle would have better winter feed. Burning was done late in the fall so that ground -nesting birds were not disturbed. The spring burning was done around the middle of February on high grounds before the birds started nesting. Both sage grass and live oak brush were kept under control. "(3) I have observed the combination of livestock and wildlife on Powder Horn Ranch in Calhoun County since 1938 and also on the La Salle Ranch near Port O'Connor. Wildlife has flourished in both areas. I worked the property adjacent to the La Salle Ranch for 45 years. We had an abundance of wildlife together with the cattle. "(4) Recently my friend Bill Bauer of LaWard, a well known rancher and pioneer of this area gave me a book entitled "Fire Ecology" by Wright & Bailey. The text supports my conclusion. 11(5) I can remember when the federal government appointed four men to appraise the land on Matagorda 191 1 F 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Island before taking it for military purposes: Grover Boyd, rancher; W.D. Stevens, rancher; T. A. McDonald, farmer and rancher and Joe Moore, banker. They were sent to appraise the land with the understanding that the Hawes families and others would get their property back after the war ended. This of course did not happen. It is said that wise men change their minds many times; the fool never. Ah, that we had more wisdom in this our day. Signed, Wesley T. Vivion." And there has been -- I don't know whether Congressman Laughlin as of this date has introduced legislation ratifying the proposed Memorandum of Agreement.but in that legislation there is a call for a four-year study on the grazing issue. And Mr. Giezentanner, I would like to ask you if you would continue to graze while a study -- a four-year study is being done to determine the compatibility of grazing on Matagorda Island? There has never been a study done -- a comprehensive study done to my knowledge. I have this information here and of course you have some information that you assimilated but there has never been a true scientific study done on the grazing issue of Matagorda Island. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Are you asking me for an answer now? 72 "192 • r L J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 H3 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Give him the answer now. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I'm really directing it to you. But whatever the Judge wants you to answer. I would like for you to answer the question. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Before we get into this I think there is one last piece that Commissioner Hahn mentioned that we had -- what the court had made an inspection of Matagorda Island previous to my taking office and also I'd like to enter this letter from Ronny Gallagher and Luke Thompson relating to a visit to Matagorda Island by Dr. Sam Beasom and myself. (Exhibit Nos. 16 through 23 (marked for identification. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: This a letter from Parks & Wildlife Department to Calhoun County Judge. This letter is.in response to your recent request for transportation to and on Matagorda Island for yourself and Sam Beasom. "We would be delighted to take you to the island on Tuesday, April 16 at 8:00 a.m. weather permitting. It is our understanding that you would like to return to the island before 4:00 p.m. 73 193 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "Because you are visiting the island to view the cattle operations, which are the responsibility of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, we asked them to provide the transportation on the island. Brent Giezentanner and his new island manager Chris Pease have agreed to meet you and Mr. Beasom at our docks at 9:00 a.m. "If we can be of any further assistance please let us know. We look forward to seeing you on the 16th. Signed Ronny Gallagher, Superintendent and Luke Thompson, Planner." The reason I ask this to be entered is to establish that on that date mentioned in the letter Luke Thompson and -- excuse me, right -- Luke Thompson and Brent Giezentanner, Ron Gallagher and Jennifer Sanchez, Dr. Sam Beasom, Mr. Joe Hawes and myself toured the island from north to south and made observations on the island at that date. I think that probably concludes the early presenting of items unless anyone else has another item of the Commissioners to present and then we can go into the discussion phase where then questions that either Dr. Beasom, Mr. Giezentanner, Mr. Hawes or the Commissioners have raised that can then be answered. After this phase.is somewhat completed or 74 194 • r U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 75 exhausted then again we will entertain questions from anyone in the audience. Then we will direct them to whoever. So at this point if y'all will speak one at a time so that we can get an accurate record for the court reporter. Brent, since you started first do you have anything you would like to put forth? Questions that you would like to ask or statements -- additional statements you would like to make? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I would like to make several statements in clarification of some other things that have come up. And first I would like to answer Mr. Mikula's question about would I allow.a study? The law under the present regime essentially prohibits me from allowing this study at the present time. I have made a determination that grazing is incompatible with purposes for which that refuge was established. I firmly believe that I have made the correct biological decision based on evidence at hand. Now, of course, if Congress acts to allow a study I will allow a study because that is the law of the land. But right now the law of the land, the Refuge Administration Act of 1966 pretty well prohibits me from allowing grazing to continue on the island. I 195 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 M. don't know if that is -- I hope I have made that clear. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: You say public -- public law you cited a public law that -- MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The Refuge Administration Act of 1966. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: That prohibits you from continuing grazing on the island? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: If I believe it is as a Refuge manager that it's incompatible with the purposes for which the area is established. I would like to get into a few other comments in just a minute regarding the study issue itself. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: well, I didn't ask you to authorize a study. I asked you whether you would continue the grazing while a study was being done. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It's not that I would disallow a study from occuring. It's that I cannot allow grazing to continue under the Refuge Administration Act of 1966 because I have determined that it is incompatible with the purposes for which that refuge was acquired. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Okay. But it's you stating that. Not the law. ,196 • • Cl 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The law tells me what I can and cannot do. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But the law does not say that cattle grazing cannot be continued. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. The law is not that specific. It says as a refuge manager I can only allow those things to occur on a refuge that are not deemed harmful to the refuge. And I believe that's substantiated in the testimony that the director presented before Congress. It's -- the record of evidence is clear in the GAO report and the record is clear in the law itself. Now if Congress chooses to tell me that in this particular case I don't have to go by that law. They are bending the rules for a particular case of course then I have the option. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Could you -- while this legislation is going through the legislative process could you agree to continue the grazing? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: There's no provision in the law that allows me to continue something for a little while if it may be harmful. It says you do; you make the decision yes or no. You do allow it or you don't allow it based on what your determination as a professional in the Fish & Wildlife Services. And 77 1V I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 that's what they pay me to do, Mr. Mikula, COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: What are you going to do if the State of Texas, the General Land Office and Parks & Wildlife which state that they wish to see that that property is grazed? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Since the majority of the grazing occurs on federal land I would assume they could issue a permit to graze the state lands and we would have to fence it off and keep the cows off the federal land. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Would you -- can I ask another question? Would you continue -- if the General Land Office and Parks & Wildlife stated that they did not oppose the continuation of grazing on Matagorda Island would you continue to graze it? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Not under the current law. I cannot do that. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: What puzzles me is the law doesn't tell you that grazing is not permitted. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: You need to read the law, Mr. Mikula. The law does not get into very specific instances for -- COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I have read the law. I understand. m • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: We're managing on National Wildlife Refuge of 450 refuges around the country. They cannot write a law that will come up with every particular proposed use for every refuge. They give the refuge managers considerable discretion to make professional judgments and evaluations based on their training and their knowledge. And that's what we are being paid to do. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, in that case then the administrative appeal process that was included in Mr. Hawes' grazing permit was basically a sham? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. That's not correct. It was reviewed by several layers of other professional biologists. And I think that's an important point to point out here in this discussion is that it's not just the decision of one man. I made the initial decision but this was reviewed by several layers of the government all the way up to the director of the Fish & Wildlife Service. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: It seems to me, Mr. Giezentanner, that the decision was made by more than just you. The decision was also made by the Sierra Club apparently some years ago. Now I know that all of the Sierra Club members do not share your thinking 79 199 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 because I have heard from some. But on the executive level of the Sierra Club the decision was made years ago to terminate cattle grazing on Matagorda Island. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I take strong issue with that statement, Mr. Mikula, because the Sierra Club did not make my decision. They happened to agree with my decision but they did not in any way make my decision and I felt no pressure from them, the Audubon Society, the Defenders of Wildlife, nor any other group. As a professional wildlife manager I made the decision independently.. Now it is correct that a large number of the environmental groups agree with the decision I made. But I felt no pressure from them at all in this regard and they did not make the decision for me. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: You rather frequently refer to the Sierra Club Defense Fund in your presentation. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. I did. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: So apparently their thinking was parallel with yours and probably even had some influence on it. But let's -- can I continue, Judge? JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Yes. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: On the fire as the m 200 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 range management tool in the Endangered Species Act and not the purpose for which the land was acquired but what ultimately you are using it for and that is being wildlife refuge, the Texas horn toad lizard being on the threatened list -- the state threatened list which puts it a Category II on the Endangered Species Act, the Federal Government Act. Isn't that right? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: What are you going to do to protect the Texas horned toad lizard to not violate your own Endangered Species Act? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, for one thing all of our Management Programs or Management Plans will have to undergo what we call a Section 7 review. And this is a review that's conducted by other biologists not on my staff to determine all of the impacts good and bad, beneficial and harmful of any proposed action on the refuge. We have an office down in Corpus Christi. The Ecological Services Field office which has an independent set of biologists that review all federal actions on the National Wildlife Refuge that we conduct. And they make determinations. They make decisions based on what we propose to do. Sometimes M 201 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 we can't do what we want to do because they tell us it will impact adversely on endangered species. Sometimes they are able to tell us ways that we can modify a program where it will not be harmful to the endangered species that occur. But all of our programs have to undergo this Section-7 review. COPMMISSIONER MIKULA: But if you harass or endanger or threaten a threatened or endangered species aren't you violating the Endangered Species Act? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's probably true. Yes. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: So isn't one of the purposes of the island that to protect the endangered species? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: And then you are going to use fire as a range management tool and violate your own acts? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. We are not going to violate the act. Your causeway to the island would bring many vehicles over there that would flatten the horned toad. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: We are not talking about a causeway. We are talking about cattle grazing M. 202 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 on the island. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, your resolution does discuss a causeway in great detail. So that's why I brought it back in the record. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Okay. So your testimony is that possibly you would be and most probably you would be violating your Endangered Species Act? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's not my testimony. You are paraphrasing me incorrectly. I said that we will not adversely impact on endangered species on the federal list of Endangered and Threatened Species. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: And you are going to totally neglect the Texas Threatened list? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. I did not say that. They are also a concern. The Category II species are also of a concern. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: The Comprehensive Management Plan and analysis of it indicates that you would adversely affect the Texas -- MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's your interpretation. That is not our interpretation. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: It's in black and white. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's not our W 2J3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 interpretation. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Okay. Have you ever heard of "Cattle -Free by' 93"? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. I have heard of that. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: What does that mean? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It's a movement on public lands primarily Bureau of Land Management to enforce service lands primarily in the west to try to remove cattle because of some conflicts that many people see between the ecosystems and some of those habitats and the livestock industry. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: What Bureau of Land Management -- what Federal Department does that come under? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's under the Department of the Interior Forest Services. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: The Fish & Wildlife? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Fish & Wildlife Services is under the Department of Interior. We are under different directors. The Forest Service is under the Department of Agriculture. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But both of them m 204 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • m are under the Department of Interior? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. And they have entirely different -- at establishing authorities and entirely different purposes for existing. The Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service are multiple use agencies. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Refuge Division is not a multiple use agency. We are set up and set aside for a very specific totally defined set of purposes and goals by the acts that establish the Refuge System. And the difference between the Fish & Wildlife Service and these other agencies is that you don't make compatibility determinations in the Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management. There are many different kinds of public uses of those lands that have to co -exist some at the expense of others. On refuges the big difference is that wildlife will always take precedent over all other uses on those lands that are National Wildlife Refuges. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Is Texas horned toad lizard that's wildlife, isn't it? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. It is very definitely one. And that's one of the conflicts that we have found on Matagorda Island in that many times in the past wildlife has been very narrowly defined on 2k5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1U. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the island to mean quail, deer and doves. While we are trying to take a look at it is a management scheme that will benefit over 400 different species of wildlife. There's some 320 species of birds that occur at some time or another on Matagorda Island. Most of these have been neglected in past Management Programs especially by the Air Force and maximize their management activities to benefit quail, deer and dove. Those three species at the expense of many other things. Now I have said a number of times in the past and I will say it again. Now I have used cattle myself as a tool in other places as a means of managing wildlife. It depends on what your objectives are for the particular area. If your objectives are to maximize quail, deer and dove populations they are a very valuable tool in many locations. Our objectives on Matagorda Island are not for quail, deer and doves. The only species of those three that is a migratory bird is the dove. The quail and the deer population are resident wildlife species. The narrowly defined purposes of Matagorda Island is for migratory birds and endangered species. I keep hearing the milksnake come up in discussions. I'm not even aware if milksnakes even occur on Matagorda Island. I don't m • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 �J • 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 m believe they have been reported on the island. The Texas horned toad lizard definitely does occur over there. It's a very good population of those. And they do get squashed by vehicles driving down the road. It's entirely possible that one may get caught up in a fire. It's also entirely possible that one may get stomped to death by a cow. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: so you're managing Matagorda Island as a Wildlife Refuge for the whooping crane? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. If you go back and reread the Compatibility Determination that I gave you about a year ago you will see very clearly in that that the whooping crane is a very minor part of the whole Compatibility Determination. It is mentioned in one or two paragraphs or a couple of pages in there out the sixteen pages of that documentation. It is one of the minor features. I never said that the cows and the whooping cranes are in direct conflict on Matagorda Island. But I would present this to you; the cows and the whooping cranes don't occur in the same place. Why not? We don't know. Because we have never had a chance to look and see whether they go there without the cows. I don't know if they would or not. We 207 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 don't know. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Do you allow cattle grazing on the Aransas Wildlife Refuge as a range management tool? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: We did for the purposes of doing a study that Dr. Beasom referred to and I would like to go into some continents about that in just a little bit. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But that's all the cattle grazing you have done? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: There was grazing on the main part of Aransas up until the early 19701s. The brush problem -- the brush encroachment on Aransas was increasing dramatically and it was largely due to the fact that that refuge had been over grazed for about 100 years by too many cattle year round. And that's why we have the brush on Aransas. I use cattle as a tool on the Tatton Addition over near the highway 35 for attwater prairie chicken management. At the present time we do not have cattle on that area because we had a severe drought as you all know for five years and we had a severe brush encroachment on that area. Once I get the brush under control and we get normal rainfall patterns back I likely will be putting cattle back on the Tatton m 208 • • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Addition to manage that habitat for endangered species for the attwater prairie chicken. As a matter of fact, I've even.asked Dr. Beasom to help participate in designing a grazing program for that when that time comes. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But once cattle are removed from Matagorda Island that will be the end of cattle grazing on Matagorda Island? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: If we are successful in doing with our fire program when we intend to do, to enhance migratory birds and endangered species populations, yes, in all likelihood it will be the end of cattle grazing on Matagorda Island. But we have also left open the recognition that maybe we can't do it the way we propose to do it. And if not, we will back up and look at all tools. But as a manager I don't want to be forced to use one tool over another. I don't want to have to select because of political pressures, local pressures or economic pressures or anything else one tool over another. I want to be able to select the most economical tool that I can use to achieve the benefits for the wildlife populations on the island. And right now. I think fire is probably that tool. I may be wrong. Time will prove whether I'm right or wrong on this issue but I don't [� 209 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24' 25 think it is fair to the taxpayers of this nation to use a tool that costs $10.00 an acre like brush control or $20.00-$30.00 an acre when I have a tool that I can can use for 20 cents an acre. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, I don't feel that the Commissioners.Court is reacting to political pressure. We would just like to see some sound biological and ecological reasoning for discontinuation of grazing. I consider political pressure to be what the Sierra Club has done. What you have cited as well as what they have distributed in their actual work. Judge, if we could, I would like to see what area on this map that Mr. Hawes' cattle grazes and then the area where the whooping cranes are. Can we do that? JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Certainly. Mr. Hawes, would you point that out and describe in such a way that the court reporter can have some north and south reference points to where you are talking about or known reference points. MR. JOE HAWES: Well, right now the cattle are allowed to graze only on this blue area (indicating) which is in two pastures. This is a fence all the way across from the bay to the gulf. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Now this is the south end 210 r � L J • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 W. 19 20 21 22 23 24 ng here (indicating). MR. JOE HAWES: This is the Wynne addition -- the $13 million 600,000.00 party place -- where the public is not allowed where Nature Conservancy still operates. This is a little over 11,000 acres. This is the 28 miles that was condemned and taken from these families. This is the entire Matagorda Island Refuge (indicating). This is the refuge, the Aransas Refuge and the cattle only are allowed to graze on this little area right here (indicating). They call this part of the grazing area but this has all been cut off with water and is not grazable. It is sand and water. And this is what we call a lighthouse interpretive barrier some 2300 acres -- a little bit less than 2300 acres that the cattle cannot graze and it has been burned. We have seen the effects of burning there. It burned the whole thing at one time. It burned sand hills plumb to the gulf beach and all that saved it from being a desert there now is we had a tremendous rain right behind it. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. Where are the whooping cranes? MR. JOE HAWES: The whooping cranes they are down in this area (indicating). Well most of them are down 01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in this area. An area of Cottonwood. We call it Austin Bayou but they call it Cottonwood Bayou in this area here (indicating) and on down on St. Joe. And they come up here to Panther Point and sometimes as far as here. They very seldom do they come any further than Cedar Lake. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Do they cattle graze St. Joseph Island? MR. JOE HAWES: They cattle graze St. Joseph Island. Mr. Perry Bass has steers over there. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Are there whooping cranes in that area? MR. JOE HAWES: Yes. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: And who owns that land? MR. JOE IiAWES: Mr. Perry Bass is one of the owners. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Commissioner Mikula, also for purposes could you point out the area described by the disclaimer reservation to the court? The historic area? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: It would be this area that I think would be referred to as probably No. 5. This area right in here (indicating). Is that right, Brent? Mr. Hawes? It may not go that far. MR. JOE HAWES: It bypasses right there. And the 92 212 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Civil War trenches are right here (indicating). COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: And then here is the Matagorda Air Force Base. It goes to the Matagorda Air Force Base. MR. JOE HAWES: It goes -- COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, right in here (indicating). It goes two miles northeast. JUDGE IIOWARD HARTZOG: Commissioner Icahn, now that is part of your precinct, is it not? COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: Yes. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. So that's an area that you are very familiar with. Dr. Beasom, would you speak to your observations on Matagorda Island with regard to the April 16 tour that we took and what your findings were based on that tour of Matagorda Island where we went basically from the Air Force Base -- old Air Force Base landing site all the way to the Wynne Ranch and then back to the north end? DR. SAM BEASOM: Well, all I can -- JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: And if you would, Dr. Beasom, speak a little bit louder so some of the people in the back can hear. I am a little bit deaf myself and I'm having trouble. DR. SAM BEASOM: All I can relate to would be 93 213 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 casual observations of course. But we did make a pass all the way from through the grazed areas down to the what is now ungrazed areas and back. And we looked at areas where the cattle had just been moved from recently into an area where they were moved to. And we looked at -- the road goes kind of north and south through that area and it was quite obvious that you could see different impacts in the vegetation down the island. What was the most intriguing thing to me that I visited about it briefly was in the area that the cattle were moved -- just had been moved into there was a tremendous difference in the vegetation. The general nature of vegetation that you could see and it was based on different distribution of cattle and intensity of cattle grazing within that pasture. Apparently a few of the animals had moved down to the lower end of the pasture and most of them were staying up to the upper end more northerly end of the pasture. And.to me that.indicated what you might expect at different rates of grazing. What those rates were I don't know but there were more cattle in one area than on the other area. And you could see an obvious difference in the vegetation. That's just casual observation but it was fairly obvious I think. 94 214 FR • 1 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: You mentioned rates of 2 grazing. Do we have any information relative to what 3 sort of management plan the Fish & Wildlife has as to 4 the rates of grazing that they were using to deal with 5 the cattle population that was on the island? Was 6 there a systematic or is there a systematic way in 7 which you determine how many cattle to put in any one 8 area or was this done in a non-systematic method? 9 DR. SAM BEASOM: I can't give you too much 10 history on what happened before I got there. 11 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Basically as you have been 12 there. 13 DR. SA14 BEASOM: The rates were set in • Service 14 consultation between the Fish & Wildlife and 15 the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department. We have had a 16 very awkward situation in the past in that the 17 day-to-day operations of the cattle operation on the 18 island were supervised by the Parks & Wildlife 19 Department but the permit was issued by the Fish & 20 Wildlife Service and this was locked into the way the 21 old agreement which is still currently in effect was 22 set up. And I couldn't go into much detail as to how 23 those rates were derived because I wasn't party to 24 those discussions and the individual that was died; he 25 was my predecessor. 215 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 W 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 W. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: So with regard to stocking rates we don't have any data to determine whether an ' area was overstocked, understocked, properly managed or not properly managed but Fish & Wildlife and Parks & Wildlife were responsible for setting the management rate -- and I'm not using -- the grazing -- MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I'm sure the economics to Mr. Hawes played a large part in that decision. Though he might argue that he didn't get what he wanted out of the decision I'm sure that had some influence into how many cattle were allowed to occur. One thing that is going on over there, Mr. Hawes like he said, has 520 some odd cows in animal unit mud a cow/calf combination is an animal unit mullet. He has ' 500 and some odd -- 520 approximately. His authorization is for 583 animal unit meds in addition to those particular units and I don't know how many of that 523 is actually cow/calf combinations. He also has a large number -- he has the calves which don't count as a separate number and there are also some -- I understand there are quite a few heifers that are not being counted against his allotment because they haven't produced a calf yet. The normal procedure in the Fish & Wildlife Service is to charge a fee for any animal that is six months of '216 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 97 age or 600 pounds. For some reason and I don't know what the permit had been issued for many years without that provision in Mr. Hawes' permit. I was going to initiate that at that time that I made the decision that we are not going to continue the permit so we have not been charging him for a quite a number of animals that are not breeding animals but not yet counted against his rate. And I have no idea of knowing how many animals that is but I know he has many animals over there that would be counted and essentially they are eating almost as much as a cow/calf combination would. But they're not counting against him. I would like to make one other comment here at this time because it seems to be appropriate. We are talking grazing AUM's and the like. I think it should be stated for the record that while we have in effect tripled Mr. Hawes' grazing fee were talking about going from $.80 an AUM to $2.50 an AUM. Fair market value in the local area is anywhere between $7.00 and $10.00 an AUM. So the taxpayers are picking up the rest of the cost. Now that's just the way this has been set up. Also at the time we assumed the grazing activity from the Air Force my understanding is that we owed Mr. Hawes money for him grazing the land over 217 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 there. He was able to deduct the cost of the expenses for his fences and windmills and planting the coastal_ bermuda that I think you have even done some of the planting on over there from the cost of operating his activity over there. So when we took over the activity he had a credit in the account for grazing the land. And I think it needs to be made clear that the taxpayers in this particular situation are picking up part of the tab just as they would for any study that may get done if Congressman Laughlin is successful in his bill in promoting a study. Dr. Beasom's group has submitted a study proposal to us for $583,000.00 to do a five-year study on the grazing on the island. Part of that is Kleberg Institute money, part of that is taxpayer's money to determine whether I made the right decision or not. I maintain I made the right decision and we can save the taxpayers half a million dollars. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Mr. Giezentanner, so it's then your understanding that there has been no scientific basis for stocking rates or no scientific management formula? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I didn't say that. I don't know what the discussions were that occurred. FM 218 1 I'm sure it was based on some logic but I don't know • 2 what that logic was. 3 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: But even after you took 4 charge? 5 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: We continued to issue 6 the permit the way it had been issued in previous 7 years. 8 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: But no attempt had been 9 made to manage the grasslands from the standpoint of 10 what is the most ecological and beneficial to all of 11 the -- both the cattle and the grass. But, Dr. 12 Beasom, help me if I'm using the right term here. But 13 it seems that in order to make some sort of decision • 14 that cattle grazing is bad you first have to determine 15 what you're actually doing in terms of stocking rates 16 because if you have a thousand cattle on one acre they 17 are obviously not going to last or if you have, you 18 know, one cow in a thousand acres that is not cost 19 beneficial to the program. 20 Commissioner Hahn, would you like to comment on 21 that? 22 COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: Not only that but you 23 have to take into consideration the rainfall in the 24 area and all of these and the type of soil and 25 everything has to be taken in not just the cow ratio 219 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 E 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 100 per acre. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, this points out one of the difficulties in using livestock as a tool on Matagorda Island. The very things that you point out, Commissioner Hahn, there is very little flexibility in what you can do on Matagorda Island and still maintain an economic viability for a rancher on the island. It is not a situation where you can just move the cows out and down the road to another pasture or something like that. It is -- the cattle have to be barged on and off the island. It's a difficult place as we all know to get to. Their rainfall plays a large role in it. Last year the island habitats were very dry due to the drought. If I had had the flexibility to say, "I want your cows off of the island until we don't have a drought anymore" then that would have been good for the land. But I did not have that flexibility. I inherited a program -- the grazing program which was locked in for five years due to the Five -Year Management Plan. That five-year plan expired in 1989. Subsequent to that the permit expired and that was the first opportunity that as a refuge manager I had had to take a look at it. Is this really compatible with the purposes for which we established 220 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 this area? Because it was a foregone conclusion up until that time that we were going to have livestock grazing because of the five-year plan and the way it was written. And the first opportunity I had as a refuge manager to make that analysis was on the termination of the five-year plan and that's why the timing occurred theway it did. Up until that time for two previous years I had issued the permit to Mr. Hawes because I did not have the flexibility to say no because the five-year plan had been signed off on by all of the agency people. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Commissioner Mikula? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Mr. Giezentanner, under the -- well, the five-year plan, the original five-year plan provided for grazing as a range management tool. And doesn't the proposed five-year plan also provide for grazing as a range management tool as well as fire as a range management tool? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The current five-year plan that we are operating under starting last year for the next five years said that cattle grazing will be suspended for five years. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Does it explicitly say cattle will be suspended? 101 221 102 1 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. It does. Or the 2 letters documenting theapproval process up to that 3 point it says I approve the plan subject to the 4 suspension of cattle grazing for five years and I 5 believe that's in the letter that Garry Mauro wrote to 6 you and it is also in letters from the Fish & Wildlife 7 Service to the State Parks & Wildlife Department. The 8 initial proposal -- 9 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But you could -- 10 but under the original proposal you could have 11 discontinued cattle grazing. Isn't that right? 12 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Which original proposal 13 are you talking about? 14 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: The original 15 five-year proposal. You are not under a five-year 16 grazing permit, were you, Mr. Hawes? 17 MR. JOE HAWES: It was included in that. As a 18 refuge manager he can terminate grazing at any time he 19 wanted to. 20 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: So you could have 21 terminated it,then, couldn't you? 22 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's not entirely 23 correct. It would have been very difficult under the 24 existing five-year plan because the old five-year plan 25 says grazing will be continued. 222 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 103 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But we are operating under the existing plan which means that grazing is an option. You wouldn't re-evaluate your position and continue cattle grazing while the legislative process is taking place on this bill? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Mr. Mikula, I have evaluated and re-evaluated and re-evaluated my position on this. I don't like being subjected to this kind of scrutiny and criticism and I have agonized over this and I firmly believe based on a bunch, a whole lot of re-evaluations that I am correct. And every time I go over there and I see what the cattle are doing to the island I am even more convinced. COMMISSONER MIKULA: Why don't you include for supporting evidence all of this information that you are basing your decision on? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I have included that in the Compatibility Determination and the documentation in our files and I open those to anyone for scrutiny at this time. But the stack is about this high (indicating) and I don't believe everybody in this room has got that much time to go through it all today. You are welcome to come out to the refuge and look through there. I welcome anyone to look through 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 104 our files because I have nothing to hide. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Dr. Beasom, did you see anything on the island in your trip and I believe that was not your first trip to Matagorda Island that would indicate that the island had somehow deteriorated due to cattle grazing? DR. SAM BEASOM: I couldn't make that assessment based on what I saw that other day that trip was made. Like I said awhile ago, what really stuck out in my mind is that different concentrations of cattle are going to have a different impact on the island. And we don't hear that in terms of this analysis. All we hear about is grazing is bad. I haven't heard anything yet about different levels of grazing. And I firmly -- I affirm that if a manager is in charge with the managing and there's a problem with the numbers of cattle something in the system I would try to change it. And in this particular case with the federal government it may be very difficult to do. I don't know. But to assign what is happening at a given time with a given number of livestock as bad forever without any indication of what the impacts might be at different levels is difficult for me to understand. And I wonder too about how in the compatibility 224, • L J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 105 assessment how grazing is considered detrimental. Perhaps we can talk about issues one at a time. I don't know if that would be appropriate or not. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Go right ahead, sir. DR. SAM BEASOM: One of the statements that was mentioned is about the nutrient loss. Is this correct? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Uh-huh. DR. SAM BEASOM: That by using livestock nutrients are being taken off the island. And when you sell the calves or whatever when you sell the products that are raised on that island you remove the nutrients and you have a continued nutrient loss through time. This at face value you can't argue with but you have to look at the services record too in terms of grazing. Grazing is considered a necessary tool for managing attwater prairie chickens. And why net loss of nutrients is considered bad in one condition and not bad in another condition is also questionable. If nutrient loss is that bad of a problem one would expect that it is a problem on all lands that are managed for grazing by the service. And I've wondered about that. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, I would answer 225 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ME that by saying that there are some things that you do that would be bad for the land but reaches an objective that you are trying to do for a wildlife species. And the particular case you are referring to on attwater prairie chickens maybe you're willing to live with a little loss of nutrient value on the land itself which you might be able to replace by other means in order to benefit the chicken. But I don't seethe cattle on the island are benefiting any endangered species. That -- why allow them to diminish the nutrient level on the island if they are not benefiting anything that you are trying to manage for. It's difficult. The other thing I would like to say too is we can discuss these points. I would like everyone to keep in mind that it's a cumulative effect of a whole lot of these points that brought me to the decision I made. It's not nutrient levels on the island or effects on horned toads or effects on whooping cranes or effects on the sand dunes or effects on the reduced invertebrate faunas in the ponds or on the grasslands themselves or a change in the plant community. It's not any one of those items or any one moment in time that affected my decision. It's the 226 107 • 1 cumulative affect of all of these different things 2 year round. And if you have to manage a wildlife 3 population -- I believe you will agree with me on 4 this -- you have to manage a wildlife population in 5 your ecosystems based on a concern for the weak links 6 in the system. And if you take out something like the 7 invertebrate fauna in the grasslands that are so vital 8 to the thousands of migratory birds that make first 9 landfall at Matagorda Island and there is nothing 10 there for them to eat then you have wiped out that 11 component of your ecosystem. • 12 If you take out the -- you affect the health and 13 viability of your dunes because of trampling and 14 trailing through the dunes you've taken out that weak 15 link. Any one of these things may be of greater or 16 lesser importance at any moment in time. But it's a 17 cumulative affect.that you have to consider. 18 So there's a danger in picking these single 19 things out and discussing them without keeping in mind 20 that it is a cumulative affect of all of these things 21 that work together to make an ecosystem on the island. 22 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: So you are basically 23 saying that somehow the island is broke and we are • 24 going to fix it. Even though for the past 150 years 25 we have had cattle grazing to some extent on the 227 W.? 1 island, we have had some active to the island. Are we 2 saying we need to resurrect the bison onto the island 3 because it was a natural component of the island in 4 pre -historic or whatever you want to call it terms? I 5 mean, what basis of time are we looking at? If 6 something is not working, if something is incorrect 7 then we work towards fixing it. But if something has 8 shown over time that it seems to be working why do we 9 need to fix it if it is not broken? 10 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, I think what I 11 hear you saying is we have to fix it but we have only 12 got one tool we can use to fix it with and that's a 13 modification of the grazing system. I don't hear you I 14 say what would it be like if we hadn't had cows for a 15 150 years? Nobody ]mows. 16 It's the same parallel argument of why aren't the 17 whooping cranes up in the grazing area? We know that 18 the cranes are expanding northward on the island but 19 they are not going nearly as rapidly as the population 20 is expanding. Why not? lie don't know. I'm not 21 saying it is because of the cocas. I'm not saying it's 22 not because of the cows. The same argument holds 23 true. 24 Why limit me to using only one tool, cattle 25 grazing and a modification of that program in some I 228 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 • 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 • 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 W01 fashion. I would say that would be very difficult to do because of the economics to the rancher. Mr. Hawes I think knows that better than anyone how hard it is to make a buck off Matagorda Island in the grazing over there. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, we are not talking about grazing the entire island. So why not continue the grazing? You have that option under the original five-year plan. And do a study of the grazing versus the non -grazing. You're not grazing the entire island. That has not been done. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: A study can be done but it doesn't have to be done on Matagorda Island. In Garry Mauro's letter he says that he firmly supports the idea of a study. He very carefully did not say it has to be done on Matagorda Island. It can be done on San Jose which is in many respects very similar to Matagorda Island. It could be done on Matagorda Peninsula. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: But the question we are here to debate is the question of cattle grazing on Matagorda Island. Cattle grazing which has been successfully conducted for recorded history of 150 years and know we are going to change this? We have decided that something is broken and we are going to 229 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 110 fix it? You indicated that you say that something is wrong with Matagorda Island. And yet I have not seen any demonstrable proof that anything is wrong with Matagorda Island. Dr. Beasom has related to the fact that perhaps on Matagorda Island there may be different stocking rates for different areas and also given different types of climatic conditions but that still is a management decision and not because Matagorda Island is broken or in some manner not the way it is supposed to be or the way it has been for a long time. We cannot go back to the days of the dinosaur. We cannot go back to the days of the bison. So we have to deal with the ecologies pretty much the way they are given that there is no demonstrable evidence that this ecology or this occurrence is detrimental to the ecology. And we've not shown that there is anything bad happening we are just showing it has been going on for 150 years. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I disagree with you when you say we are not showing that there is anything bad happening. What we are dealing with right here is the same thing we would be dealing with five years down the road if we did a study. 230. • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ill And Dr. Beasom alluded to a study that was done by Howard Hunt on the Aransas Refuge. That study was not designed by the refuge. That study was designed by Texas A a M by Dr. Doug Slack the former President of the Wildlife Society here in Texas. It was a very professionally done study. And what this points out to me is when other professionals in the profession like Dr. Beasom take issue with some of the findings in that study it points out to me where we would be five years down the road and a half a million dollars poorer if we did another study. Because there are still people who are not going to believe the data in the study because it doesn't say what they wanted it to say. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But there are a lot more people that disagree with that. So why not take the opportunity and take the gamble on doing the study and continue grazing? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: You raised a letter here in the editor a little bit ago from a Vivon who quoted Dr. Clarence Cottam. Turn to the back page of my Compatibility Determination and you will find out one of the main references I used was Dr. Clarence Cottam from the Welder Wildlife Foundation who took it on a personal and professional crusade to get the cows off 231. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 112 of the Padre Island seashore because of some of the very same conflicts that I'm dealing with here on Matagorda Island. So it's interesting that your letter quotes the same guy I did. It said Cottam says that they weren't bad. It depends on where you're talking about and what your objectives are. I never said cattle are bad. I don't hate cattle. I eat beef. I like a hamburger and a steak like anybody else. I'm not a vegetarian. But I don't believe in this particular case on Matagorda Island that they are appropriate. I'm talking about not grazing seven -thousandths of one -percent of the land of the State of Texas. Unfortunately that affects Mr. Hawes very deeply because that's his seven -thousandths of one -percent. But that's all I'm talking about here. But some of the opposition that has come at me on this thing make me believe that they feel like livestock grazing in the whole State of Texas is under attack by me and that's not correct. I have never tried to take this decision off the island and apply it anywhere else; just on the island. COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: I would like to ask Mr. Hawes a question. Isn't it a fact that before they told you where to put your cows that you had cows in 232 L 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 1413 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • 113 I all areas and they stayed in that area in small batches and they did not venture from one side of the island to the other necessarily? And now since they have tried to manage your grazing they have concentrated larger amounts in smaller areas? MR. JOE IIAWES: That is correct. Cattle -- they were native cattle and they were acclimated and they stayed in the same area because they were not restricted by fences and so forth. I don't like fences. COMMISSIONER OSCAR IiAHN: Now I would like to ask Mr. Giezentanner a question. When you have a concentration of cattle in one area and they go to the sand dunes at night to get away from the mosquitoes and the flies and what have you, they will deteriorate the sand dunes much more than if they were the small group here and a small group over there? They would not destroy the vegetation on the sand dunes like the incident that you showed us while we were there and that was caused from a high concentration of cattle in one area which y'all, the Parks and and wildlife, told him he had to do. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I believe as you may recall as we drove up the island where we entered the grazed area and we stopped at the fence line and we 233 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 114 looked at the difference in the two and we drove northward through the grazed area you saw a gradual increase through that entire area in the width of the beach and the decrease in the height of the dune. Now that was expanded over a large broad area in that grazing area. Dr. Beasom could probably discuss better than I could what the differences in light intensity grazing and heavy intensity grazing are in the way the cattle themselves select individual plants. COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: But that is not what I had reference to. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, in a sense it is. COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: I was talking about going up on the sand dune and destroying the sand dune when there is a large concentration on a small area where if there's a small amount over the whole island the same amount of cattle over the whole sand dune would not show any MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, certainly I'm not going to argue against the fact that if 500 cows go through an area they are going to do more damage than if five cows go through there but down the way another five cows go through. I wouldn't argue that at all. But there are some other things that have to do 234. 115 • 1 with the way livestock graze. Livestocking rates, for 2 instance, may not be the most beneficial thing on many 3 lands because those animals are going out and 4 selecting individual plants not just species but 5 individual plants and cropping those plants over and 6 over again because they have the ability to do that 7 and there's not a lot of competition for what they are 8 eating. 9 Heavy stocking rates for short duration may be 10 what you are looking for where they go through and 11 take out everything but they are only there for a 12 short period of time. Your deferral period may be 13 your most important thing in using a livestock on an • 14 area. 15 But the point I was trying to make earlier is 16 that there is not a lot of flexibility. The inherent 17 nature of Mr. Hawes' cows the way they do stack up on 18 the fences and I pointed this out to you fellows when 19 we were over there. The way they do stack up on the 20 fences is one of the problems with using Mr. Hawes' 21 cows as a tool on that island. The way they do 22 concentrate. 23 MR. JOE HAWES: I agree to the stacking up part. 24 The grazing program that we were forced to implement 25 we had nothing to do with it. It is a very stupid 235 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 116 plan. On that bigger area they made us keep the cattle five months. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER:. Would you clarify "they" for me, please? MR. JOE HAWES: It's the Texas Parks & Wildlife because they were the managers but the Fish & wildlife Service Refuge System agreed with them or it couldn't be done. And they made us keep those cattle in the first place on that upper end three months -- 90 days and five months on the other part. Now in that period of time when the cattle finally acclimated we're not talking about little mainland pastures -- similar pastures -- we are talking about a long strip of land. And by the time them cattle finally get scattered to where they are grazing that area you have to move them there which puts them against that fence. And by the time these finally have eaten their period of time, go to the new range on up there, well, they have to move them the other way which makes about three -fourths of your grazing on one-fourth of the land. It puts them against the fence trying to go back to where they come from. It is a stupid arrangement. We are not talking about mainland. Mainland is entirely different. Nothing like Matagorda Island. The idea of dense 236 117 • 1 concentration on cattle on the island don't make 2 sense. You'll trample dunes and everything else. 3 By the way, cattle don't go over sand dunes, they 4 go around them. Just like a person, you're not going 5 over sund dunes you're going to walk around them. But 6 to get into the beaches is very essential and the gulf 7 beach it would be impractical the fence is in a little 8 pasture which it should be if you're going to really 9 do rotational grazing. What they call rotational 10 grazing is alternate grazing because there are only 11 two pastures involved. But to put it in small 12 pastures you have to run a fence from the gulf to the • 13 bay which is absolutely impractical. It is almost 14 impossible to keep any fence up on that gulf. 15 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I agree. 16 MR. JOE HAWES: And it doesn't make sense. In 17 other words, as it was there was no adverse effect on 18 that as long as the Air Force had it and we didn't 19 have these controlled pushing cattle in a certain area 20 for a certain time. We have never been furnished a 21 copy of the grazing program. We don't know what it 22 was. Their simple statement was you move the cattle 23 where we say when we saw. We had no say in it 24 whatsoever as to the stocking rates either. We had no • 25 say. None at all. It was just dictated to us. 237 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 118 COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: That cow is used to going down here to graze on this end and you put a fence in there and you tell them they have to be up here, they're going to naturally crowd that fence because they're trying to go back where they were raised. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I understand that. That keeps reinforcing the point that I was trying to make though is that there are some inherent problems with trying to graze Matagorda Island the way you might need to graze it for wildlife management purposes. And Dr. Beasom and I have had some discussions of some -- some brief discussions about this very thing. And the fact that economics to the livestock operator then become one of the driving forces and when economics to the livestock operator is driving the system I don't have flexibility to use that as a tool and it is not a tool for wildlife management when I have no control over that because the way the island is configured, the way the fact that the cattle need to go to the beach every night, the way you can't maintain a whole lot of cross fences in that harsh salt environment. It takes all of those flexibilities away. And for me as a manager and essentially you end 238 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 is 25 119 up grazing the island the way the rancher wants to instead of the way that you need to do it for wildlife. And I think Mr. Hawes made this point clear. He would like no fences on the island. And that would be great for his operation. I don't think that would give me any control over the habitat changes that we would be trying to achieve by using livestock. So if I have no control over those objectives and what we are trying to achieve then it is not a tool to me. It's simply an economic endeavor on public land at that point. And that's been one of the big problems with this. I have used livestock in the past on very fast rotation -- deferred rotation systems and your key in that is the deferral period. That's your key to success in that operation. And I don't see that we can but something like that on the island because it is just economically not feasible and it would cost the government a tremendous amount of money to buy the materials for all of the fencing and it would cost Joe Hawes an awful lot of money and time and effort to install those fences and maintain them if we were to put in some type of a multipasture rotational system. Also the cost involved are somewhat limiting in 239 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 120 trying to run a steer operation, for instance, because everything has to be barged on and off of the island. And right now his current operation is to take the calves off and take them to market and go over and check them and work his cattle but there's very little brought on to the island. You never introduced a cow to the island, you use your own stockers. MR. JOE HAWES: No. You did say we brought an infected heifer over there which we never did. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Somehow an infected heifer got on the island. That's all I know. MR. JOE HAWES: Somewhere that heifer got invented. And you're the one that made the statement. We never took a heifer to the island. Period. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: All I know is there was brucellosis on the island. MR. JOE IiAWES: Wynne had brucellosis. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, we wouldn't have had that disease on the island if we didn't have domestic livestock. COMMISSIONER OSCAR HAHN: Mr. Hawes, none of your cattle had brucellosis? MR. JOE HAWES: We tested way back twenty some years ago when we first started testing. We tested clean. After twenty-two years because Wynne had 1.240 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 121 brucellosis we were forced to test. And the first tests at that time we had 603 head that was tested and there was two reactors showed up. They took them up to the auction and re -tested and only one was a reactor they claimed. I don't think that one was. Then they come in with a new program. They called it a -- they were experimenting with and they come up with some very inaccurate readings and we were finally tested and cleaned up and we were certified free. So we didn't bring brucellosis to the island. If it was there it was on the Wynne end. That's why Wynne sold all of their cattle slaughtered, hanging weights to L & H Packing Company out of San Antonio. They didn't sell them alive, they slaughtered them all. They couldn't pass up that $13 million offer for that land. And nothing come up about grazing being bad for the island until Mr. Wynne sold out. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Our court reporter needs to take a ten minute break. Her arms are probably wearing out. I apologize and probably everybody else needs to take a ten minute break and then we will come up and return at noon. Okay. (Short break taken.) 241 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 122 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Taking note of the fact ' that it is 12:00 and not knowing exactly how much more discussion that we have got. Commissioner Hahn has -- given me a couple more items that I think he wants entered. Dr. Beasom, do you know how much more time for some of the other questions? You have a bunch more questions that you would like to go into. Commissioner Mikula, do you have more questions you would like to go into? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Very few. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: I notice that members of the audience may have some questions. So the thing we probably need to settle is in that it is noon should ' we come back after lunch? THE CLERK: I'm going to be out of tape much longer and your office is locked. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Why don't we go ahead if it is all right with everybody go to lunch and come back at at 1:15. Would that be all right with the court reporter? Okay. (Lunch break taken.) 242 123 • 1 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: This court is back in 2 session. Let the record reflect that Commissioner 3 Kahn is not here. He intends to be back a little bit 4 later but we still have Commissioner Mikula and 5 Commissioner Smith. Before we recessed for lunch Dr. 6 Sam Beasom was about to ask some questions or to 7 continue on. Dr. Beasom, I will ask you at this time 8 to go ahead with your line of discussion. 9 DR. SAM BEASOM: I would like to continue on. 10 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Could I ask you, Sam, to 11 speak a little bit louder for those in the back and • 12 for the court reporter. 13 DR. SAM BEASOM: I would like to continue on with 14 exploring the attwater prairie chicken just a little 15 bit further. It is my understanding that it is 16 accepted practice to graze areas where attwater 17 prairie chicken chicken is and that grazing is indeed 18 a necessary factor for proper attwater prairie chicken 19 management. 20 It is my understanding also that Matagorda Island 21 is within the natural range of the attwater prairie 22 chicken and there is at least one photograph taken in 23 1941 of a censuring activity for prairie chickens on 24 Matagorda Island. I don't know if the prairie • 25 chickens ever existed on Matagorda Island. It is a 243 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 situation where we have a real existing habitat or potential habitat for other endangered species for which grazing has been recognized as a necessary practice. And I would just wonder if it would not be prudent from the standpoint of just preparing an area for the possibility of another species if grazing would not be a needed practice from that standpoint? That's a question. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Are you asking me the question? DR. SAM BEASOM: Yes. MR. BRE14T GIEZENTANNER: Well, the plan makes allowance for considering those kinds of things down the line in the future. And as we discussed over at the priaire chicken meetings over in Victoria I have some personal thoughts along that line that perhaps the island would have some useful value as a site for prairie chicken re -introductions. And that is not closed out. I don't believe the way the new plan is designed it says that it allows us to use a natural tool, minimum tool whenever we can to achieve the purposes. But it doesn't exclude us -- I mean, it doesn't limit to us to those tools if we need another tool to use for a stated goal. If we determine that it was an objective to 124 244 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 125 re -introduce prairie chickens to Matagorda Island then we would look at all possibilites of what we need to do to make it work. It certainly could be considered in the future. But at this time I think we have got other things we are going to spend our time on in the immediate future to correct some things that are going on and then take a look down the line as whether that would be a viable re -introduction effort. I share your thoughts that it might be possible. DR. SAM BEASOM: I have several questions also relating to whooping cranes. I know Brent maintains that the whooping crane really is a relatively minor part of the Grazing Compatibility Statement. However, reference is made to whooping cranes in the narrative of that document a minimum of twenty times. So it's apparently relatively important. One of the negative impacts of grazing to whooping cranes that has -- is purported in that document with supporting -- with support from the thesis that we have mentioned previously by A & M students on the Aransas Refuge was that cattle are detrimental because they trample wolfberry plants. Wolfberry is a small shrubbery species. And looking at the methodology of the research project it is apparent that the sample site on the 245 126 1 grazed area for evaluating impacts to the wolfberry 2 plant was in an area where the rancher had placed feed 3 troughs for cattle to draw cattle into an area where 4 they normally didn't go to. 5 This is a common established range management 6 practice if you have part of a pasture that is not 7 utilized by livestock you can put salt or water or 8 mineral blocks or something, feed in an area to draw 9 cattle to it to get more efficient use of your range. 10 It just so happened that these wolfberry plants 11 occurred in areas where cattle didn't go very much so 12 they were drawn into this area artificially. 13 And that is at least one of the sample sites 14 where the impact to wolfberry was measured and it was 15 attributed to grazing by livestock. On the surface, 16 of course, that poses a very questionable sampling 17 scheme. 18 Further, however, looking in a text on brush 19 management by Dr. Charles Scifres, wolfberry is one of 20 the plants in there that he refers to in terms of 21 techniques for managing or controlling, if you will, 22 wolfberry plants. He states that top removal 23 treatments which would be mowing or chopping or 24 trampling by cattle have no effect on wolfberry plants 25 on survival. The only way to control it he indicates 246 127 • 1 is with fire. To suggest that fire be used as a 2 replacement for cattle on the island is counter to the 3 logic of managing that plant for whooping cranes if 4 that is an important plant for whooping cranes. 5 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: May I make a comment on 6 that? 7 DR. SAM BEASOM: Yes, please. 8 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The wolfberry plants 9 grow at the margins of the marsh right where the marsh 10 joins the gulf. This is a natural area for cattle to 11 trail as they move from one area to another because it 12 is generally an area that has got somewhat reduced 13 vegetation. It's more or less kind of like salt flat • 14 type vegetation. 15 The comments that you made about the top removal 16 do not affect plant survival but we have found that 17 they can very drastically affect the fruit production 18 on those wolfberries. And the fruit is what the 19 whooping cranes eat. It is not the leaves of the 20 plants and those things. Another point that I was 21 going to try to make on that issue but I don't recall 22 what it was exactly. 23 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Mr. Giezentanner, with 24 reference to the wolfberry plant, what is the 25 importance to that -- to the whooping crane's diet? 247 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 128 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It's one of the primary • food items in the whooping crane's diet and primarily November and December when the birds first arrive. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: About what percentage does that make up? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I don't know what the figures on that are but they commonly show up -- JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: About 10 percent? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I wouldn't hazard a guess at this point. I do also know though that in respect to the burning program that because of the location of those plants on the fringes of the marsh right where the marsh joins the upland they would • probably not be impacted by the burning program because that's not where we intend to concentrate most Of our burning activities. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Does any other species of bird use this as a food source? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I suspect that others do but I don't have any figures on that. It tastes kind Of like a little cranberry. hind of like a cross between a cranberry and a tomato. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Dr. Beasom, do you have any information on that? DR. SAM BEASOM: This thesis reports that at the 0 129 • 1 same time of year that whooping cranes are utilizing 2 it it comprises 60 percent of the diet of the sand 3 hill cranes. 4 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: So if cattle are 5 detrimental to the wolfberry are we saying that we 6 should do something about the sand hill cranes because 7 they are also detrimental to the wolfberry which is a 8 primary -- I mean, is this the logic from that? 9 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. It's not the logic. 10 Because the sand hill cranes are also wildlife and 11 cattle are not wildlife. And on a National Wildlife 12 Refuge wildlife is given priority, domestic livestock. 13 MR. JOE HAWES: Might I add a little something • that 14 about wolfberry? In fact, I didn't know was even 15 the name of them until not too long ago. I read it 16 somewhere. We used to make preserves out of them when 17 we lived on Matagorda Island. 18 But we're talking about two different things. 19 We're talking about cattle grazing, we're talking 20 about whooping cranes. They're not near each other 21 not within many miles of each other. One is not 22 impacting the other one on Matagorda Island. On the 23 Refuge probably, yes. But not on Matagorda Island. 24 They are not together not within many miles of each 25 other. So the wolfberry, cattle grazing and the 249 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 130 whooping cranes is not a viable comparison here at all. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, that again was only given brief mention in the Compatibility Determination as well, Joe. To a degree I would agree with you on that point. I did not bring it up in this discussion. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Kind of like the whooping crane was just figured in from a minor standpoint into the Matagorda Island Management Plan. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It was a factor but not necessarily the most important factor. It's one of many. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: You mentioned you had another point MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, it was about the fact that our burning program would probably not be occurring in the area where the wolfberry grows. For one thing it's almost impossible to burn that area because there is not enough vegetation down there to carry the fires. It is not the type of vegetation to carry a fire. DR. SAM BEASOM: And on the other hand, it's an area that cattle don't go into either. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It's an area on Aransas A ❑1 250 • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 131 anyway it's an area where cattle commonly trail. And when the feed troughs were removed we still had trampling on those plants because that was an area where it was easy for the cattle to move. And perhaps it was because they had established travel lanes. It perhaps was an area that was just easier to move from Point A to Point B and the cattle will take their most easiest access roads. DR. SAM BEASOM: I would like to look further at the whooping crane still from the Aransas Refuge Study that conclusions are made from the study that grazing is detrimental to whooping cranes and whooping cranes are seldom observed in grazed pastures. I spent considerable time in evaluating the data evaluation of this study. And there are a set of five diagrams -- maps in this study that show distribution of whooping cranes sightings in the various study pastures. There was five study pastures. Three of which were grazed and burned; one of which was burned only and one of which was a controlled -- nothing, no burning or grazing done to it. And I just -- I saw the conclusion that was made which was available to Brent and others to read and I just -- it looked fairly difficult to follow the conclusion from the data so I just did an analysis of it. 251 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 132 And if you looked at all five of these diagrams there's a total of 87 percent of all whooping crane sightings were from the pastures that were grazed and burned; 12 percent of the sightings were from burned only and 1 percent was from where neither one of those practices were done. This implies to me that grazing apparently in that Aransas Refuge Study there must not have been some real detrimental effect of the presence of cattle to whooping cranes as evidenced by the data that are presented in the study that's used to say that grazing is incompatible with whooping cranes. There is another -- some other interpretation from this study. Conclusions are made that grazing is detrimental to whooping cranes because it results in a net loss of arthropod in this case insect biomass. The amount of insect biomass in various pastures. That's a conclusion that is made. This conclusion also is not supported by the data. The data show that in one year -- there's two years of data; in one year there was more biomass of insects in grazed pastures. In one year there was more biomass of insects in the ungrazed pasture and the other year the reverse was true. To me, this suggests that there is some other 252 133 • 1 variable more important than grazing perhaps in 2 affecting the the abundance of arthropods. Other 3 researchers show many, many references to the effect 4 that grazing has little effect on biomass of insects. 5 It will affect species composition or the different 6 kinds of insects who might have a very heavily grazed 7 area and very lightly grazed area. They have the same 8 amount of insects but you have a different kind in 9 each place. Some of them prefer denuded areas and 10 some prefer more vegetation. 11 The results of that, again the arthropod 12 abundance and biomass are not supported by these 13 thesis. Although that conclusion is used as evidence • 14 that grazing is detrimental it is also indicated that 15 the presence of cattle around the ponds on the island 16 are detrimental, well, in the Aransas study -- let me 17 back that up -- I'm referring to the Aransas study 18 The presence of cattle around the ponds in the Aransas 19 study are detrimental because cattle disturb the 20 vegetation around the shoreline and alter the 21 composition of organisms that live in the water. This 22 is not supported by the data in the thesis. The 23 thesis, I have got three pages of direct quotes here 24 from the thesis. There were in each of those five 25 study pastures one pond was selected to evaluate, to 253 134 1 make these measurements out of. There's no -- there's 2 nothing in this writing that tells us or anyone who's 3 a reader how those ponds were selected. There's a 4 total of 37 ponds in the study area; five were 5 selected for evaluation. One in each area. 6 Here is some quotes from this work. "Each pond 7 was distinct and characterized by different water 8 depth water surface area and vegetative components 9 thus direct comparison between ponds are difficult." 10 The next one, "Small fresh water ponds are known for 11 their extreme variability in terms of their physical 12 and biological components. Adjacent ponds with 13 similar substrates, inflows and environmental 14 influences are likely to exhibit distinctly different 15 floras and faunas which fluctuate asynchronism. This 16 variability about the small pond communities hinders 17 the analysis of impacts caused by grazing and 18 additional habitats." 19 However, the conclusion drawn from this 20 information was that grazing was detrimental. 21 Further, if you carry this in an analysis of the data 22 in the study to look at the organisms in those ponds 23 between the different study areas, you cannot arrive 24 at the conclusion that without question cattle -- the I 25 presence of cattle resulted in a negative impact to 254 • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 organisms in the pond. Variation between study areas prevented that. It is also rendered that grazing by cattle around the ponds is negative because it destroys vegetation around the ponds. The statement is made that fresh water sources used by cranes had less than 10 percent emergent vegetative cover and those were used more frequently than any of the areas with higher emergent cover. Water sources with high visibility appeared to be selected over sources with less -- which were less open. Again that conclusion there that grazing was detrimental to whooping cranes again cannot be made from the data and from the statements. The actual statements, these are quotes made in the thesis, again, which was used to at least in part to develop the Compatibility Statement. Do you have any evaluations of that? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I do have a couple of comments. The Hunt Study is only one of about thirteen references that we used in defense of the study itself. We assisted in that study in that we helped design the grazing program that would be implemented that Dr. Beasom referred to earlier for some pastures had twice the intensity as other pastures. But the study design, the statistical 135 255 1 E 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 136 analysis and things of that nature were designed by Texas A & M University. The researcher, Dr. Hunt, went through a complete and thorough evaluation by his committee one which having gone through a similar process to a lesser degree when I got my Master's degree I know how intensive the scrutiny on these studies is because the people on -- the professors on the committees of these people do not want their reputation marred by allowing a study to go through that does not stand up to statistical analysis. I have a lot of confidence in the professors that were overseeing this particular study and in defense of the individual who wrote it, I would -- I am certain that this underwent a similar scrutiny and the reputation of Texas A & M is standing behind the study itself. I was not here during the period of that study so I don't know exactly everything that went into it. The conclusions reached that Dr. Beasom referred to were the conclusions of the author and the individual who did the study. And I think it is very important to remember that it has gone through a very thorough peer analysis.by some very well respected scientists on the Texas A & M staff who reviewed this work. It's -- you can take any study and take bullet 256 137 • 1 statements out of the study and discuss them in any 2 group somewhat out of context of the work that's gone 3 into it and raise a lot of questions about virtually 4 anything that has gone on. There again, it does tend 5 to point out where we would be five years from now if 6 we did the study which you have been talking about, 7 Commissioner, we are still going to have people who 8 don't agree with the findings for one reason or 9 another and we would still be having the debate five 10 years down the line. 11 But that is only one of approximately -- I don't 12 recall exactly how many references that I had listed • 13 in the back of the Compatability Determination but it 14 was at least thirteen and this is one of thirteen. 15 And to be quite frank I used that study but not to a 16 great deal in making my decision. It was just one of 17 many factors. I never have said that this is a 18 cattle/whooping crane problem in isolation of 19 everything that's going on. 20 DR. SAM BEASOM: One of the problems that was 21 also mentioned in the Compatability Statement was 22 trailing of cattle -- trailing in the dunes and this 23 sort of thing. was that correct? 24 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's correct. . 25 Trampling and trailing. 257 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 138 DR. SA14 BEASOM: The literature on grazing management states very emphatically that trailing again is a function of stocking density. The higher the stocking density the more trailing will occur. So here again, we have another example of a situation that the fact that there is trailing or any degree of trailing is just a function of how many cattle are there. Not that cattle are there. So that problem, if indeed it is a problem, is one that could be managed by density. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Perhaps. Earlier you introduced into the record Dr. Beasom's analysis of the Compatibility Determination. I took the liberty of having another individual analyze the Compatibility Determination and Dr. Beasom's analysis. I have a single copy of that which I would like to have a copy made and entered into the record and it's Dr. McAllister, Wayne McAllister's report that he did at my request. Be received nothing for it. And it was introduced into the final hearing record on November 16, so it is a matter -- it is in the official record already at this time. Dr. McAllister is the biology professor at Victoria College and is a very well -- very knowledgeable individual on coastal ecosystems. And I 258 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 139 have a copy here and I will get a copy made yet today and get it to you and introduced into the record. If you would like to see it I can give it to you. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Is that Pinky McAllister? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: You keep referring to him and you did in the earlier meeting as Pinky McAllister. I know him as Dr. Wayne McAllister. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I didn't. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, someone did. I believe it was Mr. Null that kept referring to him as Pinky McAllister. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Has he ever done any study or done any work where he received compensation for and from the Aransas Wildlife Refuge or from the Department of Interior or Fish & Wildlife? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: He has been a volunteer for us and has written a guide book to the Aransas Refuge. We do sell the guidebook through our visitor center and he receives proceeds from that sale but he did that as an independent project. IIe has also produced for us a trail guide to the Heron Flats Trail which the SCCIHA, Southwest Cultural And National Heritage Association sells for the cost of printing that. He receives nothing for that. 259 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 140 He also developed an 800 plant list for us as a volunteer without compensation. He also has -- is working on another trail guide to the Big Tree Trail for us at no compensation. And he is working on a guide book to Matagorda Island and I believe that one will probably be sold. But we receive benefits from that in that it helps educate people abc.,it the natural history of the island so people Can understand the island and how it works better. But he has received nothing from us in the way of a payroll or anything like that. He has n;�ver been on our payroll and he has done a tremendous amount of volunteer work for us as have many other people. We have a very large volunteer program on the refuge where a lot of people do a lot of work for us for free because they believe in doing work to benefit wildlife and our wildlife heritage. Dr. McAllister is one of those people. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I'm going to ask something and then I know, Dr. Beasom, we need to get back to his. But when did you say that you made the decision or served the notice to the Hawes? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: March 2, 1990. Two months after his permit had expired. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I wonder why the 260 141 • 1 biologist who wrote -- who authored the reports that I 2 indicated -- I wonder why that information was not 3 utilized? Apparently it was just put on the back 4 burner. Those people have years of experience on 5 Matagorda Island and you along with perhaps other 6 information based your decision on Mr. Clark's report 7 which -- and he's only had two years. 8 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Partially on Mr. Clark's 9 report. I also based it on 25 years of experience. I 10 was not aware of the state biologist report until I 11 was reviewing Mr. Hawes's appeal at the first level of • 12 appeal when Hugh Hawes presented that to me in a 13 meeting at the Aransas Refuge at which time I took 14 that, added it to the record, reviewed that 15 information. 16 I have personally a lot of a problem with a lot 17 of the stuff that's in there because it's their 18 personal opinion based on a different set of 19 objectives. If you'll go through that document that 20 Dennis Brown and Don Frels and Charles Sutuzenbaker 21 and David Mabie wrote most of that is based on a way 22 of managing that they have been doing for many years 23 which was to benefit primarily quail, deer and doves. 24 I'm not saying what they were doing was wrong. • 25 I'm saying what they are doing was different than from 261 1 E 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 142 what we are going to do. We have a different set of goals and objectives and so many of the comments that they made did not apply to the current decision. They were for a different reason. And a lot of that was based on their personal opinions. Just like you have an opinion and I have an opinion. I will state this. The Parks & Wildlife Department's official position at the present time is that the cattle will be removed from the island for the next five years. And these biologists have expressed their opinion as all government employees get to do in the process in the way we work. You tell your bosses what you think and your bosses make decisions. And the bosses decision in the particular case The Parks & Wildlife Department was that the cattle will be removed from the island for the next five years. Their biologists were heard. Their opinions were not accepted. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: And the decision was made before they even reviewed their report? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I will have to go back and look. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Who was the boss that made that decision? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I believe at the time 262 C • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 143 Bobby Alexander was the acting Chief of the Wildlife Division and Dick Gravis was the chairman -- was,the executive director. I would have to go back and look at the chronology. COMMISSIONER MIKULA: Well, Bobby Alexander does not agree with the removal of the cattle. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I'm not a member of the Parks a Wildlife Department so I'm not privy exactly to all of the discussions that went on there. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But, you know, we still don't have a study of grazing on Matagorda Island. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. We don't. And I still maintain that we don't need one and if we had one we would still be sitting here five years from today having the same discussions because the opinions are so polarized on this issue that I don't think the facts are going to make that much difference in anybody's mind. It's not a situation where people are able to divorce themselves from what this has done quite frankly to the Hawes family. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, you know, since it is so polarized why not have a study and continue grazing while you have a study? Have an area that's grazed and have an area that's not grazed and 263 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 144 do an independent study and then stick by the findings of that study. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Do you want to commit the taxpayers of Calhoun County to pay for that study? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: No. I'm saying let's go with the legislation that's pending in Congress or will be pending. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I'm not doing anything to influence that legislation in any fashion. It's illegal for me to do so. I cannot lobby Congress. What Congress does is Congress's business. And if Congress tells us we will do the study, we will do the study. If Congress doesn't tell us to do the study we won't do the study. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But by that time the cattle will be removed from the island. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Quite possibly. If they come off they can.go back on if Congress tells us to. But right now I'm not -- I don't have the ability or the authority to do that. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I just have to ask why don't you have that authority? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I explained that to you earlier, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: You had the 264 • • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 145 authority to terminate it? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. I do. Because I found it's incompatible and it's harmful to the island. And if I have made that finding it is illegal for me to continue that activity. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: You cannot re-evaluate your position based on new information? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I have re-evaluated my position a thousand times based on new information that I receive all the time. There's nothing -- nothing that has come up here today that is new information. That's why I question in my letter to you, Judge, as to whether this was going to serve any useful purpose because there is no new information. We keep telling the same story over and over and over again. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I think some of the points that Dr. Beasom has brought up and probably will bring up more is new information. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I'm aware of those points. I've been aware of those points all along. I also have confidence in the peer review that the study has gone through at Texas A & M University. I have utmost respect for Dr. Slack at Texas A & M and he was a primary professor on this study. He's the former 265 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 146 past president of the Texas Wildlife Society and that's a very prestigious group. And I have confidence in the information that has been given to me. There are ways -- you can take any isolated bit of information out of context or in isolation and roll it up and shoot holes in just about anything but that doesn't necessarily mean it has any greater degree of credibility. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I wonder why as long as cattle grazing was permitted on the Wynne property cattle grazing was not incompatible? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It was not on National Wildlife Refuge when Mr. Wynne grazed it. So there is no question of compatibility. Compatibility only applies when you have a National Wildlife Refuge. A rancher has a different set of objectives. On private lands a rancher has the total authority to do what he wants to with his lands. When that becomes a National Wildlife Refuge compatibility then applies. And what happened under private ownership up to that point is immaterial. There is no question of compatibility with a private rancher and a landowner. It only applies when it becomes a National Wildlife Refuge. 266 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 • 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 147 MR. JOE HAWES: It was a refuge when Wynne grazed his half of land right here (indicating). MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: And the same reasons that it was being grazed were the same reasons that you were grazing. MR. JOE HAWES: Yes. There was no problem with the grazing until Wynne removed his cattle. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: What you are telling me though, Joe, is that we have to allow something to continue because we can never have more information on it to make some other decisions? MR. JOE HAWES: No. I was just correcting you when you said it wasn't a refuge when he grazed it. Which it was. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, I'm sorry. I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about on Wynne's private property. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, I was but I also meant the other area too. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Then the same standards should have applied to Wynne grazing the southernmost two pastures of the Matagorda Island State Park and Wildlife management area as applied to your operation on the north end. MR. JOE HAWES: Correct. 267 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 148 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: What I told you earlier was there was no opportunity to review that whole process until the the end of the five-year plan. That's the first chance that I had to take -- get a look -- to take a look at it under are the strict confines of compatibility. And quite frankly, ladies and gentlemen, we basically just turned our back on 1982 and said, "State, you go manage it the way you want to. Here is the broad confines of the National Wildlife Refuge Management System. You've got to find a way to keep.it within the very broad guidelines of that and their goals were managing it for quail, deer, and doves." We backed off and are looking at things much differently now. You mentioned earlier, Joe, about some things that happened with the red wolves back in 1964. That breaks my heart to know that my agency in those days helped contribute to the extinction of the species. In 1964 we had no Endangered Species Act and the reason why red wolves were being controlled -- the Endangered Species Act was passed in 1966 and the reason why we were controlling red wolves at that time was because of the grazing permittee's operations on Aransas National Wildlife Refuge which caused us to have to go out and reduce the predator population il 149 • 1 which was causing a problem for his cattle. 2 The Refuge Administration Act was not passed 3 until 1966 about the same time the initial Endangered 4 Species Act was passed. And at that time that's when 5 compatibility came to play and we would never in 6 today's world with today's laws be allowed nor would 7 we ever want to go out and try to expatriate a species 8 like the red wolves on a National Wildlife Refuge. 9 I1R. JOE HAWES: That wasn't my point. The point 10 was that the expertise of the Refuge System should 11 have foreseen the concentration of red wolves become 12 extinct through their effort. That's what I'm getting • 13 at. 14 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I assume that's one of 15 the things that led to the passage of things like the 16 Endangered Species Act was because we did see a need 17 for those kinds of things. We also -- that also 18 helped lead to the passage of the Refuge 19 Administration Act of 1966 that said quite clearly we 20 are not supposed to go do this kind of thing on 21 National Wildlife Refuges especially for the benefit 22 of an economic interest like a livestock operator. 23 But we didn't have those goals back there -- those 24 guidelines back there. • 25 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But since 1966 you 269 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 150 allowed some cattle grazing on the Aransas Wildlife Refuge? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Yes. We did. Back in 1966 through -- any time you pass a new act, for instance, the Endangered Species Act that gave us the real teeth was 1973. And that's about the same time that the Corps of Engineers built a bunch a levees right through the middle of the whooping crane habitat on the Aransas Refuge. Had we known then what We know today the Corps of Engineers would have been hauling off that dredging spoil for the last twenty years. They would have never put a cubic yard of dredging spoil on the Aransas Wildlife Refuge. But it takes awhile for the agencies to get in place the mechanisms that they need to use these laws. We have always been subjected to a tremendous amount of political pressure. In this blue report that I gave to the Judge earlier, the number one incompatible use on refuges all around the nation is grazing. The number one conflict on refuges under the compatibility guidelines is grazing. And the number one reason why we have incompatible grazing activities on refuges is because of local and political pressures Congress violating their own laws in situations like we see going on 2'70 • 1 2 • • 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 151 here. Now if you change the law that's one thing. If you change the law, I have got no problem with that. I live within whatever laws I have to apply. But if you are telling me that I have to go against the law to do my job I can't do that. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: How is Congress violating its own law? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: By requiring refuge managers around the country to violate their own standards of compatibility and keep incompatibility uses of all types, not just grazing. There's a lot of other things. A good example is a lake in Nevada. A refuge in Nevada and the name escapes me where Congress -- where the refuge manager tried to get rid of water skiing on the main lake that he had at his refuge and it was in a redhead nesting habitat. And Congress told him no you cannot get rid of the water skiing on that refuge because too many people raised a stink, about it because they didn't like losing the recreation. So that refuge manager had to continue to allow water skiing on that refuge in the heart of a redhead duck nesting area because Congress told him he had to do it. 271 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 152 You know we are not immune from political pressure either. We try to be. Congress tells us we should be. But there are occasions when we just flat can't be immune to it. A prime example was earlier in a previous administration when we had a Secretary of Interior who did not believe that there was anything that was incompatible on a National Wildlife Refuge. You could build a strip mine right in the middle of that whooping crane habitat. And that was going to be considered compatible because of his own personal political perspective. So we're not exempt from this at all. But the current administration believes very strongly that we should apply this compatibility standard very rigidly and very professionally which we've tried to do. And Congress has told us they're going to hold us to that standard. And the recent attention that has been focused on this issue by reference as evidenced by the documents that I have given to you, show very clearly that we are under a lot of scrutiny right now to not compromise that principal. I'm sorry I talk so fast. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Dr. Beasom? DR. SM4 BEASOM: I have indicated before to Brent and then in my response.to that compatibility 272 153 • 1 statement about burning as a minimum tool of 2 management and question the wisdom of replacing 3 grazing with fire as a tool to manage a barrier island 4 when statements for compatibility statements about 5 cattle are brought up about trailing and causing 6 erosion of dunes and this sort of thing. The 7 potential for fire to have that kind of impact is far 8 greater than grazing ever would be. The effects of 9 grade grazing or I'm not talking about over -grazing, 10 I'm talking about grazing. With different levels of 11 grazing -- we have tried to establish here today with • 12 different levels of grazing we can have different 13 impacts on vegetation. 14 Grazing is a relatively selected and slow in 15 removing vegetation. Fire is a violent and very fast 16 method completely denudes a burned area within a 17 matter of minutes or hours or whatever exposing the 18 surface of large tracts of land to the elements 19 whether it be wind or whatever. And if burns are 20 planned and dry weather follows burns the possibility 21 of getting very little regrowth is very, very high. 22 And if that particular set of circumstances happens 23 the possibility of compromising the integrity of 24 Matagorda Island are far greater than with properly • 25 controlled grazing. 273 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 154 I'm aware that the intent of the refuges plans are to use small spot burns scattered throughout the island and not to burn large areas. I'm fully aware of that. However, to cover an area as large as Matagorda Island with burns only as a management tool there would have to be large expanses of grassland that are left unburned each year and you might have three or four or even five years in between burns. And if that be the case the possibility of having tremendous fuel loads, ie., grass that grows, dies back and grows again is not trampled or utilize by cows is not burned off it just grows and dies and stays there. You have a tremendously high possibility for a wildfire. And even though the best intentions of the refuge are just to use spot burns to minimize the detrimental impacts of post -fire erosion, the fact remains that there could be wildfires that would revert the intended benefit of controlled fire. Do you have a comment on that? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, I share your concerns about fire. I believe that we need to get a chance to develop our plan. And I will continue to be interested in knowing what your concerns are with that plan. It's not something that we are going to develop 274 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 155 in isolation and devoid of input from other sources. And it's something that I certainly will want to put out into the community -- the scientific communities for evaluation before we start implementing our plan. I share some of the same concerns that you do. I believe that we can design a plan that will achieve our purposes though. Basically what we have got here is we have had cattle as the tool whether it is controllable or not is a matter of debate. We have had cattle in place on the island for 150 years. I would like to try it with fire for five years and see what we can do. Maybe we will find that we can't do it. I am willing to take a look and be evaluated at all times on whether we are achieving our programs. I believe we can design a program that will achieve our objectives for wildlife using fire as a tool instead of grazing as a tool for the next five years. DR. SA14 BEASOM: In the Aransas Study this is sheer speculation but we are talking about burning only versus grazing and burning. The whooping crane presence in treated areas on the Aransas studies show that. I mean, if you just look at the data from the thesis; 87 percent of all whooping cranes used areas that were grazed, the burned areas received relatively light use. The burned only areas. Now it is a 275 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 156 • possibility that if you use some level of grazing with the burning study you would drastically minimize the - problems of wild fire. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Perhaps. DR. SAM BEASOM: Because you don't have the fuel build up. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, Mr. Hawes has maintained in some previous meetings that there has never been a wildfire on Matagorda Island. So obviously you do get some control over your burns by grazing the land. • MR. JOE HAWES: To my knowledge, of course, I haven't been there but 70 years, I've never heard of a wildfire on Matagorda Island started by natural causes. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: So obviously cattle can reduce.your fuel loads. I mean there's no dispute about that. I think if you would go back and revisit the data on the study on Aransas you'll find two other factors come into play on whooping crane use. One is the acorn crop in the uplands. We don't have acorns on Matagorda Island so that is not a factor. The other is one wet year when we had a big bloom of crawfish and the whooping cranes had moved into those pastures to feed on crawfish. 276 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 157 And it may have been -- I would have to go back and revisit the data but it may well have been those factors had more to do with the presence of birds in a particular location than it did whether the pasture was grazed or burned. We don't get good acorn crops every year down at Aransas. And that's one respect where that study is not directly transferable to the island because of the acorn crop. That's one of our goals in Aransas is managing our acorn crops for whooping cranes. And we try to burn in that year when we had good acorn crops so we can expose the acorns for the birds. And that doesn't occur in every year so we don't get to burn every year. But we have a prescribed fire program at Aransas where we burn between six and ten thousand acres a year. I have seven people on the staff that have gone to the basic fire management schools and I've just put a fire ecologist on our staff who has fifteen years of experience with the Forest Service as a range conservationist and fire ecologist. So we plan to do our burning program in a very scientific manner. And it will be undergoing quite a bit of outside scrutiny. We've got a lot of people looking over our shoulder. Everybody from the air 277 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 158 quality people to wildlife biologist. The grazing industry is very interested because I'm sure they are hoping to a certain degree we'll fail and it will give credence then to grazing as a tool of choice. DR. SAM BEASOM: The main points here though is I think we are just shooting by it or missing it or something but there has been grazing for years on Matagorda and there has not been a serious problem. The potential with fire -- fire only is much, much greater to cause a problem. And so we are giving up our -- I say "we" very loosely here but the collective decision has been to give up on a practice that has been tried and proven, so to speak, to one that is possibly very, very dangerous in terms of maintaining the integrity of Matagorda Island. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: When you say there has been no problem, what do you mean? DR. SAM BEASOM: No serious erosion problems. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Do we know what the island would have been like today without the cattle? No. We don't. And you mentioned earlier we can't go back to the days of the dinosaur. I don't think we are trying to do that. Some people have misinterpreted what we are trying to do here and accused us of trying to just walk away from the island 278 159 • 1 and do nothing and let everything reach a climax 2 grassland stage which is essentially pretty 3 unproductive when you look at it in terms of wildlife. 4 And that's.not our goal at all. 5 We plan to maintain the island in a wide variety 6 of disclimax stages where we have got everything from 7 areas that just recently burned and areas that haven't 8 been burned in ten years. We also plan to keep 9 control areas in there because it's hard to know where 10 we would be today if we hadn't done anything if we 11 don't have some control. 12 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But has the • 13 Matagorda Island accreted? 14 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Has it what? 15 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Accreted? 16 MR. JOE HAWES: Yes. It's one of the few islands 17 that has accretion. It has not I think -- it will 18 fall in line with the rest of them since they built so 19 many dams to start capturing all of the outflow from 20 all of the rivers and all in time. But it has not. 21 You go back to the earliest maps there is and it is 22 still there. Only part that has deteriorated is up on 23 the point starting about even with the old air base. 24 That point is cutting off and that's probably caused • 25 by the ship channel. 279 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 160 A & M is taking pictures of it every so often from the stratosphere watching that this never happens in anybody's lifetime. They want to see how that works on Pass Cavallo. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: And Noah is doing a fairly intensive bathometric study right now. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Apparently grazing hasn't been detrimental to the wildlife. I think the whooping crane numbers increased over the years, hasn't it? Only they, of course, are only a small portion of the island. But apparently that hasn't been detrimental to the whooping crane and that is -- although you don't admit it that's the major reason it's a wildlife refuge going back before your time? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Which are you referring to? Matagorda or Aransas? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I'm talking about Matagorda Island. If you go back the whooping crane population has increased although they don't use but a small portion of the Matagorda Island's southern tip where there was grazing for a number of years, the population has increased. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The two areas of the island were established for different authorities. The northern area was established for migratory birds • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 161 not whooping cranes. If you go back to the initial authorities that established the northern part -- the Matagorda Island State Park and Wildlife Management Area a unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System in the documents that transferred that to Fish & Wildlife Service it states very clearly in there for migratory birds -- for the National Migratory Bird Program. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I understand that. The whooping crane falls right into that area though. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The Wynne properties they are migratory birds as well as endangered species. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: So why don't you just admit it? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Because they're two distinct authorities that we have to operate under, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Oh, come on. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: The areas on the southern end of the island were acquired under the Land and Water Conservation Fund for Endangered Species. Specifically for endangered species. MR. CHRIS PEASE: I wanted to flashback a little bit to this issue on the fire. I haven't been 281 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 162 speaking very much but on this point, you know, a lot of the arguments for maintaining the grazing program is based on perhaps a historical use back with the bison in the area and evolution of the plains grasses with large ungulates grazing in a particular type vegetation communities. Well, fire is also a very big part of that evolution of these plant communities and it's kind of hard to argue one as a necessary tool because it was evolutionary there without arguing the other one to be there. So you have to look at them both in the same mode. And really at least as far as the island goes until 150 years ago it probably did not see any great numbers of large herbivores. People that worked on bison have shown that their times down here were very limited in very few numbers. So we're not really looking at a heavy historical use in this part of the world by bison. But probably one of the bigger compounds was fire. I'm not really sure that until we look at a program that does some significant amount of growing out there we are waving a lot of red flags that might be associated with it but it's, you know, if we are going to argue that these things could evolve, grazing • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 163 and fire, then fire is in chat context a very viable tool for an ecosystem. I think we need to put those two things up at the same level because they were both there in the grasslands. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: One of the other factors in Howard Hunt's study that we determined very quickly was the fact that in areas where we had been grazing we could not implement our fire management program because there was not enough litter in there to carry the fire. So it was very difficult for many years to use a grazing and burning program. Now that could have been a flaw in the way the study was designed or whatever, I don't know. I wasn't here at the time. But I do know that this also applied over on the Tatton Addition when we had cattle over there especially during the drought years. we had some things that we needed to do with fire to control brush and we could not do it because the cattle had removed all of the litter. And so basically we were left with grazing as the only tool instead of the grazing/burning combination. It is very difficult to manipulate the two together. JUDGE HOWARD IIARTZOG: Let me call a recess right now so that our court reporter can relax her fingers for a few seconds. We will be recessed for about ten 283 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 minutes. (Short break taken). JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. We will be back in session. Dr. Beasom, any additional questions? DR. SA4 BEASOM: I don't have anything else. Directly, no. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Mr. Giezentanner, do you have anything else directly? MR. GIZENTANNER: Not directly. No. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Anyone else? MR. JOE HAWES:. Mr. Giezentanner said he didn't see anything new at any of these meetings that he hadn't heard before. Perhaps this might be. Me, my wife, my oldest boy, his wife Theodora Hawes and State Senator Armbrister -- he was representative then -- met with Edwin Cox, Jr. who is chairman of the Texas Parks & Wildlife in the Capitol building in Washington -- I mean, in Austin -- the capitol building in Austin. And we discussed this very -- all of the situation and he said to State Senator Armbrister who asked about this, he said, "It's not me that's calling the shots or causing you 164 165 • 1 all of the problems on Matagorda Island," he says, 2 "it's people more powerful than me that's calling the 3 shots." Is the word he used. And I said, "Like who?" 4 And he didn't bat an eye. He said,,"Perry Bass and 5 Jim Wright." And I said in my own words, "What in the 6 hell has Perry Bass or Jim Wright have to do with 7 Matagorda Island?" And he shook his finger in my face 8 and he said, "You will be surprised." 9 I just want to give you a little background of 10 the happenings on Matagorda Island as far as the Parks 11 & Wildlife are concerned. We were -- y'all mentioned • 12 13 about the large grazing animals and the whooping cranes, where did Wood Buffalo National Park -- isn't 14 that where the whooping cranes do best where the 15 buffalo were famous for by the millions years ago? 16 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Wood Buffalo National 17 Park is about 3.4 million acres and the whooping 18 cranes nest in the very inaccessible marshy parts of 19 that National Park. It is named after bison. That's 20 correct. But they don't necessarily occur in the same 21 locations. 22 MR. JOE HAWES: That's always been curious to me 23 that their stomping grounds was in the same place as 24 the buffalo. • 25 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, they're in the 285 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 166 same place within the confines of 3.4 million acres but they're not within the same confines of where -- they are not rubbing shoulders. MR. JOE HAWES: I would loot: for everybody to get it real clear that even my picture of Matagorda Island the cattle and the whooping crane are not competitive in any way, they can see each other only. They are not up on higher ground -- the whooping crane isn't. The cattle are. The wolfberry, if you can find me a trampled wolfberry even where the cattle are on Matagorda Island I'll eat it plant and all. The coons love wolfberry and so do the coyotes. The coons will live off of them entirely. But as far as cattle being a factor on Matagorda Island -- wolfberry consumption,by the whooping cranes is silly even to suggest that because the cattle is not where the whooping cranes are. It all comes down to the same thing as the reasoning for removing cattle. And it still -- naturally our heritage and roots are on Matagorda Island. And it just irks us no end to think that you want to institute a program that's unproved over something that is in its pristine condition because of cattle grazing. You are taking is • 2 • • L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 167 the last few years with this implemented grazing program which is ill advised at best and which we wrote out plan after plan for grazing programs and we were ignored completely. We would give reasons for them and did everything. They were absolutely ignored. And you mentioned that taxpayers subsidizing us? I don't go for that at all. The taxpayers are not subsidizing us. You are talking about a grazing lease. The grazing lease is where you have some control of your own cattle. This is not a grazing lease .in every sense of the word. We have no control over the cattle. They say, "You'll put your cattle here and keep them there until I tell them to go on. If they starve to death, tough. You can't separate your heifer you can't do nothing. We give you permission to keep them there and that's all." You have no control over your grazing herds. A grazing lease is entirely different. They was going to base our price on the -- according to Albuquerque they base our grazing fee on the going fee on similar hours. So they didn't come with any. The nearest thing they could find was a mainland grazing fee. That's entirely different. You'll pay double on mainland for sure or more because you can grab your 287 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RM animal up at the right time and go to market. There you have -- it's so expensive you have to send some to market when they're much too young and some that should have been gone long before. And you can't ever count them and you can't go up and grab them up and and take off to a vet. You can't afford to hire a vet and take him over there. And you have to do things over there that you would not do and I don't do on the mainland. I have some of my own operators on the mainland. It is an entirely different deal. But you are comparing two things that really don't make sense saying that the island operation is the same as any on mainland. It is not. If you are a multimillionaire like Toddie L. Wynne have your own barges and looking for an outlet to spend money. His foreman told me one time when the cattle prices got so high in 1979 I believe it was, he said Mr. Wynne said, "In spite of all hell it looked like he's going to make a profit for the first time on the cattle on Matagorda Island." He said, "We've been averaging losing $241,000.00 a year." So that gives you an example. We do our own work. We're real cheapos when it comes to ranching because we use our own family. We don't hire none. We have to -- you can't compare mainland operation with Matagorda • 1 2 3 4 A 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • 169 Island. It's different. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's been my point all along, Joe, is that it is different. And they're some very inherent -- deep-seated inherent problems with the ability of an operator to make a profit on the island and to have any flexibility in use of grazing as a tool as a manager because of that very factor. I never have maintained that it was the same as the mainland. That's my whole premise for this whole decision was that Matagorda Island is different. MR. JOE HAWES: Well, I know, but don't be quoting the fees for grazing on mainland for it is an entirely different situation than Matagorda Island comparing them. Albuquerque went through all that and they couldn't find any that even come near it. They come up with a figure, we didn't. The provisions in that lease they made, we didn't. We had nothing to do with it -- any of the provisions on our lease. Not even one thing. See, we had our grazing lease for the Air Force. We had no restrictions on numbers at all. But it was in that real good condition when the refuge took over because of that. We didn't overstock it. You are not going to overstock something on your own, not if you intend to stay in business. It's only when they an 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 170 instituted, like I say, have these programs where they forcing you to put cattle where they shouldn't be, cut off our access to the beach, cut off all of our water supplies. In that whole interpretive area they fenced in every water hole up there. And we had to dump, well, three times as many cattle that shouldn't have been there at that period of time and without any water supply. We had to put in more windmills in a hurry because they fenced off all of our water to where they couldn't get to it. The cattle couldn't get to it. It was deliberate. And they didn't put the fences where they were supposed to. I showed them and I went out and marked them and they would come back where we will build a fence where we want and so they did. But it just gives you an example of the real cooperation that we as long time ranchers and owners -- farm owners -- have had to try to to put up with. We were ignored like we wasn't there. And I'm talking mostly about Parks & Wildlife now. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Isn't it true that the interpretive area was fenced off to keep the cattle and the public from conflicting in that area? MR. JOE IiAWES: I don't have any idea what the interpretive as they call -- are you talking about the 290 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 171 lighthouse interpretive area? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That's correct. MR. JOE HAWES: It was originally planned they were going to have so many people walking through there that they were -- didn't want any cattle grazing at all and which they haven't had. And I would venture to say, well, I might be wrong but I haven't seen three people walking through that thing in years. No one is going to walk out in that overgrown vegetation decayed that deep and snakes and prickly pear and sand without a purpose. They are going to walk down the road and go to the beach but they don't use it. It is absolutely wasted. That 20 some hundred acres is wasted. If they wanted a little thing they could have fenced off a hundred yards square would have been more than the public needed for that purpose. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Well, in my mind this just does again point out one of the conflicts between other objectives for the use of a refuge in the area of public use, for instance, and a private operation. Under the new plan I think you all have already seen a big difference in the levels of public use that are occurring on the island in the last few months as the state moves toward their planned operations. The 291 172 1 presence of a school bus. 2 By the way, I would like to enter into the record 3 that that was a Fish & Wildlife Services barge that 4 took that school bus to the island. 5 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: So noted. 6 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Okay. Thank you. We've 7 been accused of trying to stop the public use on the 8 island and I think if we were trying to do that we 9 wouldn't have used the Fish & Wildlife barge to take 10 the school bus over there. 11 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Are you aware, sir, that 12 this court has made an offer to help the Fish & 13 Wildlife Service and the Parks & Wildlife Service to 14 have roads within its area of the disclaimerd 15 reservation. And as of yet we have not received any 16 reply indicating that we have access to our area of 17 disclaiming reservation. 18 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I was aware of your 19 letters. I was also advised that Andy Samson had 20 responded to that letter. I have not seen a copy of 21 his response at this time. But anyway this again just 22 points out another conflict. Now the public use 23 aspect did not play into my compatibility 24 determination at all. I don't think you will find any 25 reference in the compatibility determination to • • 292 173 1 cattle/people conflicts. It is not in there. Because • 2 public use was not one of the narrowly defined 3 purposes for which we acquired the area. That doesn't 4 mean that we can't allow public use on the area. But 5 it was not used in the strict analysis of 6 compatibility when I determined the incompatible 7 aspects of grazing operations. Public use in conflict 8 with people and stuff like that did not play into it. 9 I did read in the references from Clarence 10 Cottam, Dr. Cottam at the Welder Foundation, that was 11 one of his main concerns about getting the cattle off 12 of Padre Island was because of a perceived conflict he 13 saw there between cattle and wildlife. But he had • 14 other concerns as well about what the cattle were 15 doing to the island. But that was not part of my 16 decision. But it does point out another conflict that 17 does occur. The reason that the interpretive area was 18 fenced off was because they were trying to keep cattle 19 and people separate. 20 If Mr. Hawes is not worried about the liabilities 21 of conflicts between his cows and the public I'm sure 22 the Parks & Wildlife Department was because they would 23 have been liable ,if they were allowing something to 24 occur that had caused a safety hazard to the public. 25 You've got good gentle cows. They know you. But they 293 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 174 don't know John Q. Citizen and they may not know that you can't harass a cow and not expect it to react. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Commissioner Mikula? COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Brent, in the MOA or I quess it was in the -- or maybe it was the cooperative agreement where they talked about high visitation to the island attempting to build a case that there would be high visitation as many as 15,000 visitors to the island annually. And in the very same paragraph and I don't have it in front of me but didn't they also state high visitation to the island is unlikely at this time? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: At that moment in time that's correct. Because there was no structure in place, ie., passenger ferry to get people to the island. They're still working on that. COIMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: There still isn't, is there? MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: No. There isn't. But they're getting closeer all the time. And there's quite a bit of interest locally and from some other sources in getting that passenger ferry -- I'm not the best person to speak on that issue because I haven't been directly involved but Luke Thompson is the person you need to visit with on that. 294 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 175 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Yes. But you brought it up so I wanted to ask you about that. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: At that moment in time when those words were written there was no structure in place to increase the visitation. But the plan would allow that vehicle to occur. That it would give us the mechanism to implement and go out and seek those kinds of resources. There was one other point I would like to interject back into the record and I would like Chris to speak on that about the horned toad situation. Your comments earlier were very timely. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: And I'm very much concerned about it. We share your concern and I think Chris can give -- MR. CHRIS PEASE: I met this past weekend with a herbatoligist professor with UT at Arlington. And we were discussing this we were in the the draft phase. We're putting together a fire plan for Matagorda Island and the issue was horned lizards and using fire as a management tool. And it is his belief that at least with winter burns that these animals -- these particular animals are so far burrowed up under the soil that he cannot as an experienced and professional herbatoligist perceive where fire could be conceived 295 176 1 as a problem for the horned lizard population on the 2 island. And all this could be easily tested through, 3 you know, studies along with these types of burns. 4 So that was something I had just worked out with 5 in discussion with this one particular professor. So 6 I had mentioned that at lunch to Brent and he thought 7 that you might be aware that we are pursuing it and 8 very aware of this and to get back with Section 7 9 consultations. Anything that's going to affect the 10 state list of species -- we also work with the 11 Resource Protection Branch Texas Parks a Wildlife I 12 believe that group has the authority over the state 13 listed species. 14 Andy Price who I believe is the acting 15 herbatoligist for them so this wouldn't be done in a 16 vacuum. We would be getting the correct permits and 17 stuff to proceed with either some experimental burns 18 to see if there is an impact but at least popular 19 opinion within the professional world of herbatology 20 that they do not believe that given winter burns 21 that's going to be an issue with this particular 22 animal species. That's where that sits right now. 23 DR. SAM BEASOM: That is with fire killing the 24 animal, right? 25 MR. CHRIS PEASE: Right. That goes back to • • • 296 • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 M 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 177 Commissioner Hahn's story. DR. SAM BEASOM: what about, however, in the Endangered Species Act take -- can it imply harm to habitats? MR. CHRIS PEASE: Right. DR. SAM BEASOM: If the horned lizard needs areas maintained -- open areas maintained by grazing, well, a fire regime although it may not kill the animal outright it will doubtful would not provide the open habitat that the horned lizard would require. MR. CHRIS PEASE: Your previous statement was that fires will.leave denuded surfaces of the island and that does open up areas of the island. I'm not real sure -- I don't think horned lizards need grazing to provide that open system. They do -- actually, the key compound to these particular animals are the cut ends the harvest rains that are available and actually probably some of the work that needs to be done is to determine how we maintain those populations and that may be even more important than trying to manage directly for the horned lizard because that particular food supply, they're ant specialists so you have to make sure that the action that you take maintains that food supply in that -- COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But you most likely 297 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 178 will disturb them or endanger them if the Endangered Species Act calls for, let's see, harassing, endangering, threatening or disturbing endangered or threatened species. MR. CHRIS PEASE: Correct. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Now you're not going to do any of those things to that horned toad lizard? MR. CHRIS PEASE: What I'm saying is it is the learned position of people that work with these particular animals. Fire, anything will improve their habitat to increase their populations. And so, no, that is not a threat or a harassment or it does not fit as -- or does not go against those particular acts to protect these animals. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I see what you are getting at, Commissioner Milula, in that if we set a fire horney toads are going to run away or bury in the sand or they are going to be disturbed. The same thing you could carry the same logic to the degree if we put 500 cows in the pasture and the cattle walk through, the horney toads are going to run away or they are going to hide or they are going to bury. So it's a matter of degree what you are talking about here. e• 179 1 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But they're • 2 thriving with the cattle there and we don't know what 3 they are going to do with the fire there. 4 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: They are thriving to a 5 degree. We don't know how better they might thrive if 6 the cattle weren't there and we had a fire in place. 7 Primarily right now along the roads. So maybe the 8 roads are what we need. Maybe it's not cows or fires 9 or either one. Maybe it's the roads. 10 MR. JOE HAWES: I can say when they burned that 11 lighthouse interpretive area which it 20 some hundred 12 acres there wasn't a live horney toad in the whole 13 area. Corpses everywere of every snake, horney toad • 14 lizard, box turtle -- you name it, I took pictures of 15 them. They're dead. And they never will come back 16 for -- well, finally with the overgrowth I couldn't 17 tell whether they come back or not. But there was 18 none for months for sure. 19 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: If you recall, the 20 lighthouse burn was not supposed to have taken place. 21 That was not a strike fire. It was not a planned fire 22 in the appropriate sense of the word. 23 MR. JOE HAWES: It was planned to the extent they 24 didn't expect it to go the way it did. And they tried 25 to put fire range to stop it but it burned all the way 299 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9M to the Gulf. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: You say you have pictures? MR. JOE HAWES: I sent a picture to Audubon in Austin and got no answer back of the dead horney toads in that fire. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Do you have copies? Do you have them documented? MR. JOE HAWES: I probably have. I'll see. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: If you do we ought to include -- MR. JOE HAWES: But I mean that really don't mean nothing. They said they'll burn in a different time of the year when they might bury in the ground. I don't think they bury in the ground on Matagorda Island. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: I think that we have pretty much exhausted some of our statements here but I do want the members of the audience to have an opportunity to direct one or two questions and if you would be so kind if you direct them to me then we will allow whoever they are basically directed at to respond or any other response._ Does anyone in the audience have a question at this time? Mr. Boyd. MR. BOYD: I would like to know why the range -- 300 • rI LJ E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 181 if cattle kill everything but this old two-bit Guadalupe Delta we have got down there can't nothing live there. They have got it for lease for cattle to put there but nothing else can live there except mosquitoes. It's for lease right now. The Guadalupe Delta. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Well, the Guadalupe Delta area is leased for cattle and how does this relate to Matagorda Island? MR. HOYD: All right. He just said that cattle don't kill horney toads. And everyone knows that the water on the Guadalupe -- in no instance knows that the water on the Guadalupe Delta I have seen them. I have been on the Delta more than he has. And another thing you won't ever see nowhere except down there. There are prairie chickens down there, too. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: You are basically asking a question about the Guadalupe Delta and how is it okay for cattle grazing there and why is that different from Matagorda Island? Either one of you want to respond to -- it is a little off our -- that the interest being that cattle grazing is okay in one area and perhaps not okay in another area but it is okay in some areas. I think that is probably what you are trying to say. 301 1 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I'm not that familiar 2 with the Guadalupe Delta. I have nothing to do with 3 the management of that area. I think that points out 4 one of the points I have been trying to make. Cattle 5 grazing is okay in some areas and it is not okay in 6 some other areas. I'm also not aware of any data that 7 they have at all about any prairie chickens on the 8 Guadalupe Delta. They are not on any reported surveys 9 at the present time. 10 JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Myrtle Hawes, you 11 indicated that you had a question? 12 MRS. MYRTLE HAWES: I was in Austin yesterday in 13 the General Land Office talking to Spencer Reid just 14 discussing different things about the island and the 15 management plan in particular. And he said that there 16 will be no public around the whooping cranes. 17 And that led me to want to make this statement. 18 The difference in the proposed management plan for the 19 north end and the south end of Matagorda Island would 20 have me believe there are two breeds of whooping 21 cranes. 22 On the north end there will be no development, 23 limited access, the public will be bussed and all 24 obstructions; fences, windmills and so forth will be 25 removed because of the dangers to the whooping cranes. • • I• 3J2 183 • 1 The agencies must anticipate a dumb bird. 2 on the south end plans are for high society 3 entertainment with suburbans, expanded accomodations 4 and no mention of towers being removed. Are the 5 agencies saying the whooping cranes on the south end 6 where there are large concentrations are not distrubed 7 because they can detect who has the money? Smart 8 bird. 9 I am inclined to believe the planners are for two 10 breeds of people and the agencies can detect who has 11 the money and power. And if I might, I would like to 12 direct a question to Mr. Giezentanner. • 13 It appears to me that most of these decisions are 14 yours and yours alone. Would it be possible and I 15 think the word is reused or recused that you could be 16 recused for five years until a study is made to see if 17 another wildlife refuge manager would make the same. 18 proposal or recommendations that you are making to 19 have the cattle removed? 20 MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: If my bosses.agree to 21 transfer me I guess that could be done. And we are 22 fairly well along in the process here and it has 23 undergone appropriate administrative reviews. Up the 24 line one individual did recuse himself from the • 25 process and it was elevated to the Washington level. 303 N 184 I'm not willing to recuse myself. I feel my decision • 2 II is sound. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MRS. MYRTLE HAWES: We would hate to lose you but' we will accept you back. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Some would and some wouldn't. So I think it's a little late in the processes for that. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Are there any other questions? Yes sir. Mr. Hugh Hawes. MR. HUGH HAWES: I used to live on the island when I was young and I want to make one statement. I have never known a wildfire to be started spontaneously let's say by nature over there. And I have on occasion have fought wildfires that were lit for just a small area with no wind and you know what it's like when a little wind springs up and it's gone. And so not so much to do with grazing, I guess you would say, I'm one of these people -- ranchers that against what a lot of ranchers think of I'm against burning and I think when we talk about fire on the island no one can convince me to what I have seen of grassfires over there that there isn't going to be wildlife destroyed by it. And one other note. I'm not a biologist, I'm not a chemist or anything like that but on a couple of 304 • U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • 185 occasions in the last year or so the ones I read and ones I saw in TV that in the burning of wood or grasses that there are seven well-known carcinogens in the smoke from this. So when you are talking about the endangered species and wildlife I think you ought to also take into consideration the human species. In other words, when you have a fire with smoke over there and I mean you get a big grassfire going I wonder how many people it might affect that might even be on the mainland? I have seen smoke coming from the island all the way up to the mainland. So my one thing is be damn careful with fires on the island. I would say no fires at all. I just wanted to make that statement. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Thank you, Mr. Hawes. MR. BRE14T GIEZENTANNER: I would like to state for the record that smoke management is one of our primary concerns. We are very cognizant of the event. We keep in close touch with the air pollution folks around the refuge and they are very concerned as well and they look over our shoulder all the time. So we share Mr. Hawes' concerns in that area up to his last statement where he says no fires. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Okay. There are two last documents. Commissioner Hahn had hoped he would be 305 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 back before we finish. I see that we are just about finished. He asked me to have placed in the record; one, is a memorandum to the Assistant Secretary for Fish & Wildlife and Parks from the Special Assistant to the Secretary, the subject is a Report on Staff Investigation of Matagorda Air Force Range Activities and Potential Impact on Whooping Cranes, including recommendations. This is a document, I don't know if we have a date on this or not but it is signed Andrew H. Sansom. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: That would be the 1973 or 1974 then, Judge. I'm not sure exactly either late 1973 or early 1974. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: I would like to be marked to be put in for Commissioner Hahn. (Exhibit No. 24 (marked for identification. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: And the next document that he asked to be placed in here is a letter to the editor in the Victoria Advocate dated Monday morning, February 5, 1990. Letter by John C. Hawes, Matagorda Takeover Opposed. "Editor, The Advocate: A letter dated October 30, 1989 from the office of Mike Spear, 306 r L J • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 187 Fish & Wildlife Regional Director in Albuquerque to Charles Nash of the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department and the Texas Land Commissioner Garry Mauro, proposes that Matagorda Island be controlled entirely by Fish & Wildlife Service Interior Department. Texas Parks & Wildlife will be told what role they may play in dealing with the public. "In reading about this quote, 'behind the scenes', unquote, deal I notice the name Andrew Sansom as one of engineering this giveaway of some 26,000 acres of state lands to be managed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service as an integral part of the National Wildlife Refuge System. "In checking the records I find that Andrew Sansom, as special assistant to the Secretary of Interior in a 1973 report urged that the Department of Interior proceed with plans to acquire the federal lands on Matagorda Island before the State of Texas did. "Is this the same Andrew Sansom who was working for the Nature Conservancy when it bought the Wynne land on the southern end of Matagorda Island with prior arrangements for Interior to purchase the same 11,500 acres for some $13,600,000 surface only? "Is this the same Andrew Sansom who now under the 307 1 name of Texas Parks & Wildlife is striving to have 2 Matagorda Island placed wholly under the control of 3 the Interior Department? 4 "It makes one wonder who Andrew Sansom works for. 5 It doesn't seem to be Parks & Wildlife or the State or 6 the people of Texas as all citizens who enjoy fishing 7 and hunting and other activities on and around 8 Matagorda Island can suffer the loss of these 9 pleasures. 10 "In the above mentioned Sansom report, Item 9, 11 Page 7 reads: 'Commissioner Bob Armstrong of the 12 General Land Office of Texas reiterated to me that 13 this day his disposal to lease (within his authority) 14 or donate (needs legislative authority) all state 15 surface ownership in the Matagorda Range to Aransas 16 National Wildlife Refuge. This amounts to some 20,000 17 acres of marsh.' Bob Armstrong is now a Parks & 18 Wildlife Commissioner. Very interesting! 19 "Think about it, Texans, and let your Parks & 20 - Wildlife Department, the General Land Office, the 21 governor and your elected senators and 22 representatives, both state and federal, know that you 23 oppose this proposal. John C. Hawes, Port O'Connor." 24 If you will mark this. 25 308 1 (Exhibit No. 25 marked for (identification. • 2 3 4 MR. BRENT GIEZE14TANNER: May I make a couple of 5 statements to clarify some points. To my knowledge 6 and I of course don't know everything that's going on 7 but to my knowledge there are no current proposals on 8 the board or being discussed for anyone to transfer 9 title to any land that they own on Matagorda Island. 10 In other words, the state will retain fee title to the 11 26,000 acres. The federal government will retain 12 title to the 30,502 acres that occur on the island. 13 And earlier some statements were made regarding the • 14 big giveaway of the state lands to the National 15 wildlife Refuge System. I think it needs to be made 16 clear that no titles are being exchanged. 17 The state will continue to own their 26,000 acres 18 and not only does that put those 26,000 acres in the 19 National wildlife Refuge System but it also puts 20 30,502 acres of federal lands into the state natural 21 area system. So it is a mutual exchange of easements 22 but nobody changes title and the state is in a sense 23 gaining access to 30,502 acres of federal lands. 24 The MOA is very clear about what the agencies are 25 bringing to the table with this agreement, And there r -I 309 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ME are some very strict provisions in the MOA that retain each individual agency's rights as a land holder and the rights to put revenues from those lands into their appropriate and respective state or federal accounts. So all of the oil and gas activities that are developed on the state tract monies will go into the school land fund. All of the oil and gas activities that occur on the federal tract do not go to the federal government they go to the previous landowners like the Hawes family and the Wynne families and those royalties go strictly to those landholders because we did not buy the mineral interests on those lands. I just wanted to make that statement for the record to make sure it's clear in everyone's mind. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: But a 100 year easement is about as close to giving it away as you can get. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Not if you read the MOA. Like I say, there are very strict provisions guaranteeing each landowner's -- the federal government states rights as fee title holders to preserve their rights to generate the revenues and things like that. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Well, if it wouldn't be for the whooping crane and the Endangered 310 191 • 1 Species Act the feds would keep their portion and 2 manage it and the state would have their portion and 3 manage it. The feds want the state portion because of 4 the Endangered Species Act and having the entire 5 island as a wildlife refuge and get rid of the cattle, 6 have very limited access by the public despite of what 7 you are saying. 8 MR. BRE'NT GIEZENTANIIER: If the the MOA does not 9 go through any federal and state laws will still 10 apply. The Endangered Species Act will be the same 11 regardless of whether it is in the Nature Wildlife 12 Refuge System. Section 404 on Developments and • 13 Wetlands will still apply regardless of whether it is 14 a refuge or not. Many of those other activities will 15 still go on. Essentially the only thing that does 16 apply is the compatability determination on federal 17 lands. 18 And if you go back and read the MOA the 19 compatability aspect of things does not really apply 20 to the state lands. They have a different standard. 21 They apply to things that are in conflict on state 22 lands but on the federal lands the compatability thing 23 still does apply. So that's the difference. 24 COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: That compatability • 25 authority that the refuge administrator has concerns 311 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 192 me. And it should concern the citizens of Calhoun County and the State of Texas. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Write your Congressman, Stanley. That's all I can tell you. Congress passed the law that says that this is what the law is. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I understand. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Very good. I think that we developed probably a very large body of testimony. One of the things I'm going to ask is that the court reporter's transcript of this be entered into the official court minutes and all tagged documents be entered into official court minutes. I would like to request that the two gentlemen who have been making videotapes of this also give us a copy of their unedited tape so we will have that as a part. I would also like to -- direction from the court to have this proceeding in its entirety forwarded to not only our State Senator and State Representative but our Congressman for their evaluation and any other federally elected officials as would be beneficial to make some determination as to the feasibility of cattle grazing on Matagorda Island or for the purpose of having a study with cattle grazing on Matagorda Island. In that it appears that we have argued for quite sometime now and 312 • • E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 193 we have not gotten a lot further. So that there really does need to be some sort of definitive study to be made and so I would entertain a motion at this time to have these records entered and sent to the respective legislators. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Okay. Are you including in that the governor as well? JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Yes. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: Okay. That would be the governor, the state senator, the representative and the congressman. Okay. I so move. COMMISSIONER SMITH: Second. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: It has been moved and seconded. All in favor say aye. Those opposed same sign. CALHOUN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Aye. COMMISSIONER STANLEY MIKULA: I would just like to comment. I want to thank Dr. Beasom as well as Mr. Giezentanner for being here today. Of course the Hawes people, you know, certainly we want to thank them as well but these two people were somewhat on the firing line, I guess, particularly Mr. Giezentanner. And so I do appreciate all of you being here. I wish that the court could vote to take definitive action on the position but unfortunately we can't. We don't 313 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 194 have that authority. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Will we be able to get a copy of the whole record? JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: Certainly. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I would also like to have copies of the videotapes if possible. We would be happy to pay you for the tapes. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: I will get it in a manner and I will get the copies -- additional copies made and then, you know, whatever the cost of that copy is. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: Would you like to have a copy of the complete appeals record at this point or do you already have it? I don't know what you have or what you don't have. have you given that already to Mr. Hartzog? JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: No. We don't have a complete copy. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: I'm sorry. I didn't hear you. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: I suppose that could be useful to have a complete copy. MR. BRENT GIEZENTANNER: It would take me a little while. It is about that thick (indicating). JUDGE IIOWARD HARTZOG: Is there anything else that we need to cover in this session? Again, let 314 • • • 1 II me -- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 195 MP.. JOE HAWES: Most people don't understand this but the Texas Permit School Funds Land, the General Land Office they leased this land to Texas Parks & Wildlife for $.05 an acre. That comes to $1,244.00 a year that they paid them. It is supposed to be Texas Parks & wildlife pays the General Land Office for the this 25,000 an acre land, a nickel an acre a year. And then, of course, they have an easement exchange with the federal government but most people don't realize that's General Land Office only income on this particular land unless they make an oil lease or something else. And, of course, that amounts to, well, 100 years that would be $5.00 an acre they are getting out of revenue which is really no big boom to all of that land being tied up for 100 years. JUDGE HOWARD HARTZOG: And that reminds me of one other person that we need to include in that list as they did call this office to request a copy of this transcript and that is Attorney General Dan Morales who is at this time indicated he has his best people looking into some of the questions regarding some of the actions taken on Matagorda Island. And his office did call this morning to request a transcript of this and it will be made available to them as well. Is 315 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 there anything else anyone can think of? If not, ladies and gentlemen. Everyone. Thank - you. We are adjourned. I appreciate it. Thank you. --- COMMISSIONERS' COURT ADJOURNED -- 316 • i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 197 HEARING BEFORE THE CALHOUN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT Tuesday, May 21, 1991 I, Y.IRSTEN W. EPPINGER, a Certified Shorthand Reporter in and for the State of Texas, hereby certify pursuant to the Rules and/or agreement of the parties present to the following: That this transcript is a true record of the testimony given at the hearing. .Given under my hand and seal of office on this the .day of July, 1991. ^� jj f w , � � r Busiss Address.: 3.2: PTR.BTEN W. EPPINGBR( CSIt / Certificate No. 1800 Expiration Date: 12-31-91 Y8 North Navarro O. Box 4964 ctoria, Texas 77903 (512) 572-0981 Residence (512) 578-7193 Office (512) 575-8671 Fax 317 A motion was made by Judge Hartzog that this proceeding shall • forwarded to our State Senator, State Representative and our Congressman. The motion was amended by Commissioner Mikula to also include the Governor, along with the State Senator, State Representative and Congressman, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried. ALL EXHIBITS PRESENTED ARE FILED WITH THE COUNTY JUDGE IN HIS OFFICE IN THE COURTHOUSE IN FILE CABINET MARKED "MATAGORDA ISLAND" AND IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC FOR INSPECTION. THE COURT ADJOURNED. • 318 SPECIAL MAY TERM HELD MAY 31, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN X • BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 31st day of May, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to - wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 County Clerk Commissioner Oscar F. Hahn of Precinct No..4 was ill and was not present. whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog led the opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. BIDS AND PROPOSALS - FUEL FOR MONTH OF JUNE The following bids were received for fuel for the month of June and after reviewing said bids a motion was made by Commissioner • Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the low bid of C. L. Thomas be accepted. FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICEIGALLON X APPROXIMATE TOTAL GALLONS/MO, UNLEADED GASOLINE $- .755 X 2800 $ 2114.00_ PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ .855 .X 3000 $ 2565.00 DIESEL FUEL $ .611 X 2500 $ 1527.50 TOTAL BID PRICE $ 6206-90 THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILI. BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING JUNE 1, 1991 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. • SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: DIESEL OIL CO.. INC. ADDRESS 1. Box 71 CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE Port Lavaca. TX President DATE L 11 FUEL BID PROPOSAL • IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $- 7S7 X 2800 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ .g a X 3000 DIESEL FUEL $ X 2500 TOTAL BID PRICE $� THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING JUNE 1, 1991 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: (�' ✓ ""� ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE 'I P 7: 71 �J 320 UTILITY EASEMENT -LA WARD TELEPHONE EXCHANGE-PCT. 3 • Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that La Ward Telephone Exchange, Inc. be allowed to bury telephone cable within the right of way of County Road #314 LA WARD TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC. BOX 246 LA WARD, TEXAS 77970 (512) 872-2211 Commissioners Court Calhoun County Pt. T-avaca;Texas 77979 Dear Commissioners Court! May 14,1991 Formal notice is hereby given that the T.a Ward Telephone • Exchange requests permission to place a buried communication "line within the right of way of County Road # 114 in Calhoun County. The proposed cable is to he bored under the county road at a depth of In,, below the bottom of the ditch. The location and description of the proposed line and appurtenances are more fully shown in the drawing, attached to this notice. Yours Truly, • Larry Green President La Ward Telephone exchange, Inc. gh/lg 321 Z. 4-21. 4 NumeRoug e ... Uf I2.22 SN A2EF W F 56=22 gJFiZ-2Y. F Pi L E-S I Ct PIPELINE EASEMENT-FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP.- PCT. 3 Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that Formosa Plastics Corp. be allowed to install multiple pipelines across the Calhoun County road and drainage ditch near the Calhoun County Navigation District in Pct. 3 as • follows: • • �f FORMOSA 1.aLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS P. O. BOX 700 201 FORMOSA DRIVE POINT COMFORT, TEXAS 77978 Ms. Helen Smith Commissioner, Precinct 3 Calhoun County Court House Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Ms. Smith, PHONE: 512/987-7000 FAX: 512/987-2721 May 15, 1991 Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests your authorization to install multiple pipelines across the Calhoun County road and drainage ditch near the Calhoun County Navigation District as shown on the attached Area Mao OFPL-D000 and in the manner as shown on Drawing No. OFPP-D025. Additional design data and information is provided on the attached Offsite Pipelines Design Data Sheet. Construction of the project is scheduled to begin July 15, 1991. Formosa Plastics proposes to install the pipelines across the road and adjacent ditch by open cut of the roadway while providing suitable temporary roadway to provide access to and from the port facility. Installation of the lines, including restoration of the roadway, is currently estimated to require approximately ten days, depending on work schedules. Boring of the roadway and ditch is not practical and may not be successful due to the tight working conditions and the large number of lines to be installed. The nature of the piping configuration requires precision alignment and dimensional control not normally inherent in bored crossings of this nature and complexity. If you have any questions or require additional information please contact: JOE FABRI'GEL FORMOSA. PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS P.O. BOY, 700 POINT COMFORT, TEXAS 77978 PHONE (512) 987-7624 Your prompt approval of the proposed construction will be appreciated. Sincerely, Jac wu�r) Y,C: Simon Chang 303 w iV �����IIY\11YY1WYY1\Yr•�\m���sa.� ... ����V_�—�����-avr � ��I�IL'11i���©� aim �����������[��'1.F=iIl.43f f'Z'I.T. �•�Zf���_�___�V� �/��f�+ its i abnw�— A v c .. c c c �/ A WAN O —_ —_ �A�117TI!f1�•� • FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION FPG - TEXAS EXPANSION PROJECT OFFSITE PIPELINE DESIGN DATA SHEET ROAD CROSSING OF CALHOUN COUNTY ROAD Amn rrNn PRnVVRTV Una No. Nominal Pipe Size x Wall Thk.. Pipe Speddcation Op. Press. (pslg) Op. Temp. (deg. F) Des. Press. (pslg) Des. Temp. (deg. F) Percent SWS at Op. Press. Percent SMYS at Des. Press PFO-0-004-12' Pyrolysis Fuel Oil 12' x 0.250' API-51- Gr. B too 104 270 150 7.29% 19.67% FGH-0-007A-2' Fuel Gas 2' x 0.218' API-61- Gr. B 350 104 600 160 6.46% 7.78% NAP-0-012-24' Naphtha 24' x 0.375' API-51. Or. X42 100 80 270 150 7.62% 20.57% N2-"I"' Nitrogen 8' x 0.250' API-61- Gr. B 100 104 270 150 4.93% 13.31% CSH-0-019-10' Caustic Soda 10' x 0.250' API.61- Gr. B 1 100 150 1 260 200 6.14% 15.97% CON-0-028-24' Condensate 24' x 0.376" API-51. Gr. X421 100 104 270 160 7.62% 20.67% CAIW"29-8' Butane Mix 6'x0.260' API.61- Gr.B 1 100 f04 270 150 4.93% 13.31% PGO-0.030.8- Pyrolysis Gasoline 8' x 0.250' API-61- Gr. B 100 104 270 150 4.93% 13.31% WHO-0-031-8' Wash Oil 8- x o.260- API-61- Gr. B 100 104 270 160 4.93% 13.31% ISB-0-032-10' Isobutane 10' x 0.250' API-51- Gr. B 100 104 270 160 6.14% 16.59% WWT-0-033-4- Waste Water - Storm 4"x0.237' API-6L Gr.B 100 104 270 150 2.71% 7.327. NBT-0-034-8' Normal Butane 8' x 0.250' API-61- Or. B 180 104 270 160 8.97Y. 13.31% EDC-0-035-20- Ethylene Dichlorlde 20' x 0.376' API-61- Gr. B 100 104 270 150 7.62% 20.67% MEG.0-036.14' Monoeth lene Glycol 14' x 0.312' A-312 TP NM 250 118 270 150 28.04% 30.29% Al-"37-4' Instrument Air 4' x 0.237' API-61- Gr. B 110 104 270 150 2.98% 7.32Y. NFOA-03e-8' Natural Fuel Oil 8' x 0.250' API-61- Gr. B 100 104 270 150 4.93% 13.31% WI-0-065.4' Industrial Water 4' x 0,2371 API.61- Gr. 8 60 104 270 150 1.63% 7.32% SPR-0-052-8- Spans 8' x 0.250' API-61. Gr. B too 104 270 150 4.93% 13.31% SPR-0-053-8' Spare 8' x 0.250' API.6L Gr. B 100 104 270 160 4.93Y. 13.31% Design Codes: CFR Tide 49, Part 192,'Ransporlatlon of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards' CFR Tide 49, Part 195,'Transportation of Hrizerdous Uquids by Pipeline' ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31.6,'Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems' ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31.4,'Uquld Petroleum Transportation Piping Systems' • API Standard 1104,'Welding of Plpelines and Related Fadlldes' Pipe Coating: Extruded Polyethylene over Butyl Mastic (X-Tru Coat) Hydrotest: 1.5 times design pressure for a minimum a hours. Cathodic Ptotection: Rectifier Impressed CurtenL All lines electrically Isolated from other structures. • 325 BIDS 6 PROPOSALS -INSURANCE Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that the County Auditor be authorized to take proposals for various insurance as follows: Texas Commercial Package, Contractors Equipment Floater, Fleet Policy and Boiler and Machinery Policy. GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL TOURISM ADVISORY COMMITTEE - NOMINATION Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that Lorraine Fabrygel be nominated as a member to the Golden Crescent Regional Tourism Advisory Committe. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REDISTRICTING -APPOINTMENTS Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that upon the recommendation of the Commissioners and County Judge, the following persons be appointed to the Citizens Advisory Committee on Redistricting: Don Lenertz, Roger Galvan, Ernest Kabela, Lupe Gutierrez,Sr. Mrs. Laura Jo Phillips, Mrs. Betsy Wilson, Calvin Ragusin, Rayburn Haynie, Jack Wu, Mrs. Lewis Ray Madden, Louis Butler and Elvira Martinez. RESOLUTION- OPPOSING UB 1007-OVERWEIGHT LOADS Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Miklula and carried that the following Resolution be passed: R E S O L U T I O N . WHEREAS, HB2060 passed by the Texas Legislature in 1989 required the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation to issue permits for overweight trucks to travel on both State and County roads; and WHEREAS, under HB2060, the permits allowed maximum gross weights of 84,000 pounds; and WHEREAS, many County roads.are designed, constructed and load zoned for maximum gross weights of less than 58,420 pounds; and WHEREAS, these additional overweight loads will contribute to a rapid deterioration of existing county roads; and WHEREAS, HB1007 passed by the Texas Legislature in 1991 further limits county authority to restrict the use of local roads by superheavy vehicles; and WHEREAS, it is estimated that construction costs incurred by counties to upgrade and maintain existing and new County roads to accomodate FIB1007 would double to approxi- mately $125,000.00 per mile; NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned Calhoun County Commis- sioners'.Court, hereby petition The Honorable Ann Richards, Governor of the State of Texas, in order to help save and protect our existing county road system and help alleviate a potentially tremendous financial burden on the Counties of the State of Texas, TO VETO 11111007. COMMISSIONERS' CQUo OF Leroy e , omm.Fct-1 J He en J M , Comm.Pct. ATTEST: : county clerk , TEXAS Oscar Ha n, Comm.Pc . is E ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY Claims totaling $438,052.99 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL • Claims totaling $423,661.92 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula, and carried that said claims be approved for payment. • • THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL JUNE TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I HELD JUNE 5, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 5th day of June, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Opal M. Hayes County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 Deputy County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog led the opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. RESOLUTION - SARGENT BEACH Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following Resolution be pass: 327 r� R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, it has been determined that approximately twenty percent (20%) of Texas' gross State product is attributable to the operations conducted on or adjacent to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) as is evidenced by the documented annual direct impacts of over $3 billion, indirect impacts of over $37 billion and the employment of over 147,000 individuals in this State; and WHEREAS, the presence of the Intracoastal Waterway in Texas is responsible for the production of the majority of petrochemicals in the United States which are crucial for fully maintaining domestic industrial output, and in addition, the shipment of vast quantities of these products to foreign markets produces a positive influence on the Nation's balance of trade; and WHEREAS, the physical protection of invaluable wetlands and other irreplaceable habitat for fish and wildlife is an invaluable service provided by the Sargent • Beach barrier, located between the Gulf of Mexico and the Intracoastal Canal in Matagorda County; and WHEREAS, two stretches of beach at Sargent Beach, Texas, one of 4,500 feet and another of 3,500 feet, are eroding at rates up to sixty seven (67) feet per year and threaten to encroach into the waterway in the forseeable future with the alarming potential to severely hamper or cease the flow of goods on the wasterway in both East and West directions past Sargent Beach; and WHEREAS, tropical storms and hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico pose the potential to massively accelerate the erosion and mate the Gulf of Mexico and the GIWW at Sargent Beach, causing immediate and long term disruptions to barge traffic along the waterway in Texas, thus devasting the economics of both the State of Texas and the Nation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, hereby declares the erosion problem affecting the two stretches of beach at Sargent Beach, Matagorda County, Texas, an EMERGENCY, requiring immediate attention, and urges a speedy and effective resolution to these problems which are posing a threat to the Intracoastal Waterway; and this Commis- sioners Court further requests the United States Congress 11 328 • • • and the State of Texas to promptly direct these urgently needed remedies. COMMISSIONERS COURT F CALHOUN POUNTY, TEXAS By oun y AUd4e I Comtnissibnd'r, Pct. No. 1 By \ Coommr is ner,Pct. No. ATTEST: `Marlene Paul, County Clerk BY putt' Opal: D4.: ha es REDISTRICTING The Court met with Guinn & Morrison, Attorneys at Law, retained to redistrict County Commissioners, Justices of the Peace and Constables' Precincts and Voting Precinct Boundaries, and met with the Citizen's Advisory Committee on Redistricting. A short workshop was held. No actions was taken by the Court. THE COURT ADJOURNED. r.. 399 REGULAR JUNE TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS [ COUNTY OF CALHOUN T HELD JUNE 10, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the loth day of June, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to - wit: 3 Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner„ Pet. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner,, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F..Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: The Rev. Douglas E. Thomas, Pastor of Grace Episcopal church gave the invocation. :Judge Hartzog led the pledge of allegiance. BIDS AND PROPOSALS- LIBRARY -COPIER The following bids were opened by the County Auditor and he was requested by the Judge to confer with the county Librarian and give the Court.a report Friday, June 14th. GENERAL OFFICE ata VA) 402 W. Rhapsody San Antonio, Tenes 78216 Reprographics Inc. June 3, 1991 A Bid For B. 11. COMISKEY, JR. C.P.A. COUNTY AUDITOR CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 MAKE 6 MODEL OF COPIER OFFERED: Sharp�SF-7850 BID PRICE OF COPIER:-$2,795.00 BID PRICE OF MAINTENANCE CONTRACT: SEE ATTACHMENT DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE CONTRACT: SEE ATTACHMENT NAME: DATA REPROGRAPHICS, INC. ADDRESS: 903 Sam Houston Suite B CITY, STATE, ZIP: Victoria, Texas 77901 PHONE NUMBER: (512) 573-3834 or 576-4119 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:_pt(¢� TITLE: Service Manager and Equipment Consultant • • • 33fl • SPECIFICATIONS FOR COPIER FOR CALHOUN COUNTY LIBRARY The copier will need to perform the following functions or meet the following criteria: HIGH QUALITY COPIES ABILITY TO COPY FROM BOOKS ENLARGE AND REDUCE TWO PAPER CASSETTES (8 1/2 x 11 & 8 1/2 x 14j SINGLE SHEET FEEDER STATIONARY EXPOSURE GLASS & PLATEN COVER The approximate number of copies per month is estimated at 200-300 copies. Please include literature on the model of copier you are submitting a bid on, detailing the copier's features. • We would like a separate bid on a maintenance contract for the copier you are submitting a bid on. For information only, would you Vlease furnish current prices for toner & dry ink cartridges. These items are not out for bid nor will any bidder be awarded a contract based on the cost of these supplies. MAKE & MODEL OF COPIER OFFERED: Sharp SF-7370 Copier BID PRICE OF COPIER: $ 1,895.00 BID PRICE OF MAINTENANCE CONTRACT: $ 300.00 per year DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE CONTRACT: All parts, labor, service calls, mileage, Drums, Lamps & Rollers. Paper Not Included. NAME: Ken's Copiers & Fax Center ADDRESS: 205 North Star, Suite P CITY, STATE;'ZIP: Victoria • PHONE NUMBER: 512-572-8575 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: Owner Optional Accessories - Stack Feed Bypass $200.00 Matching Cabinet - $125.00 331 VICTORIA OFFICE EQUIPMENT, INC. SALES 703 NORTH MAIN SERVICE POST OFFICE BOX 1877 RENTALS VICTORIA, TEXAS 77901 June 6, 1991 Calhoun County Library 200 Mahan Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Attention: Calhoun County Commissioners and Kathy Nixie, Librarian COPIER SYSTEMS PROPOSAL EQUIPMENT PROPOSED: Toshiba B D-5120 Plain Paper Copier Toshiba Copier Stand Total Cost of Toshiba Copying System Installation and Set-up Charges Total Cost of Toshiba Copying System *Pricing is based on GSA for state, county, and local government agencies. EQUIPMENT OPTIONS: Toshiba MR-4 Automatic Document Feeder Toshiba 10-bin Sorter Toshiba 20-bin Sorter Toshiba 25-bin Sorter 1,000 Sheet Large Capacity Feeder 1,500 Sheet Large Capacity Feeder TOSHIBA BD-5120 COPIER FEATURES: --Edge-to-Edge Copying --Stationary Platen. -20 Copies Per Minute --65$ - 154% Enlargement and Reduction in presets or 1% increments. --Automatic Book Copying Feature SUPPLIES FURNITURE MACHINES $2,260.00 + 118.00 $2,378 .00 + 50.00 2,42 8 .00 $ 842.50 $ 563.00 $ 670.00 $1,705 .00 . 11 --3-way Paper Supply --20 Sheet Stack bypass --Pulse Motors --Clamshell Design --4" x 5" to 11" x 17" paper size copying capability. • is • 332 OFFICE SPACE -COURTHOUSE ANNEX - REGION III E -Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the county enter an agreement with Region III Education Service Center for office space in the Courthouse Annex for a period of one year, and authorize the County Judge to exeucte the contract. A G R E E M E N T BETWEEN REGION III EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER, VICTORIA, TEXAS AND CALHOUN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, PORT LAVACA, TEXAS Calhoun County will provide to Region III Education Service Center, Victoria, Texas, the use of Room 3 in the Calhoun County Courthouse Annex on Austin Street in Port Lavaca, Texas, for the computer assisted instruction project and related activities. Region III Education Service Center will pax the County $250.00 per month for the project 's proportionate costs of building space, utilities, telephone and janitorial services. TERM: From July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, subject to continuation of funding and related actions of the Golden Crescent • Private Industry Council. This agreement is automatically renewable from year to year unless either party shall give to the other party written notice of at least 30 days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED: Region III Education Service Center By Executive Director Date: APPROVED: Calhoun Co4Aty Commis - Slone By r Y� CoOntT JudgjV v 117 Date EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE- COMMITTEE PRESENTATION • Commissioner Mikula reported for he and Commissioner Hahn had met with City of Port Lavaca members . He stated it was the consensus of the committee that the E.M.S should be a department of the county. Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Courtapprove the EMS Special Committee Report as submitted, which recommends that E.M.S be a department of Calhoun County effective January 1, 1992 provided that the City of Port Lavaca is in agreement. 333 EMS Special Committee Report Meeting Date: May 30, 1991 Committee Members: City: Mayor Tiney Browning, Rick Nichols County: Oscar Hahn, Stanley Mikula Others Present: John Hayes, Saad Mikhail, H.J.Barber, C.J.Webstez The consensus of the committee was that effective January 1, 1992 Calhoun County EMS which is currently a department of Memorial Medical Center, become a Department of Calhoun County. The committee request that the revised 1991 budget listed below be approved. The committee in addition request that the proposed 1992 budget also listed below be considered and adopted through the budgetary process. 1991 Budget revised The committee recommends that the revised 1991 budget be funded in the following manner. Revised Budget $417,475 Sinking Fund 63,750 $353,725 Balance $353,725 City 141,500 ($133,000) County 212,225 ($200,000) Balance 0 The city will need to increase their budget $8,500 and the County will need to increase their budget $12,225 for 1991. The city has agreed to waive the 1985 rent of $4,800. 1992 Proposed Budget The committee recommends that the proposed 1992 budget be funded in the following manner. Proposed Budget $518,086 Sinking Fund 70,000 $448,086 Balance City County Balance $448,086 197,158 (44%) 250,928 (56%) The proposed budget will reflect one additional Paramedic and one EMT\Clerk. The Paramedic will fill out the existing shift that runs with only two medics and the EMT\Clerk will be responsible for the complete billing and collections along with responding as needed during normal working hours. With the EMT\Clerk position doing the billing and collections, the 15% of the billing and collections currently being performed by the hospital will be placed in the sinking fund. The hospital is currently paid approximately $18,000 per year for billing and collecting. TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT The Tax Assessor -Collector presented after reading and verifying same, a Smith,aseconded by Commissioner Hah be approved . COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT n her monthly report for April,and motion was made by Commissioner and carried that said report The County Treasurer presented her monthly report reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried, report be approved. 334 and after Commissioner that said 0 LI • THE COURT RECESSED FOR THE GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY AT MEMORIAL • MEDICAL CENTER The Court met at the Memorial Medical Center for Groundbreaking ceremonies. Judge Howard G. Hartzog opened the ceremonies by welcoming everyone present. Father Raul Salas of Our Lady of the Gulf Catholic Church gave the Invocation. Judge Hartzog gave a history of the hospital from its beginning in 1949. Special guests invited to participate in the groundbreaking ceremonies were: David (Dinks) Boyd, Mrs John (Faye.) Sterling, Mrs. S. W. (Isabel) Lester. Others participating were Board Members Jack Wu, Alex Hernandez, Ervin Hermes, Jewel Fisher, Betsy Wilson, Rolando Reyes, R. E. Clegg, Dr. Tim Mc Farland, along with Rosemary Bradley, John Hayes, Acree Carlisle and Murray Sisson (Page Southerland Page), a representative from Don Krueger Construction Co., along with Commissioners Leroy Belk, Pct. One, Stanley Mikula, Pct. Two, Helen J. Smith, Pct. 3, and Oscar F. Hahn, Pct. 4. THE COURT RE -CONVENED AT 1:30 P.M. AT THE • BALLOT TABULATING EQUIPMENT The Court heard proposals from Business Records and Hart Forms and services for tabulating equipment. It was decided to allow Business Records to give a demonstration of their machine the 14th of June. No action was taken . • 335 BUDGET AMENDMENTS- EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT,CAPITOL PROJECT FUND -LIBRARY Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried, that the following Budget Amendments be approved. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST 11 To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Emergency Management (Department making this request) Date: June 4, 1991 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL_Account-#_ FOMOLIFON J i4 i r.� Amendment J61 :1 i i u .h. . ,n u I� 1' 1*1 Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: L Date postqd to General Ledger account(s): - -Reason Pay time usage on last years contract used by GBRA and to be reimbursed to Calhoun County JUN until �J • • 336 BUDGET ADJUSTNSNT• REQUEST , To: Calhoun County Auditor • From: /LS q C-t jtlM — I1Q/u.�. (Depar6ent making this request) Date: 1 _q I request an adjustment to the current budget for my department. The following transfers result in a hpn Mo e tal budget for expendituresby category (inetuapofrVtt, otal outlay). GL Account # (�d- col-7�do Account Name Amendment Amount Reason bbluL • Net change in total budget for this department is: S ___p___ Other remarks/justification: I understand that th;� �., ,.,.. L_ --'- ---�,----'- Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 337 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY Claims totaling $281,995.11 and one claim to R. J. Sheppard & Assoc. for $4,962.36 were presented for payment. After reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the claims for $281,995.11 be approved for payment and that the payment to R. J. Sheppard & Assoc. be held subject to the approval of Commissioner Hahn. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL Claims totaling $2,596.94 were presented for payment and after • reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. THE COURT RECESSED. REGULAR JUNE TERM HELD JUNE 14, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS [ COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 14th day of June, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the courthouse in the City of Port • Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, anbd there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 -ABSENT Marlene Paul County Clerk Judge Hartzog gave the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. BIDS AND PROPOSALS- LIBRARY - COPIER A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried, that the recommendation of Librarian Kathy Nixie for a copier be accepted and that Victoria Office Equipment's bid for the Toshiba in amount of $2428.00 be accepted. Ms. Nixie also gave a report on the children's summer program and the Adult Literacy program being conducted by the Pilot Club. BALLOT TABULATING EQUIPMENT The Court heard proposals. from Business Records,Inc. and Hart Forms • and services after seeing demonstrations of their machines by both companies. It was decided to table this until June 24, 1991. 14 0 338 RESOLUTION -ADOPTING A BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the current Building Fee Schedule , which was adopted May 13, 1974, and replace in total with the new fee schedule as of July 1, 1991. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS the Commissioyers Court of Calhoun County, Texas, has on the day of �Yrt_, 19 Tj__, enacted an order, hereinafter referred o as Order, providing, inter alia, for building permits to be issued by the County Building Official; and WHEREAS, Article 4, Section E (4)(d) of said Order provides for the promulgation by resolution by this Commissioners Court of the schedule of fees to be charged by the office of the Building Official for the issuance of a building permit; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas: SECTION A. All applications for permit shall be accompanied by a fee of $15.00 • for processing and mailing where necessary. SECTION B. The following schedule of fees for the issuance of building permits is hereby adopted: (1) For minor repairs, as defined in said Order (less than $1,000), no fee shall be required. (2) For all repairs,improvements, alterations, and construction, the value of which exceeds the definition of minor repairs, as contained in the above described Order (more than $1,000), the fee shall be $25.00 regardless of the zone. (3) For the moving of any building or structure (excluding the removal of such buildings and structures from the county, and further excluding from the consideration hereof temporary buildings) the fee shall be $25.00. (4) For the installation, placing or moving a manufactured home, modular home, travel trailer (RV) or portable building (larger than 8' x 24'), into or within the county, (excluding removal from the county), the fee shall be $25.00. • (5) Commercial and industrial permits may be purchased from the office of the Building Official upon.the payment of $250.00. Refer to Article 4, Section E of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance for violations and penalties. 339 SECTION D. The foregoing schedule of fees shall be in effect from and after the date hereof, and shall continue in effect until amended by subsequent resolution of this Commissioners Court. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the AY day of 19 cTl i ;, ATTEST: -� k-C.G', ' 2/ Calhoun County Clerk p Jti;i COMMISSIONERS COURT OF C H COUNTY • Cal Co nt J dge • WEST SIDE NAVIGATION DISTRICT - ANNUAL REPORT • Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the annual report of West Side Navigation District be accepted as submitted , with appreciation of the presentation and thanks to the commissioners for the job they've been doing. CALHOUN COUNTY YOUTH COORDINATOR Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that on the recommendation of Darrell Dramgoole, county extension agent, and a committee headed by Fred Knipling, that Denise Kay Green be employed as Youth Coordinator beginning June 24, 1991. 340 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Claims totaling $194,513.25 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims • be approved for payment. THE COURT ADJOURNED. REGULAR JUNE TERM HELD JUNE 24, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS 1 I COUNTY OF CALHOUN j BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 24th day of June, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M. a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: • Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: County Judge Hartzog gave the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. BALLOT TABULATING EQUIPMENT Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried to purchase the AIS Hart 115 Optical Scan Tabulating at the price of $28,250.00 payable January , 1992, with no interest, as per the proposal of June 19, 1991 and that the County Judge be authorized to execute the necessary instruments. Delivery to be around July 15, 1991. Commissioner Hahn abstained from the voting as he was not present for the demonstration. BIDS & PROPOSALS- FUEL FOR MONTH OF JULY The following bids were received for fuel for the month of July and after reviewing said bide a motion was made by Commissioner • Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the only bid of Diebel Oil Co. be accepted. 341 0 FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ .951 X 2800 = $ 2662.80 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ 1.021 X 3000 = $ 3063.00 DIESEL FUEL $ .581 X 2500 = $ 1452.50 TOTAL BID PRICE $ 7178.30 THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE.MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING JULY AND ENDING JULY 31, 1991. 1, 1991 CONTRACT PERIOD. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE SELLER WILL SUBMIT • SEPARATE INVOICES ON .EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE DIEBEL OIL COMPAUY, INC. Port Lavaca TX 17979 552-3224 President June 24, 1991 E 342 BIDS AND PROPOSALS - ASPHALT The following bid was received for asphalt, oil & Emulsion for the period of July 1, 1991 to September 30, 1991, and after reviewing said bid , a motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried to accept the only bid of Texas Fuel & Asphalt Co., Inc. SPECIFICATIONS AND PROPOSAL FOR ASPHALTS, OILS, A EMULSIONS ,FOR CALHOUN COUNTY CAI,IIOUN COIINTI RILL 0.RCfi1VF. BIOS ON ASPIIALTS, OILS, A EMULSIONS, ALL MATERIAL MUST MEET TEXAS ETATE/1/1111111 OF/11111111 AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS. THIS FORK IS DESIGNED TO BE USED B1 ALI, BIDDERS, PLIASE CONPLRTE ALL SECTIONS THAT IOU RISE TO 810 ON AND DISREGARD THE REST. THE PRICE PER CALLON FOR MATERIAL SHOULD NOT BE CONTINGENT ON CALHOUN COUNTY ACCEPTING TRANSPORTATION QUOTATION, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE COMPUTATIONS FOR TOTAI, BID PRICE BE COMPLETED AS FOLLOWS: FOB SHIPPING POINT: TOTAL BID PRICE - UNIT PRICE PER CALLON X GALLONS PER DESTINATION FOB DESTINATION: TOTAL BID PRICE _ IFIRIGHT CHARGE I UNIT PRICE PER GALLON (FOR MATERIAL ONLII) A GALLONS PER DESTINATION DO NOT INCLUDE FREIGHT CHARGES KITH UNIT PRICE PER GALLON, THESE CHARGES MUST BE BID SEPARATELY, THE PERIOD OF 1111S CONTRACT MILL 06 JULY I, 1991 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1991. DELIVERY PERIOD: WITHIN I DAYS AFTER PLACEMENT OF GRDEA, ITEN 300, ASPHALTS, OILS, EMULSIONS: (RC 301 FOB SHIPPING POINT ............................. ........ I.............................. FOB DESTINATION GALLOPS PER DESTINATION ....................... UNIT PRICE TOTAL FREIGHT ' UNIT PRICE TOTAL PER GALLON DID PRICE CHARGE PER GALLON BID PHI Per Cal. BY TRIICI: • 1,250 CAL1,0115 250 GALLONS TO PORT LAVACA STOCKPILE. TO SIX MILE 1. 69/gal. " 69)gal. 1.862.50_ 122/�8al. I _91/gal 11,137_50 1,000 GALLONS STOCKPILE TO OLIVIA STOCKPILE I. 1.172.50 {1.08/,8e1. h_771ga1. 1__442.50 ( _69)gel. (_690.00_ (_ .28/gal. 1 .97 gal. ( 970_00 0 GALLONS TO PORT O'CONNOR STOCKPILE I__0____ 1___ 0 1_ 1_ 0� {_ 0 1,500 GALLONS TO SEADRIFT STOCKPILE (_ 69)gal. (1035.00_ _0_ 1`26T, . ( .95 R81. 11,425.5.00 [TER JOB, ASPHALTS, OILS, EMULSIONS: (RC 250) ................................................................................................... FOB SHIPPING POINT ............ I ................ ,...................................... FOB OBSTINATION GALLONS PER DESTINATION UNIT PRICE TOTAL FREIGHT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PER GALLON BID PRICE CHARGE PER GALLON BID FRI Per Gal. BY TRUCK: '- 6,250 GALLONS TO PORT LAVACA STOCKPILE { ,G9/gal. 1.4,312,50 1_0527/g_a14.7427' ai11_M41.88 1 7,500 GALLONS TO SIX MILE STOC.APIL6 1. 69)gal. I.5,17.5_,60 I_052 .7427 ga1.1_5,570,25 6,250 GALLONS 10 OLIVIA STOCKPILE 1. 69)01. 14,312.50 1 .0546/9al4 7446/pe1.1 4161571. 75 0 GALLONS TO PORT O'CONNOR STOCKPILE 10__ 10 .1___ 0_ 1 0 I S,000 GALLONS TO 56AD0.IFT STOCKPILE (_ 69]gsl. 110,35000 _ 1.05 pal. 1.74 Z al. 1111.100.00 "Freight rates for RC-250 are based on 40,000♦1 minimum loads. DATE: June 19, 1991 NAME OF BIDDER: 1 Texas Fuel 8 Asphalt Co., Inc. ______________ RAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 9605 - CITY, STATE, SIP CODE:__ Corpus Christi, Texas 784G9 TELEPHONE AUTHORIZED 343 REPORT OF ENGINEERS -BOAT RAMP -PORT ALTO The report of Ralph Wall of G.6 W.Engineers was postponed until July 11, 1991. PORT O'CONNOR FIRE STATION -ADDITION Commissioner Hahn informed the Court the Mud district was interested in putting an addition on the Port O'Connor Fire Station, for their use and the fire station. This was tabled until an agreement could be drawn up. SEADRIFT LIBRARY - ADDITION Commissioner Hahn informed the court the Friends.of Library had talked to him about an addition of 26'X the Seadrift 50' to the • library at approximately $40,000.00. The Court will hear more on this at the budget workshop for the 1992 budget in July. RESOLUTION -EXPANSION OF U.S. 87 AND EXTENSION OF FM 1090 Commissioner Mikula asked that if the Resolution be approved the Court be allowed to provide some input into the design, route and drainage improvements that would be forthcoming as a result of the project. MOTION by Commissioner Mikula to approve the Resolution supporting the expansion of US 87 and extension of FM 1090 be approved subject to the approval and committment of both projects by the .Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation; otherwise this Resolution will be declared null and void and the Calhoun County financial committment will automatically be withdrawn, seconded by Commissioner Belk, and carried. RESOLUTION ADDRESSING THE EXTENSION OF FM 1090 THE EXPANSION OF US HWY 87 WHEREAS, there has existed for many years a need for a • better and safer highway system connecting Port Lavaca and Victoria to provide for the transport of the citizens of Calhoun and Victoria Counties; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner's Courts of Calhoun and Victoria Counties desire to assure a common, coordinated effort to promote meaningful economic development within Calhoun and Victoria Counties; and WHEREAS, in order to provide Calhoun and Victoria County residents with viable evacuation routes during emergencies; and WHEREAS, the retention of present day jobs and the creation of new jobs and investment in these counties will benefit the STATE OF TEXAS as well, provide needed opportunity for upward mobility of all its citizens, strengthen the real estate market and generate new tax revenue to.support state and local services; and WHEREAS,'the continued economic development within these counties, along Victoria's Barge Canal, Calhoun's coastal area, and other sites in both counties, including the Formosa Plastics Group's construction of a $1.32 Billion Ethylene Production Facility at Point Comfort, will continue to add volume to the traffic moving daily between Calhoun and Victoria Counties; and WHEREAS, to assure a common, coordinated effort to promote • meaningful economic development and diversification within Calhoun and Victoria Counties; and WHEREAS, the extension of FM Hwy. 1090 into Victoria County to intersect with United States Highway 87 south of Placedo, Texas will provide: (1) An additional hurricane and emergency evacuation route for the citizens of Victoria and Calhoun counties; (2) Mutual economic benefit to both Victoria and Calhoun Counties through the expansion of commerce; (3) The facilitation of growth and the enhancement of the Calhoun -Victoria Foreign Trade Zone; (4) An additional highway to serve the needs of traffic going through both Calhoun and Victoria Counties for business and recreational purposes along the Texas Gulf coast; and NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Calhoun County Commissioners' Court does hereby join with the Victoria County Commissioners' Court in requesting the Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation • (1) To extend FM 1090 into Victoria County to intersect with United States Highway 87 south of Placedo, Texas. (2) To expand US Hwy 87 between Victoria and Port Lavaca to a 4-Lane divided highway AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Calhoun County Commissioners' Court does hereby commit to contributing $1.5 million to this project to be funded over the next 7 years and to be paid to the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation at the point that Department enters right of way acquisition phase of US Highway 87. expansion. PASSED AND APPROVED on this Z24 day o9W4-1 1991 CC UP jai UE ATTEST: Malene Paul, County Clerk • 345 MATAGORDA ISLAND - HAWES CATTLE CO. Judge Hartzog asked the minutes to reflect"what a,sad day this really is and that in one sense a tradition, a history, a way of life for the past 150 years has passed. The cattle have been • removed from Matagorda Island and the Hawes Cattle Co. on Matagorda Island is no more because the Fish and Wildlife service have de- termined that an occupation which has been conducted for the past 150 years, an occupation which throughout our history we've re- vered in numerous westerns where we have Irish cowboys, German cowboys, black cowboys, Mexican cowboys and now suddenly cattle grazing is no longer compatible on Matagorda Island. It is truly a sad day. " Judge Hartzog asked the Court to consult with our attorney to concerning pushing forth our Disclaimer and Reservation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the minutes of the May 13th and May 17th,1991 be approved. 4�L� r 3 O cc)aar F. Hahn' ,Cbissioner, Pct.4 Marlene Paul, County Clerk - BUDGET AMENDMENT- SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT -AMBULANCE SERVICE -PORT O'CONNOR • Motion by Commissioner Hahn,seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following Budget Amendments be approved. C J 346 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST • lo: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Date: Calhoun Co. Sheriff's Department a (Department making this request) June 17, 1991 I request an amendment to the ___1991 --- budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account M Account Name Amount Reason YYM1 YY11M1Y1 M1YYYIM1M1M1YlYYM1YRYYY Y111YYYY'Yry1ryry ryryryYlryryryryryryryryryryryryryry 01-45-10-4920 Jail Group Insurance - 200.00 01-45-10-6930 _Jail Physicals + 200.00 Account overdrawn 01-45-40-4920 S. 0. Group Insurance - 5,000.00 01-45-40-6522 Auto Reapirs + 5,000.00 Account Overdrawn 01-45-40-4920 S. 0. Group Insurance - 1,000.00 • 01-45-40-5220 Auto parts & supplies + 1,000.00 Account overdrawn 01-45-40-4920 S. 0. Group Insurance - 2,000.00 01-45-40-6420 S. 0. Training + 2,000.00 Account overdrawn Net change in total budget for PO W O V this department iss $ _O_ /tJUN]R] vavamammvo®om 2 41991 Other remarks/justification: • Above listed budget line items are overdrawn 1 understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department heads /J Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 347 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioner '_"C��ou,(r�t r From: W wcp--VAJt*, — �ti l+ ( )' tMM (Department making this request) Date: �, I _qI I request an amendment to the / q/ budget for the year following line items in my department: GL- Account _#------- 01-K50°I-�5bo Amendment Account Name Amount Reason Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained.. p� Signature of official/department head: lJ�nl L4� �l Date of Commissioners' Court approvals 1�1e Cam\ Date posted to General Ledger account(s): ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY Claims totaling $140,090.73 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that said claims be approved for payment. • ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL Claims totaling $429,569.15 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn, and carried that said claims be approved for payment. THE COURT ADJOURNED. 348 REGULAR JULY TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I HELD JULY 8, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 8th day of July, A.D. 1991, • there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, withing said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog opened with the invocation and led the Court in the Pledge of Allegiance. BIDS AND PROPOSALS -VARIOUS INSURANCE Insurance proposals were received from Texas Association of Counties and from Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Co. of Victoria, as follows. Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that these be studied further and table any decision until Thursday, July llth. `�riox: TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES e P.O. BOX 2131 AUSTIN,TEXAS 78168 v ;al •'�� CALHOUN COUNTY PROPOSAL FOR COVERAGES PROPOSAL DATE: JULY 8, 1991 E.FFECIIVE DATE: FROM 7-17-91 TO 7-17-92 ' Coxemr Option Option OplioIl1± General -0- Ded. $5,000 Ded. $10,ODO Ded. Liability Bodily Injury $11,360 $9,813 $8.954 $100,000 person $300,000 occurrence . Property Damage $100,000 occurrence Automobile -0- Ded. $ 1,000 Ded. $5,000 Ded. ' Liability Bodily Injury $14,651 $13,652 $12,467 $100,000 person $300,000 occurrence P1Damage • $I00,0000,00 0 occurrence Automobile $250 Ded. $500 Ded. $1,000 Ded. Physical Damage $25,I0I $21,085 $16.549 TOTAL QUOTE $51,112 $44.550 ( $37,970 , INSURANCE PROPOSALS • For the following types of coverage: COVERAGE INCEPTION DATE TEXAS COMMERCIAL PACKAGE 07-17-91 (Policy # TCX 310857) CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT FLOATER 07/17/91 (Policy # TIX 911599) FLEET 07/17/91 , (Policy # TAX 381207) BOILER & MACHINERY 07/17/91 (Policy # BMI-HN-4335958-00) COVERAGE IS TO BE THE SAME AS UNDER EXISTING POLICIES WHICH MAY BE REVIEWED IN THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, CALHOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. (Policies must remain in the County Auditor's Office.) DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE UPON PAYMENT OF A $10.00 DEPOSIT, REFUNDABLE TO BIDDERS SUBMITTING A SEALED PROPOSAL. ALL INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BIDDER. • PROPOSAL AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUSIVE OF STATE TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER COSTS OF THE INSURANCE POLICY. (Rates quoted will be guaranteed for 12 months. Second and third years will be re -negotiated with same carrier.) PROPOSAL ANNUAL PREMIUM 3-YEAR PREMIUM 1) TEXAS COMMERCIAL PACKAGE $ Not Quoted $ N/A 2) CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT FLOATER $ Not Quoted $ N/A 3) FLEET -Liability $14,651 (0 Deductible) $ N/A FLEET- Physical Damage $16,549 1,000 Deductible N A 4) BOILER & MACHINERY $Not Ouo er1 $ N/A 5) GENERAL LIABILITY $11,360 (0 Deductible) N/A NAME: Texas Association of Counties ADDRESS: P n any ➢111 - CITY, STATE, ZIP: Austin, TX 78768 PHONE NUMBER: 519 A7R-R7r; • AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE. TITLE: Director of if Insura ce Progr! qs Aclmnistration ALL POLICIES ISSUED WITH 60 DAY NOTICE OF CANCELLATION PROVISION 350 [INSURANCE PROPOSALS • For the following types of coverage: TEXAS COMMERCIAL PACKAGE (Policy I TCX 310857) - CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT FLOATER (Policy 9 TIX 911599) FLEET (Policy I TAX 381207) BOILER & MACHINERY (Policy $ BMI-1111-4335950-00) COVERAGE INCEPTION DATE 07-17-91 07/17/91 07/17/91 07/17/91 COVERAGE IS TO BE THE SAME AS UNDER EXISTING POLICIES WHICH MAY BE REVIEWED IN THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, CALHOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. (Policies must remain in the County Auditor's Office.) DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE UPON PAYMENT OF A $10.00 DEPOSIT, REFUNDABLE TO BIDDERS SUBMITTING A SEALED PROPOSAL. ALL INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BIDDER. PROPOSAL AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUSIVE OF STATE TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER COSTS OF THE INSURANCE POLICY. • (Rates quoted will be guaranteed for 12 months. Second and third years will be re -negotiated with same carrier.) PROPOSAL ANNUAL PREMIUM 1) TEXAS COMMERCIAL PACKAGE $ 41,529.00 2) CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT FLOATER $ 6,648.00 3) FLEET $ 41,762.00 4) BOILER & 1ACHINERY $ 688.00 NAME: Hilb. Rogal, and Hamilton Co. of Victoria ADDRESS: 'P.O. Box 3710 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Victoria, Texas 77903 PHONE NUMBER: 1-512-575-8256 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: President • 3-YEAR PREMIUM a 351 NEW HOSPITAL -CHANGE ORDER -PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that Change Order Number One (1) for Memorial Medical Center as presented by Page Southerland Page, be approved. CHANGE OWNER ARCHITECT ORDER CONTRACTOR A/A DOCUAfEAT_G701 FIELD OTHER PROJECT: -Memorial Medical Center (name, address) 810 N. Ann St. TO CONTRACTOR: Port Lavaca, Tx. 77979 (name, address) Krueger Construction Co P.O.Box 3613 Victoria, Tx. 77901 The Contract is changed as follows: CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: One, {1), DATE: June 14,1991 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 489450 CONTRACT DATE: May 24,1991 CONTRACT FOR: Phase 1 Addition and Renovating to Memorial Medical Center Port Lavaca, Texas • Relocate the Helipad as shown on Supplementary Drawing SP-1 and'Sp.2 dated May 3,1991 • and further clarfied in Revision No.1 dated 6/14/91 and Drawing No. 101,102 and 103. sure 17 1991 Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract sum) (dG SXtX71Y 1f>7 X,SXavi1F }Sj was ........................ s 5,340,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ............................... s -0- The (Contract Sum) (GXXM8dG48>XMX>X)Ri4 prior to this Change Order was.......... s 5,340,000.00 The (Contract Sum) ( ) will be f x3auljl (decreased) (IXa(ti3E,}¢S4 by this Change Order in the amount of ............................ s 7,565.00 The new (Contract Sum)including this Change Order will be ..s 5,332,435.00 The Contract Time will be( A)(cMMKI)(unchanged) by ( 0 )days. The dutc of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore IN. remains September 5, 1992. • NOTE: This summary does not reflect lunges in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Gwnntttd Maximum Price which have bccn authoriwd bl Consuuction Change Directive. Paee Southerland Paee ARCHITECT 7Y11 Regency Square Blvd Ada ess Houston x. 77036 • /� ^ BYAT W�.�l�✓ n DATE �� frf - 9)- rueee CONTRACTOR v n nox-3613 Address Victoria, Tx. Z7901 BY DATE G - /d - f Calhoun County Commissioner T[. OWNER 211 S. Ann St. Address // Port L 6aca Tx 7 BY DATE � NA DOCUMENT G701 • d1ANGE ORDER • 19117 EDITION Au• ®1967 THE AMERICAN INST111rol OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YOM AVE.. N.W., WASIHNGTON, D.C. 2MA G701-1987 352 C 0 CHANGE ORDER A7A DOCUAIEAT G701 OWNER -40 ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Memorial Medical Center (name, address) 810 N. Ann St. TO CONTRACTOR: Port Lavaca, Tx. 77979 (name, address) Krueger Construction Co P.O.Box 3613 Victoria, Tx. 77901 The Contract is changed as follows: CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: One DATE: June 14,1991 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 489450 CONTRACT DATE: May 24,1991 CONTRACT FOR: Phase 1 Addition and Renovating to Memorial Medical Center Port Lavaca, Texas Relocate the Helipad as shown on Supplementary Drawing SP-1 and Sp.2 dated May 3,1991 and further clarfied in Revision No.1 dated 6/14/91 and Drawing No. 101,102 and 103. Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract sum) was ........................ s 5,340,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ............................... S —0— The (Contract Sum)(CrX11L1tls'RBraMX>xMlQ4 prior to this Change Order w'as .......... s 5,340,000.00 The (Contract Sum) (�G}ulF3iilidF&I '7Ai�;&((yr11XXiXc) will be jKgja g(tj) (decreased) (uY� KJX4Xd)bythisChangeOrderintheamountof ............................ S 7,565.00 The new (Contract Sum) 0015XHX4EXXWif$XItiRI)1° 4 including this Change Order will be ..S 5,332,435.00 The Contract Time will be( A)(dWf)(uncI—gcd)by ( 0 )loss. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date or this Change Order therefore a remains September 5,1992. NOTE: This summary does not renect cinnges in the Contma Sum, Comma Time or Gwomerd Maximum Price which have been authurbxd In Construction Cl=gc DireClive. ' Pie Southerland Page _Krueger Construction Calhoun County CDalmrSS ORer TE. ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR OWNER nddr" aiRe venpy� Blvd n 0 Sox 361+ 211 S. Ann St. HoustoofTx. 7 036 Address Victoria, Tx. 37901 Address Port L v a T 79 BY BY _ BY `Y 7T — I y ^ I ^ �I DATE / DATE a DATE • AlA DOCUMENT Wit • CHANGE ORDER AMERKJ.N INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1755 1907 EDITION AA• • 01987 • THE NEW YOM AVE.. N.W., WASIIINGTON, D.C. zmx; G701-1987 353 DISCLAIMER AND RESEVATION RIGHTS ON MATAGORDA ISLAND Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Court authorize Criminal District Attorney Jack Whitlow to seek clarification on Calhoun County's Disclaimer and Reservation as provided by Cause #70-V-14 U.S. Dist. Ct.,So. Dist and to obtain local resident legal counsel to assist . RESOLUTION -HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT DISTRICT 13-YOAKUM Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and Court tht the inthe State ofa aTexas not rto consolidate t pass the lthe nY akumldistrictution goffice. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Highway Department District 13 Yoakum office occupies 10,000 square miles made up of the following: Austin, Calhoun, Colorado, DeWItt, Fayette, Gonzales, Jackson, Lavaca, Matagorda, Victoria, and Wharton counties and maintains 3,392 centerline miles of highway which translates into 8,134,000'vehicle miles traveled; and WHEREAS, this district has approximately 440 employees with an approximate payroll of $11,350,000 and administers approximately $4,000,000 of maintenance contracts annually; and WHEREAS, there is currently $59,000,000 worth of construction underway in this district and projects in the Project Development Plan that amount to $137,000,000; and WHEREAS, the Yoakum district office has consistently demonstrated the ability to prepare construction plans at an economical cost, ranking sixth in the state for below average cost of all projects of the previous three years; and WHEREAS, this district has shown a.remarkable retention of quality employees in design engineering, right of way acquisition and maintenance, all of which add to the effectiveness and economy of its operations; and WHEREAS, the possibility of consolidating the Yoakum highway department district office has been published in the State Comptroller's Report; and WHEREAS, the counties served so ably served by this office are experiencing economic growth with expansion of the petro-chemical and other industries, thus increasing their need for adequate highway transportation in this area; and WHEREAS, creation of bigger governmental agencies do not always translate into better services; and WHEREAS, the consolidation of the Yoakum office would significantly impact the economy of the area served; it would also result in the loss of accessibility to highway projects funding; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT. the Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County urges the state of Texas not to consolidate the Yoakum district office, but rather to expand it so that the rural counties served will have continued access to necessary highway services. of Tex. is • 354 • SIGNED this p X,L day of Y , 1991 �tte&. Mbrrit?ne Paul, County Clerk 1� u 355 RESOLUTION -BUDGETING BEACH CLEAN UP FUNDS Motion by Commissioner Leroy Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following Resolution to keep beach clean up funds intact be approved. WHEREAS, tourism is the number two source of income in the state of Texas; and the economy of Calhoun County is dependent upon these out of state dollars; and WHEREAS, tourists will not visit a beach spoiled by unsightly litter; and WHEREAS, the 72nd Legislature increased the funding for the beach clean up fund from $680,000 to $1.2 million per year; and WHEREAS, these beach clean up funds are administered by the Texas General Land Office and flow directly to Coastal Counties; and WHEREAS, Counties without these funds would be unable to fund beach clean up, thereby losing valuable tourist visitors to their beaches. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that this Commissioners Court of Calhoun County endorses -the action taken by the 72nd Legislature in increasing these beach clean up funds; and FURTHERMORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, this court encourages the Texas Legislature meeting in special session on budget and appropriation matters, to keep these beach clean up funds intact in the amount of $1.2 million per annum and administered by the Texas General Land Office. SIGNED this 19--!-2- day of July, 1991. Attest: COMMIZ(UHArYi&ocf1_ty CALHO By Howard,,�%�u ge By 3&44 - Leroy Bel cam, %� comm., Pct. By Sta y/oula,Comm__.__,��PPc/cct. By / / n�/ Helen Smith, Comm., Pct. _3 BY Oscar Hahn, Comm., Pct. 4 • • r L 356 ELECTION JUDGES, ALTERNATE JUDGES & DESIGNATION OF POLLING PLACES FROM AUGUST 1, 1991 THROUGH JULY 31, 1992 C� is Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court appoint the following elections officials and designate polling place for 1991-1992. ELECTION JUDGES, ALTERNATE JUDGES AND DESIGNATION OF POLLING PLACES 1991-1992 Absentee canvasing Judge Election Pct. No. 1 Courthouse Annex Election Pct. No. 2 Bauer Exhibit Bldg. Election Pct. No. 3 Jackson Elem. School Election Pct. No. 4 Pct.l Whse. Magnolia Beach Election Pct. No. 5 Appraisal Dist. Office Election Pct. No. 6 Travis Middle School Election Pct. No. 7 Pct. 2 Whse,Six Mile Election Pct. No. 8 Hwy. Dept.Office Election Pct. No. 9 Housing Auth.Community Rm. Election Pct. No. 10 Rice Farmers' Office Election, Pct. No 11 Travis School Science Bldg Election Pct. No. 12 Farmers Gin Election Pct. No. 13 School District Office Election, Pct. No. 14 First Baptist Church Election Pct. No. 15 Bauer Community Center Election Pct. No. 16 Olivia Fire Dept. Bldg. Election Pct. No. 17 Point Comfort City Hall Election Pct. No. 18 Roosevelt Elementary School Election Pct. No. 19 Hugo Sturm Residence Election Pct. No. 20 Calco Grain Co. Office Election Pct. No. 21 Pct. 4 Whse,Seadrift Election Pct. No. 22 Port O'Connor Fire Station Election Pct. No. 23 WCID pl Office, Hwy 35 Ms. Carolyn Fricke, Judge Ms. Diane Howell, Alternate Ms. Juanita Boyd, Judge Ms. Jean Boyd,,Alternate Ms. Patsy Wilborn, Judge Rose Marie Knobles, Alternate Ms. Barbara Neill, Judge Ms. Syble Belk Darnall,Alternate Ms. Mary Nash, Judge James Carlin, Alternate Ms. Antonia Reyes,.Judge Ms. Katherine Fox, Alternate Ms. Ed Vela, Judge Ms. Otis Trimble, Alternate Ms. Bertha Kabela, Judge Ms. Viola Marek, Alternate Ms. Tom Gibson, Judge Ms. Janice Mayfield Ms. Mary Louise Pina,Judge Minerva Avalos, Alternate Ms. Guadalupe Cantu, Judge Ms. Antonio Guzman, Alternate Ms. John Burleson, Judge Ms. Wanda Moreno, Alternate Ms. S. A. Bradley, Judge Ms. Theresa Gamez, Alternate Ms. Lester(Jackie) Priddy Ms. Maria Sparks , Alternate Ms. Ruth Oliver Judge Mr. PeteWrigge, Alternate Ms. Carl Partlow, Judge Ms. Kathleen Sledge„ Alternate Ms. Ervin Hermes, Judge Ms. Diane Behrens, Alternate Ms. Larry Hamilton, Judge Ms. John Hlavaty, Alternate Ms. L. C. Gossett, Judge Ms. Rose Venecia, Alternate Ms. Joyce Smith, Judge Ms. Shirley Sturm, Alternate Ms. Harold Evans, Judge Ms. Charlotte Manuel, Alternate Ms. Dorothy Wooldridge, Judge Ms. Karen Helms, Alternate Ms. Clara Thumann, Judge Ms. Pauline Gonzales, Alternate Ms. Janet Custer, Judge Ms. Hazel Priest, Alternate 357 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY • Claims totaling $61,716.49 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- HOSPITAL Claims totaling $1,758.41 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. THE COURT RECESSED. REGULAR JULY TERM HELD JULY 11, 1991 • THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN T BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the llth day of July, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. Z Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Boy Scout Ray Wagner. The Court then recessed to the District Courtroom due to the large • attendance. GENERAL DISCUSSION OF COUNTY BUSINESS Dick and Sue Traylor appeared before the Court and voiced their concern about the notification system at Formosa Plastics. No action was taken by the Court. 358 BOAT RAMP -PORT ALTO -REPORT FROM G & W The Court was informed by Ralph Wall of G & W Engineers that this was a public hearing regarding the proposed application to the Texas Parks & Wildlife Commission for the construction of a Public Boat Ramp in the Port Alto community. Public notice has been published on July 8th. Several citizens spoke voicing their concerns: F.B.Whit Waddell, Steve Faultersack, Eny, Faultersack,Carol Koepke, W. S. Hess, Jack McKelvy ,George Lemley, Wendall Holcomb, Mike Prasek, Carl Crowell, Doug Lynch, a message from Tom Laughlin, and some others. Motion was made by Commissioner Smith, to modify the Resolution and to request the Texas Parks & Wildlife maintain the access channel to the boat ramp. Commissioner Mikula seconded the motion. No vote was taken. Commissioner Mikula offerered an Amendment to the Motion that the • Resolution be approved as presented and that the County Judge negotiate a committment with Parks and Wildlife for the maintenance of the channel to the boat ramp. No vote was taken. Commissioner Smith withdrew her motion. Commissioner Mikula withdrew his second to Commissioner Smith's motion and his amendment to the motion. Commissioner Smith made the motion to table the Resolution, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried. • • BIDS AND PROPOSALS - INSURANCE Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Court accept the insurance proposal of Hilg, Rogal and Hamilton Co. of Victoria on the Texas Commercial Package, Contractor's Equipment Floater, .Fleet policy, Boiler and Machinery policy with $1,000,00 deductible as applicable. 11 INSURANCE.PROPOSALSI For the following types of coverage: TEXAS COMMERCIAL PACKAGE (Policy f TCX 310857) CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT FLOATER (Policy I TIX 911599) FLEET (Policy / TAX 361207) BOILER & MACIIINERY (Policy f DMI-1111-4335956-00) COVERAGE INCEPTION DATE 07-17-91 07/17/91 07/17/91 07/17/91 COVERAGE, IS TO BE THE SAVE AS UNDER EXISTING POLICIES WHICH MAY BE REVIEWED IN THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 211D FLOOR, CALNOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. (Policies must remain in the County Auditor's Office.) DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS MAY DE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE UPON PAYMENT OF A $10.00 DEPOSIT, REFUNDABLE TO 13IDDERS SUBMITTING A SEALED PROPOSAL. - ALL INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ARE TO DE COMPLETED BY THE BIDDER. PROPOSAL AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUSIVE OF STATE TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER COSTS OF THE INSURANCE POLICY. (Rates quoted will be guaranteed for 12 months. Second and third years will be re -negotiated with same carrier.) PROPOSAL 1) TEXAS COMMERCIAL PACKAGE 2) CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT FLOATER 3) FLEET 4 ) BOILER & MACHINERY NAME: IIIIb, Regal, and Hamilton Co. of Victoria ADDRESS: -P.O. Box 3710 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Victoria, Texas 77903 PHONE NUMBER: 1-512-575-8256 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: President ANNUAL PREMIUM $ 41,529.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 41,762.00 $ 688.00 3-YEAR PREMIUM 359 AMENDMENT OF 1989 TAX ABATEMENT, AND APPLICATION FOR TAX ABATEMENT ON NEW CONSTRUCTION AT FORMOSA PLASTICS Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the Court table any action on the application for further study and refer this to a committee consisting of Judge Hartzog and Commissioner Mikula return at a later time to present is the Court a possible agreement. (Outline follows) RE: TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS MAY 31,1989 & JUNE 20,1989 & PROPOSED I. ORIGINAL ABATEMENT AGREEMENT May 31, 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement $1,700,000,000.00 Less Aromatics Plant $ 260,000,000.00 Less Styrene Monomer Plant $ 95,000,000.00 Less Shore Side Tank Farm $ 49,000,000.00 $1,296,000,000.00 COST ADJUSTMENTS - $271,000,000.00 • TOTAL $1,025,000,000.00 II. PROPOSED AMENDED ABATEMENT AGREEMENT ORIGINAL UNIT COSTS: May 31, 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement Olefins $295,000,000.00 Caustic/Chlorine $230,000,000.00 Utilities $140,000,000.00 Ethylene Glycol $150,000,000.00 High Density Polyethylene $ 70,000,000.00 Polypropylene $ 90,000,000.00 Ethylene Dichloride $ 25,000,000.00 Buildings & Transportation Facilities $ 25 000 000.00 TOTAL $1,025,000,000.00 II1. PROPOSED 1991 TAX Permit Request • ABATEMENT AGREEMENT Received by TACB Linear Low Density Polyethylene Plant (LLDPE) $140,000,000.00 June 29, 1990 Two Co -generation units $29,000,000.00 Nov. 17, 1989 Cracking Furnace $16,000,000.00 March 271990 Polypropylene Train $9,000,000.00 May 16,1990 Marine Loading Facility $6 000 000 00 TOTAL $200,000,000.00 U�� 1r, L_J HOSPITAL -PURCHASE PHACO EMULSIFIER -BUDGET AMENDMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the purchase of a Phaco Emulsifier for the Hospital be declared an emergency and the purchase be approved in the amount of $20,000.00 and the Budget be amended to reflect same. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: V. J making this request) Date: q_II_gI I request an amendment to the M / budget for the year following line items in my department: GI: Account 1/ - Amendment Account Name Amount t, o 0 o Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: .i � �r_t► � ot, PH JUL 1 1 1991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 361 BUDGET AMENDMENTS- GROUP INSURANCE,GENERAL FUND -DISTRICT COURT JUSTICE OF THE PEACE,PCT.13, BUILDING MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT - JAIL - SHERIFF'S DEPT.-NARCOTIC'S DIVYSION- ADULT PROBATION DEPT.-JUVENILE PROBATION -MUSEUM-HISTORICAL COMMISSION - LIBRARY -COUNTY CLERK- PARKS DEPT.- COUNTY TREASURER - COMMISSIONERS' COURT . TRAVEL_ Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following budW amendments be approved. 1 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: V (.(il.l.6u-(y CJQhgAJ . word Laj;/ � (Department making this request) qcf Date: /D_o_nl I request an amendment to the 111111 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account L Amendment Amount NO 3 qo7 17 s +( �U Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: 000,@l c m A. I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until • Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: A# (I L4: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: �G) Date posted to General Ledger account(s): JUL 1 11991 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST11 To: Calhoun {County// Commissioners' Court From: nU�V1A�i" (_A-(,d- • (Department making this request) Date: -1 - d -11 1 I request an amendment to the I�III budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -#- ---Account-Name ---Name ___Amount ---- ----------M ---- ro � 1 4 OJ 0 3� 1 . 'L a "d L,, .ti XZD,9l;Lc.2,— dg+/, D f zt --(30) Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Reason _ /Wnln4o 1) ur� a a�1v�n-1�4iati� IV,0 , tt I I U I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. signature of official/department head: R _n „.( k ,/l, )'1_1" (lp �ti Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): iI p p p W T A 1 11991 0 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Peui,PO 43 ( epart((ment aking this request) Date: 6 - I 1- l I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account-i/- + • 1 ---Account Name e Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: Amendment Amount Reason ------------- ------------------- &.1 iAlkl xn LA\j l9U-- O� ) $ -0 - • �J I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: HellQIeoc / • Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account s): IVII p Q JUL 1 1 1991 364 (BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court r • II I From: i IA t O CA 1A- aAm,; aiYl IA, (Departs nt making this request) Date: /0 a 0 -q I request an amendment to the I9 y_1_ budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account-#_ 0 1- LI 0 05 - rL301 ni-y,J05-�i�l Amendment -Account Account -Name _ --Amount- ' - -�- � J 0 U Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): ` ir\ p p JUL 1 1 1991 n U q 365 1 I BUDGET ANENDME=� NTTRREBUESTII • lo: Calhoun county Commissioners' Court From: Emergency Management (Department making this request) Date: May 31, 1991 I request an amendment to the _ 1991 _ budget for the (year) following line items in my department: GL Account 0 01-45-05-6320 Account Name ------------------ Travel-out of county Net change in total budget for this department iss Dther remarks/justification: Amendment Amount Reason $500..00 This amendment is being requested due to the in 500.00 s saaaaecaaavv crease demands by FEMA.for EMA funded jurisdictions for additional training sessions for personnel. I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head! Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to Beneral.Ledger account(sl! e ! u O vq P JUL i )I • • IIBUDGET AMENDME14T REQUESall 1111 Iu: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Calhoun Co. Jail Division .—V f)Jepartment making this request) • Uate: May 31 1991 1 request an amendment to the ___1991____ budget for the (year) following llne items in my department - Amendment OL Account N Account t)amR Amount "Ralson 5101 Gen, office supplies 500.00 1991 Budget load qua 5550 Groceries 16,000.00 1991 Budget Inadequate, 6930 Physicals 400.00 1991 Budget inadennnte L Wet change in total budget for this department Ins $ 16,900.00' v uvavavvvevvs Uther remarks/justification- See attached letter for justification 1 understand that my budget cannb tbeamended as requested until 'Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department heads y ;Z-1 Date of Commissioners' Court approvals Date posted to General Ledger account(s)l II� JUL11 1991 / 1 L-J 367 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTI` I In: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • from: Calhoun County Sheriff's Department , a (Department making this request) Date: May 31, 1991 I request an amendment to the _ 1991--,-- budget for the (year) following line items in my department:- Amendment GL Account ii Account Name Amount Reason Y M1M1YYM1M1NYYYYY M1YYYY1YYYtYNYYYYYY YIYM1YYYYYIYY+. YY".'wYYY1YM1YM1YYYYNYY 01"1i-500 -5101 General Office Supplies 1,000.00 1991 Budget inadequate 5220 Machinery/Parts/Supplies 2,000.00 1991 Budget inadequate 5230 Gasoline/Oil 4,000.00 1991 Budget inadequate 5601 Law Enforcement Supplies 1,500.00 1991 Budget inadequate 6420 Training/Travel expenses 2,000.00 1991 Budget inadequate 6522 Automotive repairs 7,500.00 1991 Budget inadeauate • 6930 Physicals 604.5e 1991 Budget inadequate Net change in total budget for this department ism $ 18,604.X oaavaxvevv®va Other remarks/justification: See attached letter for justification I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: ,JUL I 1 1991 r • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): BUDGET AMEND T MWEST�I To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Calhoun Co. Narcotic's Division „11 • (Department making this request) Date: May 31, 1991 I request an amendment to the _ __199.1___ budget for the (year) following line items in my department- Amwndmwnt GL Account H Account Namw Amount Nwason R RFtryYYRYRIYF RRRM1RFFRRFM1IIFYYRR YtFRFF1YRIRM1F RYryFM1YYRRRM1YFRIRFM1F (h 46g5 - 6930 Physicals 121.E 6 1991 Budget inadequate • )Jet change in total budget for this department ins other remarks/justification: See attached letter for justification JUL 1 1 1 understand that my budget cannot'be'amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head- Date of Commissioners' Court approvals Date posted to General Ledger account(s)- C 369 U1 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTil • To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Adult Probation Department (Department making this request) Date: 7_2_91 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account 0 14550-6550 U g5liO- 7314 01-g550- 6460 Account -Name --- Radio Maintenance Training Equipment Training Schools Net change in total budget for this department is: Amendment Amount 00 - 53,W - 191� + 480.00 J 3G.0O Other remarks/justification: Three (3) DWI Classes remain to be taught during 1991 at needs $1080.00 total to handle this expense. There is c account. Reason Transfer to Traininq Schools Transfer to Training Schools Increase account to satisfy remaining DWI Classes. JUL I 1 10 cct. 6460 $600.00 in this I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: \\S Date of Commissioners' Court approval: 6. - Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 370 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • From: Calhoun Co Juvenile Probation Department (Department making this request) Date: June 28 1991 I request an amendment to the ,1991 budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name ---Amount --Reason 01-4555-6103 • Contract Expense - Juvenile Probation $623.00 See Below Net change in total budget for this department is: $ ---- rLIL-O9____ Other remarks/justification: These are additional expenses that Juvenile Court had incurred and our department has exhausted the funds for additional psychological testings. I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • I() 371 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST it • To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: ` / �' //��� ' (Department making this request) Date: 1. 3 _ q l I request an amendment to the Iq q I budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -#- ---Account ---- ---- Name ---Amount-------Reason --------------� ------ '~o1-Lan---15,a! UY4. �Q<�jn� _301 `�IvlJoW- 4- /ill t QA rn 1 Net change in total budget o 0 for this department is: $ — Al ------------- other remarks/justification: JUL II 1991 ft I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. v Signature of official/department head:h� Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 372 �a BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST • To: Calhoup Cou ty Commiss' ' Court 0 00 5, (60101 5� y/1I From: � ner (Departme t making this request) () Date: 141I r' I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount • Net change in total budget i s : other remarks/justification: lE JUL 1 1 1991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 373 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: CalhounCountyCommissioners' Court From: ����..��� � 1"lf�./ l (2 .1 —L'V- (I�hIr,1I = // (i (Delpartm t making this requ st) Date: (o - I `1 1 I request an amendment to the l 1I budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account_#- f!0.6 ._1 (o,1- /,2 n (- mlo Account-Name--- Amendment Amount Reason I--��---1 -��-J ------------ IJ Ca -oh hc��m�p • Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Jt UL 111991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. I I Signature of official/department head: I) )ntha Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 374 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST • To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: Marlene Paul, County Clerk (Department making this request) Date: July 10, 1991 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount 01-15-20-4705 Temporary Employees $600.00 • • Reason ------------------- I[ To increase budget Net change in total budget PLUS for this department is: $ 600.00 ______ Ir JUL 111991 Other remarks/justification: WHEN I WAS ALLOWED MONEY FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYES T 1GffM FAO AN HOUR. I WAS FORTUNATE TO FIND 2 PART TIME EMPLOYEES THAT WERE EMPLOYED IN THE COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE BEFORE AND PAY THEM $7.00 AN HOUR I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested un '1 Commissioners' Court approval is obtained., Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 375 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: 0( , -. ��. I I.r,. (DepartmefSt making this request) Date: 1,I 1_q1 I request an amendment to the J9 C11 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account-#- 01 - (OJO 593 0 1 - 4 oar--67 SD Amendment ---Account Name ---Amount --------- Reason -f�o— III Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: JUL 1 1 1991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. //� (� Signature of official/department head: PoA (/ A&8 &L \ Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 16 • • 376 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calho County Commissioners' Court From: r4Uhl= JAUNI %I2 • (Department making this request) -/ Date: 1—' I_11 1 I request an amendment to the l II budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount j� ��- 3510-71UI AP-Jb zt 5006 • Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: Reason ------------------- I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 377 16 SIIDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST 11 To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: ...,Department Valdn4 this request) Date: � - I I _q I I request an amendment to the 1% budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -#----Account-Name --- ---Amount ---- -------Reason -------------------- i I0A'(Kb'C N Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: M JUL 1 1 1991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head:n�/�-- Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • L� 378 i7-j • WN wu 1 1991 L CJ 379 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY Claims totaling $356,839.09 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. COUNTY TREASURER -QUARTERLY REPORT MONTHLy REPORT The County treasurer presented her Monthly and Quarterly report and after reading and verifying same , a motion was made by Commissioner Smith , seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that said reports be approved, CA1IOt44 COUNry, TEXAS STIVIT!'ENr OF BALANCES Balance Balance 4/1/91 Receipts Disbursenents 6/30/91 General Road & Bridge General S 4,755,908 S 589,967 $1,251,433 $ 4,094,442 Road & Bridge Precinct 1 859.654 106,668 173,721 101,607 255,620 777,755 Road & Bridge Precinct 2 88,670 86,065 80,532 67,025 126,143 107,710 (toad & Bridge Precinct 3 Road & Bridge Precinct 244,817 81,253 40,909 285,161 4 FM -Lateral Road 206,918 164,563 203,015 168,466 Road Maintenance Precinct 1 1,053,924 61.074 26,626 201,859 878,691 Road Maintenance Precinct 4 9,460 998 157 -o- 62,072 Lateral Road Precinct 1 3,765 62 -o- 9, 617 Lateral Road Precinct 2 3,765 62 -o- ,67 Lateral Road Precinct 3 3,765 62 -o- 3,827 Lateral Road Precinct 4 3,765 62 -o- 3,827 Flood control Precinct 1 75,639 2,063 -a- -o- 3,827 Flood Control Precinct 2 871. 14 77,702 Flood control Precinct 3 1,131 200 -o 885 Flood Precinct 4 11, 175 15 -o- - 12,331 Landtrol Sanitaryry landfill 277,078 64,330 -o- 57,720 1,150 283,688 Sanitary Landfill Replacenent Airport 50,062 46,192 500 125, 754 Maintenance Rank Tax 21,452 1,g33 4,858 18,027 Law Library 91;628 1.303 35,627 57, Libr Library Gif aryeift-Memorial 76 . 127 4,123 3, 760 439 Voter Registration 1 4,751 -o- 62 -o- 127 127 Fine & Court Costs holding 22,332 10,904 2,495 11,373 2,318 Donations Grants 28,370 10,181 214 21,663 38,337 Juvenile Probation 9,243 21,516 59,527 1,500 67,270 District Court - I�rest Jury8,009 2,,522 9,280 1,352 22,787 County Court I rest jury n Revenue 718 1,564 2,574 1,300 Excess Sales Tax 470,546 323,808 2,118 164 Capital Project - Bos ital P 518,024 8,456 -0- 794,354 Capital Project - New Library Bldg. Library 26,382 426 -0- 5, 526,480 Cert. of Wlig. Constr. 556 21, Library Cert. of Oblig. Int. & Skg. 21,492 1,455 396 375 166 166 General Wli p, 9. Bonds Inn Constr. General 7,240,350 119, 75 21,338 22, Wlig. Bonds Int. &Skg. 40, 35D , 599 5gg 7,322,427 (lospital Operating I lospital E� Sinking 288,200 1,760,045 24 1,713,814 40,925 334,431 ho hospital Menrial 3, 171 259 46 -o- 3,217 Indi Indigent Healthcare Totals 1,827 2 117,633 211 117,463 50 $16. 647.096 $3, 769 915 34,109.760 1,997 516.312,241 We the undersigned County Judge and Connissioners in and for Calhoun County, Texas, hereby certify that we have this date madefdue an e'x�amination E t e County Treasurer's quarterly report, filed with us on this day of and have found .the same to be correct anorder. 1991, WITNESS OUR IVdNDS, officially, this d 1991. �1 I toward Ilar ,og,\C�o,in County Judge DSO ��missioner Precinct I4o. 1 leg S th, Canmssioner Precinct Nb, 3 n ey la, Canmssioner Pet. No. 2 - Oscar II " Canniss o erer Pc �_ SWORN 1 AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, County Judge and County Ca 'ssi ners of said Calhoun County, each respectively, on this *p� p /ilc day of l lei J.y 1991. BEFORE Tr the undersigned authority on this day personally-appaa=red PfBhar-ron-Narek, County Trees Calhoun County, says that the within and foregoing report is true and: 2drrect. (� 5:, SI rron Marek, County treasurer FID. EOIi RECORD111I �� day of /LJ�'(_ day of 199 1991 and re fled is --tom--'-....-(•44i.Fy>;�a-L_.-, UllHa.. (/ Q Marlene 111LII, County Clerk i • • 380 TAX ASSESSOR-COLLEC'TOR'S MONTHLY REPORT The County Tax Assessor -Collector presented her monthly report for May, 1991, and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that said report be approved. THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL JULY TERM HELD JULY 22, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 22nd day of July,.A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City'o£ Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State,.and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: • Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct.' 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Marlene Paul County Clerk Commissioner Hahn was absent. whereupon the following proceedings were had: The invocation was given by Judge Hartzog, which was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. GENERAL DISCUSSION -CONCERNING FORMOSA-TAX ABATEMENT Several people appeared before the court voicing their opinions against granting Formosa tax abatements. Those people speaking were Terri Austin, Diane Wilson, and Ray Crober. 'Jim Sheppard and Joe Wyatt were present from Formosa but had no comment. No action was taken. AMEND ORDER APPOINTING ELECTIONS JUDGES AND DESIGNATE.;POLLING PLACES`` Motion by Commissioner Belk; seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Order Appointing Election Judges and Designating Polling Places. • 381 AMENDED ORDER OF APPOINTMENT ELECTION JUDGES, ALTERNATE JUDGES AND DESIGNATION OF POLLING PLACES 1991-1992 Absentee canvasing Judge Ms. Carolyn Fricke, Judge Ms. Diane Howell, Alternate Election Pet. No. 1 Ms. Juanita Boyd, Judge Courthouse Annex Ms. Jean Boyd, Alternate Election Pct. No. 2 Ms. Patsy Wilburn, Judge Bauer Exhibit Bldg. Rose Marie Knobles, Alternate Election Pet. No. 3 Ms. Barbara Neill, Judge • Jackson Elem. School Ms. Syble Belk Darnall,Alternate Election Pet, No. 4 Ms. Mary Nash, Judge Pct.l Whse. Magnolia Beach James Carlin, Alternate Election Pet. No. 5 Ms. Antonia Reyes,.Judge Appraisal Dist. Office Ms..Katherine Fox, Alternate Election Pet. No. 6 Ms. Ed Vela, Judge Travis Middle School Ms. Otis Trimble, Alternate Election Pet. No. 7 Ms. Bertha Kabela, Judge Pct. 2 Whse,Six Mile Ms. Viola.Marek, Alternate Election Pct. No. 8 Ms. Tom Gibson, Judge . Hwy..Dept.Office Ms. Janice Mayfield Election Pet. No. 9 Ms. Mary Louise Pina,Judge Housing Auth.Community Rm. Minerva Avalos, Alternate Election Pet. No. 10 Ms. Guadalupe Cantu, Judge Rice Farmers' Office Ms. Antonio Guzman, Alternate Election, Pct. No.11 Ms. John Burleson, Judge Travis School Science Bldg. Ms. Wanda Moreno, Alternate Election Pct. No. 12 Ms. S. A. Bradley, Judge Farmers Gin Ms. Theresa Gamez, Alternate • Election Pet. No. 13 Ms. Lester(Jackie) Priddy 0 School District Office Ms. Maria Sparks Alternate , Election, Pct. No. 14 Ms. Ruth Oliver , Judge First Baptist Church Mr. Pete. Wrigge, Alternate Election Pct. No. 15 Ms. Carl Partlow, Judge Bauer Community Center Ms. Kathleen Sledge,, Alternate Election Pet. No. 16 Ms. Ervin Hermes, Judge Olivia Fire Dept. Bldg. Ms. Diane Behrens, Alternate Election Pet. No. 17 Ms. Larry Hamilton, Judge Point Comfort City Hall Ms. John Hlavaty, Alternate Election Pet. No. 18 Ms. L. C. Gossett, Judge Roosevelt Elementary School Ms. Rose Venecia, Alternate Election Pet. No. 19 Ms. Joyce Smith, Judge Hugo Sturm Residence Ms. Shirley Sturm, Alternate Election Pet. No. 20 Ms. Harold Evans, Judge Calco Grain Co. Office Ms. Charlotte Manuel, Alternate Election Pet. No. 21 Ms. Dorothy Wooldridge, Judge Pct. 4 Whse,Seadrift Ms. Karen Helms, Alternate Election Pet. No. 22 Ms. Clara Thomann, Judge • Port O'Connor Fire Station Ms. Pauline Gonzales, Alternate Election Pet. No. 23 Ms. Janet Custer, Judge Moreman Gin Office Ms. Hazel Priest, Alternate THE COURT RECESSED UNTIL JULY 23, 1991 at 10:00 A.M. 382 SPECIAL JULY TERM HELD JULY 23, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I • BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the 23rd day of July, A.D.', 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: The invocation was given by Judge Hartzog, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. REDISTRICTING Guinn & Morrison, attorneys working with the Court on redistrict- ing appeared and conferred with the Court as to the plans submitted. Several members of the Citizens Advisory Committee were also present. No action was taken by the Court. • GENERAL DISCUSSION - FORMOSA TAR ABATEMENT Several citizens of the county appeared and expressed their appreciation for Formosa and the expansion in Calhoun County. Among those speaking were: Don Bridges, Bill Cunningham -Prime Equipment, C.D. George, representing AARP and Nation Retired Teachers Assoc., Ray Stweart-Days Inn, Russell Cain, Cain Real Estate, and Board of Realtors, Lee Williams -Cunningham Real Estate, and Board of Realtors, Dell Weathersby-Chamber of Commerce, Luke Boy -Formosa employee, Wiley Morgan -Seafood Companies, Faye Sterling, Mayor Daniel, City of Seadrift,.Joe Wyatt. Speaking against the abatement was Dianne Wilson. Court went into closed session to confer with attorney. CLOSED SESSION -CONFER WITH ATTORNEY The Court being in open session in compliance with the pertinent provisions of Sec. 3A of Art. 6252-17 of Texas Civil Statutes the County Judge as presiding officer publicly announced that a closed session would now be held under the provisions.of Sec. 2 (e) and (f) of said Art. 6252-17 for the purpose of conferring with the County's attorney. • The County Judge further publicly announced that before any final action, decision or vote is made regarding the subject.matter of said closed session, this meeting will be reopened to the public. The Court then went into closed session. At the end of the closed session the meeting was reopened to the public. 383 FORMOSA TAR ABATEMENT Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the application of Formosa Plastics Corp, Texas, to amend the 1989 agreement as per their request, be approved subject to the following: the economic criteria - the investment being reduced to $1.025 billion and the number of employees reduced to 850 and that we strengthen the 1989 agreement by substituting an amended abatement agreement as recommended by the county's legal • counsel and that we include a strong environment clause. That clause will state that if Formosa has an environmental violation where a state or federal environmental regulatory agency levies a fine or penalty for an environmental violation, then Formosa Plastics Corp., Texas would pay an unrestricted financial donation of an equal amount to Calhoun County. That the Court also approve Formosa Plastics Corp.,Texas' application requesting an additional abatement of an investment of $200 million dollars for a period of 7 years at 100% for years 1 and 2 and 85% for years 3,4,5,6 & 7, plus 15% additional abatement if 352 or more of the permanent employees for that project reside in Calhoun County; that Formosa Plastics Corp. also agree they would make an unrestricted financial donation of $750,000.00 cash, payable over 3 years in equal installments, payable on or before January 31, 1992, and again in 1993 and 1994. Further we instruct the County's attorney, Tom Garner to prepare the agreement accordingly. The Court Tax Abatement committee viewed the abatement on the $200 million dollar project as being an additional abatement for two years, which at today.'s tax rate would mean approximately $880,000.00 abated, and since the court was receiving an unrestricted financial donation of $750,000.00 and an opportunity to strengthen the 1989 tax abatement agreement, they felt it was in the best interest of the Court to approve the additional abatement for the $200 million dollar project. • THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL JULY TERM HELD JULY 29, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 29th day of July, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A. M. a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner,Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner,Pct. 2 • Helen J. Smith Commissioner,Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner,Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: The invocation was given by Judge Hartzog, which was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PORT ALTO BOAT RAMP Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula to reject the application of the boat ramp at Port Alto. Motion carried. FORMOSA TAX ABATEMENT • Attorney Tom Garner explained the Amended and new Tax Abatement, agreements with Formosa. No Action was taken. Expect to.be ready to sign August 12, 1991 The Court held a Budget Workshop the rest of the day. Judge Hartzog appointed Leroy Belk and Oscar Hahn to serve on a committee to review and decide the equipment needs of the new hospital. THE COURT RECESSED UNTIL 9:00 A.M. JULY 30, 1991 . JULY 30, 1991 @ 9:00 A.M. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT The Court continued the Budget Workshop session interviewing Department heads and elected officials as to their needs for the 1992 budget. No action was taken. THE COURT AJDOURNED. • SPECIAL JULY TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I I COUNTY OF CALHOUN 1 HELD JULY 31, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 31st day of July, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M , a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 whereupon the following proceedings were had: The Invocation was recited by Judge Hartzog, followed by the Pledge • of Allegiance . RESOLUTION -RING FISHER MARINE SERVICES,INC. Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court pass the following Resolution to support the renewal of their dredging permit. A copy was to be mailed to all agencies and Judge Hartzog and Commissioner Belk were to personally deliver the Resolution to the Corp. of Engineers, Galveston . 3uty RESOLUTION WHEREAS, King Fisher Marine Service, Inc., is the largest dredging company in Texas and has for thirty-five years been a vital part of Calhoun County's economy, being the single largest private employer in the county with 250 employees and an annual payroll of $6 million; and WHEREAS, King Fisher Marine Service, Inc., has always demonstrated concern for its employees and the county in which they live; and WHEREAS, King Fisher Marine Service, Inc., because of its proximity to the Intercoastal Canal, would be able to immediately begin work to reopen the Canal should it be closed by a hurricane; and WHEREAS, King Fisher Marine Service, Inc., is now applying for renewal of its dredging permit under the conditions that been have in place for the past 10 years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County, Texas, supports the renewal of this dredging permit with its existing conditions and urges the U. S. Corps of Engineers to do so without any further delay. 1991. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 31st day of July, . ATTEST: Marlene Paul, County C e • • BIOTRET -BIOLOGIC TREATMENT, INC.-PRESENTATION r1 i The Court heard a presentation by Charles Berry, President of Biologic Treatment,Inc. informing the Court of their services (brochure follows). Present were representatives from Aluminum Company of America and Formosa Plastics Corp. Texas. The Court took no action. BTI BIOTRETM BIOLOGIC TREATMENT, INC. 7015 Gulf Freeway Suite 212 Houston, Texas 77087 STATEMENT TO CALHOUN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT BY CHARLES BERRY PRESIDENT, BIOLOGIC TREATMENT, INC. Telephone: (713) 644-4338 FAX: (713) 644A276 JULY 31, 1991 IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION — • CCCC / LAVACA BAY / JULY 31, 1991 / PAGE 3 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, AS A SOLUTION, CAN SOMETIMES BE VERY EASY AND LIKEWISE, CAN BE DIFFICULT. IT SOMETIMES REQUIRES "POINT OF USE" OR "SITE SPECIFIC" STUDIES TO DETERMINE WHICH SPECIFIC FORMULATIONS AND APPLICATION METHODS WORK. IT DOES NOT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT, NOR DOES IT INCLUDE MAGIC, AND THERE'S NO HOCUS-POCUS TO IT. IT DOES NOT PROVIDE THE QUICK FIX FOR OUT OF SITE, OUT OF MIND PSYCHOLOGY, WHICH MAKES IT SUBJECT TO HYPED -UP MARKETING METHODS AND TO THE SKEPTICISM OF ACADEMIA AND LAYMEN ALIKE. THE TERM "BIOREMEDIATION" IS BECOMING VERY POPULAR AND TOPICAL. WE OFTEN FIND OURSELVES AT ODDS BY THE WAY SOME FIRMS USE THAT TERM. UNLIKE SOME METHODS, WE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY OR CULTURE THE INDIGENOUS BACTERIA AND THEN TRY TO ENHANCE THE INDIGENOUS BACTERIA WITH HIGH LEVEL NUTRIENTS AND OXYGEN. WE FIND THIS METHOD CAN HAVE ADVERSE GEOCHEMICAL EFFECTS AND POTENTIALLY HARM THE ALREADY IMPACTED ENVIRONMENT. ADDITIONALLY, OUR PRODUCT FORMULATIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF RECOMBINANT DNA OR GENE SPLICING. OUR FORMULATIONS ONLY ENCOMPASS NATURALLY OCCURRING, NON-PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS AND BIOTA. OUR DEFINITION OF THE TERM "BIOREMEDIATION" IS EMPLOYING SAFE, ACCELERATED DEGRADATION OF THE CONTAMINANT IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT PURPOSELY'VAPORIZE THE CONTAMINANT. OUR PRODUCT FORMULATIONS AND TREATMENT METHODS ARE NOT STRANGERS TO MERCURY OR METHYLMERCURY. IN AN AGRICULTURAL/SOIL APPLICATION, THEY HAVE STOPPED THE UPTAKE OF ELEMENTAL MERCURY IN MELON CROPS. IN WASTE 388 CCCC / LAVACA BAY / JULY 31, 1991 / PAGE 4 • WATER TREATMENT, METHYLMERCURY HAS BEEN REDUCED TO ELEMENTAL MERCURY. I'D LIKE TO IMPRESS ON THE COURT THAT WE ARE SERIOUS ABOUT HELPING CALHOUN COUNTY. HOWEVER, OURS IS A GROWTH INDUSTRY WITH TREMENDOUS MARKET POTENTIAL. IT IS THEREFORE A PRIMARY TARGET OF FIRMS THAT WILL SPEND MORE MONEY DESIGNING THEIR BROCHURE THAN THIS PROJECT WILL COST. CONSEQUENTLY, WE WOULD LIKE TO FOREWARN THE COURT THAT BTI HAS NO INTENTION OF PERPETUATING DEFENSIVE ACTION OR PROVIDING ITS DISCIPLINE, DEVELOPMENTS OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION TO COMPETITORS. OF COURSE, WE DO NOT EXPECT ANYONE TO SIMPLY TAKE OUR WORD ON THE EFFICACY OF OUR PRODUCT FORMULATIONS OR TECHNOLOGY AND .... WE ARE NOT HERE SEEKING AN ORDER TO INOCULATE ALL OF THE AFFECTED PORTIONS OF LAVACA BAY. WE ARE HERE TO MAKE YOU AND THE CITIZENS OF CALHOUN • COUNTY AWARE OF THIS ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY AS A VIABLE, ECONOMIC SOLUTION. WE WOULD LIKE TO ENTER INTO GENERAL DISCUSSIONS, WITH WHOMEVER THE COURT BELIEVES IS APPROPRIATE, TO DESIGN A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT OF OUR FORMULATION FOR MERCURY AND METHYLMERCURY. WE BELIEVE THE SPRINGTIME OF 1992 WILL PRESENT THE EARLIEST OPTIMUM CLIMATE FOR SUCH A TEST IN LAVACA BAY. SUCH A TEST SHOULD SPAN AT LEAST NINETY DAYS TO PROVIDE QUALITATIVE FIELD RESULTS. WE BELIEVE THAT SUCH A TEST CANNOT BE CONDUCTED BY BTI ALONE. WE WILL REQUIRE OTHER PARTIES TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TEST. SPECIFICALLY, • 389 • CCCC / LAVACA BAY / JULY 31, 1991 / PAGE 5 WE WOULD LIKE FOR THERE TO BE AN ACADEMIC INSTITUTION INVOLVED FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE DESIGN OF THE TEST THROUGH ITS COMPLETION. ALSO, IT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTIVE TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY PUBLIC INTEREST GROUP INVOLVED AS WELL, FOR INSTANCE, THE GULF COAST FOUNDATION, GCCA, OR SOME SUCH GROUP. WE BELIEVE THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SHOULD BE INVITED TO OBSERVE THE DESIGN AND CARRYING OUT OF THE TEST, AS SHOULD MANY OF THE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS DOING BUSINESS IN CALHOUN COUNTY. WE WOULD PREFER THAT ALL OF THESE GROUPS BE INVOLVED SO THEY CAN HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS. • WE REALIZE THAT THIS COURT WOULD BE TAKING ON A TREMENDOUS BURDEN IN TRYING TO BRING ALL OF THESE PARTIES TOGETHER TO PARTICIPATE, WITNESS, RECORD, AND, IN SOME INSTANCES, HELP PAY FOR THIS PROJECT. HOWEVER, THE RESULTS OF PERHAPS REACHING A FINAL AND AGREED TO SOLUTION FOR THE RESTORATION AND CLEANING UP OF LAVACA BAY IS, IN OUR OPINION, WORTH SUCH AN EFFORT. AT THE LEAST, THE TOXIC STRENGTH OF THE MERCURY AND METHYLMERCURY IS REDUCED, MAKING THE POSSIBILITY OF ITS REMOVAL FAR SAFER AND EASIER THAN IN ITS CURRENT STATE. WE COME TO YOU, BECAUSE IT IS OUR EXPERIENCE THAT GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES AND BUREAUS FAR REMOVED FROM THE LOCATION OF A CONTAMINATED AREA ARE EXTREMELY SLOW TO RESPOND TO THE CONCERNS OF THE PUBLIC. THIS COURT, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS LIVING EVERY DAY WITH THE • CONSEQUENCES OF A MERCURY CONTAMINATION THAT OCCURRED OVER A PERIOD c to CCCC / LAVACA BAY / JULY 31, 1991 / PAGE 6 • OF TIME ENDING IN THE MID SEVENTIES. UNFORTUNATELY, IF THIS COURT DOES NOT ASSERT ITSELF, WE FEAR THERE WILL BE ANOTHER FIFTEEN TO TWENTY YEARS OF INACTION. THE PEOPLE OF CALHOUN COUNTY AND TEXAS DESERVE BETTER. THEY DESERVE A CLEAN LAVACA BAY, AND SUCH A RESTORATION OF THE BAY NEED NOT COME AT THE EXPENSE OF SLOWING DOWN OR REVERSING THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF YOUR COUNTY. AS CONCERNED TEXANS, WE WOULD LIKE TO HELP. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. • OBJECTIVE: BIOLOGIC TREATMENT, INC. BIOREMEDIATION PROPOSAL / DEMONSTRATION PROJECT MERCURY CONTAMINATION LAVACA BAY / CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS To conduct a sanctioned on site/in situ demonstration project • within the contaminated bay for bioremediation feasibility. t PURPOSE: r' To effect biological control of the existing methylation and provide enhanced demethylation, thus stabilizing the mercury at its most elemental, less toxic state. THEORY: To provide a biomass which can reduce and control the mercury in a state of non-methylation and provide enhanced microbial degradation of existing methylmercury to elemental mercury. METHOD: To utilize in situ treatment by injection of nonpathogenic microbial products to the contaminated bottoms, minimizing destruction of existing marine and vegetation ecosystems. PARAMETERS: Utilize four project site "cells" for treatment application and qualitative results. Cell size should be at least 20 feet X 20 feet each, adjacent or contiguous for accessibility and perpendicular to tidal flow. Sea curtains would be utilized to reduce cross -contamination between cells. PARTICIPATION: COSTS: COMMENTS: A joint effort by BTI and interested parties is suggested whereby BTI would furnish equipment and microbial products to effect treatment, other parties to provide monitoring, sample and analysis requirement criteria. Subject to the number of interested parties, their degree of participation and multiple unknowns, BTI would provide its participation as stated for between $90,000 to $125,000. Due to the dynamic toxicity, prolonged residence time, and the inhibiting removal characteristics of mercury, biological stabilization/detoxification will prevail as the safest, most economical method of remediation. As on site, this proposed in situ project can give quantitative and qualitative results impossible to duplicate in a laboratory. BTI would like to demonstrate its technology in an effort to establish treatment criteria and product efficacy toward control of the current contamination and its affects on the environment. MAGNOLIA BEACH WASTE WATER FACILTY - PHASE II • Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried to authorize Testengeer,Inc. to advertise for bids for Phase II of the Magnolia Beach Waste Water facility with August 30th set as a date for the bid opening. SALARY ORDER -AMENDMENT -R & B PCT. ONE Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula, and carried that the Salary Order be amended retroactive to 7-16-91 for Precinct One Employee.(Budget amendment follows) 392 MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER BOARD -RESIGNATION OF ALEX HERNANDEZ Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that the Court accept the resignation of Alex R. Hernandez from the Memorial Medical Center Board with regret and send him a letter of thanks and appreciation. BIDS & PROPOSALS- FUEL BIDS FOR AUGUST Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and • carried that the Court accept the fuel bid of the low bidder Diebel Oil Co. for fuel for August. FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. UNLEADED GASOLINE PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE DIESEL FUEL THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR 1991 AND ENDING AUGUST 31, 1991. NTRACT PERIOD. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. $ 7 q X 2800 _ $ v $ 17r X 3000 = $ $X 2500 = AA�� $.,;,��567.5� TOTAL BID PRICE $4�Jp A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING AUGUST 1, NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE 'WELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE is 333 11 FUEL BID PROP08AL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICEIGALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ , 7 a 70 X 2800 = $ 0 3,5,t�V PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $. -7 ? 7P X 3000 = $ 3 q �, o DIESEL FUEL $ X 2500 = $� TOTAL BID PRICE THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 1991 AND ENDING AUGUST 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING • DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: : jo It A_ ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER : 1 -- 9 T)zykPy/L✓R Po r T l� ,9 v c ��T�2 �7 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE • 334 • FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE iuHE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO.- UNLEADED GASOLINE $ ,q,'a X 2800 = $ PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ %9.3 X 3000 = $ JJ 74i.0o DIESEL FUEL $ , 6rile X 2500 = $ /"/90- n0 TOTAL BID PRICE $ CO 41 c) ..20 THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 1991 AND ENDING AUGUST 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. • NAME OF BIDDER: 171,gL/R )7"z �o . ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE • 395 THE COURT RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT THE DAYS INN -PORT LAVACA. • CLOSED SESSION -PERSONNEL The Court being in open session in compliance with the pertinent provisions of Sec. 3A of Art. 6251-17 of Texas Civil Statutes the County Judge as presiding officer publicly announced that a closed session would now be held under the provisions of Sec. 2g of said Art. 6252-17 to consider personnel matters regarding the Sanitary Landfill. The County Judge further publicly announced that before any final action, decision or vote is made regarding the subject matter of said closed session, this meeting will be reopened to the public. • The Court then went into closed session. At the end of the closed session the meeting was reopened to the public. Commissioners Belk, Hahn and Smith voted to uphold the decision of Patricia Kimball, Sanitary Landfill supervisor, to terminate Gloria Saldivar. Commissioner Mikula abstained from voting as he had some question in his mind and would like to see if they could work things out to give Ms. Saldivar a second opportunity. TEXAS HERBICIDE REGULATIONS- SPRAYING Motion by Commissioner Hahn , seconded by Commissioner Mikula nad carried that the date for aerial application of 24-D in Calhoun County be set between March loth and September 1st. RESOLUTION TO INDEMNIFY FROM LITIGATIONS ELECTED COUNTY OFFICIALS ETC Motion by Judge Hartzog that the Court is in support of a Resolution to indemnify from litigation elected county officials, employees and board members for acts pursuant to their lawful discharge of duties and that the District Attorney and the County Judge work as a committee to put this language into the form of a Resolution to be • passed at a subsequent County Commissioners' Court meeting, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried. DISTRICT ATTORNEY - EMPLOYEE SALARY SUPPLEMENTS Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following Budget Amendment Request be approved and that the Salary Ordered be amended to reflect same. 396 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • From: 1JI6-[AA2x` C oni AV 2 (Department maki g this request) Date: q-ad -Cf I I request an amendment to the N qI budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account # Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended s Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 3 BUDGET AMENDMENT- R & B. PCT.ONE.-BUILDING INSPECTION -DISTRICT COURT ROAD & BRIDGE PCT. 13 - INDIGENT EXPENSE Motion by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following Budget Amendment requests be approved: BUDGET AMENDMENT �Tll To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (Department making this request) Date: / 9 _ 9 I request an amendment to the % 99 / budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount Reason f .. a,0 /A7 q9Vo y-b-0 r /_/41990 Net change in total budget ------------- (�� for this department is: Other remarks/justification: �" 3 • • I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): WS BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Auditor From: II • .mg ,�/r�r�nor�l,nU (Department making this request) Date: I request an adjustment to the current budget for my department. The following transfers result in a net change of zero tothe total budget for exnenditures by cateyor9 (i.e., Supplies, services, Capital outlay). GL Account Account Name Amendment Amount ------------- ------------------ (91A lIds-qbo��G�.S�T • Net change in total budget for this department is: . $ --- p___ Other remarks/justification: • -------Reason_ rnooOAo� i understand that this adjustment to my budget cannot be made without the approval of the County Judge. Signature of official/department .head: Phi ,An %a d M)8 1' APPROVAL (SIGNATURE) OF COUNTY JUDGE: �NLc�n�1/ Date of approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 399 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST • To: Calhoun County Auditor From: (Department making this request) Date: I request an adjustment to the current budget for my department. The following transfers result in a net change of zero to the total budget for expenditures by Outlay). category (i.e., Supplies, Services, Capital GL Account # Amendment Account -Name --- --- Amount Reason ------------------- 1 • Net change in total budget for this department is: $ p___ Other remarks/justification: _ I understand that this adjustment to my budget cannot be made without the approval of the County Judge. n Signature of official/department head: ���op,nnd l I D APPROVAL (SIGNATURE) OF COUNTY JUDGE: y�4 11 1 Date of approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): XU 31091 • 400 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • From:CI k 1 (Department m king this request) Date: `1 _ 1 _Q f I request an amendment to the i-t-I/ budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account # Og-I5no—N6 D� - /5o0-Ato 0R-A5oo-�f1� ___Account Name Amendment Amount Reason 08-Bgcb -5 3 • Net change in total budget for this department is: S other remarks/justification: E JUL 3 11991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): a IL 1 4"1 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County? ClDigmissione(rs' Court o�5) From: Il\ ) phkaA_ (Depodrtment making this request �} Date: -I 1 I request an amendment to the lq 11 budget for the following line items in my department: GL Account # Amendment _--Account Name ---Amount ------------- ---- --- b1-10�y � Jew Jr00D --- ©I--7oi - 0108 5oc�o Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: --//-��----Reason VJ;------------- 3 1 1991 • • S understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature -of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: c�iw, • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 402 C� BIDS - ADVERTISEMENT- INSURANCE POLICIES Motion by Commissioner Mikula, carried that the County Auditor bids for insurance policies on malpractice, County Clerks erro Clerk's errors and omission. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY seconded by Commissioner Belk and be authorized to advertise for Ambulande Drivers and attendants rs and ommission, and District Claims totaling $765,644.03 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- HOSPITAL Claims totaling $478,215.66 was presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that said claims be approved for payment. THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL AUGUST MEETING • THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN HELD AUGUST 2, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 2nd day of August, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. The Court met with the Citizen's Advisory Committe on re-distring, and those present were: Betsy Wilson, Laura Phillips, Louis Butler, • Earnest Kabela, Juaniece Madden, Lupe Gutierrez, Don Lenertz, Elvira Martinez, Roger Galvan. Also present were Rudy Zapata, Don Bridges, David Martinez, and a representative of the Port Lavaca Wave. Two new plans were presented , Plans 5 and 6. Those and other previous plans were considered. 403. After much discussion it was decided that any plans to be considered • should be submitted by August 19, 1991 The Committee was polled and agreed with this. A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula that August 19,1991 be the final date for acceptance of any plan or proposal to be submitted for consideration. No other action was taken. THE COURT RECESSED AND THE RE -DISTRICTING COMMITTEE ADJOURNED TO ALLOW COMMISSIONERS' COURT TO WORK ON THE BUDGET FOR 1992. THE COURT RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT THE WAGON TRAIN. THE COURT RE -CONVENED AT 1.30 P.M. AND CONTINUED THE BUDGET WORKSHOP UNTIL THEY RECESSED AT 3:45 P.M. REGULAR AUGUST TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS i COUNTY OF CALHOUN [ HELD AUGUST 12, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 12th day of August, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to - wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk (ABSENT) Stanley Mikula Helen J. Mikula Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk and the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. RESOLUTION - 4-H CLUB-W.E.T. WARRIORS A motion was made by Judge Howard Hartzog, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following Resolution be approved. • R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Calhoun County Commissioners' Court is proud to honor a group of young Texans for their participation in a valuable exchange program between the 4-H Clubs of Aransas, Calhoun, Matagorda and San Patricio counties and the Puget Sound Youth Leadership; and WHEREAS, in June, 1991, these 4-H members played host to 25 youngsters from the State of Washington, representing four counties and three Indian tribes, during a 3 l/2 day camp -out on Matagorda Island; and WHEREAS, on August loth, accompanied by County Marine Extension Agents Joe T. Surovik, Richard E. Tillman and William R. Younger, the Washington Exchange Trip (WET) Warriors, a delegation of 4-Hers ranging in age from 13 to 16 years, will depart for Port Townsend, located on the Olympic Peninsula in the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, a major focus of the Qroject, which stresses the importance of streams and rivers by teaching that everybody is downstream from something, is on the essential similarities between marine systems as seemingly different as the Texas Gulf Coast and Puget Sound; and WHEREAS, the W. E. T. Warriors will tour fisheries and museums, learn about salmon fishing and habitats, and make a special visit to British Columbia; and WHEREAS, the W. E. T. Warriors include Desiree Andresen, Jason Baca, Sabrina Butler, Jeff Mallard, Jennifer Pustka, Stephanie Pustka, Katie Stauber, Matt Younger and Sam Younger of Bay City; Matt Hansen of Blessing; Leslie Casterline of Fulton; Robert Barnebey, Jarod Camehl, Billy Miller, Andy Naquin, Clay Pettit, Stormy Reeves, Jason Talley and [feather Talley of.Rockport; Robert Douglas, Teresa Douglas, Justin Harkey, Kim Parrish and Shannon Shafer of Port Lavaca; Bradley Thedin, Emory Wolfe, and Mark Wolfe of Taft; and James Gernand and Tiffany Gernand of Van Vleck; and WHEREAS, constantly striving to increase their knowledge and better •prepare themselves to become the leaders of tomorrow, the W. E. T. Warriors personify the inquisitive, adventurous spirit of 4-H, and their commendable dedication and hard work are indeed deserving of special legislative recognition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County hereby honor the W..E. T. Warriors and extend to them best wishes for an enjoyable and enriching visit to Washington State and for success in all the years to come; AND; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that official copies of this Resolution be prepared for the W. E. T. Warriors as an expression of high regard by the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County, Texas. COMMIS J5 Leroy By • S an ATTEST: Marlene TEXAS BYHe�it ,, C�, pct.3 BY scar Ham, co -Comm., Pct. 401 RESOLUTION - MYRTLE FOESTER WHITMIRE DIVISION OF ARANSAS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE A motion was made by Judge Hartzog, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and -carried that the-followizrg-Reso-i-ution-be adopted. RESOLUTION RANCHO LA BAHIA IN SUPPORT OF AMENDMENT TO H.R. 2105 WHEREAS, Myrtle Foester Whitmire has conveyed the area in Calhoun County, Texas, commonly known as Rancho La Bahia, to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service; and WHEREAS, Myrtle Foester Whitmire has by this action demonstrated her concern for future generations by. assuring that this area, which includes some of the finest wetlands in the state of Texas, is preserved; and WHEREAS, U. S. Representative Greg Laughlin has introduced an amendment to House Resolution 2105 that would designate this area as the Myrtle Foester Whitmire Division of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County, Texas, supports the naming of this area the Myrtle Foester Whitmire Division of the Aransas • National Wildlife Refuge and does offer its gratitude to Mrs. Whitmire for her concern for the preservation of wildlife for the benefit of the people of the United States. 4' .. ..45, Tu..- ATTEST: MdA A Marlene Pau , callioUn County C er COUNTY, TEXAS 40'6 GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY -PERMITS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that Calhoun County grant a permit to GBRA to install facilities as shown on the following instruments with the understanding that by the usage of such permit GBRA agrees that such facilities and the installation, maintenance and usage thereof shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions set out in the original contract between GBRA and Calhoun County dated March 21, 1972 and recorded in Vol. R, Page 307 of the Commissioners' Court Minutes of Calhoun County, Texas and that GBRA agrees to be • bound by all such terms and provisions. SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION r � U CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM \ 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 8/1/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Robert Crawford C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D13 E. Customer Number to be assigned:17-2710 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 4�`7 eol,e, 4 UrQ,,o -fv r ct 4)z /7 - 27/0 P -. DO AL AMD BEACH 40)8 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) • A. DATE: 5/20/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: E. Philip Cannon C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: 120C 8O2OA E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2698 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 4�►9 0 r m U) m m 16rN I /SrH G'-B30' 44-� Pf ,; y 0anor7 zo- 26 9'? f koz.oc. 3 a z .i m m • C� .410 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM L 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) • A. DATE: 7/5/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: James Helm C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: 020D E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2709 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date. B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 411 OFlmes rreLm -t� 26- 2 70 9 RT %D20D • L &T d� 95' ill ,4 1624 • _ — � an H. o e 75401 H 2afereo I „ IF 842�i J. Swoboda U1 �a695 626 l S. L. Kennedy I o nm 20 �to n a O NO R La rI 2 I 7460 fi G Allen 1, 835• G L. Gandy 1101777 I` I; C d A. Bishop 1i0643 • za9g T H z� 74401 M. Perkins I O I G , �m 60901 G. Whitcomb IN I- 1 INDEMNITY AGREEMENT- CALHOUN COUNTY & MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TRUSTEES A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Court approve the Indemnity Agreement to be signed by Calhoun County and the Board of Trustees Memorial Medical Center and the Administrator and the County Judge be authorized to sign the same. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN INDEMNITY AGREEMENT Agreement made on the day of , 1991, between CALHOUN COUNTY, 211 S. Ann, Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas 77979, referred to as Indemnitor, and MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Board of Trustees, individually named as Mr. R. E. Clegg, Mr. Ervin Hermes, Mr. Jack Wu, • Ms. Betsy Wilson, Mr. Rolando Reyes, Ms. Jewell Fisher, and Mr. John Hayes, Administrator, all of Calhoun County, Texas, referred to hereinafter as Indemnitees. In consideration of the sum of One and No/100 Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, it is hereby agreed: SECTION ONE LIABILITY, LOSS OR DAMAGE Indemnitor shall indemnify each Indemnitee who is a party or is notified of the possibility of being made a party to any anticipated, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative (all such actions, suits, and proceedings and accompanying modifiers being comprehended by the term • "Proceeding"), by reason of the fact that said any Indemnitee was acting in his or her capacity as a Trustee or officer of Page 1 of 4 413 • the Memorial Medical Center, or was serving at the request of the Memorial Medical Center Board of Directors or Indemnitor as a director, officer, or trustee. Such indemnifications will be made only against actual damages awarded against indemnitees if the damages result from an act or omission of an Indemnitee in the course and scope of his or her employment with Indemnitor and arise from a cause of action for negligence. Such indemnification will also include court costs and attorney's fees awarded against an Indemnitee for whom damages are paid under this Indemnity Agreement. This Agreement does not cover damages against any indemnitee that arise from a cause of action for official misconduct; or arise • from a cause of action involving a willful or wrongful act or omission or an act or omission constituting gross negligence. The Indemnitor will not pay damages awarded against indemnitees to the extent that the damages are recoverable under an insurance contract or a self-insurance plan authorized by statute. Maximum indemnification by the County will not exceed $100,000.00 to any one person or $300,000.00 for any single occurrence in the case of personal injury or death or $10,000.00 for a single occurrence of property damage, unless otherwise authorized by statute. Page 2 of 4 • �.. 414 • C J • SECTION TWO Indemnity under this agreement shall commence on the ice_. day of , 1991, and shall continue in full force until the ja t4' day of 199A SECTION THREE REQUIREMENT OF NOTICE TO INDEMNITOR Each indemnitee agrees to notify Indemnitor in writing, within Z6 days, by registered mail, at Indemnitor's address as stated in this agreement, of any claim made against Indemnitees on the obligations indemnified against. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement at Port Lavaca, Texas, this the %A a day of County Judge Page 3 of 4 p1�_ NDO S ERVIN HERMES ALEX HERNANDEZ, or his duly appointed successor Page 4 of 4 • • • -416 RESOLUTION-1989 TAX ABATEMENT AMENDMENT -FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP.,TEXAS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court adopt the Resolution amending the 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement between Calhoun County, Texas and Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas. AMENDED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT-CALHOUN COUNTY h FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP., A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Amended Tax Abatement Agreement, • Amending the May 31, 1989 agreement, be approved. 16 AMENDED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT between CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS and FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS AUGUST 12, 1991 t_. 417 AMENDED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT INDEX. RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT 1. 1.3 Property Eligible for Tax Abatement . . . 2. Rind, Number and Location of Improvements . . . . . . 3. Inspection of Premises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Limitation of Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Right of Recapture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Existing Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Proposed Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. Cost of Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Value to be Abated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1. Base Year Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.2. Limitation on Amount of Abatement . . . . 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 _ 10. Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 11. Percent of Exemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 11.1. Years One and Two . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 11.2. Variance in Percent of Abatement . . . . . . 6 11.3 Abatement Subject To Rights Of Holders Of Outstanding Bonds . . . . . . . . . . 7 12. Reduction for Closure, Curtailment etc of Existing Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 13. Commencement and Termination Dates . . . . . . . . . . . 8 14. Description of Project/Economic Life . . . . . . . . . . 9 15. Default, Notice, Cure, Termination, Etc . . . . . . . . 9 15.1. Events of Default . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 15.2. Termination Retroactive . . . . . . . . . 11 15.3. Non Waiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 15.4. Recapture of Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 15.5. Administration and Enforcement . . . . . . 11 11 • 418 15.6. Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 16. Type of Legal Entity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 • 17. Notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 18. Reimbursement for Fees and Expenses . . . . . . . . . 13 19. Indemnity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 20. Incontestability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 21. Assurances and Special Conditions . . . . . . . . . . 15 21.1. Accuracy of Information . . . . . . . . . 15 21.2. Authority to Sign . . . . . . . . 15 21.3. Commencement of Construction . . . . . . . 16 21.4. Permits . . . . 16 21.5. All Conditions to be Performed 16 21.6. Public Health and Safety . . . . . 16 21.7. Required to Make Specific Improvements . . . . . . . . . 16 21.8. Estimates/Strict Compliance . . . . . . . 17 21.9. Enforcement of Environmental/Safety Provisions . . . 17 22. Information to Determine Compliance . . . . . . . . . 18 23. Value of Proiect After Abatement . . . . . . . . . . . 18 24. Contract Terms and Conditions Survive Abatement • Period 19 25. Miscellaneous - 19 25.1. Agreement Survives Reinvestment Zone . . . 19 25.2. Payment of Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 25.3. Conflicts of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 25.4. Severability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 25.5. Subtitles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 25.6. Place of Performance . . . . . . . . . . . 21 25.7. Acceptance by Formosa . . . . . . . . . . 21 25.8. Approval by Commissioner . . . . . . . . . 21 25.9. Binding Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 ii r1 419 • I— RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on May 31, 1989 Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas obtained designation of Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone 1989, consisting of certain properties situated i in an unincorporated area of Calhoun County, Texas; and WHEREAS, on May 31, 1989, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas was granted a Tax Abatement Agreement by Calhoun County for I eligible properties, designated as its Ethylene Complex Expansion Project, located within the reinvestment zone; and i WHEREAS, by 'application dated July 3, 1991 Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas has applied for amendments to its May • 31, 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement with the County; and WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas held a public hearing on July 23, 1991 at which interested persons were permitted to speak and present written material for or against the approval of an Amended Tax Abatement Agreement sought by Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas; and WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, after notice as required by law, has in open meeting discussed the issue of whether to enter into an Amended Tax Abatement Agreement with Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, and being of the opinion that the Application to amend the 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement by Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas for it Ethylene Complex Expansion Project should be approved, the Commissioners Court, upon motion and second, adopts the following resolutions: iii 420 BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas • hereby finds that the terms of the proposed amendments to the May 31, 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement for Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas' Ethylene Complex Expansion Project and the property subject to the Agreement satisfy eligibility criteria and other requirements of the Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement heretofore adopted by the Commissioners Court on May 18, 1990. 2. The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas finds that there will be no substantial adverse effect on the provision of the county's services or tax base. 3. The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas approves Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, application to amend its May 31, 1989 Tax Abatement Agreement, subject to the following terms, covenants and conditions contained in the attached Amended • Tax Abatement Agreement. 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas hereby approves and authorizes the execution of the Amended Tax Abatement Agreement between the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas and Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution, incorporated by reference, and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. iv • �.. 421 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED, by a vote of 4 for and Qagainst on this day - ATTEST: j2 Mar ne Paul, County C rk of (,['�(,t4�fv' _ , 1991. COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS By: wa d G. WrfzogCounty Judge v C� • • 422 AMENDED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT • THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF CALHOUN § THIS AMENDED AGREEMENT (hereinafter Agreement) is between Calhoun County, Texas, (hereinafter County), a political subdivision of the Sate of Texas, acting by and through its duly elected Commissioners Court (hereinafter Commissioners), and Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, a Delaware Corporation, with a certificate of authority to do business in Texas, with a place of business in Calhoun County, Texas (hereinafter Formosa). 1. Application/Specific Improvements Required. Formosa has filed with the County an Application to amend its May 31, 1989 _ Tax Abatement Agreement (hereinafter Original Agreement) which • agreement is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. A copy of the application to amend the original agreement, dated July 3, 1991 is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part hereof for any and purposes. This Agreement, unless otherwise expressly stated, supplants and replaces the Original Agreement effective immediately upon execution of this Agreement. Except for the requested amendments regarding the nature and extent of the improvements to be made, the total cost of project and total number of jobs generated, all other statements and representations made in the original application dated April 21, 1989 are hereby incorporated 1 • 423 by reference and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. 1.1 Amendments/Specific Improvements Required. The County hereby approves the Application to amend the Original Agreement by deleting from the specific improvements required the Aromatics Plant and the Styrene Monomer Plant. This Amended Tax Abatement Agreement is made expressly upon the condition that Formosa will make the specific improvements described in paragraph 1 of the Application to amend the original Agreement. _ Specifically, the plants that are.either in the process of being constructed, or to be constructed as described in the application for the original agreement shall include the following: Nature of Plant/Facility Cost (a) Olefins $295,000,000.00 • (b) Caustic/Chlorine $230,000,000.00 (c) Utilities $140,000,000.00 (d) Ethylene Glycol $150,000,000.00 (e) High Density Polyethylene $ 70,000,000.00 (f) Polypropylene $ 90,000,000.00 (g) Ethylene Dichloride $ 25,000,000.00 (h) Buildings & Transportation Facilities $ 25,000,000.00 TOTAL $1,025,000,000.00 . All of the proposed eligible improvements are to be located in the designated Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone, 1989. 1.2 Agreement Governed by Guidelines. Unless otherwise stated, this Agreement for Tax Abatement is made and entered into pursuant to and is governed by the Guidelines and Criteria of the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas for Granting Tax Abatement in Reinvestment Zones created in Calhoun County, Texas adopted May 18, 1990 (hereinafter "Guidelines") except as varied by • 2 s. _ 424 the specific provisions of this Agreement and by the Commissionerso enabling resolution. The 1988 Amended Guidelines and Criteria • adopted by the County, except as otherwise expressly noted in the original Agreement, govern the original Agreement and performance thereunder until the effective date of this Agreement. Both the 1988 Amended Guidelines and the 1990 Guidelines are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. Subject to any variances contained in this Agreement, and unless expressly stated that any provision in the 1988 Amended Guidelines applies to this Agreement, the 1990 Guidelines govern this Agreement. This Agreement is further subject to the following terms, covenants and conditions. 1.3 Property Eligible for Tax Abatement. The County agrees to exempt from taxation the percentages of value of the real property in each year covered by this agreement only to the extent • its value for that year exceeds its value for the year in which this agreement is executed. The County also agrees to exempt the value of tangible personal property located on real property in the reinvestment zone in each year covered by this agreement other than tangible personal property that was located in the reinvestment zone at any time before the period covered by the original or this agreement with the County. The variances requested in percent and length of exemption in the original application are granted to the extent as stated in paragraph 11 in this agreement. Tangible personal property that is not eligible for abatement is described in Section 2(g) of the Guidelines and 3 C J 425 I • Criteria. i 2. Rind. Number and Location of Improvements. -The kind, number and location of all proposed improvements of the property subject to this Agreement are as contained in Paragraph No. 1 of i the Application and exhibit attached thereto. (See Exhibit "A") — 3. Inspection of Premises. Formosa hereby expressly agrees to provide access to and authorize inspection of its property by County officials, employees, and/or their designees to insure that the improvements described in the Application are made according to the specifications and conditions stated in the Application and this Agreement, and that Formosa is complying with the Agreement. — 4. Limitation • of use. Formosa shall not make any use of the property that is inconsistent with the general purpose of encouraging development or redevelopment of the reinvestment zone -- during the period that the property tax exemptions are in effect. 5. Right of Recapture. The County shall be entitled to recapture all property tax revenue lost as a result of this i agreement, if Formosa fails to make the improvements or repairs as provided by this agreement, and the application attached hereto, or - in the event of other specified defaults, after notice and failure to cure, all as more particularly provided in paragraph 15 of this agreement. 6. Existing Uses. A map showing existing uses and conditions of the real property in the reinvestment zone is attached to the Application. • 4 426 7. Proposed Uses. A map showing proposed improvements and uses in the reinvestment zone is attached to the Application. • a. Cost of Project. The estimated cost of the project as described in the Application is $1,025,000,000.00. It is estimated that 850 new permanent jobs will be created as a result of the new or expanded facilities. Substantial compliance with these estimates will be acceptable. Substantial compliance means within 90% of any authorized estimate. 9. Value to be Abated. The estimated value to be abated for each year of the abatement period is as follows: Date 8 of Completion Value 9.01 January 1, 1990 -0- -0- 9.02 January 1, 1991 21% $ 215,250,000.00 9.03 January 1, 1992 50% $ 512,500,000.00 9.04 January 1, 1993 85% $ 871,250,000.00 • 9.05 January 1, 1994 100% $1,025,000,000.00 9.06 January 1, 1995 and January 1, 1996 100% $1,025,000,000.00 (subject to allowable depreciation) 9.1. Base Year Value. The base year value (January 1, 1989) was $119,675,400.00 land value and improvements. 9.2. Limitation on Amount of Abatement. If the value of an existing facility will be deleted or diminished as a result of the project, the eligible value of the project to be abated will be limited to the difference between the cost of the project and the appraised value of the existing facility that is to be deleted or 5 42') n LJ reduced as a result of the project. 10. Duration. The duration of the abatement term shall be seven (7) years commencing within the tax year 1990, through the tax year 1996, inclusive. 11. Percent of Exemption. The percent of value to be abated each year is as follows: 11.1. Years One and Two. 100% of the value of the new eligible properties described in the Application shall be abated each year for the first two years. 11.2. Variance in Percent of Abatement. The County hereby grants a variance from its April 15, 1988 Amended Guidelines with regard to the percent of abatement in years three through • seven as follows: 11.21. variance in Base Abatement, Years Three through Seven. 851 of the value of the new eligible properties described in the Application shall be abated during years three through seven. 11.22. Additional Abatement - Residency Incentive. For each preceding year during years three through seven that out of the new jobs created as a result of the project, if 35% or more of - the permanent employees of the project reside in Calhoun County, Formosa shall be entitled to an additional 15% abatement. In order to qualify for the residency incentive, Formosa must prove to the satisfaction of the County, or its designee, for each year in which the residency incentive is sought, that for the immediate preceding calendar year on a yearly average 35% of the employees hired after 0 428 April 21, 1989, as a result of the project lived in Calhoun County. For purposes of the residency incentive, the new employees must be • permanent employees, who either directly or indirectly are working at the new project, or are replacing an existing employee in an unrelated job who has been transferred to the new project. Temporary or construction workers employed during the construction phase of the project shall not be considered for the residency incentive. New employees of a permanent contract labor force that are hired as a direct result of the project, and who are permanent, shall count in determining whether the residency incentive has been satisfied. The new permanent employees who are hired as a result of the project are only eligible in the employee count if they are hired after April 21, 1989. Each year the residency incentive applies, the employee count will be cumulative of all eligible employees hired on or after April 21, 1989 and still employed at • the project at the time the count is made. 11.3 Abatement Subiect To Rights Of Holders Of outstanding Bonds. Pursuant to Tex. Tax Code §312.204(a), the abatement and exemption of taxes provided in this agreement is subject to the rights of holders of outstanding bonds of the county. 12. Reduction for Closure Curtailment etc of Existino Facilities. If, after the effective date of the original tax abatement agreement and during the term of the abatement period, Formosa should close, cease production, or demolish any or all of a facility that was in existence on the effective date of the 7 • 429 r- • original tax abatement agreement, or take any other similar action that would have the effect of reducing or deleting the value of the facility, or portion thereof from the tax rolls that was in existence on the effective date of the original tax abatement agreement, regardless of the reason, then for the remaining term of the tax abatement agreement, the eligible value for abatement allowed in this tax abatement agreement shall be reduced by the amount of existing property value owned by the Taxpayer that is reduced or deleted from the tax roll. Depreciation, agreed to by the Chief Appraiser, or Appraisal Review Board, shall not be construed as a reduction or deletion of value for purposes of this limitation. 13. Commencement and Termination Dates. The effective • date of this amended tax abatement agreement shall be the date that the County executes this amended tax abatement agreement with iFormosa Plastics Corporation, Texas. The abatement granted in the original agreement and this agreement shall apply to all eligible - improvements placed in the reinvestment zone after April 21, 1989. Taxes will be abated on eligible property for seven (7) consecutive tax years commencing January 1, 1990. Property otherwise eligible for tax abatement under this agreement shall be eligible for abatement only if the property is placed or constructed in the I reinvestment zone after the date of the original application, but I on or before December 31, 1995. Taxes will be abated for eligible property in tax years 1990 through 1996, inclusive. 8 430 14. Description of Project/Economic Life The facilities designated in the Application to amend are part of • Formosa's chemical manufacturing process at its Point Comfort Plant and specifically are identified as the Ethylene Complex Expansion Project with an economic life of at least 21 years. The nature of the construction is more completely described in the original Application and the application to amend. Construction started after April 21, 1989 and completion of construction is estimated to occur in 1993. A complete property description is contained in the original Application and is amended in the 1991 application. 15. Default, Notice, Cure Termination Etc Should the County determine that Formosa is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the County shall notify Formosa in writing at the address stated in this Agreement, and if such default is not cured within 60 days from the date of • written notice, or within an approved extended curative time as authorized by g7(a) of the County+s Guidelines, this Agreement may be terminated by the Commissioners for cause. 15.1. Events of Default. The following shall be considered events of default, should Formosa: 15.11 Allow any of its ad valorem taxes owed to the County to become delinquent without timely and proper protest and/or contest; or 15.12. Violate any of the terms and conditions of this or any other abatement agreement with the County or with any other 0 • 431. n LJ taxing jurisdiction that has granted Formosa tax abatement for any project that the County has also granted tax abatement; or 15.13. Discontinue producing the product or service described in the Application for any reason excepting fire, explosion or other casualty or accident or natural disaster for a period of one year during the abatement period after the facility is completed and begins producing the product or service; or 15.14. Violate any written term, covenant, condition, agreement, or promise of gift or donation made by Formosa to the County, • although such may be extraneous to this Agreement, and even though same may be -- otherwise unenforceable; or 15.15. Make any material misrepresentation, or omit any material fact either in the application or in the amended tax abatement agreement. (Material Misrepresentation or omission of a material fact means a false statement or omission about a material matter which induced the Commissioners to take any specific action on the application for tax abatement, and without such misrepresentation, the Commissioners would not have granted this • 10 432 amended tax abatement agreement, or would have • taken some action different than they actually did. 15.2. Termination Retroactive. Termination of the Tax Abatement Agreement for cause shall be retroactive to the effective date of the original Agreement. Termination shall be effected by resolution of the Commissioners and written notice of termination shall be mailed to Formosa. 15.3. Non Waiver. In the event the County fails to act on or enforce any element or breach that is identified as a default, such failure to act shall not be a waiver of the county's right to subsequently enforce the same default or any other prior or subsequent default. 15.4. Recapture of Taxes. on termination for cause, Formosa shall then become liable for the payment of all taxes that would have otherwise become due but for the original and this Amended Abatement Agreement for all calendar years during which the original and Amended Abatement Agreements were in effect. Such taxes shall be paid to the Calhoun County Appraisal District to the credit of the County within 60 days from the date of receipt of notice of termination. All such taxes shall include statutory penalty and interest from the date they would otherwise have become delinquent, as if they had not been abated, until the date they are actually paid. 15.5. Administration and Enforcement. The administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall be in 11 433 - accordance with the terms contained herein and the Guidelines as • adopted by the Commissioners on May 18, 1990. In the event of any conflict in the terms of this Agreement and the Guidelines adopted by the Commissioners, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail, unless prohibited by law, then the Guidelines adopted by the Commissioners and their provisions shall prevail. 15.6. Assignment. This Amended Agreement may not be assigned, either in whole or part, without the express written consent of County. Any assignment is subject to the conditions contained in the Guidelines and this Agreement. Any attempt to assign this Agreement, except as provided herein, shall be null and void. 16. Type of Legal Entity Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas is a corporation, duly organized, validly existing, • incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, and in good standing. Formosa is duly qualified and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas and has all requisite power and authority to own and operate properties and to carry on its business as now being or intended to be conducted. The name and address of the registered agent for service in Texas is: C. T. Corporation System 1601 Elm Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Formosa shall notify the County within 60 days of any change in the registered agent or status of the Corporation. 17. Notices. Any notices required to be given hereunder, shall be given in writing as follows: 12 C� 434 (a) county: • County Judge Calhoun County Courthouse 211 S. Ann Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 (b) FORMOSA: Jack Wu, Agent and Attorney in Fact Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas P. O. Box 700 Point Comfort, Texas 77978 18. Reimbursement for Fees and Expenses. Within 30 days from receipt of written notice, Formosa will reimburse the County for any expenses, directly or indirectly incurred by the County for processing and approving the Application to amend its Tax Abatement, preparation and presentation of the Amended Tax Abatement Agreement, and any other expenses reasonably incurred by the County in any way related thereto, including all expenses that is may be incurred in enforcing or defending any term, covenant or condition contained in the original or this Amended Agreement. In the event the County orders a feasibility study of the impact of the Formosa Project on the county during the term of this agreement, Formosa shall reimburse the County in accordance with the reimbursement procedure for the other expenses listed above. 19. Indemnity. Formosa hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the County, each of its elected officials, all of its servants, agents and employees, and any designee (a person or legal entity designated to perform any function required under the County's Guidelines, or under the original tax abatement application, the application to amend, or by the terms of the 13 _ 435 original or this amended tax abatement agreement) and the Calhoun. • County Appraisal District, its officers, directors, servants, agents and employees from the amounts of any and all liabilities, claims, costs, judgements, penalties, interest, court costs and attorney fees incurred by the County, each of its elected ,— officials, all of its servants, agents and employees, or any designee, and the Calhoun County Appraisal District, its officers, directors, servants, agents and employees in defense of any claims occurring out of or in any way incident to processing the application, or any other claim arising out of or incident to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in the original or this i amended tax abatement agreement, or arising out of or in connection with the reinvestment zone, or the project subject to abatement. is20. Incontestability. At the option of the County, this Agreement may be terminated, and all taxes that would have otherwise been due but for this Abatement Agreement will become due and payable within 60 days from date of written notice of the amounts due and owing, including penalty and interest as provided in paragraph 15 of this Agreement if any of the following events occur: (a) If Formosa should contest any term, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement, or attempt to prevent, or negate the enforceability of any of such terms, covenants or conditions; or (b) If any third party, firm, corporation or other legal entity should contest any term, covenant or condition contained in • 14 this Agreement, and prevent or negate the enforceability of any of • such terms, by final in covenants or conditions judgment a court of competent jurisdiction; or (c) If any governmental agency should contest any term, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement, and either by enforceable regulatory order, or by final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction prevent or negate the enforceability of any of such terms, covenants or conditions. 21. Assurances and special Conditions. The County and Formosa agree that the following assurances, promises and conditions are made by Formosa expressly to induce the County to grant this amended tax abatement agreement and that without such assurances, promises and conditions the County would not have granted the original or this amended tax abatement agreement. • Formosa hereby expressly makes and agrees to be bound by the following representations, assurances, promises and conditions: 21.1. Accuracy of information. That all information contained in Formosans application and furnished to the County for incorporation in this tax abatement agreement is true, complete and correct. • 21.2. Authority to Sion. That the person who signed the application to amend the agreement on behalf of Formosa had unrestricted authority to execute the application, and that the person signing this contract document on behalf of Formosa has the unrestricted authority to obligate Formosa to all the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this amended tax abatement 15 437 n agreement. By acceptance of any of the benefits provided hereunder, Formosa has authorized the execution and delivery of this Amended Agreement and represents that it is enforceable against Formosa in accordance with the terms of this Amended I^ Agreement. — 21.3. Commencement of Construction. That construction did not commence on any of the eligible improvements until after the original tax abatement application was filed with the County on April 21, 1989. 21.4. Permits. That the project described in the r amended application, and this amended tax abatement agreement will I not be constructed without first obtaining all necessary local, state and federal environmental and construction permits, and that Formosa will abide by all conditions of the permits, laws and ordinances, rules and regulations governing the construction and operation of the project throughout its economic life. 21.5. All Conditions to be Performed. That Formosa will abide by all conditions of this tax abatement agreement and the Guidelines adopted by the Commissioners applicable to this agreement. - 21.6. Public Health and Safety. That the planned use of the property will not constitute a hazard to public health or safety throughout the economic life of the project. 21.7. Required to Make Specific Improvements That Formosa will make the specific improvements to the property as described in its application to amend. (See Exhibit "A") 16 • • • 43g • 21.8. Estimates/Strict Compliance. Estimates of the cost and value of the project and the number of jobs retained or created as a result of the project that are within 90% of actual cost, value and number of jobs may be construed to be substantial compliance. Unless estimates are expressly authorized, strict compliance is required. 21.9. Enforcement of Environmental/safety Provisions. In the event Formosa is fined, or assessed a penalty by the Texas Air Control Board, Texas Water Commission, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, or any successor thereto, or by a court of competent jurisdiction for violation of any of its permits, any regulatory rule or regulation, or local, state or federal law, regulation or ordinance promulgated or enforced by the Texas Air Control Board, Texas Water Commission, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, or any successor thereto governing or regulating the construction or operation of the project that is the subject of this or any other abatement agreement between the County and Formosa, executed either prior or subsequent to this agreement or if by agreement, compromise or settlement Formosa pays a fine, penalty or payment of any nature related to any alleged violation for any of the foregoing, then in such event Formosa shall pay the County an amount of money equivalent to the amount of the fine, penalty or payment as an unrestricted donation to the County. Formosa shall notify the County within 30 days after any such fine, penalty or payment is assessed against it relating to the 40 construction or operation of any portion or component of the 17 4V9 project subject to this or any other Abatement Agreement between • Formosa and the County. The amounts due the County under this paragraph shall be payable annually on or before January 31st for all such fines or penalties assessed against Formosa or payments made to such agencies to settle alleged violations in the immediate preceding calendar year. This covenant shall remain in effect throughout the economic life of the projects. Formosa and the County have a similar provision to this paragraph 21.9 in their tax abatement agreement for a $200,000,000.00 project executed on even date herewith. The County shall be paid one time annually for all fines, penalties, or settlement payments paid to Texas Air Control Board, Texas Water Commission, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency or their successors, for the preceding year. The inclusion of a similar provision in the $200,000,000.00 abatement agreement • shall never be construed to require Formosa to pay to the county double the amount of all fines, penalties or settlement payments described above. 22. information to Determine Compliance Formosa covenants and agrees to provide within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days after written request, such information as may be required by the County or its designee, in order to determine compliance on Formosals part of the terms of this tax abatement agreement. 23. Value of Project After Abatement The estimated value of the eligible property that is being abated will be $1,005,000,000.00 on January 1, 1997. 18 • 440 24. Contract Terms and Conditions Survive Abatement Period. Unless sooner terminated under other provisions hereunder, • all other rights, duties and obligations contained in this Amended Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until all taxes levied in each of the seven (7) years in which an exemption applied under the original and this Amended Agreement are fully paid by Formosa, and all other covenants and conditions have been fulfilled. Provided, however, that no extension of the abatement period shall occur as a result of this Agreement beyond the 1996 tax year, it being the intent of the parties that seven (7) years is the limit of abatement granted. 25. Miscellaneous. The following additional provisions are included and are made express conditions of this tax abatement agreement in order to carry out the intent and purposes of the County's Guidelines, or to address any special problems or needs • arising out of the uniqueness of the project, the application, or Formosa: 25.1. Agreement Survives Reinvestment Zone It is specifically understood and agreed that the designation of the reinvestment zone in which the eligible property described in this Tax Abatement Agreement is located is valid for a period of five years from May 31, 1989, unless subsequently extended. The fact that the designation of the reinvestment zone may expire before this Agreement terminates shall not effect the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 19 CJ 441 25.2. Payment of Taxes. During the term of the original • and this Amended Agreement, Formosa's taxes shall be payable as follows: 25.21. The value of any ineligible property as described in Section 2(g) of the County's Guidelines adopted on May 18, 1990 shall be fully taxable. 25.22. The base year value of existing property as determined each year shall be fully taxable; and 25.23. The additional value of new eligible property in the reinvestment zone shall be taxable subject to the exemptions provided in Paragraph 11 above. 25.3. Conflicts of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State • of Texas, without regard to its conflicts of laws rule. 25.4. Severability. At the option of the County, the - invalidity of any one or more covenants, phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this agreement shall not affect the remaining portions of this agreement or any part hereof, and in case of any such invalidity, this amended agreement may be construed as if such invalid covenants, phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections were not included. 25.5. Subtitles. The use of subtitles in this Agreement is strictly for convenience, and shall have no legal significance whatsoever. The use of the singular shall include the plural and the use of plural shall include the singular when appropriate. The use of any reference to gender shall include any and all other • W 442 genders when appropriate. 25.6. Place of Performance. This Agreement, in its • entirety, shall be performable in Calhoun County, Texas. As part of the consideration for entering into this Agreement, both County and Formosa agree that any litigation to construe or enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be brought in the State Courts of Calhoun County, Texas. 25.7. Acceptance by Formosa. By acceptance of this Agreement and/or any benefits conferred hereunder, Formosa represents that its undersigned agent has complete and unrestricted authority to enter into this Amended Tax Abatement Agreement and to obligate and bind Formosa to all of the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. Formosa agrees to be bound by all assurances and commitments contained in the original application as amended by the application dated July 3, 1991, the • Guidelines and Criteria as applicable, and the specific terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Amended Tax Abatement Agreement. 25.8. Approval by Commissioners. This Amended Agreement, in its entirety, including authority to execute it in this form, has been approved by the Commissioners, in a regular meeting of the Commissioners, after due notice as required by law, and pursuant to Resolution duly adopted by the Commissioners by at least a three -fourths vote of the Commissioners. 25.9. Binding Effect. This Agreement, in its entirety, shall be binding upon all the parties hereto, their respective 21 443 successors and/or assigns. EXECUTED IN MULTIPLE ORIGINALS on the 1,2,Lk day of August, 1991, to be effective immediately. COUNTY: COMMISSIONERS COURT / CALHOUN COUFY, TEXAS / og," Canty Judge ATTEST: Rarldne Paul, County Clerk • FORMOSA: FORMOSA PLASTICS C7O�RPORATION, TEXAS By: Jack Wb, Agent and Attorney in Fact (Power of Attorney attached) 22 • 444 E • T 930-v. -, f Au er: nre a:xa-e I � rt r r r r n r• r Thst7, FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS as principal residing at 9 Peach Tree Hill Road, Livingston, Essex County, New Jersey (07039) sometimes referred to as "I" or "my" do hereby constitute and appoint, JACK WU, an individual, sometimes referred to as "You" residingat 201 Formosa Avenue, Point Comfort, Calhoun County, Texas (77978) my true and lawful attorney for me, and in my name, place and stead, to do each and every act which I could personally do for the following uses and purposes: 1. To make, execute and deliver that certain TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT between FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS and the COUNTY OF CALHOUN, TEXAS regarding the "$1,025,000,000.00 Ethylene Complex Expansion Project" (copy of which is annexed hereto and hereby made a part hereof) upon such terms and provisions and subject to such conditions as You shall deem proper and appropriate. 2. Generally, to do, execute and perform any other act, matter or thing whatsoever, that, in your opinion, ought to be done, executed and performed in connection with the foregoing matter, as I could do if personally present to effectuate the action and actions contemplated giving and granting unto my said attorney full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and pur- poses as I might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution and revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my said attorney or substitute shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. and I ratify all that which You have done on my;behalf,,.all,in • reference to the effectuating of the fb'rPgo 11g;and only. -with respect thereto. " ` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, / have hereunto set mMhnseal on US t 2 19?1 LAS OR ION, TEXAS Sealed and Delivered in thePresence of By :._..._.......... .. .. ......:................... .... ............ c....._ CHARLES H. MCAULI}. Vice President and Secretary N H. ROSS *If you want this power to continue in effect if you become disabled or incapacitated, insert the following: "This power of attorney shall not be affected by my becoming disabled or incapacitated." -If you want this power to become effective only in the event of subsequent disability or incapacity, insert the following: "This power of attorney shh become effec .i e i the event of my subsequent disability or incapacity." see NJS 46:2BP PREPARED reverse side ./dJ ' �// PREPARED BY ..(((LLLggg.(4CCCiieee )V_ CHARLES H. McAULIFFE AN ATTORNEY -AT -LAW OF THE STATE. OF NEW JERSEY 445 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ( COUNTYOF ESSEX f ss.: BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 2nd day of August , 1991 , before me, the subscriber,a Notary Public State of New Jersey, personally appeared CHARLES H. McAULIFFE who, I am satisfied, is the principal mentioned in, and who executed the within power of attorney and ac• knowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered the same as h is act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein expressed. of this Corporation, • NOTARY PUBLICC ANN 1L nM a"Rl/IKOF#JEWA SEy my den bob" Om 141"2 z H � t 0 ~ O • d O U ` N � E F 3 w yF' 0 U _ ~' . tS1 vc N m 6 O 0 few u `m O I 46:28-8. Power of attorney unaffected by disability of principal according to its terms; accountability to guardian; _ disability da6ned a. Whenever a principal designates another his attorney in fan or agent by a power of attorney in writing and the writing contains the word,'"fhia power of attorney shall net be affected by. disability of the principal," or "This power of attorney shall become effective upon the disability of the principal." or similar words showing the intent of the principal that the authority conferred shall be exercisable notwithstanding his disability, the authority of the attorney in fact or agent is exercisable by him es provided in the power on behalf of the -- principal notwithateading later disability or incapacity of the principal at lawor later uncertainty as to whether the principal is dead or alive. All acts done by the attorney in fact or agent Pull uenl to the power during any period of disability or ;nnominty pmence or uacenaas to whether the principal is dead or alive have the same effecl end inureto the benefit of and bind the principal or his heirs, devisee and personal representative as if the principal were alive, competent and not disabled. If a guardian is appuinsed for the principal, the attorney in fact or Agent. during the continuance of the sppointment. shall account to the guardian ratber than the principal. The guardian has the • same power the principal would have had to revoke the power of attorney or agency. b. A principal shall be under a disability it he is unable to manage his property and affairs effectively for teeters such as mental Mesas, mental deficiency, physical illness or disability, advanced age, chronic use of drugs, chronic intoxication, confinement, detention by a foreign power, or disappearance. AN FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS P. O. BOX 100 PHONE: 512/987-7000 • 201 FORMOSA DRIVE FAX: 512/987-2721 POINT COMFORT, TEXAS 77978 July 3, 1991 The Honorable Howard Hartzog County Judge Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Re: Application to Amend Tax Abatement Agreement dated May 31, Dear Judge Hartzog: Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas hereby requests that the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas approve this application to amend the original tax abatement agreement granted by the Commissioners Court to Formosa Plastics Corporation dated May 31, 1989 in the following respects: 1. The original tax abatement agreement was for nine plants in the total project with a combined estimated cost of $1,700,000,000.0o. FPC has now determined that it will not build the Aromatics Plant at a cost of $260,000,000.00 nor will we build the Styrene Monomer Plant at a cost of $95,000,00o.00. The Shore Side Tank Farm described in the original agreement has been moved out of the County reinvestment zone to Point Comfort Reinvestment Zone No. 90-1. The County has granted a tax abatement agreement to FPC on the Storage Tank Farm and a Cryogenic Plant on August 27, 1990, based on an estimated value of $66,000,000.00. The estimated cost of the Tank Farm is $49,000,000.00. Facilities that have been deleted or moved that were included in the original cost of project estimates amount to reductions of $404,000,000.00, leaving a balance of cost of project as originally planned of $1,296,000,000.00. Due to over estimates and other adjustments, FPC, Texas estimates that the actual cost of the remaining original project is subject to further downward cost adjustment of $271,000,0o0-Oo, leaving the estimated cost of the project at $1,025,000,000.00, and consisting of the following: "A" 447 July 3, 1991 Page 2 ESTIMATED COST OF REMAINING UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION REINVESTMENT ZONE, 1989, AFTER DELETIONS AND COST ADJUSTMENTS: Olefins Caustic/Chlorine Utilities Ethylene Glycol High Density Polyethylene Polypropylene Ethylene Dichloride Buildings & Transportation Facilities TOTAL $295,000,000.00 $230,000,000.00 $140,000,000.00 $150,000,000.00 $ 70,000,000.00 $ 90,000,000.00 $ 25,000,000.00 $ 25,000,000.00 $1,025,000,000.00 The facilities in the County reinvestment zone have been relocated per attached plat, marked Exhibit "1". The original agreement needs to be amended to delete the facilities that have been dropped from the project or moved to the other reinvestment zone and to change the estimated cost of the project. 2. FPC, Texas further requests that the original agreement be amended to adjust the estimated number of permanent employees that the project, as amended, will have upon completion. The original application estimated that total permanent employment of the project to be 1500 employees. It is now estimated because of deletions and modifications that the plants described in paragraph 1 above in Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone, 1989 will have a total permanent employment compliment of 850 employees. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests that the County allow an amendment to the original agreement to change the number of estimated employees to 850. 3. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests that the original agreement between FPC and Calhoun County, Texas, acting by and through its Commissioners Court be amended for the foregoing reasons as follows: (1) To delete the facilities described in the original application that will not be constructed in Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone, 1989. (2) To reduce the estimated cost of the project from $1,700,000,000.00 to $1,025,000,000.00. I L • • 448 July 3, 1991 Page 3 • (3) To reduce the estimated permanent employment upon completion from 1500 to 850 employees. JW/ C E Respectfully submitted, FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS By: & e ? < JadK Wu, Agent and Attorney in Fact 449 Plat FPG-TEXAS EXPANSION PROJECT PLOT PLAN • C J 450 I • FRG -TEXAS LXPANbIWI PROJ ASMS COMYOPAMM lFlAi GIi GOYI01fi.TG ii�l� I ' I IGLU I PLAN ._..F PP -� RESOLUTION- TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT-CALHOUN COUNTY AND FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP. , TEXAS- EXPANSION A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court adopt the Resolution approving $200,000,000.00 Tax Abatement Agreement with Formosa Plastics Corp., Texas for the expansion of its Ethylene Complex Expansion Project. TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT-CALHOUN COUNTY AND FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP.,TEXAS A motion was made by Commissioner Smith seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Court approve the Tax Abatement Agreement between Calhoun County and Formosa Plastics Corp., Texas for the expansion of its Ethylene Complex Expansion Project. • n u TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT between CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS and FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS AUGUST 12, 1991 451 County.2 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT INDEX RESOLUTION APPROVING TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT . . . . . . . 1. iii 2 2. Hind, Number and Location of Improvements . . . . . . . . 3 3. Inspection of Premises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Limitation of Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Right of Recapture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6. Existing Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7. Proposed Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 8. Cost of Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9. Value to be Abated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9.1. Base Year Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9.2. Limitation on Amount of Abatement . . . . . . 4 10. Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 11. Percent of Exemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 11.1. Years One and Two . . . . . ... . . . . 5 11.2. Variance in Percent of Abatement . . . . 5 11.3 Abatement Subject To Rights Of Holders Of Outstanding Bonds . . . . . . . . . . 6 12. Reduction for Closure. Curtailment etc of Existing Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 13. Commencement and Termination Dates . . . . . . . . . . . 7 14. Description of Project/Economic Life . . . . . . . . . . 8 15. Default. Notice. Cure, Termination. Etc . . . . . . . . 8 15.1. Events of Default . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 15.2. Termination Retroactive . . . . . . . . . 10 15.3. Non Waiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 15.4. Recapture of Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 15.5. Administration and Enforcement . . . . . . 10 15.6. Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 16. Type of Legal Entity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 C� • • 452 County.2 C 21.9 22. 23. 24. 25. • r L J Notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reimbursement for Fees and Expenses Indemnity . . . . . . . . . . . . Incontestability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assurances and Special Conditions 21.1. Accuracy of Information . . . . . . . . . 21.2. Authority to Sign . . . . . . . . 21.3. Commencement of Construction . . . . . . . 21.4. Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.5. All Conditions to be Performed . . . . . . 21.6. Public Health and Safety . . . . . 21.7. Required to Make Specific Improvements . . . . . . . . . 21.8. Estimates/Strict Compliance . . . . . . . Enforcement of Environmental/Safety Provisions . . . Information to Determine Compliance . . . . . . . . . Value of Proiect After Abatement . . . . . . . . . . . Contract Terms and Conditions Survive Abatement Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miscellaneous . 25.1. Agreement Survives Reinvestment Zone . . . 25.2. Payment of Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.3. Conflicts of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.4. Severability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.5. Subtitles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.6. Place of Performance . . . . . . . . . . . 25.7. Acceptance by Formosa . . . . . . . . . . 25.8. Approval by Commissioner . . . . . . . . . 25.9. Binding Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii 12 12 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 453 County.2 RESOLUTION APPROVING TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT • WHEREAS, on May 31, 1989 Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas obtained designation of Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone 1989, consisting of certain properties situated in an unincorporated area of Calhoun County, Texas; and WHEREAS, by application dated July 3, 1991 Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas has applied for a Tax Abatement Agreement for $200,000,000.00 to be located in the Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone 1989; and WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas held a public hearing on July 23, 1991 at which interested persons were permitted to speak and present written material for or against the approval of the Tax Abatement Agreement sought by Formosa • Plastics Corporation, Texas; and WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, after notice as required by law, has in open meeting discussed the issue of whether to enter into a Tax Abatement Agreement with Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, and being of the opinion that the Application for Tax Abatement Agreement by Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas for expansion of its Ethylene Complex Expansion Project should be approved, the Commissioners Court, upon motion and second, adopts the following resolutions: BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas hereby finds that the terms of the proposed Tax Abatement Agreement for Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texasl expansion of its Ethylene • Complex Expansion Project and the property subject to the Agreement iii ME satisfy eligibility criteria and other requirements of the Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement heretofore adopted by the • Commissioners Court on May 18, 1990. 2. The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas finds that there will be no substantial adverse effect on the provision of the Countyls services or tax base. 3. The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas approves Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas' application for Tax Abatement Agreement dated July 3, 1991, subject to the following terms, covenants and conditions contained in the attached Tax Abatement Agreement. 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas hereby approves and authorizes the execution of the Tax Abatement Agreement between the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas and Formosa Plastics Corporation, • Texas, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution, incorporated by reference, and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED, by a vote of 'f for and d against on this _ZzL day of 1991. COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALHOUN CO NTY, TEXAS: By: "A le V ATTEST: o a HG. r H z , ounty Judge Marle a Paul, County Clerk ✓., iv I . 455 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF CALHOUN § THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter Agreement) is between Calhoun County, Texas, (hereinafter County), a political subdivision of the Sate of Texas, acting by and through its duly elected Commissioners Court (hereinafter Commissioners), and Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, a Delaware Corporation, with a certificate of authority to do business in Texas, with a place of business in Calhoun County, Texas (hereinafter Formosa). 1. Application/specific Improvements Required. Formosa has filed with the County an Application for Tax Abatement. A copy of the application, dated July 3, 1991 is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. 1.1 specific Improvements Required. The County hereby approves the Application for Tax Abatement Agreement expressly upon the condition that Formosa will make the specific improvements described in paragraph 1 a-e inclusive of the Application. All of the proposed eligible improvements. are to be located in the designated Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone, 1989. 1.2 Agreement Governed by Guidelines. Unless otherwise stated, this Agreement for Tax Abatement is made and entered into pursuant to and is governed by the Guidelines and Criteria of the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas for Granting Tax 1 • • �J 456 • r L_J Abatement in Reinvestment Zones created,in Calhoun County, Texas adopted May 18, 1990 (hereinafter "Guidelines") except as varied by the specific provisions of this Agreement and by the Commissioners, enabling resolution. The Guidelines are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. Subject to any variances contained in this Agreement, the 1990 Guidelines govern this Agreement. This Agreement is further subject to the following terms, covenants and conditions. 1.3 Property Eligible for Tax Abatement. The County agrees to exempt from taxation the percentages of value of the real property in each year covered by this agreement only to the extent its value for that year exceeds its value for the year in which this agreement is executed. The County also agrees to exempt the value of eligible tangible personal property described in the application located on real property in the reinvestment zone in each year covered by this agreement other than tangible personal property that was located in the reinvestment zone at any time before the execution of this agreement with the County. This provision shall not effect the eligibility for tax abatement of other improvements in the reinvestment zone as authorized by any prior agreements with the County. The variances requested in percent and length of exemption in the application are granted to the extent as stated in paragraph 11 in this agreement. Tangible personal property that is not eligible for abatement is described in Section 2(g) of the Guidelines and Criteria. VI 457 C1 2. Rind. Number and Location of Improvements. The kind, number and location of all proposed improvements of the property subject to this Agreement are as contained in Paragraph No. 1 a-e of the Application and exhibits attached thereto. (See Exhibit "A") 3. Inspection of Premises. Formosa hereby expressly agrees to provide access to and authorize inspection of its property by County officials, employees, and/or their designees to insure that the improvements described in the Application are made according to the specifications and conditions stated in the Application and this Agreement, and that Formosa is complying with the Agreement. 4. Limitation of Use. Formosa shall not make any use • of the property that is inconsistent with the general purpose of encouraging development or redevelopment of the reinvestment zone during the period that the property tax exemptions are in effect. 5. Right of Recapture. The County shall be entitled to recapture all property tax revenue lost as a result of this agreement, if Formosa fails to make the improvements or repairs as provided by this agreement, and the application attached hereto, or in the event of other specified defaults, after notice and failure to cure, all as more particularly provided in paragraph 15 of this agreement. 6. Existing Uses. A map showing existing uses and conditions of the real property in the reinvestment zone is attached to the Application. 3 • 458 C� • • 7. Proposed Uses. A map showing proposed improvements and uses in the reinvestment zone is attached to the Application. 8. Cost of Project. The estimated cost of the project as described in the Application is $200,000,000.00. It is estimated that 150 new permanent jobs will be created as a result of the new or expanded facilities. these estimates will be acceptable. Substantial compliance with Substantial compliance means within 90% of any authorized estimate. 9. Value to be Abated. The estimated value to be abated for each year of the abatement period is as follows: Date $ of completion Value 9.01 January 1, 1992 -0- -0- 9.02 January 1, 1993 50% $ 100,000,000.00 9.03 January 1, 1994 100% $ 200,000,000.00 9.04 January 1, 1995 through January 1, 1998 100% $ 200,000,000.00 (subject to allowable depreciation) 9.1. Base Year Value. The base year value (January 1, 1991) was $323,805,400.00 land value and improvements. 9.2. Limitation on Amount of Abatement. If the value of an existing facility will be deleted or diminished as a result of the project, the eligible value of the project to be abated will be limited to the difference between the cost of the project and the appraised value of the existing facility that is to be deleted or reduced as a result of the project. 4 459 • 10. Duration. The duration of the abatement term shall be seven (7) years commencing within the tax year 1992, through the tax year 1998, inclusive. 11. Percent of Exemption. The percent of value to be abated each year is as follows: 11.1. Years One and Two. 100% of the value of the new eligible properties described in the Application shall be abated each year for the first two years. 11.2. Variance in Percent of Abatement. The County hereby grants a variance from its May 18, 1990 Guidelines with regard to the percent of abatement in years three through seven as follows: 11.21. Variance in Base Abatement, Years Three through • Seven. 85% of the value of the new eligible properties described in the Application shall be abated during years three through seven. 11.22. Additional Abatement - Residency Incentive. For each preceding year during years three through seven that out of the new jobs created as a result of the project, if 35% or more of the permanent employees of the project reside in Calhoun County, Formosa shall be entitled to an additional 15% abatement. In order to qualify for the residency incentive, Formosa must prove to the satisfaction of the County, or its designee, for each year in which the residency incentive is sought, that for the immediate preceding calendar year on a yearly average 35% of the employees hired after the effective date of this agreement as a result of the project • A 460 lived in Calhoun County. For purposes of the residency incentive, • the new employees must be permanent employees, who either directly or indirectly are working at the new project, or are replacing an existing employee in an unrelated job who has been transferred to the new project. Temporary or construction workers employed during the construction phase of the project shall not be considered for the residency incentive. New employees of a permanent contract labor force that are hired as a direct result of the project, and who are permanent, shall count in determining whether the residency incentive has been satisfied. The new permanent employees who are hired as a result of the project are only eligible in the employee count if they are hired after the effective date of this agreement. Each year the residency incentive applies, the employee count will be cumulative of all eligible employees hired for this project on • or after the effective date and still employed at the project at the time the count is made. 11.3 Abatement Subject To Rights Of Holders Of Outstanding Bonds. Pursuant to Tex. Tax Code §312.204(a), the abatement and exemption of taxes provided in this agreement is subject to the rights of holders of outstanding bonds of the County. 12. Reduction for closure,. curtailment etc of Existing Facilities. If, after the effective date of this tax abatement agreement and during the term of the abatement period, Formosa should close, cease production, or demolish any or all of a facility that was in existence on the effective date of this tax 3 • 461 • abatement agreement, or take any other similar action that would have the effect of reducing or deleting the value of the facility, or portion thereof from the tax rolls that was in existence on the effective date of this tax abatement agreement, regardless of the reason, then for the remaining term of the tax abatement agreement, the eligible value for abatement allowed in this tax abatement agreement shall be reduced by the amount of existing property value owned by the Taxpayer that is reduced or deleted from the tax roll. Depreciation, agreed to by the Chief Appraiser, or Appraisal Review Board, shall not be construed as a reduction or deletion of value for purposes of this limitation. 13. Commencement and Termination Dates. The effective • date of this tax abatement agreement shall be the date that the County executes this tax abatement agreement with Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas. The abatement granted in this agreement shall apply to all eligible improvements described in the application (Exhibit "A") and placed in .the reinvestment zone after the effective date. Taxes will be abated on eligible property for seven (7) consecutive tax years commencing January 1, 1992. Property otherwise eligible for tax abatement under this agreement shall be eligible for abatement only if the property is placed or constructed in the reinvestment zone after the effective date of this agreement, but on or before December 31, 1997. Taxes will be abated for eligible property in tax years 1992 through 1998, inclusive. 7 f L_J 462 • 14. Description of Project/Economic Life. The facilities designated in the Application are part of Formosals chemical manufacturing process at its Point Comfort Plant and specifically are identified as an expansion of the Ethylene complex Expansion Project with an economic life of at least 21 years. The nature of the construction is more completely described in the Application. Construction will not start until after the effective date of this agreement and completion of construction is estimated to occur in 1993. A complete property description is contained in the Application. 15. Default, Notice. Cure, Termination, Etc Should the County determine that Formosa is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the County shall notify Formosa in writing at the address stated in this Agreement, • and if such default is not cured within 60 days from the date of written notice, or within an approved extended curative time as • authorized by g7(a) of the County's Guidelines, this Agreement may be terminated by the Commissioners for cause. 15.1. Events of Default. The following shall be considered events of default, should Formosa: 15.11 Allow any of its ad valorem taxes owed to the County to become delinquent without timely and proper protest and/or contest; or 15.12. Violate any of the terms and conditions of this or any other abatement agreement with the County or with any other 8 463 LJ taxing jurisdiction that has granted Formosa tax abatement for any project that the County has also granted tax abatement; or 15.13. Discontinue producing the product or service described in the Application for any reason excepting fire, explosion or other casualty or accident or natural disaster for a period -of one year during the abatement period after the facility is completed and begins producing the product or service; or 15.14. Violate any written term, covenant, condition, agreement, or promise of gift or donation made by Formosa to the County, • although such may be extraneous to this Agreement, and even though same may be otherwise unenforceable; or 15.15. Make any material misrepresentation, or omit any material fact either in the application or in the amended tax abatement agreement. (Material Misrepresentation or omission of a material fact means a false statement or omission about a material matter which induced the Commissioners to take any specific action on the application for tax abatement, and without such misrepresentation, the Commissioners would not have granted this • G7 mom • tax abatement agreement, or would have taken some action different than they actually did. 15.2. Termination Retroactive. Termination of the Tax Abatement Agreement for cause shall be retroactive to the effective date of this Agreement. Termination shall be effected by resolution of the Commissioners and written notice of termination • shall be mailed to Formosa. 15.3. Non Waiver. In the event the County fails to act on or enforce any element or breach that is identified as a default, such failure to act shall not be a waiver of the County's right to subsequently enforce the same default or any other prior or subsequent default. 15.4. Recapture of Taxes. On termination for cause, Formosa shall then become liable for the payment of all taxes that would have otherwise become due but for this Abatement Agreement for all calendar years during which the Abatement Agreement was in effect. Such taxes shall be paid to the Calhoun County Appraisal District to the credit of the County within 60 days from the date of receipt of notice of termination. All such taxes shall include statutory penalty and interest from the date they would otherwise have become delinquent, as if they had not been abated, until the date they are actually paid. 15.5. Administration and Enforcement. The administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall be in accordance with the terms contained herein and the Guidelines as adopted by the Commissioners on May 18, 1990. In the event of any 10 465 conflict in the terms of this Agreement and the Guidelines adopted • by the Commissioners, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail, unless prohibited by law, then the Guidelines adopted by the Commissioners and their provisions shall prevail. 15.6. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned, either in whole or part, without the express written consent of County. Any assignment is subject to the conditions contained in the Guidelines and this Agreement. Any attempt to assign this Agreement, except as provided herein, shall be null and void. 16. Type of Legal Entity_ Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas is a corporation, duly organized, validly existing, incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, and in good standing. Formosa is duly qualified and in good standing under the • laws of the State of Texas and has all requisite power and authority to own and operate properties and to carry on its business as now being or intended to be conducted. The name and address of the registered agent for service in Texas is: C. T. Corporation System 1601 Elm Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Formosa shall notify the County within 60 days of any change in the registered agent or status of the Corporation. 17. Notices. Any notices required to be given hereunder, shall be given in writing as follows: (a) County: County Judge Calhoun County Courthouse 211 S. Ann • Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 11 M • (b) FORMOSA: Jack Wu, Agent and Attorney in Fact Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas P. O. Box 700 Point Comfort, Texas 77978 18. Reimbursement for Fees and Expenses. Within 30 days from receipt of written notice, Formosa will reimburse the County for any expenses, directly or indirectly incurred by the County for processing and approving the Application for Tax Abatement, preparation and presentation of this Tax Abatement Agreement, and any other expenses reasonably incurred by the County in any way related thereto, including all expenses that may be incurred in enforcing or defending any term, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement. In the event the County orders a feasibility study of the impact of the Formosa Project on the County during the term • of this agreement, Formosa shall reimburse the county in accordance with the reimbursement procedure for the other expenses listed • above. 19. Indemnity. Formosa hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the County, each of its elected officials, all of its servants, agents and employees, and any designee (a person or legal entity designated to perform any function required under the County's Guidelines, or under the tax abatement application, or by the terms of this amended tax abatement agreement) and the Calhoun County Appraisal District, its officers, directors, servants, agents and employees from the amounts of any and all liabilities, claims, costs, judgements, penalties, interest, court costs and 12 attorney fees incurred by the County, each of its elected officials, all of its servants, agents and employees, or any designee, and the Calhoun County Appraisal District, its officers, directors, servants, agents and employees in defense of any claims occurring out of or in any way incident to processing the application, or any other claim arising out of or incident to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this tax abatement agreement, or arising out of or in connection with the reinvestment zone, or the project subject to abatement. 20. Incontestability. At the option of the County, this Agreement may be terminated, and all taxes that would have otherwise been due but for this Abatement Agreement will become due and payable within 60 days from date of written notice of the amounts due and owing, including penalty and interest as provided in paragraph 15 of this Agreement if any of the following events occur: (a) If Formosa should contest any term, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement, or attempt to prevent or negate the enforceability of any of such terms, covenants or conditions; or (b) If any third party, firm, corporation or other legal entity should contest any term, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement, and prevent or negate the enforceability of any of such terms, covenants or conditions by final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction; or 13 q • • • (c) If any governmental agency should contest any term, • covenant or condition contained in this Agreement, and either by enforceable regulatory order, or by final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction prevent or negate the enforceability of any of such terms, covenants or conditions. 21. Assurances and special Conditions. The County and Formosa agree that the following assurances, promises and conditions are made by Formosa expressly to induce the County to grant this tax abatement agreement and that without such assurances, promises and conditions the County would not have granted this tax abatement agreement. Formosa hereby expressly makes and agrees to be bound by the following representations, assurances, promises and conditions: 21.1. Accuracy of Information. That all information • contained in Formosa's application and furnished to the County for incorporation in this tax abatement agreement is true, complete and correct. 21.2. Authority to sign. That the person who signed the application for tax abatement agreement on behalf of Formosa had unrestricted authority to execute the application, and that the person signing this contract document on behalf of Formosa has the unrestricted authority to obligate Formosa to all the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this tax abatement agreement. By acceptance of any of the benefits provided hereunder, Formosa has authorized the execution and delivery of this Agreement and 14 • 469 • represents that it is! enforceable against Formosa in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 21.3. Commencement of Construction. That construction will not commence on any of the eligible improvements until after this tax abatement agreement is executed by the County. 21.4. Permits. That the project described in the application, and this tax abatement agreement will not be constructed without first obtaining all necessary local, state and federal environmental and construction permits, and that Formosa will abide by all conditions of the permits, laws and ordinances, rules and regulations governing the construction and operation of the project throughout its economic life. 21.5. All Conditions to be Performed. That Formosa will • abide by all conditions of this tax abatement agreement and the Guidelines adopted by the Commissioners applicable to this agreement. 21.6. Public Health and safety. That the planned use of the property will not constitute a hazard to public health or safety throughout the economic life of the project. 21.7. Required to Make Specific Improvements. That Formosa will make the specific improvements to the property as described in its application. (See Exhibit "A") 21.8. Estimates/Strict compliance. Estimates of the cost and value of the project and the number of jobs retained or created as a result of the project that are within 90% of actual cost, value and number of jobs may be construed to be substantial 15 470 compliance. Unless estimates are expressly authorized, strict compliance is required. • 21.9. Enforcement of Environmental/Safety Provisions. In the event Formosa is fined, or assessed a penalty by the Texas Air Control Board, Texas Water Commission, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, or any successor thereto, or by a court of competent jurisdiction for violation of any of its permits, any regulatory rule or regulation, or local, state or federal law, regulation or ordinance promulgated or enforced by the Texas Air Control Board, Texas Water Commission, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, or any successor thereto governing or regulating the construction or operation of the project that is the subject of this or any other abatement agreement between the County and Formosa, executed either prior or subsequently to this agreement or if by agreement, compromise or settlement Formosa pays a fine, • penalty or payment of any nature related to any alleged violation for any of the foregoing, then in such event Formosa shall pay the County an amount of money equivalent to the amount of the fine, penalty or payment as an unrestricted donation to the County. Formosa shall notify the County within 30 days after any such fine, penalty or payment is assessed against it relating to the construction or operation of any portion or component of the project subject to this or any other Abatement Agreement between Formosa and the County. The amounts due the County under this paragraph shall be payable annually on or before January 31st for all such fines or penalties assessed against Formosa or payments 16 471 n U made to such agencies to settle alleged violations in the immediate preceding calendar year. This covenant shall remain in effect throughout the economic life of the projects. Formosa and the County have a similar provision to this paragraph 21.9 in their amended tax abatement agreement for a $1,025,000,000.00 project executed on even date herewith. The County shall be paid one time annually for all fines, penalties, or settlement payments paid to Texas Air Control Board, Texas Water Commission, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency or their successors, for the preceding year. The inclusion of a similar provision in the $1,025,000,000.00 abatement agreement shall never be construed to require Formosa to pay to the County double the amount of all • fines, penalties or settlement payments described above. 22. Information to Determine Compliance Formosa covenants and agrees to provide within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days after written request, such information as may be required by the County or its designee, in order to determine compliance on Formosa's part of the terms of this tax abatement agreement. 23. Value of Project After Abatement The estimated value„�f1e eligible property that is being abated will be $17) 000, 0.00 on January 1, 1999. 24. Contract Terms and Conditions survive Abatement Period. Unless sooner terminated under other provisions hereunder, all other rights, duties and obligations contained in this • Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until all taxes 17 472 levied in each of the seven (7) years in which an exemption applied • under this Agreement are fully paid by Formosa, and all other covenants and conditions have been fulfilled. Provided, however, that no extension of the abatement period shall occur as a result of this Agreement beyond the 1998 tax year, it being the intent of the parties that seven (7) years is the limit of abatement granted. 25. Miscellaneous. The following additional provisions are included and are made express conditions of this tax abatement agreement in order to carry out the intent and purposes of the County's Guidelines, or to address any special problems or needs arising out of the uniqueness of the project, the application, or Formosa: 25.1. Agreement survives Reinvestment Zone. it is specifically understood and agreed that the designation of the reinvestment zone in which the eligible property described in this • Tax Abatement Agreement is located is valid for a period of five years from May 31, 1989, unless subsequently extended. The fact that the designation of the reinvestment zone may expire before this Agreement terminates shall not effect the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 25.2. Payment of Taxes. During the term of this Agreement, Formosals taxes shall be payable as follows: 25.21. The value of any ineligible property as described in Section 2(g) of the County's Guidelines adopted on May 18, 1990 shall be fully taxable. 18 473 LJ 25.22. The base year value of existing property not otherwise eligible for tax abatement as determined each year shall be fully taxable; and 25.23. The additional value of new eligible property in the reinvestment zone shall be taxable subject to the exemptions provided in Paragraph it above. 25.3. Conflicts of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to its conflicts of laws rule. 25.4. severability. At the option of the County, the invalidity of any one or more covenants, phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this agreement shall not affect the remaining portions of this agreement or any part hereof, • and in case of any such invalidity, this agreement may be construed as if such invalid covenants, phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections were not included. 25.5. subtitles. The use of subtitles in this Agreement is strictly for convenience, and shall have no legal significance whatsoever. The use of the singular shall include the plural and the use of plural shall include the singular when appropriate. The use of any reference to gender shall include any and all other genders when appropriate. 25.6. Place of Performance. This Agreement, in its entirety, shall be performable in Calhoun County, Texas. As part of the consideration for entering into this Agreement, both County and Formosa agree that any litigation to construe or enforce the W* 474 terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be brought in the • State Courts of Calhoun County, Texas. 25.7. Acceptance by Formosa. By acceptance of this Agreement and/or any benefits conferred hereunder, Formosa represents that its undersigned agent has complete and unrestricted authority to enter into this Tax Abatement Agreement and to obligate and bind Formosa to all of the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. Formosa agrees to be bound by all assurances and commitments contained in the application dated July 3, 1991, the Guidelines and Criteria as applicable, and the specific terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Tax Abatement Agreement. 25.8. Approval by Commissioners This Agreement, in its entirety, including authority to execute it in this form, has been • approved by the Commissioners, in a regular meeting of the Commissioners, after due notice as required by law, and pursuant to Resolution duly adopted by the Commissioners by at least a three - fourths vote of the entire Commissioners Court. 25.9. Binding Effect. This Agreement, in its entirety, shall be binding upon all the parties hereto, their respective successors and/or assigns. EXECUTED IN MULTIPLE ORIGINALS on the j�71b day of August, 1991, to be effective immediately. 20 475 ATTEST: �), a 12"t Marle a Paul, County Clerk n COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS COURT CALHOUN COUfiTY, TEA FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS By: 4414✓ Jac Wu, Agent and Attorney in Fact (Power of Attorney attached) 21 • • • 476 • • • j FORMIOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS P. O. BOX 700 201 FORMOSA DRIVE POINT COMFORT, TEXAS 77978 July 3, 1991 The Honorable Howard Hartzog County Judge Calhoun county Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Judge Hartzog: PHONE: 512/987-7000 FAX: 512/987-2721 Re: Application for Tax Abatement Agreement The commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas has heretofore designated Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone, 1989 on May 31, 1989. A copy of the plats showing the boundaries of the reinvestment zone are attached hereto, marked Exhibits "1-1", "1-2" and 111-3" and made a part hereof for any and all purposes. The county also on May 31, 1989 granted the Formosa Plastics corporation a tax abatement agreement on a project then estimated to cost $1,700,000,000.00. On even date herewith, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas has filed an application to amend the original tax abatement agreement, deleting certain aspects of the original project, reducing the estimated cost/value of the project and reducing the estimated number of permanent jobs. Please consider this as an application from Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas for an additional tax abatement agreement for projects to be located in the Formosa Plastics Corporation Reinvestment Zone, 1989. 1. A list of the kind, number and location of all Proposed improvements contemplated in this project are as follows: a. A new Linear Low Density Polyethylene Plant (LLDPE) at an approximate value of $140,000,000.00. The location of this plant is shown on attached map, marked Exhibit 112-111. b. The addition of two Co -generation Units (Co-gen units #4 and #5), to the existing Utilities area at an approximate value Of $29,000,000.00, to be located within the Utility areas on the attached map, marked Exhibit "2-1". C. The addition of a Cracking Furnace (#9 cracker, one precut heater and storage tanks) to the existing Olefins unit, at an approximate value of $16,000,000.00, located within the Olefins area on the attached map, marked Exhibit "2-1". "A" 4/ A - r July 3, 1991 Page 2 d. The addition of a third Polypropylene Train (PP Train #3) to the existing Polypropylene unit, at an approximate value of $9,000,000.00, located within the PP area on the attached map, marked Exhibit 112-111. e. A Marine Loading Facility (including tanks and a flare), at an approximate value of $6,000,000.00, will also be added to the project. The location of the facility is on the attached map, marked Exhibit 112-211. 2.(a) All of the foregoing additions to the original project will be utilized to expand the capacity, capabilities and diversity of the plants being built on Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas property in Calhoun County and will be utilized for the processing, purification, and the conversion of raw materials into intermediate and finished goods, and the processing, purification, packaging and shipping of the intermediate and finished goods to the open market, both domestic and international. (b) Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas represents to the Commissioners Court that the proposed use of the property is consistent with the use of the existing property. The entirety of the facilities will encourage further development in the reinvestment zone during the time the tax exemptions are in effect because of their inherent design to convert base raw materials into intermediate raw materials that require more complete processing before they can be marketed to the actual consumer. 3. A map showing existing uses and conditions of the real property in the reinvestment zone is attached, marked Exhibit n3u 4. Maps showing the proposed improvements and uses in the reinvestment zone are attached, marked Exhibits 112-111, 112-2" and "3". 5. An estimate of the project cost and new value that will result from the expansion and new improvements to be undertaken as described in this application is $200,000,000.00. 6. It is estimated that the number of jobs that will be created by the expansion and new improvements is 150 permanent jobs upon completion of the' projects described in this application. • 7. The estimated date of start of construction is the fall of 1991. The estimated length of construction is three years. • The estimated value of new improvements to be completed during each year of construction and estimated date of completion is as follows: July 3, 1991 Page 3 • (a) 10% to be completed by December 31, 1991; (b) 70% to be completed by December 31, 1992; and (c) 100% to be completed by December 31, 1993. 8.(a) The Linear Low Density Polvethvlene Plant will utilize a solution process to produce 240,000 tons per year of LLDPE pellets. The plant will be able to produce homopolymers and two types of copolymers, one using butene as the conomoner and one using octene as the conomoner depending upon the grade of pellet which is required. The plant, consisting of three production trains and associated downstream handling equipment, will be designed and operated according to the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Subpart DDD. (b) The Marine Loading Facility (Dock Area Tank Farm) will consist of knockout tanks, an incinerator/scrubber system, and a flare system. Raw materials can be off-loaded from ships and barges at the Port of Port Lavaca -Point Comfort/Calhoun County Navigation District, then temporarily stored at the Shore Area Tank Farm prior to transfer to the plant. Products from the plants can be piped to the Shore Area Tank Farm, then to the Marine Loading Facility prior to transfer to ship or barge. (c) The Co -generation units, Cracking Furnace and Polypropylene Train are all additions of similar facilities previously described in the original tax abatement application and agreement, and simply expand the capacity of the overall • facilities. See also number 1 and 2 above. 9. A legal description of the property comprising the reinvestment zone are attached, marked Exhibit 114-111, 114-2" and 114- 3" 10. In 1989, before the first project was commenced, the value of the land and existing improvements in the reinvestment zone was $119,675,400.00. Since the first tax abatement agreement in 1989 was granted, the value of the land and improvements has increased to $323,805,400.00. 11. Since Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas is well known to the Commissioners Court, no financial data is being submitted with this application. We have previously submitted financial information to the Commissioners court in our prior applications. Should the Commissioners Court require additional financial data, please notify us and we will provide whatever is available that you request. 12. It is estimated that the property value subject to abatement in this application will be $188,000,000.00 on January 1, 1999. • ", 1 July 3, 1991 • Page 4 13. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas makes the following assurances to the Commissioners Court: (a) That all the information contained in this application is true and correct. (b) That the person signing this application on behalf Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas has unrestricted authority to execute the application and the contract documents on behalf of Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas and has unrestricted authority to obligate Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas to all the terms, covenants and conditions that will be contained in the tax abatement agreement. (c) That construction will not commence on any of the eligible improvements until a tax abatement agreement has been executed with the designating authority, which in this case is Calhoun County, Texas. (d) That the project will not be constructed without first obtaining all necessary local, state and federal • environmental and construction permits, and that Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas will abide by all conditions of the permits, laws and ordinances, rules and regulations governing the operation of the project throughout its economic life. (e) That Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas will abide by all conditions of the tax abatement agreement and the Guidelines and Criteria adopted by the Commissioners Court on May 18, 1990. (f) That the planned use of the property will not constitute a hazard to the public health or safety throughout the economic life of the project. (g) That Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas will make the specific improvements to the property as described in this application. (h) That the estimates of the cost and value of the project and the number of permanent jobs created as a result of the project will not be less than 85% of the actual cost/value of the project and actual number of permanent jobs. 14. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas is a corporation, duly organized, existing and in good standing under the laws of State of Delaware. It has been issued a certificate of authority by the Secretary of State of Texas to do business in Texas, and is duly qualified and in good standing in accordance • with the laws of the State of Texas to conduct business operations in the State of Texas. The registered agent for service in Texas is: July 3, 1991 Page 5 • C. T. Corporation 1601 Elm Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas represents to the County that it will notify the County within 60 days of any change of the registered agent or status of the corporation. 15. The name, title and address of Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas' representative for purposes of giving notice is as follows: Jack Wu, Agent and Attorney in Fact Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas P. O. Box 700 Point Comfort, Texas 77978 16. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas hereby waives all rights to confidentiality with regard to the contents of this application for tax abatement otherwise granted to it under TEX.TAX CODE ANN. §312.003. 17. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas hereby agrees to reimburse the County for all legal fees and any other expenses that the County incurs in reviewing, processing and acting on this application for tax abatement. Further, Formosa Plastics • Corporation, Texas agrees to pay for the cost of a feasibility study, if the County requires one in connection this application for tax abatement, conditioned upon Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas being given notice and the opportunity to withdraw its application prior to commencement of the feasibility study, should Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas be unwilling to pay the total cost of any feasibility study required by the County. This commitment to pay all such fees and expenses incurred by the County is unconditional, not withstanding whether the Commissioners Court may ultimately approve, modify or deny the application for tax abatement. 18. In the County's Guidelines and Criteria, the taxpayer/applicant is required to submit any other information that the Commissioners Court or Applicant may deem appropriate to assist the Court in determining whether to enter into a tax abatement agreement with Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas offers the following in support of this application: (a) The facilities described in this application are additional units to the original project and provide two new units that were not originally contemplated, but are all part of Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas manufacturing facilities which establishes its eligibility within the criteria set forth in the 481 July 3, 1991 Page 6 • County's Guidelines and Criteria. (b) The estimated life of the improvements to be placed on the property as described in this application is at least 21 years. 19. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas request a variance in the percent of exemption to be granted in years 3 through 7, as previously accorded Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas in its original agreement with the County. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests that the same percent of exemption be granted on the facilities included in this application, specifically, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests that 85% of the value of the new eligible properties described in this application should be abated during years 3 through 7. Further, in each year during years 3 through 7 that 35% or more of the employees hired to staff the new or expanded facilities are residents of Calhoun County, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests an additional 15% abatement. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas requests this variance because of the magnitude of the combined total projects to be built by Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas in Calhoun County totaling $1,025,000,000.00 as amended in the original agreement, • $66,000,000.00 in the second agreement, and $200,000,000.00 as contemplated in this application, for a total commitment in Calhoun County of new and expanded facilities of $1,291,000,000.00. The combined projects will also create permanent new jobs of 850 for the original project, 34 jobs at the Storage Tank Farm/Cryogenic Plant and 150 jobs at the new and expanded facilities described in this application for a total compliment of permanent jobs of 1034. In addition, it is estimated that the combined projects will result in 4000 construction jobs. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas respectfully requests your favorable consideration of this application and to grant it tax abatement as requested herein on the eligible improvements as described in this application. JW/ hartzog.cty Respectfully submitted, FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS By: �2 JacK Wu, Agent and Attorney in Fact (Power of Attorney Attached) • 482 C • • T 93tf-e— a( M.-m : N161E:39-9 ...... ..ux•[.e. Ixt.. Lax .1.x• 1—.1x[x• That 1, FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS as principal residing at 9 Peach Tree Hill Road, Livingston, Essex County, New Jersey (07039) sometimes referred to as "I" or "my" do hereby constitute and appoint, JACK WU, an individual, sometimes referred to as "You" residing at 201 Formosa Avenue, Point Comfort, Calhoun County, Texas (77978) my true and lawful attorney for me, and in my name, place and stead, to do each and every act which I could personally do for the following uses and purposes: 1. To make, execute and deliver that certain TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT between FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS and the COUNTY OF CALHOUN TEXAS regarding the "$200,000,000.00 Expansion of the Ethylene Complex Expansion Project' (copy of which is annexed hereto and hereby made a part hereof) upon such terms and provisions and subject to such con- ditions as You shall deem proper and appropriate. 2. Cenerally, to do, execute and perform any other act, matter or thing whatsoever, that, in your opinion, ought to be done, executed and performed in connection with the foregoing matter, as I could do if Dersonally present to effectuate the action and actions contemplated giving and granting unto my said attorney full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and pur- poses as I might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution and revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my said attorney or substitute shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. and I ratify all that which You have done on my behalf, all in • reference to the effectuating of the foregoing and only with respect thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of:� ANN H. ROSS I have hereunto set my hand and seal on August 2 1991 FO PLAS7 �CORPO -A ION. TEXAS By- ............. _.........t.. .....M../.. .............. .... CHARLES H. cAULIr Vice President and Secretary -if you want this power to continue in effect if you become disabled or incapacitated, insert the following: "This power of attorney shall not be affected by my becoming disabled or incapacitated." -if you want this power to become effective only in the event of subsequent disability or incapacity, insert the following: "This power of attorneys become effec a in the event of my subsequent disability or incapacity." see NIS 46:2B-8 on reverse side. ,r He/`/// PREPARED BY y�.—IL�l-Gala LES c FE .,. T nr "I crnTr nc vrcl Trncry 483 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTYOF ESSEX BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 2nd day of August . 19 91 , before me, the subscriber,a Notary Public State of New Jersey, personally appeared CHARLES H. McAULIFFE who. 1 am satisfied, is the principal mentioned in, and who executed the within power of attorney and ac. knowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered the same as h is act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein expressed. of this Corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC- . ANN N, ROSS NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY hly Comrtdggbn Expires D,,, 15, 1992 Z O ^^H tT O 0 U U Vi U H � i ti m On� 6 � A N a sat O 46:28-8. Power of attorney unaffected by disability of principal according to its terms; accountability to guardian; disability defined a. Whenever a principal dasignno mother hie womry in fan o ant by a power of anomcy in writing soil the writing comaim the words "This power of am o, shall not bF affected by disability of the principal." or 'This power of anomcy shall b«nme e6rstiva upon the disability of the principal," or similar word. showing the intent of the principal he, the authority conferred shall be ncreisable notwithstanding his disability, the authority of the attorney in fact or.gent is as a ssable by bins provided in the power oa behalf of the principal nolwitMtmding firer disability or incapacity of the principal a lawor later uncertainty as to whether We principal is dud or alive. All sets done by the Iromey in fan or agent pursuant to the power daring any period of diabihty or iroc,anpoterict or uncertainty m whnhar the principal is dead o dive have the same effect and inure to the benefit of and bind the principal or his heirs, deviacea and Personal representative as if the principal were dive, compoent and not disabled. If a guardian is appointed for the principal. she auormy in fact or agent, durinf the continuance of the appointment stall account to the guardian rather Wan rim principal. The guardian has the wee power the principal would have had to revoke We power of attorney or agency. IN, A principal shall be under a disability ii he is unable so mansge his psopFay and .0 airs egeui+Fly for ....s sorb as mensal direst, mental deficiency, physical illneu or disability, advanced age, chronic use of drugs, chronic intodcati... confinenmnt, detention by a lor<ign power, or diseppe.nnca. • • 484 0 EXHIBIT " 1-1" 485 r EXHIBIT " I - 2" W 0 EXHIBIT " 1-3 " r v 487 ro PLAT FPG-TEXAS EXPANSION PROJECT PLOT PLAN EXHIBIT " 2-1 " A • i r ] _ I 4 I Q .!T _ ESR� _ _ _ _ �• f /[ { PwfKnvp .I<GA _ _ _ _ — — — I 9) Ip Y i I I ^;•; rii I; wi W I'I3yx I S I le LI IIb _ I RAW WATER -I Ila i• i V I ua2µ tld_ YPLMlIF ffl'P +IfrWA o 0 4<rtaa 760G ctY POND E 1 ta %% d N9676 y e I ' y Y f 1 a+J I ^OfELs 7aoxn5d ya976 . 'JLEfINS 11L.LILL '' I• G Y�>+<-r. wnwsqus I OSBL wPTER: I .-, II __ TkE�T•UfNi + N - C PI Y � I J w yDl O •� IGS UTILITY t�-•• w f� /SBL .I ' r r o• 9121� 1120• x ? , r _ i7nmvitrl 9501//BY o ,p 12E.. <I100 ,^',l w N6 e ®-F II __xun ZZ- my PI'. LLDPE PE j v"Y HOPE 0 a 2i �ii'-'/Ss- sD'.eaD' )LtJL.• ; SLret�': e I E Al - D r ;Y✓� WASTE \ �` w eda.zla n 7�<i"tl 30' WATER EnC ?\' SJ G<.136d 136FY 31fY `" "' w NS 6f3 '-L \� .r� rr�Nrl a P'�/ IIEN DFiLAII�tlN WIFAVI OTY. PEMMN Y ) 6 aie'R�d30 wl. ri. r,.P I lA� FOflMOdA PU TICS T��COPPOPATION —� 4y I! �IL.`- I: J�4 tD'I 14/ Pn. soe.DDrowr cnuron. n.nnv ) - � .CI ` ,II` II PD� W.Y 1O MM-fb,''GfU Lx! • - ' "�" _ FPG-TEXAS EXPANSIO i PROJECT wPLOT PLA N .,I...-F PP 1-1 • 0 • 0 PLAT FPG- TEXAS EXPANSION PROJECT PLOT PLAN EXHIBIT " 2-2 " • 489 .r. "A EXHIBIT " 3 " 490 255.111 Acres 0 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN ) J Part Of The Thomas Cox Survey A-10 And The Phillip Dimmit Survey, A-11, Calhoun County, Texas FIELDNOTE DESCRIPTION of a tract or parcel of land containing 255.711 acres situated In and a part of the Thomas Cox Survey, A-10 and the Phillip DTmmlt Survey A-11, Calhoun County, Texas, This 255,711 acres is further described as being a part of a 54.9691 acre tract described in a Deed from Charles H. Sample (Trustee) to Aluminum Company of America, 6f record in Volume 110, Page 42, of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas, and is also a part of that same 911,38 acre tract conveyed from Stella Traylor, a widow, Dixon Lee Traylor, Jr., and wife, Dorothy Sue Traylor, and Patricia Lynne Brady and husband, Sam H. Brady, to Aluminum Company of America by Deed of Record in Volume 294, Pages 617-621 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas, This 255,711 acres is more fully described by metes and bounds as follove: BEGINNING at a one (1) inch iron pipe found in the East line of the aforementioned 54.9691 acre tract. Said one (1) inch iron pipe being the Northeast corner of a 1.7365 acre tract conveyed from Aluminum Company of America to J. E. EzzeU by Deed of record in Volume 273, Pages 653-655 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas; THENCE, S 890 09, W at 467.53 feet pass a one (1) inch iron pipe found on line, at e05,62 feet pass a one (1) inch iron pipe found on line for the Northwest corner of a 2.5613 acre tract conveyed from Aluminum Company of America to J. E. Ezzell by Deed of record in Volume 258, Pages 260-262 of the Calhoun County Deed Records, and for a total distance of 1225.30 feet to a 5/8 Inch +i on rod act in concrete for corner; N 000 56' W with the West line of this 255.711 acres herein described for a distance of 2712.42 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in concrete for corner; THENCE,IN 890 04' E with the North line of the herein described 255.711 acres pass at 2000.00 feet a 5/8 inch iron rod set in concrete, pass at 4DOO.0 feet a 5/8 Inch iron rod set in concrete • for a total distance of 6228.22 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in concrete for point of angle to the left in said North line; THENCE, N 61° 41' E continuing with said North line pass at 1308.56 feet a j/8 inch iron rod set in concrete for a distance of 1508.56 feet to the center of Cox's Creek for the Northeast corner of the herein described 255,73-1 acres; THENCE, S 050 54' W with the center of Cox's Creek a distance of 78.97 feet; THENCE, S 300 41' E continuing with said center of Cox's Creek for a distance of 84.77 feet to a point in the North '.line of State Highway No. 35; TESKE, S 610 41' W with said North line of State Highway No. 35 for a distance of 144.57 feet to a concrete right-of-vay monument found for corner; THENCE, S 280 19- E for a distance of 50.0 feet to a concrete right-of-vay monument found for corner; -4-1- �_ 4�1 THENCE, S 61e 41' W with said North line of State Highway No. 35 for a distance of 2363.75 feet (actual) 2364 feet (call) to n 5/8 inch iron rod found for the Southeast corner of a 1.038 acre tract described in a Deed from D. L. Traylor, Jr., et al to the State of Texas of record in volume 2280 Page 36, of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas; THENCE, N 490 28' W for a distance of 241.78 feet (actual) 241.32 feet (call) to a 5fB inch Iron rod found for corner; THENCE, S 61.0 hi, W with the North line of said 1.038 acre for a distance of 273.70 feet (actual) 273.79 feet(call)to a 5/6 Inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE, S 010 17' W (actual) S 010 13' W (call) for a distance of 253.22 feet (actual) 252.86 feet (call) to a 5/8 Inch iron rod found for corner In the North line of State Righvay No. 35; THENCE FOLLOWING, the North line of State Highvay No. 35 as follows: 5 610 41' W for a distance of 249.42 feet (actual) 249.55 feet (call) to a broken concrete right-of-way monument) S 289 19' E for a distance of 5.0 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner; S 61e 43' W for a distance of 2348.67 feet (actual) 2348.99 feet (call) to a concrete right-of-vay monument found for a point of angle to the left in said. North right-of-vmy of State Highway No. 35; THENCE, S 610 42' W continuing with the North line of State Highway No. 35 for a distance of 1611.79 feet (actual) 1608.o0 feet (call) to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for corner( THENCE, N 010 01' W at 11.80 feet pass the Southeast corner of the aforementioned 1.7365 acre J. E. Ezzell Tract and at a total distance of 99.96 feet to THE PLACE OF BEGINNING! containing within these metes and bounds 255.711 acres situated in and a part of the Tbomas Cox Survey, A-10 and the Phillip Dimmit Survey, A-11, Calhoun County, Texas. The foregoing FIEUROTSS were prepared from an actual on the ground survey made under my direction and supervision In May 1979, and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. e lmond E. uch Registered Public Surveyor No. 1840 The concerned tract of land is as stated above less that stated below: BEGINNING at one (t) inch iron Pipe found in the East line of the aforementioned 54.9691 acre tract. Said one (1) inch iron pipe being the Northeast corner of a 1.7356 acre tract conveyed from Aluminum273, Pages 653A655 America he Deed of Records of Calhoun County. volume Texas; THENCE, along S 89 DEG 09 MIN to N 00 DEG 56 MIN for a total distance of 1225.30. THENCE, along N 00 DEG 56 MIN to CITY LIMITS for a total distance of 2712,42 feet. THENCE, east along CITY LIMITS and south at the corner and back to the BEGINNING. %AR Ho ��_ 1 HollaQYay Contract A8ninistrator • 492 C J •.I Aluminum Company of America 1560.40 Acres, More or Less STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF JACKSON COUNTY OF CALHOUN Being in and a part of the Hugh McGuffin Survey, Abstract No. 43, Jackson County, Texas, and The Phillip Dimmit Survey, Abstract No. 11 Calhoun County, Texas. 0 FIELDNOTE DESCRIPTION: Being 1560.40 acres, more or less, situated in and a part of the Hugh McGuffin Survey, Abstract No. 43, Jackson County, Texas and The Phillip Dimmit Survey, Abstract No. 11, Calhoun County, Texas. Said 1560.40 acres more or less, being in and a part of two (2) tracts or parcels of land, first being that certain 909.53 acres of land conveyed in a Deed from Gene C. Traylor, et,ux. to Aluminum Company of America, dated December 18, 1979 and recorded in Volume 294, Page 599 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas. Second being that certain 911.38 acre tract conveyed from Stella Traylor, et.al., to Aluminum Company of America by Deed dated December 11, 1975 and recorded in Volume 294, Pages 617-621 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas. This 1560.40 acres, more or less, is more partic- ularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument found for the North- east corner of the aforementioned 909.53 acres for the Northeast corner of this 1560.40 acres being described; THENCE, S O1 deg. 04' 00" E along the East line of said 909.53 acres for a distance of 1497.91 feet to a concrete monument found in the Jackson -Calhoun County Line for a corner of the herein described 1560.40 acres, also being a corner of the aforesaid 909.53 acres; THENCE, S 88 deg. County Line for iron pipe found being described; 56' 00" W along said Jackson -Calhoun a distance of 3598.76 feet to a 1" for a corner of this 1560.40 acres THENCE; S 89 deg.06' 00" W continuing with said Jackson -Calhoun County Line for a distance of 252.49 feet to a'3/8" iron rod found for a corner of the herein described 1560.40 acres; THENCE, S 88 deg. 58' 00" W with said Jackson - Calhoun County Line at 680.97 passing at 5/8 iron rod found on line for a total distance of 831.27 feet to the center of Cox's Creek; THENCE, with the centerline meanaers of Creek as follows: Exhibit 493 S 04 deg. 23' 36" E, 69. 50 feet S 21 deg. 45' 00" W, 140.00 feet S 20 deg. 30' 00" E, 211.00 feet S 02 deg. 35' 00" E, 201.00 feet S 10 deg. 20' 00" E, 200.00 feet S 23 deg. 10' 00" W, 85.00 feet S 66 deg. 00' 00" W, 190.00 feet S 05 deg. 30' 00" W, 630.00 feet S 34 deg. 00' 00" W, 210.00 feet S 22 deg. 10' 00" W, 705.00 feet S 50 deg. 15' 00" W, 210.00 feet S 33 deg. 00' 00" W, 235.86 feet S 33 deg. 00' 00" W, 66.14 feet S 03 deg. 40' 00" E, 200.00 feet S 40 deg. 10' 00" E, 170.00 feet N 83 deg. 35' 00" E, 100.00 feet S 66 deg. 10' 00" E, 200.00 feet S 27 deg. 25' 00" E, 391.00 feet S 75 deg. 20' 00" E, 155.00 feet N 62 deg. 45' 00" E,. 110.00. feet S 89 deg. 00' 00" E, 90.00 feet S 39 deg. 31' 00" E, 202.10 feet S 01 deg. 16' 00" E, 48.44 feet S 12 deg. 48' 59" E, 103.94 feet S 02 deg. 41' 37" E, 172.25 feet S 23 deg. 20' 36" E, 305.61 feet S 14 deg. 46' 38" E, 97.24 feet S 05 deg. 25' 38" E, 111.13 feet S 07 deg. 51' 23" W. 275.05 feet S 29 deg. 37' 24" W, 177.81 feet S 50 deg. 11' 24" W, 133.36 feet S 35 deg. 23' 24" W, 286.16 feet S 37 deg. 4423" W, 333.40 feet S 04 deg. 21' 24" W, 166.70 feet S 56 deg. 14' 36" E, 125.02 feet S 70 deg. 32' 35" E, 63.90 feet S 51 deg. 36' 38" E, 66.68 feet S 23 deg. 50' 23" E, 75.01 feet AND S 05 deg. 53' 25" W, 48.03 feet to a point at the Northeast corner of a 255.711 acre tract, conveyed from Aluminum Company of America to Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A. by Deed dated June 5, 1980 and recorded in Volume 329, Pages 785-796 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas; THENCE, S 61 deg. 41' 00" W along North line of aforereferenced 255.711 acres at 261.12 feet passing a 5/8" iron rod in concrete found on line, at 1514.08 feet set on line a total distance of 1541.8E feet to a 5/8" iron rod found for a corner of the herein described 1560.40 acres; THENCE, S B9 deg. 04' 00" W continuing with said North line of 255.711 acre tract at 2228.22 feet passing a 5/8 inch iron rod found on line, at 4228.22 feet passing a 5/8 inch iron rod found 'on line for a total distance of 6229.22 feet to concrete monument found for the Southwest corner of this 1560.40 acres, also being the Northwest corner of this aforesaid 255.711 acres7 P-2 • rUs THENCE, N 00 deg. 56' 00" W, 150.00 feet East of and parallel to the East line of Farm -To -Market Highway No. 1593 for a distance of 987.86 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for a corner of the herein described 1560.40 acres; • THENCE, N 00 deg. 58' 00" W with said line 150.00 feet East of and parallel to the East line of afore- said Farm -To -Market Highway No. 1593 for a distance of 2898.63 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the North line of said 911.38 acres also being the South line of aforesaid 909.53 acres of land for a corner of this 1560.40 acres being described; -- THENCE, N 00 deg. 57' 14" W continuing with a line which is 150.00 feet East of and parallel to the East line of Farm -To -Market Highway No. 1593 for a distance of 4229.90 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the North line of the aforeaid 909.53 acres of land for the Northwest corner of the herein des- cribed 1560.40 acres; THENCE, N 88 deg. 50' 23" E actual (Call N 88 deg. 58' 00" E) with the North line of aforesaid 909.53 acres for a distance of 2258.24 feet Actual (Call 2258.35 feet) to a 3/8" iron rod found for a corner of this 1560.40 acres being described; THENCE, N 89 deg. 00' 56" E Actual (Call N 88 deg. 59' 00" E) with North line of said 909.53 acres for a distance of 1552.93 feet Actual (Call 1553.18 feet) to a 1 inch iron pipe found for a corner of the herein described 1560.40 acres; THENCE, N 88 deg. 59' 00" E continuing with North line of aforesaid 909.53 acres for a distance of 3496.73 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for a corner • of this 1560.40 acres being described; THENCE, N 89 deg. 00' 13" E Actual (Call N 89 deg. ., 03' 00" E) with said North line of 909.53 acres at 150.00 feet passing a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the West bank of Cox's Creek for a total distance of 2498.88 feet Actual (Call 2498.91 feet) to a 3/8 inch iron rod found for a corner of the herein described 1560.40 acres; THENCE, N 89 deg. 02' 00" E continuing with North line of aforesaid 909.53 acres for a distance of 2602.41 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING" within these metes and bounds 1560.40 acres, more or less, situated in and a part of the Hugh McGuffin Survey, Abstract No. 43, Jackson County, Texas, and the Phillip Dimmit Survey, Abstract No. 11, Calhoun . County, Texas. The foregoing DESCRIPTION was prepared from an actual on the ground survey made under my direction and supervision in August 1987, and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. EE ON�CH REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR No. 1840 • NOTE: 1) This survey was made without the aid of Title Search or Title Report. 2) No easements were located. 0250-939 Revised October 28, 1987 P-3 495 6.59 Acres STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN Part of the Survey, A-11, Texas. Phillip Dimmit Calhoun County, FIELDNOTE DESCRIPTION of a tract or parcel of land containing 6.59 acres situated in and a part of the Phillip Dimmit Survey, A-11, Calhoun County, Texas. Said 6.59 acres also being in and a part of that same 255.711 acre tract of land conveyed .._,.--. from the Aluminum Company of America to Formosa Plastics Corp- oration, U.S.A. in a deed dated June 16, 19BO and recorded in volume 329, pages 785-796 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas. This 6.59 acres is more fully described by metes and -- bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the North line of the afore- mentioned 255.11 acre tract for the West corner of this 6.59 acre tract being described. Said point bears N 61 deg. 41' E 27.80 feet from a 5/8 inch iron rod found set in concrete marking a point of angle to the left in said North line of aforesaid conveyance; THENCE, N 61*deg. 41' E pass at 1280.76 feet a 5/8 inch iron rod found in concrete and for a total distance of 1514.03 feet to the center of Cox's - Creek to a point for corner; THENCE, S 05 deg 53' 25" W with the center of Cox's - Creek a distance of 79.04 feet; THENCE, S 30 deg. 41' 37" E continuing with said center of Cox's Creek for a distance of 84.77 feet to a point - in the North line of State Highway No. 35; - THENCE, S 61 deg. 41' 00" W with said North line of State Highway No. 35 for a distance of 177.75 feet to a concrete right-of-way monument found for corner; THENCE. S 28 deg. 19' 00" E for a distance of 50.00 feet to a concrete right-of-way monument found for . corner; THENCE, S 61 deg. 41' 00" W with said North line of State Highway No. 35 for a distance of 1295.41 feet to a point for corner; THENCE. N 28 deg. 19' 00" W for a distance of 200.07 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING within these metes and bounds 6.59 acres situated in and a part of the Phillip Dimmit Survey, A-11, Calhoun County, Texas. These FIELDNOTES were based on a survey made on the ground under my supervision on May 1979 and January 1982, and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. / Telmond E. ' uCh- Registered Public Surveyor No. IB40 Revised October 28, 1987 � 1 L C J E 496 Dock Property 18.09 Acres, More or Less Description No. 3 STATE OF TEXAS 1 • COUNTY OF CALHOUN i Being in and a part of the Thomas Cox Survey, Abstract No. 10, Calhoun County, Texas. FIELDNOTE DESCRIPTION: Being 18.09 acres, more or less, situated in and a part of the Thomas Cox Survey, Abstract No. 10, Calhoun County, Texas. Said 18.09 acres, more or less, is in and a part of that certain tract or parcel of land described as the First Tract (3062.40 acres, more or less) in a Deed conveyed from H.C. Smith and wife, Frankie Smith and W.H. Bauer and wife, Marjorie Bauer to the Aluminum Company of America recorded in Volume 61, page 321 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas. This 18.09 acres, more or less, is more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/4 inch iron rod found in the Southeast line of Farm -to -Market Highway No. 1593, for the North corner of this 18.09 acres being described, also being the West corner of a 2.18 acre tract (a 70, wide road easement) described in Volume 256, page 478 of the Deed Records of Calhoun County, Texas; THENCE, S it degrees 06' 30" E along the West line of said 2.18 acres a distance of 1337.04 feet to a 1/4 inch iron rod found in the Phillip G. Young Shoreline Survey of 1948 for the Southeast corner of the herein described 18.09 acres; THENCE, N 86 degrees 58' 50" W with the 1948 Shoreline Survey a distance of 34.58 feet to a point for a corner of this 18.09 acres being described; THENCE, N 84 degrees 28' 50" W continuing with 1948 • Shoreline Survey a distance of 277.78 feet to a point for corner of the herein described 18.09 acres; THENCE, N 87 degrees 58' 50" W with 1948 Shoreline Survey a distance of 558.34 feet to a point for a corner of this 18.09 acres being described; THENCE, S 83 degrees 46' 10" W a distance of 267.11 feet to a point for the Southwest corner of the herein described 18.09 acres; THENCE, N 01 degree 04' 30" W a distance of 207.68 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for a corner of this 18.09 acres being described; THENCE, N 18 degrees 13' 50" W a distance of 213.13 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set in the South line of Farm -to -Market Highway No. 1593 for the Northwest corner of the herein described 18.09 acres; THE*•nF ,,;tti the S'•'tt "� ^f Farm-to-'fark^t 1593 with a curve to the left with the following curve data: delta = 58 degrees 55' 5300, radius 1316.28 feet and an arc length 1353.86 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING within these metes and bounds 18.09 acres, more or less, situated in and a part of the Thomas Cox Survey, Abstract No. 10, Calhoun County, Texas. • Exhibit 497 The foregoing FIELDNOTE DESCRIPTION was prepared from an actual on the ground survey made under my direction and supervision in December 1988, and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. #251.011 TELMOND E. TUCH • REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR NO. 1840 is C� 498 FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP., TEXAS -UNRESTRICTED GIFT TO CALHOUN COUNTY A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that Calhoun County accept the unrestricted gift of $750,000.00 from Chairman Y.C. Wang, Formosa Plastics Corp.,Texas and that the County Judge convey our appreciation to Chairman Wang for the gift. • P. O. BOX 700 201 FORMOSA DRIVE POINT COMFORT, TEXAS 77978 � J The Hon. Howard G. Hartzog County'Judge Calhoun County Courthouse 211 S. Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Judge Hartzog, PHONE: 5121987-7000 FAX: 512/987-2721 August 12, 1991 On behalf of Chairman Y.C. Wang, I am pleased to announce a donation of the sum of $750,000.00 cash, to be payable in three equal annual installments of $250,000.00 each. The first installment will be paid on or before January 31, 1992, with equal installments to be paid on or before January 31, 1993 and January 31, 1994. Chairman Wang is most appreciative of the Commissioners Court's willingness to provide new tax abatement for the FPC, Texas projects which are currently not granted construction permits by the Texas Air Control Board in Calhoun County. Please accept this unrestricted gift to the County as an expression of the Chairman's appreciation for the Commissioner Court's willingness to grant tax abatement for the aforementioned projects and to help the County with any financial needs that it might have during the next three years. Sincerely yours, ck Wu Vice President Business Development 499 T 9301P..e o1 Albmq: Nl612:211-8 VLIU! ULVMtlE RU. IIIC.. Lew 01.11. YVtlLI S11L R4 IRPn:obi all ,men by dra'Present.5, That I, FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, TEXAS as principal residing at 9 Peach Tree Hill Road, Livingston, Essex County, New Jersey (07039) sometimes referred to as "I" or "my" do hereby constitute and appoint, JACK WU, an individual, sometimes referred to as "You" residingat 201 Formosa Avenue, Point Comfort, Calhoun County, Texas (77978) my true and lawful attorney for me, and in my name, place and stead, to do each and every act• which I could personally do for the following uses and purposes: 1. I hereby authorize JACK WU, to make the promises and to execute and deliver that certain LETTER bearing date of August 12, 1991 addressed to THE HON. HOWARD G. HARTZOG, COUNTY JUDGE, CALHOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 211 S. ANN STREET, PORT LAVACA, TEXAS 77979 providing for a cash donation to THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN, TEXAS of $750,000.00 to be payable in three (3) equal annual installments of $250,000.00, with the first installment being due on or before January 31, 1992 and subsequent equal install- ments to be paid on or before January 31, 1993 and January 31, 1994. 2. Generally, to do, execute and perform any other act, matter or thing whatsoever, that, in your opinion, ought to be done, executed and performed in connection with the foregoing matter, as I could do if personally present to effectuate the action and actions contemplated thereby. • giving and granting unto my said attorney full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and pur- poses as I might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution and revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my said attorney or substitute shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. and I ratify all that which You have done on my behalf, all in • reference to the effectuating of the foregoing and only with respect IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set myhapd/�nd seal on Ax1{ust_ 12, .",'..•_l :, �991 Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of AtlL- ANN H. ROSS ..................... 'R...,..._... ' 'M. c-... ClIARLES McA Vice President and etarY. • 'If you want this power to continue in effect if you become disabled or incapacitated, insert the following: "This power of attorney shall not be affected by my becoming disabled or incapacitated." *If you want this power to become effective only in the event of subsequent disability or incapacity, insert the following: "This power of attorneyticome ffec v in the vent of my subsequent disability or incapacity." see NIS46: PREPAREDseside. - 5V AN ATTORNEY -AT -LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JEW' STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF ESSEX } ss.: BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 12 th day of August , 19 91 , before me, the subscriber,a Notary Public State of New Jersey, personally appeared CHARLES H. McAULIFFE who, I am satisfied, is the principal mentioned in, and who executed the within power of attorney and ac- knowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered the same as his act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein expressed. of this Corporation, ; �.I NOTARY __ UBLT. C ,'•.MG�71RVI�i1�i1C� �,�� �If Ialen �>�, t6e 1�B! z 0 H rH O O U H �+ N Q 1L E, 6 y y N N b0 O to m Q 46:29-8. Power of attorney unaffected by disability of principal according to Its terms, accountability to guardian{ disability defined • a. Whenever a principal designates another his attorney in fact or agent by a power of attorney in writing and the writing contains the words "This power of attorney shall not be affected by disability of the principal," or "This power of attorney shall become effective upon the disability of the principal," or similar words showing the intent of the principal that the authority conferred shall be exercisable notwithstanding his disability, the authority of the attorney in fact or agent is exercisable by him as provided in the power on behalf of the principal notwithstanding later disability or incapacity of the principal at law or later uncertainty as to whether the principal is dead or alive. All acts done by the attorney in fact or agent pursuant to the. power during any period of disability or incompetence or uncertainty as to whether the principal is dead or alive have the same effect and inure to the benefit of and bind the principal or his heir,, dovisees and personal representative as if the principal were olive, competent and not disabled. If a guardian is appointed for the principal, the attorney in fact or agent, during the continuance of the appointment, shall account to the guardian rather than the principal, The guardian has the same power the principal would havo had to revoke the power of attorney or agency. It. A principal shall be under a disability if he is unable to manage his property and affairs effectively for reasons such as mental illness, mental deficiency, physical illness or dis ty, advanced age, chronic use of drugs, chronic intr for,, confinement, detention by a foreign r^war, or disappearance, 541 DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 6 - COMMISSIONERS A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the following be appointed Commissioners for two year terms: Larry Marek, George Elder and Key Schwarting. DRAINAGE DISTRICT M. 10 - COMMISSIONERS A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following be appointed Commissioners for two year terms: Richard Williams, George Duncan, Jr. and Andrew Hahn. Commissioner Hahn abstained. TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE-INTERLOCAL SERVICES AGREEMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the court approve the Interlocal Services Agreement with Texas Parks 6 Wildlife and the County Judge be authorized to sign same. Contract Number: INTERLOCAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS Agreement made and entered into this 1st day of September, 1991, by and between the TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT ("Department") and Calhoun County, each acting by and through duly authorized officials, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Department requires the services indicated below to adequately operate and maintain the boat ramp facility described herein for the benefit of the public, and WHEREAS, the Contractor is willing to provide such services under the terms and conditions set out below; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Contractor shall during the term hereof remove and dispose of any and all trash, garbage, and litter of every description located on the boat ramp premises described at Exhibit A, attached hereto made a part hereof for all purposes ("Premises"). The Contractor shall visit and inspect the Premises as often as necessary to ensure a clean and litter free condition, but in any event at least once a week. 2. The Contractor shall during the term hereof mow the portion of the grassy area of the Premises situated within fifty feet of the improvements (boat ramp and parking lot). The above -described area shall be mowed to maintain grass at a height not to exceed six inches. 3. The term of this Agreement is from September 1, 1991 to August 31, 1993, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. As full compensation for the above -described services of the Contractor, the Contractor agrees to accept and the Department agrees to pay the sum of $1,980.00, per year payable in equal quarterly payments, all such payments due after services have been performed for that calendar quarter. All such payments shall be remitted to the address of the Contractor shown at Paragraph 6 below. 5. This agreement is subject to cancellation, without penalty, if funds are not appropriated by the Texas. Legislative, or otherwise made available, to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 6. All notices required hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly given if and when the same are. reduced to writing and enclosed in a 5�r) properly sealed envelope and deposited prepaid in a United States w. post office addressed as follows: 0` If to the Contractor: Calhoun County 211 South Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77079 If to the Department: Grants -in -Aid Branch/Boat Ramp 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 The parties have the right to change their addresses by giving at least fifteen days written notice to the other party of the new address. It is understood and agreed that the Department shall have the right and the right is expressly reserved to declare this Agreement terminated at the option of the Department upon the breach by Contractor of any of the conditions contained herein; provided however that Department shall give contractor written notice as provided herein, of such intention to terminate and the reason(s) therefore, and Contractor shall have thirty days after such notice is mailed to rectify the breach to the satisfaction of the Department. 8. Contractor shall indemnify and hold the Department harmless from and against any claims of any character of all persons whomsoever which result directly or indirectly from the activities by the Contractors of the Premises covered by this Agreement. The parties agree that suit may be brought for the purpose of enforcing any of the provisions of this Agreement in any court of Travis County, Texas. D—/'�-'%/ (Date) 0 TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT By Dan G. Mayfield Director of Finance (Date) 503 EXHIBIT "A" TO SERVICES AGREEMENT The City/County agrees to arrange for the disposal of trash and garbage of every nature and description on a weekly basis, or more often if necessary, and agrees to maintain grass at a height not to exceed six (6) inches at the following described boat ramp(s); PROJECT NUMBER LOCATIO SBF 66-13-41-29 On the Intracoastal Canal SBF 71-13-209-29 On the San Antonio Bay at Swain Point 504 • CONTRACT- TEXAS DEPT. OF HEALTH AND CALHOUN COUNTY -HEALTH DEPT. A motion was -made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the contract/agreement between Calhoun County and the Texas Dept. of Health be approved and the County Judge be authorized to sign same. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CONTRACT 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas .78756-3199 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS TDH Document No. C2000392 This contract is between the Texas Department of Health, hereinafter referred to as RECEIVING AGENCY, and the party listed below as PERFORMING AGENCY and includes general provisions and attachments detailing scope(s) of work and special provisions. I PERFORMING AGENCY: CALHOUN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ) (PRINT or TYPE) Mailing Address: 117 W. Ash Port Lavaca TX 77979 00001 ( ity (SE) (zip) Street Address: SAME i TTf_di. eren 1 y (SE) iPJ—I _______________________________________________________________`-------------====j ----------------------------------------- Authorized I Contracting Entity: CALHOUN COUNTY • I--------------------------1--erenfromPERPORMING AGENCY) --------'------------------------_ I Payee Name: CALHOUN COUNTY TREASUR uRE s match witI ven or identification number shown a ow) Payee Address: RCourthouse Port Lavaca TX 77979 00001 Mustt match with vendor i entification num er s own eloow State of Texas Vendor Identification No. (14 digits): 17460019 MO17 I Finance Officer/Contact: Ethel Jecker ) Type of Organization: CountI Designate: Elementary/secan ary school, Junior college, senior co ege university I city, county, other political subdivisioncouncil of governments, judicial district, community services program, individual, or other (define) Is this a small business No (Yes/No) and/or minority/woman owned No (Yes/No) Is this a non-profit business _ (Yes/No) PAYEE AGENCY Fiscal Year Ending Month: DECEMDER I SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION: I I I I I Contract for public health services. I I - I I I I 1 I COVER - Page 1 505 DETAILS OF ATTACNNBMTS Att/I ; Linancial Assistance _ ' ' An. ?DR Term ; Source of Direct Total Assistance No. program ; Begin End ; Funds$ ; Amount Assistance ; Amount (TOM Share) ; 01 CRH-LHS ; 9/ 1/91;8/31/92: 93,269 STATE 40,920.00; 40,488.00: 81,408.00; 02 NCR-LHS 9/ 1/91: 8/31/92: 93.998 31,363,00; DO; J1,363.00 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 , ' , , I 1 1 I I • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 . 1 = TOM Document No. C2000392 TOTALS ; . S 72,283.00; S 80,188.00; 112,791.00, ' $Federal funds are indicated by a number from the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance jCFDAj, ff applicable, RUIR TO BUDGET SECTION OF ANY ZERO AMOUNT ATTACHMENT FOR DETAILS. COVER - Page 2 5J6 EMOTED IN DUPLICATE ORIGINALS ON TOR DATES SHOWN. • CALHOUN COUNTY TOR Document No.: C D2 D039Z Authorized Contracting Entity (type above if different from PERFORMING AGENCYI for and in behalf of: CALHOUN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PBRPORKINC�1GBRCT By: 'Y z, - (Signature of person authorized to sign contracts) TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RECEIVING AGENCY By: (Signature of person authorized to sign contracts) Howard G. Hartzog ,Cou n ty Judge Roy L. Mogan, Assistant Deputy Calhoun County Commissioner for Administration (Name and Title) (Name and Title) Date: August 12, 1991 RECOMMENDED: • By: (PERFORNING AGENCY Director, if different from person authorised to sign contract) • Date: APPROVED AS TO FORE: BY: Office of General Counsel COVER - Page B 507 • GENERAL. PROVISIONS FOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CONTRACTS ` PERFORMING AGENCY and RECEIVING AGENCY agree this contract, assurances, general and/or special provisions, and attachment(s) with detailed ecope(s) of work and budget(s), as applicable, incorporate all covenants and agreements pertaining hereto. No prior agreement or understanding, oral or otherwise, of the parties or their agents will be valid or enforceable unless embodied in this contract. The person or persons signing and executing this contract on behalf of PERFORMING AGENCY, or representing themselves as signing and executing this contract on behalf of PERFORMING AGENCY, do hereby warrant and guarantee that he, she, or they have been duly authorized by PERFORMING AGENCY to execute this contract on behalf of PERFORMING AGENCY and to validly and•"legally bind PERFORMING AGENCY to all terms, performances, and provisions herein set forth. PERFORMING AGENCY hereby assures compliance with the following terms and conditions unless otherwise specified in the attachment(s) hereto: ARTICLE 1. Sco a of Bork PERFORMING AGENCY will perform the work outlined in the Scope(s) of Work • contained in the attachment(s) hereto which is/are referenced in the Details of Attachments and hereby incorporated and made a part of this contract, plus amendments which may be added by additional attachment(s) from time to time as hereinafter provided. Satisfactory performance of this contract will be measured in part by: (1) adherence to the contract; (2) results of CPA or State Auditor reports; and, 3) timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of required reports. ARTICLE 2. Term The time period of this contract will be governed by the term(s) on the attachment(s). No commitment of contract funds .is permitted prior to the first day nor subsequent to the last day of the term. The term may be extended or shortened by amendment(s). ARTICLE 3. Fundin¢ This contract is contingent upon funding being available for the term of the attachment(s) and PERFORMING AGENCY" will have no right of action against RECEIVING AGENCY in the event that RECEIVING AGENCY is unable to perform its obligations under this contract as a result of the suspension, termination withdrawal, or failure of funding to RECEIVING AGENCY or lack of sufficient funding of RECEIVING AGENCY for any attachment(s) to this contract. If funds become unavailable, provisions of the Termination Article will apply. ARTICLE 4. Amendments • This contract may be amended, and such amendments will be in writing and duly executed by the parties hereto. 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 1 (5/91) 5018 ARTICLE 5. Severability If any provision of this contract will be construed to be illegal or invalid, this will not affect the legality or validity of any of the other provisions hereof. The illegal or invalid provision will be deemed stricken and deleted herefrom to the same extent and effect as if never incorporated herein, but all other provisions will continue. • ARTICLE 6. Applicable Laws and Standards This contract will be governed by the laws of the State of Texas and enabling state/federal regulations, including federal grant requirements, applicable to funding sources as set out in attachment(s) hereto, and Treasury Circular 1075 (11 CFR Part 205) as applicable to advance of funds. If PERFORMING AGENCY is a local governmental public health entity, this contract will also be,governedby the Local Public Health Reorganization Act, Chapter 121, Health and Safety Code. PERFORMING,, AGENCY agrees Article 4413 (32g), V.T.C.S., (Uniform Grant and Contract Management Standards Manual (UGCMS)], as may be amended by revised federal circulars to be incorporated in UGCMS by the Governor's Budget and Planning Office, applies as terms and conditions of this contract, and the standards are adopted by reference in their entirety. If a conflict arises between the provisions of this contract and UGCMS, the provisions of UGCMS will prevail unless expressly stated otherwise. A copy of this manual and its references are provided to PERFORMING AGENCY by RECEIVING AGENCY upon request. PERFORMING AGENCY must obtain prior approval from RECEIVING AGENCY for major project changes which are specified in RECEIVING AGENCY's institutional prior approval procedures. These procedures are incorporated by reference as a condition of this contract. In accordance with Section 1352 of Public Law 101-121, effective December 22, • 1989, PERFORMING AGENCY is prohibited from using funds granted under this contract for lobbying Congress or any agency in connection with a particular contract. In addition, if at any time, the contract exceeds $100,000, the law requires certification that none of the funds provided by RECEIVING AGENCY to PERFORMING AGENCY have been used for payment to lobbyists. Regardless of funding source, and if a contract exceeds $100,000, a disclosure form must be completed if PERFORMING AGENCY has any agreement with a lobbyist. This certification and/or form is available upon request and must be forwarded to RECEIVING AGENCY within 90 days of receipt. PERFORMING AGENCY certifies by execution of this contract that its payment of franchise taxes is current or, if PERFORMING AGENCY is exempt from payment of franchise taxes, that it is not subject to the State of Texas franchise tax. A false statement regarding franchise tax status will be treated as a material breach of this contract and may be grounds for termination at the option of RECEIVING AGENCY. If franchise tax payments become delinquent during the attachment term, payments under this contract will be held until PERFORMING AGENCY's delinquent franchise tax is paid in full. PERFORMING AGENCY further certifies by execution of this contract that it is not ineligible for participation in federal or state assistance programs under 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 2 (5/91) 5019 Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension. PERFORMING AGENCY • specifically asserts that it does not owe a single substantial debt or a number of outstanding debts to a federal or state agency. A false statement regarding PERFORMING AGENCY's status will be treated as a material breach of this contract and may be grounds for termination at the option of RECEIVING AGENCY. ARTICLE 7. Assurances PERFORMING AGENCY assures that no person will, on the grounds of race, creed, color, handicap, disability, national origin, sex, political affiliation or beliefs, be excluded from, be denied the benefit of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part under this agreement. Incorporated by reference the same as if specifically written herein are the rules, regulations, and all other requirements imposed by law including, but not limited to, compliance with -those pertinent rules and regulations of the State of Texas and those of United States agencies providing funds to the State of Texas. PERFORMING AGENCY assures it will not transfer or assign its interest in this contract without written consent of the the RECEIVING AGENCY. ARTICLE S. Standards For Financial Management PERFORMING AGENCY will develop, implement, and maintain financial management • and control systems that meet or exceed the requirements of UGCMS. Those requirements include at a minimum: 1. Financial planning including the development of budgets that adequately reflect all functions and resources necessary to carry out authorized activities and the adequate determination of costs; 2. Financial management system including accurate, correct, and complete payroll, accounting, and financial reporting records, cost source documentation, effective internal and budgetary controls, determination of reasonableness, allowability, and allocability of costs, and timely and appropriate audits and resolution of any findings; and, 3. Billing and collection policies including a charge schedule, a system for discounting or adjusting charges based on a person's income and family size, and a mechanism capable of billing and making reasonable efforts to collect from patients and third parties. ARTICLE 9. Allowable Costs Only those costs allowable under UGCMS and OMB Circular A-110, and any revisions thereto, plus any applicable federal cost principles are eligible for reimbursement under this contract. Applicable coat principles. and audit requirements are as follows: Circular Applicable Cost Principles Audit Requirement A-87 State 6 Local Governments Circular A-128 • To be eligible for reimbursement under this contract, a cost must have been 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 3 (5191) 510 incurred within the attachment term and paid by PERFORMING AGENCY prior to claiming reimbursement from RECEIVING AGENCY or encumbered by the,last day of the attachment term and liquidated no later than 45 days after the end of the • attachment term. Each PERFORMING AGENCY/AUTHORIZED CONTRACTING ENTITY receiving $25,000; or more in total federal/state financial assistance during their fiscal year shall arrange for an agency -wide financial and compliance audit of the PERFORMING AGENCY'S/AUTHORIZED CONTRACTING ENTITY'S fiscal year. The audit„must be conducted by an independent CPA and must be in accordance with the applicable OMB Circulars and Government Auditing Standards. Procurement of audit services will comply with state procurement procedures, as well ae provisions of UGCMS. Within 30 days of receipt of audit report, PERFORMING AGENCY/AUTHORIZED CONTRACTING ENTITY will submit a copy to RECEIVING AGENCY'S Internal Audit Division. ARTICLE 10. Overtime Compensation None of the funds provided by attachment(s) will be used to pay overtime. PERFORMING AGENCY will be responsible for any obligations of overtime pay due employees. ARTICLE 11. Terms and Conditions of Payment For services satisfactorily performed pursuant to the Scope(s) of Work, PERFORMING AGENCY will receive, reimbursement for allowable costs. Reimbursements will not exceed the total of each attachment(s) hereto and are • contingent on a signed contract. Claims for reimbursement will be made on a State of Texas Purchase Voucher (TDH Form {AG-37). Vouchers for reimbursement of actual expenses will be submitted monthly within 20 days following the end of the month covered by the bill. A make-up claim may be submitted as a final close-out bill not later than 45 days following the end of attachment term(s). Advance payment may be requested in accordance with the applicable provisions of this contract. Payments made for approved claims or notice of denial of claims submitted against attachment(s) to this contract will be mailed not later than 60 days after receipt of monthly vouchers. Payment is considered made on the date postmarked. Any reimbursements made by PERFORMING AGENCY to subcontractors will be made in accordance with Article 601f, V.T.C.S. Funding from this contract will not be used to supplant state or local funds, but PERFORMING AGENCY will use such funds to increase state or local funds currently available to PERFORMING AGENCY for a particular. activity. PERFORMING AGENCY further agrees to maintain to the best of its ability its current level of support, if any. PERFORMING AGENCY will refund to RECEIVING AGENCY any funds PERFORMING AGENCY claims and receives from RECEIVING AGENCY for the reimbursement of ,Coats which are determined by RECEIVING AGENCY to be ineligible for reimbursement:.,. RECEIVING AGENCY will have the right to withhold all or part of any .future • 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 4 (5/91) 511 payment's to PERFORMING AGENCY to offset any reimbursement made to PERFORMING • AGENCY for any ineligible expenditures not refunded to RECEIVING AGENCY by PERFORMING AGENCY. Payment may be denied for noncompliance if required financial reports are not on file for previous quarters or for the final period, or for failure to respond to financial compliance monitoring reports, or if program requirements are not met as specified in the Scope(s) of Work. ARTICLE 12. Advance Payments PERFORMING AGENCY may request, in writing, a one time advance with proper justification and the concurrence of RECEIVING AGENCY. Amount of advance will be determined by the amount and term of the attachment(s); however, for each attachment, the amount of the advance will not exceed one -sixth (1/6th) of a twelve-month attachment. Advance will be requested on a State of Texas Purchase Voucher at the beginning of attachment period or at a single later time in the attachment period if circumstances so warrant and the request is approved. Advance funds will be liquidated during the attachment' term so that, after final monthly billing, PERFORMING AGENCY will not have advance funds on hand. Advance funds may be drawn only to meet immediate cash needs for disbursement (UGCMS and federal circulars). Amendments to this contract may require upward or downward adjustment to the allowable advance until it equates 1/6th of a twelve-month attachment or approximates two .months operating costs. In the case of a downward adjustment, PERFORMING AGENCY and RECEIVING AGENCY will agree on the amount of adjustment to the advance. RECEIVING AGENCY retains the option to reduce • future claims by the required amount. In the case of an upward adjustment and PERFORMING AGENCY needs additional funds to meet immediate operating expenses, PERFORMING AGENCY may submit to RECEIVING AGENCY a written justification and State of Texas Purchase Voucher in the amount necessary to correct the ratio. ARTICLE 13. Proaram Income PERFORMING AGENCY will develop a fee for service system and a schedule of fees for personal health services in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12, Sub -chapter . D, Health and Safety Code, and the Texas Board of Health rules covering Fees for Clinical Health Services (25 TAC, Sec. 1.91) and other applicable laws provided, however, that a patient may not be denied a service due to inability to pay. All revenues received from the delivery of contract services will be identified, reported, and utilized as provided in this article. Such program income will be retained by PERFORMING AGENCY and: (1) be used by PERFORMING AGENCY for any purposes which further the objectives of the program and the Scope of Work for the attachment(s) and be deducted from total project costs; or, (2) be deducted from total project costs. This is according to RECEIVING AGENCY policy interpreting UGCMS, a copy of policy is provided on request and is incorporated by reference as a condition of this contract. 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS -.Page 5 (5/91) • 514, ARTICLE 14. Financial Reports Financial reports are required as provided in UGCMS and will be filed regardless of whether or not expenses have been incurred. Quarterly • Financial Status Report, State of Texas Supplemental Form-'269e. (TDN Form GC-4a), will be submitted within 20 days following the end of each quarter. Annual/Final A final financial report, Request for Advance or Reimbursement, Form 270 (TON Form GC-10) will be submitted not later than 45 days following the end of attachment term(s). If necessary, a State of Texas Purchase Voucher will be submitted if all costs have not been recovered or a refund will be made of excess monies if costs incurred were less than funds received. ARTICLE 15. Reports and Inspections PERFORMING AGENCY will submit financial, program, progress, and other reports as requested by RECEIVING AGENCY in the format agreed to by the parties hereto. RECEIVING AGENCY and, when federal funds are involved, any authorized representatives) of the federal government have the right, at all 'reasonable times, to inspect or otherwise evaluate the work performed or being performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed,' including subcontractors. PERFORMING AGENCY will participate in and provide reasonable access, facilities, and assistance to the representatives. All inspections and evaluations will be performed in such a manner is will not 'unduly delay the work. IsPERFORMING AGENCY agrees that RECEIVING AGENCY and the federal government, or any of their duly authorized representatives, will have access to any pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of PERFORMING AGENCY for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcripts of transactions related to contract attachment(s). RECEIVING AGENCY -will have the right to audit billings both before and after payment. Payment under attachment(s) will not foreclose the right of RECEIVING AGENCY. to 'recover excessive or illegal payments. Any deficiencies identified by RECEIVING AGENCY upon examination of PERFORMING AGENCY's records will be conveyed in writing to PERFORMING AGENCY:t-PERFORMING AGENCY's resolution of findings will also be conveyed in writing to RECEIVING AGENCY within 30 days of receipt of RECEIVING AGENCY's findings''', A determination by RECEIVING AGENCY of either an inadequate or inappropriate resolution of the findings may result in the withholding of funds or suspension of the contract attachment(s). Any such withholding 'of funds or suspension will remain in effect until the findings are properl remedied as determined by RECEIVING AGENCY. "� r"•;med ). rr; 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 6 (5/91) 5113 PERFORMING AGENCY will retain all such records for a period of three years from the date of the last expenditure report submitted under contract' attachment(s) or until resolution of all audit questions, whichever time period is longer. ARTICLE 16. Client Records At the end of the PERFORMING AGENCY. records or obtain may arise. attachment term, all client records are the property of RECEIVING AGENCY retains the right to have access to the copies for audit, litigation, or other circumstances that If at any time during the attachment term(s), PERFORMING AGENCY and/or RECEIVING AGENCY should decide to terminate the agreement, RECEIVING AGENCY may require the transfer of client records upon written notice to PERFORMING AGENCY. Records may be transferred to another entity that agrees to continue the service or, at the option of RECEIVING AGENCY, the, records may be transferred to RECEIVING AGENCY headquarters. ARTICLE 17. Confidentiality PERFORMING AGENCY will have a system in effect to protect from inappropriate disclosure of patient records and all other documents deemed confidential by law which are maintained in connection with the activities funded under contract attachment(s). Any disclosure of confidential patient information by PERFORMING AGENCY, including information required by the Reports and Inspections Article, will be in accordance with applicable law. If providing direct client care, services, or programs, PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to implement workplace policies based on the model guidelines adopted by RECEIVING AGENCY and to educate employees and clients concerning the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and its related conditions including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to develop and implement policies regarding confidentiality of AIDS and HIV -related medical information for employees of PERFORMING AGENCY and for clients, inmates, patients, and residents served by PERFORMING AGENCY. Further, PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to develop andimplement an anti -discrimination policy assuring all privileges and opportunities for any employee or client with a communicable disease. HIV -related policies will be based on accurate scientific information. Such policies will be consistent with the model guidelines published by RECEIVING AGENCY and with state and federal laws and regulations. A PERFORMING AGENCY that does not adopt a confidentiality policy as herein required is not legally eligible to receive state funds until the policy is developed and implemented. ARTICLE 18. Equipment and Supplies Equipment is defined as tangible nonexpendable property with an acquisition cost of over $500 and a useful life of more than one year. In accordance with Article 601b, V.T.C.S., Section 8.02(c), title to all equipment purchased from funds provided herein will be in the name of PERFORMING AGENCY throughout the attachment(s) term(s). Unless initially listed and approved in the attachment(s), prior written approval from RECEIVING AGENCY is required for any additions to or deletions 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 7 (5/91) • • Ll 514 11 • of approved equipment purchases having an acquisition cost exceeding $500. To receive approval for data processing hardware and software purchases with an acquisition cost over $500, PERFORMING AGENCY must submit a detailed justification which includes description of features, make and model, and cost, etc, PERFORMING AGENCY will maintain an annual property and inventory listing and submit a report (TDH Form GC-11) to RECEIVING AGENCY not later than 45 days from the end of the attachment(s).term(s). PERFORMING AGENCY will administer a program of maintenance, repair, and protection of assets under this attachment(s) so as to assure their full availability and usefulness. In the event PERFORMING AGENCY is indemnified, reimbursed, or otherwise compensated for any loss of, destruction of, or damage to the assets provided under this attachment(s), it will use the proceeds to repair or replace said assets. PERFORMING AGENCY agrees that upon termination of attachment(s), title to any remaining equipment purchased from funds as hereinabove provided will be transferred to the RECEIVING AGENCY or any other party designated by the RECEIVING AGENCY; provided, however, that RECEIVING; AGENCY may,at its option and to the extent allowed by law, transfer title to such property, to the PERFORMING AGENCY. ARTICLE 19. Subcontracting PERFORMING AGENCY may enter into agreements with subcontractors unless restricted or otherwise prohibited in specific attachment(s).. Subcontracts, if any, entered into by PERFORMING AGENCY will be in writing and subject to the requirements of this contract. PERFORMING AGENCY agrees that it will be responsible to RECEIVING AGENCY for the performance of any subcontractor. In addition, if PERFORMING AGENCY elects to enter into an agreement which subcontracts out a substantial portion of PERFORMING AGENCY's Scope of Work, prior written approval must be obtained from RECEIVING AGENCY. ARTICLE 20. Copyrights and Publications PERFORMING AGENCY understands and agrees that where activities supported by the contract attachment(s) produce original books, manuals, films, computer programs (including executable computer programs and supporting data in any form), or other original material, PERFORMING AGENCY may copyright such material subject to any rights to same reserved, by or vested in the federal government or any agency thereof; however, RECEIVING AGENCY ,may grant- to PERFORMING AGENCY limited rights to produce, publish, and use. such�mat'riiis as appropriate. PERFORMING AGENCY may publish at its expense the results 'of contract performance with prior RECEIVING AGENCY review and approval. Any publication (written, visual, or sound) should include acknowledgment of the support received from RECEIVING AGENCY and the appropriate federal.-igency, if applicable. At least three copies of any such publication must be provided to RECEIVING AGENCY. RECEIVING AGENCY reserves the right to require additional copies before or after the initial review. 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 8 (5/91) 1 15 ARTICLE 21. Hold Harmless • PERFORMING AGENCY, which is not a state agency, assures that it is an independent contractor and not an agent, servant, or employee of the state. Except to the extent that Chapter 104 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code is applicable to this contract, PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to hold RECEIVING AGENCY and/or federal government harmless and to indemnify them from and against any and all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character which may be asserted by any third party occurring or in any way incident to, arising out of, or in connection with the performance of services by PERFORMING AGENCY under this contract to the extent allowed by law, and to the extent of damages permitted under Chapter 101 0£ the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. PERFORMING AGENCY, by acceptance of funds provided through contract attachment(s), agrees and ensures that personnel paid from these funds are duly licensed and/or qualified to perform the required services. ARTICLE 22. Bonding Each person employed by PERFORMING AGENCY who handles funds under this contract, including persons authorizing payment of such funds, will be covered by the terms of a fidelity bond providing for indemnification of losses occasioned by: (1) any fraudulent or dishonest act or acts committed by any of PERFORMING AGENCY's employees either individually or in concert with others, and/or, (2) failure of PERFORMING AGENCY or any of its employees to perform faithfully his/her duties or to account properly for all monies and property • received by virtue of his/her position or employment. This fidelity bond will be in the amount of not less than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000). In the event that PERFORMING AGENCY, being an independent contractor, maintains a self-insurance program that provides for the indemnification of losses as described in the above paragraph regarding fidelity bonds, then PERFORMING AGENCY will provide to RECEIVING AGENCY a certified statement which summarizes its self-insurance plan. The certified statement will be submitted at the time this contract is submitted for approval. Any changes to said plan, which occur during the term of this contract period, will be reported to RECEIVING AGENCY. The self-insurance program should be based on -the determination that the coverage can be provided at a cost no greater than the cost of obtaining equivalent coverage from an insurance company. ARTICLE 23. Suanension/Termination If PERFORMING AGENCY fails to comply with RECEIVING AGENCY's reporting requirements, the program objectives, or the contract award' conditions, RECEIVING AGENCY may withhold payments. RECEIVING AGENCY will provide advance written notice to PERFORMING AGENCY which will identify the deficiency and RECEIVING AGENCY's intent to withhold payments if the deficiency is not corrected within a specific number of days. When the deficiency is corrected, RECEIVING AGENCY will release any withheld payments with no further action. If PERFORMING AGENCY fails to comply with the terms, conditions, or:standards of this contract, RECEIVING AGENCY may suspend the contract attachment(s) and prohibit PERFORMING AGENCY from incurring additional obligations of funds is either corrective action or termination. RECEIVING AGENCY will provide written notice to PERFORMING AGENCY at least thirty (30) days in 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS = Page 9 (5/91) 516 advance of the suspension date. Such notice will detail the nature of noncompliance and specify a correction date. PERFORMING AGENCY may request a hearing on the proposed suspension if such request is made in writing within ten (10) days from any final notification of suspension. This contract or any attachment(s) hereto may be terminated by'either of the • parties hereto for noncompliance by the other party. A party intending to terminate for noncompliance by the other party will provide written -notice to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the intended date of termination. Such notice will include the reasons for the termination and will provide the other party an opportunity to rebut 'the reasons, in writing. A hearing may be requested on the proposed termination if such 'request is made in writing within ten (10) days from any final notification of termination. By such termination, neither party may nullify obligations already incurred for performance or failure to perform prior to the date of termination. Such termination will not be an exclusive remedy but will be in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this contract. This contract or any attachment(s) hereto may be terminated in whole, orin part, when both parties agree that continuation would not produce results commensurate with further expenditure of funds. Both parties will agree on the effective data and, in the case of partial termination, the.portion to be terminated. RECEIVING AGENCY will immediately send PERFORMING AGENCY written notice of the terms agreed to and such notice will become• a part of the contract. PERFORMING AGENCY will not incur new obligations for the.terminated portion after the effective date of termination and will. cancel as many outstanding.obligations as possible. RECEIVING AGENCY will allow full credit to PERFORMING AGENCY for noncancelable obligations which were properly incurred prior to the termination date. This contract or any attachment(s) hereto may be terminated if funds allocated for any attachment(s) hereto should become reduced, depleted; or unavailable • during any attachment(s) budget period, and RECEIVING AGENCY is unable to obtain additional funds for such purposes, RECEIVING AGENCY will immediately provide written notification to PERFORMING AGENCY of such fact and such attachment(s) to this contract is/are terminated upon receipt of that notification. PERFORMING AGENCY will not incur new obligations after the effective date of termination and will cancel as many outstanding obligations as possible. RECEIVING AGENCY will allow full credit to PERFORMING AGENCY for noncancelable obligations which were properly incurred prior to the termination date, This contract or any attachment(s) hereto may be terminated in the event that federal or state laws or other requirements should be amended or judicially interpreted so as to render continued fulfillment of this contract, on the part of either party, unreasonable or impossible. If the partiev should be unable to agree upon amendment which would therefore be needed 1to enable the substantial continuation of the services contemplated herein,',then, upon written notification by RECEIVING AGENCY to PERFORMING AGENCY, the parties will be discharged from any further obligations created under"th6 terms of this contract, except for the equitable settlement of the respective accrued interests or obligations as of the date of termination. 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 10 (5/91) • 517 • ARTICLE 24. Personnel All personnel funded by attachment(s) to this contract are employees of PERFORMING AGENCY which will be responsible for their direction and control and liable for any of their acts or omissions. PERFORMING AGENCY will have in place legally sufficient Due Process Hearing Procedures for all of its employees filling state budgeted positions. PERFORMING AGENCY will have full authority to employ, promote, suspend, demote, discharge, and transfer within its organization any and all state _ budgeted personnel funded by attachment(s) to this contract provided, however, that any demotion, suspension, or discharge of such state budgeted employees will be in accordance with the Due Process Hearing Procedures as set out above. The only distinction between state budgeted and local paid employees is that employees on state budgeted positions receive state benefits and are subject to certain duties, obligations, and restrictions as state employees as contained in state law. One such restriction, as contained in the State Appropriations Act, is that no employee paid on a state budgeted position may receive a salary supplement from any source unless specifically authorized in the Appropriations Act or other state law. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, the payment to such employee of a so-called •flat rate- car allowance or travel allowance. Any such travel or per diem to these employees • must be on a reimbursement basis, supported by appropriate records, and may not exceed the reimbursement for mileage and/or per diem allowed under the Appropriations Act and current state travel regulations. This restriction will apply whether travel funds are provided in attachment(s) under this contract or from any other source. PERFORMING AGENCY will utilize RECEIVING AGENCY's policies and procedures for hiring and promoting individuals into state budgeted positions funded by attachment(s) to this contract. qualifications of any individuals filling these positions will be subject to approval of RECEIVING AGENCY's Bureau of Personnel Management. The purpose of the approval is to ensure that individuals occupying these positions meet minimum educational and experience requirements. PERFORMING AGENCY will maintain required records and submit documents necessary to process personnel, payroll, leave and time records, and travel claims on state budgeted positions. PERFORMING AGENCY will be furnished by RECEIVING AGENCY state warrants for salary compensation or travel reimbursement for issuance to employees on state budgeted positions. An independent audit is not required as a condition of this contract if the attachment provides assistance through assignment of state budgeted positions and no funds are budgeted for local costs. PERFORMING AGENCY may be reimbursed for local personnel costs or other categories of expense used to fulfill the scope of work of attachment(s) in lieu of being furnished state payroll warrants after a state budgeted position • becomes vacant. Reimbursement will not exceed the balance of funds on the state budgeted position after all benefits, obligations, and/or other entitlements are met. PERFORMING AGENCY's Director, or other person(s) authorized elsewhere in this contract, may submit a request for conversion. RECEIVING AGENCY will transmit formal approval and a revised budget to 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 11 (5/91) 518 • • PERFORMING AGENCY to complete the conversion. ARTICLE 25. Funding Participation Requirement PERFORMING AGENCY agrees funds provided through this contract will not be used for matching purposes in securing other funding. ARTICLE 26. Performance -Based Attachments History RECEIVING AGENCY is responsible for developing performance -based public health services contracts in response to the State Auditor's Report. „ This system will enhance service delivery and, improve accountability and efficiency in the management of public health dollars. Plans for initial implementation were designed to use the model' objectives format stemming from recommendations of the Committee on Yodel Objectives for Local Public Health in Texas. The committee was composed of 'representatives of local health departments and RECEIVING AGENCY'S central and public health region offices in consultation with the University of Texas School of Public Health in Houston. Purpose The overall goal of performance -based contracts is improved 'public health practices in Texas. The project is.intended to: -identify public health needs and establish priorities which provide a rational basis for resource allocation;. -project realistic outcomes based on activities which can be accomplished with current or planned resources, communicate needs, and build consensus at all levels regarding directions to be taken in specific programs; and, -institute a system for planning, implementing, managing, and evaluating programs and monitoring progress toward reducing and/or alleviating public health problems. Process PERFORMING AGENCY will prepare outcome and process objectives relative to local needs and resources in the following selected 'program areas, if applicable: -AIDS/HIV -Chronic Disease Prevention and Control -Food Protection -Immunization -Maternal and Child Health -Sexually Transmitted Diseases -Tuberculosis -Refugee Health -Hansen's Disease -Other Communicable Disease Epidemiology and Surveillance 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 12 (5/91) 519 -Public Health Promotion -On-Site Wastewater Facility Management By the end of the current state fiscal year, PERFORMING AGENCY will show evidence of a monitoring system to evaluate progress towards the objectives. RECEIVING AGENCY will provide training, written documentation, and ongoing technical assistance to PERFORMING AGENCY in the development of objectives and a monitoring system. RECEIVING AGENCY contact for matters pertaining to the performance -based public health services project is the Office of the Associate Commissioner for Community and Rural Health. It is understood and agreed to by both parties that some objectives may not be met and achievement levels may be different than estimated. The objectives are recognized as test processes and achievement below the established levels will not affect the right of PERFORMING AGENCY to funds provided through Attachment(s) when the basic program scope of work has been fulfilled. Any disputes arising from procedures or actions taken as part of this project will be addressed and resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both parties. 1992 GENERAL PROVISIONS - Page 13 (5(91) • • 520 DOCUMENT NO. C2000392 • ATTACHMENT NO. 01 PERFORMING AGENCY: CALHOUN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RECEIVING AGENCY PROGRAM: COMMUNITY AND RURAL HEALTH TERM: September 1, 1991 THROUGH August 31, 1992 SECTION I. SCOPE OF WORK: PERFORMING AGENCY will use direct assistance and/or financial assistance from RECEIVING AGENCY to supplement the delivery of comprehensive public health services. Comprehensive health services encompass a wide variety of personal health services, environmental health services, and other problems of the jurisdiction. Personal health services may include but are not limited to adult health/chronic disease, AIDS/HIV, chronically ill/disabled children, dental, immunization, laboratory, maternal and child health, public health promotion/education, sexually transmitted disease control, and tuberculosis control. Environmental health services/inspections may include but are not limited to food, premise, swimming pool, vector control, and wastewater control. Other services may be provided as needed when agreed to by both parties. Reports of comprehensive health services performed will be submitted to RECEIVING AGENCY, Community and Rural Health, in a format and time frame agreed upon by both parties. • Direct assistance will be provided by RECEIVING AGENCY to PERFORMING AGENCY for the implementation of an immunization program. The goal of the immunization program is to prevent, control, and eradicate vaccine -preventable disease by providing/administering biologicals, promoting immunization, and applying epidemiologic/outbreak controls within budgetary constraints. This will be accomplished by performing the following activities and reports. A. Investigations/Control Measures PERFORMING AGENCY will investigate 100% of suspected cases of measles, rubella, pertussis, poliomyelitis, and diphtheria within 24 hours after a report is received. PERFORMING AGENCY will investigate 90% of suspected mumps cases and 100% of suspected tetanus cases within 48 hours after a report is received. For the above diseases, PERFORMING AGENCY will implement the most current outbreak control procedures/measures and contact RECEIVING AGENCY, Immuniza- tion Division, within 48 hours after an investigation is initiated. B. Reporting Requirements PERFORMING AGENCY understands that all vaccines used in RECEIVING AGENCY Immunization Programs are purchased with public funds and must be, accounted for the same as other public property. PERFORMING AGENCY further understands that vaccine loss, destruction, spoilage, or other waste, may be investigated • by the RECEIVING AGENCY, Immunization Division, who may then require -1- 54-1 • reimbursement or replacement of the lost vaccines. PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to provide RECEIVING AGENCY, Immunization Division, by January 31st, of each year, a report detailing storage measures and methods used to control vaccine loss including method to monitor and.record daily vaccine storage temperatures. The report shall be submitted in a format provided by RECEIVING AGENCY, Immunization Division. PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to provide RECEIVING AGENCY, Immunization Division, monthly reports of vaccine utilization/loss, within ten working days after the end of each month, on forms provided by RECEIVING AGENCY (forms C5,.C5A, C33, C33A). PERFORMING AGENCY will obtain monthly biological reports from private physician offices and others who receive state supplied biologicals. PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to provide RECEIVING AGENCY, Immunization Division, by September 15th, of each year, a report on the number of people served with immunizations (unduplicated count) and the number of visits for immunizations in the preceding State Fiscal Year. • PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to comply with the following: Texas Immunization Laws, Rules and Regulations; Chapter 42, Human Resources Code; Sections 2.09 & 2.09A, Texas Education Code; and, Section 317 of the PHS Act as amended. PERFORMING AGENCY will provide an estimated clients with services/units of service in or benefiting the county(ies)/area defined as: CALHOUN. SECTION II. LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT: Chapters 12 and 121, Health and Safety Code. SECTION III. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: General Provisions, Program Income Article, paragraph one, is amended to include the following sentence: PERFORMING AGENCY understands that federal law guarantees access to immunization services in public clinics regardless of ability to pay and agrees to post in the waiting room of each immunization clinic the bilingual poster "Fees for Vaccine Administration" (Form 6-36 available from Immunization Division). -2- • 522 • • • SECTION IV. BUDGET: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE Financial assistance involves payment of funds to PERFORMING AGENCY for costs incurred in carrying out approved activities. Personnel $32,724.00 Fringe Benefits 8,196.00 Travel .00 Equipment .00 Supplies .00 Contractual .00 Other .00 Total Direct Costs $40,920.00 Indirect .00 TOTAL $40,920.00 Financial status reports (FSRs) are due the 20th of December, March, June, September and the 15th of October. RECEIVING AGENCY financial assistance will not exceed $40,920.00. 523 • DIRECT ASSISTANCE Direct assistance involves the assignment of state funded positions or the provision of materials or supplies such as vaccines in lieu of cash. Vaccine 40,488.00 TOTAL $40,488.00 Financial status reports (FSRs) are not required on direct assistance. Program income generated from activities supported with direct assistance will be reported on FSRs required for financial assistance provided through this attachment, if applicable, or through other program attachment(s) benefiting from this assistance. RECEIVING AGENCY direct assistance will not exceed $40,488.00. • Total RECEIVING AGENCY assistance will not exceed $81,408.00. -4- • 524 CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS • The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that: (1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or an employee of any agency, a member of congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a member of congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a member of congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-111, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and • contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shaTT.certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Signature Name of Authorized individual Name and Address o Organization • Date Application or Contract Number 525 1. Type of Federal Actlo a. contract 0. grant c. d. cooperative s0 a. ban qquuaram" I. loan Inauranos 4. Natns and Address of Reporting Enttty: ❑ Prime ❑ Tissrr. w�~ . rknonn: Dlstrld, }known: 11. Federal Actlon Number, (known: m 10.1. Has and Address of Lobbying Entty (if/ncW1dua( fast name, &srnams, M 11. Amount of Payment (Check &/that apply): S ❑ Actual ❑planned 12. Form of Payment (check adVWo rply). ❑ a. cash ❑ b. In4dnd; sped/&; nature value b. Initial DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352 (See reverse for public burden disclosurs.) n: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report ? a. bidiaawappuptlan ❑ a. I Initial award b. reertlent I C. pat -award Aac w by 0MS Qa"40�6 W: n filing material change For Material Change Only: year quarter date of lag re an Y i If Reporting Entity In No. 4 IsSubawardo% Enter Name and address of Prime: Congressional Dlstrlct, fknown. 7. Federal Program Name/Description: CFDA Number, It applicable: 11. AwarrtAmoun4 It known: S b. Individuals Performing Services (Includklg address f dfferenf frorn No. r aol (lasrnams, fistnams, MQ: 13. Type of Payment (chock of that apply). a. retainer b. on"me IN a. commission d. contingent tee e. datensd f. other, specify: 14. Brief Description of Ssrvlces Performed orto be Performed and or Momber(s) contacted for Payment Indicated In kern 11: aoac u m „o..,.m, ..•rr..wo sseugn no raa newra•s by Boo.s • 31 u.c. s•aan1352TiWSSC wimoor a awboWrgamrrswwalrwWwlr•p••rwlaa,le• trs won wnm r•sa• aam by ow car Saco@ 1M,•n na earw•aron cow s nwo• or rrr•we Y. T1ss a•easwo a mgwoo prawn a 31 U.3.C. 135i TM o•ame a nW,,M a ow Coact•& ••r1► omwry area re a arusor• for wan arsa•csarl. Mry pa•on wrw as• w No m• r•asrw sacar• •t ract a SwPa10 caww1b a o•nor cos scan 310.00o pus rep ma. am sloo.000 ar •eon •rron tsar•. SF.I r 1,t / twomm" Signature: PrintNama: Tula: Including oHlcer(s), Telephone No.: Data: m • 526 14. Brief Description of Ssrvlces Performed orto be Performed and or Momber(s) contacted for Payment Indicated In kern 11: aoac u m „o..,.m, ..•rr..wo sseugn no raa newra•s by Boo.s • 31 u.c. s•aan1352TiWSSC wimoor a awboWrgamrrswwalrwWwlr•p••rwlaa,le• trs won wnm r•sa• aam by ow car Saco@ 1M,•n na earw•aron cow s nwo• or rrr•we Y. T1ss a•easwo a mgwoo prawn a 31 U.3.C. 135i TM o•ame a nW,,M a ow Coact•& ••r1► omwry area re a arusor• for wan arsa•csarl. Mry pa•on wrw as• w No m• r•asrw sacar• •t ract a SwPa10 caww1b a o•nor cos scan 310.00o pus rep ma. am sloo.000 ar •eon •rron tsar•. SF.I r 1,t / twomm" Signature: PrintNama: Tula: Including oHlcer(s), Telephone No.: Data: m • 526 CONTINUATION SHEET . •. f - AUUMM AN Loral Ntpomu 3W Wd FWn • tII-A 027 • INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-111, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient. at the initiation or receipt of a covered Federal action. or a matenal change to a previous tiling, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. The filing of a form is required for each payment or agraementto make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress. an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member at Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Use the SF. 111-A Cdntlauation Sheet for additional information if the space an the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report. Refer to the irttptementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information. 1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been seared to influence the out come of a covered Federal action. Z, identify the status of covered Federal action. 3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. 0 this Is a followup report caused by a material change to the Into niunion previously reported, enter the year and quarter In which the change scarred. Enter the date Of the last previously submitted report by this reporting entity tortnis covered Federal action. 4. Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District. if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is. or expects to be. a prime or subaward recipient. Identity the tier of the subawerdee, e.g.. the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants S. if the organization tiling the report in item 4 chocks'Subawardes', then enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional Dtatrfct. if known. 0. Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one • organizational level below agency name, If known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. 7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog Of Federal Domestk Assistance (CFDA) number for grams, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments. 0. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action Identified In item 1 (e.g., Request for Proposal (RFP) number, Invitation for Old (IF13) number, gram announcement number, the comma gram, or loan award number, the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Include prefixes. e.g..'RFP-DE-90.001.4 9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of the awarWoan cammltmam for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5. 10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the repotting amity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action. (b) Enter the full names of the Individuals) perfomtlng services, andinclude full address if different from 10 (a). Enter Last Name. First Name, and Middle Initial (Mq. 11. Enferthe amount of compensation paid arreasonabty expected to be paid by the reporting smIty (item 4) to the lobbying entity (item 10). Indicate whether the payment has been made (actual) or will be made (planned). Chock all boxes that apply, if this is a material change report, enter the cumulative amount of payment made or planned to be made. 12 Chock theapproprlatebox(es).Chockallboxesthatadply.IfpaymerttIsmadethroughanin-kindcontribudon,specifythe nature and value of the in -kind payment- 13. Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. It other, specify nature. 14. Provide a specific and detailed description of the services that Me lobbyist has performed, orwillbeexpected topanic rm, and the date(s) of any services rendered Include all preparatory and related activity, not Just time spent In actual contact with Federal officials ldentftythe Federal off Malls) oremplcyee(s) contacted arthe officer(s), employee(s), orMember(s) of Congress that were contacted 15. Check whether or not a SF-1 I I -A Continuation Shest(s) Is attached. 16. The certifying dffldal shall sign and date the forth, prim hisrher name, tide, and telephone numoer. Pueao rewo , exert for arts cwoc d of knarmraean -s sommea a swage 3a mmxee aer rMomtae. mdumm ame for rrao" msm, on*. soarowv evsanq =a saress. gonorng and mart nq no ma neeaaa, a mmewrp aM resrewt9 Cie awsa on of inrammW. Send txmmems rogaf m me ouraen esemaro Or cry Ww aseea at ens =WKMW of uaarmsoan, vteuautq suggwoa ar too rrq sea owe . a no Once at Mamgemomt mw Guam Pawn ee Reauaon Prgoa Idaee•ao+em, wrsusngan. o.e. amsaa. 528 • DOCUMENT NO. C2000392 ATTACHMENT NO. 02 PERFORMING AGENCY: CALHOUN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RECEIVING AGENCY PROGRAM: BUREAU OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH TERM: September 1, 1991 THROUGH August 31, 1992 SECTION I. SCOPE OF WORK: PERFORMING AGENCY will use direct assistance and/or financial assistance from RECEIVING AGENCY to provide health services to women and children. Emphasis will be placed on prenatal care, family planning services, especially during the first year post partum, and preventive child health services. Special emphasis should be given to low income women and children. In addition, the PERFORMING AGENCY will provide case management services to these women and children with an emphasis on services to high risk women and infants. Case management services include an assessment of the individual's and family's services needs and the development, implementation and evaluation of a plan to meet these needs. Services will be performed in accordance with the standards for maternity, family planning, and child health services as promulgated by the RECEIVING AGENCY, Bureau of Maternal and Child Health. Maternity/Family Planning and Child Health Clinic reports will be submitted to RECEIVING AGENCY, Bureau of Maternal and Child Health, in a format and time frame to be agreed • upon by both parties. PERFORMING AGENCY will participate in the development of networks under the leadership of its Public Health Regional Director. The Public Health Region ("Region") will be inviting a broad -based participation in its meetings to include community -based providers, county judges, city commissioners, community health center personnel, migrant health center personnel, medical schools, and agricultural extension agents. PERFORMING AGENCY will participate in a least 50% of the meetings called by the Region. PERFORMING AGENCY will work with the Region in order to coordinate services, avoid duplication, and develop "One Stop Shopping Care Centers" where possible. PERFORMING AGENCY will provide an estimated clients with services/units of service in or benefiting the county(ies)/area defined as: CALHOUN. SECTION II. LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT: Chapters 12 and 121, Health and Safety Code. SECTION [II. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: General Provisions, Program Income Article, requires that a fee for services system and a schedule of fees be developed. Low income mothers and children • provided health services under this attachment will not be charged a fee. The -1- 529 term "low income" refers to an individual or family with an income determined to be below the nonfarm income official poverty line defined by the Office of Management and Budget and revised annually in accordance with Section 624 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964. General Provisions , Reports and Inspections Article, is modified to include the following: PERFORMING AGENCY will provide unduplicated reports based on: (1) patients seen in maternity, child health and family planning clinics, including duration and scope of services, and (2) case management for each of the items listed in (1), noting referrals made and identifying each instance when PERFORMING AGENCY acts as the community -based comprehensive case manager. SECTION IV. BUDGET: Personnel $13,506.00 Fringe Benefits 3,582.00 Travel .00 Equipment .00 Supplies 9,562.00 Contractual 3,900.00 Other 813.00 Total Direct Costs $31,363.00 Indirect .00 TOTAL $31,363.00 Financial status reports (FSRs) are due the 20th of December, March, June, September and the 15th of October. Total reimbursements will not exceed $31,363.00. -2- • C 530 APPROVAL OF MINUTES is • A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the�tfinutes of the May 21, May 31 and June 5, 1991 be approved. i am4,. C my Ju ge He enrJ.Sm h,Comoner,, Pct.3 ;nmisshoner^Pct.2 Oscar F. Hahn, Commissioner,Pct.4 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ELECTION -CANVASS OF RETURNS The court canvassed the returns of the Constitutional Amendment Election held August 10, 1991 and ordered same recorded in the Election Records in the County Clerk's office. The Court recessed for lunch at the Golden Corral. BUDGET AMENDMENTS- S1IERIFF'S DEPT., CARE OF INDIGENTS -JUVENILE DETENTION SERVICES AND AMBULANCE DEPT.- PORT O'CONNOR Motion by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following Budget Amendments be approved. DUD6ET ANENUNENT REDUEET To, Calhoun County Commissioners' Court prom, Date: Calhoun County Sheriff's Department (Department making this request) August 1, 1991 I request an amendment to the _ 1991_ - budget for the (year) following it.. it... In my department, Amendment Gt`geeount N Account Nsme Amount Reauan 01-45-40-4920 Group Insurance - 51000.00 01-45-40-6210 Telephone Services + 51000.00 Budget account overdrarm Not chango In total budget for this department Is, PPG10d[� f _p_ --------save.. Other remarks/Justification, ,This department has spent an average or $967.00 per month, for a , total ob.�j 6, 769.00, for monthly telephone service. Tli Le does not include maintenancelease or Kepeir charges. Therefore, to maintain the present phone services, a budget amendment of j $5,000.00 to extend phone services to December 31, 1991, is required. —I 1 undorstand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until C ommissloners' Court approval Is obtained. Signature of o((Iclal/department head, ))/� �i� O, Date of L'ommissloners' Court approval, Date posted to General Ledger accuuntlsl, 1� 9 531 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County /Commissioners' Court From: � ( �t�:{'. ,i.CM( �CCJ�, • (Department making this r quest) Date: g , I a q I request an amendment to the I� II budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount Reason oi- n %, GPM—<I�,�o°� • Net change in total budget __�� p Ut9l for this department is: $other remarks/justification: AUGI! I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Pq Signature of official/department head: L) ibOQC 8yt_ 444417� IJ�LtrQ ,� Date of Commissioners' Court approval: �ootY4 Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 8-15-91 (m-r) _. 532 • BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court (n From: I I�y�CJYtCr r ln(J 1 �9�1 I O (Department making this request) Date: 0 - I a-9 I request an amendment to the Nq I budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account-#- 01-5!)ON-lay-1I • Amendment ---Account-Name -- ---Amount-_, 1------------^ - (I(A tMA,�I.mlCa� 1�0 I`f�`'�� i v� 00 Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: $____ 11 k Reason- AUG 12 1991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. IV signature of official/department head: Ou,fa �\ • Date of Commissioners' Court approval: VVJ Date posted to General Ledger account (s) 533 TAX ASSESSOR -COLLECTOR- MONTHLY AND ANNUAL REPORTS The County Tax Assessor -Collector presented her monthly report for June, 1991 and her annual report and after reading and verifying same a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said reports be approved. COUNTY TREASURER -MONTHLY REPORT The County Treasurer presented her monthly report and after reading and verifying same, a Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said report be approved. THE COURT RECESSED. REGULAR AUGUST TERM HELD AUGUST 13-, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN X • BE IT REMEMBERED that on this the 13th day of August, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:.00 A.M. a regular term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk (ABSENT) Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Opal M. Hayes' County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Deputy County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. BUDGET AMENDMENTS- COMMISSIONER PCT. # 3 - EMS.,INDIGENT HEALTHCARE Motion by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and • carried that the following Budget Amendments be approved. 534 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • From: pfu E J (Department making this request) 40 Date: I request an amendment to the NIGH budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount ------------- --- --------------- ------------- 49-�50 . ���0 ��—�- � -�. boo 500 -5*/ Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Reason ------------------- I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head:—ry�/f,✓ Date of Commissioners' Court approval. • Date posted to General Ledger acc t s): I i�'_. 5���i 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST a To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: / rn Q (Depart ent makinq this request) Date: I request an amendment to the III) budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account-- ---Account-Name --- ---Amount ------------------ Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: -------Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 5`� BUDGETS -ORDER SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON 1992 COUNTY BUDGETS AND FOR AMENDING ALL 1991 COUNTY BUDGETS AND SETTING TAX RATES AND LEVYING AND ASSESSING TAXES A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Court approve the Order Setting Date, time and place for public hearings on 1992 Budgets, for amending all 1991 County Budgets and for setting tax rates and levying and assessing taxes. Order follows: ORDER SETTING DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON 1992 COUNTY BUDGETS, FOR AMENDING ALL 1991 COUNTY BUDGETS AND FOR SETTING TAX RATES AND LEVYING AND ASSESSING TAXES WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas met on August 12, 1991 (Regular Term of the Commissioners Court), and WHEREAS, one of the items on the agenda was to set date, time and place for a public hearing on the 1992 County budgets, for amending all 1991 County budgets, and also for setting tax rates and levying and assessing taxes. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS, that a public hearing will be held on Monday, September 9th, 1991, at 10:00 A. M. in the Commissioners Courtroom in the Courthouse in Port Lavaca, Texas, on the 1992 County budgets and for amending all. 1991 County budgets. IT IS ALSO ORDERED BY THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS, that a public hearing will be held on Monday, September 16, 1991 at 10:00 A. M. in the Commis- sioners Courtroom in the Courthouse in Port Lavaca, Texas, on the matter of setting tax rates and levying and assessing taxes. COMMISSIONERS �LOURT OF q0tHOUNTY, TEXAS M 59 By • By AT,rTEu�Pau MarlCounnty._Clerk 537 Y. BIDS & PROPOSALS - INSURANCE POLICIES A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahii. and carried that the low bid of Hilb, Rogal, and Hamilton Co., of Victoria be accepted. INBURANCE PROPOSALB For the following types of coverage: AMBULANCE DRIVERS/ATTENDANTS MALPRACTICE (Policy # AML 293668) COUNTY CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS (Policy # BW 21253) DISTRICT CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS (Policy # BW 21254) 8 COVERAGE INCEPTION DATE 08-25-91 08-27-91 08-27-91 • COVERAGE IS TO BE THE SAME AS UNDER EXISTING POLICIES WHICH MAY BE REVIEWED IN • THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, CALHOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. (Policies must remain in the County Auditor's Office.) INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BIDDER. PROPOSAL AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUSIVE OF STATE TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER COSTS OF THE INSURANCE POLICY.. (Rates quoted will be guaranteed for 12 months. Second and third years will be re -negotiated with same carrier.) PROPOSAL ANNUAL PREMIUM 3-YEAR PREMIUM 1) AMBULANCE DRIVER/ATTENDANTS MALPRACTICE $ $5884.118 $ 2) COUNTY CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS $ $1993.95 $ 3) DISTRICT CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS $ $1812.63 $ NAME: HILB, ROGAL, AND HAMILTON CO. OF VICTORIA ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3710 CITY, STATE, ZIP: VICTORIA, TEXAS 77903 VE NUMBER: 1-512-1575-8256 4 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: A�z /-- TITLE: John B. Hud on- President • ,1 IINBURTNCE.PROPOSTLB • For the following types of coverage: AMBULANCE DRIVERS/ATTENDANTS MALPRACTICE (Policy # AML 293668) COUNTY CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS (Policy I BW 21253) DISTRICT CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS (Policy f BW 21254) COVERAGE INCEPTION DATE 08-25-91 08-27-91 08-27-91 COVERAGE IS TO BE THE SAME AS UNDER EXISTING POLICIES WHICH MAY BE REVIEWED IN THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, CALHOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. (Policies must remain in the County Auditor's Office.) ALL INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BIDDER. PROPOSAL AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUSIVE OF STATE TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER COSTS OF THE INSURANCE POLICY. (Rates quoted will be guaranteed for 12 months. Second and third years will be re -negotiated with same carrier.) IsPROPOSAL ANNUAL PREMIUM 3-YEAR PREMIUM 1) AMBULANCE DRIVER/ATTENDANTS MALPRACTICE $ 240,? JQ $ 2) COUNTY CLERK'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS $ $ 3) DISTRICT CLERK'S /ERRORS & OMISSIONS $ $ NAME: &Th/in ✓ (�j9�/V4-Z Co ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:_�2��/j�s F PHONE NUMBER: /- 9 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: a2,74 • 5fln ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Claims totaling $189,882.41 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL if Claims totaling $1,743.81 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula,. seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT-COMMISIONER PCT. 4 & CITY OF SEADRIFT A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner and carried that the intergovernmental contract between Commissioner Hahn, Pct. 4 and the City of Seadrift be tabled until a later date. THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL AUGUST TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I HELD AUGUST 23, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 23rd day of August, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M. a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J, Smith (ABSENT) Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members attending were Elvira Martinez, Betsy Wilson, Earnest Kabela, and Juaniece Madden, and Rayburn Haynie. Also present was District Attorney Jack Whitlow and David Martinez. Plans 8 & 9 were introduced. It was decided the committee would meet again September 3rd at 10:00 and the Public Hearing would be September 6, 1991. THE COURT ADJOURNED. • 0 • 540 • • SPECIAL AUGUST TERM HELD AUGUST 26, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS [ COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 26th day of August, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 9:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. TAX RATE- SETTING A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Court set the Public Hearing for the Proposed tax rate of $.35 on September 9, 1991 and to set the date for the Court vote on levying the tax rate for September 16, 1991. NOTICE OF TAX INCREASE Motion by Commissioenr Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith to authorize the publication of "Notice of Hearing on Tax Increase". THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL AUGUST TERM HELD AUGUST 30, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 30th day of August, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port • Lavaca, said County and State at 10:00 A.M. , A Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul Helen J. Smith County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk Commissioner Pct.3 was Absent whereupon the following proceedings were had: �fij Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. - rULL BIDS FOR Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the Court award the bid bidder. to Mauritz Company, the low Is FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ / X 2800 = $ b, Dt� PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ . 7 yGo�j X 3000 = $ ,37D?1D DIESEL FUEL $ p D X 2500 = $ I J� '2 pD TOTAL BID PRICE $ THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASIO DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE y® �A y-T-- 1-3 .9 0� C„9-. tic 7 7 Y 7 9 • 11 FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ , 4i / J X 2800 = $ 1957 .20 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $_�%G� X 3000 = $ ;23011,60 DIESEL FUEL $ .. (e % X 2500 = $ Ile %SL)O TOTAL BID PRICE $ S`I3�•a0 THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. • NAME OF BIDDER: �NF //L/!C!Rl I Z `y• ADDRESS ///''�: CITY, STATE, ZIP C�lumoo Trm s %796.Z PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE ��,� DATE • 543 • FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ .728 X 2800 = $ 2038.40 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $775 X 3000 - $ 2325.00 DIESEL FUEL $ .681 X 2500 = $ 1702.50 TOTAL BID PRICE $ 6065.90 THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: DIE➢EI, OIL CO., INC. ADDRESS P. 0. Box 71 CITY, STATE, ZIP Port Lavaca, TX 77979 PHONE NUMBER 552-3224 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE President DATE August 30, 1991 r� 544 • is BIDS & PROPOSALS- PRECINCT NO. ONE- PICK-UP The following bids were received. Action was tabled until the meeting of September 9, 1991 SPECIFICATIONS E PROPOSAL FOR ONE NEW 1992 PICKUP TRUCK CALHOUN COUNTY PRECINCT 1 1) NEW 1992 MODEL . 2) 1/2 TON STANDARD CAB PICKUP ,/3) 8 FT. BOX - LONG BED ,4) AT LEAST 5450 G.V.W. 99W -5) AT LEAST 5.0 LITER VS ENGINE lq „6) AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. ✓/) 5 - P215/75R/15 TIRES ✓ 8) HEAVY DUTY ALTERNATOR - 60 AMP AT LEAST 732P 63 /9) HEAVY DUTY BATTERY 76e 10) HEAVY DUTY REAR BUMPER ey5L11) HEAVY DUTY RADIATOR tj/12) HEAVY DUTY FRONT SPRINGS 6p,13) HEAVY DUTY REAR SPRINGS ✓14) HEAVY DUTY SHOCKS 15) FRONT BRAKES THAT DO NOT PICK UP ROAD GRAVEL � 6) AM RADIO ✓1/) POWER STEERING v_' ) ; POWER BRAKES 6) HEAVY DUTY VINYL SEAT y97"17) FACTORY AIR CONDITIONING AND HEATING UNIT ' TOTAL BID PRICE (NO TRADE-IN): $ �3,�j 00 DELIVERY DATE: / yieF CROSSTOWN FORD SALES, INC. 4721AYERS CORPUS CHRISTI. TY 78415-140, 545 BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: AND THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLE(S) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE WITHIN 180 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: ADDRESS: 4721AYERS TI. TX ; 8415-1405 CITY, STATE, ZIP: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: 0 / TITLE: r� iY/t3n/JQ�o % n U • 546 i • SPECIFICATIONS 6 PROPOSAL FOR ONE NEW 1992 PICKUP TRUCK CALHOUN COUNTY PRECINCT 1 1) NEW 1992 MODEL 2) 1/2 TON STANDARD CAB PICKUP 3) 8 FT. BOX - LONG BED 4) AT LEAST 5450 G.V.W. 5) AT LEAST 5.0 LITER V8 ENGINE 6) AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 7) 5 - P215/75R/15 TIRES 8) HEAVY DUTY ALTERNATOR - 60 AMP AT LEAST 9) HEAVY DUTY BATTERY 10) HEAVY DUTY REAR BUMPER 11) HEAVY DUTY RADIATOR 12) HEAVY DUTY FRONT SPRINGS 13) HEAVY DUTY REAR SPRINGS 14) HEAVY DUTY SHOCKS 15) FRONT BRAKES THAT DO NOT PICK UP ROAD GRAVEL 16) AM RADIO 17) POWER STEERING 15) POWER BRAKES 16) HEAVY DUTY VINYL SEAT 17) FACTORY AIR CONDITIONING AND HEATING UNIT TOTAL BID PRICE (NO TRADE-IN): $ I� �ZS 34 DELIVERY DATE: _ 140 - 'To N j WC- kC(kJ9 �keT Au, Sjq?Cs, 547 BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLE(S). HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE WITHIN 180 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: ADDRESS: (J" CITY, STATE, ZIP: TITLE: /12 netifc- O�r AL/ c F& • • 548 M A I N 908 WEST MAIN PORT LAVACA, TEYAS 77979 August 29, 1991 • B. H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County,Texas 211 S. Ann/County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Mr. Comiskey, We are pleased to submit the following bid for Precinct One for your consideration. One New 1992 Dodge D150 Regular Cab 4x2 Pickup equipped as follows: LWB Base, 8' Box 6200 G.V.W. (H.D.Suspension) 5.2L Engine 4 Speed Automatic (5) P235/75RBSW A/S Tires H. D. Alternator H. D. Battery H. D. Rear Bumper (Dealer Installed) Maximum Engine Cooling (H.D. Radiator) Shock Absorbers Long Life Gas Filled Front Stabilizer Bar Pacer Brakes w/rear wheel anti lock • am/fm Radio Power Steering H.D. Vinyl Seats Factory Air and Heat Bid Price $ 13,604.22 Tax 00.00 Title Trsf 00.00 Licesne 00.00 State Inspection 15.75 Documentary Fee 25.00 TOTAL PRICE $ 13,644.97 We appreciate the opportunity to bid on this unit and are looking forward to being of service to you. oc:JC • Sincerely yours, James Yyelrl� 549 M A I N 908 WEST MAIN PORT LAVACA, TEXAS 77979 August 29, 1991 B. H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann/County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Mr. Comiskey, We are pleased to submit the following bid for Precinct One for your consideration. One New 1992 Ford F150 Styleside Reqular Cab 4x2 Pickup equipped as follows: LWB Base, 8 Foot Box 5450 G.V.W 5.O1, EFI V8 Engine Automatic O/D (5) P215/75RX15SL Tires H.D. Alternator H.D. Battery H.D. Rear Bumper (Dealer installed) Super Eng. Cooling (H.D. Radiator) Handling Package: H.O. Front Springs Front/Rear Stabilizer Bars H.D. Front/Rear Shock Absorbers H.D. Rear Suspension Pkg. Pacer Brakes w/rear wheel anti lock am Radio Power Steering H. D. Vinyl Bench Seat Factory Air and Heat Bid Price $ 13,823.20 Tax 00.00 Title Trsf. 00.00 License 00.00 State Inspection 15.75 Doctivmentary Fee 25.00 TOTAL PRICE $ 13,863.95 We appreciate the opportunity to bid on this unit and are looking forward to being of service to you. oc:JC r L Sincerelyyou}rs, • James Me er 550 B. H. COMISKEY, JR. C.P.A. COUNTY AUDITOR CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS 211 S. ANN - COUNTY COURTHOUSE PORT LAVACA, TEXAS 77979 (512)-553-4610 • August 15, 1991 KNAPP CHEVROLET P O BOX 4179 HOUSTON, TEXAS, 77210 You are invited to submit a bid on the following item(s): ONE NEW 1992 PICKUP TRUCK FOR PRECINCT ONE You are requested to submit your bid addressed to: B. 11. COMISKEY, JR. C.P.A. COUNTY AUDITOR CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS 211 S. ANN - COUNTY COURTHOUSE PORT LAVACA, TEXAS 77979 Bids should be submitted in a sealed envelope plainly marked: "SEALED BID" - 1992 PICKUP TRUCK Specifications may be obtained from the County Auditor's Office at the address indicated above. • Bids will be received in the office of the County Auditor time they until 10:00 am, FRIDAY, August 30, 1991 at which will be publicly opened and read aloud in the regular meeting room of the Commissioners' Court. Bids received after the designated time will be returned unopened. The Commissioners' Court reserves the right to waive technicalities, reject any or all bids, to accept the bid deemed most advantageous to Calhoun County and to be the sole judge in determining which bids. will be most advantageous to the County. The County of Calhoun, Texas is an equal employment opportunity employer. The County does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age and handicapped status in employment or the provision of services. BY ORDER OF COMMISSIONERS' COURT H ARD G' /yARTZOG,p COUNTY JUDG161,14 BEN H. COMISKEY, JAI, OUNTY AUDITOR • 551 SPECIFICATIONS 8 PROPOSAL FOR ONE NEW 1992 PICKUP TRUCK CALHOUN COUNTY PRECINCT 1 • 1) NEW 1992 MODEL 2) 1/2 TON STANDARD CAB PICKUP - 3) 8 FT. BOX - LONG BED 4) AT LEAST 5450 G.V.W. 5) AT LEAST 5.0 LITER V8 ENGINE 6) AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 7) 5 - P215/75R/15 TIRES 8) HEAVY DUTY ALTERNATOR - 60 AMP AT LEAST - 9) HEAVY DUTY BATTERY 10) HEAVY DUTY REAR BUMPER 11) HEAVY DUTY RADIATOR 12) HEAVY DUTY FRONT SPRINGS 13) HEAVY DUTY REAR SPRINGS • 14) HEAVY DUTY SHOCKS 15) FRONT BRAKES THAT DO NOT PICK UP ROAD GRAVEL 16) AM RADIO 17) POWER STEERING 15) POWER BRAKES 16) HEAVY DUTY VINYL SEAT 17) FACTORY AIR CONDITIONING AND HEATING UNIT TOTAL BID PRICE (NO TRADE-IN): DELIVERY DATE: CJ 52 BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: • 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLE(S) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY, OR. ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE WITHIN 180 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: ADDRESS: �n, xr'zx 7/7 � CITY, STATE, ZIP: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: • 76n/1'r�('.� �CePSa�/ �c nl l9r✓Zo • 553 CALHOUN COUNTY YOUTH CO-ORDINATOR Denise Green, County Youth Co-ordinator appeared before the Court and asked the Commissioners' Court to judge a Poster Contest during National 4-H week - Oct. 6 - 12th. LOCAL AGREEMENT-C.C.I.S.D.& CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT AND THE is OFFICE OF CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CALHOUN COUNTY A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the court ratify the agreement between Calhoun County Independent School District and Calhoun County Sheriff's Dept. and the Criminal District Attorney's Office. LOCAL AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS { { COUNTY OF CALHOUN { This LOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Calhoun County Independent School District, by and through Toni Turk, Trustee under this agreement, located in Calhoun County, Texas, and hereinafter called • "C.C.I.S.D.", and the CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and the office of the CALHOUN COUNTY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and the office of the Calhoun County Criminal District Attorney desire to enter into an agreement with C.C.I.S.D. regarding disbursement of funds to Calhoun High Against Illegal Narcotics, hereinafter referred to as C.H.A.I.N. WHEREAS, the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and the office of the Calhoun County Criminal District Attorney agree to provide funds in the amount hereinafter stated for drug abuse prevention programs on the • C.C.I.S.D. campuses. WHEREAS, C.C.I.S.D., through Toni Turk, as Trustee, agrees to disburse funds, granted to C.H.A.I.N. by the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and the office of the Page 1 of 2 554 • • • Calhoun County Criminal District Attorney, to provide the C.H.A.I.N. organization funds for its drug abuse prevention programs. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS LOCAL AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered into by C.C.I.S.D., the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department, and the office of the Calhoun County Criminal District Attorney for the mutual consideration stated herein. These funds may be used only for proper public purposes in compliance with the restrictions of Article 3, Section 51 of the Texas Constitution. This agreement shall apply to money granted C.H.A.I.N. by the office of the Calhoun County Criminal District Attorney in the amount of $500.00, and by the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department in the amount of $500.00, on the 8th day of August, A.D., 1991. SIGNED this the _� day of August, A.D., 1991. 1�- KEN BOWDEN, Sheriff Toni Turk, Trustee, C.C.I.S.D. i l A`0AN D. WHITLOW, 60�6iminal District Attorney Page 2 of 2 555 LIBRARY MEETING ROOM - RULES AND REGULATIONS A Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court ratify the Rules & Regulations • pertaining to use of Library meeting room facilities. RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO USE OF LIBRARY MEETING ROOM FACILITIES 1. The Calhoun County Library, Library Board and Commissioners' Court shall have exclusive right to the use of the library meeting room (facilities). 2. When properly scheduled, secondary use may be alloted for meetings of Friends of the Library, pursuant to these rules and regulations. To encourage philan- thropic contributions to the library, any person who has provided a meaningful and substantial financial contri- bution to construction and development of the library, shall be designated Admirals, Commodores and Captains, and be granted use of said facilities consistent with these rules and regulations. ' • 3. Public use may likewise be granted for special affairs sponsored by the Chambers of Commerce, charitable organizations, and responsible civic clubs, when approved by the Librarian. In the absence of the Librarian,. approval may be granted by the Chairperson of the Library Board and in their absence, approval may be granted by the County Judge. 4. Users of the facilities exempt from any deposit fee are those in paragraphs 1 and 2 above. All other users shall pay a fee of $25.00 per day. 5. No county grounds or facilities shall be used for any unlawful purpose, or for any commercial profit -making enterprise. No group or activity shall cause a distur- bance of the peace, or result in damage to the building, furniture, floors or the adjacent grounds. The Librarian, Chairperson of the Library Board or the County Judge shall have exclusive right to deny access to those persons or groups who would tend to create a disturbance. However, there shall be no discrimination against any legal minority, whether race, religion, national origin or otherwise. 6. No alcoholic or malt beverages shall be permitted on the premises. 7. Any sponsoring organization using the facilities • shall execute a release and indemnify the County from any damage to property or injury to any person arising out of the use of the facilities. 556 • 8. Failure by the responsible party to pay for all damages occasioned by them in their use of the facilities may bar them from all future use of the facilities. 9. Any organization, company or individual who will- fully destroys or defaces the property in any way will be barred from use of the facilities by order of the Calhoun County Commissioners' Court. 10. Each sponsoring organization must provide its own supplies (refreshments, utensils, cups, projectors, P. A. system, etc.). The meeting room has 50 chairs, 4 tables, a lectern, TV and VCR. The room capacity is 50 people. 11. For public use of any facility pursuant to para- graph No. 3 above, application for use must be made by an adult person in written form, 10 days prior to required use, with the Librarian's office, 10:00 A. M. to 6:00 P. M. Tuesday through Friday; forms (marked Exhibit A) will be provided by the Librarian. Arrangements for emergency meetings may be made by calling the Librarian at 512-552-7250 at same hours as shown above. Such person, at the time of making the reservations, shall be responsible in assuring that these rules and regulations are complied with by those persons using the facilities. Facilities will not be used for more than 4 hours per day, unless specifically requested and approved by the Librarian. Opening times and lockup times should include • allowances for setup and cleanup. 12. Any changes from the normal seating setup will be the responsibility of the organization. The user shall be responsible for arranging tables and chairs. 13. The County shall provide the necessary forms for application for use of the facilities and all appli- cations shall be made to the Librarian. 14. The Librarian shall schedule all meetings, giving preference to applications as provided by these rules and regulations. The Librarian shall post the schedule of meetings in a conspicuous and public area outside her office. All meetings shall be limited to four (4) hours and facilities shall be closed no later than 10:00 P. M. Any variance to these rules shall be subject to Library Board approval. 15. The Librarian shall receive all deposits which she shall deliver to the County Treasurer on or before the 5th day of each month. • 557 16. The Librarian shall be responsible for the keys to the building for other than official use. 17. The Librarian shall file an annual report no later than July let indicating names of organizations which used the building and the amount of rent collected. 18. A copy of the rules and regulations shall be provided to each user along with an application form. The user shall read the rules and regulations and shall comply with these rules and regulations. 19. Any organization, company or individual who fails to abide by any of the rules and regulations shall forfeit the right of future use of any of the facilities and shall be subject to liability as described by these rul,,el and regulations or as otherwise provifiWd by law, Hoord-X, ;W g y Ju ge AT EST: Ma � ene Paul, uoun y Cierk • • 558 n U ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE ADDRESS DATE REQUESTED OPEN "ERUIBIT A" APPLICATION FOR BUILDING USE Calhoun County Library Meeting Room Facilities (Public Use) DATE PHONE a.m. or p.m. (Include setup b cleanup time) CLOSE a.m. or p.m. TYPE OF ACTIVITY (EDUCATIONAL MEETING, BANQUET, ETC.)_ Unless other arrangements are made with the Building Superintendent, you are responslble • for setting up, cleanup, etc. The fee wll be $25.00 per day. AMOUNT PAID I have received a copy of the rules S regulations concerning these facilities, and agree to abide by them. I also agree to release and indemnify the County from any damage to property, or Injury to any person arising out of the use of the facilities. Signature • 559 PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL, INC. -OFFICE SPACE -ANNEX A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the Court approve the use of the Courthouse Annex office space for the Private Industry Council to use for training until December 31st at no cost until such time they can provide the Court with a report as to the services they are providing for residents of Calhoun County. DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 10 COMMISSIONERS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that the ordered passed August 12, 1991 appointing Commissioners for Drainage District No. 10 be rescinded as they appointments are not to be made until 1992. DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 3 - COMMISSIONER The court took no action on an appointment to fill the vacancy of Olan Pendergrass. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Claims totaling $283,111.16 were and after reading and verifying Commissioner Mikula, seconded by that said claims be approved for ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL presented by the County Auditor same, a motion was made by Commissioner Belk and carried, payment. Claims totaling $449,101.22 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissionr Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT- ADVERTISE FOR BIDS A Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried, that the County Auditor, with the aid of the Commissioners, advertise for bids on hospital equipment items as per John Hayes list and to authorize Commissioner Hahn and Commissioner Belk to work on the bids documents in order to minimize the warehouse time by the county and to maximize interest potential of our money and to open bids September 30th and award bids October 14th. n LJ • E 560 r L J • • MAGNOLIA BEACH WASTEWATER SYSTEM, PHASE TWO -BID OPENING A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula, and carried that the bids be given to the Engineers, Testingeer,Inc. for tabulation and that the bids be awarded September 9th. W.N, ME -CEP, CHAIRMAN NIGHT PHONE 782-2296 S.A. MEPCEN. PRESIDENT HIDHT PHONE 762 5676 . H .RCER. JR.. NIGHT PHONE 762-6532 J.L. TRAYLOR, V.P. IT L, OTTLEY. SEC.-TRES, MERCER CONSTRUCTION CO. WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTORS 909 N. COLORADO P.O. DRAWER J EDNA, TEXAS 77957 August 30, 1991 Commissioners Court 211 S. Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas of Calhoun County 77979 Re: Bid for Magnolia Beach Phase Two Wastewater Collection System Improvements LETTER OF CLARIFICATION As concerning the attached referenced bid: All sewer mains to be installed with PVC Sewer Pipe, ASTM D3034, SDR35. This is a substitutioon for the less -expensive product specified for the B11 and loll mains 2. All pipe used on residential lots in all sizes installed will be billed at the unit price bid in bid item (M) 3. Bid item (L) was figured to include compensation to us for a maximum of two connections at each lot. No other conditions of the specifications are affected. MERCER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY W..H. Mercer Chairman TELEPHONES EDNA 1121782-7163 512/782-2112 HOUSTON METRO 713/342-4301 561 PROSPECTIVE PRIME CONTRACTOR'S (BIDDER) STATEMENT ABOUT EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE (fl(j I have participated in previous contract(s) or subcontract(s) subject to the equal opportunity clause under Executive Orders 11246 and 11375 or preceding Executive Orders 10925 and 11114. I have filed all reports due under the requirements contained in 40 CFR, Part C, 8.11. ( ) I have not participated in previous contract(s) subject to the equal opportunity clause under Executive Orders 11246 and 11375 or preceding Executive Orders 10925 and 11114. I will obtain a similar statement from any proposed subcontractors(s), when appropriate. In . d—mE2(E�L C14wor1w or typed Name and Title of Frospective rnme or 6lC(Edt- C0Ns-fjWC(11)14 C.orcrtN, Q (Do, N COL-02AOo L`ya/t�—Tc—xA5 -nq9 i (Mama Pnrl nrlrirp.RC of Prospective Prime or Sub Contractor) • r� J 640 • • • PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION NO. THIS BID IS SUBMITTED TO Calhoun County Magnolia Beach Phase Two Wastewater Collection System Improvements BID FORM Yalu City, State, Zip Wastewater Collection System Improvements Texas Department of Commerce Contract No. 700391 Calhoun County Commissioners' Court Port Lavaca, Texas 1. The undersigned BIDDER proposes and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to enter into an Agreement with OWNER in the form included in the Contract Documents to complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the Contract Price and within the Contract Time indicated in this Bid and in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2. BIDDER accepts all of the terms and conditions of the Instructions to Bidders, including without limitation those dealing with the disposition of Bid Security. This Bid will remain open for thirty-five (35) days after the day of Bid opening. Bidder will sign the Agreement and submit the Contract Security and other documents required by the Contract Documents within ten days after the date of OWNER's Notice of Award. 3. In submitting this Bid, BIDDER represents, as more fully set forth in the Agreement, that: (a) Bidder has examined copies of all the Contract Documents and of the following addenda, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and also copies of the Advertisement or Invitation to Bid and the Instructions to Bidders. Number Date 1 AUGUST 20 1991 2 AUGUST 23 1991 A-1 Number Date Qe c. r z3-�� v Iq-z7-�� 563 (b) BIDDFR has examined the site and locality where the Work is to be the legal requirements (federal, state and local laws, isperformed, ordinances, rules and regulations) and the conditions affecting cost, progress or performance of the Work and has made such independent investigations as BIDDER deems necessary. (c) This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, firm or corporation and is not submitted in conformity with any agreement or rules of any group, association, organization or corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a false or sham Bid; BIDDER has not solicited or induced any person, firm or a corporation to refrain from bidding; and BIDDER has not sought by collusion to obtain for himself any advantage over any other Bidder or over OWNER. 4. Bidder will complete the work for the following prices: Base Bid: (a) Construction of 2523 LF of new 10" PVC sewer line, including all fittings and connections, complete and in place at $__� yO per Linear foot #'or -a f' '2C) - � - f O_D. -- DOLLARS $ (b) Construction of 3378 LF of new 8" PVC sewer line, including all fittings and connections, complete and in place 1S at $ .5 per linear foot feg��7o DOLLARS $— (c) Construction of 3525_ LF of new 6" PVC sewer line, including all fittings and connections, complete and in place at $-�`'` — per linear foot fer_aP4@*ffi=uF. OQ 14 -DOLLARS (d) Construction of F2' LF of trenching, bedding and backfill 1 s than five feet in depth, complete and in place at $O - per linear foot €�f: 70 l . d qX11 a �DOLLARS $ 2 S 75� I. (e) Construction of 4173 LF of trenching, bedding and backfill, five feet and greater in depth, complete and in place at $ " per linear foot fer a te6al �f. o u 8LIe 0 �� DOLLARS $ ���z 3• — (f) Construction of 4173 LF of sMVring and trench protection, complete and in place $ /. ° per linear foot fn—a tam' 0 L9 j C.'L V S /" DOLLARS $ J S2�Z (g) Construction of 21 each new fiberglass manhole • assemblies, includin cast-iron rings and covers, complete and in place at $'7 /o if ° each for . -n 0A p o 4DOLLARS A-2 564 (h) inlete Construction of 13 each new six-inch diameter cleanout standard casting, includinqE',' a`lt_,-fittings and assemblies, concrete, complete and in place at $¢ eachh fer-a • �afa af. p p / buy bLLARS $po 1/cID� �- (i) r r Construction of 6 each new manhole insert assemblies, complete and in place at $S.GO each fey a fates-ef: pp1 � c0 d- 71//cd DOLLARS (j) Construction of -4LF of concrete encasement, complete °C linear foot baf: and in place at $ per c.o )n .' ., 4- o c DOLLARS $ O • ✓ (k) Construction of IQ77 _ SY of 6" compgcgted road base and in place at $ /2 .— per square repair, co p yard o O d DOLLARS $ V 0Q!Zi (1) Construction of 76 each new sanitary sewer service connections, including hook-up to private residences, complete nd in place at $ /40 "1 each-for_--W�LeEeekof: ee m �-cci�it V- �// o DOLLARS $ (m) Construction of 3955 LF of new 4" PVC sanitary sewer including trenching, backfilling, service extensions, cleanouts all fittings and connections, complete and in place/at $ t,3o per linear foot fes�-k f: SO • o'- 3 O Q DOLLARS $ 1� 7 (n) Construction of 690 LF of new 4" PVC sanitary sewer service stub -outs, including service clamps, complete and in place at $ per linear foot femme-­oke>_€: �- b O o DOLLARS $ (o) Traffic control barricades for public protection, complete and in place for a 1 ynp sum of: c, O 4d a, IE Ytcle, d DOLLARS $ End (p) Construction of miscellaneous items including cleanup for a compete for a lump sum of: o 0 `p/r fo�ect >l//9u — DOLLARS $ 3E7C10.'— Total amount of Base Bid; (sum of total amount bid for items (a) Ohrough (p): $ '/ 5� I410 2 A-3 565 Sales Tax Exem tR_ion: So that a certificate of exemption from the Texas Limited Sales Excise and Use Tax may be prepared by the OWNER, the • following amount is provided as the cost of materials and tangible personal property included in the to�al bid for Phase I. 67, co Its O T[6 e cCx.-.CP DOLLARS $ 5. BIDDER agrees that the Work will be substantially completed within (90) days after the date the Contract Time commences to run, and will be completed within 120 calendar days after the date the Contract Time commences to run. Bidder accepts the provisions of the Agreement as to liquidated damages in the event of failure to complete the Work on time. 6. The following documents are attached to and made a Condition of this Bid: (a) Required Bid Security in the form of a bid bond, cashier's check or certified check. (b) A tabulation of Subcontractors and organizations required to be identified in this Bid. (c) Statement Regarding Equal Opportunity Clause. 7. Communications concerning this Bid shall be delivered to the address of bidder indicated below. 8. The terms used in this Bid which are defined in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract included as part of the Contract Documents have the meanings assigned to them in the General Conditi ns. • SUBMITTED ON �� ti 19V A-4 • 566 I£ BIDDER is: • AnIndividu 1 By (SEAL) doing business as Business address: Telephone A Partnership By Business address: • A Corporation BY m (Corporate Seal) • (General Partner) of A-5 (SEAL) 567 Attest Business address: K (D �h 0 AL- Telephone No. �/7 Dint Venture M. • i (Each J6int venture must sign. The manner of signing for each individual, • partnership and corporation that is a party to the joint venture should be in the ma/rmer indicated above.) 000 - - SVf3CO1�lZCt-(�c1�R-S iC�6'OSF7�. A-6 C �am • C J • PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION NO.: THIS BID IS SUBMITTED TO: Calhoun County Magnolia Beach Phase Two Wastewater Co11I pction System rovements BID FORM Davis Plumbing Company Bidding Firm HCR 63 Box 44 F RnAd 236 Address Cuero, Texas 77954 City, State, Zip Wastewater Collection System Improvements Texas Department of Commerce Contract M. 700391 Calhoun County Commissioners' Court Port Lavaca, Texas 1. The undersigned BIDDER proposes and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to enter into an Agreement with OWNER in the form included in the Contract Documents to g Con-uments for the tract Price and within the Contractecified or dTimeindicain t d in this Bin and oe m accordance with the Contract Documents. 2_ BIDDER accepts all of the terms and conditions of the Instructions to Bidders, including without limitation those dealing with the disposition of Bid Security. This Bid will remain open for thirty-five (35) days after the day of Bid opening. Bidder will sign the Agreement and submit the Contract Security and other documents required by the Contract Documents within ten days after the date of OWNER's Notice of Award. 3. In submitting this Bid, BIDDER represents, as more fully set forth in the Agreement, that: (a) Bidder has examined copies of all the Contract Documents and of the following addenda, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and also copies of the Advertisement or Invitation to Bid and the Instructions to Bidders. Number Date 1 AUGUST 20 1991 2 AUGUST 23, 1991 A-1 Number Date 569 • (b) BIDDER has examined the site and locality where the Work is to be (federal, state and local laws, performed, the legal requirements and nand d thaffecting conditions ordinancs, rules ogf�the Work as made suchind pendent progresseor performance investigations as BIDDER deems necessary. (c) This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of any is not submitted in undisclosed person, firm or corporation and agreement or rules of any group, association, conformity with any organization or corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indirectly false or sham Bid; induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a or induced any person, firm or a corporation BIDDER has not solicited to refrain from bidding; and BIDDER has not sought by collusion to Bidder or over obtain for himself any advantage over any other OWNER. Bidder will complete the work for the following prices: 4. Base Bid: (a) Construction of 252$_ LF of new 10" PVC sewer line, and in place includi$g3011 fittinglinear foot for antotal ofcomplete at $ per Twernty-thausn,nd nine hundred DOLLARS $20 g40.90 oty- an inety (b) Construction of 3378 LF of new 8" PVC sewer line, including all fittings and connections, complete and in place at $ 6.10 per linear foot for a total of: • Twenty -thousand six hundred DOLLARS $20.605.80 five and eighty (c) Construction of 335225 LF of new 6" PVC sewer line, complete and in place including all fittings and connections, linear foot for a total of: at $ 5.40 per Nineteen thousand thirty- DOLLARS $19,035.00 five and no/100 (d) Construction of 5253 LF of trenching, bedding and feet i depth,complete and in place backfi11, less thave 8for at $ 6Per a total Forty-fiyg thou and one hundred DOLLARS $45,175.80 eighty seventy -rive ansd (a) Construction of 4173 LF of trenching, bedding and depth comof:te and in backfill, five f9ee40ando greater fin total place at $ P Thirty-nine thousand two hundred OLLARS $39 226.20 twenty-six an twenty (f) Construction of 4173 LF shoringofl0and trench pp footeforona complete and in place $ perlinear total of: & thrLLA tDO�S $ 4 173.00 • Four thousand one hundred seven (g) Construction of 21 each new fiberglass manhole covers, complete assemblies, including cast-iron rings and 1275.00_ each for a total price of: and in place at $ Twenty-six thousand seven hundred $26 775.00 seventy five and no/1B0 — A-2 570 (h) Constructio3 each wdiameter an out as emblis,n standard cast g, includingg all fittinlgsand e$180.00 each for a concrete, complete and in place at total of hh hundred DOLLARS $ 2,340.00 Yo°tyhanaano/lU�ee (i) Construction of 6 each new manhole insert assemblies, • complete and in place at $ 75.00 each for a total of Four hundred fifty- _DOLLARS $ 450.00 (j) Construction of 40 LF of concrete encasement, complete and in place at $ 12.50 per linear foot for a total of: Five hundred DOLLARS $ 500.00 (k) Construction of 167 SY of 6" compacted road base repair, complete and in place at $ 9.00 per square yard for a total of: One thousand five hundred DOLLARS $ 1,503.00 three (I) Construction of � each new sanitary sewer service including hook-up to private residences, connections, complete and in place at $ 390.00 each for a total of: Twenty-nine thousand six hundredDOLLARS $29.640.00 forty (m) Construction of 3955 LF of new 4" PVC sanitary sewer service extensions, including trenching, backfilling, cleanouts all fittings and connections, or a tcomplete and in 5 . place at $ per linear foot otal of: TTw my -one tho S nd seven hundredOLLARS $21,752.50 fi tv-two andity • (n) Construction of £9Q_ LF of new 4" PVC sanitary sewer service stub -outs, oo including edi linear foot forma total complete and in place at $ P Nine thousand six hundred DOLLARS $ 9 660.00 gUxty (o) Traffic control barricades for public protection, complete and in place for a lump sum of: Two thousand DOLLARS $ 2,000.00 (p) Construction of miscellaneous items including cleanup for a complete project for a lump sum of: Two thousand DOLLARS $ 2,009.00 Total amount of Base Bid; (sum of total amount bid for items (a) through (p): Two hundred forty five thousand seven httndxR uenr*z'- Seven and twenty _DOLLARS $ 245 7 77. 20 A-3 • 571 Sales Tax Exemution: So that a certificate of exemption from the Texas • Limited Sales Excise and Use Tax may be prepared by the OWNER, the following amount is provided as the cost of materials and tangible personal prop ty inc/l`}ded in the total bid for Phase I. �7uAl��JOUSANci DOLLARS $�OO Q 5. BIDDER agrees that the Work will be substantially completed within (90) days after the date the Contract Time commences to run, and will be completed within 120 calendar days after the date the Contract Time commences to run. Bidder accepts the provisions of the Agreement as to liquidated damages in the event of failure to complete the Work on time. 6. The following documents are attached to and made a Condition of this Bid: (a) Required Bid Security in the form of a bid bond, cashier's check or certified check. (b) A tabulation of Subcontractors and organizations required to be identified in this Bid. (c) Statement Regarding Equal Opportunity Clause, 7. Communications concerning this Bid shall be delivered to the address of bidder indicated below. 8. The terms used in this Bid which are defined in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract included as part of the Contract Documents have the meanings • assigned to them in the General Conditions. SUBMITTED ON August 30 , 19 91 A-4 C 572 If BIDDER is: An InAnd" • By doing business as Business address: No. A Corporatign By Davis Plumbin Com an (Corporation Name) President ('title) (Corporate Seal) • A-5 (SEAL) 573 ..hest Linda Sigmund (Secretary) Business address: HCR 63 Box 44 • Cuero Texas 77954 Telephone No. 512 275-5721 L-M (Each joint venture must sign. The manner of signing for each indi�al, partnership and corporation that is a party to the joint venture should be in the manner indicated above.) • A-6 • 574 • • • PROSPECTIVE PRIME CONTRACTOR'S (BIDDER) CERTIFICATION OF NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES I hereby certify that I do not and will not maintain any facilities provided for my employees in a segregated manner, or permit any employees to perform their services at any location under my control where segregated facilities are maintained; and that I will obtain a similar certification prior to the award of any subcontract exceeding $10,000 whicl; is not exempt from the equal opportunity clause. Title of Prospective Prime Contract Robert C. Davis, President Printed or Type Name and Title of Prospective Prime Representative Davis Plumbing Company HCR 63 Box 44 Cuero Texas 77954 Name and Address of Prospective Prime Contractor ve 5'70 PROSPECTIVE PRIME CONTRACTOR'S BIDDER) STATEMENT EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLBAUSE ( ) I have participated in previous contract(s) or subcontract(s) subject to the equal opportunity clause under Executive Orders 11246 and 11375 or preceding Executive Orders 10925 and 11114. I have filed all reports due under the requirements contained in 40 CFR, Part C, 5.11. ( ) I have not participated in previous contract(s) subject to the equal opportunity clause under Executive Orders 11246 and 11375 or preceding Executive Orders 10925 and 11114. I will obtain a similar statement from any proposed subcontractors(s), when or ve) Davis Plumbing Company HCR 63 Box ve rnme or Cuero Texas 77954 (Name and address of Prospective Prime or Sub Contractor) • • • 576 • • • ADDENDUM NO.2 TO PROJECT MANUAL FOR CALHOUN COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Prepared by: TESTENGEER, INC. August 23, 1991 The following revisions to the Project Manual for the Wastewater Collection System Improvements, Magnolia Beach Phase Two, shall be made. Insofar as the original Project Manual, Drawings and Addendum No 1 are inconsistent with this Addendum No.2, this Addendum shall govern. BID F RM The attached Bid Form has been revised to include numerical corrections and clarifications. Previous Bid Forms should be discarded and this revised Bid Form should be submitted at the Bid Opening. DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK Section 02607 - Manholes and Covers - Page 02607-1 1,5 PAYMENT: Delete the word "inserts" and replace with the word "frames'. Add the sentence: 'Payment for inserts will be at the contract unit price for inserts installed complete and in place." 21 MANHOLES: c. Phvsical Properties, shall read as follows: Nominal manhole I.D. shall be 48 inches, length shall be as indicated on the drawings and shall be of one piece construction including 48 inch reducing cone and 22- 1/2 inch manway. Manholes shall not be required to have steps. 577 • Section 02732 - Sanitary Sewer Collection System - Page 02732-1 1.5 MEASUREMENT: Add the following: e. Bid Item No. (1) is based on an estimate of 76 locations to receive service connections. All 76 locations are herein designated by the Owner on pages 6 and 7 of this section. Private plumbing and building structures differ at each location. No private surveys have been conducted. Quantities and sizes of lines, connections, cleanouts and other fittings which may be required are not defined; however, cleanouts will be installed by the Contractor at each change of direction as required by the particular orientation of individual private residences. The location of tie-ins to private plumbing must be approved by the landowner. The Contractor shall notify the landowner at least 48 hours prior to any work on the property. Immediately after a service extension and residential tie-in is complete, the Contractor shall restore all private property disturbed by construction to a condition acceptable to the landowner. f. Bid Item No. (m) is based on an estimate of 3955 LF of 4-inch diameter PVC sewer line, including trenching, backfill, connections, fittings and cleanouts required to extend service to the 76 proposed residential tie-in locations. Service line cleanouts (4-inch diameter) will proved both at the • utility easement line and at a location generally within five (5) feet of the private residence. g. Bid Item (n) is based on an estimate of 69 locations where service connection tie-ins are not currently anticipated. These 69 locations represent the balance of the lots adjoining the route of the proposed sanitary sewer collection system. Seven (7) of the 69 service stub -outs will require trenching across a roadway. The Owner reserves the right to increase or decrease the number of locations of both service connections and service stub -outs. Single or double service taps will be determined based on field conditions. The Contractor shall be paid for only the number of locations finally completed and based on the unit prices stated in the proposal. • ADDENDUM NO.1 • TO PROJECT MANUAL FOR, CALHOUN COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Prepared by: TESTENGEER, INC. August 20, 1991 The following revisions to the Project Manual for the Wastewater Collection System Improvements, Magnolia Beach Phase Two, shall be made. Insofar as the original Project Manual is inconsistent with this Addendum No.1, this Addendum shall govern. BID FORM Add Bid Item (o). Bid Item (p) shall be added to, and included in the Base Bid, and become a • part of the proposal to be submitted at the Bid Opening. The attached Bid Form has been revised to include Bid Item (p). RECEIVED AUG 2 6 1991 0 • 579 i • Calhoun County Magnolia Beach Phase Two Wastewater Collection System Improvements Ie11171ONCT) M_ <� l�• i N a cY Co,nlr Bidding Firm Address \I i (-,-m T�- -719 oZ- City, State, Zip PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: Wastewater Collection System Improvements PROJECT IDENTIFICATION NO.: Texas Department of Commerce Contract No. 700391 THIS BIlj IS SUBMITTED TO: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • Port Lavaca, Texas 1. The undersigned BIDDER proposes and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to enter into an Agreement with OWNER in the form included in the Contract Documents to complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the Contract Price and within the Contract Time indicated in this Bid and in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2. BIDDER accepts all of the terms and conditions of the Instructions to Bidders, including without limitation those dealing with the disposition of Bid Security. This Bid will remain open for thirty-five (35) days after the day of Bid opening. Bidder will sign the Agreement and submit the Contract Security and other documents required by the Contract Documents within ten days after the date of OWNER's Notice of Award. 3. In submitting this Bid, BIDDER represents, as more fully set forth in the Agreement, that: (a) Bidder has examined copies of all the Contract Documents and of the following addenda, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and also copies of the Advertisement or Invitation to Bid and the, Instructions to Bidders. Number Date / Number Date * 1 AUGUST 20. 1991 (1,— • 2 AUGUST 23. 1991 I v" - A-1 58® (b) MM11 z 3aa.10 ER has examined the site and locality where the Work is to be performed, the legal requirements (federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations) and the conditions affecting cost, the Work and has made such independent progress or performance of investigations as BIDDER deems necessary. • (c) This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, firm or corporation and is not submitted in conformity with any agreement or rules of any group, association, organization or corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a false or sham Bid; firm a corporation BIDDER has not solicited or induced any person, or from bidding; and BIDDER has not sought by collusion to to refrain obtain for himself any advantage over any other Bidder or over OWNER. 4. Bidder will complete the work for the following prices: Base Bid: (a) 23 LF of new 10" PVC sewer line, Constructincluding la- fittings on of and connections, complete and in place at $ I to . per linear foot for a total of: SlocTt�r) DOLLARS $ (b) Construction of 3378_ LF of new 8" PVC sewer line, includin all fittings and connections, complete and in place at $ a per linear foot for a total of: C1eA 101J UPS. Cwt-'ol - EjjL_ 6'*i,—DOLLARS $ 30�vyZ. - (c) Construction of _3_525 LF of new 6" PVC sewer line, • includin all fittings and connections, complete and in place at $ 3s per linear foot for a total of: c7S . DOLLARS $ (d) of 253 LF of trenching, l and Construbackfill,cless than ftion ive feet in depth, complete and in place at $ o• io per linear foot for a total of: 1-6r-) Ge4 -,:Sn DOLLARS $ 57 Gi 3% (e) of backfill,Construcfive feet and atin depth,completeand place at $ D• 1�) per linear foot for a total of: �t F/i�y ti) itin•�� DOLLARS (f) nsstof shoring Per trench etio d CConstruction o le in4�eL$ protection, total of 20 $ —DOLLARS (g) Construction of 21 each new fiberglass manhole assemblies, including cast-iron rings and covers, complete and in place at $ each for a total price of: ou '1DOLLARS $ �S nl��� �Xi,t� tU,(;,,),�-`tiG Dt-S • A-2 1 U"i 4). U% 581 (h) Construction of 3 each new six-inch diameter cleanout assemblies, standard casting, including all fittings and concrete, complete and in place at $ 22h each for.a total ''of1f: Id . TWO .Ij T A1,84 ewl d"I DOLLARS $ (i) Construction of _6 _ each new manhole insert assemblies, complete and in place at $ 1 30�- each for a total of: IA rstLl4_ u., DOLLARS $ 7&U °> (j) Construction of 40 LF of concrete encasement, total of: 2� and in place at $ per linear Twe Mi D LS _DOLLARS $ S o O ,59 (k) Construction of 167 SY of 6" corn pac�ed goad base repair, complete and in place at $ VV P square yard for a total of: T-Cwl D t-C DOLLARS $ 1(17 (% 6 y (1) Construction of _7 each new sanitary sewer service connections, including hook-up Ito private residences, complete and in place at $._lz2 each for a total of: ou SI,(-D, i DOLLARS $ zJq 4 o (m) (n) (o) (P) Construction of 3955 LF of new 4" PVC sanitary sewer service extensions, including trenching, backfilling, cleanouts all fittings and connections, complete and in place at $ . per linear foot for a total of: U ( ,in. DOLLARS Construction of 690 LF of new 4" PVC sanitary service stub-outs,Z pcluding service clamps, complete place at $_(p . — per linear foot for a total of: DOLLARS sewer and in Traffic control barricades for public protection, complete and in place for a lump sum oF. DOLLARS Construction of miscellaneous items including cleanup for a complete project for a lump sum of: OJ PP�1__V 1G11S< IU DOLLARS $ 6U(� m t�i of Rase Bid: (sum of total amount bid for A-3 C J • • 582 S, l�,v Tax Exemption: So that a certificate of exemption from the Texas Limited Sales Excise and Use Tax may be prepared by the OWNER, the following amount is provided as the cost of materials and tangible personal property included in the total bid for Phase I. • �n f>pr� (.o00Z DOLLARS $ 090 5. BIDDER agrees that the Work will be substantially completed within (90) days after the date the Contract Time commences to run, and will be completed within 120 calendar days after the date the Contract Time commences to run. Bidder accepts the provisions of the Agreement as to liquidated damages in the event of failure to complete the Work on time. • • 6. The following documents are attached to and made a Condition of this Bid: (a) Required Bid Security in the form of a bid bond, cashier's check or certified check. (b) A tabulation of Subcontractors and organizations required to be identified in this Bid. (c) Statement Regarding Equal Opportunity Clause. 7. Communications concerning this Bid shall be delivered to the address of bidder indicated below. 8. The terms used in this Bid which are defined in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract included as part of the Contract Documents have the meanings assigned to them in the General Conditions. G' SUBMITTED ON �C1 3C) 195L A-4 5g3 If BIDDER is: An Individual • By (SEAL) (IndividuaPs Name) doing business as Business address: Telephone No. A Partnership 10 Business address: Telephone No. (Corporate Seal) (General Partner) A-5 (SEAL) is C J Attest Business address: ��\cz Ca ,ti i • �� n Telephone No. A Joint Venture By (Name) (A dress) By (Bach joint venture must sign. The manner of signing for each individual, partnership and corporation that is a party to the joint venture should be in the manner indicated above.) •--000-- • A-6 �8aa -0/ .A.M zz) Ev MT) TADULA; ION SHEET EicS WERE RECEIVED IN 7w,— CF=lCOF AT_/4 y Dofo BIDDERS 9r 370 ,,Cv UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT AMDLNjT BID XVQ PUT BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT gyp$ zszol 3 41-19 fi is • r � J BUDGET AMENDMENTS- COUNTY JUDGE, BUILDING MAINTENANCE, MEDICAL BUILDING, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, PCT. 3, COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1, AND COUNTY COURT AT LAW /GENERAL EXPENSES. A motion was made by Commmissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the following Budget'Amendments be approved. [BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: C \ I__ I! _ (Department m`akincY this request) Date: 91 I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account # ------------- 53 Lai L4,ao L4-!56 bsao C. lL�o �999 0 (oa,lo change in total this department Amendment Account N me A_mount-_ - Y U 75, oV n o0 remarks/justification: - -Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 587 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST . To: Calhoun Cqqunty Commissione-¢' Court y005/ �Y01 O� From: ( epartment daking this reques ) Date: � — I - p I I request an amendment to the ma budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account ---Account Name --- Amount Reason ------------------------ (0)A005-009 tkcf%n-N p3000 01-g010— (070�43 Ji�n,aQo� JYyta�aIIL�' Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Y I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: l&)) Date of Commissioners' Court approval: l • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): s BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County pCommissione�rls, Court • From: � 1 wdAu &1 � CQ P(i (Departme t making this request) Date: , CI I request an amendment to the Hq I budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount (11-,)O -,).3 6e )Q a&bhdlVL QJ� UJ3'1 l0o 0- Q033-Lha A;t&p AvAuaa.Au-, (1Qo Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Reason $____� 0__ �' I AUS 3 91991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: ff �,narA : t,�Aiy lJr a \ Date of Commissioners' Court approval: U Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 5Q9 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: County Court at Law No 1 (Department making this request) Date: 8/7 / 1 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account Amendment iF - -Account Name Amount Reason 01 20-10-5101 General Office Supplies $300.00 01 20-10-6210 Telephone Services (300.00) 07 20-10-4705 Temporary Emolovees 1000.00 01 20-10-6160 Court Reporter -Sub )0B3 00 01-aoio- q4(0 01,10(o- t19Yo _I�An�otR n_' � — _ y60 O( aQ10- �I950 a,00 Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: AUG 3 01991 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. J� Signature of official/department head: !iSwc4e'"// Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): I • r� J 590 (BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners, court q C� From: / -4 . A( olo) 1 _ J� _ : / A ('7ia ) (Depa ,,frtment making this request) Date: T —l4 --I • I request an amendment to the o I budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount -----=---------- --------------- ------------- oLaQro-�Ralp6tj n�,�.�1 o o 0 .z Pn g 0 0 0 Net change in total budget •for this department is: Other remarks/justification: • Reason ------------------- I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: i 1tP6l b�Q.uF�n, Date of Commissioners' Court approval:UU Date posted to General Ledger account(s): THE COURT ADJOURNED TO THE GOLDEN CORRAL. 591 SPECIAL SEPTEMBER TERM HELD SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I • BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 3rd day of September, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Termof the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk Helen J. Smith, Commissioner of Prt. 3 was absent. whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of the Citizens Advisory Committee on Redistricting present were Betsy Wilson, Earnest Kabela, R. 0. Haynie, Laura J. Phillips, Lupe Gutierrez, Sr., Elvira Martinez, Jack Wu and Don Lenertz. Also present was David Martinez. After consideration of plans submitted the following motions • were made and voted upon: A motion was made by Betsy Wilson, seconded by Elvira Martinez, that the committee consider only plans 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 (9 being the plan submitted by David and Elvira Martinez). A vote was taken and all 8 members voted for those plans. A motion was made by Elvira Martinez, seconded by Betsy Wilson that the committee eliminate Plan 7 from consideration as it is an incomplete plan. All 8 members voted for this. A motion was made by Don Lenertz, seconded by Earnest Kabela, to consider Plan 8 and dispense with further consideration of Plan 5. A vote was taken and all 8 members present voted for this. A motion was made by Elvira Martinez to accept Plan 9. This motion died for a lack of a second. A motion was made by Betsy Wilson, seconded by Laura Phillips to settle on Plan 8 for the Committees' recommendation. Six members of the committee voted for Plan 8, one person voted no, and one person abstained. The public hearing will be held Friday, September 6th, at 10:00 A.M. • THE COURT ADJOURNED. _592 �i ICG�ea- �i r 1 l l . TAc wL I' u li u� 593 SPECIAL SEPTEMBER TERM HELD 6, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 6th day of September, A.D., • 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk Helen J. Smith, Commissioner of Pct. 3 was absent. whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led.the Pledge of Allegiance. Due to the size of the crowd the Court recessed for 5 minutes to reconvene in Courtroom A. PUBLIC HEARING -REDISTRICTING A public meeting was held for the purpose of receiving public comment on the, redistricting of Commissioners precincts, Justice of the Peace and Constable Precincts, changes in the Election Precincts and polling places. (A sign in sheet follows) Members of the Citizens Advisory Committee on Redistricting present were: Betsy Wilson, Laura J. Phillips, Earnest Kabela, R. 0. Haynie, Elvira Martinez, Louis Butler, Lupe Gutierrez, Sr., and Roger Galvan. Mike Morrison, with the firm of Guinn and Morrison was also present to answer questions. Judge Hartzog advised the audience that the Citizen's Advisory Committee had chosen a plan but that nothing was settled. He suggested they bring out plans 6, 8 and 9 as they were the last three they had taken a look at and see what commments they may have. Mike Morrison explained the plans and there was a lot of input from the audience. Some opposing all plans submitted, some in favor of 6, 8 and 9. There was some comment about re -considering Plan 2-C. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. • al Lf, -7,) I 595 REGULAR SEPTEMBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN HELD SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 • BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 9th day of September, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk Helen J. Smith, Commissioner,Pct.3 was absent.;that morning only. • whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. BUDGETS-1992-PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing was held on the proposed budgets for Calhoun County, Texas. After some discussion a Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following adjustments be made to the 1992 Budget: Road & Bridge ,Pct. One - Add $14,000.00 back into the Budget for Temporary Employees as it was omitted. Emergency Management- Adjust the secretary's salary to equal that of other secretaries - from $19,589 to $20,871. Justice of the Peace, Pct. 1,2,3,4, & 5 - Increase J.P. Pct. 1, 2, 3, and 4 salary by $5200.00 annual salary and Pct. 5 salary by $3000.00 annually. County Clerk- Increase temporary employees to equal that allowed District Clerk - to $7400.00. Sheriff's Dept- Decrease Sheriff Dept. by about • $25,000.00 Investigator put into Budget in error. BUDGET - 1992 A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the 1992 Budget be adopted.: with the above changes included.— M, • PROPOSED • COMMISSIONERS DETAIL AND SUMMARY BUDGETS FILED p AT �Iar O'CLOCK—L_M COUNTY CLERK. CALHOUN COUNTY, 597 HOWARD G. HARTZOG County Judge Calhoun County August 26, 1991 TO: THE CITIZENS OF CALHOUN COUNTY We are submitting for your consideration a proposed budget for the calendar year 1992. To explain some of the factors which have an impact on the 1992 budget and tax rate, we need to go back to 1983. At that time, a decision was made to reduce the fund balances of Calhoun County. Beginning in 1984 the tax rate was decreased from approximately .28 per hundred to .22 per hundred in 1990. The County has, in effect, granted "tax abatement" to all the taxpayers of Calhoun County for the 'past seven years. The fund balances are depleted to a dangerously low condition. The time has come to reduce deficit sending. The county has two options in order to maintain a fund balance of $1.5 million as required by the county's bonding agencies. We can either cut services or increase taxes. The proposed budget attempts to do both. Expenses have been cut where feasible; but realizing that some expenses continue to rise, with the increased activity in the county, we are therefore proposing to increase taxes by .0588 in order to provide adequate county services. There will be an increase of .0675 in order to pay for the hospital bond issue which was voted on by the citizens of Calhoun County. This also includes debt service for the new library. No one likes to raise taxes but in order for our county to remain fiscally sound it will be necessary to increase our tax rate .1263 per one hundred valua- tion. More detailed information on the proposed budget will be.found on the pages that follow. r Howar G. artzog, ou ty Calhoun County, Texas 211 South Ann Street, Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 (512) 553A600 • C J 0 E TAX RATE INFORMATION AND BUDGET SUMMARIES 599 CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE AND ROLLBACK TAX RATE FOR 1992 BUDGET YEAR GENERAL FM&L FUND FUND LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE: LAST YEAR'S OPERATING TAXES LAST YEAR'S DEBT TAXES LAST YEAR'S TOTAL TAXES LAST YEAR'S TOTAL TAX RATE ;!%ij4d,�;:'e:5%'$: ;,%<%iRi,3:�:' Lx.'vi.i.i. is%'.;Y;.:u. ::::?•i!%; THIS YEAR'S EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: u��'""'€""°:•'.;,;SF'i oe�^`# :!x!?%;r;>;; �� %?:; LAST YEAR'S ADJUTED TAXES 2 s! %:3_ «.... %n%3tf;:?.;,�4x�:,,;»$ ���:�: %y.. THIS YEAR'S ADJUSTED TAX BASE THIS YEAR'S EFFECTIVE TAX RATE s; i;C.i?.:%4Rli„n'.['%%?:>3'.'o'�R%?u<0'.<):xn•:i THIS YEAR'S TOTAL EFFECTIVE TAX RATE w+/: 0.2319 <4»;4>:yi?iis.,:..;:ii:4s.�,>::;..i'<:::.: %?:,'4::<!%:<k." !:'Eii`i %%ia>;`: MAXIMUM RATE WITHOUT PUBLICATION #C�a4Si>'S.�'.%i%.Tw4.Ori5+0.v 0.2388 �'Yi;"n:;'< s3vis`d �'•�?a IS YEAR'S ROLLBACK TAX RATE: THIS EA ':e',;3>ii' %g;':%:.°°r2;3":%:%:%:;%:•`::�4,: '?:?;?.�"§'ai#< :;x:iuT LAST YEAR'S ADJUSTED TAXES <:;>?:''.::v:R:.;;';%:%> THIS YEAR'S ADJUSTED TAX BASE THIS YEAR'S EFFECTIVE TAX RATE THIS YEAR'S MAXIMUM RATE THIS YEAR'S DEBT RATE TH IS YEAR'S ROLLBACK RATE B.'.£A'x%:tb 4• t. ab9i%..>6.Yi=3v'�ia%v� THIS YEAR'S TOTAL ROLLBACK RATE 0.4099 LESS: SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT 0.0787 ROLLBACK TAX RATE 0.3312 CALCULATION OF TAXES TO BE COLLECTED FOR 1992 BUDGET YEAR TOTAL ESTIMATED APPRAISED TAX TOTAL COLLECEN TOTAL TYPE VALUE RATE TAXES PERCENT REVENUE aii4:i:•:::.>: J .. .:...$':x:%?�':'%�.:any2.,C,x.p.:.r.> ....: ...:......4x:i''.f:<)FUND<:<,?x.�x>-:.>.'>:9...iQ.4.GENERAL i;;'<3Y:!n,:i.:!......ROAD/BRIDGE%<970tFFARM/MARKET%97(i(F IN .:ii3:%:'ixii.:iii':':..'.;':.i.k<a%•::x t.�44%.i;.,;.,::ix!;:>ixi<:: S J.,.<J..J.4....... i":?.isi>::xik':i`°:%?>.:...;'...>:!;5::<...:.>4. 4381804`!i>`%;:;::,,..' 0.2825 .<.:::;,:.;.>...a9�:<Q�Y°.TOTAL 4 250350 QOGt5''.1,44,1::.....:..9�0 <: ,';.:>....:.'...:.,....DEBT ,} SERVICE >„t,,�,918,13Q: .1,Qt3"�97 TOTALS 0.3500 5,429,121 5,266,247 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENT: HOSPITAL BONDS AND INTEREST 1,013,361 LIBRARY BONDS AND INTEREST 62.585 J 10 • • • • C� N • CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTS r1 U 603 un date: 01/01/80 a 06:13 us date: 09/10/1991 Calhoun County Auditors Office Budget Worksheet Summary Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 BURVEXS.LO2 Page 1 01 GENERAL FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12131/91------t .-Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final d Dept Description 12/31/90 6/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 01-00 REVENUE - GENERAL FUND 4,246,422 4,335,308 8;670,614 4,869,336 4,358,548 4,751,970 -1 90-00 TRANSFERS -GENERAL FUND -274,125 492,313 984,626 400,331 435,958 01 98-00 OTHER FINANCING -GENERAL FU 1,109 2,219 ___________ ___________ -188 ___________ 3,972,297 ___________ 4,828,730 9,657,459 5,269,479 4,794,506 4,751,970 Otal revenue it 00-00 GENERAL FUND 01 00-17 not in system. " _61 15-00 not in system. 11 J1 15-01 not in system. 15-05 COUNTY JUDGE 85,623 " 47,328 94,651 94,171 98,327 103,749 O1 15-10 COMMISSIONERS COURT 73,958 34,133 68,268 104,401 112,501 79,956 --It 15-20 COUNTY CLERK 182,654 88,038 176,073 194,088 194,467 196,359 11 15-25 GENERAL EXPENSES 46,189 -13,490 -26,982 66,643 95,660 115,200 01 15-99 CONTINGENCY 23,582 471 908 1,815 58,000 2,250 58,000 3,950 58,000 3,950 • 01 11 20-05 COUNTY COURT 20-10 COUNTY COURT -AT -LAW 135,839 69,590 139,181 135,502 139,033 147,472 • 31 20-15 JUVENILE COURT 38,607 25,183 50,366 46,358 46,390 46,623 01 20-20 DISTRICT COURT 85,912 32,534 65,067 87,903 87,903 89,006 ' 01 20-25 DISTRICT CLERK 113,855 56,822 113,646 119,829 127,452 131,466 31 20-30 JUSTICES OF PEACE -GENERAL 2,353 1,113 2,226 3,102 3,102 1,602 J1 20-31 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #1 15,985 10,648 21,298 20,640 20,640 26,378 01 20-32 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #2 23,603 11,652 23,304 24,654 24,176 30,217 01 20-33 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #3 14,641 12,850 25.702 24,422 24,472 28,188 31 20-34 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #4 18,072 8,948 17,897 18,468 18,468 24,906 J1 20-35 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #5 9,765 6,005 12,011 12,271 11,413 20,852 01 20-40 APPEALS COURT JUDGES 1,249 602 1,205 1,291 1,291 1,279 31 25-05 DISTRICT ATTORNEY 162,562 69,759 139,520 170,907 187,970 190,142 01 30-05 ELECTIONS 23,205 59 118 14,338 14,352 42,591 01 35-05 COUNTY AUDITOR 166,481 72,344 144,686 146,947 147,097 150,346 _ 01 35-10 COUNTY TREASURER 48,879 25,184 50,371 51,681 56,681 52,376 01 35-15 TAX COLLECTOR 175,114 87,617 175,233 185,448 195,819 101,863 01 35-20 TAX APPRAISAL DISTRICT 89,687 78,505 157,009 114,855 114,855 110,000 01 40-05 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 388,149 207,539 415,084 446,855 452,993 453,589 01 40-10 HEALTH BUILDING 1,081 50,292 27,419 54,837 56,981 4,500 55,420 93,791 01 45-05 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 229,931 129,597 259,198 283,785 300,685 306,750 01 45-10 JAIL OPERATIONS 4,200 4,200 4,200 01 45-15 FIRE PROTECTION -GENERAL 5,099 1,177 2,353 5,119 5,119 11,019 01 45-16 FIRE PROTECTION -PORT LAVAC 6,481 258 516 9,000 9,000 9,000 01 45-17 FIRE PROTECTION-OLIVIA/PT 6,305 361 723 4,839 4,839 11,300 01 45-18 FIRE PROTECTION -POINT COMF 3,559 6,230 12,458 10,000 10,000 10,000 01 45-19 FIRE PROTECTION-SEADRIFT 7,769 810 1,620 5,265 5,165 5,165 -01 45-20 FIRE PROTECTION -PORT O'CON 54 IDS 2,350 2,350 6,150 01 01 45-21 FIRE PROTECTION-A.I.M. BEA 45-30 CONSTABLES -GENERAL 605 1,206 656 1,313 4,200 4,200 10,786 2,200 9,758 • -PRECINCT #1 9,296 6,161 12,322 10,786 01 45-31 CONSTABLE 8,207 5,357 10,716 10,785 10,785 9,758 01 45-32 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT #2 604 un date: 01/01/80 W 06:13 us date: 09/10/1991 • 01 GENERAL FUND d Dept Description 1 45-33 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT p3 vt 45-34 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT #4 01 45-35 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT H5 i1 45-40 SHERIFF ,1 45-45 SHERIFF NARCOTICS 01 45-50 ADULT PROBATION 01 45-55 JUVENILE PROBATION 11 45-60 HIGHWAY PATROL 11 45-65 BUILDING INSPECTION 01 55-05 AMBULANCE OPERATION -GENERA O1 55-06 AMBULANCE-OLIVIA/PORT ALTO 11 55-07 AMBULANCE -POINT COMFORT J1 55-08 AMBULANCE-SEADRIFT 01 55-09 AMBULANCE -PORT O'CONNOR 11 55-10 AMBULANCE-A.I.M. BEACHES 11 55-15 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 01 55-20 MOSOUITO CONTROL 01 55-25 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 11 55-30 INDIGENT HEALTHCARE 11 55-35 MENTAL HEALTH 01 60-05 LIBRARY 01 60-10 MUSEUM D1 60-15 HISTORICAL COMMISSION 01 60-20 PARKS AND RECREATION •01 65-05 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATIO 01 70-05 VETERANS SERVICE 01 70-10 INDIGENT EXPENSE -AUTOPSIES 01 70-15 DIRECT ASSISTANCE 01 70-20 AID TO DEPENDENT CHILDREN 01 70-25 AID TO AGING 01 75-05 EXTENSION SERVICE Total expenditures Excess revenue over expenditures C J Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet Summary 8URVEXS.L02 Page 2 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31191------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 6/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 7,891 5,109 10,220 10,785 10,785 9,758 9,173 5,527 11,055 10,786 10,786 9,758 6,296 5,263 10,525 10,787 10,787 9,758 834,177 443,874 887,751 842,706 881,169 910,878 117,820 55,877 111,757 148,934 130,055 153,249 6,117 5,155 10,311 6,000 6,236 8,000 34,228 27,234 54,468 39,531 40,154 52,790 8,400 4,486 8,970 12,958 12,958 16,652 24,686 12,257 24,516 25,269 25,182 8,143 8,538 326 652 12,600 12,600 29,600 1,757 50 100 3,000 3,000 3,000 376 285 571 2,100 2,100 2,200 1,162 189 379 1,850 1,850 1,850 1,016 59,651 119,301 60,730 60,730 2,230 235 2,050 2,050 4,050 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 225,928 31,377 11,642 23,283 31,397 31,397 31,397 153,243 88,979 177,953 200,982 201,759 208,702 475,307 213,212 426,425 550,000 550,000 550,000 3,036 3.,036 6,072 4,536 4,536 4,536 129,001 56,310 112,617 136,001 136,237 149,419 4,450 1,862 3,726 4,379 4,579 4,928 3,793 251 501 6,935 6,735 5,435 17,990 8,776 17,552 21,275 21,275 22,775 6,500 6,500 13,000 6,500 6,500 7,000 7,361 3,593 7,187 7,850 7,850 8,054 6,270 8,128 16,255 10,000 10,000 10,000 4,825 1,450 2,900 10,000 10,000 5,000 1,200 1,200 1,000 27,897 13,908 27,816 27,980 27,980 27,980 67,611 29,556 59,114 ----------- 95,476 95,669 ----------- 99,511 ----------- ---------'- ----------- 4,456,799 ----------- 2,284,437 ----------- 4,568,890 5,056,931 5,190,220 5,368,782 -484,502 2,544,293 5,088,569 212,548 -395,714 -616,812 695 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending.06/30/1991 iBus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEx.L02 Page 2 01 00-17 not in system. Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Us Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1141 Created by posting I 1 I I 1 I I j Sub-totat Total expenditures ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ----- _----- ___________ I` • • 606 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 Page 3 01 01-00 REVENUE - GENERAL FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- *-Year Ending 12/31/92-* Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 3101 CURRENT TAXES ! 2,622,521 1 2,945,643 1 5,891,286 1 3,000,000 1 2,918,366 1 2,830,000 1 3102 DELINQUENT TAXES 1 261,517 1 16,138 1 32,275 1 50,000 1 1 1 3111 DISCOUNT ON CURRENT TAXES 1 ! 4 1 a 1 2 1 I I 3121 PENALTY AND INTEREST -CURRENT 1 6,257 1 5,408 ! 10,816 1 10,000 1 ! I 3122 PENALTY & INTEREST -DELINQUENT 1 17,067 1 5,633 1 11,266 1 17,500 I I ! 3125 TAX ATTORNEY COMMISSIONS ! 10,606 1 4,775 I 9,549 1 17,500 1 1 1 3150 SALES TAXES 1 352,952 1 910,000 1 1,820,000 1 1,000,000 1 910,000 1 1,200,000 1 3180 MIXED BEVERAGE TAXES 1 10,970 1 6,367 ! 12,734 1 12,000 ! 10,000 1 12,000 ! 3191 GAME REFUGE -IN LIEU OF TAXES 1 28,092 1 22,077 1 44,154 1 25,000 1 25,000 ! 20,000 ! 3192 HOUSING AUTHORITY -IN LIEU TAX 1 592 1 1 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 3201 BEER PERMITS 1 505 1 110 1 220 1 60 1 20 1 60 1 3202 BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSES 1 6,018 1 7,898 1 15,797 1 12,000 1 5,000 1 12,000 1 3211 BUILDING PERMITS 1 4,352 1 1,826 1 3,652 1 5,000 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 3212 SEPTIC TANK PERMITS 1 1,925 1 375 1 750 1 700 1 700 1 700 1 •3213 3214 MOBILE HOME PERMITS 1 SEWAGE & WATER SYSTEM PERMITS 1 10 ! 1 60 1 1 120 1 1 40 1 1 1 1 10 ! 1 3215 STATE SEPTIC TANK PERMITS ! 1 20 1 40 1 200 1 1 100 1 3219 OTHER BUILDING PERMITS 1 300 1 1 1 1 500 1 100 1 3301 SEWER PLANT-FED.GRANT-ADMINIST 1 2,238 1 1 1 1 1 I 3302 EMERGENCY MGMT-FEDERAL GRANTS 1 19,648 1 1 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 1 3303 DISTRICT ATTORNEY GRANTS 1 13,650 1 1 1 1 1 1 3304 FEDERAL HEALTH GRANTS -CLERK 1 16,383 1 6,438 1 12,876 ! 12,876 ! 12,876 1 12,000 1 3305 FED. HEALTH GRANTS -SANITARIAN 1 17,629 1 14,022 1 28,044 1 25,000 ! 28,044 1 25,000 1 3307 LIBRARY -PORT LAVACA I 1 1 1 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 0 0 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 Page 4 01 01-00 REVENUE - GENERAL FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget .. 3308 LIBRARY -POINT COMFORT 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 4,000 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 3309 FED. HEALTH GRANTS-S.L.I.A.G. 1 4,236 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 3314 FORMOSA IMPACT STUDY-FED.GRANT I I ! I ! ! ! 3317 TPW GRANT-CHOC.SAYOU PARK 1 1,967 1 1 1 1 1 I 3401 CONSTABLES 1 100 1 1,830 1 3,660 1 3,000 ! ! 3,000 1 3402 DISTRICT ATTORNEY 1 5,271 1 1,249 1 2,497 1 1,000 1 4,000 1 600 1 3403 COUNTY CLERK I 90,128 1 39,621 1 79,242 1 70,000 1 77,000 1 65,000 1 3404 TAX COLLECTOR 1 85,520 1 45,692 1 91,384 1 74,800 1 74,800 I 75,000 1 3405 TAX COLLECTOR -OTHER FEES ! 1,324 1 657 1 1,315 1 1,000 ! 800 1 1,000 1 3410 DISTRICT CLERK 1 19,139 1 10,530 1 21,059 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 16,000 1 3411 JUSTICE OF PEACE -PRECINCT 01 1 2,842 1 355 1 710 1 820 1 400 1 600 1 3412 JUSTICE OF PEACE -PRECINCT #2 1 -62 1 430 1 860 1 660 1 400 1 500 ! • 3413 JUSTICE OF PEACE -PRECINCT #3 1 1 30 1 60 1 60 1 400 1 50 1 --3414 JUSTICE OF PEACE -PRECINCT #4 1 50 1 260 1 520 ! 400 ! 400 ! 400 1 3415 JUSTICE OF PEACE -PRECINCT #5 1 1 80 ! 160 1 140 1 400 1 140 1 --3419 GAME WARDENS 1 456 1 35 I 70 1 120 1 33 1 120 1 3420 PHOTOCOPY SALES -MISCELLANEOUS 1 84 1 13 1 26 1 14 1 ! 1 3421 PHOTOCOPY SALES -COUNTY CLERK 1 I I 1 ! 1 ! 3422 PHOTOCOPY SALES -SHERIFF 1 26 1 1 1 1 1 1 3423 PHOTOCOPY SALES -LIBRARY 1 905 1 369 1 738 1 900 1 500 1 900 1 3431 CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING 1 2,051 1 969 1 1,937 1 2,000 1 1,600 1 1,800 1 3432 JURY FEES 1 665 1 265 1 530 1 520 I 300 1 500 1 3433 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SINGS 1 547 1 259 1 518 1 510 1 300 1 500 1 3434 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION 1 2,117 1 996 1 1,992 1 1,100 1 1,100 1 1,800 1 • Im Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 01-00 REVENUE - GENERAL FUND GIs Description 3435 PROBATE FILING FEES I 3436 JUDICIAL PERSONNEL TRAINING 1 3437 COUNTY JUDGE I 3438 SHERIFF I 3439 PRISONER LODGING -PORT LAVACA I 3440 PRISONER LODGING -PT. COMFORT 1 3441 PRISONER LODGING-SEADRIFT 1 3442 PRISONER LODGING -VICTORIA 1 3443 PRISONER LODGING -OTHER 1 3445 VOTER LIST SALES 1 3446 DWI VCR FEES I 3447 HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS 1 3448 HEALTH DEPARTMENT TESTING I •3449 HEALTH DEPT. FAMILY PLANNING 1 3450 NOTARY FEES 1 3451 COURT REPORTER FEES I 3452 NON-RESIDENT LIBRARY CARDS I 3453 INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES-D.A. I 3460 OPERATORS/CHAUFFEURS LICENSE I 3461 CRIME STOPPERS FUND I 3462 DEF.DRIVING ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 1 3463 DRIVERS LICENSE ADMINIST. FEES 1 3464 EXP.LICENSE PLATE ADMINIST.FEE 1 3465 EKP.INSPECTION STKR ADMIN. FEE 1 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 5 Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------• *-Year Ending 12/31/92-t Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90- 06/30/1991 - --_ Actual _-_- Actual Tot Budget Budget -- _Budget 222 1 99 1 198 1 110 1 110 1 150 1 368 1 173 1 346 1 200 1 200 1 300 1 - 2,845 1 790 1 1,580 1 1,200 1 1,650 1 1,200 1 41,200 1 16,685 1 33,370 1 30,000 1 22,000 1 35,000 1 29,402 1 15,450 1 I 30,900 1 ! 20,000 1 8,000 1 I 1 20,000 1 1 ! 440 1 ! 1 1 1 1 ! ! I I I 1 243 1 I 16 ! 31 1 I 1 I I 1 1 940 1 190 1 379 1 1 700 1 1 9,648 1 3,247 1 6,494 1 4,000 I 1 5,000 1 711 1 452 1 904 1 750 1 1 750 1 ! 4,500 1 I 1,845 1 I 3,690 1 2,500 I 1 1 1 1 3,000 1 ! ! ! I 1 1 1 1,000 1 2,000 1 1,600 1 2,400 1 1,600 1 1,274 1 548 1 1,095 1 690 1 1 600 1 941 1 51 111 151 1 1 5,050 1 3,067 1 6,133 1 6,000 1 1 7,000 1 60 1 70 1 140 1 200 1 1 200 1 250 1 50 1 100 1 200 1 1 200 1 330 1 90 1 180 1 160 1 1 160 I 609 Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 .Page 6 01 01-00 REVENUE - GENERAL FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget _ 3466 DEF. ADJUDICATION ADMIN. FEE 1 50 1 100 1 200 1 160 1 1 160 1 3501 FINES -JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #1 1 20,204 1 5,581 1 11,161 1 11,000 1 12,000 1 11,000 1 3502 FINES -JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #2 1 48,362 1 22,280 1 44,560 1 50,000 1 43,000 1 50,000 1 3503 FINES -JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #3 1 27,903 1 17,308 1 34,616 1 25,000 1 10,000 1 35,000 1 3504 FINES -JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #4 1 16,220 1 7,692 1 15,385 1 15,000 1 12,000 1 15,000 1 3505 FINES -JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #5 1 12,149 1 4,119 1 8,239 1 7,000 1 7,000 1 6,000 1 3510 LIBRARY FINES 1 1,911 1 1,313 1 2,627 1 2,000 1 1,500 1 1 3520 BOND FORFEITURES 1 I I I I 1 1 3601 INTEREST 1 335,211 1 170,343 1 340,687 1 300,000 1 120,000 1 250,000 1 3701 RENT -AGRICULTURE BUILDING 1 2,947 1 1,493 1 2,986 1 3,000 ! 2,000 1 2,000 1 3702 RENT -COURTHOUSE ANNEX 1 3,500 ! 2,250 1 4,500 1 3,500 ! 1 3,500 1 • 3703 RENT -HEALTH UNIT BUILDING I I 1 I 1 I 1 3704 RENT-BAUER BUILDING, PAVILLION 1 738 1 625 1 1,250 1 750 1 I 750 1 3720 LAND RENT 1 500 1 1,600 1 3,200 1 1,600 1 1,000 1 1,600 1 3751 OIL AND GAS ROYALTIES I 1 I I 1 I 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE ! 56,813 1 60 1 120 ! ! 500 ! ! 3902 REBATES -RESTITUTION 1 700 1 157 1 314 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 3903 REBATES -ATTORNEY FEES 1 6,333 1 1,596 1 3,192 1 750 1 1,500 1 750 1 3905 VENDING MACHINE COMMISSIONS 1 290 1 99 1 198 1 250 1 1 250 1 3906 INMATE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS ! 138 1 ! ! 1 ! ! 3920 TELEPHONE SERVICE I 20,184 1 12,922 1 25,845 1 20,000 1 1 20,000 1 3921 GTE PHONE SERVICE 1 -17,515 1 -10,100 ! -20,201 1 -16,000 1 1 -16,000 1 3922 MCI PHONE SERVICE I -1,862 1 -1,342 1 -2,684 1 -2,700 1 1 -2,500 1 3923 AT&T PHONE SERVICE 1 1 -261 1 -521 1 1 1 1 • 610 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Oi 01-00 REVENUE - GENERAL FUND Gla Description ____ ______________________________ • 3934 PUB.CONTRIB.-COMM.ALERT NETWRK ! 3950 ESCHEATS -TAX COLLECTOR ! 3951 ESCHEATS -JUSTICES OF PEACE ! 3960 INSURANCE RECOVERIES ! 3961 WORKERS' COMP.INS.RECOVERIES ! 3990 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE I Sub -total Total revenue • Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotats BURVEX.1.02 Page 7 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget ! ! ! ! 608 1 10,000 1 -51 ! 4 1 9 ! -80 ! 1 -80 1 — 352 1 192 1 383 1 600 1 1 600 1 1 1,041 1 2,082 1 2,000 1 1,041 1 1 ! ! I I I 1 1,170 1 25 1 50 1 1 1 500 1 4,246,422 4,335,308 8,670,614 4,869,277 4,358,548 4,751,970 -------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 4,246,422 4,335,308 8,670,614 4,869.277 4,358,548 4,751,970 i 3 611 • Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 -- Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 10 01 15-05 COUNTY JUDGE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12131/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Arvualiied Projected This year Proposed Final GLa Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 40,702 1 20,351 1 40,702 1 40,702 1 40,702 1 41,923 1 4404 SECRETARY 1 20,263 1 9,608 1 19,215 1 20,263 1 18,263 1 20,871 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 860 1 504 1 1,008 1 860 1 3,000 1 1,000 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 4,730 1 2,421 1 4,841 1 4,730 1 4,979 1 5,111 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 7,943 1 3,220 1 6,440 1 7,400 1 11,346 1 11,346 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 4,530 1 1,501 1 3,001 1 4,500 1 4,585 1 4,722 1 r 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 199 1 248 1 495 1 247 1 249 1 280 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 63 1 19 1 38 1 35 1 64 1 66 1 Subtotal 79,290 37,872 75,740 78,737 83,188 85,319 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 164 1 788 1 1,577 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,500 1 • 5111 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES I I I I 1 1 200 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 6 1 132 1 264 1 300 1 285 1 500 1 5310 DUES 1 25 1 1 1 100 1 75 1 100 1 5320 PUBLICATIONS 1 1 195 1 390 1 300 1 340 1 300 1 Sub -total 195 1,115 2,231 1,700 1,700 2,600 6101 CONTRACT SERVICES I I I 1 I I I 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,317 1 1,470 1 2,940 1 2,200 1 1,900 1 3,000 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 126 1 361 1 722 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,500 I 6231 LEGAL NOTICES 1 I 1 1 45 1 45 1 100 1 6305 AUTO ALLOWANCES 1 3,022 1 1,511 1 3,022 1 3,022 1 3,022 1 3,022 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY I I I I I 1 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 1 292 1 585 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,500 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 835 1 424 1 847 1 1,445 1 1,445 1 1,500 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 318 1 1 1 500 1 500 1 500 I • 612 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 •Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 15-05 COUNTY JUDGE Actual for Budget Worksheet YTD Actual With Subtotals +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ BURVEX.1.02 +-Year Ending Page 11 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I ! 50 1 100 1 200 1 205 1 300 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 1 178 1 356 1 178 ! 178 1 178 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER 1 6 1 7 1 13 1 10 1 19 1 30 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 9 1 74 1 147 1 90 1 81 1 200 1 -- Sub -total 5,633 4,367 8,732 9,690 9,395 11,830 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT ! ! 3,844 1 7,688 1 3,844 1 3,844 1 200 1 7401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 505 1 130 1 260 1 200 1 200 1 3,800 1 Sub -total 505 3,974 7,948 4,044 4,044 4,000 Total expenditures ----------- 85,623 ----------- 47,328 ---------------------- 94,651 94,171 ----------- 98,327 ----------- 103,749 ........... • • 613 Run date: 08/23/91 B D8:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotats BURVEX.1.02 Page 12 01 15-10 COMMISSIONERS COURT Actual for YTD Actual .-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ a -Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 267 1 193 1 385 I 500 I 500 1 500 I 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I 3,598 1 810 1 1,621 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 2,000 1 5191 MEETING SUPPLIES I 1 11 1 22 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 5310 DUES 1 2,072 1 1,639 1 3,277 1 2,220 1 2,220 1 2,500 1 5311 DE -GO -LA DUES I 1 I I 1 100 1 Too I Sub -total 5,937 2,653 5,305 6,820 6,920 5,200 6110 LEGAL SERVICES 1 13,460 1 11,596 1 23,192 1 49,290 1 49,290 1 30,000 I 6130 AUDITING SERVICES 1 11,400 1 1 1 11,500 1 11,500 1 11,500 1 6170 GRANT SERVICES 1 2,432 1 726 1 1,453 1 10,000 I 9,265 1 5,000 1 6181 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. I I I I I I I • 6182 CRISIS HOTLINE SERVICES 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 8,000 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 6183 WOMEN-S CRISIS CENTER SERVICES I 1 I 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 6184 CHILD WELFARE 1 3,950 1 1 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 2,000 1 6185 CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE 1 9,600 1 9,360 1 18,720 1 9,600 1 9,600 1 10,600 1 6186 FORMOSA IMPACT STUDY 1 3,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 1 14 1 29 I 75 1 75 1 100 I 6231 LEGAL NOTICES 1 2,288 1 567 1 1,134 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 2,000 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 3,873 1 4,748 1 9,496 1 5,000 1 13,805 1 5,500 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I I 1 1 1 100 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 1 356 1 712 1 356 1 356 1 356 1 6920 PERMITS 1 400 1 1 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 6998 SO.TX JUDGES/COMM.ASSOC.EXPENS I I I 1 1,000 1 930 1 1,000 ! 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 237 1 113 1 227 1 310 1 310 1 400 1 Sub -total 54,640 31,480 62,963 97,581 105,581 73,756 • 614 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 13 01 15-10 COMMISSIONERS COURT Actual for Y7D Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ •.Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Description 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget •Gla ------- 2__12/31/90_ =__— =_ _Budget 7901 BUILDING RENOVATION 1 13,381 1 1 I I 1 1,000 1 Sub -total 13,381 1,000 Total expenditures ----------- 73,958 ----------- 34,133 ---------------------- 68,268 104,401 ----------- ----------- 112,501 79,956 ----------- • CA 615 -Run date: 01/01/80 N 06:03 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 lus date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 1 01 15-20 COUNTY CLERK Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------• ~-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget i101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 34,170 1 17,085 I 34,170 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 35,195 1 4403 ADMINISTRATIVE DEPUTIES ! 76,055 I 38,117 1 76,234 I 76,234 I 76,23E 1 78,522 ! ..705 TEMPORARYEMPLOYEES ! 1 1,164 1 2,327 1 2,500 ! 3,100 I 7,400 I I 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 8.432 1 4,210 1 8,420 1 8,648 1 8,648 1 9,266 1 i920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 26,730 1 11,124 1 22,247 1 29,371 1 29,150 1 29,158 1 4930 RETIREMENT ^4940 1 8,190 1 3,938 1 7,875 1 8,303 1 8,303 1 8,552 1 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 356 1 439 1 878 1 449 I 449 I 532 ! 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 228 1 75 1 149 1 237 1 237 1 258 1 ! Sub total 154,161 76,152 152,300 159,912 160,291 168,883 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 6,197 1 2,337 1 4,674 1 5,500 I 5,500 1 5,500 I • 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 5,070 1 929 1 1,858 1 4,500 1 4,500 1 4,500 I 5310 DUES 1 20 1 1 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 Sub total 11,287 3,266 6,532 10,030 10,030 10,030 6121 DOCUMENT SERVICE FEES 1 I I I I I I 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,132 1 671 1 1,343 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 2,698 1 2,135 1 4,271 1 2,700 1 2,700 1 2,700 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 410 1 313 1 627 1 750 1 750 1 1,000 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I I I ! 6510 MICROFILMING 1 607 1 201 1 401 I 750 1 750 1 750 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 198 1 516 1 1,031 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 6530 COMPUTER RENTALS 1 7,592 1 3,888 1 7,776 1 9,500 1 9,500 1 9,500 1 6560 COPIER RENTALS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 890 1 1 1 1 1 1 662G IMSURANCE-ERRORS & OMISSIONS 1 1,887 ! 1 1 1,950 1 1,950 1 - I is 616 tun date: 01/01/80 a 06:03 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 lus date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 2 01 15-20 COUNTY CLERK Actual for YTD Actual -------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- .-Year Ending 12/31/92-- Yea= Ending 12/31/90 Thru 06/30/1991 30/1991 Actual Actual Projected Actual This year Tot Budget Proposed Budget nal Budget • GIB Description Descri_______=====xx=====____= =x_ xAnnualized _ _ _- ====Budget $943 RECORDING 1 1 1 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 1 1 1 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS I Sub -total 15,414 7,724 15,449 23,250 23,250 16,550 7401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT I I I I I 1 1 7403 TYPEWRITERS 1 1,792 1 896 1 1,792 1 896 1 896 1 .896 1 Subtotal 1,792 896 1,792 896 896 896 Total expenditures ___________ 182,654 ___________ 88,038 ___________ ___________ 176,073 194,088 ___________ 194,467 ___________ 196,359 --- ________ L • 617 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 — Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 15-25 GENERAL EXPENSES Gla Description 4940 WORKMEN'S COMP. -SUSPENSE Sub -total -- 6211 TELEPHONE -GAME WARDENS 6213 COMMUNITY ALERT NETWORK 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT 6640 INSURANCE -LIABILITY & PROPERTY Sub -total 7603 TAPES FOR 911 Sub -total Total expenditures C] Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals 8URVEX.L02 Page 16 Actual for YTD Actual +------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 1-15,160 1 -30,321 1 -30,321 1 1 1 -15,160 -30,321 -30,321 1 163 1 94 1 187 1 240 1 240 1 200 1 1 1,571 1 1,574 1 3,148 1 2,522 1 3,130 1 10,000 1 1 1,192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 361 2 1 4 1 771 771 1 1 43,227 1 1 1 94,125 1 92,213 1 90,000 1 46,1B9 1,670 3,339 96,964 95,660 100,200 - I I I I 1 1 15,000 1 15,000 • 46,189 -13,490 -26,982 66,643 95,660 115,200 • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 06/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 17 01 15-99 CONTINGENCY Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-♦ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 1 1 50,000 1 50,000 I 50,000 1 6995 ADVANCE-CHOC. BAYOU PARK PROJ. 1 1,967 ! 6996 MILITARY RETIREMENT BUY -IN ! ! I 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 _ 6997 VACATION PAY UPON TERMINATION ! 4,996 ! I I 3,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 16,619 1 I I 1 I I — Sub -total 23,582 58,000 58,000 58,000 Total expenditures ---------------------- 23,582 ----------- ----------- 58,000 ----------- 58,000 ----------- 58,000 ----------- _. • is • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 18 01 20-05 COUNTY COURT Actual for YTD Actual +-------for Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 612.0 LEGAL SERVICES -COURT APPOINTED I 1 1 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 6152 MENTAL COMMITMENT SERVICES 1 471 1 908 1 1,815 1 1,000 1 2,700 1 2,700 1 6153 DEFENSE ATTORNEY IN LUNACY 1 1 1 1 450 1 450 1 450 1 6161 COURT REPORTER -SPECIAL 1 1 1 f 300 1 300 1 300 1 Sub -total 471 908 1,815 2,250 3,950 3,950 Total expenditures _ 471 ----""'•- 908 ""----"' ------ 1,815 ---- 2,250 "'----"" 3,950 ----------- 3,950 ----------- • 620 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 19 01 20-10 COUNTY COURT -AT -LAW Actual for YID Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Gle Description Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 4101 ELECTED 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tat Budget Budget Budget OFFICIAL I 59,095 1 29,547 1 59,095 1 59,095 1 59,095 1 60,868 I 4305 COURT REPORTER 1 27,681 1 13,840 1 27,681 1 27,681 1 27,681 1 28,511 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES I 3,755 ! 1,930 1 3,860 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 4807 JURORS -PETIT ! 6,958 1 3,972 1 7,944 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 7,500 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 6,329 1 3,434 1 6,869 1 6,469 1 6,469 1 6,559 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 8,665 1 3,973 1 7,946 1 7,946 1 11,466 1 11,465 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 6,448 1 3,185 1 6,370 1 6,526 1 6,526 1 6,722 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION I 295 ! 387 1 773 1 376 ! 387 1 436 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT ! 94 1 30 1 60 1 91 1 91 1 93 1 Sub -total 119,320 60,298 120,598 115,584 119,115 124,554 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 1,850 1 632 1 1,263 1 950 1 950 1 950 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 650 1 413 1 827 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 5370 DUES ! 1 235 1 470 1 240 1 240 1 240 1 Sub -total 2,500 1,280 2,560 1,790 1,790 1,790 • 6120 LEGAL SERVICES -COURT APPOINTED 1 11,111 1 7,240 1 14,480 1 12,000 1 12,000 1 15,000 1 6150 PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES I 1 I I I 1 I 6154 SHERIFF FEES -OTHER COUNTIES ! 45 1 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 6160 COURT REPORTER -SUBSTITUTE 1 270 1 1 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 949 1 587 1 1,173 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 6221 POSTAGE ! 365 1 7 1 14 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 750 1 1 1 1,300 1 1,300 1 1,300 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 329 1 1 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS ! 1 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 Sub -total 13,819 8,012 16,023 17,978 17,978 20,978 621 Run date: 08/23/91 B 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 20-10 COUNTY COURT -AT -LAW ala Description 7502 LAW BOOKS Sub -total Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Wcrksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 20 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 200 1 1 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 200 150 150 150 ........... 135,839 ............ 69,590 ........... ----------- 139,181 135,502 ----------- 139,033 ---------------------- 147,472 • • 622 Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 20-15 JUVENILE COURT • Gle Description 4101 ELECTED OFFICIALS 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 4920 GROUP INSURANCE ! 4930 RETIREMENT ! 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! Sub-totak 6120 LEGAL SERVICES -COURT APPOINTED 1 6125 WITNESS FEES 1 6150 PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES 1 - 6151 PARENTING SERVICES I 6154 SHERIFF FEES -OTHER COUNTIES 1 6155 JUVENILE DETENTION SERVICES ! Sub -total • Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 21 Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------* +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 ---- Actual --_ _Actual Tot Budget _-- -Budget Budget 10,937 10,937 1 5,468 1 10,937 1 10,937 1 10,937 1 11,155 1 608 1 415 1 829 1 849 1 849 1 854 1 1 404 1 809 1 875 1 907 1 898 1 812 1 391 1 782 1 823 1 823 1 838 1 24 1 29 1 58 1 29 1 29 1 33 1 12,381 6,707 13,415 13,513 13,545 13,778 3,052 1 1,377 1 2,754 1 8,000 1 8,000 1 8,000 1 1 1 1 145 1 145 1 145 1 175 1 1 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,000 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1 1 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 21,999 1 17,099 1 34,197 1 22,000 1 22,000 1 22,000 1 26,226 18,476 36,951 32,845 32,845 32,845 ----------- 38,607 ----------- 25,183 ---------------------- 50,366 46,358 ----------- 46,390 ----------- 46,623 ........... 623 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals 8URVEX.L02 Page 22 01 20-20 DISTRICT COURT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4101 ELECTED OFFICIALS 1 1,812 1 906 1 1,812 1 1,812 1 1,812 1 1,812 1 4305 COURT REPORTERS 1 22,012 1 11,524 1 23,048 1 23,048 1 23,048 1 23,740 1 4801 JURORS -PETIT 1 8,400 1 504 1 1,008 1 12,500 1 12,500 1 12,500 1 4802 JURORS -GRAND 1 3,122 1 1,674 1 3,348 1 3,750 1 3,750 1 3,750 1 4805 JURY COMMISSIONERS 1 100 1 50 1 100 1 110 1 110 1 110 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 1,822 1 953 1 1,906 1 1,916 ! 1,916 1 1,955 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I I I 1 I 1 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 1,770 1 916 1 - 1,832 1 1,870 1 1,870 1 1,922 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 128 1 142 1 283 1 157 1 157 1 176 ! 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 66 1 22 1 44 1 70 1 70 1 71 1 • Sub -total 39,232 16,691 33,381 45,233 45,233 46,036 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 150 I 1 1 150 1 150 1 450 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 -114 I 1 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 Sub -total 36 500 500 800 6120 LEGAL SERVICES -COURT APPOINTED 1 42,034 1 14,894 1 29,789 1 32,250 1 32,250 1 32,250 1 6122 CONTRIB.TO EXPENSE-BALIFF FUND 1 2,436 1 1 1 4,431 1 4,431 ! 4,431 1 6123 CONTRIB.TO EXPNS-JUDICIAL DIST 1 599 1 599 1 1,198 1 599 1 599 1 599 1 6126 ROOM 8 BOARD -JURORS 1 105 1 42 1 83 1 1,000 ! 1,000 1 1,000 1 6127 INTERPRETER SERVICES 1 375 1 1 1 500 ! 500 1 500 1 6154 SHERIFF FEES -OTHER COUNTIES 1 I 1 1 200 1 200 1 200,1 6161 COURT REPORTER -SPECIAL 1 186 1 211 1 422 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES I I I I I 1 I 6221 POSTAGE I 1 1 I I I 1 6307 MEAL ALLOWANCE 1 1 27 1 53 1 1 30 ! 1 • 624 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 •01 20-20 DISTRICT COURT Gla Description 6321 TRAVEL -COURT REPORTER-24TH I 6322 TRAVEL -COURT REPORTER-135TH 1 6323 TRAVEL -COURT REPORTER-267TH I 6324 TRAVEL -COURT REPORTER -ROVING 1 6325 TRAVEL -SPECIAL DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Sub -total Total expenditures C • Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals 8URVE%.LO2 Page 23 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 108 1 1 1 235 1 205 1 235 1 94 1 1 1 235 1 235 1 235 1 95 1 40 1 81 1 235 1 235 1 235 1 312 1 1 1 235 1 235 1 235 1 300 1 30 1 60 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 46,644 15,843 31,686 42,170 42,170 42,170 ----------- --------------------------------- ---------------------- ........... 85,912 32,534 65,067 87,903 87,903 89,006 625 Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 24 01 20-25 DISTRICT CLERK Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gin Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 34,170 1 17,085 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 35,195 1 4403 ADMINISTRATIVE DEPUTIES 1 38,920 1 19,460 1 38,920 1 38,920 1 38,920 1 40,088 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 4,980 1 3,142 1 6,284 1 7,400 1 7,400 1 7,400 1, 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 5,973 1 2,981 1 5,962 1 6,166 1 6,166 1 6,325 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 11,137 1 4,362 1 8,725 1 10,000 1 17,623 1 17,622 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 5,431 1 2,682 1 5,365 1 5,497 1 5,497 1 5,662 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 254 1 311 1 621 1 321 1 321 1 363 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 132 1 43 1 86 1 137 1 137 1 143 1 Sub -total 100,997 50,066 100,133 102,611 110,234 112,798 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 2,916 1 1,176 1 2,352 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 2,062 1 2,257 1 4,514 1 - 4,540 1 4,540 1 4,540 1 5310 DUES 1 20 I 1 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 Sub -total 4,998 3,433 6,866 8,590 8,590 8,590 _ 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,077 1 606 1 1,212 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 3,300 1 2,336 1 4,673 1 3,300 1 3,300 1 4,000 1 - 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 265 1 203 1 406 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 I I I I 1 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 336 1 1 1 360 1 360 1 460 1 6560 COPIER RENTALS I I 1 I I I ! 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 488 1 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 6620 INSURANCE -ERRORS 8 OMISSIONS 1 1,816 1 1 1 1,900 1 1,900 1 1,900 1 6670 INSURANCE-THEFT/LOSS 1 I 1 1 90 1 90 1 90 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS I 1 1 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 Sub -total 7,282 3,323 6,647 8,628 8,628 9,428 • • 626 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Calhoun County Budget Worksheet Auditors Office With Subtotals Fiscal year to period ending BURVE%.1.02 06/30/1991 Page 25 01 20-25 DISTRICT CLERK Actual for Year Ending YID Actual Thru +-------For Year Annualized Ending 12/31/91.....-r Projected This year 4-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-* Final • Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 7101 COMPUTER EOUIPMENT I I I I I I I 7402 FILE CABINETS 1 578 1 1 1 1 1 650 1 Subtotal 578 650 Total expenditures ----------- 113,855 ----------- 56,822 ---------------------- 113,646 119,829 ----------- 127,452 ----------- 131,466 ----------- • .• 627 Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 20-30 JUSTICES OF PEACE -GENERAL Actual for Year Ending — Gla Description 12/31/90 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 26 YTD Actual +...----For Year Ending 12131/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Thru Ar alized Projected This year Proposed Final 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4801 JURORS -PETIT 1 96 1 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 I 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 ..Sub -total 96 602 602 602 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 2,257 1 1,113 1 2,226 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 1,000 1 - Sub -total 2,257 1,113 2,226 2,500 2,500 1,000 Total expenditures _______________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ -. --_ 2,353 1,113 2,226 3,102 3,102 1,602 • C I m Run date: 01/01/80 a 06:01 Sus date: 09/10/1991 Calhoun County Budget Worksheet Auditors Office With Subtotals Fiscal year to period ending BURVEK.1_02 06/30/1991 Page 1 • 01 20-31 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT ki Actual for Year Ending YTD Actual Thru --------For Year Annualized Ending 12/31/91 Projected ----- -t This year +-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-a Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 2223 Created by posting ! ! ! ! ! I I Subtotal 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 10,652 1 5,326 1 10,652 1 10,652 1 10,652 1 15,852 1 4405 CLERK I ! I I I 1 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 815 ! 381 1 763 1 817 ! 817 1 1,213 ! 4920 GROUP INSURANCE ! 2,472 1 3,447 1 6,893 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 4930 RETIREMENT I 791 1 391 1 782 1 801 1 801 1 1,193 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 35 1 42 1 84 ! 42 I 42 1 70 ! 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT ! 1 ! I I I ! Sub -total 14,765 9,587 19,174 18,187 18,187 24,203 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 300 1 191 1 382 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 149 I 1 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 • 5310 DUES Sub -total 1 25 474 1 25 1 216 50 1 432 25 775 1 25 1 775 25 1 775 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES ! 393 I 208 1 416 1 500 1 500 1 400 ! 6221 POSTAGE 1 250 1 33 1 66 1 250 1 250 1 250 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 1 74 1 149 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I ! I I I 1 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 103 ! 231 1 463 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I 1 1 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE ! 1 121 1 242 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 ! 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER I I I I I I ! 6999 MISCELLANEOUS i I I I I 1 ! Sub -total 746 845 1,692 1,678 1,678 1,400 Total expenditures ----------- 15,985 ----------- 10,648 ----------- ----------- 21,298 20,640 ----------- 20,640 ----------- 26,378 ----------- 629 Run date: 01/01/80 W 06:01 Bus date: 09/10/1991 01 20-32 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #2 Gla Description 2223 Created by posting I Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL I 4405 CLERK 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 4950 Created by posting 1 Sub -total 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 5310 DUES I Sub -total 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 6450 TRAINIRG-REGISTRATIOR FEES t 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS I Sub -total Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06%30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 2 Actual for YTO Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 13,319 1 6,659 I 13,319 1 13,319 I 13,319 1 18,519 I I 1,019 1 I 490 1 I 980 1 I 1,021 ! I 1,021 1 1,417 1 6,194 1 2,937 1 5,874 1 5,874 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 990 1 489 1 978 1 1,002 1 1,002 1 1,393 1 44 1 53 1 106 1 532 1 53 1 82 I I 21,566 I 10,628 1 21,257 I 21,748 1 21,270 ! 27,286 381 1 328 1 655 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 272 1 72 1 144 1 250 ! 250 1 250 1 25 1 1 I 1 1 25 1 678 400 799 650 650 675 574 1 331 1 661 1 650 I 650 1 650 1 328 1 17 1 35 1 528 1 528 1 528 1 121 1 28 1 56 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 186 1 70 1 140 1 400 I 400 1 400 I 1 t ! l 1 1 150 1 1 1 150 I 150 1 150 1 1 1 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 1 1,359 624 I 1,248 2,256 1 2,256 2,256 .......... ........... 23,603 ........... 11,652 ........... 23,304 ........... 24,654 ........... 24,176 ........... 30,217 • Ll 0 Run date: 01/01/80 a 06:01 t Bus date: 09/10/1991 B, • 01 20-33 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT k3 Actualfor Year Ending G1a Description 12/31/90 2222 Created by posting I I 2223 Created by posting I I Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 9,406 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 720 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 1,595 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 699 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 31 ! 4950 Created by posting I I Sub -total 12,451 -5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ! 61 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 13 1 5310 DUES I ! • Sub -total 74 6124 CONTRIBUTION TO EXPENSE 1 I 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 483 1 6221 POSTAGE ! 175 1 6305 OFFICE ALLOWANCES 1 858 ! 6306 OFFICE ALLOWANCES I 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 600 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I ! 6426 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 I • alhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 dget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 3 YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12131/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Fine( 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget I I 1 ! I I 1 ! I I 4,703 1 9,406 1 9,406 1 9,406 1 14,606 1 371 1 741 1 787 1 787 1 1,118 1 1,337 1 2,675 1 5,875 1 5.875 1 5,875 1 345 1 690 1 707 1 707 1 1,099 1 36 1 72 1 36 1 36 1 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 6,792 13,584 16,811 16,811 22,763 502 1 1,003 1 350 1 502 1 450 1 4! 9 1 100 1 100 1 150 1 25 1 50 1 25 1 25 1 25 1 537 1,062 475 627 625 1 1 I 1 1 334 1 ,667 1 400 1 400 1 600 1 78 1 156 1 150 1 150 1 400 1 1 1 572 1 1 1 143 1 286 1 286 1 858 1 1 215 1 431 1 600 1 600 1 800 1 I 1 I I I 129 1 259 I 500 1 348 1 600 1 1 1 1 I I I 631 • ^,un date: 01/01/80 O 06:01 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 lus date: 09/10/19,91 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEx.1_02 Page 4 01 20-33 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT p3 Actual for YTO Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ — Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget i610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 I 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER I I I I 1 I 1 $705 UTILITIES 1 I I I 1 I 800 I 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 I I I 1 I 300 1 iub-total 2,116 1,077 2,155 2,686 2,534 3,500 7401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT ! I I I I 1 800 1 7903 PORTABLE BUILDING 1 1 4,450 1 8,901 1 4,450 1 4,500 1 500 1 Subtotal 4,450 8,901 4,450 4,500 1,300 Total expenditures 14,641 12,850 25,702 24,422 ___________ 24,472 ___________ 28,188 ___________ • C I 632 un date: 01/01/80 0 06:01 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 us date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 5 01 20-34 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT K4 Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- --Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Gin Description___________________12/31/90- 06/30/1991 ===—Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget =_= Budget '223 Created by posting ! ! I I ! I I Sub -total 001 ELECTED OFFICIAL I 9,311 ! 4,655 1 9,311 1 9,311 1 9,311 1 14,511 1 4405 CLERK ! 1 I I 1 ! 1910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 712 1 329 1 658 1 715 1 715 1 1,111 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 6,194 1 2,937 1 5,874 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 4930 RETIREMENT ! 692 1 342 1 684 1 700 1 700 1 1,092 1 4940 WORKMEN-S COMPENSATION 1 30 1 39 1 78 1 39 1 39 1 64 1 4950 Created by posting I ! I I I ! ! Sub -total 16,939 8,302 16,605 16,640 16,640 22,653 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ! 150 1 65 1 131 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 71 ! 1 1 75 1 75 1 100 1 5310 DUES 1 25 1 25 1 50 1 25 1 25 1 25 1 Sub -total 246 90 181 250 250 275 • 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 22 1 10 1 20 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 6221 POSTAGE ! 231 I 60 1 120 1 200 I 200 I 300 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 596 1 211 1 422 1 600 1 600 1 800 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY ! ! I I I I 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 18 1 97 1 193 1 400 1 400 1 500 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES ! I I ! I I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I ! 1 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 ! 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER ! ! I I I I I 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ! ! I I 1 ! Sub -total 867 556 1,111 1,578 1,578 1,978 • 633 •. -,un date: 01/01/80 0 06:01 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 ',us date: 09/10/1991 Budget 1lorksheet With Subtotals BURVEX-L02 Page 6 01 20-34 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT #4 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-. Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget '401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sub -total 20 Total expenditures ________ 18,072 ___________ 8,948 ___________ ___________ 17,897 18,468 ______ ____ 18,468 ___________ 24,906 ___________ • • 634 -un date: 01/01/80 a 06:01 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.L02 Page 7 us 01 20-35 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT N5 Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/3l/91------+ .-Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Gla Descript-un____=_______—_____ =-12/31/90_ 06/30/1991 Actual Actual -Tot Budget Budget =_= Budget !223 Created by posting ! I I I I I I Sub -total ,101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 7,717 1 3,858 1 7,717 1 7,717 1 7,717 1 10,717 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 590 1 317 1 634 1 658 1 658 1 820 1 I - I 1 1 5,875 1 1920 GROUP INSURANCE ! I 4930 RETIREMENT 1 573 1 283 1 566 1 581 1 581 1 806 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 25 ! 31 1 62 1 31 1 31 1 48 1 4950 Created by posting I 1 I I I I I Sub -total 8,905 4,489 8,979 8,987 8,987 18,266 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES I 1 ISO 1 300 1 250 1 250 1 150 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I 2 1 1 1 25 1 25 1 25 1 ! 25 1 50 1 25 1 25 1 25 1 5310 DUES I Sub -total 2 175- 350 300 300 200 CONTRIBUTION TO EXPENSE 1 I I I I I I •6124 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES I 1 21 1 42 1 40 1 40 1 100 1 6221 POSTAGE I 1 18 1 37 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 6305 OFFICE ALLOWANCES I 858 1 1 1 858 1 1 858 1 6306 OFFICE ALLOWANCES I 1 429 1 858 1 858 I 858 1 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY I 1 509 1 1,018 1 600 1 600 1 800 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I I I I I I 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 1 186 1 371 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I I I I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I I I I 1 1 I 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 1 178 1 356 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 is 635 •. -lun date: 01/01/80 a 06:01 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 lus date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.LO2 Page 8 01 20-35 JUSTICE OF PEACE-PCT M5 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER I I 1 I I 1 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 3ub-total 858 1,341 2,682 2,984 2,126 2,386 Total expenditures ___________ 9,765 ___________ 6,005 ___________ ___________ 12,011 12,271 ___________ 11,413 ___________ 20,852 ________-_ • • IQ Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 )1 20.40 APPEALS COURT JUDGES • GLa Description ----------------------- 2223 Created by posting >ub-total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIALS MO SOCIAL SECURITY W50 Created by posting Sub -total Total expenditures • 0 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget worksheet with Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 35 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 I I I I I 1 1 1,160 1 559 1 1,119 1 1,188 1 1,188 1 1 89 1 43 1 86 1 103 1 103 1 1 I 1,249 I 602 I 1,205 1 1,291 1 1,291 ___________ ___________ 1,249 ___________ 602 ___________ 1,205 ___________ 1,291 1,291 1, 188 I r 91 1 i 1,279 1,279 637 Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 36 01 25-05 DISTRICT ATTORNEY Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4302 INVESTIGATOR 1 25,204 1 1 1 25,960 1 1 1 4402 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS 1 33,218 1 20,810 1 41,619 1 33,218 1 58,422 1 60,175 1 4404 SECRETARIES 1 38,214 1 19,460 1 38,920 1 38,920 1 38,920 1 40,088 1 4405 CLERK 1 14,229 1 7,197 1 14,394 1 14,394 1 14,394 1 14,826 1 4701 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE 1 1 1,828 1 3,656 1 8,000 1 8,000 1 8,000 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 8,481 1 3,753 1 7,505 1 9,172 1 9,172 1 9,416 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 17,473 1 5,213 1 10,426 1 14,500 1 29,372 1 29,371 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 8,237 1 3,484 1 6,968 1 6,500 1 8,403 1 8,655 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 361 1 2,904 1 5,808 1 1,800 1 2,904 1 540 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 333 1 94 1 187 1 360 1 360 1 370 1 Subtotal 145,750 64,743 129,483 152,824 169,947 171,441 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 2,363 1 887 1 1,774 1 4,200 1 4,200 1 4,200 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 414 1 340 1 680 1 2,500 1 2,465 1 2,500 1 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 1,302 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 5310 DUES 1 272 1 216 1 432 1 330 1 365 1 330 1 Sub -total 4,351 1,442 2,B85 7,030 7,030 7,030 6125 WITNESS FEES 1 179 1 228 1 456 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,751 1 802 1 1,605 1 3,000 1 3,111 1 3,111 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 811 1 375 1 749 1 1,000 1 1,029 1 1,319 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 105 I 1 1 150 I 150 1 150 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 899 1 1 1 1 1 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 2,152 1 312 1 625 1 750 1 750 1 1,050 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 1 755 1 1,510 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 2,OOQ I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 126 1 70 1 140 1 850 1 650 1 650 1 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 37 01 25-05 DISTRICT ATTORNEY Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91---...+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ • Die Description _Die __scrip---------------=-==-c-= Year Ending 12/31/90 Thru 06/30/1991 30/1991 Annualized _ Actual Projected Actual ual year t Tot Tot Budget _— Proposed Budget __--BFinal Budget 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 1 1,614 1 -2 1 -3 1 1 I ! 6531 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE 1 I I 1 I ! I 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 178 I 1 1 147 1 147 1 147 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 471 1 1 1 1 1 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTERS 1 63 1 80 1 161 1 90 1 90 1 90 1 6680 INSURANCE -NOTARY BONDS 1 71 1 71 1 142 1 71 1 71 1 71 1 6930 PHYSICALS I 7 1 1 1 45 1 45 1 45 1 Sub -tote( 8,427 2,691 5,385 9,303 9,243 9,833 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1 2,365 ! I I I I I T502 LAW BOOKS 1 1,669 1 883 1 1,767 1 1,750 1 1,750 1 1,838 I Sub -total 4,034 883 1,767 1,750 1,750 1,838 Total expenditures ----------- 162,562 ----------- 69,759 ---------------------- 139,520 170,907 ----------- 187,970 ---------------------- 190,142 • 11 639 Run date: 08/23/91 D 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 30-05 ELECTIONS GIs Description 4825 ELECTION JUDGES AND CLERKS I 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION I Sub -total 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 -5150 ELECTION SUPPLIES I Sub -total 6231 LEGAL NOTICES I 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 6540 BUILDING RENTALS I Sub -total 7101 BALLOT TABULATOR I Sub -total Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 38 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- - +-Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 11,202 I 1 1 7,000 1 7,000 1 7,000 1 32 1 42 1 84 1 28 1 42 1 31 1 11,234 42 84 7,028 7,042 7,031 2 1 1 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 11,700 1 1 1 6,500 1 6,500 1 6,500 1 11,702 6,600 6,600 6,600 121 1 17 I 34 1 110 1 110 1 110 1 148 1 1 1 1 1 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 1 I 1 250 1 1 250 1 1 1 250 1 269 17 34 710 710 710 1 1 1 1 1 28,250 1 28,250 ----------- 23,205 ----------- 59 ---------------------- 118 14,338 ----------- 14,352 ---------------------- 42,591 • 640 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 35-05 COUNTY AUDITOR • Gle Des==ipt=un___________________ 4201 APPOINTED. OFFICIAL I 4401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHIEF 1 4402 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I 4930 RETIREMENT I 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION I 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT I Subtotal 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 5310 DUES I Sub -total • 6101 CONTRACT SERVICES 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY I 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 6531 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTERS I • Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 39 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 --- _Actual _-- -Actual Tot Budget --_ _Budget -- -Budget 34,682 1 17,341 1 34,682 1 34,682 1 34,682 1 35,722 1 23,252 1 11,626 1 23,252 1 23,252 1 23,252 1 23,950 1 38,920 1 19.460 1 38,920 1 38,920 1 38,920 1 40,088 1 7,408 1 3,619 1 7,239 1 7,418 1 7,418 1 7,632 1 24, 775 1 11,748 1 23,496 1 23,497 1 23,497 1 23,497 1 7,197 1 3,555 1 7,109 1 7,284 1 7,284 1 7,502 1 315 1 396 1 771 1 386 1 386 1 438 1 291 1 92 1 184 1 291 1 291 1 300 1 136,840 67,827 135,653 135,730 135,730 139,129 2,274 1 1,595 1 3,190 1 3,050 1 3,050 1 3,050 1 I I I I 1 1 566 1 433 1 865 1 900 1 900 1 900 1 175 1 75 1 150 1 250 1 250 1 250 1 3,015 2,103 4,205 4,200 4,200 4,200 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 714 1 334 1 668 1 1,200 1 1,350 1 1,200 1 825 1 2 1 4 1 825 1 825 1 825 1 24 1 3 1 6 1 125 1 125 1 125 1 550 1 378 1 756 I 750 1 750 I 750 1 1 1,000 1 1 120 1 1 240 1 1 1,000 1 1 1,000 1 1 1,000 1 4,150 1 1 1,361 1 1 2,721 1 1 1,700 1 1,700 1 1,700 1 128 1 216 1 433 1 1 217 1 1 217 1 1 217 1 641 Run date: 08/23/91 B 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 35-05 COUNTY AUDITOR GIs Description ._ 6680 INSURANCE -NOTARY BONDS 1 6930 PHYSICALS 1 --6999 MISCELLANEOUS I Sub -total 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1 Sub -total Total expenditures • Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 40 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ 4-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 71 1 I 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 1 I 1 501 501 501 150 1 I 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 7,612 2,414 4,828 7,017 7,167 7,017 19,014 1 I I 1 1 1 19,014 ----------- 166,481 ----------- 72,344 ----------- ----------- 144,686 146,947 ----------- 147,097 ----------- ......----- 150,346 is 3 Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 • Oi 35-10 COUNTY TREASURER Gle Description 2223 Created by posting I Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I 4930 RETIREMENT 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION I 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT I Sub -total 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES I • 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I 5310 DUES I Sub -total 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 6231 LEGAL NOTICES 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I 6531 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS I Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.LO2 Page 41 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget I I 1 I I 34,170 1 17,085 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 35,195 1 1 1 1 450 1 450 1 450 1 2,614 1 1,284 1 2,568 1 2,653 1 2,653 1 2,727 1 6,194 1 2,937 1 5,874 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 5,875 1 2,539 1 1,254 1 2,508 1 2,570 1 2,570 1 2,647 1 112 1 136 1 273 1 138 1 138 1 157 1 1 1 21 21 21 45,629 22,696 45,393 45,858 45,858 47,053 678 1 1 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 I I I I 1 1 94 1 46 1 92 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 I 772 I 46 I 92 1 1,350 1 1,350 1 1,350 181 1 117 1 234 1 360 1 360 1 360 1 1,500 1 1,188 1 2,376 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 274 1 I 237 1 I 474 1 800 1 800 1 800 1 474 I 390 1 I 781 1 I 750 1 1 750 1 1 750 1 1 1 1 30 1 1 60 1 1 500 1 1 500 I 1 500 1 1 1 1 443 1 1 886 1 I 500 1 1 Soo I 1 I 643 Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 42 01 35-10 COUNTY TREASURER Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------- *-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annuatixed Projected This year Proposed Finat Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 666D INSURANCE-COMPU7ERS 1 24 1 37 1 75 1 38 1 38 1 38 1 6921 SALES TAX PERMIT 1 25 1 1 1 25 1 25 1 25 1 Sub -total 2,478 2,442 4,886 4,473 4,473 3,973 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT I I I 1 1 5,000 1 1 Sub -total 5,000 TotaL expenditures ----------- 48,879 ----------- 25,184 ---------------------- 50,371 51,681 ------- ---- 56,681 ----------- ....... 52,376 • • 644 Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 43 01 35-15 TAX COLLECTOR Actual for YTD Actual *-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------* *-Year Ending 12/31/92-* Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Gle Desc=ipH on___________________ __12/31/90- 06/30/1991 =__ _Actual ___ _=cruel Tot Budget _Budge[ _Budget 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 34,682 1 17,341 1 34,682 1 34,682 1 34,682 1 35,722 1 4403 ADMINISTRATIVE DEPUTIES 1 76,234 1 38,117 1 76,234 1 76,234 1 76,234 1 78,522 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES I I I 1 I 1 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 8,485 ! 4,170 1 8,341 1 8,496 1 8,496 1 8,740 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 19,803 1 9,407 1 18,814 1 20,000 1 29,371 1 29,371 1 4930 RETIREMENT ! 8,241 1 4,071 1 8,141 1 8,341 1 8,341 1 8,592 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION i 362 1 443 1 885 1 443 1 443 1 502 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 229 1 72 1 145 1 229 1 229 1 236 1 Sub -total 148,036 73,621 147,242 148,425 157,796 161,685 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 4,990 1 2,448 1 4,896 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 5,800 1 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES ! I 1 1 1 1 750 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I ! ! I 1 1 300 1 5310 DUES ! 180 1 130 I 260 1 275 1 275 1 180 1 Sub -total 5,170 2,578 5,156 6,275 6,275 7,030 • 6111 DELINQUENT TAX ATTORNEY FEES 1 8,099 1 4,820 1 9,640 1 12,000 1 12,000 1 12,000 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES ! 2,086 T 1,122 I 2,244 1 2,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 1,988 1 806 1 1,612 1 5,500 1 5,500 1 2,600 1 6231 LEGAL NOTICES I ! I I I I I 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY I I I 1 I I I 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 550 1 509 1 1,018 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 518 1 260 1 520 1 1,050 1 1,050 1 1,050 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 2,363 1 853 1 1,705 1 2,700 1 2,700 1 3,500 1 6531 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE 1 6,000 1 3,000.1 6,000 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 is 645 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 • - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX402 Page 44 01 35-15 TAX COLLECTOR Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------ + a -Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Ole Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 272 1 1 1 500 1 500 1 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTERS 1 32 1 48 1 96 1 48 1 48 1 48 1 6670 INSURANCE-THEFT/LOSS 1 .1 1 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 6680 INSURANCE -NOTARY BONDS I I I 1 1 I I "- Sub -total 21,908 11,418 22,835 30,748 31,748 29,148 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT I I I I 1 1 4,000 1 Sub -total 4,000 Total expenditures ----------- 175,114 ----------- 87,617 ---------------------- 175,233 185,448 ----------- 195,819 ----------- 201,863 ---------'- 646 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 45 01 35-20 TAX APPRAISAL DISTRICT Actual for YTD Actual *-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- *-Year Ending 12/31/92-• Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • GIs Description___________________ 12131/90_ 06/30/1991 _Actual ===—Actual Tot Budget _Budget =_ _Budget 6140 TAX COLLECTION SERVICES ! 29,101 ! 29,728 1 59,456 1 45,000 ! 45,000 I 40,000 1 6141 TAX APPRAISAL SERVICES I 60,586 1 48,777 1 97,553 ! 69,855 1 69,855 1 70,000 1 Sub -total 89,687 78,505 157,009 114,855 114,855 110,000 Total expenditures ----------- 89,687 ----------- 78,505 ---- ------ ----------- 157,009 114,855 ........... 114,855 ........... 110,000 ----------- C • 647 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 46 O1 40.05 BUILDING MAINTENANCE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIB Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIAL 1 24,324 1 12,162 1 24,324 1 24,324 1 24,324 1 25,054 1 4231 ASSISTANT SUPERVISOR I 20,276 1 10,138 1 20,276 1 20,276 1 20,276,1 20,884 1 4306 JANITORS 1 71,247 1 39,812 1 79,624 1 91,280 1 91,280 I_ 94,020 1 4307 PAINTER 1 18,256 1 9,128 1 18,256 1 18,256 1 18,256 1 18,804 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 10,259 1 5,278 1 10,556 1 11,806 1 11,806 1 12,146 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 35,833 1 17,590 1 35,179 1 40,000 1 46,138 1 46,993 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 9,964 1 5,225 1 10,451 1 11,556 I 11,556 1 11,939 1 4940 WORKMEN-S COMPENSATION 1 7,389 1 8,879 1 17,758 1 10,205 I 10,205 1 11,563 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 402 1. 136 1 271 1 442 1 442 1 476 1 Sub-totat 197,950 108,348 216,695 228,145 234,283 241,879 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES I 1 1 1 50 I 50 1 50 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 68 1 86 1 172 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 774 1 125 1 249 1 900 1 900 I 900 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES 1 66 1 32 1 64 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 5410 TOOLS 1 63 1 1 1 300 1 300 I 300 I 5501 BUILDING SUPPLIES/PARTS 1 12,997 1 9,618 1 19,235 1 16,000 1 15,520 1 16,000 1 5502 YARD SUPPLIES/REPLACEMENTS 1 91 1 256 1 513 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES 1 7,590 1 1,786 1 3,573 1 8,500 1 8,500 1 8,500 1 Sub -total 21,649 11,903 -23,806 26,500 26,020 . 26,500 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 351 1 208 1 416 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 I I 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I 1 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 1 3,900 1 7,800 1 3,400 1 4,900 1 3,600 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 I 1 1 250 1 250 1 250 1 • • 0 • 0 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 40-05 BUILDING MAINTENANCE GIs Description 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT 1 6706 UTILITIES -COURTHOUSE AND JAIL I 6707 UTILITIES -AG BLDG, FAIRGROUNDS 1 6708 UTILITIES -COURTHOUSE ANNEX I 6709 UTILITIES -HEALTH DEPARTMENT I 6710 UTILITIES -MAIN LIBRARY I 6711 UTILITIES-SEADRIFT LIBRARY I 6712 UTILITIES -PT. COMFORT LIBRARY I 6713 UTILITIES -PT. O'CONNOR LIBRARY 1 6714 UTILITIES -NEW MAIN LIBRARY I 6741 GARBAGE COLLECTION -FAIRGROUNDS I 6751 REPAIRS -COURTHOUSE AND JAIL I 6752 REPAIRS -AG BLDG, FAIRGROUNDS I 6753 REPAIRS -COURTHOUSE ANNEX I 6754 REPAIRS -HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1 6755 REPAIRS -MAIN LIBRARY I 6756 REPAIRS-SEADRIFT LIBRARY I 6757 REPAIRS -NEW MAIN LIBRARY I 6758 REPAIRS -RODEO ARENA I 6759 REPAIRS -FAIRGROUNDS BALL PARK 1 6930 PHYSICALS I Sub -total 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT I Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 47 Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget I 1 1 500 1 332 1 22 1 44 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 69,260 1 29,726 1 59,452 1 72,000 1 72,000 1 72,000 1 24,248 1 11,018 1 22,037 1 24,000 I 24,000 1 24,000 1 15,889 1 6,711 1 13,423 1 22,000 1 22,000 1 20,000 1 3,956 1 2,249 1 4,498 1 3,500 1 3,500 1 4,500 1 5,884 1 3,794 1 7,589 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 1,901 1 966 1 1,932 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 1,010 1 546 1 1,093 1 1,100 1 1,100 1 1,100 1 788 1 166 1 333 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 1,500 1 665 1 8,184 1 16,369 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 829 1 483 1 966 1 550 1 550 I 900 1 8,432 1 9,262 1 18,525 1 17,900 1 12,675 1 17,000 1 6,850 1 519 1 1,038 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 6,000 1 1,368 1 1 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 1,500 1 1,829 1 520 1 1,040 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 623 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1 I 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 I 1 1 1 500 1 85 1 222 1 444 1 1,400 1 1,400 1 1,400 1 650 1 195 1 389 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 I I 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 144,950 78,691 157,388 163,610 179,885 183,260 2,100 1 .I 1 1 4,205 1 1 649 Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 • Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX-1.02 Page 48 01 40-05 BUILDING MAINTENANCE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-t Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GLa Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 7316 FLOOR BUFFER 1 1 1,217 1 2,435 1 1,200 1 1,218 1 1 7317 VAC, MOP, TRASH CANS l 1 400 1 800 1 400 1 400 l 1 7318 YARD EQUIPMENT 1 1 480 1 960 1 500 1 482 1 1 7319 DRYER FOR JAIL I I 1 I ! 1 450 1 7331 A/C UNIT FOR ANNEX 1 21,500 1 1 1 1 1 1 7903 PORTABLE BUILDING I 1 I I 1 1 1,500 1 7911 IMPROVEMENTS-L.LEAGUE PARK 1 1 6,500 1 13.000 1 6,500 1 6,500 1 1 Sub -total 23,600 8,597 17,195 8,600 12,805 1,950 - Total expenditures ----------- 388,149 ----------- 207,539 ---------------------- 415,084 446,855 ----------- 452,993 ----------- 453,589 ----------- • 650 Run date: 08/23/91 9 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 49 01 40-10 HEALTH BUILDING Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gta Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 6705 UTILITIES 1 1,081 1 1 1 1 3,000 1 1 ' 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS I I I 1 1 1,500 1 1 Sub -total 1,081 4,500 Total expenditures ----------- 1,081 ----------- ---------------------- ----------- 4,500 ----------- ----------- • is Run date: 01/01/80 a 06:00 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 1 01 45-05 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31191------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIAL 1 13,508 1 6,754 1 13,508 1 13,508 1 13,508 1 30,000 1 4404 SECRETARY 1 18,657 1 9,328 1 18,657 1 18,657 1 18,657 1 20,871 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 244 1 696 1 1,392 ! 800 1 800 1 1,200 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 2,479 1 1,271 1 2,541 1 2,528 1 2,528 1 3,984 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 5,414 1 1, 733 1 3,466 1 8,812 1 8,899 1 11,559 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 2,390 1 1,140 1 2,279 1 2,419 1 2,419 1 3,826 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 1,702 1 2,082 1 4,164 1 2,082 1 2,082 I 4,994 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 97 1 31 1 62 1 99 1 99 1 157 1 Subtotal 44,491 703 23,035 1 406 1 46,069 813 1 48,905 835 48,992 1 835 1 76,591 1,000 1 • 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 - 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 168 1 22 1 43 1 350 1 35U 1 350 1 5140 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1 124 1 174 1 349 1 300 1 300 1 500 1 5210 RADIO EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 1 136 1 84 1 168 1 300 1 300 1 500 1 5310 DUES 1 75 1 100 1 200 1 100 1 100 1 100 I Sub -total 1,206 786 1,573 1,885 1,885 2,450 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,706 1 820 1 1,639 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 57 1 94 1 188 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 6241 RADAIR SERVICES 1 I I 1 1 1 550 1 6305 Created by posting I I I I I I 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 1 620 1 1,640 1 - 750 1 1,321 1 1,250 1 6330 TRAVEL EXPENSE -REIMBURSABLE 1 1 1,074 1 2,148 1 2,148 1 1 2,400 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 800 1 I I ! I 1,000 1 - 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 341 1 233 1 465 1 500 1 429 1 750 1 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 1 500 1 1,000 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 • um Run date: 01/01/80 a 06:00 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus data: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 2 81-45-05r [tlBRGEHBYn9AR[881F9T------- AttD06rf6ndingYlg/3C108It Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • _GIs Description_===—�____________12/31190_ -06/30/1991 =__ =Actual Actual -Tot Budget ===—Budget Budget 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER 1 10 1 57 1 115 1 58 1 58 1 125 1 6930 PHYSICALS I I 1 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 Sub -total 2,914 3,598 7,195 6,191 4,543 8,810 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1 1,681 1 1 1 1 1 3,750 1 7401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 I I I I 1 1 7602 RADIO EQUIPMENT ! ! I I l 1 2,190 1 Sub -total 1,681 5,940 Total expenditures ........... 50,292 ........... 27,419 ........... ........... 54,637 56,981 ........... 55,420 ........... 93,791 ----- • CJ wd • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtota Ls BURVEX.L02 Page 52 01 45-10 JAIL OPERATIONS Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tat Budget Budget Budget 4301 CHIEF 1 24,561 1 12,280 1 24,561 1 24,561 1 24,561 1 25,298 1 4303 LAW ENFORCEMENT DEPUTIES 1 79,474 1 50,414 1 100,829 1 108,665 1 108,665 1 111,519 1 4309 COOK 1 14,420 1 7,210 1 14,420 1 14,420 I 14,420 1 14,853 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 718 1 75 1 150 1 800 1 800 1 800 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 9,116 1 5,252 1 10,505 1 11,373 1 11,373 1 11,664 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 27,118 1 12,325 1 24,650 1 41,120 1 40,920 1 41,119 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 8,801 1 5,131 1 10,262 1 11,104 1 11,104 1 11,406 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 5,860 1 6,959 1 13,918 1 8,545 1 8,545 1 9,681 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 358 1 133 1 266 1 447 1 447 1 460 1 • Sub-totaL 17G,426 99,779 199,561 221,035 220,835 226,800 $101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 1,234 1 1,085 1 2,170 1 1,700 1 2,200 1 2,000 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 973 1 464 1 928 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 5550 GROCERIES 1 45,954 1 17,417 1 34,835 1 33,000 1 49,000 1 49,000 1 5555 PRISONER CLOTHING AND SUPPLIES 1 2,034 1 716 1 1,432 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 Sub -total 50,195 19,682 39,365 38,200 54,700 54,500 6156 PRISONER MEDICAL SERVICES 1 7,118 1 2,859 1 5,718 1 13,700 1 13,700 1 13,700 1 6174 FEMALE PRISONER LODGING 1 1 6,160 1 12,320 1 8,500 1 8,500 1 8,500 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 763 1 349 1 699 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,500 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I I 1 1 6930 PHYSICALS 1 155 1 327 1 653 1 200 1 800 1 600 1 6940 UNIFORMS 1 1,024 1 441 1 882 1 1,150 1 1,150 1 1,150 1 Sub -total 9,060 10,136 20,272 24,550 25,150 25,450 7332 REFRIGERATOR I 1 I I I 1 1 7601 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV 1 250 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Subtotal 250 Total expenditures ----------- 229,931 ----------- 129,597 ---------------------- 259,198 283,785 ----------- 300,685 ----------------"'--- 306,750 I654 Run date: 08/23/91 O 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 45-15 FIRE PROTECTION -GENERAL Gle Description 6685 INSURANCE-VOL. FIREMEN-S COMP. I Sub -total Total expenditures • i Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 53 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ ♦-Year Ending 12/31/92-• Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget I I 1 4,200 1 4,200 1 4,200 1 4,200 4,200 4,200 ----------- ------- --- ---------------------- 4,200 ----------- 4,200 ----------- 4,200 ----------- 655 • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 —Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.LO2 Page 54 01 45-16 FIRE PROTECTION -PORT LAVA Actual for YTD Actual i-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------t ♦-Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES I 1 1 1 819 1 819 1 819 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES I I 1 1 900 1 900 1 900 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES I I I I I I I Sub -total 1,719 1,719 1,719 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 216 1 849 1 1,697 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I I 1 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 1,573 1 328 1 656 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 Sub -total 1,789 1,177 2,353 3,400 3,400 3,400 7203 FIRE TRUCK 1 I I I I I 1 7302 RESCUE EQUIPMENT 1 1,540 1 1 1 1 1 ! • 7303 SMOKE EJECTOR 1 940 1 1 1 1 1 I 7304 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL QUICK KIT 1 830 1 1 1 1 1 1 7315 HOSES AND NOZZLES I I I I 1 1 5,900 1 Sub -total 3,310 5,900 Total expenditures ----------- 5,099 ----------- 1,177 ----------- ----------- 2,353 5,119 ----------- 5,119 ----------- 11,019 ----------- C Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 55 01 45-17 FIRE PROTECTION-OLIVIA/PT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12131191------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • ====331 eee==-_ __= e=====1,000 =��==1, 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIESa===== I I 1 l I 1, 000 I 000 I 5240 TIRES AND TUBES I I I 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES I 108 1 1 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 Sub -total 439 1,600 1,600 1,600 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 118 1 194 1 388 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I I I I -' 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT 1 1,138 1 64 1 128 1 1,700 1 1,700 1 1,700 1 Sub -total 1,256 258 516 4,200 4,200 4,200 7305 TURNOUT CLOTHING-5 SETS 1 2,983 1 1 1 1 1 1 7306 NOZZLES (3), FIRE AXES (2) 1 1,615 1 I I I I ! 7307 WHEELS, TIRES FOR BOAT TRAILER 1 188 1 ! I I 1 I 7315 HOSES AND NOZZLES I I 1 1 3,200 1 3,200 1 3,200 1 Sub -total 4,766 3,200 3,200 3,200 • Total expenditures ----------- 6,481 ----------- 258 ---------------------- 516 9,000 ----------- 9,000 ----------- ----------- 9,000 • 657 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEx-1_02 Page 56 01 45-18 FIRE PROTECTION -POINT CON Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------ + +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 828 1 1 1 700 1 700 1 900 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES I I 1 1 300 1 300 1 400 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES I I 1 1 789 1 789 1 1,500 1 Sub -total 828 1,789 1,789 2,800 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I 1 I 1 1 750 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 I 1 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 4,745 1 329 1 659 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I 1 1 800 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 732 5,477 1 32 1 361 64 1 723 850 1 3,050 850 1 3,050 850 1 4,600 • Sub -total 7308 HOSES, SCOTT AIR BOTTLES I 1 I I 1 1 1,750 1 7309 BREATHING APPARATUS I I I 1 1 1 2,150 1 Sub -total 3,900 Total expenditures ----------- 6,305 ----------- 361 ---------------------- 723 4,939 ----------- 4,839 ---------------------- 11,300 - 0 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtota Ls BURVEX.1.02 Page 57 01 45-19 FIRE PROTECTION-SEADRIFT Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91......+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Gla Description • ____ ______________________________ Year Ending 72/31/90 Th 1991 06/30/1997 Annualized -Protected Actual Actual Budget Tot Budget Tot _— P=Budged Budget Final — Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 356 1 235 1 469 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES 1 I I 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 — 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES 1 329 ! 5,503 1 11,005 1 6,200 1 6,200 1 6,200 1 Sub -total 685 5,738 11,474 7,000 7,000 7,000 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS ! 1,254 1 428 1 856 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I ! I I 1 1 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 1,002 1 64 1 128 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 Sub -total 2,256 492 984 3,000 3,000 3,000 7310 PUMP 1 618 ! 1 1 1 1 1 Sub-toteL 618 Total expenditures ----------- 3,559 ----------- 6,230 ---------------------- 12,458 10,000 ----------- 10,000 ----------- 10,000 ----------- I • 659 Run date: 08/23/91 D 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 — Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 58 01 45-20 FIRE PROTECTION -PORT O-CO Actual for YTO Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 354 1 142 1 284 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES 1 177 1 1 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES 1 277 1 1 1 450 1 350 1 350 1 _ Subtotal 808 142 284 1,450 1,350 1,350 "- 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I I I I 1 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I 1 1 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 1,230 1 572 1 1,144 1 1,330 1 1,330 1 1,330 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I I 1 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 1,989 1 96 1 192 1 1,985 1 1,985 1 1,985 1 Sub -total 3,219 668 1,336 3,815 3,815 3,815 7311 NOSE 1 I I 1 1 1 1 • 7312 BUNKER GEAR 1 3,742 1 1 1 1 1 ! Sub -total 3,742 Total expenditures 7,769 810 .1, 620 5,265 5,165 5,165 Ll Im Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 59 01 45-21 FIRE PROTECTION-A.I.M. BE Actual for YTD Actual. -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +•Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 216 1 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES ! I 1 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES ! 17 ! 1 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 Sub -total 233 1,200 1,200 1,200 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS ! 1 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I I 1 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 372 1 54 1 108 1 550 1 550 1 550 1 Sub -total 372 54 108 1,150 1,150 1,150 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT ! I 1 I I 1 3,800 1 7312 BUNKER GEAR I ! I I I 1 I 7313 AIR PACKS (2) I ! I 1 I I 1 Sub -total 3,800 Total expenditures ----------- 605 ----------- 54 ----------- ----------- 108 2,350 ----------- 2,350 ----------- 6,150 ----------- Is 11 661 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.L02 Page 60 O1 45-30 CONSTABLES -GENERAL Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5601 LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPLIES 1 300 1 1 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 Sub -total 300 300 300 300 6331 MAGNOLIA BEACH AREA PATROL I I 1 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 200 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I 1 I I 1 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 787 1 389 1 779 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 1,000 1 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 45 1 125 1 250 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 74 1 142 1 284 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 Sub -total 906 656 1,313 3,900 3,900 1,900 Total expenditures ----------- 1,206 ----------- 656 ---------------------- 1,313 4,200 ----------- 4,200 ----------- ........... 2,200 • • Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 61 01 45-31 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT #1 Actual for Year Ending YID Actual Thru * ------- For Year Annualized Ending 12,31/91------♦ Projected This year ♦-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-♦ Final • Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget _ Budget Budget 2223 Created by posting ! ! ! I I I I Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL ! 5,255 1 2,627 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,413 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 402 1 201 1 402 1 404 1 404 1 415 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE ! I I I I 1 I 4930 RETIREMENT ! 391 1 193 1 386 1 396 1 396 1 408 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 248 1 303 1 606 1 303 1 303 1 344 1 4950 Created by posting I I ! I I I I Sub -total 6,296 3,324 6,649 6,358 6,358 6,580 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 3,000 1 1,587 1 3,173 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 I 1 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 Sub -tots! 3,000 1,587 3,173 3,178 3,178 3,178 7602 RADIO EQUIPMENT 1 1 1,250 1 2,500 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 1 • Sub -total 1,250 2,500 1,250 1,250 Total expenditures ----------- 9,296 ----------- 6,161 ----------- ----------- 12,322 10,786 ----------- 10,786 ----------- 9,758 ----------- 663 • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 r .. Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 62 01 45-32 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT p2 Actual for YTD Actual ------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Me Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 2223 Created by posting I I I I I 1 Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 5,255 1 2,627 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,413 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 402 1 201 1 402 1 404 1 404 1 415 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 391 1 193 1 386 I 395 1 395 1 408 1 4940 WORKMEN-S COMPENSATION 1 248 1 303 1 606 1 303 1 303 1 344 1 4950 Created by posting I I 1 I I 1 I Sub -total 6,296 3,324 6,649 6,357 6,357 6,580 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 1,911 1 802 1 1,605 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS I 1 1 I. 178 1 178 1 178 1 • Sub -total 1,911 802 1,605 3,178 3,178 3,178 7602 RADIO EQUIPMENT 1 I 1,231 1 2,462 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 1 Sub -total 1,231 2,462 1,250 1,250 Total expenditures ........... 8,207 ----------- 5,357 ---------------------- 10,716 10,785 ----------- 10,785 ----------' 9,758 ____...__-- is Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Horksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 Page 63 01 45-33 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT p3 Actual for YTD Actual *-------For Year Ending 12/31/91----.-* •-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 2223 Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL ! 5,255 ! 2,627 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,413 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 402 1 201 1 402 1 404 1 404 1 415 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE ! ! 1 I I I I 4930 RETIREMENT ! 391 1 193 1 386 1 395 1 395 1 408 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 248 ! 303 1 606 1 303 1 303 1 344 1 4950 Created by posting I I I I I I ! Sub -total 6,296 3,324 6,649 6,357 6,357 6,580 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 1,595 ! 535 1 1,071 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS I I 1 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 Sub -total 1,595 535 1,071 3,178 3,178 3,178 7602 RADIO EQUIPMENT ! ! 1,250 1 2,500 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 1 Subtotal 1,250 2,500 1,250 1,250 •----------- ----------- ------------------------------------------------------- Total expenditures 7,891 5,109 10,220 10,785 10,785 9,758 0 665 I Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 -Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 64 01 45-34 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT g4 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 2223 Created by posting 1 I I 1 1 I I Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 5,255 1 2,627 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,413 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 402 1 201 1 402 1 404 1 404 1 415 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I I 1 I I I I 4930 RETIREMENT 1 391 1 193 1 386 1 395 1 395 1 408 1 ^4940 NORYMEN-S COMPENSATION 1 248 1 304 1 608 1 304 1 304 1 344 1 4950 Created by posting I I 1 1 I I I Sub -total 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 6,296 1 2,877 1 3,325 971 1 6,651 1,942 1 6,358 3,000 6,358 1 3,000 6,580 1 3,000 • 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS i I I 1 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 Sub -total 2,877 971 1,942 3,178 3,178 3,178 7602 RADIO EOUIPMENT 1 1 1,231 1 2,462 1 1,250 1 1,250 1 1 _ Sub -total 1,231 2,462 1,250 1,250 Total expenditures ______ 9,173 ___________ 5,527 ___________ ___________ 11,055 10,786 ___________ 10,786 ___________ ___________ 9,758 0 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending i 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEN.1.02 Page 65 01 45-35 CONSTABLE -PRECINCT #5 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91......+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ -" Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final LGIs Description--__--_=--t_-----__ -_12/31/90- 06/30/1991 tttLLActual Actual cTot Budget t-= _Budget tt _Budget 2222 Created by posting I ! I 1 I I ! 2223 Created by posting ! I 1 1 1 ! ! Sub -total ! 4101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 5,255 ! 2,348 1 4,696 1 5,255 1 5,255 1 5,413 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 402 1 180 1 359 ! - 405 1 405 1 415 1 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE ! 1 I I I I I 4930 RETIREMENT 1 391 1 173 1 346 1 395 1 395 1 408 1 4940 WORKMEN-S COMPENSATION 1 248 1 304 1 608 1 304 1 304 1 344 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT I 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 i - Sub -total 6,296 3,004 6,008 6,359 6,359 6,580 63I0 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 1 978 1 1,955 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 1 50 1 100 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 Sub -total 1,028 2,055 3,178 3,178 3,178 •7602 RADIO EQUIPMENT Sub -total 1 1 1,231 1 1,231 2,462 1 2,462 1,250 1 1,250 1,250 1 1,250 1 Total expenditures ___________ 6,296 ___________ 5,263 ___________ ___________ 10,525 10,787 ___________ 10,787 ___________ ___________ 9,758 0 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 •- :un date: 01/01/80 a 06:31 ',us date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1_02 Page 1 O1 45-40 SHERIFF Actual for YTD Actual +-------for Year Ending 12/31/91------. .-Year Ending 12/31/92-* Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gin Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget ,101 ELECTED OFFICIAL 1 34,170 1 17,085 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 34,170 1 35,195 1 4301 CHIEF 1 26,670 1 14,535 1 29,070 1 29,070 1 29,070 1 29,942 1 r i302 INVESTIGATORS 1 25,204 I 26,688 I 53,377 1 50,408 I 50,408 I 51,920 I 4303 LAW ENFORCEMENT DEPUTIES 1 285,080 1 110,749 1 221,497 1 221,049 1 224,676 1 227,682 1 4304 DISPATCHERS 1 91,587 1 48,986 1 97,972 1 93,285 1 93,285 1 96,085 1 4311 SERGEANTS 1 1 25,494 1 50,987 1 50,408 1 50,408 1 51,920 1 4404 SECRETARY 1 20,263 1 10,248 1 20,496 1 20,263 1 20,263 1 20,871 1 4701 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 1 917 1 458 1 917 1 1,834 1 1,834 1 1,834 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 1,240 1 803 1 1,606 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 37,115 1 19,140 1 38,280 1 38,475 1 38,475 1 39,570 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE ! 100,058 1 46,229 1 92,458 1 120,000 1 98,732 1 123,357 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 35,888 1 18,628 1 37,256 1 37,498 1 37,498 1 38,624 1 • 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 18,352 1 22,153 1 44,306 1 22,792 1 22,792 1 25,823 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 1,347 1 452 1 904 1 1,405 1 1,405 1 1,447 1 Subtotal 677,891 361,648 723,296 722,457 704,816 746,070 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 5,680 1 2,784 1 5,567 1 4,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1 I I I I I 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I 1,309 1 1,751 1 3,502 1 2,600 1 2,600 1 2,600 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES I 60 1 153 1 306 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 5220 MACHINERY PARTSISUPPLIES 1 1,133 1 2,033 1 4,065 1 2,000 1 5,000 1 4,000 1 - 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 31,405 1 14,733 1 29,466 1 28,500 1 32,500 1 32,500 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES 1 2,984 1 631 1 1,262 1 2,800 ! 2,800 1 2,800 ! 1 25 1 1 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 - 5310 DUES 5601 LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPLIES 1 4,279 1 4,678 1 9,357 1 5,894 1 7,394 1 5,894 1 Sub -total 46,875 26,763 53,525 46,024 55,524 53,024 M lun date: 01/01/80 Q 06:31 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Ius date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With SubtotAts BURVE%.LO2 Page 2 01 45-40 SHERIFF Actual for YTD Actual +- ------ For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ .-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual .....=8,500 =====16,534 Actual Tot Budget Budget .....10.000 Budget • $210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1======9,516 I ...._=8.267 1 I I 8,500 I I 6221 POSTAGE 1 1,815 1 655 1 1,310 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 2,000 S310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY I 1 I I I I ! 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 1 37 1 75 1 750 1 750 1 750 ! S332 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENTS -DEPUTIES 1 770 1 1,053 1 2,106 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 5,377 1 4,954 1 9,908 1 5,000 1 9,000 1 7,000 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I I I I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 2,139 1 1 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS I I 1 1 2,500 1 1 2,500 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 1 10,481 1 11,632 1 23,265 1 11,541 1 24,041 1 11,500 1 6531 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE I I I I I I I 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 4,280 1 1,337 1 2,675 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS 1 I 1 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 6611 INSURANCE -SHERIFF DEPT-HONESTY 1 860 1 1 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 • 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 5,238 1 949 1 1,898 1 46,248 1 5,150 27,500 1 5,150 1 27,500 1 5,150 ! 1 27,500 1 6641 INSURANCE -LAW ENFORCEMT LIAR. 1 19,816 1 23,124 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTERS 1 45 1 51 1 102 1 70 1 70 1 70 1 6680 INSURANCE -NOTARY BONDS ! 71 1 1 1 108 1 108 1 108 1 6930 PHYSICALS 1 456 1 377 1 753 1 400 1 1,004 1 1,000 1 6940 UNIFORMS 1 3,014 1 1,500 1 3,000 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 694 1 722 1 1,445 1 972 1 972 1 972 1 Sub -total 64,572 54,658 109,319 73,419 88,023 77,978 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1 509 1 1 1 1 1 I 7201 VEHICLES (5) ! 44,330 1 1 1 1 1 33,000 ! 0 !un date: 01/01/80 a 06:31 ws date: 09/10/1991 01 45-40 SHERIFF Actual for Year Ending Gla Description 12/31/90 1401 CAMERA EQUIPMENT I 7605 RADIO CONSOLE 1 iub-total 44,839 Total expenditures --- 834,177 Calhoun County Auditors Office fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVER.L02 Page 3 YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- .-Year Ending 12/31/92-- Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 805 1 1,611 1 806 1 806 1 806 1 1 1 1 1 32,000 1 1 805 1,611 806 32,806 33,806 ___________ ------- _--- ___________---- _______ 443,874 887,751 842,706 881,169 910,878 •. • • 670 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals - BURVEK.1.02 Page 69 11 45-45 SHERIFF NARCOTICS Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Tear Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 2234 Created by Posting Subtotal I I I ! ! I ! 4302 INVESTIGATORS ! 69,201 ! 31,628 ! 63,257 ! 75,612 ! 75,612 1 77,880 I 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 5,294 1 2,371 I 4,743 1 5,791 1 5,791 1 5,958 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 18,186 1 5,874 1 11,748 1 17,623 1'. 17,623 1 17,623 1 i 4930 RETIREMENT ! 5,142 ! 2,322 1 4,643 ! 5,687 ! 5,687 1 5,857 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 3,288 ! 4,062 1 8,124 I 4,364 I 4,364 1 4,945 ! 1 I 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 207 1 60 1 120 1 227 1 227 1 234 1 Sub -total 101,318 46,317 92,635 109,304 109,304 112,497 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 329 1 89 ! 179 1 800 ! 800 1 800 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES ! I I I ! I I I 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 271 1 1 ! 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 Subtotal 600 89 179 2,300 2,300 2,300 6193 TASK FORCE GRANT MATCH I I 1 1 19,000 1 1 19,000 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES ! 4,009 1 1,252 1 2,504 I 2,000 ! - 2,000 1 2,000 1 • 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I ! 1 I I I 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY ! 1,740 ! 2,156 ! 4,313 ! 2,500 ! 2,500 1 3,500 ! 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES ! ! I I I 1 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS I ! I I ! I I 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 1 1,125 ! 701 1 1,402 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 35 1 1 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 1,502 1 -638 1 -1,276 1 1,350 ! 1,350 1 1,350 1 6930 PHYSICALS ! I I 1 80 ! 201 1 202 ! 6999 MISCELLANEOUS ! 7,500 1 6,000 1 12,000 1 10,000 ! 10,000 1 10,000 1 Sub -total 15,902 9,471 18,943 37,330 18,451 38,452 Total expenditures ----------- 117,820 ----------- 55,877 ---------------------- 171,757 148,934 ----------- 130,055 ----------- 153,249 '---------- • 671 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budge[ Uorkshee[ With Subtotals year to period ending 06/30/19 BURVE%.L 7002 ' Page 70 01 45-50 ADULT PROBATION Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending12/31/91------- Gla Description Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year a -Year Ending Proposed 12/31F92al Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6102 CONTRACT EXPENSE -ADULT PROBAT. 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 8,000 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 4,000 6149 DRUG TESTING I I I I 1 I 1,500 1 - 6460 TRAINING SCHOOLS -ADULT PROBAT. 1 1,648 1 840 1 1,680 1 1,440 1 1,920 I 2,400 I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I I I I I I -6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 I 45 I 1 91 1 99 1 46 I 100 I Sub -total 5,648 4,685 9,771 5,539 5,966 8,000 7314 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 1 469 1 270 1 540 1 461 1 270 1 1 Sub -total 469 270 540 461 270 Total expenditures ----------- 6,117 ----------- ------- 5,155 --- ------- 10,311 --- 6,000 ----------- 6,236 --------- --------- 8,000 • • 672 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.LO2 Page 71 01 45-55 JUVENILE PROBATION Actual for YTD Actual *-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Gla Description___________________ 12/31/90_ 06/30/1991 Actual _Actual Tot Budget _Budget Budget 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES ! 2,239 1 566 1 1,133 1 2,700 1 2,700 1 2,700 1 Subtotal 2,239 566 1,133 2,700 2,700 2,700 6103 CONTRACT EXPENSE -JUVENILE PROB ! 31,989 ! 26,668 ! 53,335 1 36,831 1 37,454 1 50,090 1 6560 COPIER RENTALS I 1 ! I ! I I Sub -total 31,989 26,668 53,335 36,831 37,454 50,090 Total expenditures ----------- 34,228 ----------- 27,234 ----------- ----------- 54,468 39,531 ----------- 40,154 ........... 52,790 ........... • • 673 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 -Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 72 01 45.60 HIGHWAY PATROL Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Die Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 7,145 1 3,680 1 7,360 1 10,000 ! 10,000 1 13,000 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 547 1 282 1 563 1 767 1 767 1 995 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 35 1 31 1 61 1 40 ! 40 1 58 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 21 1 7 1 14 1 30 1 30 ! 39 1 'Sub -total 7,748 4,000 7,998 10,837 10,837 14,092 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 132 1 486 1 972 1 350 1 760 1 760 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I I 1 1 410 1 1 1 Sub -total 132 486 972 760 760 760 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES I I 1 1 250 ! 761 ! 1,200 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 468 1 1 1 511 ! 1 1 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 52 1 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 Sub -total 520 1,361 1,361 1,800 Total expenditures ----------- 8,400 ----------- 4,486 --------------- 8,970 - ------ 12,958 ----------- 12,958 ----------- ----------- 16,652 •. • C 674 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 73 • 01 45-65 BUILDING INSPECTION Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ - Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIAL ! 12,734 1 6,367 1 12,734 1 12,734 1 12,734 1 1,000 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 974 ! 573 1 1,147 1 1,161 1 1,161 1 261 1 .: 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I 2,942 ! 622 1 1,244 1 2,938 1 2,851 1 190 1 4930 RETIREMENT ! 946 1 508 ! 1,017 1 958 1 958 1 76 1 - 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 1,544 ! 1,889 1 3,778 1 1,889 1 1,889 1 163 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT ! 38 ! 13 1 26 1 39 1 39 1 3 1 ` Sub -total 19,178 9,972 19,946 19,719 19,632 1,693 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ! 400 ! 209 1 418 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES I I I I 1 I 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 1 49 ! 15 1 29 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 5310 DUES 1 65 1 25 1 50 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 Sub -total 514 249 497 1,000 1,000 1,000 •6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 6221 POSTAGE ! 594 I I 200 1 360 1 72 1 720 1 144 1 600 1 300 1 600 300 1 600 1 1 300 1 6305 AUTO ALLOWANCES I 2,400 ! 1,200 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 2,400 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY I I I I I 1 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY ! 251 1 404 1 809 ! 500 1 500 1 750 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY ! I I I 1 1 500 1 645D TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 317 ! 1 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 y 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 145 1 1 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 f f 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE ! I 1 1 150 1 150 1 300 1 Subtotal 3,907 2,036 4,073 4,550 4,550 5,450 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT ! 1,087 1 1 1 1 1 1 Subtotal 1,087 Total expenditures 24,686 12,257 24,516 25,269 25,182 8,143 • 675 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 • Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 --Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.LO2 Page 74 01 55-05 AMBULANCE OPERATION-GENER Actual for YTD Actual * ------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------* +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ _ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final j Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget -_ 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 5,278 1 326 1 652 1 8,100 ! 8,100 1 8,100 1 6655 INSURANCE -MALPRACTICE 1 3,260 1 1 1 4,500 1 4,500 1 4,500 1 - 6686 INSURANCE -VOLUNTEER EMS COMP. I I I I I I ! Sub -total 8,538 326 652 12,600 12,600 12,600 7319 DIFIBRILLATOR ! I 1 ! ! I 17,000 1 Sub -total 17,000 Total expenditures ----------- 8,538 ----------- 326 ---------------------' 652 12,600 ----.------ 12,600 ----------- ----------- 29,600 • 676 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 75 01 55-06 AMBULANCE-OLIVIA/PORT ALT Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------t *-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Gla Description------------- ----- --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 --- -Actual ---= Actual Tot Budget c-_ _Budget -- -Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 175 1 50 1 100 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES ! 538 ! 1 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 _ Sub -total 713 50 100 1,000 1,000 1,000 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES ! 409 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 '— 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS ! 1 I 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 1 I I I I 1 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE E EQUIPMENT 1 1 I I I I I Sub -total 409 2,000 2,000 2,000 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT ! 635 1 I 1 1 1 1 Sub -total 635 Total expenditures ----------- 1,757 ----------- 50 ---------------------- 100 3,000 ----------- 3,000 ----------- 3,000 ........... 11 677 • Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 I- Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVER.1_02 Page 76 01 55-07 AMBULANCE -POINT COMFORT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 83 1 1 1 20G 1 200 1 200 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES 1 1 285 1 571 1 400 1 400 1 400 1 — Sub -total 83 285 571 600 600 600 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I 1 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 —6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 293 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 800 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I I 1 300 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT I I I I I I 1 i Sub -total 293 1,500 1,500 1,600 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT I 1 I I I 1 I Subtotal • Total expenditures ------•---- 376 ----------• 285 ---------------------- 571 2,100 ----------- 2,100 -------•--- ........... 2,200 678 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 55-08 AMBULANCE-SEADRIFT • GIB Description___________________ 522D MACHINERY-PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES ! Sub -total 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES ! 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS ! 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT ! Subtotal 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT ! Sub -total Total expenditures ,r u C� Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 77 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- ♦-Year Ending 12/31/92-t Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 92 1 42 1 85 1 407 1 407 1 407 1 13 1 89 1 179 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 105 131 264 757 757 757 859 1 1 1 523 1 523 I 523 1 53 1 58 1 115 1 570 1 570 1 570 1 ! I I 1 I I I 1 ! I I 1 912 58 115 1,093 1,093 1,093 145 1 1 1 I I I 145 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,162 189 379 1,850 1,850 1,850 - 679 • Run date: 08/23/91 Q 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 _-Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotats SURVEX.L02 Page 78 01 55-09 AMBULANCE -PORT O'CONNOR Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1_5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 238 1 170 1 340 1 250 1 199 1 250 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES I 350 I 760 I 1,520 I 350 I 781 1 350 1 — Sub -total 568 930 1,860 600 980 600 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I 1 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 -- 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 428 1 221 1 441 1 1,330 1 950 1 1,330 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 1 I I I I I I 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 6 EQUIPMENT I I I I 1 I I Subtotal 428 221 441 1,630 1,250 1,630 7202 AMBULANCE 1 1 58,500 1 117,000 1 58,500 1 58,500 1 1 7602 RADIO EQUIPMENT I I I 1 ! I I Sub -total 58,500 117,000 58,500 58,500 • Total expenditures ----------- 1,016 ---------- 59,651 ---------------------- 119,301 60,730 ----------- 60,730 -------- -------------- 2,230 0 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 79 01 55-10 AMBULANCE-A.I.M. BEACHES Actual for YTO Actual -------.For Year Ending 12/31/91--_-__+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ • Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description ____ ______________________________ 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 ! 1 1 250 1 250 1 250 1 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES ! ! 1 1 400 1 400 1 2,400 1 Subtotal 650 650 2,650 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES 1 235 1 1 ! 400 1 400 1 400 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS ! ! I 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I '1 I I I 1 I 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Sub -total 235 1,400 1,400 1,400 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT ! ! I I I I I Sub-total Total expenditures ----------- 235 ----------- ---------------------- 2,050 ----------- 2,050 ----------- 4,050 ----------- • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 Page 80 • 01 55-15 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annuatized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6128 CONTRIBUTION TO EXPENSE 1 200,000 1 100,000 1 200,000 1 200,000 1 200,000 1 225,928 1 Sub -total 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 225,928 Total expenditures ----------- 200,000 ----------- 100,000 ----------- ----------- 200,000 200,000 ----------- 200,000 ----------- 225,928 ----------- • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 81 01 55-20 MOSQUITO CONTROL Actual for YTO Actual *-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ • Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5430 INSECTICIDES/PESTICIDES 1 31,332 1 11,642 1 23,283 1 31,332 1 31,332 1 31,332 1 sub -total 31,332 11,642 23,283 31,332 31,332 31,332 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 45 1 1 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 Sub -total 45 65 65 65 - Total expenditures ----------- 31,377 ----------- 11,642 ---"'---------------- 23,283 31,397 ----------- 31,397 ----------- ----------- 31,397 • 0 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 55-25 HEALTH DEPARTMENT Gle Description 4210 NURSE 4211 INSPECTOR 4212 LVN 4213 SANITARIAN 4214 CHIEF INSPECTOR 4404 SECRETARY 4405 CLERK 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 4930 RETIREMENT 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT Sub -total 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES 5430 INSECTICIDES/PESTICIDES 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES 5560 MEDICAL/OTHER SUPPLIES 5561 CLINIC DRUGS Sub -total 6157 PATHOLOGIST FEES 6187 TITLE XX FAMILY PLANNING Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 82 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 27,364 1 13,682 1 27,364 1 27,364 1 27,364 1 28,185 1 1 21,614 1 8,718 1 17,437 1 18,337 1 18,337 1 18,887 1 1 18,554 1 10,426 1 20,851 1 22,000 1 22,000 1 22,660 1 1 12,151 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11,936 1 23,871 1 25,000 1 25,000 1 25,750 1 1 1 7,935 1 15,870 1 18,657 1 18,657 1 19,217 1 1 10,296 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 20 l 1 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 1 6,885 1 4,133 1 8,267 1 9,001 1 9,001 1 9,243 1 - 1 21,997 1 11,127 1 22,253 1 29,371 1 29,371 1 29,371 1 1 6,686 1 3,868 1 7,736 1 8,348 1 8,348 1 8,626 I 1 3,356 1 8,262 1 16,523 1 7,485 1 8,262 1 8,480 1 1 270 1 100 1 200 1 322 1 322 1 348 1 129.193 80.187 160,372 167,085 167,862 171,967 1 1,797 1 I 1 635 1 I 1,269 1 I 2,300 1 I 2,300 1 I 2,300 1 I I I 1 107 1 I -64 1 I -128 1 I 450 1 I 450 1 I 450 1 1 375 1 164 1 328 1 380 1 380 1 380 1 1 252 1 48 1 96 1 330 1 330 1 330 1 1 105 1 750 1 1,500 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 2,636 1,533 3,065 4,210 4,210 4,210 I 85 1 130 1 260 1 250 1 250 1 500 1 1 3,400 1 1 1 3,400 1 3,400 1 3,400 1 • • m Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 • Bus defer 08/23/1997 01 55-25 HEALTH DEPARTMENT Gla Description 6188 V.D. INVESTIGATOR FRINGE ! 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES I 6221 POSTAGE I 6305 AUTO ALLOWANCES 1 6311 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY -INSPECTOR ! 6313 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY -NURSE IV I 6314 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY-V.D.INVESTIG. ! 6315 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY -SECRETARY ! 6316 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY-LVN I 6317 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY-D I RECTOR 1 6318 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY -INSPECTOR I 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I • 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTER 1 6680 INSURANCE -NOTARY BONDS I 6930 PHYSICALS ! 6945 WATER QUALITY MONITORING I 6946 DIRECT NURSING CARE ! Sub -total 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT Sub -total Total expenditures 0 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.L02 Page 83 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 880 1 440 1 880 1 880 1 880 1 880 1 3,538 1 1,231 1 2,462 1 3,450 1 3,450 1 4,500 1 377 1 302 1 604 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 4,920 1 2,460 1 4,920 1 4,920 1 4,920 1 4,920 1 ! I I I I 1 600 1 300 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 720 1 360 1 720 1 720 1 720 1 720 1 227 1 16 1 31 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 I 1 I 1 1 300 1 842 1 406 1 811 1 2,400 I 2,400 1 2,400 I 1,102 1 1 1 3,420 1 3,420 1 3,400 1 265 1 104 1 208 1 1,300 1 1,300 1 1,300 1 I I I 1 1 500 1 231 1 1 1 250 1 250 1 1,000 1 204 1 407 1 814 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1 16 1 33 1 17 1 17 1 25 1 ! I 1 80 1 80 I 80 1 50 ! I 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 I 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 3,973 1 1,087 1 2,173 1 4,950 1 4,950 1 4,950 1 21,414 I 7,259 I 14,516 I 29,687 29,687 I 32,525 I I ----------- 153,243 ----------- 88,979 ---------------------- 177,953 200,982 ----------- 201,759 ----------- 208,702 ----------- Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 —Bus date: 08/23/1991 Oi 55-30 INDIGENT HEALTHCARE GIs Description _ 6104 CARE OF INDIGENTS 6105 CARE OF INDIGENTS -RESERVE --Sub-total 7333 A/C OVERHAUL 7350 PORTABLE X-RAY MACHINE 7351 HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT Sub -total .--Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.LG2 Page 84 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual, Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 228,640 1 213,212 1 426,425 1 350,000 1 350,000 1 350,000 1 1 1 1 1 200,000 1 200,000 1 200,000 ! 228,640 213,212 426,425 550,000 550,000 550,000 I I 1 1 1 12,500 1 1 1 1 234,167 1 1 1 246,667 ---------------- - --------------------------- 475,307 213,212 426,425 550,000 ------------------'-- ----------- 550,000 550,000 •. • • Fix4bTQ Q Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 85 • 01 55-35 MENTAL HEALTH Actual for Year Ending YTD Actual Thru -------- For Year Annualized Ending 12/31/91------+ Projected This year +-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-+ Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6106 CARE OF INDIGENTS -GULF BEND ! 3,036 1 3,036 1 6,072 1 3,036 1 3,036 1 3,036 1 6107 CARE OF INDIGENTS -CHILD STUDY 1 1 ! 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 Sub -total 3,036 3,036 6,072 4,536 4,536 4,536 Total expenditures ----------- 3,036 ----------- 3,036 ---------------------- 6,072 4,536 ----------- 4,536 ----------- ----------- 4,536 is 0 as Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 86 01 60-05 LIBRARY Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 2231 Created by posting I 1 -100 1 -200 1 -200 1 1 I Sub -total -100 -200 -200 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIAL 1 23,330 1 6,805 1 13,609 1 23,330 1 23,330 1 24,030 1 4402 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS 1 21,342 1 10,671 1 21,342 1 21,342 1 21,342 1 21,950 1 4405 CLERK 1 14,394 1 6,880 1 13,760 1 14,394 1 14,394 1 14,826 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 22,705 1 11,734 1 23,467 1 24,440 1 24,440 I 24,440 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 6,358 1 2,748 1 5,496 1 6,401 1 6,401 1 6,522 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 7,003 1 3,493 1 6,985 1 17,623 1 17,623 1 17,623 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 4,361 1 1,748 1 3,496 1 4,361 ! 4,361 ! 4,492 I 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 368 1 456 1 913 1 456 1 492 1 512 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 249 1 69 1 137 1 251 1 251 1 256 1 Sub -total 100,110 44,604 89,205 112,598 112,634 114,651 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 1,672 1 737 1 1,475 1 1,700 ! 1,700 1 1,700 ! 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES I I I I 1 1 50 1 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES ! 1 17 1 35 1 50 1 50 ! 240 ! 5310 DUES 1 120 1 1 1 120 1 120 1 120 1 5320 PUBLICATIONS 1 3,865 1 941 1 1,881 1 3,750 1 3,750 1 3,750 1 Subtotal 5,657 1,695 3,391 5,620 5,620 5,860 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,397 1 968 1 1,937 1 2,600 1 2,600 1 3,200 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 176 1 55 1 109 1 800 1 800 1 800 1 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 1,094 1 396 1 792 1 875 1 875 1 1,200 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I ! 1 I ! I 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 235 1 383 1 765 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I I I .I • 0 Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 • Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 87 01 60-05 LIBRARY Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-+ - Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 189 1 228 1 455 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 6610 INSURANCE -SURETY BONDS I I 1 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 - 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTERS 1 23 1 26 1 53 1 30 I 30 1 30 1 6941 BOOK REPAIRS AND BINDING I 1 1 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 —' 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 28 1 15 1 30 1 200 1 200 1 200 1 Subtotal 3,142 2,071 4,141 5,983 5,983 6,908 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT I I I 1 1 1 2,000 1 7403 SHELVING 1 599 1 1 1 1 I I 7501 LIBRARY BOOKS 1 19,493 1 8,040 1 16,080 1 12,000 1 12,000 1 20,000 1 7902 BUILDING-SEADRIFT I I I I I I I Sub -total 20,092 8,040 16,080 12,000 12,000 22,000 • Total expenditures .--.------I 129,001 ----------- 56,310 ----------- ----------- 112,617 136,001 ----------- 136,237 ---------------------- 149,419 0 mi Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 88 01 60.10 MUSEUM Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIAL 1 2,953 1 1,481 1 2,963 1 3,113 1 3,113 1 3,206 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 226 1 113 1 227 1 241 1 241 1 245 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I 1 I I ! ! ! 4930 RETIREMENT I 1 I I I 1 I 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 11 1 14 1 29 1 15 1 15 1 17 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 9 1 3 1 6 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 Sub -total 3,199 1,611 3,225 3,379 3,379 3,478 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 50 1 1 I 50 ! 50 ! 100 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 45 1 1 I 100 1 100 1 100 1 Sub -total 95 150 150 200 6210 TELEPHONE 1 I I I I 1 400 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 393 1 251 1 501 1 450 1 450 1 450 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY ! I I I I ! ! _ 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I 1 I I ! I ! 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS 1 1 I I I 200 ! 1 6942 LAMINATING SERVICES I 1 1 I ! ! ! 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 1 457 1 1 1 400 1 93 1 400 1 Sub -total 850 - 251 501 850 743 1,250 7520 FURNITURE I 306 ! 1 I ! 1 1 7521 MINI BLINDS I 1 1 I I 307 1 1 Sub -total 306 307 Total expenditures expenditures ----------- 4,450 ----------- 1,862 ----------- ----------- 3,726 4,379 ----------- 4,579 ----------- 4,928 ----- • • C • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 60-15 HISTORICAL COMMISSION Gla Description 5504 FLAGS ! Sub -total 6128 CONTRIBUTION TO EXPENSE 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES ! 6760 LIGHTHOUSE MAINTENANCE 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS ! Sub -total Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 89 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1,800 1 ! 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 940 1 1 1 1,085 1 1,085 1 1,085 1 150 1 251 1 501 1 450 1 450 1 450 1 I I I ! 1 I ! I I I I I 457 1 1 1 3,000 1 2,800 1 1,500 1 446 1 1 1 600 1 600 1 600 1 1,993 251 501 5,135 4,935 3,635 ................................. ........... ........... ........... ........... 3,793 251 501 6,935 6,735 5,435 691 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 • Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BLRVEX.L02 Page 90 01 60-20 PARKS AND RECREATION Actual for YTD Actual -------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ i-Year Ending 12%31/92- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 L 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5501 BUILDING SUPPLIES/PARTS 1 2,886 1 2,145 1 4,290 1 2,500 1 2,900 1 3,000 1 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES 1 I 1 1 I ill I I Sub -total 2,686 2,145 4,290 2,500 3,011 3,000 . 6189 TRASH COLL.-PUBLIC BEACHES 1 4,740 1 1,975 1 3,950 1 4,800 1 4,800 1 4,800 1 6705 UTILITIES 1 1,754 1 1,070 1 2,140 1 3,450 1 3,450 1 3,450 1 6742 GARBAGE COLL.-MAGNOLIA BEACH 1 7,200 1 3,009 1 6,018 1 7,500 1 7,500 1 7,500 1 6743 GARBAGE COLLECTION-PT.O-CONNOR 1 152 1 266 1 532 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 500 1 6744 GARBAGE COLLECTION-SEADRIFT 1 95 1 197 1 394 1 525 1 525 1 525 1 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS 1 163 1 114 1 228 1 1,500 1 989 1 1,500 1 Subtotal 14,104 6,631 13,262 18,775 18,264 18,275 7811 BEACH IMPROVEMENTS -SIX MILE 1 -PRECINCT P3 1,000 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 500 1 500 1 • 7812 BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 1 7813 BOAT RAMP IMPROV.-PT.O'CONNORN I 1 I I I I 500 1 Subtotal 1,000 1,500 Total expenditures ----------- 17,990 ----------- 8,776 ---------------------- 17,552 21,275 ----------- 21,275 ----------- 22,775 ----------- • 692 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 91 01 65-05 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATI Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +•Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized is year Proposed • Gla Description ____ ______________________________ 12/31/90 06/30/1991 =06/30/1991 --Projected Actual Actual -TTh Tot Budget Budget _— ====Budget Budget 6128 CONTRIBUTION TO EXPENSE 1 6,500 1 6,500 1 13,000 1 6,500 1 6,500 1 7,000 1 Sub -total 6,500 6,500 13,000 6,500 6,500 7,000 Total expenditures ----------- 6,500 ----------- 6,500 ---------------------- 13,000 6,500 ----------- 6,500 ---------------------- 7,000 i • 6J3 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 92 01 70-05 VETERANS SERVICE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIAL 1 6,227 1 3,113 1 6,227 1 6,227 1 6,227 1 6,414 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 476 1 231 1 461 1 479 1 479 1 491 1 - 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I I I I I 1 1 4930 RETIREMENT I I I I 1 I I 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 20 1 25 1 50 1 25 I 25 1 29 ! 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 19 1 6 1 12 1 19 1 19 1 20 1 Sub -total 6,742 3,375 6,750 6,750 6,750 6,954 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 41 1 69 1 139 1 150 1 150 1 150 1 Sub -total 41 69 139 150 150 150 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 163 1 91 1 182 1 350 1 350 1 350 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 125 1 58 1 116 1 100 1 100 1 100 I • 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 290 1 1 1 500 1 500 1 500 ! 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I 1 1 I I I I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I I I I ! I I Sub -total 578 149 298 950 950 950 Total expenditures ----------- 7,361 ----------- 3,593 ---------------------- 7,187 7,850 ----------- 7,850 ---------------------- 8,054 • 694 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1,02 Page 93 • 01 70-10 INDIGENT EXPENSE-AUTOPSIE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6157 PATHOLOGIST FEES 1 6,270 1 8,128 1 16,255 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 Sub -total 6,270 8,128 16,255 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total expenditures ----------- 6,270 ----------- 8,128 ---------------------- 16,255 10,000 ----------- 10,000 ----------- ----------- 10,000 • • 695 Run date: 08/23/91 ® 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 iBus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotats BURVEX.1.02 Page 94 01 70-15 DIRECT ASSISTANCE Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description I 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget _ 6108 BURIAL EXPENSE 1 4,825 1 1,450 1 2,900 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 5,000 1 Sub -total 4,825 1,450 2,900 10,000 10,000 5,000 Total expenditures ----------- 4,825 ----------- 1,450 --------'-- ----------- 2,900 10,000 ----------- 10,000 ----------- --.-------- 5,000 I I • • • me Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 J •Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 70-20 AID TO DEPENDENT CHILDREN Budget Worksheet Actual for YTD Actual With Subtotals +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ BURVE%.1.02 +-Year Ending Page 95 12/31/92-+ J Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final -Gla Description------------------- --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 --- -Actual ---- Actual Tot Budget --- -Budget -- -Budget 6109 CARE OF JUVENILES ! ! 1 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 1,000 1 Sub -total 1,200 1,200 1,000 -- Total expenditures ---------------------- ----------- ----------- 1,200 --------•-- 1,200 ----------- ----------- 1,000 J J J J J 697 • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 96 01 70-25 AID TO AGING Actual for YTO Actual 4-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ .-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6128 CONTRIBUTION TO EXPENSE 1 27,500 1 13,750 1 27,500 1 27,500 1 27,500 1 27,500 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 397 1 158 1 316 1 480 1 480 1 480 1 Sub -total 27,897 13,908 27,816 27,980 27,980 27,980 Total expenditures expenditures ----------- 27,897 ----'---.-- 13,908 ----------- ----------- 27,816 27,980 ----------- 27,980 ------'---- 27,980 ------- • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - •Bus date: 08/23/1991 01 75-05 EXTENSION SERVICE Budget Actual for Worksheet YTD Actual With Subtotals +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- BURVEX.1.02 *-Year Ending Page 97 12/31/92-* - Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description------------------- - --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 __- -Actual -- -Actual Tot Budget --_ Budget --- Budget 4201 APPOINTED OFFICIALS ! 15,367 1 7,081 1 14,162 1 16,420 1 16,420 1 16,420 1 4312 COUNTY YOUTH COORDINATOR I ! 345 1 690 1 18,000 1 18,000 1 18,000 1 - 4404 SECRETARY 1 20,263 1 10,131 ! 20,263 1 20,263 1 20,263 1 20,871 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 2,804 1 362 1 724 1 1,463 1 1,463 1 1,463 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 1,769 1 797 1 1,593 1 3,044 1 3,044 1 3,239 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 6,418 1 3,016 1 6,033 1 11,987 1 11,987 1 11,986 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 1,506 1 769 1 1,538 1 2,846 1 2,846 1 2,924 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 89 1 97 ! 195 1 228 1 228 1 253 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 118 1 34 1 68 1 159 1 159 1 171 1 Sub -total 48,334 22,632 45,266 74,410 74,410 75,327 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 2,152 1 48 1 95 1 2,542 1 2,542 1 2,542 1 J 5112 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1 1 I 1 1 I I • 5113 PHOTO COPIES/SUPPLIES I I I I I I I 5140 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1 185 1 1 1 265 1 265 1 300 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 1 29 1 59 I 200 1 200 1 200 1 I - 5550 GROCERIES I 291 1 251 1 503 1 300 1 300 1 300 1 Sub -total 2,628 328 657 3,307 3,307 3,342 - 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 2,940 1 1,749 1 3,498 1 3,307 1 3,500 1 3,500 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 297 1 93 1 186 1 300 1 300 1 350 1 6305 AUTO ALLOWANCES 1 9,440 1 4,000 1 8,000 1 11,000 1 11,000 1 11,000 1 6320 TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 1,797 1 1 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 1,800 1 J 6341 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY -HOME AGENT I I I I I I I 6342 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY -MARINE AGENT 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 - 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY I I I 1 I I 1 0 699 L� Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 0812311991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 98 01 75-05 EXTENSION SERVICE Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ ^_ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget _ 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I I I I I I 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 1,135 1 736 1 1,472 1 1,334 1 1,334 1 1,334 1 6660 INSURANCE -COMPUTERS 1 1 18 1 35 1 18 1 18 1 18 1 Sub -total 15,609 6,596 13,191 17,759 17,952 18,002 7101 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1 1,040 I I 1 1 1 1,040 1 7361 EMERGENCY POWER SOURCE 1 I 1 I 1 1 300 1 7520 FIVE OFFICE CHAIRS I I I I 1 1 1,500 1 Sub total 1,040 2,840 Total expenditures -------- --- 67,611 ----------- 29,556 ---------------------- 59,114 95,476 ----------- 95,669 ----------- ----------- 99,511 • • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/19191 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 Page 99 • 01 90-00 TRANSFERS -GENERAL FUND Actual for Year Ending YTD Actual Thru +-------For Year Annualized Ending 12/31/91------+ Projected This year +-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-+ Final GIB Description ____ ______________________________ 12/31/90 ___________ 06/30/1991 ___________ Actual ___________ ___________ Actual Tot Budget ___________ Budget ___________ Budget 9105 TRANSFERS FROM R & B GENERAL ! I 523,926 1 1,047,852 1 523,926 ! 523,926 1 ! 9137 TRANS.FROM BANK FRANCHISE TAX ! 1 35,627 1 71,254 ! ! 35,627 ! ! 9225 TRANSFERS TO AIRPORT FUND !-26,865 1 -18,465 ! -36,930 ! -18,465 1 -18,465 1 1 9235 TRANSFERS TO LAW LIBRARY FUND ! -2,260 1 -3,775 ! -7,550 1 -10,130 1 -10,130 ! 1 9262 TRANSFER TO CAP.PROJ.-LIBRARY 1-200,000 ! ! ! ! ! ! 9263 TRANS.TO CAP.PROJ.-SEWER PHSII ! 1 ! 1 -50,000 1 -50,000 1 I 9271 TRANSFERS TO SAN. LANFILL FUND ! I I I I I ! 9272 TRANS.TO SAN.LANDFILL RPLCMT. 1 -45,000 1 -45,000 1 -90,000 1 -45,000 1 -45,000 1 1 Sub-total -274,125 492,313 984,626 400,331 435,958 Total revenue ----------- -274,125 ----------- 492,313 ----------- ----------- 984,626 400,331 ----------- 435,958 ----------- ----------- • • 011 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:54 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/19,91 ;— Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURUEX.LO2 Page 100 01 98-00 OTHER FINANCING -GENERAL F Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ --Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9302 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 1 I. 1,109 1 2,219 1 -188 1 I I Sub -total 1,109 2,219 -188 Total revenue 1,109 2,219 -188 • • 702 • ROAD AND BRIDGE FUNDS 703 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 — Bus date: 08/23/1991 i 05 00-99 not in system. Gla Description --1141 Created by posting I Subtotal Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 1 Actual for YTD Actual .-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------a .-Year Ending 12/31/92-. Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • • • 704 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 2 • 05 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD 8 BRIDGE GEN Actual for YTD Actual t-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------* *-Tear Ending 12/31/92-* Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla ____ ____ Description ______________________________ ____________________________ 12/31/90 ___________ 06/30/1991 ___________ Actual ___________ ___________ Actual Tot Budget ___________ Budget ___________ Budget __________ 3101 CURRENT TAXES ! 262,215 ! ! ! ! ! 971,850 ! 3102 DELINQUENT TAXES ! 25,867 ! 1 ! ! ! ! 3111 DISCOUNT ON CURRENT TAXES ! ! I ! 1 1 ! 3121 PENALTY AND INTEREST -CURRENT 1 626 ! 1 ! 1 1 1 3122 PENALTY 8 INTEREST-DELINOUENT ! 1,592 1 ! ! ! ! 1 3125 TAX ATTORNEY COMMISSIONS ! 816 ! ! ! ! ! ! 3150 SALES TAXES ! 36,626 1 ! ! ! I ! 3191 GAME REFUGE -IN LIEU OF TAXES ! 2,770 ! ! ! ! 2,000 1 1 3192 HOUSING AUTHORITY -IN LIEU TAX ! 59 ! ! ! 1 1 1 3221 MOTOR VEHICLE PERMITS 1 271,800 1 271,800 1 543,600 1 300,000 1 260,000 1 300,000 1 3222 M.V. PERMITS -SPECIAL R&B COLL. ! 78,594 1 42,263 1 84,526 1 69,413 1 30,000 ! 70,000 ! 3508 FINES -COUNTY COURT 1 22,717 ! 4,177 1 8,355 ! 1,280 1 20,000 1 1,200 1 •3509 3520 FINES -DISTRICT COURT 1 BOND FORFEITURES 1 21,466 1 3,623 ! 15,712 1 2,000 1 31,425 1 4,000 1 37,066 ! 8,000 1 15,000 1 1 35,000 1 5,000 ! 3601 INTEREST 1 168,934 1 32,961 1 65,922 1 81,572 1 150,000 1 75,000 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE ! 2,857 1 372 ! 743 ! ! ! 1 Sub -total 900,562 369,285 738,571 497,331 477,000 1,458,050 Total revenue ----------- 900,562 ----------- 369,285 ---------------------- 738,571 497,331 ----------- 477,000 ----------- ----------- 1,458,050 • -05 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscat year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 3 05 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE GENERAL F Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 2223 Created by posting I I Sub -total 4101 ELECTED OFFICIALS 1 136,680 1 68,340 1 136,680 1 136,680 1 136,680 1 140,780 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 10,666 1 5,101 1 10,203 1 10,281 1 10,465 1 10,770 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 24,775 1 11,737 1 23,473 1 21,538 1 23,497 1 23,497 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 10,155 1 5,016 1 10,032 1 10,279 1 10,279 1 10,587 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 3,864 1 3,556 1 7,112 1 9,280 1 4,716 1 5,258 1 4950 Created by posting 1 I 1 1 ! 1 ! Sub -total 186,140 93,750 187,500 1884058 185,637 190,892 6111 DELINQUENT TAX ATTORNEY FEES 1 821 1 1 1 1 3,200 1 ! 6140 TAX COLLECTION SERVICES 1 2,906 1 1 1 1 9,924 1 1 • 6141 TAX APPRAISAL SERVICES 1 6,287 1 1 1 1 1 I Sub -total 10,014 13,124 Total expenditures ----------- 196,154 ----------- ----------- 93,750 ----------- 187,500 188,058 ----------- 198,761 ----------- ----------- 190,892 • 706 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 4 05 90-00 TRANSFERS-R&B GENERAL FUN Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- --Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 9201 TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUND 1 1 ===-523,926 ! -1, 047,852 I -1.047, 852 1 ===-523,926 I =_________= 1 9206 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT #1 FUND 1 -239,000 ! -84,625 1 -169,250 1 -169,250 1 -169,250 1 -277,857 1 9207 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT #2 FUND ! -283,000 1 -102,025 1 -204,049 1 -204,049 ! -204,049 ! -334,986 1 9208 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT #3 FUND ! -184,000 ! -62,876 1 -125,751 1 -125,751 1 -125,751 1 -206,445 1 9209 TRANSFERS TO PH PCT #4 FUND ! -453,000 1 -169,250 1 -338,499 1 -338,499 ! -338,499 ! -555,712 1 Subtotal -1,159,000 -942,702 -1,885,401 -1,885,401 -1,361,475 -1,375,000 Total revenue ----------- -1,159,000 ----------- -942,702 ---------------------- -1,885,401 -1,885,401 ----------- -1,361,475 ----------- -1,375,000 ----------- • -• 707 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 Page 5 05 98-00 OTHER FINANCING-R&B GENER Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9302 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS I I I I ! ! I Sub-totat Total revenue • • 708 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 06 00-99 not in system. • Gle Des------un====______ 1141 Created by posting Subtotal Total expenditures is E Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotats BURVEX.L02 Page 6 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 709 L Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Oorksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 7 06 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD 8 BRIDGE PCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year +-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-+ Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Final Budget 3601 INTEREST 1 12,824 1 3,486 1 6,972 1 6,828 1 500 1 6,000 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE 1 765 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sub -total 13,589 3,486 6,972 6,828 Soo 6,000 Total revenue ___________ 13,589 ___________ 3,486 ___________ ___________ 6,972 6,828 500 6,000 is 710 Tun date: 01/01/80 a 05:59 lus date: 09/10/1991 06 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE-PCT H1 Actual for Year Ending • Gla Description_-_________12/31190_ Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.L02 Page 1 YID Actual .-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------a .-Year Ending 12/31/92-. Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4101 Created by posting I 1 4308 MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES I 100,721 1 4404 SECRETARY I 8,652 1 4701 PART TIME EMPLOYEES 1 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES ! 11,623 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 9,256 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I 27,245 1 4930 RETIREMENT I 8.127 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION I 13,642 1 - 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT ! 364 1 Subtotal 179,630 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES I 188 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES I 6,770 1 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES I 9,9116 1 • 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 15,515 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES 1 1,830 1 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 79,508 1 5410 TOOLS 1 1.372 1 5420 SIGNS 1 2,883 1 5430 PIPE 1 2,997 1 5440 LUMBER 1 141 1 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES ! 279 1 Sub -total 121,469 6190 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE I 6,253 1 • 50,360 3,963 7,650 1 4,252 1 12,926 1 3,988 1 12,135 1 109 1 95,383 176 ! 2,239 5,201 5,864 62 25,055 322 2,734 94 1 1 41,747 94 1 100, 721 7,926 15,300 8,503 25,852 7,975 24,271 217 190,765 352 4,477 10,401 11,729 123 50,110 645 5,469 189 1 1 83,495 188 1 1 100,721 1 7,200 1 1 12,863 1 8,738 1 25,852 1 7,922 33,988 185 197,469 352 4,477 10,401 11,729 123 50,110 645 5,469 189 1 1 83,495 188 1 1 101,166 1 8,652 1 1 14,000 1 9,487 1 29,371 1 8,259 1 16,994 1 372 1 188,301 200 1 8,000 1 10,000 1 12,000 1 4,000 1 91,122 1 1,100 1 4,000 1 3,000 1 2,000 1 300 1 135,722 10,000 1 104,201 12,980 14,000 1 10,035 1 35,245 1 8,812 ! 19,204 1 394 1 204,871 700 1 8,000 1 10,000 1 12,000 1 4,000 1 91,122 1 1,100 1 4,000 1 3,000 1 2,000 1 300 1 136,222 10,000 1 711 • Run date: 01/01/80 2 05:59 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 09/10/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX-LO2 Page 2 06 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE-PCT #1 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------. --Year Ending 12/31/92-- Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 594 1 266 1 532 1 532 1 700 1 700 I 6221 POSTAGE 1 50 1 41 1 82 1 82 1 100 1 100 1 6231 LEGAL NOTICES ! I I 1 1 50 1 50 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 1 20 1 39 1 39 1 200 1 300 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 18,323 1 535 1 1,069 1 1,069 1 20,000 1 20,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I 1 I I 1 1 6525 EQUIPMENT RENTALS ! 495 1 147 1 294 1 294 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 170 1 1 1 1 300 1 300 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 5,151 1 188 1 376 ! 376 1 5,400 1 5,400 ! 6705 UTILITIES 1 1,757 1 944 1 1,889 1 1,889 1 3,000 1 3,005 1 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS 1 1,315 1 13 1 27 1 27 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 • 6930 PHYSICALS I 1 I I I 100 ! 100 ! 6999 MISCELLANEOUS ! 792 1 I I ! 1,000 1 1,000 1 Subtotal 34,900 2,248 4,496 4,496 47,850 47,950 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 1 7,830 1 1,466 1 2,932 1 2,932 1 25,000 1 25,000 1 - 7810 BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 1 744 1 63 1 126 1 126 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 Sub -total 8,574 1,529 3,058 3,058 30,000 30,000 Total expenditures ----------- 344,573 ----------- 140,907 ----------- ----------- 281,814 288,518 401,873 ----------- 419,043 ----------- • 712 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget worksheet with Subtotals BURVEX.1,02 Page, 10 6 90-00 TRANSFERS-R&S PCT #1 FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------Far Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+' Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description- ----------------- - 12/31/90- 06/30/1991 -_- -Actual ---= Actual Tot Budget -__ Budget --- Budget • 9105 TRANSFERS FROM R&B GENERAL ! 239,000 1 84,625 1 169,250 ! 169,250 1 169,250.1 277,857 1 1110 TRANSFERS FROM FM -LATERAL ROAD 1 42,800 ! 114,212 1 228,423 1 228,423 ! 228,423 1 190,956 1' Sub -total 281,800 198,837 397,673 i397,673 397,673 468,813 , Total revenue ----------- 281,800 ----------- 198,837 --------' ----------- 397,673 397,673 ----------- 397,673 ----------- 468,813 ------ --- jI I • • 713 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 11 06 98-00 OTHER FINANCING-R&B PCT p Actual for YTO Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Die Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget annc ccaaccccanvsccca=ccccssvcccnaa ccaavcccccv nacavccccaa ccaascccnav ccavvncscaa caysccccacc annnccvavcn anncncaann 9302 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS I I I I I I I Subtotal Total revenue • 714 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 12 07 00-99 not in system. Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget •1141 Created by posting I I ! Sub -total Total expenditures • • 715 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 13 07 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD 8 BRIDGE PCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Ancualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3601 INTEREST 1 7,156 1 3,212 1 6,424 1 6,350 1 2,000 1 6,000 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE 1 729 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sub -total 7,885 3,212 6,424 6,350 2,000 6,000 Total revenue ----------- 7,685 ----------- 3,212 ---------------------- 6,424 6,350 -- --------- 2,000 ----------- 6,000 --------- • • 716 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/19,91 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 14 07 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE-PCT #2 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------* *-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • GIs Description _ 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4308 MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES ! 80,010 ! 40,209 1 80,418 1 80,418 1 103,995 1 107,115 1 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 10,122 ! 1,970 1 3,941 1 3,941 1 7,000 1 7,000 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 6,895 1 3,175 1 6,350 1 6,069 1 8,504 1 8,730 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 13,403 1 6,463 1 12,926 1 12,913 1 29,371 1 29,371 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 5,945 1 2,951 1 5,903 1 5,903 1 7,821 1 8,055 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 11,453 1 9,748 ! 19,496 1 32,690 1 16,345 1 18,485 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT ! 270 1 80 1 160 ! 127 1 333 1 343 1 Sub -total 128,098 64,596 129,194 142,061 173,369 179,099 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 4,483 1 2,218 1 4,436 1 4,436 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 13,109 1 1,815 1 3,630 1 3,630 1 7,500 1 7,500 1 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 8,949 1 2,963 1 5,926 1 5,926 1 14,000 1 14,000 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES ! 2,923 1 1,048 1 2,095 1 2,095 1 2,500 1 3,000 1 • 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 116,532 ! 28,261 1 56,522 1 56,522 1 110,195 1 110,000 1 5410 TOOLS ! 1 1 1 1 675 1 1,000 1 5420 SIGNS ! 1,803 1 923 1 1,847 1 1,847 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 5430 PIPE ! 40 1 492 I 984 1 984 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 5440 LUMBER ! 468 ! 441 1 881 1 881 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES 1 62 ! 1 1 ! 125 1 125 1 Sub -total 148,369 38,161 76,321 76,321 151,495 152,125 6190 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE 1 4,908 1 4,967 1 9,934 1 9,934 1 18,000 1 15,000 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 2,055 1 810 1 1,620 1 1,620 1 2,000 1 2,200 1 6221 POSTAGE I 1 I 1 1 120 1 150 1 6231 LEGAL NOTICES 1 I I I I 65 1 100 1 717 • date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Run Budget Worksheet With Subtotals SURVEX.L02 Page 15 Bus date: 08/23/1991 07 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE-PCT p2 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gle Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tat Budget Budget Budget 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I I I ! ! 1 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 10,224 1 1,165 1 2,329 1 2,329 1 11,000 1 11,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I I I ! I 1 6525 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 5,616 1 6,921 1 13,842 1 13,842 1 17,000 1 12,000 1 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 70 1 135 1 270 1 270 1 ISO 1 200 I 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 4,339 1 244 1 488 1 488 1 3,400 1 3,400 I 1 1,069 1 396 1 791 1 791 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 6705 UTILITIES I 1 1 500 1 500 1 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS I 1 I I 1 50 1 100 1 6930 PHYSICALS 1 I 1 439 1 1 1 ! 2,500 1 2,500 1 • 6999 MISCELLANEOUS 28,720 14,638 29,274 29,274 56,285 48,650 sub -total 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 1 10,966 1 8,156 1 16,312 1 16,312 1 10,000 1 25,000 1 10,966 8,156 16,312 16,312 10,000 25,000 Sub -total Total expenditures ----------- 316,153 ----------- - 125,551 ------'---- 251,101 - ----------- ----------- 263,968 391,149 ----------- 404,874 ----------- • 718 • 11 J1 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 07 90-00 TRANSFERS-R&B PCT #2 FUND Actual for Year Ending Gla Descr=ption12/31/90- Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.LO2 Page 16 YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ ♦-Year Ending 12/31/92-* Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 06/30/1991 _--- Actual --- -Actual TotBudget ---_ Budget -- _Budget 9105 TRANSFERS FROM R8B GENERAL ! 283,000 1 102,025 1 204,049 ! 204,049 1 204,049 1 334,986 1 9110 TRANSFERS FROM FM -LATERAL ROAD ! 46,600 ! 61,836 1 123,671 1 123,671 1 123,671 1 103,386 1 Sub -total 329,600 163,861 327,720 327,720 327,720 438,372 ----------- Total revenue ----------- 329,600 ----------- 163,861 327,720 ----------- 327,720 ----------- 327,720 ----------- ----------- - 438,372 719 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 is.. Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 17 07 98-00 OTHER FINANCING-R&B PCT # Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9302 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS I I I I I I 1 Sub -total Total revenue • • 720 Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 08 00-99 not in system. Gla Description • 1141 Created by posting Sub -total Total expenditures • • Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget worksheet with Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 18 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget •21 Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 04/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX-l02 Page 19 08 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD 8 BRIDGE PCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Tear Ending 12/31/92-+ Gla Description Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3601 INTEREST 1 17,724 1 8,286 1 16,572 1 16,420 I 2,500 1 12,000 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE 1 457 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 3991 PATRONAGE DIVIDEND 1 8 1 1 1 I I Sub -total 18,189 8,286 16,572 16,420 2,500 12,000 Total revenue ___________ 18,189 ___________ 8,286 ___________ _________ 16,572 16,420 2,500 12,000 • • B �� • • • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 08 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE PCT R3 Gla Description 4308 MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES ! 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY ! 4920 GROUP INSURANCE I 4930 RETIREMENT ! 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 Subtotal 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ! 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES ! 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES 1 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 5410 TOOLS ! 5420 SIGNS I 5430 PIPE ! 5440 LUMBER ! 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES ! Subtotal 6158 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR/ARCHITECT 1 6190 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 6221 POSTAGE I Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 20 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 42,934 1 22,419 1 44,839 1 44,839 1 64,973 1 66,922 1 12,889 1 11,826 1 23,652 1 9,070 1 20,000 1 20,000 1 3,930 1 2,565 1 5,131 1 4,037 1 6,509 1 6,650 1 12,387 1 5,874 1 11,748 1 11,748 1 17,623 1 17,623 1 3,530 1 1,646 1 3,291 1 3,291 1 4,886 1 5,033 1 7,665 1 5,876 1 11,753 1 25,026 1 12,513 1 14,081 1 167 1 65 1 130 1 86 1 255 1 261 1 83,502 50,271 100,544 98,097 126,759 130,570 29 1 41 1 81 1 81 1 75 1 75 1 2,783 1 3,572 1 7,144 1 7,144 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 6,318 1 1,232 1 2,465 1 2,465 1 6,500 1 6,500 1 5,589 1 2,017 1 4,034 1 4,034 1 11,000 1 11,000 1 1,943 1 172 1 344 1 344 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 47,930 1 5,571 1 11,141 1 11,141 1 301,044 1 301,044 1 121 1 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 471 1 455 1 910 I 910 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 412 1 1 1 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 328 1 205 1 411 1 411 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 ! 176 1 353 1 353 1 500 1 500 1 65,924 13,441 26,883 26,883 332,119 332,119 2,041 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,008 1 469 1 938 1 938 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 619 1 204 1 408 1 408 1 800 1 800 1 I I 1 1 291 101 723 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 -Bus date: 08/23/1991 08 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE PCT k3 Gla Description 6231 LEGAL NOTICES 1 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS, 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 1 6525 EQUIPMENT RENTALS I 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE I 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 6705 UTILITIES I 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS I 6920 PERMITS 1 6930 PHYSICALS 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS ! Sub -total 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT I 7401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT I -Subtotal Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 21 Actual for YTD Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ t-Year Ending 12/31/92-i Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1 1 I 1 76 1 95 1 45 1 1 1 1 100 1 100 1 5,978 1 I 877 1 1,753 1 ! 1,753 1 6,000 1 ! 6,000 1 1,478 1 ! 1 1 I I 2,500 1 I 2,500 1 70 1 1 1 1 250 1 250 1 3,502 1 179 1 358 1 358 1 4,825 1 4,825 1 1,008 1 503 1 1,006 1 1,006 1 1,200 1 1,200 1 1 159 1 318 1 318 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 100 1 26 1 51 1 51 1 50 ! 50 1 I I 1 1 30 ! 30 1 I 15,849 I 2,417 I 4,832 ! 4,832 ! 19,860 ! 19,860 8,324 ! 209 1 419 1 419 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 I 1 1 1 200 1 200 1 8,324 209 419 419 10,200 10,200 ----------- 173,599 ----------- 66,338 ----------- ----------- 132,678 130,231 ----------- 488,938 ----------- 492,749 ----------- • • 724 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Calhoun County Budget Worksheet Auditors Office With Subtotals Fiscal year to period ending BURVE%.L02 06/30/1991 Page 22 08 90-00 TRANSFERS-R8B PCT H3 FUND Actual for YTO Actual --------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ • Gla Description ____ ______________________________ Year Ending 12/31/90 90 06/30/1991 =06/30/1991 Annualized ual _-Protected Actual Actual This year Tot Budget - _Proposed Budget ====BFinal Budget 9105 TRANSFERS FROM R8B GENERAL ! 184,000 ! 62,876 ! 125,751 ! 125,751 ! 125,751 1 206,445 ! 9110 TRANSFERS FROM FM -LATERAL ROAD 1 25,000 ! 84,202 1 168,403 ! 168,403 ! 168,403 1 140,781 1 Sub -total 209,000 147,078 294,154 294,154 294,154 347,226 Total revenue ----------- 209,000 ----------- 147,078 ----------- ----------- 294,154 294,154 ----------- 294,154 ----------- ----------- 347,226 is 0 Run date: 08/23/91 R 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 08 98-00 OTHER FINANCING-R8B PCT p Actual for Year Ending GIs Description 12/31/90 9302 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS Sub -total Total revenue Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 23 YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12131/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • • 726 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 24 09 00-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE -PRECINCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ " Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description------------------- --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 --- -Actual Actual _Tot Budget --- -Budget -- -Budget 2120 Created by posting ! ! ! ! ! ! Sub -total • • ------- --------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total expenditures W7 • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget 1lorksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 25 09 00-99 not in system. Actual for YTD Actual t-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- r-Year Ending 12/31/92-s Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Ole Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1141 Created by posting I I I I I 1 I Subtotal Total expenditures E • 728 • • • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 09 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD & BRIDGE PCT Gla Description 3370 USDA COMMODITY PROGRAM REIMB. 1 3311 STREET MAINTENANCE-SEADRIFT I 3312 WSND-WATER LINE REIMBURSEMENT I 3313 TPW BOAT RAMP MAINT. REIMB. I 3454 CULVERT PIPE INSTALLATION I 3601 INTEREST I 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE I 3902 REBATES -RESTITUTION I 3965 MECHANIC PAYROLL REIMB.-PCT 1 I 3966 MECHANIC PAYROLL REIMB.-LANDFL 1 Sub -total Total revenue Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/3O/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 26 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9,680 1 5,004 1 10,007 1 11,073 1 7,000 1 70,000 1 6,000 1 2,000 1 4,000 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 1 2,060 1 1 ! ! ! ! 637 1 159 1 319 1 637 1 1 637 1 225 1 190 1 380 1 1 1 ! 26,411 1 6,990 1 13,981 1 15,323 1 8,000 1 12,000 1 4,590 1 ! ! ! ! I 470 1 470 1 939 1 1 1 1 840 1 4,770 1 9,540 1 3,903 1 1 I ! 454 ! 909 1 517 1 1 I 50,913 20,037 40,075 37,393 21,000 22,637 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 50,913 20,037 40,075 37,393 21,000 22,637 NV : • Run date: 08/23/91 O 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Pege 27 09 55-00 U.S.D.A. COMMODITY PROGRA Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Die Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget _-4897 STORAGE: SALARIES 1 108 1 54 1 108 1 108 1 2,069 1 2,069 1 4898 DISTRIBUTION: SALARIES 1 5,180 1 3,231 1 6,462 1 4,608 1 4,901 1 4,901 1 - Sub -total 5,288 3,285 6,570 4,716 6,970 6,970 5598 DISTRIBUTION: MATERIALS 1 11 1 9 1 17 1 17 1 132 1 132 1 Sub -total 11 9 17 17 132 132 6705 UTILITIES 1 1,260 1 630 1 1,260 1 1,260 1 1,386 ! 1,386 1 6990 DISTRIBUTION: TRANSPORTATION 1 1,783 1 1 1 1 2,376 1 2,376 1 6991 DISTRIBUTION: ADVERTISING 1 3 1 ! 1 1 132 1 132 1 6992 STORAGE: WAREHOUSE CHARGES 1 1,292 1 547 1 1,094 1 1,094 1 1,380 1 1,380 1 6993 STORAGE: REPAIRS 1 204 1 1 1 ! I 1 • Sub -total 4,542 1,177 2,354 2,354 5,274 5,274 Total expenditures ----------- 9,1141 ----------- 4,471 ---------------------- .8,941 7,087 ----------- 12,376 ----------- ----------- 12,376 • 730 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 28 09 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE-PCT k4 Actual for YTD Actual +------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 4308 MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES ! 186,413 1 94,455 1 188,910 ! 186,070 1 186,071 1 191,652 1 4404 SECRETARY 1 18,799 1 9,399 1 18,799 1 18,799 1 18,799 1 19,363 I 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 13,438 1 7,648 1 15,296 1 6,656 1 10,000 1 6,656 1 4899 USDA COMMODITY PROGRAM OFFSET ! -5,378 ! -3,285 1 -6,570 ! -4,716 ! ! -4,716 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 16,726 1 8,326 1 16,652 ! 15,847 ! 16,460 1 16,652 ! 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 51,068 ! 24,046 1 48,092 1 48,079 1 58,742 1 58,741 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 15,247 ! 7,623 1 15,246 1 15,038 1 15,407 1 15,869 I 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ! 23,201 ! 21,436 ! 42,871 1 57,898 1 28,949 1 32,208 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 656 ! 212 1 424 1 337 1 645 1 653 1 .I Sub -total 320,170 169,860 339,720 344,008 335,073 337,078 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ! 181 1 98 ! 195 1 144 1 350 1 350 1 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 4,274 1 1,141 1 2,282 ! 1,983 ! 5,500 1 5,000 1 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES ! 22,813 1 8,003 1 16,007 1 16,103 ! 26,000 1 24,000 1 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 26,104 1 7,250 1 14,500 1 16,649 1 27,000 1 27,000 1 5240 TIRES AND TUBES ! 4,325 1 260 1 519 ! 423 ! 5,000 1 5,000 1 • 168,878 1 97,465 1 194,930 1 197,291 1 276,732 1 280,732 1 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 5410 TOOLS 1 2,488 1 545 1 1,090 1 1,308 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 5420 SIGNS 1 2,338 1 91 1 183 1 219 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 5430 PIPE I 3,795 I 1 I ! 3,500 1 3,500 1 5440 LUMBER 1 647 1 567 1 1,135 1 1,297 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES 1 212 1 6 1 13 1 15 1 160 1 160 1 5599 USDA COMMODITY PROGRAM OFFSET 1 -11 ! -7 1 -14 1 -17 1 1 -17 1 Sub -total 236,044 115,419 230,840 235,415 349,742 351,225 6110 LEGAL SERVICES I 1 1 1 1 50 1 1 • 731 I •. Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 29 09 85-00 ROAD AND BRIDGE-PCT k4 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31191------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Ole Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6190 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE 1 1,740 1 2,640 1 5,280 1 6,336 1 3,377 1 2,000 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 1,560 1 625 1 1,251 1 1,245 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 6221 POSTAGE 1 41 1 16 1 33 l 39 1 75 1 75 1 6231 LEGAL NOTICES 1 1 1 1 ! 50 1 50 1 - 6520 MACHINE MAINTENANCE I I I 1 1 75 1 75 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 11,682 1 640 1 1,280 1 1,403 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 6522 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I I 1 1 I I ! 6525 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 1,623 1 1 1 1 1,623 1 1,000 1 '^ 6550 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1 70 1 98 1 196 1 235 ! 600 1 600 ! 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 6705 UTILITIES 1 6,627 1 1 3,115 1 -125 1 1,525 1 -250 1 3,050 1 -300 1 2,962 6,950 1 4,000 1 • ! 1 4,000 1 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS 1 2,186 1 816 1 1,632 1 1,436 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 6930 PHYSICALS I 30 I 1 1 ! 100 I 100 1 6994 USDA COMMODITY PROGRAM OFFSET 1 -1,900 ! -1 1 -2 1 -1 ! ! I 6999 MISCELLANEOUS I I I I 1 1 I --Sub-total 26,774 6,234 12,470 13,355 28,900 19,900 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 1 46,762 1 26,793 1 53,585 1 64,302 1 60,000 1 60,000 1 -- 7810 BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 1 9,196 1 4,625 1 9,251 1 11,101 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 Sub-totat 55,958 31,418 62,836 75,403 65,000 65,000 Total expenditures ........... 638,946 ........... 322,931 ........... ........... 645,866 668,181 .......... 778,715 ........... ------ 773,203 - • '732 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 30 • 09 90-00 TRANSFERS-R8B PCT #4 FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description ____ ______________________________ _ 12/31/90 ___________ 06/30/19,91 ___________ Actual ___________ _____ Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9105 TRANSFERS FROM R8B GENERAL 1 453,000 ! 169,250 1 338,499 1 338,499 ! 338,499 ! 555,712 1 9110 TRANSFERS FROM FM -LATERAL ROAD ! 85,600 ! 137,948 ! 275,895 ! 275,895 ! 275,895 1 230,642 1 Sub -total 538,600 307,198 614,394 614,394 614,394 786,354 Total revenue ----------- 538,600 ----------- 307,198 ---------------------- 614,394 614,394 ----------- 614,394 ----------- ----------- 786,354 is • 733 •. Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 -- Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 31 09 98-00 OTHER FINANCING-R8B PCT It Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9302 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS Sub -total -_------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- Total revenue • Cl 734 Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 32 10 00-99 not in system. Actual for YID Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ — Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • 1141 Created by ---------- ' ----------- i ___________ ' `_________- r= ------ __-_ ' i -_ _______ ' Sub -total — Total expenditures ----------- ----------- ---------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- C i 735 • Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1_02 P6ge 33 10 01-00 REVENUE -FARM 8 LATERAL RO Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending . Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3101 CURRENT TAXES 1 395,506 1 440,459 1 880,918 1 436,007 1 436,007 1 438,900 1 3102 DELINQUENT TAXES 1 40,550 1 2,047 1 4,093 1 5,615 1 1 5,000 1 3111 DISCOUNT ON CURRENT TAXES 1 -157 1 -103 1 -206 1 -414 1 1 1 3121 PENALTY AND INTEREST -CURRENT 1 953 1 743 1 1,487 1 1,055 1 1 1,000 1 3122 PENALTY 8 INTEREST -DELINQUENT 1 2,732 1 717 1 1,435 1 2,044 1 1 2,000 1 3125 TAX ATTORNEY COMMISSIONS 1 1,653 1 549 1 1,097 1 1,643 1 1 1,600 1 3150 SALES TAXES 1 55,631 1 1 1 1 1 1 3191 GAME REFUGE -IN LIEU OF TAXES 1 4.262 1 3,312 1 6,624 1 218 1 1 60 1 3192 HOUSING AUTHORITY -IN LIEU TAX 1 90 1 1 1 ! 1 I 3601 INTEREST 1 90,635 1 41,219 1 82,438 1 95,780 1 55,000 1 75,000 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE 1 4,127 1 1 1 1 1 ! • Sub -total 595,982 488,943 977,886 541,948 491,OG7 523,560 Total revenue revenue ----------- 595,982 ----------- 488,943 ---------------------- 977,886 541,948 ----------- 491,007 ------' ---- 523,560 ------ • 736 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/19191 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 34 10 85-00 FARM AND LATERAL ROAD FUN Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Endin Annualized Protected This year P=Budged Final • Gla Description ____ __scrip_______________________ 72/31/90 31/90 _Th=u___ 06/30/1991 Actual _ Actual Tot Budget - gadget _- Budget 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES ! ! t ! 5,000 ! 5,000 1 5,000 1 Sub -total 5,000 5,000 5,000 6111 DELINQUENT TAX ATTORNEY FEES 1 1,384 1 551 1 1,102 1 1,644 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 6140 TAX COLLECTION SERVICES 1 4,402 ! 4,439 1 8,877 ! 4,385 1 12,500 ! 4,500 1 6141 TAX APPRAISAL SERVICES 1 9,549 1 7,299 1 14,598 1 70,500 ! 10,491 1 10,500 1 6158 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR/ARCHITECT ! ! ! I ! I 1 Sub -total 15,335 12,289 24,577 16,529 24,991 17,000 7951 WIDEN FM 1090 ! 175,000 ! I I ! I 1 7952 FM 1090 AND HWY 87 ROW PURL. 1 1 I I I 1 215,000 1 Sub -total 175,000 215,000 Total expenditures ----------- 190,335 ----------- 12,289 ---------------------- 24,577 21,529 ----------- 29,991 ----------- 237,000 ----------- is Run date: OS/23/91 Q 08:55 -Bus date: 08/23/1991 10 90-00 TRANSFERS -FM -LATERAL ROAD Gla Description 9206 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT #1 FUND 1 9207 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT #2 FUND 1 9208 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT #3 FUND 1 9209 TRANSFERS TO R&B PCT k4 FUND I Subtotal Total revenue Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 35 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget -42,800 1-114,212 1 -228,423 1 -228,423 1-228,423 1-190,956 1 -46,600 1-61,836 1 -123,671 1 -123,671 1 -123,671 1-103,386 1 . -25,000 1-84,202 1 -168,403 1 -168,403 1-168,403 I-140,781 1 -85,600 1 -137,948 1 -275,895 1 -275,895 1-275,895 1-230,642 1 -200,000 -398,198 -796,392 -796,392 -796,392 -665,765 ----------- -200,000 ----------- -398,198 ---------------------- -796,392 -796,392 ----------- -796,392 ---------------------- -665,765 • 738 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 36 • 11 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD MAINTENANCE- Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91......+ +.Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tat Budget Budget Budget 3601 INTEREST 1 5,393 1 2,177 1 4,353 1 1 1 1 Sub -total 5,393 2,177 4,353 Total revenue ----------- 5,393 ----------- 2,177 ---------------------- 4,353 ----------- ----------- ----------- • • 739 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 11 85-00 ROAD MAINTENANCE-PCT #1 We Description 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 Sub -total 6101 CONTRACT SERVICES I 6999 MISCELLANEOUS I Sub -total 7301 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT I Sub -total Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 • Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 37 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget I 1 I 1 20,000 1 20,000 1 20,000 20,000 1 I ! 1 12,000 1 12,000 1 1 I I 1 3,000 1 3,000 1 15,000 15,000 1 1 1 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 15,000 15,000 --------------'----------------------------- ----------- - -----_--- I -----___..- 50,000 50,000 • • 74 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 38 12 00-99 not in system. Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • -Gla Description_________________12/31/90- 06/30/1991 _Actual Actual Tot Budget _Budget =_= Budget 1141 Created by posting ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sub -total Total expenditures • • 741 • Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEx-l02 Page 39 12 01-00 REVENUE -ROAD MAINTENANCE- Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3601 INTEREST I 848 1 344 1 688 1 1 1 1 i Sub -total 848 344 688 _ Total revenue ----------- 848 ----------- 344 ----------- ----------- 688 ----------- ----------- ----------- • • 742 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Rug date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 40 13 01-00 REVENUE -LATERAL ROAD-PCT Actual for YTD Actual *-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------- +-Year Ending 12/31/92-• Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Gla Description 12/31/90_ 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget _Budget -_ Budget 3160 GASOLINE.TAXES 1 3,604 1 1 1 3,600 1 3,600 1 3,600 1 3601 INTEREST ! 298 1 131 1 263 1 278 1 1 200 1 Sub -total 3,902 131 263 3,878 3,600 3,800 Total revenue ----------- 3,902 ----------- 131 ---------------------- 263 3,878 ----------- 3,600 ----------- 3,800 ----------- • • 743 • Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 — Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEx.1.02 Page 41 13 85-00 LATERAL ROAD -PRECINCT #1 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31191------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Me Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 3,899 1 1 1 3,905 1 3,905 1 3,800 1 Sub -total 3,899 3,905 3,905 3,800 Total expenditures ----------- 3,899 ----------- ---------------------- 3,905 ----------- 3,905 ----------- 3,800 ----------- is '744 Run date: 08/23/91 B 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget 1lorksheet With Subtotals BURVEA.1_02 Page 42 14 01-00 REVENUE -LATERAL ROAD-PCT Actual for Year Ending YTO Actual Thru + ------.For Year AMUBIi zed Ending 12131191------- Projected This year ♦-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Proposed Final Gia Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3160 GASOLINE TAXES 1 3,604 ! 1 1 3,600 1 3,600 1 3,600 1 3601 INTEREST ! 298 1 131 1 263 1 278 1 1 200 1 Sub -total 3,902 131 263 3,878 3,600 3,800 Total revenue ----------- 3,902 ----------- 131 ----------- ----------- 263 3,878 ----------- 3,600 ---""---- -----...--- 3,800 745 Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 43 14 85-00 LATERAL ROAD -PRECINCT 02 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------a t-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 3,899 1 1 ! 3,905 1 3,995 1 3,800 1 Subtotal 3,899 3,905 3,905 3,800 Total expenditures ----------- 3,899 ----------- ----------- ----------- 3,905 ----------- 3,905 ----------- - 3,800 ---------- 746 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Calhoun County Budget worksheet Auditors Office with Subtotals Fiscal year to period ending BURVEX.1.02 06/30/1991 Page 44 15 01-00 REVENUE -LATERAL ROAD-PCT Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ • Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3160 GASOLINE TAXES ! 3,604 ! ! ! 3,600 ! 3,600 1 3,600 1 3601 INTEREST 1 298 1 131 1 263 1 278 1 1 200 1 Sub -total 3,902 131 263 3,878 3,600 3,800 Total revenue ----------- 3,902 ----------- 131 ---------------------- 263 3,878 ----------- 3,600 ----------- 3,800 ----------- • 747 Run date: 08/23/91 2 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 15 85-00 LATERAL ROAD -PRECINCT #3 Gla Description 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES Subtotal Total expenditures Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 45 Actual for YTD Actual + ------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3,899 1 1 1 3,905 1 3,905 1 3,800 1 3,899 3,905 3,905 3,800 ----------- 3,899 ----------- ----------- ----------- 3,905 ----------- 3,905 ----------- 3,800 ----------- • • • i • • • • Run date: 08/23/91 is 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 16 01-00 REVENUE -LATERAL ROAD-PCT Gla Description 3160 GASOLINE TAXES 3601 INTEREST Sub -total Total revenue Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 46 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final --12/31/90- 06/30/1991 -_-_ Actual --- -Actual Tot Budget ---- Budget -- -Budget 3,604 1 1 1 3,600 1 3,600 1 3,600 1 298 1 131 1 263 1 278 1 1 200 1 3,902 131 263 3,878 3,600 3,800 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3,902 131 263 3,878 3,600 3,800 749 0. Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 - Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 47 16 85.00 LATERAL ROAD -PRECINCT p4 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 5401 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLIES 1 3,899 1 1 1 3,905 1 3,905 1 3,800 1 Sub -total 3,899 3,905 3,905 3,800 — I Total expenditures ----------- 3,899 ----------- ---------------------- 3,905 ----------- 3,905 ----------- 3,800 ----------- 750 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Calhoun County Budget Worksheet Auditors Office With Subtotals Fiscal year to period ending BURVEX.l02 06/30/1991 Page 48 • 17 00-01 not in system. GIs Description Actual for Year Ending 12/31/90 YTD Actual Thru 06/30/1991 +-------For Year Annualized Actual Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending Projected This year Proposed Actual Tot Budget Budget 12/31/92-+ Final Budget 1141 Created by posting ! ! ! ! ! Sub -total Total expenditures • • 751 • Run date: 08/23/91 @ 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 49 17 00-99 not in system. Actual for YTD Actual +----.--For Year Ending 12/31/91------a +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 1141 Created by posting I 1 I I 1 I Sub -total Total expenditures • • 752 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 50 17 01-00 REVENUE -FLOOD CONTROL-PCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Yee= Ending Thru Annualized ected year Proposed • Gla Description ____ ______________________________ 12/31/90 Ob/30/1991 =__ 30/1991 Actual -P=oActual Tot Actual Tot Budget Budget t _— ====BFinal Budget I 3601 INTEREST- 1 7,021 1 2,706 1 5,412 1 5,500 1 1 4,500 1 — Sub -total 7,021 2,706 5,412 5,500 4,500 Total revenue ----------- 7,021 ----------- 2,706 ---------------------- 5,412 ----------- 5,500 ----------- 4,500 -------­- ' • • 753 • Run date: 08/23/91 8 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 ' -Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 51 17 85-00 FLOOD CONTROL -PRECINCT #1 Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 2221 Created by posting I I I 1 I I I 2222 Created by posting 1 1 1 I ! I f r 2223 Created by posting I 1 I I I 1 I Subtotal — 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES i 1 3,160 1 1 1 I 10,000 1 10,000 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY 1 242 1 1 1 1 765 1 765 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 184 1 -823 1 -1,647 1 -1,647 1 1,473 1 1,473 1 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 1 9 1 1 1 1 19 1 19 1 • Sub -total 3,595 -823 -1,647 -1,647 12,257 12,257 i 5402 FLOOD CONTROL SUPPLIES 1 990 1 1 1 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 Sub -total 990 15,000 15,000 6190 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE 1 60 1 1 1 1 15,407 1 15,407 1 6525 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 I 1 1 I 10,000 1 10,000 1 .Sub -total 60 25,407 25,407 Total expenditures •---------- 4,645 ----------- -823 --•--•---------------- -1,647 -1,647 ----------- 52,664 ........... 52,664 ........... • 754 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%,1.02 Page 52 18 01-00 REVENUE -FLOOD CONTROL-PCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gla Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3601 INTEREST - ! 77 1 32 ! 63 ! 70 1 1 50 1 Sub -total 77 32 63 70 50 Total revenue ----------- 77 ----------- 32 ---------------------- 63 70 ----------- ----------- ----------- 50 • I 755 Run date: 08/23/91 B 08:55 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 • Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 53 19 01-00 REVENUE -FLOOD CONTROL-PCT Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed final Ola Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 3601 INTEREST 1 1,071 1 439 1 878 1 957 1 1 600 1 Sub -total 1,071 439 878 957 800 Total revenue ----------- 1,071 ----------- 439 ---------------------- 878 ----------- 957 ---------------------- 800 • 756 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:55 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 54 • 19 85-00 FLOOD CONTROL -PRECINCT 43 Actual for Year Ending YTD Actual Thru +-------For Year Annualized Ending 12/31/91------+ Projected This year +-Year Ending Proposed 12/31/92-+ - Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 6190 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE ! ! I 1 1 1,600 1 1,600 1 Subtotal 1,600 1,600 Total expenditures ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 1,600 ----------- 1,600 ----------- 757 •. --Nurber of lines printed = 830 *** End of report *** • 758 Run date: 08/23/91 g 08:56 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals Bl1RVE%.1.02 Page 1 71 00-99 not in system. Actual for YTO Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • Ola Description___________________ __12/31/90- 06/30/1991 —__ Actual =__ _Actual =Tot Budges _Budget Budget 1141 Created by posting I I I I I I I Sub-total Total expenditures ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------- 759 SANITARY LANDFILL ENTERPRISE FUND •. • 760 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08.56 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEK.1.02 Page 2 71 01-00 REVENUE -SANITARY LANDFILL Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final • GIs Description------------------- --12/31/90_ 06/30/1991 --- -Actual -_-- Actual Tot Budget __-- Budget --- Budget 3220 PERMIT FEES -GARBAGE GOBBLER 1 5,615 1 1,660 1 3,320 1 7,000 1 7,500 1 7,000 1 3470 SERVICES -CITY OF PORT LAVACA 1 92,100 1 38,375 1 76,750 1 92,100 1 92,058 1 92,100 1 3471 SERVICES -CITY OF PT. COMFORT 1 7,860 1 3,930 1 7,860 1 7,860 1 7,860 1 7,860 1 3472 SERVICES -CITY OF SEADRIFT 1 9,231 1 4,585 1 9,170 1 9,170 1 9,170 1 9,170 1 3473 SERVICES -OTHER USERS 1 112,181 1 59,374 1 118,748 1 85,000 1 70,000 1 115,000 1 3601 INTEREST 1 22,999 1 9,943 1 19,886 1 20,000 1 8,500 1 15,000 1 3901 REBATES -PREVIOUS EXPENSE 1 753 1 1 1 1 1 1 3961 WORKERS- COMP.INS.RECOVERIES I I I I I I I 3990 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1 300 1 30 1 60 1 1 1 1 Sub -total 251,039 117,897 235,794 221,130 195, ON 246,730 Total reverwe ----------- 251,039 ----------- 117,897 ----------- ----------- 235,794 221,130 ----------- 195,088 --------'-- 246,130 ----------- C] • 761 • Run date: 08/23/91 W 08:56 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVE%.1.02 Page 3 71 50.00 SANITARY LANDFILL FUND Actual for YTD Actual +-------For Year Ending 12/3l/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Me Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 4230 LANDFILL SUPERVISOR 1 3,900 1 7,102 1 14,204 1 4,058 1 21,924 1 25,081 1 4308 MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES 1 58,941 1 29,470 1 58,941 1 58,941 1 58,941 1 60,710 1 4310 SITE MONITOR 1 9,300 1 7,586 1 15,172 1 14,400 1 14,400 1 14,832 1 4404 SECRETARY 1 17,107 1 8,437 I 16,874 1 18,147 1 18,657 1 19,190 1 4701 PART TIME EMPLOYEES I I ! 1 I ! I 4705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 1 8,732 1 2,059 1 4,118 1 4,300 1 10,400 1 10,400 1 4905 SUPERVISORY SUPPLEMENTS 1 1 500 1 1,000 1 2,000 1 2,400 1 1 4910 SOCIAL SECURITY I 7,496 1 4,163 1 8,325 ! 7,817 ! 9,847 1 10,099 1 4920 GROUP INSURANCE 1 19,144 1 12,198 1 24,397 1 18,761 1 35,245 1 35,245 1 4930 RETIREMENT 1 6,453 1 3,897 1 7,794 1 7,160 1 8,745 1 9,010 1 4940 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 1 4,717 1 6,769 1 13,538 1 23,250 1 11,632 1 13,146 1 • 4950 FEDERAL/STATE UNEMPLOYMENT I 293 1 104 1 208 1 163 1 379 1 391 1 Sub -total 136,083 82,285 164,571 158,997 192,570 198,104 5101 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 727 1 672 1 1,345 1 1, 672 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 --, 5190 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1 489 1 335 1 669 1 1,023 1 400 1 400 1 - 5220 MACHINERY PARTS/SUPPLIES 1 9,308 1 3,205 1 6,410 1 1,585 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 5230 GASOLINE/OIL/DIESEL/GREASE 1 14,111 1 7,081 1 14,163 1 12,658 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 5410 TOOLS 1 1,104 1 354 1 708 1 372 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 5501 BUILDING SUPPLIES/PARTS 1 380 1 766 1 1,532 1 600 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 5503 JANITOR SUPPLIES 1 223 1 155 1 310 1 620 1 300 1 300 1 Subtotal 26,342 12,568 25,137 18,530 29,200 29,200 6191 REG.SOLID WASTE MGMT GRANT 1 1 4,796 1 9,592 1 19,184 1 4,796 1 1 6210 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1 590 1 231 1 461 1 339 1 750 1 750 1 6231 LEGAL NOTICES I I I 1 1 300 1 300 1 • 762 Run date: 08/23/91 a 08:56 Calhoun County Auditors Office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.1.02 Page 4 71 50-00 SANITARY LANDFILL FUND Actual for YTD Actual «-------For Year Ending 12/31/91-----+ 4-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final Gta Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget • ____ ______________________________ 6305 AUTO ALLOWANCES 1 ___________ 1,800 1 ___________ 900 1 ___________ ____ 1,800 1 - 1,800 1 1,800 _ _________ 1 1,800 1 __________ 6310 TRAVEL -IN COUNTY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6420 TRAINING TRAVEL -OUT OF COUNTY 1 959 1 846 1 1,693 1 75 1 4,750 1 4,750 1 6450 TRAINING -REGISTRATION FEES I I ! I I 1 1 6521 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1 5,071 1 2,212 1 4,424 1 2,207 1 20,000 1 20,000 1 6525 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 6,383 I 311 1 622 1 884 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 6526 DEPRECIATION 1 54,719 1 1 1 1 1 1 6630 INSURANCE -VEHICLE 8 EQUIPMENT 1 2,675 1 133 1 266 1 1 3,300 1 3,300 1 6705 UTILITIES 1 841 1 321 1 641 1 599 1 900 1 900 1 6750 BUILDING REPAIRS 1 562 1 1 1 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 6922 PERMIT FEES -TEXAS DEPT. HEALTH 1 11,396 1 2,721 1 5,442 1 2,000 1 17,530 1 17,500 1 6930 PHYSICALS 1 30 1 1 1 1 50 1 50 1 6999 MISCELLANEOUS ! 20 1 1 1 1 50 1 50 1 Sub -total 85,046 12,471 24,941 27,088 60,226 55,400 • _ 7941 FENCE I 7942 LANDFILL ROAD REPAIRS 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 5,000 1 - Sub -total 5,000 Total expenditures ----------- 247,471 ----------- 107,324 ----------- ----------- 214,649 204,615 ----------- 281,996 ----------- ----------- 287,704 W 763 • Run date: 08/23/91 0 08:56 Calhoun County Auditors office Fiscal year to period ending 06/30/1991 Bus date: 08/23/1991 Budget Worksheet With Subtotals BURVEX.L02 Page 5 71 90-00 TRANSFERS -SANITARY LANDFI Actual for YTD Actual -------- For Year Ending 12/31/91------+ +-Year Ending 12/31/92-+ Year Ending Thru Annualized Projected This year Proposed Final GIs Description 12/31/90 06/30/1991 Actual Actual Tot Budget Budget Budget 9101 TRANSFERS FROM GENERAL FUND I I I ! 1 1 ! Sub -total Total revenue • a, BUDGET AMENDMENTS - 1991 - R & B. PCT. 13, ELECTIONS, POINT COMFORT FIRE DEPT.- OLIVIA AMBULANCE SERVICE- R & B. PCT. 14, AND COUNTY CLERK Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the following Budget Amendments for 1991 be approved. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: 9L 6 V" &CuAc� jl'b11LL-) (Department making this request) Date: q-d-q1 I request an amendment to the ffi budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account-# M - g600- 611 • fl�-65Do .501 Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Amendment Amount Reason loo U I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. • Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): L. am 765 BIIDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Cc issioners' Court % From: Jn Z 7I (Department making this request) Date: I request an amendment to the / budget for the yea following line items in my department: Amendment GL_Account # Account Name Amount Reason p/--JO -aS3 � F40 �oo 0 1-go o5_.5I.5U ����.n� �z/ S71 ° Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: i I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: ,,4 Y' �i , Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 9 1g9f • BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST isTo: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: A �sn.% -tR- L4pt (DepartA nt making this request) Date: `$ ,�_(p 91 A C� I request an amendment to the M I budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account - 0LA518 - -7311- 01-4619 - IN of-q(i -moo 014S N -1a 1 Account Name Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Amendment Amount W .a q &0 61) - ------ a Reason ------------------- a� --: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: UY _ Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 91991 767 EIIDGET AMENDMENT REQIIEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: m lA��.06tiC )DiL�h G (Department making this request) Date: 7 43_9 I request an amendment to the MI budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account // Amendment Account Name Amount - euv q 1 Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: 4 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court arpproval is obtained. Signature of official/department head:' i CL Date of Commissioners' Court approval: r`)• o Mn Date posted to General Ledger account(s): LM BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhooun County Commissioners' Court • From: `fCOCLL-LYLl QU.I�PCiJ .Ji,1) (Department making this request) Date: 7-A0 _(a I I request an amendment to the l�ql budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -#- ---Account Name --- ---Amount ---- -------Reason ---------------- OA-85�o-5yo1 Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: ����_ Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 769 BIIDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun Count Commissioners' Court From: � 4 R PkCc ,,AC+ i-OW , (Department making this request) Date: q_ q -q I request an amendment to the 091 budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount Reason ✓.O I'DSOO-�eid0 -Q�l f.�D©' Oo�1 �N4 Q' �W Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners "Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 91991 M C n U • BQDGET AMENDMENT REgIIEST To: Calhoun County Commissi ers' Court • From:gt �. Ci (Department making this request) ff Date: �11 6 — / / pa i I request an amendment to the / / / budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account-#- o i- /s � • 5i/3 Amendment Account Name ---Amount --- ------ ---- ffaoo .ao —/006.0C -------Reason Net change in total budget for this department is: $ 0 Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: I n 4 1 n 11 Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • 771 1992 - HEARING ON PROPOSED TAX INCREASE -NOTICE- TAX RATE A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried, that a Public Hearing on the Proposed Tax Increase on September 16, 1991 at 10:00 A.M.-Meeting to Adopt the Tax Rate- and to.authorize publication of "Notice of Vote on Tax Rate". DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 3- APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONER • A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk, and carried that Nathan Wooldridge be appointed to fill the vacancy of Olan Pendergrass as Commissioner of Drainage District # 3. MAGNOLIA BEACH WASTEWATER SYSTEM - PHASE II A motion was made by Commissioenr Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried , that the contract be awarded to the low bidder of McKinney Construction, Victoria,Texas on the recommendation of Testengeer, Inc. the engineer of the project, and authorized the County Judge to sign said contract. (Signed contract 10-14-91 minutes. ti W J J W rZ LU _ zz O W O m F yzaW g Q4J U) m 3 1 O a Z a Z U) y � m U N Za O Z U . O 0 N 0 n 0 o 0 r O v w o 0 0 0 0 o In o 0 o Q n _ � N n W ooi c� o ovi o000 000 n Z � N N V rn � N r o N N O n N N O [7 o O v (D [O Ol LQ O C Vl 0 N N 16 N (7 N O N W N [7 f n c m -- > m a N > T N Q y N ~ L Z L lL LL LL LL LL Q Q Q Q Y LL LL 0 J J J J J \ W W W W (l1 W J J (y ,7 C O ^ O O O O O O O O O O O O W V R Ol N C] O O O O O O (7 O N 01 N [O .- V W Z m � O d a _ c o O o UI on N o MQt m N O O o O O O N O O O O. F' Z W W N O 1(t N N N m (p In N N N O N O O O 1 O V W � W t O O O O 0 O n 7 O c7 O 1D W i0 (D cO V m I� N W N 01 N N O p. H O N O [") N M N O N '^ O % J Q Q a LL Y Q LL LL L) J J J J J W W W` Q W J \ t� } d oln lno in o 00 00000 0 R W c0 'C O N [O R O O O O O O (7 N q Z E J a Z - N N m Y m Zm O a N O o T O N O O o N O N O O O O O coO O O O O O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O n Z L Z ^N O O N O M M N N r Q N O O V No 0 0 D 0 O 0 O O1 (O O N h c7 R Ifl N N N N m Q [7 N N ♦- pt N M N lV O N rL O cV U m a w W n r, �h ? x LL LL LL LL LL LL Q Q Q LL} Q LL LL m J_ l \ J_ J_ W_ W 0 o [7 O O q O w o < O O o O O O O O O Vl o O O O O fU O O a y W (O m N 6 O W N O1 O W at fN 01-a n�i� �� M Q (0m O O a Q LL} Q LL IL F F W W W J WW J J mm N m N c7 N jN Ci V Q N O W E cU N U J O O O Z W O U m: V m A U C N U Q N U C W J ID O (y. ca tl o U �U oQ cd m y;0: E om,d c L Owsy NU Qrm- maoam co o n 0 r L • `7'72 • BID TABULATION SHEET CALHOUN COUNTY WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS MAGNOLIA BEACH Bids were received in the office of PHASE TWO Calhoun County Commissioners Court �t in-nnnm Friday. August 30. 1991. BIDDERS DAVIS PLUMBING COMPANY McKINNEY CONSTRUCTION MERCER CONSTRUCTION ITEM P 0 Box 44 512-275-5721 P O Box 3961 512-5764111 P O Drawer 512-782-7163 Cuero, Texas 77954 Victoria, Texas 77903 Edna, Texas 77957 ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM #1 YES YES YES ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM#2 YES YES YES BID BOND 5% YES YES COST OF MATERIALS FAP�PROX. INCLUDED $100,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Page 2 'Not specked material. "Limits number of connections at each residence 10 two. Bid item (1) also gaulifies by all lines of whatever size @ $7.50/1-F. ft W MAGNOLIA BEACH PHASE TWO Lw.wo.00 $30,DDD.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 1 i i 7=====*= i i i � i i i i I i (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) 0) (k) (1) (m) (n) (0) (p) — DAVIS PLUMBING CO. McKINNEY CONST. MERCER CONST. • GUADALUPE BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY -FIRE WATER SERVICE -AGREEMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the agreement with GBRA be approved with corrections that Calhoun County pay for water supply and to select Alternate #2 for Hillcrest Subd., and authorize County Judge to sign the agreement when correctinos are made to the expense for same be paid out of the General Fund and the General Fund Budget for 1991 be amended accordingly. (See Vol. 10_PA& e [!J-S -ror l aNTRACT� APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner • Hahn and carr' d that the minutes of June 10, 14, 24, July 8, 11, 22, 23, 29, and 31 t b approved. 0 u., I, L4e'ryBeV, C nissioner,Pct. Ttan ey M a ommissloner,Pct.2 ar ne Paul, County Clerk dscar F. Sa om &i,-,erPc1:.4 UTILITY EASEMENT - GTE -PCT. 2 Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that a permit be granted to General Telephone Co. to bury cable in Pct. 2 at the following location and authorize the County Judge to sign. tic eon6N Eo"ns In Ev.1.on GTE Southwest NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION INSTALLATION • Incorporated LINE DATE 08-20-91 TO THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF — _C-HOUN _ _ COUNTY ATTENTION COUNTY JUDGE: Alex llcrnandcz Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Formal nor ice is hereby given Ih it GTE SOUTI IWEST" INCORPORATED will construct a cornmunicalion line within the right-of-way of a Coady Road in ___— — CALIIOl1N— County, PORT LAVACA, TEXAS as [allows: GTE proposes to extend buried cable along. Weslund Grade Road. 'the proposed cable will begin 671' southeast of the intersection with MClkxnald Road. It will extend for 665' at 3.5' inside the northeast right -or -way. All cable will be plowed or trenched to a mininnnn depth of 30". SEE AITACIIED SMIU1. The location and description of this line and associated appurtenances is more fully shown • by three 13) copies of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the County Road right-of-way in accordance with governing laws. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is expressly understood that lender of this notice by the GTE Southwest Incorporated does not constitute a waiver, surrender, abandonment or impairment of any property rights, hanchise, easement, license, authority, permission, privilege or right now granted by law or may be granted in the future and any provision or provisions so construed shall be null and void. Construction of this line will begin on or after _- August 2G, 1911— GTE SOUTIIT INCORPORA ED By _ �""�/...� SFN10R ENGINEER - OSP Address �.:��RIYORII.TIIIIII!I 517/7n7-rn77 7'75 • CONCURRED TO: GTE SOUTRWEST INCORPORATED ATTENTION: DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 The Commissioner's Court of CALHOUN County offers no objections to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed buried communications line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated 08-20-91 except as noted below. It is further intended that the Commissioner's Court may require the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30) • days written notice. The installation shall not damage any part of the County Road and adjacent property owners. Please notify Stanley Mikula , telephone 552-9656 Commissioner of Precinct No. Two , forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line, in order that we may have a representative present. Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County, Texas, acting herein by and through the County Judge and all the Commissioners pursuant to resolution passed on the day of , 19 _, and duly recorded in the Minute Book of the Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County, Texas. s C61UNATY JU E • 776 O CN7 Y LUNG r`IL L Aeu v✓u �.or,� i TAX c,er. na+n er P // `� 7- !/S —x- i 0 me 600664 EU 1721REV.1 661 ® Southwest PfXT LAIC If Tx „� Cot-/✓`Y �i /F/fAT/!•N _ 777 FAIRGROUNDS- USE BY PILOT CLUB FOR CIRCUS A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk, and carried that the Court allow the Pilot Club to use the fairgrounds for a circus April loth, pending the receipt of certificate of insurance showing as additional insured- Calhoun County, the County Judge, each Commissioner and the Pilot Club . WAR II COMRADES -ADDITION OF C.R. BROWN NAME A motion was made by Judge Hartzog, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried, that the name of C. R. Brown be added to the list of the fallen comrades of World War II on the face of the Court- house. LATERAL ROAD ACCOUNT -REFUND A Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the Lateral Road Report be approved subject to the Auditor's presentation. f Cl J �O W m m m m .O .l- Q ' < N U v �c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'V LL l 1 Z yf v. c c o / 1 i a v -.o— -- ci. o 0 o o.o q .1 O N W O O N 0 0 0 v ? a o � J � u a E y ` a Ya` • • v • • THE COURT RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT THE WAGON TRAIN. HISTORICAL HELEN J. SMITH WAS PRESENT FOR THE AFTERNOON SES - MUSEUM Marion Rhodes appeared before the Court requesting help in moving the large fixtures and other items from the Courthouse Annex into the old library building where the Museum will now be housed. The Commissioners agreed to furnish trucks and manpower for the move on September 16th at 8:00 A.M. REDISTRICTING -ADOPTION OF PLAN A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried, that the Court accept the recommendation of Citizen's Committee on Redistricting to redistrict the County Commissioners' Precincts, the Justice of the Peace and Constable Precincts and adopt Plan No. 8. Commissioner Mikula and Judge Hartzog abstained. A statement was made by Commissioner Mikula that he was not opposed to the Citizen's Committee's recommendation but he thought in view of the comments heard at the Public hearing that perhaps they could receive more input from the minority community, realizing also though, that once Plan 8 is submitted to the Justice Dept.that the minority community could still have input thereafter. Judge Hartzog also stated he was abstaining for much the same reason, but also as County Judge he runs County wide. Commissioners Belk, Hahn and Smith voting for Plan 8 and Commissioner Mikula and Judge Hartzog abstaining. THE COURT RECESSED UNTIL FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1991.. 779 REGULAR SEPTEMBER TERM HELD SEPTEMBER 13, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 13th day of September, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Pct. 1 • Leroy Belk Commissioner, Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Commissioner Mikula gave the Invocation and Judge Hartzog led the Pledge of Allegiance. BUDGET AMENDMENTS - SHERIFF -JAIL -PRECINCT NO. 4 6 PARKS DEPT. 1991 A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the following Budget Amendments for 1991 be approved: [BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: 1 AA1 �� �)l 0 (Dep tment making this request) Date: VI -lo-qI • I request an amendment to the �'11I�— budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment Account Name Amount --Reason - OL Aocount X ----- / -----_ `--05 ��0�1500 01_gI 10-T110 111 1!ti)o A 50 q(po (JI f5U0- b5 l` Qs uc _Rko0 o i�o - tfe,10 0)- 15l0- lu5ll `�— Net eKahge in total liudFjet for this department is: $ n other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until • Commissioners' Court approval is obtained• signature of official/department head: I^)-, k6- 00 Wf P� °"'o Date of Commissioners' Court approval: —1f4jo++ram--��- 7� Date posted to General Ledger account(s): SEv i 319y1 780 • • BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (Department making this request) Date: I)_i`mi I request an amendment to the / budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account_#_ Amendment Account Name ___Amount ' u_.�i i ► Ir... ' 1W� Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): p pp O SEP 1 31991 781 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court • From:PM" he l (Depart ent making this request) Date: q ) ").). q I request an amendment to the f9 budget for the following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account-#- Account Name Amount Reason d d-o 0 s4BNet change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): in. P p °� SEP 1 31991 C 782 AND PROPOSALS - PICK-UP TRUCK -PRECINCT NO.1 After review of bids opened August 30, 1991 a Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the low bid of Main, Port Lavaca, Texas, in the amount of $13,644.97 for a 1992 Dodge D150 Regular Cab pick-up be accepted. AGREEMENT -ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS fi CALHOUN COUNTY • TITLE IV-D PROGRAM A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court approve the Contract for Title IV -Program between the Attorney General, State of Texas and Calhoun County. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR TITLE IV-D PROGRAM BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF TEXAS AND CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN SECTION I. PARTIES This agreement is made and entered into by and between the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "Attorney General", and the County of CALHOUN, Texas, hereinafter referred to,as "County". The parties hereto have severally and collectively agreed and by the execution hereof are bound to the mutual obligations and to performance and accomplishment of the tasks hereinafter described. • SECTION 2. AGREEMENT PERIOD This agreement shall commence September 1, 1991, and shall terminate August 31, 1993, unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions of Section 10 of this agreement. SECTION 3. AUTHORITY AND REPRESENTATIONS Attorney General, as the state agency designated by Chapter 76 of the Texas Human Resources Code to administer a statewide plan for child support enforcement in compliance with Title IV, Part D, of the federal Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, hereinafter referred to as Tide IV-D", and the regulations promulgated thereunder, seeks to obtain the performances contemplated of County by this agreement as a means of meeting certain requirements of federal and state law pertaining to the administration of such child support enforcement program. County may be required by state law to provide services and performances in a suit affecting the parent -child relationship under Title IV-D, TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. Title 2 (Vernon 1990) including a suit to establish paternity, a suit to establish a child support obligation, a motion to enforce or modify a decree, or a notice of child support delinquency, or in a suit under TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. Ch. 21 (Vernon 1990), and may be partially reimbursed for such services as provided in House Bill 202, Regular Session, 72nd Legislature, hereinafter referred to as "H.B. 202". SECTION 4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The performances called for in this agreement shall be rendered strictly in accordance with the applicable provisions of Title IV-D and the rules and regulations of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, hereinafter referred to as "DHHS". Such provisions include, but are not limited to, Part 300 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations and other applicable federal regulations relating to the child support program. In accordance with 45 CFR 303.107, standards of performance must meet federal requirements, and are those specified by this agreement and in H.B. 202, which enumerate the performances County is to provide In return for the payment of fees by Attorney General to • the extent specified by H.B. 202 and federal law. Financial arrangements include budget estimates, which have been made on a statewide basis for agreements of this type by the Attorney Geaeral; covered expenditures, which are specified by H.B. 202; and methods of determining charges and procedures for billing, which are specified by Subsection C of Section 6 and other provisions of this agreement together with the forms and instructions provided hereunder. The beginning and ending dates of this agreement, conditions for revision or renewal and termination provisions are set forth herein. Payments for services purchased by the Attorney General from County under this agreement must be in accordance with rates of payment which do not exceed the amounts reasonable and necessary to assure the quality of such services and the charges reasonably assignable to such services. The charges or amounts set forth in H.B. 202 represent less than, or no more than, the actual costs expended by the County in performing services for which the Attorney General is liable under this agreement. In no event shall County charges exceed actual costa of performances required pursuant to H.H. 202 and this agreement. 78t.1 • SECTION S. COUNTY PERFORMANCE A. GENERAL - County shall carry out certain duties provided by state law regarding the filing, service of process and the issuance of subpoenas, writs and orders in actions tiled in conducting a statewide program of child support enforcement pursuant to Title IV-D. County shall provide Attorney General all the performances for which fees are listed in TEX. GOVT. CODE ANN., Section 51 (Vernon 1990). B. ENUMERATED FUNCTIONS County shall provide such performances as may be necessary and appropriate to fulfill its obligations pursuant to Subsection A of this Section 5 including, but not limited to, the following enumerated functions: 1. filing and processing actions in suits affecting the parent -child relationship (SAPCR) under Title 2, Texas Family Code, including a suit to establish paternity, a motion to enforce or modify a decree or a potice of child support delinquency, and a suit under Chapter 21, Texas Family Code; and 2. the issuance of service of process; and 3. the issuance of writs, orders and subpoenas as specified in H.B. 202; and 4. filing and processing transfer cases under Section 11.06(1) of the Texas Family Code; and 5. the issuance of orders and writs of income withholding as provided by Sections 14.43 and 14.45 of the Texas Family Code. • SECTION 6. ATTORNEY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS (FINANCIAL) A. MEASURE OF LIABILITY In consideration of full, satisfactory and timely performance hereunder, Attorney General shall be Gable to County as specified by this Subsection, subject to the limitations set forth in Subsection C of this Section 6, and further subject to the reduction of liability for credits pursuant to Subsection B of this Section 6. 1. Attorney General shall be liable to County in an amount equal to the applicable reimbursement rate (which is sixty-six percent at the signing of this agreement) multiplied by the total permissible amount of charges as speed by Section 5 of H.B. 202 for services or performances provided by County, such charges representing no more than the actual costs incurred by County in performing Title IV-D services payable under H,H. 2n 2. Attorney General shall be liable to County in an amount equal to the state share of the charges by which the applicable reimbursement rate is multiplied pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Subsection. (It is noted that this Paragraph 2 will not operate to create additional liability on the part of the Attorney General until appropriations in addition to those in effect on the beginning date of this agreement have been made.) 3. The term, "applicable reimbursement rate, shall mean that fractional proportion of allowable child support enforcement program charges for which the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement may and will make payment as federal financial participation (FFP) under federal law and regulations regarding the administration of the child support enforcement program. 4. The term, 'state shaie', means the difference between the total permissible charges by which the applicable reimbursement rate is multiplied pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Subsection and the liability of Attorney General pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Subsection. B. CREDITS • 1. If the County recovers direct payments from obligors specifically for services or performances rendered in a Tide IV-D child support case and for which Attorney General is liable or has made payment hereunder, then County shall credit such amounts to Attorney General on the billing to the Attorney General for the month during which such recovery a Page 2 of 6 Pages Ma is made. All such credits shall be described and documented as Attorney General may reasonably require. Except as further provided by this Paragraph, County shall either, at its option: a) reduce the total permissible charges by which the applicable reimbursement rate is multiplied • pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Subsection A of this Section 6 by the amount of such credits; or b) refund to Attorney General that amount of such credits for which the Attorney General is liable pursuant to Subsection A of this Section 6 or has made payment pursuant to Subsection D of this Section 6. In the event that the total of such credits exceeds the total permissible charges by which the applicable reimbursement rate is multiplied pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Subsection A of this Section 6, County shall refund to Attorney General that amount of such excess credits for which Attorney General has made, or is in the process of making, payment pursuant to Subsection D of this Section 6. 2. County is not required to credit sums pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Subsection B recovered from obligors for charges or fees for which Attorney General is not liable hereunder. C. LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY 1. It is expressly understood and agreed by the parties hereto that any and all of Attorney General's obligations hereunder are contingent upon the existence of a Slate Plan for child support enforcement approved by the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement providing for the statewide program of child support enforcement and upon a valid state appropriation statute. In the event that such a State Plan should lapse or otherwise terminate, Attorney General shall notify County within ten (10) days of such fact in writing and Attorney General shaft not be liable hereunder subsequent to County's receipt of such written notification, except that Attorney General shall be liable to County for any expenses incurred pursuant to this agreement for which Attorney General receives money from the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement. 2. Attorney General shall be liable pursuant to Subsection A of this Section 6 only for charges and fees becoming due after commencement of this agreement and before termination of this agreement. 3. Attorney General shall not be liable for any charges pursuant to Subsection A of this Section 6 incurred by • County of a type not described by, or in excess of, the amounts specified by Section 5 of H.B. 202. 4. Attorney General shall not be required to pay any ages incurred for performances rendered unless such charges are incurred and such performances arc rendered strictly in accordance with the terms of this agreement. County must certify that payments for performances do not exceed the reasonable and necessary expenditures assignable to such performances. 5. Attorney General shall not be liable for any County charges pursuant to Subsection A of this Section 6 billed by County which are submitted more than ninety (90) days following the end of the calendar month in which such charges became due. • 6. The Attorney General is liable to County pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Subsection A of this Section 6 for any charge only to the extent that the FFP is received by the Attorney General, and if an amount is paid by the Attorney General and that amount is disallowed by the federal government or the FFP is not otherwise received, the District Clerk, Sheriff or Constable to whom the payment was made shall return the amount to the Attorney General not later than the 30th day after the date on which notice to do so is given by Attorney General to County. 7. Attorney General shall be liable to County hereunder only to the extent that an appropriation or appropriations have been made to Attorney General expressly, specifically and exclusively for the purpose of meeting Attorney General's obligations to counties pursuant to Section 5 of H.B. 202. (It is noted that on the beginning date of this agreement an appropriation is made by Section 9 of H.B. 202 from which Attorney General may pay liabilities arising pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Subsection A of this Section 6, but no appropriation has been made from which Attorney General may pay any amounts pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Subsection A of this Section 6.) D. METHOD OF PAYMENT 1. Except as further provided by this Paragraph, for each calendar month during the period of performance of this agreement, County shall bill Attorney General for liabilities of Attorney General not previously billed by County and unpaid by Attorney General which have accrued pursuant to this Section. County shall bill Attorney General in the Page 3 of 6 Pages L 785 manner -and on the forms specified by Attorney General and shall provide such information and documentation as • Attorney General may reasonably require. The billing otherwise required by this Paragraph shall not be required for those calendar months during which no liabilities or credits as provided by this Section 6 are applicable, 2. County shall keep records as provided by this Section 6 and Section 9 of this agreement in substantiation of such billings. 3. Attorney General agrees that billings received within fifteen (15) days after the end of the calendar month for which such billings are made shall be reviewed and either: a) returned to County for correction or further information within fifteen (15) days of receipt of such billings; or b) processed and submitted to Comptroller for payment in accordance with state procedures for issuing state payments. 4. County shall submit monthly vouchers with the accompanying processing forms attached to Attorhey General. County shall furnish any other reports or information required by Attorney General or the federal government. 5. A District Clerk, Sheriff and/or Constable may submit monthly vouchers on behalf of County. 6. Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, it is expressly understoodand agreed by the parties hereto that Attorney General may, at its sole option and in its sole discretion, offset any amounts owing to County hereunder against any amount owing but unpaid by County to Attorney General arising from this or any other obligation between Attorney General and County. 7. In the event that a state appropriation from which Attorney General may pay all amounts pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Subsection A of this Section 6 does not exist (which is the case upon the beginning date of this agreement), the state share shall be met by certified public expenditure by the County through the District Clerk, Sheriff or Constable to the • extent the state share is not paid by Attorney General, and County shall certify such fact to Attorney General in such form as may be reasonably requested. E. EXCESS PAYMENTS County shall refund within thirty (30) days to Attorney General, any sum of money which has been paid to County which Attorney General determines has resulted in an overpayment to County. County shall be. solely responsible and Gable for settlement of all audit exceptions which may be taken by DHHS or by Attorney General. In the event that Attorney General makes a settlement with DHHS of audit exceptions for which County is liable or if County's expenses are not allowable under this agreement or federal regulations, County will pay to Attorney General the amounts so determined, provided that Attorney General shall give County timely notice of such exceptions. Attorney General may deduct amounts payable by County to Attorney General pursuant to this Paragraph from amounts payable by Attorney General pursuant to Subsection C of this Section 6. SECTION 7. FUNDS SECURITY County shalt insure that every person, who, as a part of his or her employment, receives, disburses, handles, or has access to funds collected pursuant to this agreement is covered by a bond against loss resulting from employee dishonesty. County further agrees to maintain methods of administration designed to assure that persons responsible for handling cash receipts and checks in payment for the fees for services for which Attorney General also may be charged pursuant to this agreement do not participate in accounting or operating functions which would permit them to conceal in the accounting records the misuse of those payments. Such methods of administration shall follow generally recognized accounting standards. SECTION 8. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS County and Attorney General expressly agree they shall comply with federal and state laws and will completely meet • obligations imposed by rules, regulations and law in carrying out the program of child support enforcement pursuant to H.B. 202; TEX. FAM. CODE, Section 14.13 (Vernon 1990, as amended) and Title IV-D. Page 4 of 6 Pages '7g6 SECTION 9. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY County agrees that no person shall on the ground of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, political affiliation or belief be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be subjected to discrimination under or be denied employment in the administration of, or in connection with, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this agreement. • SECTION 10. TERMINATION, CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS A. DISCRETIONARY TERMINATION Either of the parties to this agreement shall have the right, in such partiys sole discretion and at its sole option, to terminate this agreement by notifying the other party hereto in writing of such termination at least five (5) calendar days prior to the effective date of such termination. Such notice of termination shall state the effective date of such termination. B. REJECTION CHANGE Upon notification by County to Attorney General of Countys rejection of a change pursuant to this Section 10, this agreement shall terminate without further action by either party, such termination to be effective as of the date County sends its written rejection. C. CHANGES IN LAW Any alterations, additions or deletions to the terms of this agreement which are required by changes in state or federal law are automatically incorporated into this agreement without written amendment hereto, and shall be effective on the date designated by such state or federal law or other requirement, unless this agreement has been terminated prior to such date. D. CHANGES BY ATTORNEY GENERAL It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that this agreement must at all times be in compliance with state and federal law, and regulations and procedures set forth by Attorney General, and that changes, interpretations and clarifications of such state and federal law and Attorney General's regulations and procedures and other requirements made by DHHS during the agreement period will have the effect of qualifying the terms of this agreement. Based on these considerations, and in order to ensure the legal and effective performance of this agreement by both parties, it is agreed by the parties hereto that this agreement may be amended in the manner provided herein. Attorney General shall have the right to propose to County amendments hereto that relate to such compliance and performance. Attorney General shall furnish County written notice of all amendments proposed pursuant to this Subsection D. Upon such notice by Attorney General to County, an amendment proposed pursuant to this Subsection D shall be deemed accepted and effective immediately upon receipt by County, unless County notifies Attorney General in writing within five (5) calendar days of such receipt of its rejection of the proposed amendment, in which case this agreement will terminate in accordance with the provisions of Subsection B of this Section 10 of this agreement. Upon County's acceptance of the proposed amendment, such amendment becomes binding upon County and Attorney General as if written in this agreement. E. CONVENTIONAL AMENDMENT Except as specifically provided otherwise by this Section 10, any alterations, additions or deletions to the terms of this agreement shall be by amendment hereto in writing and executed by both parties to this agreement. SECTION 11. NOTICE A. GENERAL Any notice required or permitted to be given under this agreement by one party to the other party shall be in writing and shall be given and deemed to have been given immediately if delivered in person to the address set forth in this Section for the party to whom the notice is given, or on the date of certified receipt following mailing if placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, addressed to the party at the address hereinafter specified. • Page 5 of 6 Pages '787 B. ATTORNEY GENERAL ADDRESS 1. AB monthly vouchers with IV-D Child Support Court Costs Processing Forms attached, or forms previously approved by Attorney General, shall be mailed to the Office of the Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement Division, litigation, P.O. Box 12017, Austin, Texas 79711-2017, Art: Child Support Court Costa. 2. Notices for early termination or for any purpose not specifically provided herein shall be mailed to General Counsel of Child Support Enforcement Division, Office of the Attorney General, P.O. Box IW17, Austin, Texas 78711- 2017, Att.: Court Costs Agreement. C. COUNTY ADDRESS The address of County for all purposes under this agreement and for all notices hereunder shall be: THE HONORABLE HOWARD G. HARTZOG COUNTYJUDGE COURTHOUSE PORT LAVACA, TX 7" D. ADDRESS CHANGES Either party may change the address to which notice is mailed hereunder by providing written notice of such change to the other party. The change of address shall become effective for purposes of this Section upon receipt of such notice by such other party. SECTION 12. VENUE • This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. The venue • of any suit brought for any breach of this agreement is fixed in any court of competent jurisdiction in Travis County, Texas, and all payments shall be due and payable in Travis County. WITNESS OUR HANDS EFFECTIVE THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1991. THE HONORABLE DAN MORALES ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS by. MARY F. KELLER DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL CALHOUN COUNTY STATE OF TF-W M Page 6 of 6 Pages 788 • AMENDMENT NO. 1 - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CALHOUN COUNTY AND GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that the Court approve the Amendment No. 1 to Interlocal Agreement between Calhoun County and The Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CALHOUN COUNTY AND THE GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION The following changes in the basic Interlocal Agreement (dated March 15, 1991) between Calhoun County and the Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission for services in connection with the County's Texas Community Development Program grant, are mutually agreed to: 1) Section 4. Compensation and Method of Payment. The maximum amount of compensation and reimbursement to be paid hereunder shall not exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5.000.00). Payment to GCRPC shall be based on satisfactory completion of identified milestones in Part III - Payment Schedule of this contract: • Part III - Payment Schedule shall state: The County of Calhoun shall reimburse the Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission for management services provided for completion of the following project milestones per the following maximum contract amount: 1) Establish and maintain recordkeeping system (project management) $ 750.00 2) Completion of Environmental/Special Conditions Clearance $1,250.00 3) Completion of Bid/Contract Award Process (project management) . $1,250.00 4) Completion of Labor Standards Compliance $ 750.00 5) Completion of all Close-out Reports $ 500.00 6) Quarterly Progress Reports/MBE Reports $ 500.00 TOTAL $5,000.00 In the event of contract termination, payment shall be rendered for services performed • on a pro rats basis. The County is responsible for payment of the audit for this project. 789 2. All other terms and conditions of the basic Interlocal Agreement shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS, whereof, the Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission and the County of Calhoun, Texas have executed this Amendment as of this 9th_ day of September , 1991. • CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Patrick J. Kennedy Executive Director • GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION -APPOINT MEMBERS A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Court recommend the following persons to the Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission to serve on • the following committees: Public Protection Committee- Kenneth Bowden to replace Rick Brush. Solid Waste Committee --Add the name of Patricia Kimball to the committee. EMS 911-Advisory Committee- Commissioner Stanley Mikula to replace Bobbie Grims, and to the Area Advisory Council on Aging- Commissioner Oscar Hahn to replace Rev. Jack Fellers. TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT The Tax Assessor - Col'slector presented her monthly report for July and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and and carried that said report be approved. 790 COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT • The County Treasurer presented her monthly report and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said report be approved. BUDGET AMENDMENT -SHERIFF'S DEPT. A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following Budget Amendment be approved. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun 11County Commissioners' Court From: �.YI1.P.4xGIJ . Department making this request) Date: I 1 I ,q I I request an amendment to the I9 CII budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -#- - Account -Name -- ---Amount-- -- ---__--Reason ------ ----------- I�I �16�10�1105 �twSY4. • 0\-g6g0-q�q0 01- ghlgn- 1- 0' qq `if u,,dicmo 100 tll—oIon- _-�163 cam— 0 0 Oi—�15y0—�101 '�' IIa00 Net change in total budget for this department is: g L Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. I • Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: 9— Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 791 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY Claims totaling $829,930.39 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL Claims totaling $2,125.96 were presented by the County Auditor for the Hospital Indigent Healthcare Fund and after reading and verifying same a Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. THE COURT ADJOURNED. SPECIAL SEPTEMBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN' [ HELD SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 16th day of September, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to wit: , Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pet. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ORDER SETTING TAX RATE & LEVYING TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1991 A motion was made by Commmissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Court adopt the following Order setting Tax Rate and Levying Taxes and set the 1991 Tax Rate at $0.3500. • • 792 • Upon motion by Commissioner%�v�� , seconded by Commissioner 5_1+s17W , and carried, the following order was adopted and entered: ORDER SETTING TAX RATES AND LEVYING TAXES At a regular term of the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, held on this 16th day of September, 1991, there having come for hearing the matter of levying the ad valorem tax for Calhoun County, Texas, in connection with the 1991 tax roll, and the setting of the rates therefor, and it appearing to the Court that the County budget for Calhoun County, Texas, for the year 1992 was officially adopted by the Court at a term thereof held on the 9th day of September, 1991; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS: Section 1. that the following rates of tax be, and they are hereby levied on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of taxable property in Calhoun County, Texas, as the same appears on the 1991 tax roll, these tax rates having been included in the 1992 County budget heretofore adopted by this Court: COUNTY TAX General Fund $ 0.1890 Road and Bridge Fund $ 0.0645 Farm to Market and Lateral Road Fund $ 0.0300 Debt Service Fund $ 0.0675 TOTAL COUNTY -WIDE TAX RATE $ 0.3500 PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of September, 1991. COMMISSIONER URT OF A UN COUNTY, TEXAS By Howar G Hatt/ g, my Judge ATTEST: l) j Gt V4t'e., Vl�� arVene Paul, Count C er THE COURT ADJOURNED. M • SPECIAL SEPTEMBER TERM HELD SEPTEMBER 25, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I i COUNTY OF CALHOUN I BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 25th day of September, A.D., 1991 there was begun and holden at the Courthouse.in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 1:00 P.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State and thee were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Marlene Paul County Clerk LEROY BELK, Commissioner of Pct. land OSCAR F. HAHN, Commissioner of Pct. 4 were absent only due to the illness of • their wives. The Court expresses wishes for a speedy recovery. whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PLAN OF REDISTRICTING Commissioner Mikula stated that as much as our action today in approving the Resolution is that we are carrying out action of the majority of the Commissioners' court that was taken on September 9th, 1991 which was that the Court would submit Plan No. 8 as the redistrict plan, and well as that it was a recommendation of the Advisory Committee; and that if action was not taken today the Court would not be able to meet the October 2nd deadline;for submission to the Justice Department. A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the following Resolution be adopted. _ • 794 • MINUTES OF A CALLED SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COMMISSIONERS' COURT OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS On this, the 25th day of September, 1991, at 1:00 o'clock P. M., the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County, Texas, met in a properly called and posted public session in the Commissioners' Court meeting room of the County Courthouse, with the County Judge and two Commissioners present and voting, pursuant to statutory notice and call, and after having given and posted the required public notice for more than seventy- two (72) hours prior to said meeting, as required by the Texas Open Meeting Law, for the announced purpose of adopting a resolution pertaining to the redistricting of the Commissioner's Precincts, the Justice of the Peace and Constable Precincts, and changes to the Election Precincts and polling places. THEREUPON, upon motion duly made and seconded, the following RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PLAN OF REDISTRICTING was passed and adopted. • RESOLVED, that as the Commissioners' Court, we, subject to the final approval hereof by the Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Amendments of 1975, redistrict and redefine the Commis- sioners' Precincts as shown by the maps and legal de- scription attached hereto, and we do hereby ADOPT the plan and division set forth on the PLAN OF REDISTRICTING set forth herein verbatim, evidenced by the maps and legal description comprising "EXHIBIT A". This redistricting and these new boundaries are to become formally effective on January 2, 1992 and will be used as the basis for conducting the primary elections in March of 1992, and the general election in November of 1992. The Commissioners' Court therefore instructs its attorneys, David Guinn and Michael Morrison, to submit said redistricting plan for approval to the Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for preclearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended in 1975 and 1982. Such approval, when and if made by the Justice Department, should be noted in the Minutes of this Commissioners' Court by the County Judge. . C J In order for the redistricting plan to be made effective, it is necessary that the boundaries of the existing voting precincts be redefined so as to comport to the new Commissioners' Court Precinct boundaries. The redefinition of boundaries is evidenced in Commissioners' "EXHIBIT B"t the same being a map of the new voting precincts with the location of each polling station being clearly marked thereon, and the boundaries of the voting precincts also being clearly marked; said boundaries of the new voting precincts being more specifically defined in the legal description attached as "EXHIBIT Cl; said "EXHIBITS B AND C" being expressly incorporated into this Resolution and made a part of the same for all purposes. Additionally, the Commissioners' Court does hereby, as a part of this Resolution, pursuant to the authority vested it by the Texas Constitution, Article 5, Section 18, include the following changes in the Justice of the Peace and Constable Precincts to wit: (1) Five (5) Justice of the Peace and Constable Precincts (2) Legal Description - see "EXHIBIT E" (3) Voting Precincts for each by number: redefinition of Justice and Constable boundaries is evidenced in Commissioner's "EXHIBIT D", same being a map of new Justice and Constable Precincts and the boundaries of the voting precincts for same; said boundaries of new Justice and Constable precincts being set out by legal description attached as "EXHIBIT E"; said "EXHIBITS D AND E" being expressly incorporated into this Resolution and made a part of same for all purposes. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS RESOLUTION ARE AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT A: Proposed New Commissioners' Precinct Maps EXHIBIT B: Proposed Election Precinct Maps with Polling Places Marked EXHIBIT C: Legal Description of Proposed Election Precincts and Street Address of Polling Place EXHIBIT D: Proposed Justice Precinct Maps (see Exhibit A) • • 0 R (5) EXHIBIT E: Legal DescriQtion of Proposed Justice Precincts Announcements were made as required by law, and uVon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously passed, this meeting of the Commissioners, Court was ended without the transaction of any further business other than that shown by the foregoing Minutes. SIGNED this 25th day of September, 1991. Howar Ha Calhoqfi County, (seal) ATTEST: 01 "tt Marlene Paul, County C er , Calhoun County, Texas is A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Smith andcarried that the meeting be adjourned. THE COURT ADJOURNED. is i 97 SPECIAL SEPTEMBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF CALHOUN I HELD SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 30th day of September, A.D. 1991 there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M. a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Opal M. Hayes . County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 isCommissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 Deputy County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. BIDS AND PROPOSALS -MEMORIAL MEDICAL FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the bids opening for furniture and equipment for Memorial Medical Center be postponed until October 14, and the bids be awarded on October 21st and the motion carried. Some bidders had complained they had not had sufficient time and there were only a few bids submitted. BIDS AND PROPOSALS -FUEL FOR OCTOBER Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Court award the bid for fuel for the month of October to the low bidder, Diebel Oil Co. FUEL BID PROPOSAL �J IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ e ( 5�g X 2800 = $ (?q 2.`6 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ r7,j g5/X 3000 = $ ?;t%LF, dU DIESEL FUEL $ jo g X 2500 = $ /boo m TOTAL BID PRICE $ 7(6.go THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. " SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. •E OF BIDDER: ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE • Oil c). . %0. 30Y 71 Port m L 799 • FUEL BID PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE $ A o"/ X 2800 = q $ /9P5 ZO PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ . 7S4 X 3000 = $cgx,)-.L,)O DIESEL FUEL $ . 6 9Z X 2500 = $%3O.0o TOTAL BID PRICE $ THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. • NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER �ANF70o, T, /x�9s 7r7962 SS.2- %OOP( AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: �/Y( TITLE DATE 9':�O -Cyy 0 ME BIDS & PROPOSALS- PRECINCT ONE • Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for bids for a utility tractor for Precinct One . Bids to be opened October 31, 1991. CONTRACTURAL AGREEMENT - 24TH JUDICIAL COMMUNITY SUPERVISION,ETC. Consideration of the Contractural Agreement between Calhoun County and 24th Judicial District Community Supervision and Corrections Department Community Service Restitution Program be tabled until another date. PERMANENT SCHOOL FUNDS A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the County Auditor be authorized to transfer all permanent school funds to Calhoun County Ind.School District in accordance with Art. 7, Sec. 6B,Texas Constitution. UTILITY EASEMENT -GTE - PCT. 4 Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that a permit be granted to General Telephone Company to bury cable in Pct. 4, along county right of way. MC 600647 ED-105 (DEV.1-88) ® GTE Southwest NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION Incorporated LINE INSTALLATION TO THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF DATE 09-16-91 CALHOUN COUNTY ATTENTION COUNTY JUDGE: Haeard G. Hartzog Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Formal notice is hereby given that GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED will construct a communication line within the right-of-way of a County Road in CALHOUN County, SEADRIFT, TEXAS as follows: GTE proposes to extend buried cable dean Shafer Road. The proposed cable will begin at Hwy 185, and will be extended for 1577' to an aerial insert over a drainage ditch. A new aerial insert will be placed. The cable will again go buried and will be extended for 2971' to the intersection with John Tillery Road. All proposed cable will be plowed or trenched into place at 3.5' inside the northwest right of way and will be placed at a minimum depth of 30". See Attached Sketch. The location and description of this line and associated appurtenances is more fully shown by three (3) copies of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the County Road right-of-way in accordance with governing laws. • Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is expressly understood that tender of this notice by the GTE Southwest Incorporated does not constitute a waiver, surrender, abandonment or impairment of any property rights, franchise, easement, license, authority, permission, privilege or right now granted by law or may be granted in the future and any provision or provisions so construed shall be null and void. Construction of this line will begin on or after qeptember 91 1991 GTE SOUT E TINCO CRATED By DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP Address P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTCM TEXAS 78380 512/387-6037 8A1 CONCURRED TO: GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED ATTENTION: DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP P. O. BOX 1112 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 The Commissioner's Court of CALIIOUN County offers no objections to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed burled communications line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated September 16, 1991 except as noted below. It is further intended that the Commissioner's Court may require the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30 days written notice. The installation shall not damage any part of the County Road and adjacent property owners. Oscar F. Hahn 785-3141 Please notify telephone Commissioner of Precinct No. 4 ,.forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line, in order that we may have a representative present. Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County, Texas, acting herein by and through the County Judge and all the Commissioners pursuant to resolution passed on the 30th day of SEptember 19 91 , and duly recorded in the Minute Book of the Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County, Texas. CO TY JUDGE-> 0- • • • I —EXISTING CI L.E A %�.(/O&kZ- -D C1113LC PLOtJE'D /l-r 3 z ' IJEsT klOZJ. MC 600664 ciy \ ED 1/2(REV.1-00) AREA ��(� / )T ® Sout hw �e st �}/ TAX DIET. LOCATION C /7 �/T �/ cnDnD BALL v DArE"��--DEscRiPrroN r�/1100/t/�O �/{ DRAWN BY. c I1U;SN DATE r` '2_3 9lf5mro Cmi E. APPROVED BY DA1T n,/ t REVISED BY DATE SCALE//,V� SHEET I Of MC 600547 EC-135 (eEVA-88) ® GTE Southwest NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION Incorporated LINE INSTALLATION DATE 09-16-91 TO THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF;OUN COUNTY ATTENTION COUNTY JUDGE: Howard G. Hartzog Calhoun County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Formal notice is hereby given that GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED will construct a communication line within the right-of-way of a County Road in CALHOUN County, SEADRIFT, TEXAS as follows: • GTE proposes to extend buried cable down Shafer Road. The proposed cable will begin at Hwy 185, and will be extended for 1577' to an aerial insert over a drainage ditch. A new aerial insert will be placed. The cable will again go buried and will be extended for 2971' to the intersection with John Tillery Road. All proposed cable will be plowed or. trenched into place at 3.5' inside the northwest • right of way and will be placed at a minimum depth of 30". See Attached Sketch. The location and description of this. line and associated appurtenances is more fully shown by three (3) copies of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the County Road right-of-way in accordance with governing laws. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is expressly understood that tender of this notice by the GTE Southwest Incorporated does not constitute a waiver, surrender, abandonment or impairment of any property rights, franchise, easement, license, authority, permission, privilege or right now granted by law or may be granted in the future and any provision or provisions so construed shall be null and void. Construction of this line will begin on or after--septembez 23, 1991—• GTE SOUT E TING, B RATE SENIOR ENGINEER - OSP Address P ROBSTOM, TEXAS 78380! 512/387-6037 • M ,• CONCURRED TO: GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED ATTENTION: DAVID J. CUSTER SENIOR ENGINEER-- OSP P. 0. BOX 1112 ROBSTOWN, TEXAS 78380 The Commissioner's Court of CALHOUN County offers no objections to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed buried communications line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated September 16; 1991 except as noted below. It is further intended that the Commissioner's Court may require the owner • to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30) days written notice. The installation shall not damage any part of the County Road and adjacent property owners. Please notify Oscar F.IHahn , telephone 785-3141 Commissioner of Precinct No. 4 forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line, in order that we may have a representative present. Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County, Texas, acting herein by and through the County Judge and all the Commissioners pursuant to resolution passed on the 30th day of 19 September 91 , and duly recorded in the Minute Book of the Commissioner's Court of Calhoun County, Texas. • 8�5 s e RESOLUTION - CITY OF CUERO -PRISON A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the Court adopt the Resolution concerning the construction of a prison in De Witt County. THE STATE OF TEXAS H IN THE COMMISSIONERS' COURT THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN H OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS: R E S O L U T I ON WHEREAS, the City of Cuero is filing a proposal to obtain a state prison in DeWitt County; and WHEREAS, the development of this project will have a major economic impact on our region; and WHEREAS, Calhoun County is concerned about economic development in our area and the jobs that will be opened for our residents and the residents of the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, Calhoun County supports the City of Cuero in their application for a state prison; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commissioners' Court of • Calhoun County, Texas does support the City of Cuero in their application and urges the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to approve the proposal of,,the City of Cuero for the location of a state prison. ADOPTED this 30th day of Se em r, 1991. How r G. Hart County Judge /eIG 74�;Q- k - Leroy Belk/ St nley ku a Commissioner, Pct, 1 Commis 'oner, Pct. 2 Helen Smith Commissioner,,Pct. 3 P o �,�L • Marlene Paul, County C1erk,Calhoun County,Tx. By eputy F� Hahn / Z Oscar Commissioner,,Pct. 4 cn . s -+ HV ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE ADVISORY COMMITTEE A motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that Judy O'Neil, Leslie Sanders and Ed Schearer to serve for one year term on the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Advisory Committee. POSTER CONTEST -NATIONAL 4-H CLUB WEEK The Commissioners and County Judge judged the poster contest for 4-H Club week. Posters will be displayed in the lobby of the Courthouse next week. • BUDGET AMENDMENT- FIRE HYDRANTS - FIRE PROTECTION- GENERAL A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the following Budget Amendment for GBRA fire hydrants . This was to clarify the amendment approved September 9, 1991, that did not have an amount. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County u��n��tty Commissioners' Court From: ykz 1 /I.�OL� —AIIA IaQ (Department making this request) Date: G-30 yl I request an amendment to the 1(I'I budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account --_Account Name _--Amount Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: Reason n� h,,A(t16A(I pQa �mtnr.c� isbF'�v Cd2A I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • no h 4� � 1 ,'m pjb A 30 �11 OV Ot1,s BUDGET AMENDMENTS- VARIOUS GENERAL FUND DEPTS.-UNEMPLOYMENT- EXTENSION SERVICE -SHERIFF -VETERAN S SERVICE - R fi B Pct. 2 DISTRICT CLERK- EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT -R & B prt_ 3 - FiuF A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the following budget amendment requests be approved. s BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (Department making this request) Date: q_aq-gl I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line itemsinmy department: �.It�' f SnCY�' Amendment (6I,A �- g950) ikMd GL Aee # - and Name ---Amount ------_Reason CJ • uo5 f566 d5 -(d qo InO5- 950 Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: S —p— I.understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained.. Signature of official/department head: �n�ih4olGlLLc � Date of Commissioners' Court approval: UV Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 8ti9 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court �From: b7y,, � `eAoJ u- (Department making this request) Date: G-16-9I I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount DI-7505-65,40 Ar.-" 0C..Mk1 )oo 01-iKoS 51n1 MKAa (IQ' 00UU Net change in total budget for this department is: $ ----------- Other remarks/justification: Reason ------ ------------ I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: �utiC� 4 Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • • • 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST • To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court . From: (Depar ment making this request) Date: q _ I I `l I I request an amendment to the M I budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account -Name Amount Of-q_5Yo-G523 • Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: S —Q_ % 0 1 I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Fu /1 Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • r BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST11 • To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: l/1lIl,MN "c A J ((fL (Department making this request) Date: q - 19 _9 ( I request an amendment to the �� 11 budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount 01-` aAL5 ) 01 o Net change in total budget for this department is: $ — Q ------------- Other remarks/justification: Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. signature of official/department head: �. Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • • 812 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: CalhounCountyCommiss�)ioners' Court • From: /�OUCI Q Y /1RU M(�- JW9 (Department Aaking this request) Date: q_� O-q I request an amendment to the MI budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account #_ 01-bw_-�&30 0�-�5on.-�5yol • Amendment Account Name Amount J"altmec-(let, (10,) "1�3 4- `y-Wlyl&,J o- Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Reason ------------------- I understand that my budget cannot be a s requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtain d. signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • t813 To: Calhoun County Auditor From: 4 1 r- , e_ A i (Department making this request) Date: cj.2.3—y1 I request an adjustment to the current budget for my department. The following transfers result in a net change of zero to the total budcret for expenditures by category (i.e., Supplies, Services, Capital outlay). Amendment GL Account # Account.Name Amount Reason Ol-zo-2S-62ai • Net change in total budget for this department is: $--- 0--- Other remarks/justification: I understand that this adjustment to my budget cannot be made without the approval of the County Judge.. Signature of official/department head: APPROVAL (SIGNATURE) OF COUNTY JUDGE: Date of approval: • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): r • 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners'Court From: e.110/t ac At cA.l..Tflji AI0gfAA0A7' (Depa tment making this request) Date: C1- 3o_cl I request an amendment to the ) budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount ------------- ------------------------------- "`ices' 1(0 q0 A(lG ) Net change in total budget for this department is:------------- $ Other remarks/justification: Reason ------------------- I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. II II__ �n1 (Jn Signature of official/department head: I_AnnhAOCI Lt-L lda�.t4n�/ro Date of Commissioners' Court approval: ° UV l� • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 815 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhh�QJ\un County Commissioners' Court From: (Department making this request) Date: A) _C11 I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount 0 Rhos-�110 � �g-x5o0-5yol Net change in total budget for this department is: — other remarks/justification: Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head:p Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • • • • J • • BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: V49XUM, -AMC (Department making this re est) Date: q-30 qI I request an amendment to the M fl budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -#- - --- Account -Name --- ---- Amount --_---_Reason ----------------- ------ (Of M)1 R- (I5� 01-q N 2-(gi ` �1llinuu0. } �onJ �700 Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: —W64 Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 817 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY • Claims totaling $329,569.81 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commmissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- HOSPITAL Claims totaling $403,771,93 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same a Motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. 4-H EXCHANGE TRIP TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Joe Surovik and members of the 4-H Club gave a slide presentattion on the 4-H Exchange trip to Washington state. Judge Hartzog thanked the members for sharing their experience with the Court. CLOSED SESSION -CONFER WITH ATTORNEY The Court being in open session in compliance with the pertinent • provisions of Art. 6252.17 of Texas Civil Statutes the County Judge as presiding officer publicly announced that a closed session would now be held under the provisions of Sec. 2e of said Art. 6252.17 for the purpose of conferring with the County's attorney. The County Judge further publicly announced that before any final action, decision or vote is made regarding the subject matter of said closed session, this meeting will be reopened to the public. The Court went into closed session. At the'end of, the closed session the meeting was reopened to the public but no final action, decision or vote with regard to any matter considered in the closed meeting was taken. THE COURT ADJOURNED. 0 SPECIAL OCTOBER TERM HELD OCTOBER 7; 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I I COUNTY OF CALHOUN • BE IT REMEMBERED,that on this the 7th day of October. A.D., 1991 there was begun and holden at the Courthouse,in the City of Port Lavaca, said County.and State, at 10:00 A.M.1 a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State and there were present on this date the following members of'" the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County .fudge Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct: 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioher, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk LEROY BELK Commissioner of Pct. 1, wAg abseht dtie to the illness of his wife. whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance, CLOSED SESSION -CONFER WITH ATTORNEY The Court being in open session in compliance with tie pertinent. • provisions of Art . 6252.17 of Texas Civil Statutes the County Judge as presiding officer publicly announced that a .closed.'1 session would now be held under the provisions of Sec+ 2e of said Art. 6252.17 for the purpose of conferring with the, County_'s attorney. The County Judge further publicly announced that before any final action, decision or vote is made regarding the subject matter of said closed session, this meeting will be reopened to the public. The Court then went into closed session at 10:02 A.M. At.the end of the closed session the meeting was reopened to the public and the following action was taken: DORORTILY CLAY VS. CHAMP TRAYLOR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Commissioner Mikula made the following motion: In the Cause No. 98-7-11,659, Dorothy Clay Vs. Champ Traylor Memorial Hospital, I move that the Commissioners' Court authorize the cottnty's legal counsel to settle the case of a sum payment of $50,000.00; also that the accrued medical bills at Memorial Medical Center in the amount of $2,854.25 owed by Dorothy Clay, be.forgiven; and in exchange for that settlement that the Plaintiff agree to an Order of Dismissal with Prejudice and execute the General Release and Covenant Not to Sue; that the County Judge be • authorized to sign the necessary legal documents; and that the funds be paid out of Memorial Medical Center funds. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried. THE COURT ADJOURNED. 819 REGULAR OCTOBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN I HELD OCTOBER 14, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 14th day of October, A.D, 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. GENERAL DISCUSSION OF COUNTY MATTERS - OYSTER SEASON Wiley Morgan and George Miller appeared before the Court to re- quest the backing of the Commissioners' Court as far as opening the bays to Oyster season and put the Court on notice and request the Court contact the Governor concerning the problems with the Health Dept. and let her know what it will cost the county if the bays are not opened. Wiley Morgan requested the Court declare the county a Disaster area because of the problems with the closing of the bays to oystering. The information was taken under advisement by the Court . No action was taken. BIDS & PROPOSALS- MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER -FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT Bids were opened and given to the hospital and the auditors office to consider the bids and come back October 31st with their recommendation and bids will be awarded at that time. • • • 820. v THE ���f�'! X-AAY COMPANY Dr TEXAS PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES - 3910 GASTON AVE. • DALLAS, TEXAS 75248 • (214) 8233330 .QUOTATION HOUSTON WACO AUSTIN EL PASO BAN ANTONIO FORT WORTH DALLAS LUOBOGN TYLER AMARILLO BEAUMONT WICHITA FALLS SAN ANGELO TOUR"NA MIDLAND BRYAN MCAUEN WESLACO PORT ARTHUR NACOGDOCHES HARLINGEN • SOLD TO: B H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. County Auditor, County County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 SHIP TO: Memorial Medical Center 815 North Virginia Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 DATE: September 27, 1991 SALESMAN: Watson Ell Ibert X-Ray Is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of ?_pages, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms stated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and conditions within 30 days. The prices staled herein are based on dellve of the Equip ment during the month of Au_g. 199�1 (Sea 8. (a), S (b) on reverse aide) QUANTITY and I DESCRIPTION I PRICE CATALOG NUMBER SYSTEM 625II Generator 600 mA 125 kVp Three Phase Quantamat AEC SCR Power Nodule RARC (High Speed Starter) High Tension Two Tube TransfLmfer • RFX 90/90 Radiographic/Fluaroscopic Table Base with Power Assist. Longitudinal Bucky Ion Chamber Director Bucky Grid Cassette Size Sensing Tray Patient Step Four Way Tabletop MX-100 Fluoroscopic Tube Unit with .6 x 1.2 mm Focal spot High Speed Cont. Page 2.... TERMS OF DELIVERY F.O.B. Port Lavaca, Texas TERMS OF PAYMENT 10 % Down Payment with Order 70% Payment Due Upon Shipment of Major Com- ponents of Equipment on the Order 20% Balance Upon First Use of Equipment FOR SPECIAL DESIGNED EQUIPMENT —SEE 2. (a) ON REVERSE SIDE. All payments are net 30 days from date of Invoice. CUSTOMER APPROVAL AS QUOTED. CUSTOMER SIGNATURE THE GILBERT X-RAY COMPANY OF TEXAS ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE �. 821 THE X-RAY COMPANY oe TEXAS n B.H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. Memorial Medical Center QUOTATION DATE: (Name of Customer) PAGE 2 OF September 27, 1991 UVANTITV and I DESCRIPTION CATALOG NUMBER PRICE 4 Way Shift Top RFX Model 88 Spotfilmer with: Ion Chamber Detector Grids Low Voltage Cables Lead Protection Apron Compression Cone Masking and all Electronics to RFX Table Model XT Radiographic Suspension with: New High Voltage Cables, 60 ft. (Pair) 12 ft. inboard mounted bridge Longitudinal Rails, 19 ft, (set of 2) Cable Drape Hardware Sentry III Automatic Collimation System MX-100 Radiographic Tube Unit with: .6 x 1.2 ran Focal spot 400,000 Heat Units High Speed New 9" Itmge System with: Thompson 9" Image Intensifier Teletron 8541 BX Vidiicon 14 Inch Ikegani Solid State Monitor Auto Brightness Stabilizer New High Voltage Cables 40ft. Vertical Cassette Holder with: Cassette Size Sensing Grid Quantanat Phototimer l.toil7Jiiti�a Net price includes freight to jab site. The equipment will be installed in room prepared to specifications to Gilbert X-Ray provided shop drawing. Warranty will be 6 months parts and 12 months labor. Used x-ray tub warranty is 6 months prorated. New image tube warranty is two year prorated. Special downpayment of 20%. Quote is good for 45 days. Delivery is 60 days after receipt of order. Price cannot be guaranteed for 8-1-92 delivery. Price plus Sales Tax if applicable ADDITIONAL TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE $145,000.00 • • • 822 _ MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER MR. JOHN HAYES. SEPTEMBER 25, 1991 QUOTATION WE ARE PLEASED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING QUOTATION ON A REMANUFACTURED GENERAL ELECTRIC RADIOGRAPHIC/FLUOROSCOPIC SYSTEM. 1 MST 625III GENERATOR WITH: -600MA -125KVP -THREE PHASE -QUANTAMAT AEC -SCR -POWER MODULE -RARC (HIGH SPEED STARTER) 1 HIGH TENSION TWO TUBE TRANSFORMER 1 RFX 90/90 RADIOGRPAHIC/FLUOROSCOPIC TABLE BASE WITH: -POWER ASSIST, LONGITUDINAL -BUCKY ION CHAMBER DETECTOR -BUCKY -GRID -CASSETTE SIZE SENSING TRAY -PATIENT STEP -FOUR WAY TABLE TOP 1 MX-100 FL FLUOROSCOPIC TUBE UNIT WITH: -.6 - 1.2 MM FOCAL SPOT -HIGH SPEED 1 2 OR 4 WAY SHIFT TOP 1 RFX MODEL 88 SPOTFILMER WITH: -ION CHAMBER DETECTOR -GRIDS -LOW VOLTAGE CABLES -LEAD PROTECTION APRON -COMPRESSION CONE -MASKING AND ALL ELECTRONICS TO RFX TABLE 1 MODEL XT RADIOGRAPHIC SUSPENSION WITH: -NEW HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES, 60 FT. (PAIR) -12 FT. INBOARD MOUNTED BRIDGE CUSTOMER INITIALS '823 1 4! -LONGITUDINAL RAILS, 19 FT. (SET OF 2) -CABLE DRAPE HARDWARE -SENTRY III AUTOMATIC COLLIMATION SYSTEM -MX-100 RADIOGRAPHIC TUBE UNIT WITH: -.6 - 1.2MM FOCAL SPOT -400,000 HEAT UNIT -HIGH SPEED 1 NEW 9" IMAGE SYSTEM WITH: -THOMPSON 9" IMAGE INTENSIFIER -TELETRON 8541 BX VIDICON -14 INCH IKEGAMI SOLID STATE MONITOR -AUTO BRIGHTNESS STABILIZER 1 NEW HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES 40 FT 1 VCH WITH: -CASSETTE SIZE SENSING -GRID -QUANTAMAT PHOTOTIMER MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER MR. JOHN HAYES. SEPTEMBER 25, 1991 PAGE 2 PRICE $139,900.00 ALL EQUIPMENT IS SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY PRIOR TO SALE. THE EQUIPMENT COVERED BY THIS QUOTATION INCLUDES THE QUOTED PRICE, REFU- BISHING, PREFIELD ASSEMBLY AND INSPECTION BY FACTORY TRAINED TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES, AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY PARTS AND LABOR. NOTE: AS PART OF A PROMOTIONAL EFFORT TO HAVE A REMANUFACTURED X-RAY SYSTEM TO DEMO IN YOUR AREA, WE WILL FURNISH YOUR HOSPITAL WITH A MV 4000 MOTORIZED X-RAY VIEWER VALUED AT $23,889.00 rI L $24 • IMAGING DIAGNOSTICS, INC 2702 DELMAR VICTORIA, TEXAS 77901 1-800-722-8909 October 11, 1991 Mr. B. H. Comiskey, Jr. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas Dear Mr. Comiskey, The following is our bid to supply DHHS Certified Refurbished Radiology Equipment for Memorial Hospital. The system we are quoting is as follows: • MST 625 II Generator RFX 90/90 Table with 4 way power assist top 88 spot film device XT suspension 6" video compact TE-21 closed circuit G.E. TV camera. Automatic brightness control through modulation of x-ray tube current. New solid state resolution monitor, new 6" Thomson-CSF series "F" image tube, new 1" separate mesh vidicon. Maxi -Ray 100 Rad and Fluoro tubes New 40 ft. fluoro and 60 ft. radiographic cables BASIC SYSTEM PRICE $123,250.00 OPTIONS: FL300 Image intensifier, automatic brightness through modulation of x-ray tube current and/or KV, automatic shutter limiter, digital display module, XT ceiling suspension system, used 9" image tube $7,250.00 New triple field 4.5", 6 9" Thomson-CSF series "F" image tube, new separate mesh vidicon $1 8,850.00 General Electric 105mm photo spot camera, 1-12 frames per second. individual frame phototiming accuracy down to 2 milliseconds. 400 frame film capacity for each of 2 cassettes, programming of blank frames during the film run and safety interlocks $5,800.00 • L-300 Pedestal mounted 9" image intensifier $21,750.00 040a 9" single field Thomson-CSF image tube with Syracuse TV camera pedestal mounted $24,650.00 9", 6" dual field Thomson-CSF image tube with Syracuse tv camera pedestal mounted $25,375.00 Phototimed Mullisize Vertical Cassette Holder $5,800.00 SYSTEM INCLUDES 1 YEAR PARTS, LABOR AND GLASSWARE WARRANTY, AND INSTALLATION. PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE SITE PREP OR DUCT WORK. DRAWINGS AND ROOM LAYOUT WILL BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF DOWN PAYMENT. TERMS: 50% DOWN PAYMENT UPON CONTRACT SIGNING 50%UPON DELIVERY Sincerely, Ross Schooler Sales Rep r1 u • 826 l� u • • IMAGING DIAGNOSTICS, INC 2702 DELMAR VICTORIA, TEXAS 77901 1-800-722-8909 MPX / RFX (USED) SYSTEM PRICING BASE SYSTEM $130,000.00 (INCLUDES PAINTING, TRIPLE FIELD (97 67 4"), L300 IMAGE SYSTEM AND 88 SPOT FILM DEVICE. ALSO INCLUDES 4-WAY FLOATING TOP.) NEW GLASSWARE 105 ROLL FILM CAMERA (10 FPS) ORDOGRAPH CHEST STAND, NO PHOTOTIMING CHEST STAND WITH PHOTOTIMING 1 YEAR WARRANTY $30,000.00 ( INCLUDES 2 X-RAY TUBES, VIDICON AND 9" IMAGE INTENSIFIER) $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $15,000.00 (COVERS ALL PARTS, LABOR AND GLASSWARE) STANDARD WARRANTY IS 30 DAYS PARTS AND LABOR. DRAWINGS AND ROOM LAYOUT WILL BE FURNISHED UPON RECEIPT OF SIGNED CONTRACT. PRICES DO NOT INCLUDE ROOM PREP OR DUCT WORK. ROOM WILL BE STAGED AT OUR FACILITY. TERMS: 50% DOWN PAYMENT UPON CONTRACT SIGNING. 50% UPON DELIVERY. 827 IMAGING DIAGNOSTICS, INC 2702 DELMAR VICTORIA, TEXAS 77901 1-800-722-8909 MST / RFX (USED) SYSTEM PRICING BASE SYSTEM $60,000.00 PAINTING $10,000.00 NEW GLASSWARE $20,000.00 ( INCLUDES 2 X-RAY TUBES, VIDICON AND 6" IMAGE INTENSIFIER ) 4-WAY FLOATING TOP TRIPLE FIELD, L300 & 105 CAMERA ORDOGRAPH CHEST STAND, NO PHOTOTIMING CHEST STAND WITH PHOTOTIMING 1 YEAR WARRANTY $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $10,000.00 (COVERS ALL PARTS, LABOR AND GLASSWARE) STANDARD WARRANTY IS 30 DAYS PARTS AND LABOR. DRAWINGS AND ROOM LAYOUT WILL BE FURNISHED UPON RECEIPT OF SIGNED CONTRACT. PRICES DO NOT INCLUDE ROOM PREP OR DUCT WORK. ROOM WILL BE STAGED AT OUR FACILITY. TERMS: 50% DOWN PAYMENT UPON CONTRACT SIGNING. 50% UPON DELIVERY. n LJ • 828 f THE X-RAY COMPANY OF TEXAS r isHWIOCK OUSTN MIDLAND SOLD TO: 3910 GASTON AVE. • DALLAS, TEXAS 75246 • (214) 8233330 WAGE AUSTIN EL PASO SAN ANTONIO FORT WORTH DALLAS T LER AMARILLO OEA,UMONT WICHITA FALLS SAN ANOELO TEXARIUNA SRYAN MCALLEN WESLACO MST ARTHUR NACOGDOCHES HARLINGEN B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A County Auditor 211 S. Ann, County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 SHIP TO: Memorial Medical Center 815 North Virginia Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 PAGE ---!--OF 4 PAGES QUOTATION DATE: October 4, 1991 SALESMAN: Watson Gilbert X-Ray Is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of pages, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms elated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and conditions within.30 days. The prices staled herein are based on delivery of the Equip. ment during the month of Aug. 1992 (See 8. (a), 8 (b) on reverse side) - QUANTITY and DESCRIPTION CATALOG NUMBER TOSHIBA KDU 90/15 R & F SYSTEM ONE WAY SYSTEM) KXO-15E Radiographic/Fluoroscopic Single Phase, 50kW X-Ray Generator Oonsisting of: X-Ray Control High Voltage Transformer 2 Sets of H.T. Switches 2 Sets Phototiming Control Mociiles Phototiming Power Supply Features: • Powers 1 X-Ray Tubes Radiographic Rating 320mA at 150kV, 500mA at LOW 640mA at 80kV Radiographic kV Range of 40 to 150kV in 10 Steps mA Stations of 20, 50, 100, 200, 250, 320, 400, 500 and 640 I IA Rad Timer from 0.01 to 9.9 Sec. (24 Steps) Fluoro Rating 4mA at 120kV Fluoro mA Range 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 mA Fluoro Tiber Presetting 1, 2, 3, 4 min with 0-99.9 Min. Cumulative Fluoro Time Indicator Tube Overload Protection Circuitry 3600 rpm Starter Circuitry DT-KDU 90/15 Radiographic/Fluoroscopic Table with the following features: Cont. Page 2.... TERMS OF DELIVERY F.O.B. TERMS OF PAYMENT 10 % Down Payment with Order 70% Payment Due Upon Shipment of Major Com parents of Equipment on the Order 20 % Balance Upon First Use of Equipment FOR SPECIAL DESIGNED EQUIPMENT —SEE 2. (a) ON REVERSE SIDE. All payments are net 30 days from date of Invoice. CUSTOMER APPROVAL AS QUOTED. • CUSTOMER SIGNATURE PRICE THE GILBERT X-RAY COMPANY OF TEXAS AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE r 4. 829 THE 949W X-RAY COMPANY OF TEXAS PAGE 2 OF B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. QUOTATION DATE: October 4, 1991 (Name of Customer) QUANTITY and I DESCRIPTION CATALOG NUM13Efl PRICE - 15 Degree Trendelenbutg to 90 Degree Vertical Tilt, Constant Speed, with an Automatic Stop at Horizontal 4 Way Motorized Table Top. Travel to Foot End is 20 Inch, to Head End is 40 ]hch, Transverse Travel Plus/Minus 3.5 Inch Less than 1.5mm Al Equivalent Absorption at 100kV with Carbon Fibre Table Top Flat Table Top with 2.5 Inch Film to Top Distance without ABC Detector and 3 Inch Film to Top Distance with AEC Detector. 'Top is 33.5 Inch From Floor LF Super Speed Bucky with 12:1 Ratio, 103 Line Grid • and Solidet Detector Bucky Travel is 42.5 Inch Tilting and Table Top Centering Controls are on the Table and SFD Spotfilm Device with: • Four Cassette Sizes 35cm X 35cm, 24cm X 30cm, 24cm X 24cm, 18cm X 24cm with Single Pushbutton Select of Film Format Size. Mixing Formats on One Film and Rapid Sequencing is Available for All Formats. Includes Partial Exposure Indicators. Cassette Loading from Front Power Driven Grid, Al, 8:1, 103 Lire Power Driven Compression Core Automatic Collimator Slide Controls Preset Readying Rotor and Cassette in Position for Rapid Spot Filming Photo -timer Detector for SFD Detachable Lead Apron 1:1 Ratio, 2 Way Power Assist Carriage Position Interlocks Rear Parking with SFD Interlocks Supports Up to 12" I.I. and Photo -Spot Camera and T.V. Camera without Ceiling Suspension Toshiba DXB 0434ES X-Ray Tube, 16 Anode .6 X 1.0 Focal, 400,000 H.U. Standard Accessories Included: Bucky Mounting Plate for LF Bucky Fittings for X-Ray Tube Cont. Page 3.... • ADDITIONAL TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE VVV • • THE COW X-RAY COMPANY or TEXAS 0 B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. QUOTATION DATE: (Name of Customer) PAGE 3 OF 4 0 . ^_S,;! QUANTITY and DESCRIPTION CATALOG_NUMBEfl PRICE High Tension Cable - Necessary Length System Cabinet Pair of Hand Grips Foot Rest Adjustable at 5 Positions Footswitch Compression Band Shoulder Rest SII-0070 7bscope 404B-RF Nine Metal I.I. Subsystem Consisting of: 9 Inch Metal I.I. and Power Supply One Way Optical Distributor (Straight) Chalnicon T.V. Camera 17 Inch T.V. Monitor T.V. Monitor Cart Mounting Plate for 9 Inch I.I. 85% QED DST-100A Overhead Tube Conveyor System Consisting of: Overhead X-Ray Tube SuppcEt Vertical Travel of Tube 59" Source to Ceiling Height of 33" to 91" Manual Movement with Electromagnetic Locks Minimum 9' Ceiling Includes: Cable Hanger Column Base Assembly Telescopic Column Assembly Tube Arm Assembly Control Switch Box with Convex Ruler and Angulation Scale Rail Assembly Lateral Travel 6'8", Longitudinal Travel 1412" Horizontal SID Monitor Discrete 36", 40", 48" and 72" Horizontal SID Monitoring Automatic Centering Stop Automatic Collimator Vertical SID Monitor for CCL-0100 on OTC-500 High Voltage Cable - Necessary Length DXB-0324CS X-Ray Tube 300,000 H.U., .6 X 1.2 Focal Cont. Page 4.... ADDITIONAL TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE THE °o X-RAY' COMPANY OF TEXAS B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. QUOTATION DATE: (Name of Customer) • .i "Uq PAGE 4 OF QUANTITY and DESCRIPTION CATALOG NUMBER PRICE BLJC-0200 Diagnostic Stand - Vertical Bucky Stand Complete Features: Vertical Adjustment of 110cm Stand is Fastened at Two Points Each on the Flop and on the Wall Bucky Adaptation Parts Included Includes: Front Cover and Profile Accessory Rails L.F. Bucky Cable and Terminal Strip Cover Super Speed Bucky Cassette Size Sensing Tray Grid, 8:1 Ratio, 103 Line, 48-72 Focal Solidet Phototimer Detector NET H9CA PRICE Price plus Sales Tax if applicable ADDITIONAL TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE 4 $156,000.00 • C� • .oai++ • • MEDICAL EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE IMAGING 17194 PRESTON ROAD, SUITE 123-260 1 10 1 POST OAK BLVD., SUITE 9-652 DALLAS, TEXAS 7524e HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056 TELEPHONE: (214) 3e0-9545 TELEPHONE: (713) 961-3102 MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 815 N. Virginia Street Port Lavaca, TX 77979 A,. QUOTATION DATE: September 23, 1991 NUMBER: JF-1008 PERFORMANCE IMAGING is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of —2_ pages, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms stated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and conditions on the face and back hereof within 30 days. QUANTITY AND CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION SHIMADZU 90/90 R/F SYSTEM WITH HIGH FREQUENC GENERATOR (80 KW), NINE INCH IMAGING SYSTEM AND VERTICAL CASSETTE HOLDER YSF200 90/90 Radiographic/Fluoroscopic Tilting Table with: — Multi —format spotfilm device with o Rapid exposure sequencing. o 14 x 14, 10 x 12, 9.5 x 9.5, and 8 x 10 cassette capability • o Power assist for spot device.longitu— dinal travel o 10:1 ratio, 40 lines/cm reciprocating grid — Eight way power driven table top — Heavy duty bucky tray — Bucky with 8:1 28 lines/cm grid — Footrest, shoulder rests, and hand grips UD150B High Frequency 80KW X—Ray Generator for three tubes, three phase powered and with: — Microprocessor controlled, anatomically ro rammed with I0OOMAf 150KV ca abilit ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE TERMS OF DELIVERY: _ F.O.B. Destination TERMS OF PAYMENT: 19 If installation is included - 20% down, 700% on delivery, 10% upon completion ❑ If installation is not included - 100% net 30 days from date of Invoice O Lease Plan AUTHORIZED Purchaser's Signature • Title PRICE Submited By: (` Joe Fole 9 23 91 (Salesman) (Date) ACCEPTED By: Title �' 833- PERFORMANCE IMAGING NUMBER JF-1008 Page 2 of _2_ Pages QUANTITY AND CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION PRICE - 500 MA, 150 KV capability - Microprocessor controlled, anatomically programmed with 120 user defined technics - 3-station Phototimer Control - Spotfilm phototiming pickup. - 3-field table bucky pickup. - Automatic brightness control for fluoroscopy. • Nine inch Single Mode Image Intensifier System with metal input tube and: - Newvicon Television System with 14" monitor. - Monitor Cart. - UD150K Interface and photo pickup. - Spot device mounting hardware. CH30X Ceilingmounted tubestand with: - 181 Longitudinal ceiling rails - 8'6" transverse rails • - Magnetic lock switches, tow handles, and a inclinometer are on a front mounted panel. - Linear III Automatic Collimator - Table tilt sensing collimator switches - Collimator distance sensing switches - PBL Bucky conversion kit Heavy duty fluoroscopic X-Ray tube with: - 400,000 heat unit anode - 13.5 degree target with 0.6 and 1.2mm spot - Fluoro tube trunnions Heavy duty Radiographic X-Ray tube with: - 400,000 heat unit anode - 13.5 degree anode with 0.6 and 1.2mm spots - Radiographic tube trunnions Pair fluoroscopic shockproof cables Pair radiographic shockproof cables KS-80 Upright Cassette Holder. Grid for KS-80, 10:1 ratio, 103 lines. SPT-DM-01 Three Field Phototiming pickup • TOTAL SYSTEM PRICE: $190,500.00 PLUS APPLICABLE TAX • WIA r� ICAL EQUIPMENT T M LDICAL EQUIPMENT September 25, 1991 B.H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, TX 777979 RE: Remanufactured Radiographic/Fluoroscopic System Dear Sir: The enclosed bid proposals include pricing for a complete new Shimadzu R/F system which exceeds your specifications in many aspects and an alternate proposal with a 90/15 table and a 40 KW generator. Both of these systems have been universally accepted by the Health Industry because of its reliability, advanced technology, ease of operation and exceptional image reception. We would like you to consider a few points in making your decision when you compare new to remanufactured equipment. • Eospitals are under ever increasing cost restraints. When evaluating capital equipment purchases it is important to determine the equipment's life cycle. The Shimadzu system incorporates the latest technology advancements, while an older remanufactured unit is typically 7 to 10 year old technology. Our company is committed to providing the quality of equipment and service required to protect the hospitals investment for many years into the future and we seriously ask you to consider our proposals before making a decision. Sincerely, Joe Foley Imaging Consultant Encls. PERFORMANCE IMAGING 1101 POST OAK BLVD. 17194 PRESTON ROAD 12748 E. MILLBURN DR. 5500 PRYTANIA 222 BOUDREAUX ST. HWY 49 5 BOX 125 9 652 SUITE 123.260 BATON ROUGE, LA 70815 SUITE 202 SUITE 20D COLLINS, MS 39428 1UITE OUSION, iX 77056 DALLAS, 1X 75248 1504) 272 8076 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70115 LAFAYETTE, LA 70506 (601) 922-1851 13) 961,3102 (2141 380.9545 FAX 1504) 272 8109 (504) 467 5931 (3181 2323481 FAX (601( 165-4781 FAX 1713) 3263470 FAX 15041 469 5880 FAX 1318) 232.9143 • MEDICAL EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE IMAGING 17194 PRESTON ROAD, SUITE 123-260 1101 POST OAK BLVD., SUITE 9-652 DALLAS, TEXAS 75248 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056 TELEPHONE: (214f 360-9545 TELEPHONE: t713) 961-3102 MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 815 N. Virginia Street Port Lavaca, TX 77979 QUOTATION• DATE: September 23, 1991 NUMBER: JF-1008 PERFORMANCE IMAGING Is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of 2 pages, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms stated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and conditions on the face and back hereof within 30 days. QUANTITY AND CATALOG NUMBER I DESCRIPTION PRICE SHIMADZU 90/15 R/F PACKAGE WITH 40KW HIGH FREQUENCY GENERATOR, AND 9" IMAGING SYSTEM, VERTICAL CASSETTE HOLDER SF-100 90/15 Radiographic/Fluoroscopic • ilting Table including: Multi -format spotfilm device with: * Rapid exposure sequencing * 14x14, lOxl2, 9.5x9.51 and 8x10 cassette capability. * Power assist. * 10:1 ratio, 40 lines/cm recipro- cating grid. Two way power top, fluoro collimator, foot rest, and patient handgrips. Bucky with 8:1 ratio, 28 lines/per inch grid. Heavy duty bucky tray. D150K High Frequency, 40 KW X-Ray Generator or three tubes, single phase powered and ith: ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE TERMS OF DELIVERY: F.O.B. Destination TERMS OF PAYMENT: 4 If installation is included - 20% down, 700/6 on delivery, 10% upon completion ❑ If installation is not included - 1000/6 net 30 days from date of invoice O Lease Plan AUTHORIZED Purchaser's Signature Title • Submitted By: Joe Fole 9/23/91 (Salesman) (Date) ACCEPTED By: Title (Date) Irn PERFORMANCE IMAGING NUMBER ,JF-100,7 Page 2 of _3_ Pages • QUANTITY AND CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION - 120 user defined, pre-programmed technics available. - SPT-C21 Phototimer - SPT-DF-02 Spotfilm Phototiming pickup - SPT-DM-01 Bucky Phototiming pickup - IBS Interface and power supply - SA-50 High Speed X-Ray Tube starter 9" Image Intensifier System Nine inch single mode Image Intensifier System with metal input tube and: - Newvicon TV system with 14" monitor - Monitor cart - UD150B Interface and Photo pick-up - Spot device mounting hardware CH-30X Ceiling mounted tubestand with: - 18' Longitudinal rails - 8'6" transverse rails - Magnetic lock switches, tow handles, and an inclinometer are on a front mounted • panel. - Linear IZI Automatic Collimator - Table tilt sensing collimator switches - Collimator disLance sensing switches - PBL Bucky conversion kit Heavy duty Fluoroscopic X-Ray Tube: - 400,000 heat unit, rapid acceleration anode - 13.5° target with 0.6 and 1.2mm spots - YSF-100 Fluoro tube trunnions Heavy duty Radiographic X-Ray tube: - 400,000 heat unit, rapid acceleration anode - 13.5° target with 0.6 and 1.2mm spots - CH-30X Radiographic tube trunnions Pair 35 foot Fluoroscopic shockproof cables Pair 50 foot Radiographic shockproof cables E PRICE r 837 C� PERFORMANCE IMAGING NUMBER JF-1007 Page 3 of I Pages QUANTITY AND DESCRIPTION PRICE CATALOG NUMBER • KS-80 upright Cassette Holder. Grid for KS-80, 10:1 ratio, 103 lines. SPT-DM-01 Three Field Phototiming pickup TOTAL SYSTEM PRICE: I $ 218,700.00 PLUS APPLICABLE TAX • Im IMAGING DIAGNOSTICS, INC 2702 DELMAR VICTORIA, TEXAS 77901 1-800-722-8909 October 11, 1991 Mr. B. H. Comiskey, Jr. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas Dear Mr. Comiskey The follwing is our bid for the Relocation and Reinstallation of Existing Radiology Equipment as per the specifications contained in your solicitation. Our fee for this service Is $25,000,00. This is for labor only. Our bid does not Include any parts that may be necessary to complete the installalion,i.e. short cables or extra plumbing connections. TERMS: 50% DOWN PAYMENT UPON CONTRACT SIGNING 50% UPON COMPLETION isWe are aware that the G.E. CT MAX will also be moved from its current location to the new radiology department. It would be to your advantage to let us bid on relocating this system. We would even consider moving the scanner at "no charge" In exchange for a Maintenance Agreement for service to this scanner. Sincerely, Ross Schooler Sales Rep �1 U 839 SUPERIOR ECONOMIC MEDICAL PRODUCTS CO. INC. September 25, 1991 Mr, John Hayes Administrator Memorial Medical Center 810 N. Ann St. Port LaVaca, TX 77979 Dear Mr Hayes, - MAIN OFFICE - 414 CULEBRA ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78201 512/734-7373 4307 SOUTH PORT, BLDG. 104 114 NORTH 41h ST., SUITE A CORPUS CHRIST], TEXAS 78415 HARLINGEN, TEXAS 78550 5121857-7257 5121425-2432 As per your request, the following is our proposal to move your equipment to your new Ancillary Service Facility, Sempco X-Ray agrees to de -install, move, install and certify your present department as follows: A) One General Electric SFX R S F System with MST 625 II Generator, XT Hanger, Ordograph II and Wall Cassette Holder - $9,750.00 B) One Seimens Mammography X-Ray System to include all accessories - $6,995.00 C) One Kodak M6B Processor to include tanks and all related attachments - $2,530.00 All Systems relocated by Sempco X-Ray will carry a 90 day warranty on labor only. This letter is followed up with an agreement between Sempco X-Ray and Memorial Medical Center with terms and conditions. If the price is accep- table to the hospital, details and other questions will be discussed at that time also. As always, it is a pleasure serving you. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance, or answer any questions you may have. Respect su Aitted, i Tony Alvarez Sales Manager Ta/pr Enclosure FILM, CHEMICALS, ACCESSORIES • SERVICE EQUIPMENT PROCESSORS • $40 THE X-RAY COMPANY OF TEXAS PAGE ---!—OF 1 PAGES 3910 GASTON AVE. • DALLAS, TEXAS 75246 • (214) 8233330 QUOTATION HOUSTON WACO AUSTIN EL PASO SAN ANTONIO FORT MAIN DALLAS LUBBOCK TYLER AMARILLO BEAUMONT WICHITA FALLS SAN ANOELO T"ARHANA MIDLAND BRYAN MCALLEN WESIACO MST ARTHUR NACOGDOCHES HARLINGEN SOLDTO: B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. • County Auditor, County County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 SHIPTO: Memorial Medical Center 815 North Virginia Street Part Lavaca, Texas 77979 DATE: Septenber 27, 1991 SALESMAN: Watson GlIbert X-Pay Is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of -.-popes, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms slated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and conditions within 30 days. The prices staled herein are based on dall"ryof the Equip. meet during the month of Aug. 1992 (See 6.(a), 8 (b) on reverse aide) QUANTITY and I DESCRIPTION I PRICE CATALOG NUMBER RELOCATION OF EXISTING EQUIR4EN1' ITEM 1: G.E. RIF Systan NET PRICE WITH 90 DAY LABOR MRRANPY 1 $21,200.00 ITEM 2: Serpens Mamnot Matimugraphy Unit NET PRICE WITH 90 DAY LABOR WARRANPY 1 $ 3,112.00 ITEM 3: • K M6B Processor NET PRICE WITH 90 DAY LABOR WMUWTI7 $ 1,456.00 Price plus Sales Tax if applicable TERMS OF DELIVERY F.O.B. Part Lavaca, Texas TERMS OF PAYMENT 10% Down Payment With Order 70% Payment Due Upon Shipment of Major Com ponents of Equipment on the Order 20 % Balance Upon First Use of Equipment FOR SPECIAL DESIGNED EQUIPMENT —SEE 2. (a) ON REVERSE SIDE. All payments are net 30 days from date of Invoice. CUSTOMER APPROVAL AS OUOTED. • THE GILBERT X-RAY COMPANY OF TEXAS ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE 841 THE n X-RAY COMPANY of TEXAS 3910 GASTON AVE. s DALLAS, TEXAS 75246 s (214) 823.3330 HOUSTON WACO AUSTIN EL PASO SAN AN70NIO FORT WORTH WBBOCK TYLER AMARILLO BEAUMONT WICHIIA FALLS BAN ANGELO AIDLAND BRYAN MCALLEN WESLACO PORT ARTHUR NACOGDOCHES SOLD TO: B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. County Auditor, County County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 SHIP TO: Memorial Medical Center 815 North Virginia Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 v: PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES • QUOTATION DALLAS TEKARIUNA HARLINGEN DATE:_ September 27 1991 SALESMAN: Watson Gilbert kRay Is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of Jpages, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms stated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and conditions within 30 days. The prices staled herein are based on dellvary of the Equip- ment during the month of All(_ 17 (See 8. (a), B (4) on reverse aide) QUANTITY and CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION PRICE Rad-X MV3000A Panoramascope Motorized Viewer awb Price plus Sales Tax if applicable TERMS OF DELIVERY F.O.B. Plat Lavaca, Texas TERMS OF PAYMENT 10% Down Payment with Order 70% Payment Due Upon Shipment of Major Com- ponents of Equipment On the Order 20 % Balance Upon First Use of Equipment FOR SPECIAL DESIGNED EQUIPMENT —SEE 2. (a) ON REVERSE SIDE. All payments are net 30 days from date of Invoice. CUSTOMER APPROVAL AS QUOTED. CUSTOMER SIGNATURE $13,500,00 THE GILBERT X-RA COMPANY OF TEXAS AD Ep SIGN RE DATE — !7—�� i ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE C 842 , imp • • • tv MEDICAL PERFORMANCE IMAGING 17194 PRESTON ROAD, SUITE 123-260 1101 POST OAK BLVD., SUITE 9-652 DALLAS, TEXAS 75246 'HOUSTON. TEXAS 77056 TELEPHONE: (214) 3e0-9545 TELEPHONE: (7f3t 96 1-3 102 MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER B15 N. Virginia Street Port Lavaca, TX 77979 QUOTATION DATE: September 26, 1991 NUMBpR: JF-1009 PERFORMANCE IMAGING is pleased to submit the following quotation, consisting of 1 pages, and offers to sell the products described herein at prices and terms stated, subject to your acceptance of the terms and condltioha on the face and back hereof within 30 days. ADDITIONAL TERMS OF QUOTATION APPEAR ON REVERSE SIDE TERMS OF DELIVERY: F.O.B. Destination TERMS OF PAYMENT: ❑ If installation is included - 201/ down, 700/ on delivery, 100/6 upon completion ❑ It installation is not included - 1000/ net 30 days from date of Invoice O Lease Plan AUTHORIZED Purchaser's Signature Title Submited By: Joe Foley 9/26/91 (Salesman) ACCEPTED By: Title (Date) (Date) r 84� quotation Memorial Medical Center 810 N Ann St Box 25 Port Lavaca TX 77979 ATTN: B. H. Comiskey, Jr., C.P.A. County Auditor 4 AMSCO AMSCO Quotation No: SW91-2383 Date: October 9, 1991 AMSCO is pleased to make the following proposal for your consideration: ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE 1 EAGLE 3000 SERIES STERILIZER WITH STAGE 2 1 $21,682.00 CONTROL: Features an advanced vertically mounted microcomputer control system, providing the latest standard for cycle setup, selection, and monitoring. Additional features include battery back-up, cycle safeguards, manual control, status messages, radial locking door, supervisor access, temp in F and C and foreign language capability. RH (Gravity) 16x16x26"; Single Door; Electric 208-240V; Recessed. Equipment No. FF11-101-013 INCLUDES ITEM IA IA AMSCO RACK AND TWO SHELVES: for use 1 in EAGLE 16X16X26 Sterilizer. Refer to Tech Data SD-325. Equipment No. AX00-547-300 2 POLARIS LIGHT 2-36" ARMS 1 $13,000.00 Equipment No. PT33-180 INCLUDES ITEM 2A 2A POLARIS VARIAC DUAL REC 1 Equipment No. PT00-000-000-0000-7200 IVU nCU: Sale of any Products or Services covered by this quotation is conditioned upon the terms contained herein (including those on the back of this quotation). Any additional or different terms proposed by Buyer will not be binding upon American Sterilizer Company unless specifically assented to in writing by American Sterilizer Company's authorized representative in Cris, Pennsylvania. • 18? .y Memorial Medical Center Page 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION AMSCO Quotation No: SW91-2383 Date: October 9, 1991 AMSCO WARMING CABINET, TWO COMPARTMENTS: U.L. listed; recess mounted, both compart- ments electrically heated. Overall size is 30"Wx24"Dx74"H. The upper compartment heat- ing range is 100 to 180 degrees F.; and the lower compartment is heated to 100 degrees F., plus or minus 20 degrees. Includes two adjustable shelves in the lower compartment. Unit is constructed of stainless steel. Right hinge. Equipment Number DJ04-122-132 INCLUDES ITEM 3A 3A BLANKET SUPPORT SHELF Equipment No. DJ00-000-000-1000 AMSCO 2080 SERIES MAJOR SURGICAL TABLE: Hydraulic, manual; cast iron base enclosed in stainless steel cover; four conductive, swivel casters and floor locks; manual kidney elevator; tabletop is approximately 72" L x 20" W; height adjustable from 27" - 45"; UL listed and NFPA approved; includes 2" conductive pad; x-ray tops. Refer to Tech Data SD-320; Catalog TC-800 Equipment Number BE56-721-000-0200 INCLUDES ITEMS 4A THRU 4G 4A ARMBOARD W/3" PAD. Refer to Tech Data SD-42 Equipment Number BF16-500 4B TRI CLAMP (PR). Allow independent release of horizontal, vertical and rotational functions, making it easy for one person to adjust the position of accessories. Tri clamps can secure accessories with either round or rectangular posts. Refer to Tech Data SD-470, Catalog TC-285. Equipment Number BF31-200 4C LITHOTOMY LEGHOLDERS ADULT (PR) (REQ PR CLARK SOCKETS). Separate adjustments for height and angulation. Change of either leg position occasions no lessening in control over leg. Clark Sockets required. Refer to Tech Data SD-42, Catalog TC-285. Equipment Number BF05-400 QTY 1 PRICE $3,870.00 $15,690.00 845 Memorial Medical Center Page 3 AMSCO Quotation No: SW91-2383 Date: October 9, 1991 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE 4D WINGED ETHER SCREEN WITH LOCKS. Provides 1 tent effect over and around patient. Simple turn knob permits lateral rotation of screen arms. Refer to Tech Data SD-44, Catalog TC-285. Equipment Number BF07-500 4E CONDUCTIVE RESTRAINT STRAP. Has quick-releas 1 positive adjustment. Extra -wide webbing is soil resistant, washable and electrically conductive. Refer to Tech Data SD-43, Catalog TC-285. Equipment Number BF08-800 4F FOOT EXTENSION W/LOCKS. Extends the table 1 to accommodate tall patients. The extension also swings 90 degrees upward for foot support when patient is in reverse Trendelenburg. Extension is full width and locks to side rails of table -foot section. Refer to Tech Data SD-42, Catalog TC-285. Equipment Number BF03-100 4G CASSETTE TRAY & HANDLE - 141IX17". 1 Equipment Number BF13-700 EQUIPMENT TOTAL $54,242.00 5 AMSCO SERVICE INSTALLATION FOR ALL 1 2,500.00 ITEMS ON QUOTATION: Installation by AMSCO will include uncrating of new unit, setting in place, hooking up to existing utilities, test and demonstration. Customer will be responsible to assure that manufacturer's rough -in requirements are met, and for any finish work that may be necessary to floors, walls or ceiling. Equipment No. CQ03 TOTAL QUOTATION $56,742.00 IN LIEU OF YOUR BID SPECIFICATIONS, WE ARE BIDDING OUR STANDARD PRODUCTS PER THE ATTACHED TECHNICAL DATA. Pricing includes: 1. F. 0. B. destination, tailgate delivery. 2. Supervision of installation, test and demonstration. 11 • C - 846. lw:. Memorial Medical Center AMSCO Quotation No: SW91-2383 Page 4 Date: October 9, 1991 Pricing does not include: (Unless otherwise specified) 1. Taxes of any kind. NOTE: Under present circumstances, this quotation may be considered firm for thirty (30) days from this date. Acceptance later is subject to confirmation. Our quotation is extended on the basis of shipment being made within twelve (12) months after receipt of purchase order or contract. For extended shipments, add 1/2% per month for any subsequent period beyond twelve (12) months. Terms of payment - net 30 days from date of invoice. BY: JJJ) , 69�f fI Morrow ustomer Account Rep. American sterilizer Company Southwest Regional Office Suite 100 1210 E. Campbell Rd. Richardson, TX 75081 (800) 999-3990 ACCEPTED FOR: Memorial Medical Center Signature Title Date 84'7 MDR Castle Harvey • Technology for Life 0,YY ° McKESSON' September 26, 1991 B.H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor, Calhoun County 211 S. Ann --County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 RE: Sealed Bid --Surgical Equipment, Commissioners Court Due 9/30/91 Dear Mr. Comiskey: In response to your recent inquiry, I am pleased to provide firm pricing on the following MDT Biologic equipment: UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Two Each MDT Shampaign 1900 Major O.R. Tables with Accessories per specifications.......................$20,807.00 $41,614.00 No installation charge on above quoted tables....................No Charge Four Each MDT 2032 Major Surgical Lights, Center Point Mountings, Dual --Three Source ..................$11,798.00 $47,190.00 Installation of 2032 Surgical Lights ....................$502.00 $2,008.00* *Please see Attachment "A" which is enclosed that provides installation details and responsibilities. Pay careful attention to section "F". Two Each MDT 5550 Warming Cabinet, Cabinet Mountings, without Recorders.....................................$5,678.00 $11,356.00 Installation of 5550 Warming Cabinets ...................$251.00 $502.00* *Please see Attachment "A" which is enclosed that provides installation details and responsibilities. One Each MDT 3522 Gravity Sterilizer, 16"x16"x26", Single Door, Cabinet Mounting with Electric Heat, Chart Recorder and Rack with Two shelves.........................$25,985.00'° Installation of 3522 sterilizer.....................................$838.00 *Please see Attachment "A" which is enclosed that provides installation details and responsibilities. The above quoted equipment includes a two year warranty per specifications. C J MDT Corporation • 1701 Summit Drive, Suite 12 Plano, Texas 75074, U.S.A. Telephone Sales (214) 424-4578/79/70, Service (214) 424-4541 /42 Facsimile (214) 424-9102 County Auditor, Calhoun County • September 26, 1991 Page 2 If you should decide to use a general contractor to install this quoted equipment MDT Product Support will provide, without cost to you, the on -site service of a qualified person to supervise installation. MDT Corporation will provide specifications and rough -in drawings necessary for review and approval by contractors/owners and for use by the necessary trades active in the installation and connections of the equipment. Terms are net 45 days with freight being F.O.B. Destination. No applicable taxes are included in this price quotation. The above firm price quotation is based on receipt of your purchase order per terms set forth in the H.S.C.A. contract. Data/specifications are attached on all quoted equipment. If you have any questions regarding this quotation or if I can be of assistance in any way, please contact me in our Plano office at (800) 683-4638 or for local calls 424-4578. Cordially, • Marcus Warren Senior Sales Representative MDT Corporation Attachment /dr cc: B. Arnold is 849 October 14, 1991 B. U. Comiskey County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann — County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Mr. Comiskey: ATST Room 117 5444 S. Staples Corpus Christi, Tx 75411 (512) 994-4400 In response to Port Lavaca Memorial Medical Center's Request For Proposal, we submit the following response and this letter. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, AT&T will abide by the terms and conditions of the Request For Proposal to the extent they do not conflict with, contradict, or add to the terms and conditions of ATV 's Product and Maintenance Agreements. To the extent such terms and conditions conflict with, contradict, or add to the terms and conditions of AT&T's Product and Maintenance Agreements, terns and conditions of AT&T Product and Maintenance Agreements control and supersede those in the Request For Proposal. AT&T is willing to negotiate, however, it's terms and conditions, prior to, or upon award of, the contract. AT&T's bid response does provide responses which are nonstandard for ATV 's standard terms and conditions. These responses are provided to: (1) indicate ATV 's willingness to negotiate, and (2) communicate conceptually AT&T's proposed changes to our standard terms and conditions to meet the expressed needs of Port Lavaca Memorial Medical Center. All prices provided in our response to the Request For Proposal are' valid for 60 days unless the interval is otherwise extended in writing by AT&T. Should you require additional information in reference to this, please contact me at 512-994-4444. Sincerely, Pat Murphey Account Executive • • C� • AT&T'S PRICING FOR PORT LAVACA MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER The following pricing reflects a discount based upon Port Lavaca Memorial Medical Center being part of Hospital of America (HCA) and therefore subject to their pricing discounts and terms and conditions of their Master Agreement with AT&T. The total cost for the Definity System $111,015.10 The Lease Terms provided are offered by AT&T Credit Corporation. At the end of the lease tern, ownership would be transferred to Port Lavaca Memorial Medical Center. 24 Month Term $5,110.03 36 Month Term $3,540.27 60 Month Term $2,291.35 Warranty/Maintenance The Definity System is provided with a one year warranty. Thereafter, maintenance is available as an option. The cost for the maintenance in year 2, after the expiration of the first year's warranty is: Year 2 Maintenance is r L J $837.40 Monthly 851 OCTOBER 14, 1991 MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER - MERIDIAN 1 , OPTION 21 SALES PRICE : $ 88,200.00 SECOND YEAR MAINTENANCE: $ 8,784.00 THE FINANCING OPTION LISTED BELOW INCLUDE ONE YEAR MAINTENANCE. DIRECT PURCHASE OPTION. REQUIRED WITH CONTRACT (30%) : $ 26,460.00 INVOICED UPON INSTALLATION (70%) $ 61,740.00 MUNICIPAL LEASE AGREEMENT THE MUNICIPAL FINANCING AGREEMENT PROVIDES FOR FINANCING THE ABOVE REFERENCE EQUIPMENT. THE MUNICIPAL LEASE AGREEMENT IS BILLED IN ARREARS AND MEETS MOST LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENT FOR THE LEASING OF EQUIPMENT TO STATE AND LOCAL ENTITIES. THERE IS A ONE DOLLAR PURCHASE OPTION AT THE END OF THE LEASE. ONE ADVANCE PAYMENT IS REQUIRED WITH THE SALES CONTRACT. 24 Months: $ 3,969.88 36 Months: $ 2,749.19 60 months: $ 1,772.82 THE ABOVE PRICING IS VALID UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 1991 n • • OEM d 11 ABBOTT September 27, 1991 page 1 of 2 Diagnostics Division Abbott Laboratories One Abboll Park Road • Abboa Park, Illinois 60064-3500 Memorial Medical Center Port Lavaca, TX 77979 IMMUNOASSAY ANALYZER BID Abbott Laboratories, Diagnostics Division, would like to respond to this invitation to bid by offering the following: IMx Fluorescence Polarization and Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Analyzer. The Abbott IMx Analyzer meets or exceeds all requirements described in this bid's specifications. We have added comments to those areas within section III. SPECIFICATIONS in which we wished provide additional information for your review. As requested, the following acquisition options are being proposed for the Abbott IMx analyzer: PURCHASE. . . . . . . . . . . $45,865.50 • *LEASE (36 months) . . . . . . . 1,335.15/month *LEASE (48 months) . 1,096.65/month *LEASE (60 months) . 936.57/month Prices quoted herein include the following: TRAINING: To be provided to two (2) operators for three (3) days at our Irving, Texas facility, all expenses paid including airfare. SERVICE: Provides an unlimited number of service calls and preventive maintenance inspections, as defined by the product. Service will be provided Monday -Friday, 8:30 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. at your facility. Includes all labor, travel, parts (less consumables and accessories), and guaranteed 24 on -site hour response time. (This is for two (2) years as requested). The instrument will ship FOB Destination following completion of training, approximately 30 days ARO. • page 2 of 2 • *These monthly figures, based on current leasing rates from GE Capital, are subject to change and are contingent upon the account being deemed creditworthy by GE Capital. These rates are based upon a Tax Oriented Lease which includes the following stipulations: - One advance payment - Depreciation is claimed by GE Capital - At lease expiration, the customer may purchase the equipment for fair market value, return the equipment to GECC, or renew the lease. A 24 month lease has not been.quoted because it is not available through GE Capital, therefore, we have included a 48 month option for your consideration. M. A. Bennett 9/27/91 Administrator, Pricing • 854 GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY- PERMITS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that Calhoun County grant a permit to GBRA to install facilities as shown on the following instruments with the understanding that by the usage of such permit GBRA agrees that such facilities and the installation, maintenance and usage thereof shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions set out in the original contract between GBRA and Calhoun County dated March 21, 1972 and recorded in Vol. R, Page 307 of the Commissioners' Court Minutes of Calhoun County, texas and that GBRA agrees to be bound by all such terms and provisions. . SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/3/91 19 Name of Customer Requesting Service: Patrick Bulot C. Number of Connections Wanted: D. Map Sheet Number: One DIO E. Customer Number to be assigned: 03-2719 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date • B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature • Engineering: Date Signature a r.. 855 f �a • SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/20/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Nike Daniel • C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D5 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 09-2717 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature • 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 857 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/3/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Richard D. Chislett • C. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: D20 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2741 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B.. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature • 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • W• I SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL HATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 7. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/ 6/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Carl Oaab Jr. • C. Number of Connections Wanted: Onp D. Map Sheet Number: D20C E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2712 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served'by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I m I I I I I L_ I /%z • /72d 6+5- an I a� C"qr- I Daa b fr c�o-a-7iaJ • SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM I. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/10/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Harvey E. Brandon • C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D206 (9 19B) E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2713 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: We have changed the location of Thomas Taggart #20 2691 in order to serve him off this new line. 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature • 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 863 7 : ,eAb nYSY • P m n m O O ___ 6;//i1�• _—______ T omas Ta95ar-f t a0 'a�91 �eNun9e rain � 19-a7/3.-�Jar�ey Ao ,D I 1 A +�— —cam )—ti i � p WASN/nJGTaA) 7; -- -o o �- • t'a..vt N SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/11/91 • B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Joy W. Hankey C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20A E. Customer Number to be assigned:20-2714 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature �- 865 4' ® - J. Pickereon • 848 q 4 I Cl 1 j L"J I jl se I o I j I Poeerd I I, ,y • 794 II I M I rn J Il I o Match Line S 20 B z �4-L0669 Fred Cowrnbicm, Q+ • + � d r S� lJ I ia�ke 10-31i� 4�rt -P,t 1)2.0� :�i SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/12/91 • B. Name of Customer Requesting Service• Jay Easely C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20D E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2715 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • • r. i I om Y0 0 'L 868 . SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/24/91 • B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Jonelle Trouedale C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2716 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: • Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature • 3rd Done lle- I lI'"musdale� • • r1 L_J 870 �J SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 9/30/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Id. D. Oden C. Number of Connections Wanted: nip D. Map Sheet Number: D19B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2718 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B'. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature • 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature r -I L J C Z y Lester ' 0730 J. D. Loiser .0707 L. A. Giorgio • 6B5 aAl;D u� • • A 872 TAX ROLL FOR 1991 • A Motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the Order Approving the Calhoun County Tax Roll for 1991 be approved. ORDER APPROVING CALHOUN COUNTY TAX ROLL FOR 1991 WHEREAS, the chief Appraiser for the year 1991 has heretofore certified the appraisal roll to the Tax As?essor, and the appraisal roll with tax amounts shown, which now constitutes the tax roll, has been submitted to the Commissioners Court; and WHEREAS, pursuant thereto the Chief Appraiser has compiled the Calhoun County tax roll for the year 1991 as required by law and that the certificate contained on the State Property Tax Board 1991 County Report of Property Value (which report has been prepared by the Chief Appraiser) has been signed and executed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE COMMISSIONERS COURT • OF CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That said Calhoun County tax roll for the year 1991 be and the same is hereby approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of October, 1991. COMMISSIONERS URT OF.0 HO COUNTY =' TEXAS t By — Howaro zo , t Ju ge ATTEST: Vd4 Mar ne Paul, County Clerk CALHOUN COUNTY FARM TO MARKET & LATERAL ROAD 1991 TAX ROLL AND LEVY CATEGORY: ASSESSED VALUE: TAX LEVY: Taxable Value $ 1,568,067,232 $ 470,427.37 1, A. K. Monroe, Tax Assessor/Collector of the Calhoun County Appraisal District, do solemnly swear that the tax roll and levy above contains a correct and full list of the real and personal property as submitted to me by the Calhoun County Appraisal District. A. K. Mo ro , Tax Assessor/Collector Calhoun ounty Appraisal District Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of October, 1991. zae,u/ G(/ 1.!�rl�Gl. _ Nancy W. Draker, Notary Public in and for Calhoun County, Texas. My commission expires 05-18-95. r;: • •,,., NANCY W. 8AI(ER Notary Pu61ic, 9lzte of Teszs �;' •' `s My Comminion Uphes 5-13.95 c • • 874 • is CALHOUN COUNTY 1991 TAX ROLL AND LEVY CATEGORY: ASSESSED VALUE: TAX LEVY: Taxable Value $ 1,576,480,297 $ 5,044,733.09 1, A. K. Monroe, Tax Assessor/Collector or the Calhoun- County Appraisal District, do solemnly swear that the tax roll and levy above contains a correct and full list of the real and personal property as submitted to me by the Calhoun County Appraisal District. ak A. K. Moq oe Tax Assessor/Collector Calhoun County Appraisal District Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of October, 1991. 7zA/ , Nancy W. fMker, Notary Public in and for Calhoun County, Texas. My commission expires 05-18-95. NANCY W. 0ARCR s x_ I Notary Public. Slate of Texas •' 1 My Commission Eapires 5 1895 875 AUDIT FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1991 A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the Court authorize the County Auditor and County Judge to communicate with the hospital on the subject of one auditor performing the total audit for the year 1991 for the Calhoun County governmental entities, including Memorial Medical Center, and furthermore upon approval of the Hospital Board of same, that the County Auditor and County Judge obtain a written proposal identifying services to be performed and estimated cost of services and to submit proposal to Commissioners' Court for final action. DRAINAGE DISTRICT 18 COMMISSIONERS A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that Melbourn Shillings, Pat Lundin, and Louis Foester III be re -appointed Commissioners of Drainage District #8 for two year terms. GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION A Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner • Belk that Commissioner Oscar Hahn be the County's representative to the Board of Directors of the Regional Planning Commission and Commissioner Helen Smith be the Courts' representative to the General Assembly of the Regional Planning Commission.Motion carried. BIDS AND PROPOSALS -SHERIFF'S DEPT.VEHICLES A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for three(3) 1992 vehicles for the Sheriff's Department, to be paid• for out of the 1992 budget. APPRAISAL DISTRICT DIRECTORS A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that Calhoun County nominate George Miller, Richard Barton, Leonard Dreymala, Sue Traylor and Jesse Rodriguez as the counties nominees to serve as Appraisal District Directors until December 31, 1993, and the Court approve the Voting Resolution/ • Ballot. .,t. i. 876 • VOTING RESOLUTION/BALLOT WHEREAS, Section 6.03 of the Texas Property Tax Code entitles the County of Calhoun to vote in the Election of Directors to serve on the Board of the Calhoun County Appraisal District, and, WBEREAS, the County of Calhoun desires to exercise that vote, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Calhoun does hereby cast its 865 votes as indicated below, for candidates to serve on the Calhoun County Appraisal District Board of Directors for the two (2) year term ending December 31, 1993. NOMINEES: NO. OF VOTES: RICHARD BARTON / 17z LEONARD E. DREYMALA ry- _ GEORGE MILLER �1-3 JESSIE RODRIGUEZ 1 ,7-5 SUE TRAYLOR / ,7v PASSED AND APPROVED, this JlAiday of &V`-Jty , 1991. y ATTESTi. A/A/ Presiding O icer 877 BIDS -AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT FLOATER A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried to authorize the County Auditor to advertise for bids for ambulance equipment floater. COUNTY JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS' ASSOCIATION -ASSESSMENT After considering a request of County Judges and Commissioners' Association, all members of the Court voted for the assessment of $300.00 as a special assessment for Calhoun county, for expenses incurred in obtaining legislative relief from jail overcrowding and the backlog of convicted felons. BUDGET AMENDMENT- COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Belk , seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that an emergency be declared to amend the budget of the County Health Dept. to purchase equipment. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners, Court ' From: P11LA A P01lY*40AJ (Depar''ftment making this request) Date: � Q -1 4 -_1nn1 I request an amendment to the budget for the --(year)— following line items in my department: GL Account # Amendment Account Name Amount --- -------- -------------------- Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Reason s I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: • • • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 878 COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY REPORT The County Treasurer presented her monthly and quarterly report and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried. CALHOUN COWIT, 'TEXAS S'I'A'niMGNI' OF BALANCES • Balance Balance 7/1/91 Receipts Disbursements 9/30/91 General S 4,094,442 $ 280,663 $1,319,737 $ 3,055,568 Road & Bridge General 777,755 43,936 255,953 565,738 Road & Bridge Precinct 1 128,143 107,696 82,904 153,035 Road & Bridge Precinct 2 107,710 09,533 69,704 127,539 Road & Bridge Precinct 3 285,161 82,057 64,378 302,840 Road & Bridge Precinct 4 168,466 164,800 172,026 161,240 FM -Literal Road 8713,691 18,702 201,969 695,424 Road Waintenance Precinct 1 62,072 1,032 -0- 63,104 Road Mai.nLenance Precinct 4 9,617 159 -o- 9,776 Lateral. Road Precinct 1 3,827 67 3,849 45 Lateral Road Precinct 2 3,827 67 3,849 - 45 Lateral Road Precinct 3 3,827 67 3,849 45 Lateral Road Precinct 4 3,827 67 3,849 45 Flood Control Precinct 1 77,702 1,254 3,903 75,053 Flood Control. Precinct 2 885 14 -o- 899 Flood Control Precinct 3 12,331 208 -o- 12,539 Flood Control Precinct 4 1,150 14 -o- 1,164 Sanitary landfill 283,688 67,993 63,363 288,318 Sanitary Landfill Replacement 125,754 2,084 4,335 123,503 Airport Maintenance 15,027 295 2,278 16,044 Bank Franchise Tax 57,304 13,111. -a- 70,415 Law Library 439 1,959 1,709 689 Library Gift -Memorial 127 3,036 -o- 3,163 Voter Registration 2,318 41 -o- 2,359 Fine & Court Costs holding 21,863 10,980 23,792 9,051 Donations 38,337 7,512 9,349 36,500 • Grants 67,270 3,594 5,432 65,432 Juvenile Probation 8,009 24,557 18,622 13,944 District Court - Iaprest Jury 1,300 3,545 2,856 1,989 County Court - Inprest Jury 164 2,539 2,142 561 Excess Sales Tax Revenue 791,354 679,809 -o- 1,474,163 Capital Project - Hospital 526,480 8,726 -o- 535,206 Capital Project - New Library Bldg. 2.1,289 326 3,423 18,192 Library Cert. of Oblig. Constr. 166 1 167 -0- Library Cert. of Oblig. Int. & Skg. 22,872 658 16,889 6,641 General Oblig. Bonds llosp. Constr. 7,322,427 120,407 599,170 6,843,664 General Oblig. Bonds Int. & Skg. 40,925 722 24 41,623 Hospital Operating 334,431 2,093,244 1,803,497 624,178 Hospital EMS Sinking 3,217 52 -a- 3,269 Ilospital. Memorial 50 -o- -0- 50 Indigent healthcare 1,997 128,196 128,080 2,113 Totals 516,4312,241 $3,963,923 $4,870,998 $15,405,166 We the undersigned County Judge and Commissioners in and for Calhoun County, Texas, hereby certify that we have this date mode a/n, �examination of theq Co my Treasurer's quarterly report, filed with us on this _/ day of �Cf_th_(ni 1991, and have found the sane to be correct and in due order.. WI1NI;55 OUR HANDS, officially, this o �4�(�J 1991. Iloward IIa - C my Judge Zero -fn ssiol r Precinct No. Ilelen_ Srrgth, Col iss Toner Precinct No. 3 • / � Lill tanlev ul,. Connussioner Pct. No. 2 Oscar 151'ill[ . Canmissi ner Pct. No. 4 SWORN TU AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, County Judge and County Con 'ssion rs of said Calhoun County, each respectively, on this /&OU day of �1( ,r,(�J 1991. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority on this clay personally appeared Sharron Marek, County ,Treasurer of Calhoun County, says that the within and foregoing report is true and F1LBD FOR RECORD�{ II�S,�-lplv ttt. day of day of M -CtipLU Sharron Marek, County Treasurer CU c l' 1991 and,peporded this 1991. /�vn/ Marleth fain, County Clerk as BUDGET AMENDMENTS- COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, HIGHWAY PATROL -COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 - O.R. CARTER, J.P.12 - AIRPORT FUND A motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following budget amendment requests be approved. • BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Auditor From: - J 2 (Department making this request) Date: 1 n- I I `9 I I request an adjustment to the current budget for my department. The following transfers result in a net change of zero to the total budget for expenditures by category (i.e., Supplies, Services, Capital Outlay). GL Account # - Account Name Amendment --------------- ------ Amount Reason • ------------ MA500-610 i Net change in total budget for this department is: 1 $ ___Q___ Other remarks/justification: --- I understand that this adjustment to my budget cannot be made without • the approval of the County Judge. Signature of official/department head: A APPROVAL (SIGNATURE) OF COUNTY JUDGE: Date of approval: ppOd� Date posted to General Ledger account(s): OCT 1 41991 sao - BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST iTo: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: GA, i AA. Q (De artment making this request) Date: (.30-CI E I request an amendment to the I I budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL -Account -# - ---Account ------- Name Amount---- I � 300 G 1(1 aJ�XOMQMiJL �1 Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: $ —Q Reason ------------------- I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Qu�,�n�� Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): INN Q Q M • lu l OCT I A 1991 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: County Court at Law No. 1 (Department making this request) Date: 10/1/91 I request an amendment to the 1991 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account 01-2010-5113 Account Name -------------'----- Photo Copies / Supplies OthriffoFne$-G Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Amendment Amount Reason $250.00 ( 250,00) $ - r I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners, Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: l-n r Date posted to General Ledger account(s): i 410 • C J C J is s 6 ln� 12J M qn± BUDGET A$3u'�rr.cF�T- REQUEST To C.-'Alheuyl C'f:qjnI:­ ()'0." 1:!:'1 I • ... ... ....... (I)ept'k, hileot; Dat t e t an ad jt.lt. tille:' f: I 1':i c�t.ly­ 1-(-,! 0; for my departMel-lb. The tit ra net chance of zero to the total budciet for expenditures by category r. Services' Capital B t I-1. zA y Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount Reason L) . ..... .... . ..... ... . ... ..... ... . .... . 0 0_ Is Net change in total b,idgRt for this department is: 0--- j I rI 4; 1- r, f,, L i!, 1 1, Carlyjut be ,made without or Hle _r jJIT C4r_ mi ni,jw-urr.) fir ­!,,Jll ------- nrT c991 1: j 0 883 �---9171'Tjny To: Calhoun �County Auditor n From: (Depart ent making this request) Date: Oct I request an adjustment to the current budget for my department. The following transfers result in a net change of zero to the total budget for expenditures by category (i.e., Supplies, Services, Capital Outlay). 1/0- Q () Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount 3 Riga � Net change in total budget for this department is: $--- 0--- Other remarks/justification: Reason I understand that this adjustment to my budget cannot; be made without the approval of the County Judge. Signature of official./department head: APPROVAL (SIGNATURE) OF COUNTY JUDGE: Date of approval: Date posted to General Ledger aCCOunt(S): r1 L_J n U • 8811 Q.0 C� BUDGET AMENDMENT - CAPITOL PROJECT -MAGNOLIA BEACH SEWER PLANT -PHASE II A motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Budget Amendment request as follows be approved. To: Ca From: BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST County Commissioners' Court (Depattment Date: 'Q 1-9 this request) Z I request an amendment to the Iq9 / budget for the year following line items in my department: GL-Account- 63- 0101-33ao 61-K5n1-Va� �3-550/- IM /oo - =!aq6 63- 55W '1So� (03- 55v0-�11� Account Name Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: Amendment Amount \\ -� 5 0.0001 fo31o0 QT n0 aa,xoo Ida000 5000 o00 )0,aoo Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. • Signature of official/department head: P, at(a ^ l Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): I ri: -r OCT 1.4 1991 • BIDS AND PROPOSALS - ASPHALT, OIL & EMULSION No bids were received, so no action was taken. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED -COUNTY Claims totaling $21,565.57 were after reading and verifying same Mikula, seconded by Commissioner be approved for payment. THE COURT RECESSED FOR LUNCH presented by the County Auditor and a motion was made by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE -ANNUAL REPORT Darrell A Dromgoole, County Agent , Kathy Singleton, Home Demonstation Agent , Denise Kay Green, Youth Co-ordinator, and Joe Surovik,County Marine Agent all gave reports of accomplishments of 1991 and plans for 1992. The Court thanked the agents for their hard work and their • accomplishments. The agents all thanked the Court for their help and cooperation. CONTRACT -MC KINNEY CONSTRUCTION -WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAGNOLIA BEACH Following,is the Contract of Mc Kinney Construction Company for the Wastewater Colleciton System Improvements for Magnolia Beach which was approved by the Court September 9, 1991 and at that time the County Judge was authorized to sign the contract. is MU s,�w *ko UNITED STATES FIDELARANTY COMPANY his bond shall be construed to incorporatehe provision of Senate Bill 021 enacted byhe 71st Legislature of the State of Texas, eaular Session, 1989' TEXAS STATUTORY PERFORMANCE BOND (Penalty of this bond must be 100%of Contract amount) STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF Victoria BOND NUMBER.. 7.2012010392910... KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: McKinney Construction Company, P. 0. Box , That.........................................................................3961.................................... .. Victoria r„Tx, 77903 .......................................................................................... (hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, a Corporate Surety, authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and licensed by the State of Texas to execute bonds as Surety, (hereinafter called the Surety), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto .... Cnmrri.ssa.onexs.'..CO.t7T.t..01;............. Calhoun County, Texas ........................................................................................................................ (hereinafter called the Obligee), in the penal sum of . One Hundr.ed ..Sevnty—Three. ........e................................... Thousand, Ninety —Six and 70/100---- =------------------------------------- ................................................................................................Dollars for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal as entered into a certain written contract with the Obligee, dated the ....4.!'. t.A ...day of.ae4l ... 19q.I...... a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof, for Construction of Wastewater Collection System Improvements for the Magnolia Beach Commnunity, Calhoun County,Texas NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the said Principal shall faithfully perform the work in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED HOWEVER, that this bond is executed pursuant to the provisions of Article 5160, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions thereof to the same extent as if it were copied at length herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said PIT cipal and Surely have signed and sealed this instrument this ...... dayof.... , 19 ... ........................../......................... ......... �L .^. .....: ........ (Seat) OF GUA NITY :..IFOR::..:......... j......... .....:................ (Seal) DISCLOSURE OF GUARANTY fUtda NUNRARTICIRpTION;�in the event ����� ��� the insurer is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations TE STATES FI YAND ARANTY COMPANY under this policy or contract or application or certificate or evidence of coverage, the policyholder or certificateholgYr..... -� . ....•.•••.•..••.••••n(Seal) Doo ug s VraZe�� Attorney -in -tact is not protected by an insurance guaranty fund or other solvency protection arrangement. • Contract 213 (Texas) (10-89) V • o� UNITED STATES EIDER_@ UARZANTY COMPANY This bond shall be construed to incorporate' o.d the provision of Senate Bill 1321 enacted by 96 (A St ck opany) the 11st Legislature of the State of Texas, Regular Session, 1989' TEXAS STATUTORY PAYMENT BOND Wenalty of this bond must be 100 % of contract amount) STATE OF TEXAS BOND NUMBER....?. COUNTY OF Victoria 20.12.0.1.0.3.9.2.910 "' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That................................McKinney Construction Company, P.O.Box 3961 ............................................................................. Victoria, Texas 77903 .................................................... .................................................................... (hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, a Corporate Surety authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and licensed by the Stale of Texas to execute bonds as Surety, (hereinafter called the Surety), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto...... Commissioners'..Court of ... Calhoun County, Texas ...................................................................................... One Hundred Seventy -Three ....... T' • (hereinafter called the Obligee), in the penal sum of ................... ............. > €. Thousand, Ninety -Six and 70/100--------------.------------..-..---.------'-Dollars for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, t Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Obligee, dated the ��?? day of... 19T. , a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof, for Construction Wastewater Collection System Improvements For the Magnolia Beach Community, Calhoun County,Texas NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the said Principal shall pay all claimants supplying labor and material to him or a subcontractor in the prosecution of the work provided for in said contract, then, this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED HOWEVER, that this bond is executed pursuant to the provisions of Article 5160, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas and all liabilities on this bond to all such claimants shall be determined in accordance with the provisions thereof to the same extent as if it were copied at length herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Pr' cipal and Surety have signed and sealed this instrument this .......... 4&...... day of .... ......... ...... 1 9) �' 1........... ....................(Seal) 815CL8SIIREOFG(IARAh7TYFIl00A00PARTIC[PATIBN: In the event the insurer is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations U TE STATE VAN' ARANTY COMPANY under this policy or contract or application or certificate (Seal) or evidence of coverage, the policyholder or certiticateholdaY .0 is not protected by an insurance guaranty fund or other Dougal VrazeT Anorney-In-fact , (Texas) • • CERTIFIED COPY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY 8946T No........................................ Haar all Mew by tke se Preaenbt That UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland. and having its principal of cs at the City of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland. does hereby constitute and appoint Douglas Vrazel of the City of Victoria • State of Texas be tme and lawful attorney in and for the State of Texas for the following pzv)ases, to wit: To sign im name u surety to, and to exeems, seal and acknowledge any and an bonds, and to respectively do and perform any and an acts and thiop set forth in the resolution of the Board of Directors of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a certified copy of which is hereto annexed and nude a pan of this Power of Attorney; and the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, through us. its Board of Directors, hereby ratifies and confirms an and whatecawa the said Douglas Vrazel may lawfully do in the premises by vhns of thew pnwnu In Witwera WAeesol, the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY has esoaad thin instrument to he scaled with its corporate teal duly attested by the signatures of its VicaPteddent and Assiatawt Secretary, this 23rd day of March . A. D. 19 T9 UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY. (Signed) (Signed) STATE OF MARYLAND. ) BALTU46RE CITY, I w' Charles B. Watson at....................................................... aida W. B. M. Eingeley ....................................................... Assistant Secretary. On this 23rd day of March A. D. 19Tq, before me personally came Charles B. Watson , Vico-President of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and W. B. M. Eingeley • Assistant Secretary of said Company, with both of who I am uany ecgoa-red, who being "by me severally duly sworn, acid that they, the acid Charles B. Watson and W • c • M • E 1 n g e 1 e y were respectively the Vice•Przeident and the Assistant Secretary of the said UNITED STATES FIMLITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney; Lint they each knew the Beal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said Power of Attorney was such corporate seal, that it was so fixed by ord,,r of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that they signed their names thereto by like order as Vica•President and Assistant .Secretary, respectively, of the Company. My commission expires the first day in July, A. D. 1982.... (SEAL) (Signed) Margaret M. Hurst .................................... Notary Public STATE OF MARYLAND l Sct /T BALTIMORE CITY, I, William Allen , Clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City. which Court is a Court of Record, and has a scaL do hereby certify that Margaret M. Hurst • Fsquirs, before whom the annexed affidavits wen made, and who has thereto subscribed his name, was at the time of so doing a Notary Pubfic of the State of Marylecd, in and for the City of Baltimore, duly commissioned and swore end authorized by law to administer oelrs and take ceknowiedgmentc. or proof of deeds to be recorded therein. I further certify, that I am acquainted with the handwriting of the said Notary, and verily Lai eve the signature to be his genuine signature. in Twtltnnoy Whereof, I hereto rat my hand and affix the seal of the Superior Court of Baltimore Qy, the same being a Court of Record, this 23rd day of March . A. D. 19 T9 William Allen (SEAT:) (Signed)............................................................... Clerk of the Superior Cows of 841timore City. M 3 (a") U COPY OF RESOLUTION That Where;; it is necessary for the effectual transaction of business that this Company a and authority to set for it and in Its name in States other than MeTerritoriesp y ppoint agents end attorneys with power Maryland, and in the of the United States and in the Provinces Of the Dominion p( Ctinada and in the Colony of Newfoundland. There/ore,�7ie it Resolved, that this Company do, and it hereby does, authorize and empower its President or either of its Vice. Presidents in conjunction with its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretariat, under its corporate Deal, to appoint any person or persons as attorney or attorneys-imfecq or agent or agents of mid Company, in its name and as its act, to execute and deliver any and all can. tracts guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding positions of public or private trust, guaranteeing the performances of contracts other than insurance policies and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings, required or permitted in all actions or proceedings, or by law allowed, and . Alm, in its name and as its attorney or attor.,eyainfact, or agent or agents to execute and guarantee the conditions of any and all bonds, :ecognizeneee, obligations, stipulations, undertakings or anything in the nature of either of the same, which art or may by law, municipal or otherwise, or by any Statute of the United States or of any State or Territory of the United States or of the Provinces of the Dominion of Canada or of the Colony of Newfoundland, or by the rules, regulations, orders, customs, practice or discretion of any board, body, organimtion, office or officer, local, municipal or otherwise, be allowed, required or permitted to be executed, made, taken, given, tendered, accepted, filed or worded for the security or protection of, by or for any person or persons, corporation, body, office, interest, municipality or other association or organization whatsoever, in any and all capacities wharsover, conditioned for the doing or not doing of anything or any conditions which may be provided for in any such bond, recognizance, obligation, stipulation, or undertaking, or anything in theaature of either of the same. J. -Jame s M . Carroll , an Assistant Secretary of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND Mmid Company to Douglas Vrazel GUARANTY COMPANY, hereby that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original power of attorney given r, of Viotorias Texas authorizing and empowering him forth, which Power of attorney has never been revoked and iD still in full force and effect, to sign bonds an therein act And I do further certify that mid Power of Attorney was given in pursuance of a resolution adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Dimtors of mid Company, duly called and held at the office of the Company in the City of Baltimore, on the llth day of July, 1910, at which meeting a quorum of the Board oI Directors was present, and that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of mid resolution, and the whole thereof as recorded in the minutes of mid meeting. In Testimony Whereof, I haw: hereunto act my hand and the seal of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY on (Date) ....................................................... Assistant Secretary. CERTIFIC4TE OF INSURAMCE |DATE �10/03/91 PRODUCER |THlS CI::.RTlFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF I1, 1::iORMf ITIDIN PROFESSIONAL INS AGTS INC |O0L. A$o CONFERG NO RIiUlS UPOm THE CERTIFICATE P O BOX 2625 �HOLDER THlS CERTIFICAT� DDES NOT AMEND EXTEND VR VICTORIA TX 77902 1ALTER �HE COVERAqE AFFORDED BY THE POLI�lES RELD�� .� � � 512-578-Z691 |---------------------------------------------- FAX#512-378-7565 | COMPANIES AFl ING COVERA63E _.... ..... _________..... ..... ..... __..... ..... ___________ -----�--------------------|COMF�NY LETTER A TRANSCONTINENTAL OSURED|-----------..... .... -...... ---... .... .... ..... -------... ... .... --------... ..... .... .... --... .... ..... KINNEY CONSTRUCTION CO |COMPANY LETTER B TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 3961 |--------------------�---------------------------`---- VICTORIA, TX 77903 |COMPANY LETTER C |COMPANY LETTER D |-------------------------------�--------------------- |COMPANY LETTER E �.... ... ... . ..... . ..... .....�������������������� COVERAGE3 `�.... ... ��������� THIS I3 TO CER1I1-Y THA POLl IES 017 INSUPANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE �EEN ISSUED Ti..) THE INSURED NAM�D A8OVE FOR THE POLICY PFRIOD lNDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDlNG Al I REoUlREhENTTERn OR nONDzlzON Op ANY oON|RAcl OR oTHER DooUMENr WITH RESp2CT TO WHICH TH19 CFRTTFlCATE NAi BE 15SUE0 OR UA� PERrAlN, HIE lNSUCA�CE AFFOFU}ED BY THE POt HEeslU {s SUBa�CT Tg ALL THE lERHS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDITION5 OF SUCH POLlCIES CO | | | POLlCY | FOLICY | ALL LlMITS IN LTR| TYPE OF INSURANCE | POLICY NUMGER |EFF DATE|EXP DATE| TH��SANDS ---�--------------------|----�----------�--------�--------|--------------------- |GENERAL' LIABILITY |TPP9O6193306 :05/16/90�05/16/91!GEWERAL AGGREG�$1,O0O A ICr1M1IERCIAL G/I (PRODUCTS AGGREG$1,000 | [ ]CLAIMS [X]OCCR| | | |PERS & AD; IHJ.$ 500 | OWNE�&CONTRACTORS| | | (EACH OCCURREHCE$ 500 | ;FIF"E $ 50 MEDICAL 5 ---/-------... -.... ----------�--------------^�--------�--------|--------------------- TOMOGIL1-: LIASILITY|8�A70617-307 |05/16/90|05/16/91| A | ANY AUTO | | | |CSL $750 | A OWN,D AUTO3 | | � |--------------------- | X SCEDULED AUTO�,; |rX MlRED A,jTOS � | | |----------------~---- |[X NgN-OWNED AUTOS | | < |BI (ACCDNT> $ IN III $ --�--------------------|-�-------------|--------|--------|--------------------- |EXCESS |[ ]UMBRELLA FORM | | | |OCCURRENCE| AGGR1EGATE |[ ]OTHER THAN UMBR� | | | |$ |$ -__._..... ... ... ... __... ..... _..... _-___..... ... __�___-________-_-�_____-__|________�_____________________ | }506193308 05/16/90105/16/9115TATUTOR B |I'd ORKERS IOHi$10O EACH ACCIDENT |YAND | | | 1$500 IMLIT |EMFLOE100 EASE-EMP---|--------------------|---------------|--------|--------|--------`------------ |OTHER | | | | �..... ... �����..... �... ������.... ... ���������������..... ������`�.... .... �����������.... ... ������..... �`���� DESCRlPTlON OF �PERATl�NS/LOCATIGN��VEHlCLES/RE�TRlCTlONS/SPECIAL ITEMS CONSTRUCTION OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MAGNOLIA BEACH COMMUNITY, CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS PHASE II ���������..... ������������������..... ..... ���������..... ������������������... ..... ����.... .... .... �������� CERTIFlCA`[E HOLDER CANCELLATlON ... ... ..... �����.... ..... �........... ... ... �..... �����... ..... �����������.... �..... ..... �.... ��� 1 tSHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED | |�OLICI[�S I, CAN(�ELL�D D��ORE TMI:- [XPIF11- i |ATION DATE THEREOF, TKE ISSUIN(3 COhPANY | �NILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 �AYS WRITTEN ( |NtjTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDf"C N�MED | |TO LEFT, BU[ i:AILURE TO MAIL SUCH | �N(]TICE S|�ALL IM S lGATION gR | �LlA�ILI ANY | THE COMPANY, COMMISSIONERS' COURT OF T ; |IS � REF VES� CALHDUN COUNTY, TEXAS | �--- --- ------..... ..... .... ... ---- 211 S. ANN ST. | <AUTI E ORT LAVACA, TX 77979 -----------------'-----------'------------77--------�r-----... .... _..... ..... _____.... .... .... .... Calhoun County • Magnolia Beach Phase Two Wastewater Collection System Improvements OWNER -CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of the 14'- day of LdLL in the year 1991 by and between the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County, Texas (hereinafter called OWNER), and McKinney Construction Company of Victoria, Texas (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: Article 1. WORK. CC:QTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as follows Construction of Wastewater Collection System Improvements for the • Magnolia Beach Community; Calhoun County, Texas. Article 2. ENGINEER. The Project has been designed by Testengeer, Inc., who is hereinafter called ENGINEER and who will assume all duties and responsibilities and will have the rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract documents in connection with completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. . Article 3. INSPECTOR. The Calhoun County Commissioner, Pct. 1 is designated as primary contact and representative of the Calhoun County, and will assume all duties and responsibilities and will have the rights and authority assigned to INSPECTOR in the Contract Documents in connection with completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Article 4. CONTRACT TIME. 4.1 The Work will be substantially completed within 90 calendar days after the date the • Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 2.3, as amended, of the General Conditions. The Work will be complete and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 14.13 of the General Conditions within 120 calendar days after the date the -892 4.2 Liquidated Damages. OWNER and CONTRACTOR recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and the OWNER will suffer financial loss if the Work is not substantially complete within the time specified in paragraph 4.1 above, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with Article 12 of the General Conditions. They also recognize the delays, expense and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by OWNER if the Work is not substantially complete on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any • such proof, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty) CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER Five Hundred Dollars substantial completionuntil the that Work s substantially cres after the time omplete. in paragraph 4.1 for Article 5 CONTRACT PRICE. 5.1 OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents in current funds as follows: One Hundred Seventy- three Thousand, Ninety-six and 70/100 Dollars ($173,096.70). Article 6 PAYMENT PROCEDURES. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article 14 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by Director of Utilities as provide in the General Conditions. CA Progress Payments. OWNER shall make progress payr"p.nts on account of the C:;ntrak:t Price on the basis of CONTRACTOR's Apnlicz Lions for Payment as recommended by The County Commissioner, on or about the twenty-fifth (25th) day of each month during construction as provided below. All progress payments will be on the basis of the progress of the Work measured by the schedule of values provided for in paragraph 14.1 of the General Conditions. 6.1.1 Prior to Substantial completion progress payments will be in an amount equal to 90 percent of The Work completed, and 90 percent of materials and equipment not incorporated in the Work but delivered and suitably • stored, less in each case the aggregate of payments previously made. 6.1.2 Upon Substantial Completion, OWNER shall pay an amount sufficient to increase total payments to CONTRACTOR to 95 percent of the contract Price, less such amount as The County Commissioner shall determine in accordance with paragraph 14.7 0£ the General Conditions. 6.2 Final Payment. Upon final completion and acceptance of the Work in accordance with paragraph 14.13 of the General Conditions, OWNER shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by The County Commissioner as provided in said paragraph 14.13. Article 7 INTEREST. All moneys not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at the maximum rate allowed by law at the place of the Project. Article S CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS. In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: fM C� Contract Price as recommended by The County Commissioner as provided in said • paragraph 14.13. Article 7. INTEREST. All moneys not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at the maximum rate allowed by law at the place of the Project. Article 8. CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS. In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: 8.1 CONTRACTOR has familiarized himself with the nature and extent of the Contract Documents, Work, locality, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Work. 3.2 CONTRACTOR has studies carefully all reports of investigations and tests of subsurface. and latent physical conditions at the site or otherwise affecting cost, progress or performance of the Work which were relied upon by ENGINEER in the preparation of • the Draadngs and Specifications and which have been identified in i:he Supplementary Conditions. 8.3 CONTRACTOR has made or caused to be made examinations, investigations and tests and studies of such reports and related data in addition to those referred to in paragraph 7.2 as he deems necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, - within the Contract Time and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents; and no additional examinations, investigations, tests, reports or similar data are or will be required by CONTRACTOR for such purposes. 8.4 CONTRACTOR has correlated the results of all such observations, examinations, investigations, tests, reports and at a with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. 8.5 CONTRACTOR has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors or discrepancies that he has discovered in the Contract Documents and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. Article 9. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between OWNER and CONTRACTOR are attached to this Agreement, made a part hereof and consists of the following: • 9.1 CONTRACTOR's Bid (pages A-1 to A-6, inclusive) marked exhibit. kID 9.2 Documentation submitted by CONTRACTOR prior to Notice of Award (pages to _, inclusive). 9.3 This Agreement (pages B-3 to B-5, inclusive). 9.4 Performance Bond. 9.5 Payment Bond. • 9.6 Maintenance Bond. 9.7 Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract (44 pages). 9.8 Supplementary Conditions (pages C-1 to C-4). 9.9 Notice of Award. 9.10 Notice to Proceed. 9.11 Specifications bearing the title "Project Manual for Calhoun County Wastewater Collection System Improvements, Magnolia Beach Phase Two", and consisting of 3 divisions, as listed in table of contents thereof. 9.12 Drawings, consisting of nine (9) sheets, with each sheet bearing the following general title: Wastewater System Improvements, Magnolia Beach Phase Two. 9.13 Addenda numbers 1 to 2, inclusive. 9.14 Any Modification, including Change Orders, duly delivered after execution of Agreement. • 9.15 There are no Contract Documents other than those listed in this Article 9. The Contract Documents may only be altered, amended or repealed by a Modification (as defined in Section 1 of the General Conditions). Article 10. MISCELLANEOUS 10.1 Terms used in this Agreement which are defined in Article 1 of the General Conditions shall have the meanings indicated in the General Conditions. 10.2 No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract Documents will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and specifically both within limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extend that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment no assignment will release or discharge to assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 10.3 OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns m • and legal representatives to the other party thereto, his partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. Article 11. OTHER PROVISIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement in triplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER, CONTRACTOR and ENGINEER. All portions of the contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or by ENGINEER or their behalf. This Agreement will be effective on Zq- 1991 OWNER Ca un Co y, xas CONTRACTOR McKinney Construction Co. By By Hoil&4W40 , County Judge . (CORPORATE SEAL) " Attest Attest n1E.�, County Clerk Address for giving notices 211 S. Ann Street Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Address for giving notices P. O. Box 3961 Victoria, Texas 77904 (If OWNER is a public, body, attach evidence of authority to sign and resolution or other document authorizing execution of Agreement). IM 0 AYFORNEY'S REVIEW CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, SE��+In l�_ the duly authorized and acting legal representative of the Calhoun County Commissioners' Court, do hereby certify as follows: • I have examined the attached contract(s) and suety bonds and am of the opinion that each of the aforesaid agreements may be duly executed by the proper parties thereto acting through their duly authorized representatives; that said representatives have full power and authority to execute said agreements on behalf of the respective parties Paine thereon; and that the foregoing agreements shall constitute v ' and legally binding obligations upon the parties eXAutingy/he ame in accordance with terms, conditions and provisionX i 11 THE COURT ADJOURNED. • 89'7 REGULAR OCTOBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the th there was begun and holden at th Lavaca, said County and State, a the Commissioners' Court, within there were present on this date to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Opal M. Hayes HELD OCTOBER 21, 1991 e 21st day of e Courthouse t 10:00 A.M., said County the following October, A.D. 1991, in the City of Port a REgular Term of and State, and members of the Court, County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pct. 4 Deputy County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. RESOLUTION-HB 66-COUNTY COURT AT LAW JUDGE A motion was made by Judge Hartzog and seconded by Commissioner Mikula to approve the Resolution pertaining to salary increases for Judges of the County Courts at Law, and that the County Judge be authorized to sign the Resolution and the County Clerk be instructed to mail Certified copy of Resolution to the Comptroller of Public Accounts. Judge Hartzog, Commissioner Mikula and Commissioner Smith voted for the Resolution. Commissioner Belk and Commissioner Hahn voted against the Resolution Motion carried. • LJ 0 • RESOLUTION The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, having considered the terms of H.B. 66 passed by the 72 Legislature, Regular Session, 1991, effective October 1, 1991, made the following determinations: H.B. 66 has provided uniform minimum jurisdiction for all County Courts at Law in Texas. H.B. 66 has provided an optional local increase in court costs to underwrite certain salary increases for the judges of the County Courts at Law. H.B. 66 directs the State Comptroller to deposit all additional court costs assessed by the various counties electing to take advantage of the provisions of H.B. 66 in the Judicial Fund, an impressed fund of the State of Texas for the exclusive support of the State Judiciary. H.B. 66 directs the State Comptroller, commencing September 1, • 1992, to pay to those participating counties electing to assess the court costs and depositing the same with the State, the sum of $25,000.00 per Court at Law in 12 equal monthly increments commencing September 1, 1992, and continuing on the 1st day of each successive month thereafter through August 1, 1993 and for as long thereafter as the respective participating county annually elects to assess the additional court costs. H.B. 66 provides each participating county shall pay to its County Court at Law Judge or Judges at least the sum of $20,000.00 plus the salary.effective in the first year the respective county elects to participate plus one-half of any rebate it receives at the end of each State fiscal year. H.B. 66 provides each county shall use the funds remaining from the $25,000.00 and the rebate for the purose of supporting the County Court at Law judiciary. H.B. 66 provides, to participate a county a resolution adopting the additional court month period and file with the Comptrolle • Texas a copy of said resolution not later preceding the 12 month period during which are to be collected. must annually pass costs for a 12 r of the State of than June 1 immediately the fees and costs -2- The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County has determined to • exercise its option to participate under the terms of N.B. 66 for the period from July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. Now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners Court of Calhoun County,_ Texas, to wit: 1. The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, elects to particpate under the terms of H.B. 66. 2. The Commissioners Court of Calhoun County, Texas, assesses in addition to current fees and court costs, a) The sum of $20.00 in each civil case filed in the Calhoun County Court at Law No. 1. b) The sum of $10.00 shall be paid by a person upon conviction of any criminal offense in the Calhoun County Court at Law No. 1, including cases in which probation or deferred adjudication is granted. Convictions arising • under Chapter 173, Act of the 47th Legislature, Regular Session, 1941 (Art 6687b.. Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) or a conviction under the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways (Art 6701d Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) is included except that a conviction arising under any law that regulates pedestrians or the parking of motor vehicles is not included. c) The County Clerk of Calhoun County is instructed to collect said fees and costs and shall send the fees at least monthly to the State Comptroller for deposit into the Judicial Fund. 900 0 -3- 3. The County Clerk of Calhoun County is instructed to file a certified copy of this resolution immediately and to request from the State Comptroller written acknowledgment of the receipt of same. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of October , 1991. Marlene Paul, County C^1erk,Calhoun County,Tx t e!ft cY1]. Deputy Attu 901 ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY Claims totaling $1,157,888.78 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a Motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said claims be approved for payment. TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT The Tax Assessor -Collector presented her monthly reports for the month of August, and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that said report be approved. The Tax Assessor -Collector presented her monthly report for September and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said report be approved. BUDGET AMENDMENT -SHERIFF'S DEPT -VARIOUS GENERAL FUND DEPTS. Motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following Budget Amendments for the Sheriff's Dept. and Various General Fund Depts. be approved. BUDGET ANNDNNT REQUEST 11 To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (I t7& (bl b,,A M'n (Department making this req est) Date: C / C I request an amendment to the _ � _ budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account 0 Account Name - Amount (1-720 Crr IfI2 j�(SIJC144 JCIr Net change in total budget for this department is: Other remarks/justification: Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Lommissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/Department head: P 9a2 Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to Ueneral Ledger account(s): I�BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTI • To: Calhoun County` Commissioners' Court From: (Department making this re�juest) Date: 10- a- III je dj-,46 � /,< T- t6 *&Ppld' A �k `11f5o� I request an amendment to the f ill budget for the !(year following line items in my department: ,l !� Amendment GL Account-Aobount Name Amount Reason ------- ---- ------- — --------- ------------- ------------------- ,1ILt_ • Net change in total budget for this department is: $ Other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval:. �J • Date posted to General Ledger account(s): THE COURT ADJOURNED. 9J3 SPECIAL OCTOBER TERM HELD OCTOBER 31, 1991 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF CALHOUN j BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 31st day of October, A.D., 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Special Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner, Pct. 1 Stanley Mikula Commissioner, Pct. 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner, Pct. 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner, Pct. 4 Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. BIDS 6 PROPOSALS -FUEL FOR MONTH OF NOVEMBER The following bids were received for fuel for the month of November, and after reviewing said bids a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the low bid of Diebel Oil Company be accepted. FUEL BID PROPOSAL Is IN RESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UNDERSIGNED PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND DELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATE IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALLON X APPROXIMATE = TOTAL GALLONS/MO. $ 1710 X 2800 = $ oin, UNLEADED GASOLINE PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE $ /7's �3 X 3000 = $on�C� $ X 2500 = $ MI-22�s: DIESEL FUEL TOTAL BID PRICE $ &/0 � THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING WILL. BE ALLOWED NOVEMBER 1, DURING 1991 AND ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: t pgeL ADDRESS IC/) I ) CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE DATE I(^->>1-n 904 V L I - j o f— d l i t-1 U 1 U- 1 u . FL-_ L. L l I 'J I v. _ , $UEL BID PROPOSAL SRESPONSE TO YOUR NOTICE FOR COMPETITIVE AIDS FOR FUEL WE THE UND$RSIGNED OPOSE TO FURNISH AND 4OHDELIVER THE FOLLOWING FUELS TO THE LOCATIONS INDICATE D IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PRICE/GALOH X APPROXIMATE x TOTAL GA LLONS /MO. UNLEADED GASOLINE .6 Jr8 $_i X 2800 $ D PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINEX 3000 = $ DIESEL FUEL .(I $ ,7g� X 2500 $ 00 TOTAL DID PRICE THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BE FOR A ONE MONTH PERIOD ONLY BEGINNING NOVEMBER 1, 1991 AND ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 1991. NO PRICE CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. SELLER WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE INVOICES ON EACH PURCHASE TO THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. PRICES QUOTED DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. NAME OF BIDDER: DRESS CITY, $TATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER : AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE! TITLE DATE e, c. Mml9 S PEJ60K-C-'7, /yt 9005,, BIDS & PROPOSALS- TRACTOR-PCT. ONE The following bids were received for a tractor for Pct. One, and it was decided this would be tabled and the bid be awarded on November 12, 1991. W. A. VIRNAU & SONS, INC. Massey -Ferguson — Kubota UTI Sales and Service Box 818 Sealy, Texas 77474 Phone:409/885-3549 Houston Direct: 391-3949 October 21, 1991 B. H. COMISKEY, JR. C.P.A County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Tx. 77979 KUBOTA Box 795 Eagle Lake, Texas 77434 Phone:409/234-5312 Please find enclosed our bid for a new Massey Ferguson 375 diesel tractor. Diesel Engine - 60 PTO H.P. 12V Alt. 45 Amp Live Hydraulics 14GPM @2200 RPM 12 Speed Transmission Independent 540 PTO Hour Meter Fuel Gauge . Temperature Gauge Engine Oil Pressure Warning Light Alternator Warning Light Air Cleaner Restriction Warning Light CAT II 3 Point Hitch Three Way Remote Valve Total Bid F.O.B. Pct. #1 $18,879.00 Thank you for the opportunity to bid on this tractor. Sincerely, KJJames A. Schroeder r1 L_J is 9V6 L • • W. A. VIRNAU & SONS, INC. Massey -Ferguson — Kubota Sales and Service Box 818 Sealy, Texas 77474 Phone:409/885-3549 Houston Direct: 391-3949 October 21, 1991 B. H. COMISKEY,JR. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 KUBOTA Box 795 Eagle Lake, Texas 77434 Phone:409/234-5312 Please find enclosed our bid for a new Massey Ferguson 383 tractor. Diesel Engine 73 PTO H.P. 12V Alt. 45 Amps Live Hydraulics 9.5 GPM @2200 RPM 8 Speed Transmission Live PTO 540 Hour Meter Fuel Gauge Temperature Gauge Engine Oil Pressure Warning Light Alt. Warning Light Air Cleaner Restrictor Warning Light CAT II 3 Point Three Way Remote Valve Total Bid F.O.B. Pet. #1 $17,750.00 Sincerely, �% o OJames A. Schroeder 90 W. A. VIRNAU & SONS, INC. Massey -Ferguson — Kubota UUD Sales and Service Box 818 Sealy, Texas 77474 Phone:409/885-3549 Houston Direct: 391-3949 October 21, 1991 B. H. COMISKEY, JR. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 n U KUBOTA Box 795 Eagle Lake, Texas 77434 Phone:409/234-5312 Please find enclosed our bid for a new Long 2610 Diesel Tractor. Diesel Engine 64 PTO H.P. 12V Alt. 35 Amp Live Hydraulics 9GPM @2200 RPM 8 Speed Transmission Independent 540 PTO Hour Meter Fuel Gauge Temperature Gauge Engine Oil Pressure Warning Light Alternator Warning Light Air Cleaner Restriction Warning Light CAT II 3 Point Hitch Three Way Remote Valve Total Bid F.O.B. Pct. #1 $13,750.00 'thank you for the opprotunity to bid on this tractor. Sincerely, r L-James A. Schroeder C� NUECES FORD TRACTOR, INC. • 9030 IH 37, P.O. Box 10268, Corpus Christi, Texas 78460-0268 • Telephone 512-241-3211 10/16/91 B.H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor - Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Tx, 77979 Dear Sir, Following is our bid for a tractor as per your specifications) FORD, model 5610 Special tractor W/ all standard equipment to meet your specifications plus a 3-spool valve, tender mounted, suitable to operate a bat -wing mower, • Delivery -- less than 20 days yours, ul / Cliff Unger Nueces Ford Tractor,Inc. $160996.00 r.; 909 TRACTORS EQUIPMENT TELITHONE (512) 575 0161 FARM -INDUSTRIAL COMPANY TOM O'CONNOR. JR., PRESIDENT -JOCK ROSS. MAN/ GER P.u.EOxxKm 36 VICI'ONA,ITxAS 77902 October 11, 1991 B. H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann St. - County Courthouse Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 Dear Sir: We are pleaded to submit for your consideration the following quotation: 1 - New 5610 Special Ford Tractor 1 Standard Remote Valve 1 - 3 way Remote Valve Bid Price: $16,281.00 The above tractor will be fully serviced and ready for immediate use and it will be covered by the standard warranty as set forth by Ford New Holland, Inc. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this quotation and we will appreciate your acceptance. Yours very truly, FARM -INDUSTRIAL COMPANY Alv sek Sales Representative Enc m FORD QUALITY PARTS AND SERVICE TRACTORS • EQUIPMENT .910 • JACKSON COUNTY EQUIPMENT CO. liiM 401 EAST MAIN - P. 0. DRAWER F - EDNA, TEXAS 77957 PHONE 7023543 695 CASE INTERNATIONAL UTILITY 62 H.P. WITH THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: FLAT FENDERS 8 SPEED SYNCHROMESH - 8 FORWARD / 4 REAR SPEEDS DUAL P.T.O. - 1000 & 540 3 POINT HITCH - CATEGORY II ADJUSTING FRONT AXLE - 750-16 TIRES REAR TIRES - 16-9-3OR1 ADDITIONAL: 3 WAY HYDRAULIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE HYDRAULIC PUMP - 15.8 GALLON P.M. AT 2500 P.S.I. FUEL GAUGE TEMPERATURE GAUGE ENGINE OIL PRESSURE WARNING LIGHT ALTERNATOR WARNING LIGHT • AIR CLEANER RESTRICTION LIGHT 45 AMP. ALTERNATOR (WE WOULD MOUNT 50 AMP IF NEEDED) HOUR METER THIS TRACTOR HAS A 12 MONTH WARRANTY OR 1500 HOURS WARRANTY THE TOTAL PRICE FOR THIS TRACTOR, PLUS DELIVERY AND SERVICE, IS: $15,612.00 • 911 CLgRK• SOUTHWEST LIFT, INC. 4001 PAN AM EXPRESSWAY • SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78219 • 512/224-4641 L./^finn out^ SALES/ORDER DESK 1-800-289-LIFT ❑ San Antonio, Texas 78220 ❑ Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 ❑ Pharr, Texas 78577 ❑ Laredo, Texas 78041 P.O. Box 200464 5519 MCArdle F 110 916 East Expy. 83 Mines & N. Santa Maria FAX (512) 224-7909 (512)289-1611 (512)781-5964 (512)722-0988 TO: B.H. Comiskey, Jr. C.P.A. County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas 211 S. Ann - County Courthouse Dale Oslabon Number Y. low" Number Port MLavaca, Texas Comiske7 979 C.P.A. 110-28-91 I HW-400-91 ATTENTION: We are pleased to submit the following quotation for your consideration: QUANTITY 1 EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS i. ,. ,:; r .'•.: ' .-5 I, ,�: PRICE EA., ...; TOTAL 1 New Kubota M6950F Utility Tractor With: 3 Spool Valves SELLING PRICE: (excluding taxes) $18,629.00 TERMS: NET 10 DAYS FOB, • This question is subject to acceptance by buyer and seller within days from the dale hereof and only in accordance with the terms stated on the front and • reverse sides hereof. Buyer grants to seller a security Interest in equipment described herein until payment has been made in lull. ACCEPTED BY SELLER: SOUTHWEST LIFT, INC. COMPANY USE ONLY NAME TITLE This Ouofahon shall become a contract oNy upon signature by Division executive officer or )[her authorized representative of Seller at its business offices.) COMPANY (Signolwe of aNMrized olloof o, representative requiredI QUO SUBMIT) Y' 1 ' Homer websuer SALESMAN Subject to local and state taxes where applicable QUOTATION [�E 912 J. C BROWN, INC. P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 4918 433 nab Rd. Highway 83 & 1" Rd. San Juan, Texas 70589 BOMAG Corpus51, Texas 76469 787.0001 RAMMAX54149131 ls12) izl 2as-o7v 4283983 WACKER LO • AUTHORIZED DEALER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT and PARTS FIELD and SHOP OCTOBER 28, 1991 To: Mr. B. H. Comiskey, Jr..CPA County Auditor Calhoun County, Texas Port Lavaca, Texas 77979 From: Glenn G. Fenner Subject: "SEALED BID" - T R A C T O R 10:00 AM, THURSDAY, October 31,1991 Dear Mr. Comiskey: J. C. Brown, Inc. is proud to offer Calhoun County our bid on our JOHN DEERE Model 2355 Utility Tractor, The 2355 meets or exceeds all of the specifications published by the county for this bid. Our 2355 Specification Sheet is enclosed with this bid, • 1 - New Model 2355 John Deere Tractor FOB Calhoun County--------------$14,688.00 This unit can be delivered in 90 days from the receipt of a order for the County. The Manufacturer"s Standard Limited Warranty is six months on the complete Unit and additional 18 months on the Engine/Power Train limited to 3000 hours use, Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to the County, Respectfully, /Glenn G.(Fenner J. C. BROWN, INC. • 91� CASE III SALES QUOTATION AGRICULTURAL EQUIPTMENT • IV1LLlf1rl5 rnl<m hwu.L "lr'lbllj' DRAWER J NAME OF CUSTOMER ------------ PHONE TIVOLI, TX 77990 512-286-3571Comiskey, Jr. C. P. A. ADDRESS ---------------------- DATE FIRM NAME Gninty ltu(litor Cal_h�un County,'.1'e5:ro.s SALESMAN TOWN ---------- STATE -------- COUNTY R. ''3illiams K PHONE H - 512-236-3571 --------- QUANTITY --------- ------------------------------------ ---- MACHINES & SERIAL VS -----------------------=------------------------------------------ ------------ LIST PRICE ------ ----- - SALE PRICE I CascliI Tractor liode.l. 695 10609h 00 62 I)TO Horsepower Fuel Tank: 20 [,allons FOPS: 2 -Post oath 2 in. ceo n . 3-3pced ;synchromesh Transmission Vorcmr { • 4- iTrT verse I6iiltI, Livc Ily(irau].ics: 15.8 Puma '�L 250).P31 540 fill Independerit PTO Hour meter Fuel Gauge M. Lhg:i.ue oi]. pressure darning light Alternator for warning light Lti.r cleaner restriction siarni_n„ .1.1l;ht Catcpory 11 `Phree point hitch 7.50-1 Front Tires 16.9-30 Peas Ait,, n.,tul- 12,V 50 nllw Th.rec-ray remote contrel vnl.ve n:i_th Ll?I �?e W)'UIi remote femsl.e couplers-i_usta_1100 ou irarLor Furnish pasts and slir)p service mranuril. • 914 • REMANUFACTURED R & F R0• VENDOR/ EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY MAINT. MAINT. TERMS QUOTE EQUIP. TYPE COST COST YEAR 1 YEAR 2 EXP. DATE GILBERT/ 145,000 0 6 MO PARTS - - 20% DOWN 11/11/91 REMANU. 1 YR LABOR GE 625II SEMPCO/ 139,900 0 1 YR PARTS - - 20% DOWN 11/01/91 REMAND. 1 YR LABOR 70% @ DEL. GE 62511 10% @ COMPLETION IMAGING 202,275 0 1 YR PARTS - - 50% DOWN N / A DIAGNOSTICS/ 1 YR LABOR 50% @ COMPLETION REMANU. GE 625II IMAGING 181,000 0 30 DAY PARTS 15,000 - 50% DOWN N / A DIAGNOSTICS/ 30 DAY LABOR 50% @ COMPLETION USED RFX SYSTEM OPT. 1 IMAGING 121,000 0 30 DAY PARTS 10,000 - 50% DOWN N / A DIAGNOSTICS/ 30 DAY LABOR 50% @ COMPLETION USED RFX SYSTEM OPT. 2 OTHER GILBERT/ 156,000 0 6 MO PARTS - - 10% DOWN 11/11/91 TOSHIBA & LABOR 70% @ SHIPMENT KDU 90/15 R & F SYSTEM 20% @ 1ST USE PERFORMANCE 190,500 0 IMAGING/ SHIMADZU 90/90 R/F SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 218,700 0 IMAGING/ t SHIMADZU 90/15 R/F SYSTEM 1 YR PARTS - (EXCLUDING GLASSWARE.) 1 YR LABOR 20% DOWN 10/23/91 70% @ DELIVERY 10% @ COMPLETION 1 YR PARTS - - 20% DOWN 10/23/91 (EXCLUDING GLASSWARE) 70% @ DELIVERY 1 YR LABOR 10% @ COMPLETION • y cn3a as -ten 3> p 9 C m C O w m m O (D r r� rt r FS rr c r i C � nr•(D67 o r•c = -O C O to c r•� n r•rw = r•E w r• p w CD O w N O n c = m O s � crow c� a w y n c n G cg O r G w C r• r• n ti O ?G c r•ac a n cow y r.awecu ti��= r 7 fD 3 't r- O r• C. cn `G X (D < m(D a "(D n N r •• 7 r• m G n rr 7 ?'+ O r G' C m r, w r-• �,. ,- n r a y r• r• -• m m 7 0 r• moo C•; o r• n � r'v E �• r• r•,v - Z G-G i-?? m m m m Cc.0 o-x rm 3 3 3 m m m O n p rr m o n n n- o c o am (D rt w m O C n G m cn � m o- � � p a. r.c0 c-m c> � R rt w Ri M't rtr cl 3 n rt m Z m (D r• y p-d C m O X O - m m c c n "7 G C c CT7 • • • RELOCATION AND REINSTALLATION OF EXISTING RADIOLOGY EQUIPMENT VENDOR EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY MAINT. MAINT. TERMS QUOTE OTHER COST COST YEAR 1 YEAR 2 EXP. DATE IMAGING 0 25,000 LABOR ONLY - - 50% DOWN DIAGNOSTICS 50% @ COMPLETION SEMPCO 0 19,275 90 DAY - - 20% DOWN 11/1/91 LABOR ONLY BAL. @ COMPLETION GILBERT 0 25,768 90 DAY - - 10/27/91 X-RAY LABOR ONLY • • • MOTORIZED X-RAY VIEWER VENDOR/ EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY MAINT. MAINT. TERMS QUOTE OTHER EQUIP. TYPE COST COST YEAR 1 YEAR 2 EXP. DATE GILBERT 13,500 0 6 MO. PARTS - - 10% DOWN 10/27/91 XRAY/ & LABOR 70% @ DEL. MV 3000 20% @ COMPLETION PERFORMANCE 15,280 0 6 MO. PARTS - - 20% DOWN 10/26/91 IMAGING/ & LABOR 70% @ DEL. MV 3000 10% @ COMPLETION SEMPCO/ 0 0 1 YR PARTS - - 20% DOWN 11/1/91 MV 4000 & LABOR BAL. @ COMPLETION *** NOTE: SEMPCO WILL PROVIDE, AT NO CHARGE, AN MV 4000 MOTORIZED X-RAY VIEWER VALUED AT $23,889.00, AS PART OF A PROMOTIONAL EFFORT TO HAVE A REMANUFACTURED X-RAY SYSTEM TO DEMO IN THIS AREA. • • • VENDOR/ EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY EQUIP. TYPE COST COST SURGICAL LIGHTS x 4 AMSCO 52,000 ** 2 YR PARTS & LABOR MDT CASTLE 47,190 2,080 2 YR PARTS & LABOR FLASH STERILIZER x 1 AMSCO 21,682 ** MDT CASTLE 25,985 838 WARMING CABINETS x 2 AMSCO 7,740 ** MDT CASTLE 11,356 502 SURGICAL TABLE x 2 AMSCO 31,380 ** MDT CASTLE 41,614 N/C SURGICAL EQUIPMENT MAINT. MAINT.. TERMS QUOTE OTHER YEAR 1 YEAR 2 EXP. DATE ** NOTE: AMSCO GIVES AN INSTALLATION BID FOR ALL EQUIPMENT AT $5,100 NET 30 11/9/91 NET 45 VENDOR EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY COST COST 3 T& T 111,015.10 0 1 YR TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT MAINT. MAINT. YEAR 1 YEAR 2 10,048.80 TERMS QUOTE EXP. DATE 12/14/91 ATE 88,200.00 0 1 YR - 8,784.00 30% DOWN 12/31/91 70% @ COMPLETION OTHER N PURIFIER TOTAL EXHAUST (HOOD) VENDOR EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY MAINT. MAINT. COST COST YEAR 1 YEAR 2 BAXTER 8,052 N/A 2 YR PARTS - & LABOR CURTIN MATHESON 8,438 N/A DID NOT SPECIFY - - TERMS QUOTE EXP. DATE 8/15/92 OTHER 0 cq r..J • • • VENDOR/ EQUIP. INSTALL. WARRANTY EQUIP.TYPE COST COST Abbott 45,865.50 0 2 YR IMMUNOASSAY ANALYZER MAINT. MAINT. TERMS QUOTE OTHER YEAR 1 YEAR 2 EXP. DATE RESOLUTION - IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 4 (RE: PRISON BEDS) A motion was made by Judge Hartzog, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the Court adopt the Resolution in support of Proposition 4 on November 5th ballot. R E S O L U T I O N IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 4, NOVEMBER 5, 1991 BALLOT WHEREAS, the lack of available state Qrison space has caused the early release of violet criminals and is threatening the public safety; and WHEREAS, the lack of available state prison space has resulted in over 12,000 convicted felons being housed in county jails; and WHEREAS, Calhoun County is currently housing paper -ready convicted felons; and WHEREAS, Proposition 4, if approved, will authorize the issuance of up to $1.1 billion in general obligation bonds to be used for prison construction; and WHEREAS, if the voters of Texas do grant the authority to begin construction, 13,300 maximum security prison beds and 12,000 beds dedicated for substance abuse treatment of non-violent drug offenders will be constructed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT WE, the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County, do hereby support Proposition 4 which would provide bonded financing for 25,300 new prison beds for the State of Texas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hand and caused the seal of Calhoun County to be ffixed this 31st day of October, A. D. 199 . Howafd G. H tzog, Coun y Ju ge Leroy B I k, , Commiss oner, Precinct 1 Helen Smith, Commissioner, Precinct 3 7t6n ey i u , Commissioner, Precinct 2 0 car Hahn, Commissioner, Precinct 4 • • • 922 CALHOUN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT DIRECTORS A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula that Calhoun County cast 173 votes each for each of the following nominees for Directors of Calhoun County Appraisal District: Richard Barton, Leonard E. Dreymala, George Miller, Jessie Rodriguez and Sue Traylor. Motion carried. BUDGET AMENDMENTS- LIBRARY -SHERIFF DEPT- COUNTY COURT AT LAW - ROAD & BRIDGE PCT. TWO • Motion by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the following Budget Amendments be approved. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (ell (Department making this request) Date: I 0 _ 31 _'1 1 I request an amendment to the J4c1 budget for the year following line items in my department: GL Account # 01-6000: -�Iol �f-LO0°i-64AI Amendment Account Name Amount Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: Reason • I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: A 6 Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 0GT 3 11991 C61) 920 11 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (Department making this request) Date: IO - Q'I CI I request an amendment to the budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account if Account Name Amount �I c�loo3�153 Ugqo �t�sL�nnD Jlnn. Net change in total budget for this department is: $---��--- Other remarks/justification: Reason ��t b J)C, r, I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): IJ w 31091 n U 924 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST, To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court p 1 1 • From: () l�191L, � \ � •( C "� - (FL (Department making this request) Date: 10 --3o -111 I request an amendment to the �L))� budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount - ------------------------------ ------------- Ol bolo-�I'Iu., ILfCOL1000 QI-�0141 - ��1dCl t yj � Qn�ni�Arrn"n. o I - � 10 Net change in total budget for this department is: other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): • Reason ------------------- until 3 1 1991 925 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun county Commissiorners' Court From: l �Au'cl4y, (�1 (Department' aking this request) Date: I Q 10 _ GI I request an amendment to the ICICII budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount O 1-95oo-U95o _ �QTS �7 IL tOo -61/o/ ic�D y s4BNet change in total budget for this department is: ------------- other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be Commissioners' Court approval is obta Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): Reason_ snAorl r�Yl1Gu.•k� AV a 1 � �a � �i1Cvt. —b - as requested until AJ OCT • ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- COUNTY Claims totaling $ 154,139.46 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by • Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - HOSPITAL Claims totaling $ 434,677.08 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that said claims be approved for payment. BUDGET AMENDMENT- CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 926 Motion by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and .:arriod that the following Budge AmcndmonC be approved . (BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST) To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: (Departm nt making this request) Date: • I request an amendment to the year)_ — budget for the year following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount _ Reason 000 l X(A/ti CLI o, (- i Net change in total budget for this department is: $ • other remarks/justification: I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. i Signature of official/department head: per; Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Q Date posted to General Ledger account s THE COURT ADJOURNED. • 927 REGULAR NOVEMBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS I I COUNTY OF CALHOUN [ HELD NOVEMBER 12, 1991 • BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 12th day of November, A.D. 1991, there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog Leroy Belk Stanley Mikula Helen J. Smith Oscar F. Hahn Marlene Paul County Judge Commissioner,Pct.l Commissioner,Pct 2 Commissioner,Pct 3 Commissioner,Pct.4 County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of allegiance. After the meeting was called to order the Judge recessed to Courtroom "B" to'allow for the crowd present. FORMOSA PLASTICS -REPORT Formosa gave a presentation on their waste minimization initiative. Jay Su and Bob Wallace gave a report. The Court re -convened in ----_-Commissioners' Courtroom. C J • BIDS & PROPOSALS- SHERIFF VEHICLES • r1 L J • The following bids were taken and it was decided that the Auditor, County Judge and Sheriff would study the bids and they would be awarded November 15, 1991. SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE (1) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least 103 1.03.5 Engine: V-6 Brakes: Standard power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Standard automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Beater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Battery: 41eavyxy9tty,,x(4,Rxmcnth) std. hattery Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Standard Interior: cloth Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Standard equipment Floormat: Carpet Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Standard equipment Cigarette lighter: standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Standard equipment Radio: AM/FM Cassette factory installed Paint: Solid color Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Standard equipment Mirrors: Outside mirrors, one on driver's side and passenger's side Cruise Control: Standard equipment MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: 1992 Plymouth Acclaim TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT $12,521.55 Seats one on NET PRICE, AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE:12,521.55 less trade 700, VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: 'TUPAT, W/IN9PT_7)C7ION/DOC FEE T,ESS TRADE $11,212.30 '84 FORD LIC# 534720 VIN# 1FABP43G7EZ154895 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS): 90 Days approximately The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present car. BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY • FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLE(S) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. CIE BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME:Main Chrvsler Plcmnuth • ADDRESS:QnR West Main CITY, STATE, ZIP: Port Tavaca, Texas 77c)7Q AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: a""z TITLE: Sales PHONE NUMBER: S12/F52-67d1 • mi • SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE (1) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least 103 106.0 W/T1 Engine: V-6 3.OT, Vr, Brakes: Standard power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Standard automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Battery: Heavy duty (48 month) Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion (standard seats) Interior: Cloth Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Standard equipment Floormat: Carpet SVrings, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Standard equipment Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Standard equipment Radio: AM/FM Cassette factory installed Paint: Solid color Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators • SVeedometer: Standard equipment Mirrors: Outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side Cruise Control: Standard equipment MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED! 1992 Ford Taurus L Sedan TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT:$1d,660.00 each NET PRICE AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: 514,000.75. B ci price includes st.insrPcti_on anc�doc tee VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: 184 FORD LIC# 534720 VIN# 1FABP43G7EZ154895 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS): 190 Days approximately The vehicle we propose meets all of the above svecifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present car. E 931 BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR ,THE VEHICLES) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. F:f`me 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE • TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: Main Ford Mercury ADDRESS:90fl W. Main CITY, STATE, ZIP: Port Lavaca. 'texas 77479 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: Sales PHONE NUMBER: 512 552-6741 Cl 1332 �J C L w_ SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO (2) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD FULL SIZE POLICE PACKAGE VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door //f/v Wheel Base: at least 112.6 Engine: V-8, not less than 318 C. I., with 4 barrel EF/ V8 carburetor, high performance y/n� O/h'C Brakes: Heavy Duty power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Heavy duty automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Ou 14- "" `✓ Q l Battery: Heavy duty (' marrbta) 6V f%nvf. 99-ZxVfwA Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Interior: All vinyl Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer _ Tires: Five (5) HR78-15 Hi -Speed Police tiresPa-6_/7v14 sw Spotlight: Five inch, mounted on driver's side Floormat: Standard equipment Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Heavy duty Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Trailer package & e-n�bladed fan Radio: AM factory installed Paint: Solid color (White) Gauejes: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Factory certified Mirrors: Outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: 1992 Ford Crown Victoria Police Package Sedans TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT: $3A,498.00 ' otal $17,249.00 EACH NEETT PRICE, � AFTER C TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: For 'TVA S3A.a98.00 VEHICLES TbIBE TT�WADm6F; TNSPFx7.'.T.ON, nOC. PETS 531,579.50 '87 FORD LIC# 514744 VIN# 2FABP72G1HX162228 190 FORD LIC# 584701 VIN# 2FACP72G5LX146871 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS)• 90 days after Feb. 1992 if bid awarded this month. THTS TS AN RSTTMATT N..... TDS WFRF TNCOMTN(,. The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present Police cars. 933 • BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLES) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JUANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO • DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND A140T11ER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: Main Ford Mercury ADDRESS: 90Fk W. Main CITY, STATE, ZIP: Port ravaca, Texas 77979 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: Sales PHONE NUMBER: 51.2 55?•F741. 934 M • SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO (2) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD FULL SIZE POLICE PACKAGE VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least 112.6 Engine: V-8, not less than 318 C. I., with 4 barrel carburetor, high performance Brakes: Heavy Duty power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Heavy duty automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Battery: Heavy duty (48 month) Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Interior: All vinyl Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Five (5) HR78-15 Hi -Speed Police tires Spotlight: Five inch, mounted on driver's side Floormat: Standard equipment Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Heavy duty Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Trailer package & six bladed fan Radio: AM factory installed • Paint: Solid color (White) Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Factory certified Mirrors: Outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT: NET PRICE, AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: 187 FORD LIC# 514744 VIN# 2FABP72G1HX162228 190 FORD LIC# 584701 VIN# 2FACP72G5LX146871 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS): The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present Police cars. WF, ARE UNART.E To RID AT THTS TTMI _ q`HANT< YOU FOR CONSIDERTNG US. TN YOUR RTD. • Sincerely, OTPP_n C� BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLE(S) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JUANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN • CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: MATN Chrvsl.er Plmouth ADDRESS: 9r1R WEST MATN CITY, STATE, ZIP: Port Tavaca, Texas 7797Q AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: PHONE NUMBER: 512 552-6741 • 1991 SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE: (1) NEW I-In4 v.VEHICLES FOR YOUR CONSID?•32ATION: STANDARD VEHICLE: S'r'OCt< x:tn73 CNC • Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least E.03 Fngi.ne: V-G Brakes: Standard power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Standard automatic transmission Air Conditioner: I Faci.ory installed air conditioner Heat:e:r & Defrost: Froesh .-iir heater. & defrost Dati:ery: Iiea'xy duty (s* x ") std. battery Altern tor: Not less than 90 amps taindsh eld: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushionStd. seats Inferior.: Cloth windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tares: Standard equipment Faoormat: Carpet Standard equipment Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer barqP.: C:lgarette lighter: Stnndard equipment Arm Rests: Standard equipment Radlat:or• & fan: Standard equipment. Radio: AM/F'M Cassette factory installed Paint:: Solid color Gauges: Amp oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Standard equipment M:.i1-rors: outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side C':ru.ise Control.: Standard equipment • MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: ---1991_ I xk1P Sp y.t'A.L_lkiSd. ilil l crvara�,ti.l.t- TOT.kL PRICE, PER UNIT: 11,169.95 _ FE'.1' PRICE AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: 11,169.95 less 700 b'.1,210.70 less trade TAus i_nsoecfon as—n(T-cFcc _fPe VEHICLES TO BF TRADED: 184 FORD LICI 534720 VIN# 1.FABP43G7EZ154895 F:S'L'I:MA'CED DELIVERY (DAYS)'. ut�on notification if unit iG Gull In stock The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present car. 9 • BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE AIL, TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY LEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPAR'TMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLE(S) HAS 'TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AlfD 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMI:SSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALP.PIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE P.ROPOSAI: DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 1.992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN • CANCELLATION OF THE B.ID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: MATN CHR`!ST.T.R PT.VMOUi'II ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: Port. Trwaara, Texas 77Q'7c) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: (I/�Oa C���✓ _ �------ T:1TL:E: Sales PHONE KJ14BER: S17 SS?-rl741. C SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE (1) NEW 1992 VEHICLES • STANDARD VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least 103 Engine: V-6 Brakes: Standard power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Standard automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Battery: Heavy duty (48 month) Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Interior: Cloth Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Standard equipment Floormat: Carpet Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Standard equipment Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Standard equipment Radio: AM/FM Cassette factory installed Paint: Solid color Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Standard equipment Mirrors: outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side • Cruise Control: Standard equipment MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE,OFFERED: I99;L Cis Vitot-d CoiniCA TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT: NET PRICE, AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: Z VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: 184 FORD LIC# 534720 VIN# 1FABP43G7EZ154895 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS): !p The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present car. • 4 939 BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLES) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JANUARY • 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: I�1NbCbVlc ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP• AUTHORIZIGNATURE: TITLE: ((,_w((//�Y �i''//nnrr PHONE NUMBER: ��L r 071 a1N • 940 • 0 SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO (2) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD FULL SIZE POLICE PACKAGE VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least 112.6 Engine: V-8, not less than 318 C. I., with 4 barrel carburetor, high performance Brakes: Heavy Duty power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Heavy duty automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Battery: Heavy duty (48 month) Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Interior: All vinyl Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Five (5) HR78-15 Hi -Speed Police tires Spotlight: Five inch, mounted on driver's side Floormat: Standard equipment SVrings, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Heavy duty Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Trailer package & six bladed fan Radio: AM factory installed Paint: Solid color (White) Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Factory certified Mirrors: Outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side MAKE QANND DESSC/R/IPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT: 32,� 3 v� Q`1634 � Oa( NET PRICE, AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: "(I 773 �' VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: '87 FORD LIC# 514744 .VIN# 2FABP72GIHX162228 '90 FORD LIC# 584701 VIN# 2FACP72G5LX146871 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS): ( S The vehicle we propose meets all of the above svecifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present Police cars. �l BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLES) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JUANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE.BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. PHONE NUMBER: SS,*L - a% ( r 0 • • 942 MAW • SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO (2) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD FULL SIZE POLICE PACKAGE VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door 350cr Wheel Base: at least 112.6 Engine: V-8, not less than 318 C. I., with 4 barrel carburetor, high performance Brakes: Heavy Duty power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Heavy duty automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater & Defrost: Fresh air heater & defrost Battery: Heavy duty (48 month) Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted ' Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Interior: All vinyl Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Five (5) HR78-15 Hi -Speed Police tires zvr Spotlight: Five inch, mounted.on driver's side Floormat: Standard equipment Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Heavy duty Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equi ment Radiator & fan: Trailer acka e & six bladed fan Radio: AM factory ins le Paint: Solid color (White) Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Factory certified Mirrors: outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT:/�Zy.e3o 7o>9L og7�Im,oa NET PRICE, AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE:_ J0 300.00 VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: '87 FORD LIC# 514744 VIN# 2FABP72G1HX162228,XS-,),0.e0 190 FORD LIC,I 584701 VINI 2FACP72G5LX146871_5/4',r0.00 ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS) : The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of present Police cars. is V13 BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLES) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JUANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: ADDRESS: /�Q, W 77 CITY, STATE, ZIP: (/�Tpw 17;l/CI AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: PHONE NUMBER: ;//a� f%?// /l�PC7' t/On/'C"Z/ oo 944 In u • SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE (1) NEW 1992 VEHICLES STANDARD VEHICLE: Body Style: Four (4) door Wheel Base: at least 103 Engine: V-6 Brakes: Standard power brakes Steering: Power steering Transmission: Standard automatic transmission Air Conditioner: Factory installed air conditioner Heater a DefrnSt: Fresh air he=.ter & defrest Battery: Heavy duty (48 month) Alternator: Not less than 90 amps Windshield: Tinted Seats: Heavy duty front seat of foam cushion Interior: Cloth Windshield Wipers: Two speed, electric, with washer Tires: Standard equipment Floormat: Carpet Springs, Shocks, Stabilizer bar: Standard equipment Cigarette lighter: Standard equipment Arm Rests:Standard equipment Radiator & fan: Standard equipment Radio: AM/FM Cassette factory installed Paint: Solid color Gauges: Amp, oil & heat gauges, instead of light indicators Speedometer: Standard equipment Mirrors: Outside mirrors, one on driver's side and one on passenger's side Cruise Control: Standard equipment MAKE AND DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE OFFERED: TOTAL PRICE, PER UNIT: Za 00.00 NET PRICE, AFTER TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE: /Q, 06 VEHICLES TO BE TRADED: 184 FORD LIC# 534720 VIN# 1FABP43G7EZ154895 -1 <r0 °V ESTIMATED DELIVERY (DAYS) : (�' 0 The vehicle we propose meets all of the above specifications. The above bids may be accepted with or without trade-in of Dresent car. 945- BID PRICE MUST INCLUDE ALL TITLES, LICENSE, DOCUMENTARY FEES, STATE INSPECTION, AND ANY OTHER FEES. NO PAYMENT ON THIS BID WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. THE COUNTY OFFICIAL/DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEHICLES) HAS TAKEN DELIVERY, INSPECTED THE VEHICLE(S), AND NOTIFIED THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF SATISFACTORY INSPECTION. AND 2. BIDDER HAS DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE AN INVOICE AND ALL PAPERWORK NECESSARY FOR TITLE APPLICATION. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO WAIVE TECHNICALITIES, REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, AND ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL DEEMED MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO CALHOUN COUNTY. DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE MUST BE MADE ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 1992 BUT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM BID ACCEPTANCE DATE. NO DELIVERY WILL BE ACCEPTED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1992. FAILURE • TO DELIVER THE VEHICLE BY THE REQUIRED TIME MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE BID AND ANOTHER BID ACCEPTED. NAME: ADDRE CITY, STATE, ZIP: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: PHONE NU14BER: • 946 911-NEW ADDRESSING SYSTEM Henry Barber addressed the Court and reported on the new addressing system anticipated for 911. No action was taken. MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER -EXPANSION The Court discussed the need for a sewer line between the two buildings at the Hospital, at an additional cost to the county and there was no action taken and this was passed to November 15, 1991, when this can be discussed with the architect. • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 1990 Jerome Kotzur. CPA of Bumgardner, Morrison & Company presented the Annual Financial Report to the Court as of Dec. 31, 1990. A Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried, that the Court approve the report as presented. CALHOUIH COUNTY, TEXAS Annual Financial Report Presentation to the Commissioners Court November 12, 1991 • Presented by • BUMGARDNER, MORRISON 3 COMPANY Certified Public Accountants Jerome G. Notzur, Partner 947 CALJHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS • Annual Financial Report Presentation to the Commissioners Court November 12, 1991 I. Introductory Section A. Directory of Officials and Department Heads B. Calhoun County Organization Chart C. County Auditor's Letter of Transmittal II. Financial Section A. Report of the Independent Auditors (page 20) 1. We have audited the December 31, 1990 general purpose financial statements 2. The financial statements are the responsibility of management 3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the general purpose financial statements based on our audit. 4. Our audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing • standards 5. Acknowledges auditor's responsibility to provide reasonable -not absolute - assurance that the financial statements are free of material errors and irregularities. 6. Brief description of audit introduces several concepts inherent in an audit. An audit includes - a. examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. b. assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general purpose financial statement presentation. 7. Addresses sufficiency of auditor's work. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, which states that the general purpose financial statements, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, as of December 31, 1990, and the results of its operations and changes in its fund balance for the year then ended. B. Supplemental Schedules a. have been audited b. are fairly stated c. are not a required statement under GAAS • A 948 Annual Financial Report Presentation to the Commissioners Court November 12, 1991 Page 2 B. Combined Balance Sheet (pages 22-23) • 1. Assets a. Available Cash has increased by approximately $7,557,000, due primarily to the sale of bonds for the new construction of the hospital in the Capital Projects Fund. b. Taxes Receivable has increased about $103,000, due to a tax rate increase in 1990. C. Net Physical Properties increased approximately 02,071,000; consists primarily of the completed cost of the new library addition (9775,000), curb and gutter additions (9200,000) and an increase of approximately $882,000 in net physical properties for the hospital. d. Amount Available In Debt Service Funds are funds set aside for the retirement of debt. e. Amount To Be Provided For Obligation Retirement is the long term debt for the bond issue. 2. Liabilities a. Accounts Payable have increased by approximately $218,000, due primarily to the capital projects fund (construction of the hospital) • b. Accrued Expenses have increased by approximately $187,000, due primarily to the accrual of expenses of the hospital. C. Deferred Revenue increased by approximately 9181,000 primarily to an increase in the amount of taxes collected. d. Long Term Obligations Under Capital Leases increased by $352,182 because of leases entered into by the hospital. e. Long Term Debt is a result of the bond issue. 3. Fund Equity a. Investment In General Fixed Assets increased as described above. b. Retained Earnings in the proprietary fund types decreased primarily to the losses incurred by the sanitary landfill. C. Fund Balance Capital Improvements increased because of the bond issue. d. Unappropriated Fund Balance decreased by approximately $303,000 due primarily to expenditures exceeding revenues in the general fund. ;. 949 Annual Financial Report Presentation to the Commissioners Court November 12, 1991 Page 3 C. Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, Transfers and Changes in Fund Balances (pages 24 and 25) 1. Comparison of revenues a. Tax revenue increased by approximately $843,000 due primarily to the tax increase. b. Interest increased by approximately $99,000 due to interest being earned on the bond proceeds. c. Gifts L Contributions increased by approximately $500,000 due to a gift from Formosa for the hospital expansion. 2. Comparison of expenditures a. Public Facilities decreased by approximately $503,000; primarily because of $358,000 of the expenditures from the new library and the sewer plant were placed in this account last year and none in the current year; and the remainder was due to the fact that the jail expenditures were placed in this account last year ($208,192), but placed in Public Safety in the currently year. b. Public Safety increased by approximately $592,000, primarily becauF • of the cost of the jail were included in this account in the curret. year and not in the previous year ($230,000); also, salary and benefit costs increased during the currently year. C. Health and Welfare increased by $261,000 because of the County'a portion of indigent health coats decreased by approximately $585,000 over the previous year; and approximately $616,000 of the construction costs of the new hospital and the sewer plant are included in this account. d. Culture and Recreation expenditures increased by approximately $771,000 due to the completion of the new library. e. Community Development increased by $67,600 and Conservation decreased approximately $70,000 because the costs of the extension service was moved from the conservation account to the community development account. f. Roads and Bridges expenditures increased by $326,000 due the following; increase In expenditures for salaries of approximately $75,000; for supplies of approximately $109,000 and capital improvements of $175,000. 3. Deficiency of revenues over expenditures of $491,481 compared to $464,740 for the prior year. • D. Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, Transfers and Changes In Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (pages 26 and 27) E. Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, Transfers L Changes in Retained Earnings, for All Proprietary Fund Types L Similar Trust Funds (page 28) 950 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ELECTION -CANVASS OF RETURNS The Court canvassed the returns of the Constitutional Amendment Election held November 5, 1991 and ordered same recorded in the Election Records in the County Clerk's Office. ORDER APPOINTING BEN H.COMISKEY, JR.- COUNTY AUDITOR Entered into the minutes Order Appointing Ben H. Comiskey, Jr. County Auditor effective November 1, 1991 through October 31, 1993. COUNTY OF CALHOUN STATE OF TEXAS ORDER APPOINTING BEN H. COMISKEY, JR. COUNTY AUDITOR We, Clarence N. Stevenson, Marion Lewis and Whayland W. Kilgore, Judges of the 24th, 135th and 267th Judicial District Courts respectively of Calhoun County, Texas, and having jurisdiction in the County of Calhoun, State of Texas, which said County has a population of more than 10,000 inhabitants according to the last preceding Federal Census, this day having considered the appointment of an Auditor of Accounts and Finances for said County for a term of Two Years, beginning November 11 1991 and ending October 31, 1993, do after consideration appoint BEN H. COMISKEY, JR. County Auditor in and for Calhoun County, Texas, for the said • term and until his successor shall have been appointed and qualified. IT IS ORDERED that said BEN H. COMISKEY, JR. shall before entering upon his duties, execute a good and sufficient bond as provided by law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appointment shall be recorded in the Minutes of the District Courts of Calhoun County, Texas; and the Clerk is directed to certify the same to the Commissioners' Court of Calhoun County for observance. /4s/ SIGNED AND APPROVED on this the -55�crl day of A.D., 7!!�W Clarence N. Stevenson, Judge, 24th District Marion Lewis, Judge, 135th District . 4Whayld. Kilgore, Judge, 26 District TIt AGE I�8 K -f ._M 991 CUELLAR N COUNTY. TEXAS 951 COUNTY AUDITOR'S OATH "I, Ben H. Comiskey, Jr., do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of Calhoun County Auditor of the State of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States and of this State; and I furthermore solemnly swear (or affirm), that I have not directly or indirectly paid, offered, or promised to pay, contributed, or promised, to contribute any money, or valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment, as a reward to secure my appointment or the confirmation thereof. So help me God." BEN COMTSKEY, SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, at Port Lavaca, Texas, this the llth day of October, A.D., 1991. VOL 33 FILED PAGE Iro9 AT jploo O'CLOCK 6,_M OCT 3 11991 IE HARRIS CUELLAR 41STRIC CLEIIK, CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS OLLIE CUELLAR DISTRICT CLERK IN AND FOR CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS N • 952"'. CERTIFICATE OF TRUE COPY OF PAPER OF RECORD • THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF CALHOUN X I, OLLIE HARRIS CUELLAR, Clerk of the District Court of Calhoun County, Texas, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original ORDER APPOINTING BEN H. CP,OSLEU. JR., COUNTY AUDITOR and OATH OF OFFICE as the same appears of record in my office, in the minutes of the • District Cou-t Records of said County, in Volume 33 Page 168-169 Given under my hand and seal of said Court, at office in Port Lavaca, Texas, this the 31st day of October A.D. 19 91 OLLIE HARRIS CUELLAR CLERK, DISTRICT COURT CALHOU,AN COUNTY, TEXAS BY: z s /'L] � . l �n/LLLP 241 , Awretw • 953 APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by ommissiO er Smith and carried that the minutes of the Aug. 2nd, 30th, Sept. 3rd, 6th, Q.th, 13th, 16th, 25, 30th and October 7th, 1991 be approvo MR ss sioner,Pct.2 p He en J. mit Commnisioner,Pct.3 BIDS fi PROPOSALS -AMBULANCE E UIPMENT FLOATER INSURANCE The following bid was the only bid received for Ambulance Equipment Floater Insurance. A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded al by Commissioner Smith and carried that we accept the bid of Hilb, Rog al Hamilton. ZNBDRANCS PROP08AL8 For the following types of coverage: AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT FLOATER (Policy / TIX 911613) COVERAGE INCEPTION DAT 11-17-91 COVERAGE IS TO BE THE SAME AS UNDER EXISTING POLICIES WHICH MAY BE REVIEWED IN THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, CALHOUN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. (Policies must remain in the County Auditor's Office.) DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE UPON PAYMENT OF A $10.00 DEPOSIT, REFUNDABLE TO BIDDERS SUBMITTING A SEALED PROPOSAL. ALL INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BIDDER. PROPOSAL AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUSIVE OF STATE TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER COSTS OF THE INSURANCE POLICY. (Rates quoted will be guaranteed for 12 months. Second and third years will be re -negotiated with same carrier.) PROPOSAL ANNUAL PREMIUM 3-YEAR PREMIUM 1) AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT FLOATER $ 5,419.00 $ NAME: HILB, ROGAL, AND HAMILTON CO. OF VICTORIA ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3710 CITY, STATE, ZIP: VICTORIA, TX 77903-3710 PHONE NUMBER: 1-512-575-8256 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: n B. Hudson TITLE: PRESIDENT • • 954 BIDS & PROPOSALS- UTILITY TRACTOR-PREC.# ONE Commissioner Belk made the motion to reject all bids on the utility tractor for Precinct one, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried. Bids in minutes of Oct.31,1991. BIDS & PROPOSALS - TRACTOR FOR PRECINCT ONE AND FOUR A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for • bids for a tractor for precinct one and four,to open November 27,1991. BIDS & PROPOSALS - ROAD MATERIALS,ETC. FOR 1992 A motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that the County Auditor be authorized to advertise for bids for road materials, insecticides, timbers, various pipe, indigent drugs, fuel, asphalt, oils and emulsions for the year 1992, to be opened December 9, 1991 at 10:00 A.M. HEALTH AUTHORITY - APPOINTMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that Dr. Patti Dodson be re -appointed as the County Health Authority. • CLOSED SESSION -CONFER WITH ATTORNEY The Court being in open session in compliance with the pertinent provisions of Sec. 3A of Art, 6252.17 of Texas Civil Statutes,the County Judge as presiding officer publicly announced that a closed session would now be held under the provisions of Sec. 2e of said Art. 6252.17 for the purpose of conferring with the County's Attorney. The County Judge further publicly announced that before any final action, decision or vote is made regarding the subject matter of said closed session, this meeting will be reopened to the public. The Court then went into closed session. At the end of the closed session the meeting was reopened to the public . A MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the County's Attorney , Dan Heard , be authorized to make an offer to Gloria Saldivar for settlement of her case. BUDGET AMENDMENT - SHERIFF'S DEPT.-PORT LAVACA FIRE DEPT. Motion by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula that the following Budget Amendments be approved. • 955 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court _ From: (21-)L/ioU�J (Department making this request) Date: I request an amendment to the _ %J _-- budget for the (year) following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account M Account Name Amount Reason M11ry111Y11111ry M1111111YY1YM1YY111ry 1111111Y111ryY ryn.Y 11M1ry11Y1ry11Y1M1 YM1 C/- t V/ LfJkl FNF, L7C;1[:r73" 21 OUp, dc' O/-VS-Uo S// %1oJc 06PI/ Sor-,:r i,boo.00 _o\/CRwu Gl ySUo-Stan AWClt.. ln��SuyrY/ 000.Do 0/-�ISNU- (ocl�0 Uitr6. ? '90.00 —o�/E2 D/rRi.r.J D/-UfVn-fcinu/ C1IlU E 1/F. L/r�F; /Ts' 2 2),i.0o� - byCKDV,gw.j Net change in total budget for this department iso * _. Other remarks/justification: sa Boa Ww i i. i understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): , • • • .. 956 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calh un County Commissioners' Court From: 79d G(ICILC" ��I;LE, bi at (Department making this request) Date: I/- I wI I request an amendment to the Ik 91 budget for the year • following line items in my department: Amendment GL Account Account Name Amount ------------------------------- ------------- -g6j6"6c I �Qcu)L , Q� Net change in total budget for this department is: $ *Other remarks/justification: • Reason ------------------- %.F ` NOV 1 2 I' -J iu I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. 7 Signature of official/department head: Qz /, Date of Commissioners' Court approval: Date posted to General Ledger account(s): 957 4• ACCOUNTS ALLOWED -COUNTY • Claims totaling $384,602.99 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED- HOSPITAL Claims totaling $2,629.81 were presented by the County Auditro and after reading and verifying same, a Motion was made by Commissioner Belk, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED -COUNTY A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that the amount of $1400.00 for 1990 audit be paid to Bumgardner & Morrison. COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT The County Treasurer presented her monthly report for October, 1991, and after reading and verifying same, a motion was made by Copmmissioner • Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried that said report be approved. THE COURT RECESSED UNTIL NOVEMBER 15, 1991 at 10:00 A.M. is RE 11 REGULAR NOVEMBER TERM THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF CALHOUN HELD NOVEMBER 15, 1991 BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this the 15th day of November, A.D.. 1991,.there was begun and holden at the Courthouse in the City of Port Lavaca, said County and State, at 10:00 A.M., a Regular Term of the Commissioners' Court, within said County and State, and there were present on this date the following members of the Court, to -wit: Howard G. Hartzog County Judge Leroy Belk Commissioner,Pct.l Stanley Mikula Commissioner,Pct 2 Helen J. Smith Commissioner,Pct 3 Oscar F. Hahn Commissioner,Pct.4 • Marlene Paul County Clerk whereupon the following proceedings were had: Judge Hartzog gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. RENOVATION - MEMORIAL HOSPITAL After hearing a report from Murray Sisson with Page, Sutherland, Page, A MOTION was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Commissioner Hahn and carried that at the recommendation of Commissioner Hahn that Young Plumbing Compnay be contracted on a cost plus basis, not to exceed $2600.00 , to lay a 6" sewer line at Memorial Medical Center as per the drawing of 11-13-91 submitted by Murray Sisson of Page, Sutherland Page, to be co-ordinated by Commissioner Hahn. GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY- PERMITS A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn , seconded by Commissioner Belk , and carried, that Calhoun County grant a permit to GBRA to install facilities as shown on the following instruments with the understanding that by the usage of such permit GBRA agrees that such facilities and the installation, maintenance and usage thereof shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions set out in the • original contract between GBRA and Calhoun County dated March 21, 1972 and recorded in Vol. R, Page 307 of the Commissioners' Court minutes of Calhoun County, Texas and that GBRA agrees to be bound by all such terms and provisions. 959 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/14/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: D. S. PosPal Service C. Number of Connections Wanted: ONE D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2720 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature neering: Date Signature • • • Q • AV E. °l. i i 1 MAIN STREET 1 r {I t 'I I QQ Co V Revision Date No. Revision Date Scale: = 100 �� I� ------- —----- --- --- — - — — -- Drawn by, J.. L�uK p?. - _ — SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM • 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/22/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Doyle G. Adams C. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: D - 20 - A E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20 2721 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: Meter will be installed in account # 20',1885 existing box. (Relocated account #20 1885, II.P. Dumas). Existing, meter box is not on corner lease note new ma . 2. Engineering le ew o be completed y Engineering A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature ering: Date Signature • 9664 Wharton Barnels jq U) to LLJ Q 7— ----7,—, a ri K) co co 1- (D 00 co tj -i W. C` o t r bn d ki in r- V t-- > v- (IDD —43-4P QZ 77, 1 2 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/22/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Alan Cartmell C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: Dl9A E. Customer Number to be assigned:19-2722 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature Nov i 519 i • • 964 965 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM • 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/22/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Killebrew Inc. C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: NXX 20-2723 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature sr- Engineering: Date Signature Nov • n M ` sytz bF�� �w b 0 • /Yi tb0. u tt)ASP 1A)GTO�/' — — — —� ' • • 729 e \ �N ,-to 5,0. aII COMn r � " 1 M` c � c s n r � • a � 3°E •1 727 • } ggq{d G E Holtheuaer D a7a3 o s p o to rT lBBW ( 2- N c 0 9 0 -F- o. N I i e,b rec.J NC- • __ • ---ice . • 41-- 20- 27Z3 1019A _ _A 6 0 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/22/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Rudolph Jahn C. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: A-19-B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20 2724 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature .r.:::�.•fl o N^ ii'� fir; �� �..._ ineerin ' _,.... _' :_" g g ' Date Signature • NOV ;� 5 • `A n-)--z.N v c 0 J W 7 N J !� • z' an J (ID 0 c� t i W E Schnlffbauer 1 654 • Mal t C I v F 8. Meusel 9/ V krx 0 736011 i -Z G Morton in r4 807 • Thomas Dean Y 1 7350 R.E. Ehiert _ vV�OI s C-qr eo ILO - �p�C 1001 -1 _U L SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 10/23/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Robert D. Boyd C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D19B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2725 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: C11 Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Nov 5 %I Engineering: --�� Date Signature -----• 970 C it J. L. Lester 0 730 11J. D. Lajser 0707 L A. Giorgio (0685 All 971 SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION • CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: I1gio, B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Joe E. Magee C. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: D- 20 - A E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20 2726 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: • Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation comDleted: Data Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: • Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature 972 1 tea. 1 : , �Pmem �eo--1 n ��rr825e 1 J. S. Laguorta 712 I � I N � I 0 N I I I I. i I I I J. D. Branch 789 • I to G. W.--ommack I ; 725 • I T.� �-- ----i r3 n U SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 11/5/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Roger D. Thorson, Sr. C. Number of Connections Wanted: one D. Map Sheet Number: D - 19 - .B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20 2727 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date • B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: • Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature moo ; 5 in 9'74 _... , 11 �J 'ANY 1 1662 Robert E. Erwin c 0 P ra ti V1 0 3 ti r • VAN LU, a8070 in � Thomas Dean J � m 73501 R.E. Ehlert O Z z x rn Q � 4p. y O hrl A d r-6 mi A r �OOJ�J O. �i1pJ SJ DISTRIBUTION SYSTE WATER DISTRIBUTION Ic CALHOUN COUNTY , T 975 .. • vau-ap 11 Va\ CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM • 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 11/1/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Salvador Romero C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D18 E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2728 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3• Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: • Date Signature 1 p_PMONIF_•' NOV 9776 5�5t�-L II 977 ?—RVICE CONNECTION INFORMAT )N CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM • I,, Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 6/4/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: +�ssell-�°a;r ai,ne C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: Dl8 (Dos Bahias area) E. Customer Number to be assigned: 19-2729 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: • Date Signature 00�� I �91 • J A O D 19 1. M SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION • CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 11/4/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Bertha C. Johnson C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20C E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2730 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature • C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: • Date Signature 980 16th • 15th • 141h 0 n O 3 3 m c� m m m im SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM --1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 11/7/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Roy Flaharty C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2731 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line• 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering: Date Signature Bpi i� J.. . • • • 982 WLT7 3 4 Olt c al PAJ /Yet, z6o, PAI fit, — ------------------- ) -D - �WS H I N G �B LNiTO �N� r (10 (V3 0741 G. L. Wingington 1 10713 111074 G. L. Wingington 10 .713 L t _ Woehl ;> V' j 0608 060810 H Harry Pond X- PARK DRIVE SERVICE CONNECTION INFORMATION CALHOUN COUNTY RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM • 1. Connection Date (To be Completed by Operations) A. DATE: 11/6/91 B. Name of Customer Requesting Service: Louise Echols C. Number of Connections Wanted: One D. Map Sheet Number: D20B E. Customer Number to be assigned: 20-2732 F. Prospects for Additional Customers to be served by the Proposed Line: 2. Engineering Review (To be completed by Engineering) A. Received by Engineering: Date B. Recommended for Installation as submitted: Date Signature C. Recommended for Installation as follows: Date Signature 3. Report of Installation (To be completed by Operations) A. Installation completed: Date Signature B. Remarks (If installation differs from recommendations) 4. Posted to "As Built Plans": Operations: Date Signature Engineering,:._ . '�- Signature • • 98� • 618 First Baptist Church 1)s'1)e L s,.r mho /s 2,7 3 z JTH 41T f/ R,D \y R, b U d L 9S5 BIDS AND PROPOSALS -SHERIFF DEPT. VEHICLES A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the low bid for the three sheriff vehicles be awarded to Knapp Chevrolet,Inc., the low bidder. (Bids are recorded in November 12, 1991 minutes beginning on page 929. BUDGET AMENDMENT- LIBRARY A motion was made by Commissioner Hahn, seconded by Commissioner Belk and carried that the following Budget Amendment be approved. _ BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST To: Calhoun County Commissioners' Court From: cxaY,C(44' (Department making this request) Date: 1(-Iq- cl l I request an amendment to the ) C/I budget for the year following line items inmy department: Amendment GL Account # Account Name Amount Net change in total budget for this department is: ------------- Other remarks/justification: Reason I understand that my budget cannot be amended as requested until Commissioners' Court approval is obtained. Signature of official/department head: _T1 Ca QQ �n� Date of Commissioners' Court approval: �Nt) Date posted to General Ledger account(s): NOV • • L e ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY A motion was made by Commissioner Mikula, seconded by Helen Smith and carried, that the Court authorize the County Auditor to pay the Fair Assoc. bill of $869.94 out of the Building account, with a recommendation that the replacement work be done according to county specifications and the County Fair Association pay the replacement costs. ACCOUNTS ALLOWED - COUNTY • Claims totaling $5,683,135.43 were presented by the County Auditor and after reading and verifying same, a motions was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried that said claims be approved for payment. BUDGET AMENDMENT -EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Mikula and carried, that the following Budget Amendments be approved. (BUDGET-AB7U5T'MER T-REl]UESTI 11 Is l.1n Cr>v.r. 1:;• Arldi 1;1-1.. 1'1 _.Emergent Mana ement _ „ !Usp.nr l:menl; mahi ue7 I:Ili.s requee, I;1 u.nte: Nov. 12, 1991 I:C, i; lla C111'1"fsn 1. II.I IIf E'1; 1'o I" Ili 11 df+l: _1'trllFall t'. Ihf ir:.l lo2rorirel frau,¢r^I-=.. 1-,=sul 1; ill a net cliaIlge of zero to the total budget for expenditures by category- !i.._,.. Supplirr..:. Capital • Amendment GL Account 11 Account Name Amount Reason 01-45-05-5113 Copies - [ 40.001 .-_..._-------- ry 92 Dues to the --- -------------------------- --- 01-45 05-5310 Dues 40.00 Emerg. Mgmt. Assoc. of TX 01-45-05-5113 Copies [200.001 Cover the cost of 01-45 05-6221 Postage _. .............. ___.._ [143.371 __---' -- identification supplies ---------------- 01-45 05-6210 Telephone [100.00] for Emergency Mgmt. --------------- 01-45-05-5140 Program Supplies 443.37 Net change in total budget for tills department is! R---0--- , 11 IJ <r :-rnn ar to jItr l: iiit.a Lion: I i u ri I.r P I U I' tl 1 IlueluIudL)et ra I u-, I[ unt I V o, 1. l; h en it I:1'lr I i, r -a I C he I tCo.0 ll I'mI p -j,11 In r. cr 1 fl,C.i.l 11t I1.,r Lnrnl hr ati rr n B 7t 1.. ! I.I1 I lr I I.Ir.E, UIT CANAIl r m1)1'E: �. nale of y 1 rl.va 1. c. llal pt. b•=_d fl 1. r•r, ¢I a] Irt rlq r• :ccr-unl!�J: 987 Tu- Cal|mun Cuunty Auditor F/nm: Building Department ----- _--------- ...... -- (Departmept mak�ng this rcquest) Date: Nov. 12, 100/ / I request an adjustme?t tp the current bodget fur my departmeot: lxe folzowing transfrrs resel1, In abudoet for expenditures by category(i.e., Supplies, Services, Capital out}a;). BL Account # ~~~^^^"----- ~ 01^45-65~5113 01-46-65^6210 Amendment Account Name Amount Reason Copies [75.001 Cover phone bill for ... . ........ �����----- ----- --_-������ Telephone 75.00 Nov. & Dec. 1991 11 Net change in total budget for this department Is: Uther rewarks/justificatinr; $ --- O--- � � �K' � [ ' r I o, o'/erstand that this adjustment tu my budgpt be made without t|ie appro,al of the Covnty Judge' /Si t re � ffi i )/d t � h d g^a u s o c a spar n.en ea � APrROVAL <SI8N0TURE} OF COUHTY 7UDGE� Oate sf app.ova/: Date po!�Led to General Lcdger accoun1,��>� THE COURT ADJOURNED.